Three Godfathers (1936) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Unexpectedly tough philosophical western
ChungMo10 December 2005
This was a complete surprise after seeing the John Wayne version first. First of all it is one of the toughest westerns I've seen from the 1930's. Chester Morris is remarkable in his role. The subtlety and naturalism in his acting is really unusual for a film from this era. He says things that would be delivered with a theatrical snarl in lesser westerns but here it comes off believable. Lewis Stone gives depth and Walter Brennan goes from annoying to sympathetic by the end of the film. The baby does a good job as well.

Most westerns from the thirties (especially the serials) are about as unbelievable as you can get and acted unnaturally as well. This film has a gritty realism that wouldn't be seen until the late 50's and the 60's. The script is intellectually well above many other films of the time as well. How many films have ever talked (even briefly) about Schopenhauer? The photography is very good and mostly out of the studio. The only problem the film has is that the actors never really look like they are in desperate health, especially the baby. Other than that I recommend this highly.
35 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Harsher, Tougher Version Of The Story
bkoganbing25 July 2007
Though Chester Morris and Lewis Stone aren't exactly names identified with westerns, together with Walter Brennan they do a very nice job in bringing this earlier and harsher version of the story of Three Godfathers, outlaws who give an infant a chance at life.

Rather than the Three Godfathers from John Ford's later and more famous version, a trio of happy go lucky outlaws who rob a bank and get a posse after them, these are a much tougher group who drift into New Jerusalem one at a time. Morris is from there and hasn't got pleasant memories of the place. He's the one who wants to rob the bank and give a little payback to the town, especially to bank manager Robert Livingston who's going to marry Irene Hervey, Morris's former sweetheart.

Of course out on the desert the trio finds a dying woman with an infant and Brennan and Stone want to help, but Morris very reluctantly goes along. Let's just say that they meet a much meaner end than John Ford gave them in his version.

I do love the chemistry between Stone and Brennan, the college graduate who carries Shakespeare and Schopenhauer in his saddlebags and the illiterate nabob. Stone does not however demean Brennan at all and my favorite scene is him singing Boola Boola in the desert which Morris identifies for Brennan as Stone's old school song.

Richard Boleslavski does not give us the sweeping desert vistas of John Ford's Monument Valley, but this Three Godfathers has a class and dignity all its own. I wish it was broadcast more often.
42 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Despite being a little "heavy handed" and melodramatic, a wonderful Western
planktonrules4 August 2006
This is apparently the second remake of this film. While I have not seen the two prior versions, I did see the 1948 John Wayne remake and the two films are different enough (especially the endings--I preferred the more realistic way it was handled in this version) and I recommend you see both. And, overall I strongly prefer this film to the 1948 one.

Chester Morris was the main star in this film, though today he's mostly been forgotten despite the many films he starred in during the era. The other two co-star bandits are Lewis Stone (yes, the kindly "Judge Hardy" from the Hardy Family series) and Walter Brennan. All did a competent job and the entire movie is well written and directed and is far more watchable than the average Western. About the only problem, and it's a minor one, is that occasionally the film becomes a little bit too melodramatic and heavy-handed. But it also gets high marks for being less predictable and more entertaining that what you usually find in the genre.
36 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Than the Remake
Michael_Elliott28 February 2008
Three Godfathers (1936)

*** (out of 4)

Extremely warm Western has three ruthless outlaws (Chester Morris, Lewis Stone, Walter Brennan) robbing a bank at Christmas time and then heading off into the desert. While on their getaway they come across a dying mother and her young child so the men take the child to try and get it to some place safe. After a bit of bad luck the three find themselves nearing death themselves and to get the baby home it might cost them their lives. I'm sure most people are familiar with the John Ford vehicle with John Wayne but this version is so much better for numerous reasons. The biggest reason is that this version is a lot darker and more grittier than the Ford film, which always seemed a tad bit too cute to me. This film has a lot of dark moments and depends on religion a lot more as well. There's also some nice humor scattered through this film including a great bit with a Santa Clause. Both Morris and Brennan are very good in their roles with Morris giving a very good turn as a really mean guy. Stone steals the film as the older man who tries to talk the other two into having some good in their hearts. Sidney Toler has a small supporting role.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Three men and a baby in the wild wild west
raskimono25 July 2002
This touching moral lesson had been done as a silent version and in another version which is more known because of the renown of its director John Ford, but this version is equally as good as the latter version. Being an MGM version, it's a bit smaltzy as MGM movies of the thirties tended to emphasize that aspect of a story but director, Richard Boleslawski is able to keep the proceedings honest and true. Chester Morris, Lewis Stone and Walter Brennan are very good as the outlaws who ride into and rob a bank in a pious town - Chester Morris plays the "I don't give a damn" cowboy perfectly and with resonance. They make their getaway and in the desert find a baby, and the psychological issues of right and wrong as their paternal, maternal and surrogate parental instincts that exist in all of us take over. As they try to save the child, the trials and tribulations they go through bring out the best qualities of human nature in all of them in us, the audience, as well.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superior Western
Ron Oliver11 December 2003
A trio of desperadoes, fleeing from a violent Christmastime bank robbery, become THREE GODFATHERS after rescuing a dead mother's baby in the desert.

Here is a very fine little film, (largely forgotten due to its color remake years later starring John Wayne) which rewards the fortunate viewer with very good acting, excellent production values, some taut drama and a fair amount of humor.

Lewis Stone dominates the film as the thief with a conscience. Quietly intellectual & patrician, his tenderness for the infant is immediate and absolute. Stone's acting cannot be faulted; watching him painfully choose which of his beloved books to leave behind in the burning desert is to see a true artist at work.

Chester Morris does a dandy job of making the viewer both like and despise his character. Quick-tempered & revengeful, his attack upon the New Jerusalem bank is his opportunity to wreck havoc on both the town which rejected him and the decent young banker in love with his former sweetheart. Morris wants nothing to slow down his escape--not poisoned water holes or dead horses, and especially not a helpless baby.

Walter Brennan practically steals the entire movie with his portrayal of an old, illiterate outlaw whose childlike innocence and decency compels him to protect the infant. He also has some droll comedy sequences, especially at the Church Social, where he has a memorable encounter with a plate of asparagus. His scenes in the desert, with desperate thirst stalking his footsteps, show the consummate skill he would exhibit the rest of his life as one of America's favorite character actors.

In smaller roles, Sidney Toler is wonderfully droll as an itinerate dentist with a deadly aim; bucktoothed Victor Potel is his unfortunate customer. Rotund Roger Imhof plays the friendly sheriff of New Jerusalem; Dorothy Tree is the saloon hostess with a hankering for Morris. Pretty Irene Hervey does well as Morris' former love; her fiancé is nicely played by Robert Livingston, who finds the padding in his Santa suit to be most fortuitous.
38 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Code of the West
boblipton17 March 2002
Not as well known as the 1948 John Ford version, this one does not spoon feed the issues to the viewer. Harsh, uncompromising and utterly devoid of false bonhomie, Boleslawski made this at almost the same time as the screwball classic, THEODORA GOES WILD.
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not just another 1930's Western
Red-1252 January 2019
Three Godfathers (1936) was directed by Richard Boleslawski.

This could have been just another 1930's Western film, but that's not how things turned out. Naturally, the movie is outdated, but the basic plot isn't.

Three outlaws rob a bank and escape. They are confronted with an impossible situation--a young infant who will die unless they get him back to the town from which they've just escaped.

The outlaws are portrayed by Chester Morris, Lewis Stone, and Walter Brennan. The two women who love one of the outlaws are played by Irene Hervey and Dorothy Tree.

Some readers may remember Walter Brennan. He was a superb character actor, who won three Oscars. For me, none of the other actors were people whose names I recognized.

Nonetheless, the actors were all solid professionals. They had long and relatively successful careers. (Tree's career was cut short because she was blacklisted by the House Un-American Activities Committee.) The fact is, although none of them were marquee stars, they all could act. The professionalism shows through each frame.

I liked this movie because it started hard and ended that way. The three outlaws didn't have hearts of gold. They robbed the bank just before Christmas, when the bank held money people were saving for buying presents. They shot people who got in their way. The younger man was basically a sociopath, with no scruples about anything. Not a charming gang. That's what made the film interesting.

This is seen as a Christmas movie, and that part isn't subtle. The town they rob is called New Jerusalem. The film is set right before Christmas. Three men find a young child in the desert.

Nevertheless, the movie is realistic and moving. We saw it on a small screen. Probably it would work better in a theater, but I've never seen it screened. So, small screen is how you'll see it.

It's not a great film, but it's an excellent film. It has aged well, and is worth watching. I recommend it.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Much sadder version than 1948
HotToastyRag5 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Remember that adorable movie where John Wayne takes care of a baby in the middle of the desert? Did you know that the 1948 Three Godfathers is a remake? Did you know that the 1936 version is also a remake? Just how many versions are there? Three Godfathers has been filmed in 1916, 1919, 1930, 1936, and 1948. This has got to be an incredible story for Hollywood to keep remaking it.

Like A Star Is Born, which has also received far too many Hollywood remakes, Three Godfathers is a very simple story. Three outlaws find a dying mother with a newborn baby in the desert, and their humanity appears as they care for the child. Each version has its own take on the characters, and some use certain aspects of the plot that others omit, but it's the same basic principle: even bad guys have hearts.

I saw the 1948 version first, and while I maintain it's the best, I was unprepared that it was the lightest version, as it's quite sad. I found out the hard way that the other versions are even sadder! Depending on how much you like the cast of which version you rent, you might find yourself reaching for the Kleenex box.

In the 1936 version, the three outlaws are Chester Morris, Lewis Stone, and Walter Brennan. The introduction is very long, as the three bank robbers infiltrate a town, stake out the bank, and finally leave in a hail of gunfire. Chester is the evil leader of the group, and dressed all in black, he rattles off poisonous one-liners with every breath. Lew and Walter are the nice ones, and when they finally come across the orphaned baby in the desert, they want to take care of it. Chester suggests putting the kid out of his misery, and Lew is forced to buy the baby's share of drinking water with his share of the bank loot. Throughout the entire movie, Chester is an irredeemable villain who hates the baby. It's really impossible to like him. Lew is clearly the nice one, but his elegance is a bit of out of place in the desert. Walter is lovably dumb, but if you think you might get attached to either one of them, you might not want to rent this version. Or you can go ahead, but bring your Kleenexes. And also make allowances for a very old movie that feels like it might have been the first talking picture. This doesn't feel like it was made the same year as The Charge of the Light Brigade or San Francisco.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Tougher, truer than the John Wayne/John Ford version
WoodrowTruesmith2 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: Spoilers for two versions below:

This film was a revelation.

Ford's 1948 Technicolor version, scripted by Laurence Stallings and Frank S. Nugent, while action-filled and pretty, is a lesser film which pulls its punches, pushes its performances, and is shot through with sentimentality. Ford's mellower mood is certainly understandable, as he opens his film with a visual dedication to his recently-deceased friend Harry Carey, Sr., a veteran of Ford's films who had starred in a silent version of this tale; and the film is Harry Jr.'s first role for Ford.

Edward E. Paramore Jr. and Manuel Seff's 1936 script, directed by Richard Boleslawski, is tougher minded, which makes its antihero's change of heart truly moving. Unlike John Wayne's likable, harmless Bob Hightower, Chester Morris's Bob Sangster is a cold, dangerous brute who still manages to redeem himself, giving up his life to save a stranger's baby. Wayne's character, by contrast, gives up only a year of his life, in jail.

There's the remarkably dark, unnerving moment after Stone and Brennan depart the story, when Morris prepares to abandon the squalling infant on the desert. He yells for the kid to shut up. The baby keeps wailing offscreen, so Morris turns back, aims his pistol and fires. The crying immediately stops. Then the camera reveals that Morris has just shot a rattlesnake that was endangering the child. An unforgettable scene for any era, especially the heavily censored 1930s. This, and Morris's wrenching sacrifice at the climax, are far more powerful than anything Ford attempts in his "3 Godfathers."
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What a well-behaved baby
AAdaSC25 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen this version and the earlier 1929 version called "Hell's Heroes". The earlier film is better. I understand that there is also a John Wayne version from 1948 which I will steer well clear of after reading reviews of it being overly sentimental and ending differently. Of course, if it has John Wayne, there is no way he is gonna die!

This film is ok as it stands. There are 4 outlaws who ride into a goody two-shoes God-fearing town called New Jerusalem and one gets shot fleeing the bank robbery that they carry out. The remaining 3 get saddled with a baby whilst on the run and decide to take it back to the town they have just robbed. Things don't go to plan in this story of redemption.

Chester Morris (Bob) is good as the mean guy whilst Lewis Stone (Doc) is likable as the educated, wise older man of the trio. However, Walter Brennan (Gus) is warm as he usually is but annoying as he also usually is. He plays the comedy character with a grating voice. The film is a bit too over-the-top with its theme and too obvious and has a few scenes at the beginning that string things out a little unnecessarily.

The earlier version bonds the 3 lead characters more tightly together as they witness the death of the mother of the baby who makes them all agree to be the godfathers, hence the three godfathers. There is no such scene in this version. It's still an ok film, though.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Forgotten 1930's Classic Western With Gripping Central Performance
museumofdave11 November 2020
In 1929 actor Chester Morris was nominated for an Oscar for his strong performance as an ex-con in Alibi; he spent a good deal of his life playing tough-guy roles, too often typecast in second-tier "B" roles; here, some six years later, he gives a dynamic, believable turn as the bad boy of the town, the man in black who revels in his nastiness, unredeemed by the love of a good woman or anyone else. He and two others pal up together to rob a bank during a church social, and run for the hills, there discovering a dying woman with a child; this could be a really silly melodramatic set-up, but director Richard Boleslawski knows what he is doing, knows how much melodrama to inject into a situation, is able to focus two of the best scene stealers in the business, Walter Brennan and Lewis Stone into producing distinctively compelling characters. This film is a remake of several silent versions, the most notable starring Charles Bickford in the Chester Morris role (and later, more sentimentally, by John Wayne in a color version from John Ford), but the sense of authenticity in the town scenes and the visually arresting desert scenery give the actors a canvas which they do not fail to brilliantly fill in. How often does a character in a Western film recite Macbeth's "Tomorrow" soliloquy from memory, or discuss the intricacies of Schopenhauer with a friendly but uncomprehending cowpoke? Lewis Stone manages a nice turn in his interchanges with Walter Brennan, himself putting the brakes on his usual cornball rustic. The transformation for Chester Morris from unregenerate bum to something admirable is powerfully done, and the intrusion of some 1930's sentiment not entirely unwelcome. In 1936, the Best Oscar nominees were Paul Muni, Spencer Tracy, Gary Cooper, William Powell and Walter Huston; with a better agent, Chester Morris might have been among them.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A near miss
pmtelefon28 December 2020
There is a lot good stuff in "Three Godfathers". The movie has a good look to it and it has a strong cast but the storytelling does take a few dips at times. The movie feels a little longer than its short running time (81 mins). None of the negatives are deal breakers. It's just that "Three Godfathers" has the making of a really good movie. It hits the target but just misses the bullseye.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Harrowing trip across the desert with a baby and not enough water.
cgvsluis23 March 2022
I thought this film would be more three men and a baby and I couldn't have been more wrong. Three bank robbers come across a deadman being eaten by buzzards and then his horseless wagon that has his sick wife and baby in it. The mother dies leaving this baby...and after they blew up the watering hole with dynamite. Two of the three criminals wants to save the baby, the third who is the youngest and most heartless dies not. This becomes a harrowing trip across the desert on foot with little and then no water...in which they have to go back to the town they robbed.

The breakdown of these criminals and the erosion into humanity is interesting. This film was so dry, I needed a drink of water! Might have been a little heavy handed on the morality, but still enjoyable. Western.

"Nice fellow, Bob. Such a strict utilitarian."-Doc.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Well done western that doesn't show its age
bradmoore27 April 2007
I stumbled across this movie in the wee hours of the morning and was riveted by the story and acting. Chester Morris whom I had never heard of was excellent as the cold blooded gunman and of course Walter Brennan put in his usual excellent work. I had a hard time believing it was made in 1936 it has aged well in comparison to most westerns made before the fifties. All three main characters were excellent and the story moved at a good pace with a good twist at the end. I would recommend this movie to any fan of westerns and hope to catch it again so I can tape it................9 out of 10. I hope I can find this on a decent DVD print as it would be a most welcome addition to any western fans collection.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Third sound version
jabboreid29 December 2020
This is the best of the 3 sound versions. There is another version called Hells Heroes with Charles Bickford, Raymond Hatten and Fred Kohler. Tough movie like the Chester Morris version. I thought that the popular John Wayne version was weak after watching the first two movies
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Where you start has nothing' to do with where you finish".
classicsoncall25 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Here's a true diamond in the rough - consider all the John Wayne westerns made for Lone Star Pictures from 1933 to 1935 and not one of them matches "Three Godfathers" for story quality, character development and the strength of it's acting. Each of the outlaws who earn 'godfather' status by virtue of their roles in the story do an exceptional job in portraying their characters. For most viewers, it's easy enough to identify with Doc Underwood (Lewis Stone) as the well read and philosophical bank robber, along with Walter Brennan's Gus Barton, a codger with a heart of gold underneath a veneer of dust. The real low down no account skunk of the bunch though is Bob Sangster, ably portrayed by Chester Morris. It would be easy enough to dislike Sangster based simply on his role as the lead villain, and that's even before you see how he manhandles the baby in a couple of scenes. You know, that had to be a tough little toddler; kind of makes you feel like he could have taken on the old rattler himself.

You don't really need the Christmas connection in the story to make the whole thing work, but that was kind of a neat touch as it all plays out. I was impressed that the film makers thought enough about the theme to hang a 'Merry Christmas' sign in the New Jerusalem saloon, and have Sangster deny Santa Claus as he shoots banker Frank Benson (Robert Livingston) during the bank robbery.

Say, was Walter Brennan ever young? This might be the earliest film I've ever seen him in, and he looked like he could have been Grandpa McCoy here if he had to. I got a kick out of the way he handled the asparagus after playing out the gimmick of using a different name with everyone he met. His best exchanges occurred during his conversations with Doc Underwood, and I was surprised to hear him call Doc a 'lunger' due to the fact that he coughed a lot. Speaking of which, this might be the earliest film in which a link between smoking too many cigarettes and poor health might actually have been made. Just another curiosity the film has to offer.

You know what scene really hooked me? You have Doc going through the motions of writing a proper will for Gus in case he doesn't make it, but later in the story it actually turns out to be a message for Bob. I've never seen as good a hook in a picture from the Thirties, and it really made me appreciate the way the writers handled the characters.

I know John Wayne played the lead role in the 1948 re-make of this story, one I haven't seen yet but intend to. I see most reviewers in this forum prefer this earlier version, and based on what I've read, I probably will too. The film offers real characters in intense situations and allows its principles to wax philosophical about life and death and other matters in between. Rare even today, but considering the era, this film is a genuine treat.

Say, how about this for an odd coincidence. Villain Bob's floozie bar fly girlfriend was named Blackie, and beginning in 1941, Chester Morris gained prominence for a character he began to portray in more than a dozen films - as detective Boston Blackie!
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A western reminiscent of Damon Runyon
itsmits18 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The 1936 version of "The Three Godfathers" may be compared to the 1948 remake in somewhat the same manner as the 1940 "Love Affair" is often compared to the 1957 "An Affair To Remember". A black and white classic is remade in Technicolor with the advantage of advanced technology. Here the comparisons part company. The director of the original film gave way to a much more noted director and the lead role gave way to a much bigger box office draw. The biggest divergence came with the climax. This 1936 version opted to remain faithful to the author. The later version appeared to succumb to preview popularity.

When one mentions the name Chester Morris, most old timers will respond with 'Boston Blackie'. But with this role and his subsequent appearance in the classic "Five Came Back", he has managed to edge into the book of classics.

Lewis Stone and Walter Brennan play wonderfully off of each other although the former seems to have the lion's share of lines.

Irene Hervey is the brief love interest. Miss Hervey was known more popularly as Mrs. Allan Jones, the mother of Jack Jones.

Sidney Toler appears briefly prior to his succession to the role of Charlie Chan.

This film does not have the grittiness of the 1930 "Hell's Heroes" nor the slickness of the 1948 version but because of its tautness and faithfulness to the author's intent, it is a very satisfactory experience. One is left with a feeling of 'all's right with the world'. To fully appreciate P.B. Kyne's novella, watch this version before the 1948 version and also the 1930 version('Hell's Heroes') if you can catch it.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Great Western
tthomas-3822 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this a very long time ago (sometime in the early 60's, and I think I was about 10 years old). It made me cry at the end, and I recall feeling embarrassed about that, but I always remembered it, and when I joined Netflix, I figured I'd track it down. I knew it was black-and-white, so when I started watching the John Ford, John Wayne version, I realized it wasn't the same film.

Sure enough, the characters and the ending were nothing like this one, the original (talkie, since I gather there was also a silent version that preceded this one). Even though it was over 40 years ago, I vividly remember the scene at the waterhole, and the last of the bad men stumbling into that dusty little town on the edge of the desert. I didn't understand it fully at the time, but it was probably my first exposure to the idea that good and evil can coexist in the human soul.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sad, Heartening and Refreshingly Simple
the_mysteriousx30 March 2022
Three Godfathers is a wonderful little (for MGM) film that keeps its' story simple and to the heart. Three bank robbers find a woman dying in the desert and as she dies they decide to save her baby to the risk of their own lives. This is also the third of four versions of this story; with each filmed over a 32 year span with each film well-documenting the growth of the quality of filmmaking technology and technique in that era. The 1916 silent version, which is lost, demonstrates the early years of 3 act narrative film storytelling. The 1929 version shows the then-brand new sound technology; this 1936 film illustrates sound production entering its' prime years with a musical score and more fluid camera work and the 1948 version shows off color photography, which was starting to become the norm for the industry going into the 1950s. It can be said this story, based on a book, is a true stalwart of old-Hollywood and I would argue it would be welcomed to a remake in the 21st Century.

The actors and simple, but impactful direction make the film. Richard Boleslawski, who would sadly die a year later, directs with an abundant use of close-ups for that time. This lets the actors have their moments, and they come through in spades. Chester Morris is the lead and the least moral of the bank robbers. He plays Bob, a man angered by the people in the town, whose bank he is robbing. He is motivated to get back at the town which despises him and the girl who refused him, Molly (Irene Hervey), and he leads the robbery, shooting her new fiancé on his way out of the robbery. He isn't a very sympathetic character until the second half when he must decide what he will do with the helpless baby. Morris is interesting to watch and the depths of depravity in his character are well-played when he tries to pray as he has to face his fate in the end. Lewis Stone is simply outstanding as Doc, an old man who knows his time is short and quickly decides the money he got in the robbery isn't worth a thing compared to the life of the child. He takes on the full responsibility as long as he can and you can read in the melancholy in Stone's acting how his character is at peace with his fate when he looks into the baby's face. Walter Brennan, too, is excellent, as the simple-minded Gus, a middle-aged man, who is good friends with Doc and believes in him and takes on the responsibility too, of feeding and caring for the child at the expense of his own life.

This could be certainly called sentimental, and it is, but the story is so simple, that the sentimentality naturally comes out of it. Any human being with an ounce of morality, who would come upon a helpless baby, would do anything to save it. It's a part of our nature. What is great about this film is watching how each character faces the circumstances he is in and how he reacts to the constantly dangerous scenario of running out of water and being too far from safety in the scorching desert and the sacrifices they have to make with such limitations. The story takes place at Christmas, which makes the three main characters' redemption a religious allegory as they save the child, valuing the promise of an innocent over themselves. Doc's philosophical nature also lends this film to being much more thoughtful than your average western. The mixing of the brutality of the old west, with religion and philosophy give this a heartening feeling. Highly recommended to fans of simple, effective and emotional storytelling.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
More melodramatic than the great 1929 version but grittier than the 1948 version
jamesrupert201423 December 2021
Three desperados on the run after a deadly bank robbery stumble across a dying women and her baby left alone in the desert when her husband wandered off in a futile attempt to find water. This is the second sound version of Peter B. Kyne's tale quasi-biblical fable of infants and salvation in the cruel (and beautifully filmed) desert. Unlike the bare-bones 1929 version, this retelling opens with a lengthy and somewhat uninteresting preamble about tough-guy Bob Sangster (Chester Morris) returning to the town of New Jerusalem before the murderous robber unites with his crew to rob the local bank. The titular three are well portrayed but are somewhat clichéd (Sangster is in classic bad-guy head-to-toe black), Doc (Lewis Stone, who is very good in the role) is an erudite scholar from out East 'gone bad', and Gus (Walter Brennan) is a borderline comic sidekick (Brennen also very good)). Like the 1929 version, this telling is more bleak and powerful than the somewhat softened and sentimental John Wayne version (1948), but it has much more of a 'Hollywood Western' look than the gritty vérité of the earlier version. That said, they are all good and if you want to spend some Christmas time in a desert far from Bethlehem, with three men bearing Colts, not gifts, and an infant who can lead to salvation if not first bitten by a Gila monster, you can't go wrong with any version of Kyne's hot and dusty parable (sadly, the silent versions starring Harry Carey are lost).
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Possibly deserves a higher rating, but it's a long time since I've seen this one!
JohnHowardReid26 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Chester Morris (Bob Sangster), Lewis Stone ("Doc"), Walter Brennan (Gus), Sidney Toler (dentist), Robert Livingston (Frank), Dorothy Tree (Blackie), Irene Hervey (Molly), Jean Kirchner (baby), Joseph Marievsky (Pedro), Willard Robertson (Rev. McLane), Roger Imhof (sheriff), John Sheehan (Ed), Victor Potel (Buck), Helen Brown (Mrs Marshall), Virginia Brissac (Mrs McLane), Harvey Clark (Marcus Treen).

Director: RICHARD BOLESLAWSKI. Screenplay: Edward E. Paramore Jr, Manuel Seff, Joseph L. Mankiewicz. Based on the 1913 novel by Peter B. Kyne. Photography: Joseph Ruttenberg. Editor: Frank Sullivan. Music: Dr William Axt. Costumes: Dolly Tree. Producer: Joseph L. Mankiewicz.

Copyright 4 March 1936 by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp. New York opening at the Rialto: 8 March 1936. U.S. release: 7 March 1936. Australian release: 10 June 1936. 82 minutes. TV title: MIRACLE IN THE SAND.

NOTES: An "A" production, shooting from 27 November 1935 to 3 January 1936. Mankiewicz's debut as a producer.

Other versions of the popular Kyne novel are: Broncho Billy and the Baby (1909), Marked Men (1919), Hell's Heroes (1929), 3 Godfathers (1948), and The Godchild (1974).

COMMENT: Every version has its admirers, but this well-produced enactment of Kyne's parable-like novel, with its witty script, stylish direction, atmospheric music score, superb photography and excellent acting, is a credit to all concerned.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
TRUE DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH
tcchelsey18 June 2023
THANK YOU to the MOVIES TV NETWORK for resurrecting this outstanding western slash drama, long in the shadow of the famous John Wayne film (of the same title). This got air play years ago on tv, then disappeared, largely due to countless film tributes to Wayne. The 1936 version is much more dramatic and poignant, and tall, dark and handsome 30s movie idol Chester Morris is the whole show. Usually Morris was cast in more romantic or detective features, and actually was compared to the comic strip hero DICK TRACY (later starring as BOSTON BLACKIE in the 40s), but he truly makes the most of his screen time, the part of a two fisted bank robber! He and partners Lewis Stone and Walter Brennan hold up a desert town bank, only to confront a dying woman and her baby. She passes and the kid is all theirs -- in the middle of nowhere, necessitating a trip back to the town they just ravaged? Oustanding on location work at Red Rock Canyon, California, bordering the treacherous Mojave desert, of all places. Richard Boleslawski directed this masterfully for MGM and got just what he wanted from the stars. Beautiful Irene Hervery co-stars as Molly (with an eye for Morris, naturally), and look for pre-Charlie Chan Sidney Toler as the professor.

The ending will stay with you. A must see for both Morris and Boleslawski completists. Boleslawski next directed the comedy classic THEODORA GOES WILD with Irene Dunne. Now and dvd, and rightly so.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Few More To See
cartjos30 June 2023
Great movie. Not knocking the John Wayne version, but this is so much better. Walter Brennan at his best, really appreciated Chester Morris for the first time, and for me discovering Lewis Stone as more than an accessory. I will hold judgement to this being the best version until I see the 1929 one starring Charles Bickford. I most likely will never get to see the two silent ones, both with Harry Carey, It is a B&W film and that is a plus, I can't imagine it being as good in color. Happy ending in one way and unhappy in a few ways, which makes it feel all the more real. Oh yeah, that baby is a cute as any that ever came out of Hollywood.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent Film
p_jr21 June 2023
This movie is a classic way beyond sone of the later versions .

There was also a silent version as well as a 1913 and 1916 versions . One had a different name . I'm not sure why one of the early versions have been practically forgotten .

It was neat that Harry Carey Jr played the role that his father had played in this version .

John Ford was a master director who got the very best from his actors .

I was interested to see Walter Brennen in this version and he still looked like an older man although he was quite young.

I wish that I could have read the book to see how closely the movie and the other movies stayed true to the book. I also loved the desert scenes scenes that Director Ford was so well know for .
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed