4 user

Sutter's Gold (1936)

Approved | | Adventure, Drama, History | 1 March 1936 (USA)
Story of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.


James Cruze


Blaise Cendrars (based on novel by), Jack Kirkland (screenplay) | 3 more credits »


Cast overview:
Edward Arnold ... Johan (John) Sutter
Lee Tracy ... Pete Perkin
Binnie Barnes ... Countess Elizabeth Bartoffski
Katharine Alexander ... Anna Sutter
Montagu Love ... Capt. Kettleson
Addison Richards ... James Marshall
John Miljan ... Gen. Juan Bautista Alvarado
Harry Carey ... Kit Carson
William Janney ... John Sutter Jr.
Nan Grey ... Ann Eliza Sutter
Robert Warwick ... Gen. Alexander Rotscheff
Morgan Wallace ... General Fremont
Allen Vincent ... Juan Bautista Alvarado Jr.
Mitchell Lewis ... King Kamehameha




Story of the gold strike on an immigrant's property that started the 1849 California Gold Rush.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Approved | See all certifications »

Did You Know?


The story was bought by Universal in the 20s as a project for Soviet director Sergei Eisenstein, but was shelved when the studio and the director could not agree on the social aspects of the script. In the mid-80s another version was planned as a joint Canadian-French co-production by Moshe Mizrahi's Rosa Productions by New York-based Isram Film Corporation to be shot in the U.S. and Canada, but for reasons that are unclear it was not made. See more »


Edited into Mutiny on the Blackhawk (1939) See more »

User Reviews

A historical mess....it's also pretty dull and episodic and nearly destroyed the studio!
11 January 2017 | by MartinHaferSee all my reviews

"Sutter's Gold" is a notorious film as it cost a fortune to make and lost nearly every penny of the investment. Considering that Universal Studios was teetering on the verge of bankruptcy, the timing couldn't have been worse! So why did it cost so much and why was it such a poor film? As for the cost, I frankly don't know how it cost $2,000,000 to make (a HUGE sum for the time), as the actors were mostly second or third-tier and the director a relative unknown. The money sure didn't go for salaries! Perhaps it was the scope of the film--as it was supposedly set all over the world. But most, if not all of these locations appeared to have been filmed on the Universal back lot! I just don't understand where all the money went!

As to why it's such a poor film, that's pretty easy to determine. The script was syrupy, overly sentimental and boring. That it was boring is because so much of the film comes off as episodic and disconnected. But that it was dull is a surprise because Sutter's life was pretty interesting when I read up on the man. I can only assume that this is because the script rarely bears much semblance to his actual life...and the prologue actually admits that it's mostly fiction! Regardless, it's not a terrible film but one that seems to go on and on and on....and the main character is, for the most part, a lying blowhard.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 4 user reviews »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.






Release Date:

1 March 1936 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

A Conquista do Ouro See more »


Box Office


$2,000,000 (estimated)
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Universal Pictures See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

Mono (Western Electric Noiseless Recording)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page

Free Movies and TV Shows You Can Watch Now

On IMDb TV, you can catch Hollywood hits and popular TV series at no cost. Select any poster below to play the movie, totally free!

Browse free movies and TV series

Recently Viewed