Bataan (1943) Poster

(1943)

User Reviews

Review this title
49 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
One of the 1940s best war movies.
hitchcockthelegend16 March 2010
World War II and it's the Bataan peninsula. 13 members of the US armed forces, with Filipino volunteers, have been hastily assembled to blow up a bridge and delay Japanese attempts to rebuild it for as long as possible. As the Japanese close in from the surrounding jungle, the men must also battle with their own wills to have any hope of survival.

Lets get the complaints of others out the way first. Yes this is a studio shot production, yes there is model work involved, and yes this is unashamedly a flag waving, chest thumping, rally call of heroism. Based around actual events, this is a fictionalised telling that also has no shame in being disparaging towards the Japanese in the film. Now are these things really a problem? This is after all 1943, a time when the US was struggling in the Pacific conflict. A loose copy of John Ford's 1934 film The Lost Patrol, Bataan served as a moral booster for the public back home. The message is clear, this may be tantamount to a suicide mission, because, well, war is indeed hell, but sacrifices are necessary to achieve the bigger freedom objective.

Nicely directed by Tay Garnett {The Postman Always Rings Twice} and tightly scripted by Robert Hardy Andrews {The Cross of Lorraine}, the film stars Robert Taylor, George Murphy, Thomas Mitchell, Robert Walker, Desi Arnaz & Lloyd Nolan. Violent and brutal for its time {the hand to hand bayonet sequences are brilliantly realised}, Bataan is also notable for portraying a racially integrated fighting force having to come together for the greater good. This group of men are a mixed bunch, different backgrounds, different races and different classes. But they are in the same boat as the Japanese start to pick them off one by one, and not only that, but Malaria is in the camp as well. The tension is racked up, the atmosphere stifling, we the viewers are witness to a unique show of heroism as we live with these men during their last soul sapping days.

The cast do really well when one considers they are in fact playing disposable characters. Taylor in particular is effective as the tough Sergeant forced into command of the group. While some scenes such as a moodily staged camouflaged Japanese approach are truly memorable and linger long in the memory. The end also is terrific, one which puts one in mind of Sam Peckinpah watching and nodding approvingly. High on suspense and beating a real brave heart, Bataan is up with the best that the war genre of film has to offer. Belyng its budget restrictions it achieves its aims and then some. 8.5/10
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A big office film of its time, despite its studio jungles...
Nazi_Fighter_David19 September 2000
Bataan is a province, central Luzon, Philippines, sheltering Manila Bay from the South China Sea... It is largely covered by jungle and is traversed north to south by steep mountains...

After the Japanese invasion of the Philippines in December 1941 and the fall of Manila (January 2, 1942), the defending Americans and Filipinos withdrew to Bataan, foiling Japanese efforts to split the forces of U.S. General Douglas MacArthur... His troops fought a fierce delaying action until April 9, 1942, and remnants, led by Lieut. Gen. Jonathan M.Wainwright, escaped to Corregidor Island, where they surrendered about a month later...

On January 9, 1945, U.S. Forces, under MacArthur, landed at Lingayen Gulf to the north and sealed off the Bataan Peninsula... Landings were then made at Mariveles Harbor in the south and on Corregidor Island, thus securing Manila Bay for the U.S. Navy...

"Bataan" is the fictional story of 13 men who stayed behind, holding a bridge, and fighting to the death a rear guard action to ensure the success of the Allied forces retreat from the Philippines...

The audience live with the soldiers their last heroic days: George Murphy, an Air Force Lieutenant secretly reliable; Lloyd Nolan, the smart Corporal with compassionate qualities; Thomas Mitchell, a career NCO; Deni Arnaz, a friendly Spanish soldier; Barry Nelson, the competent Matowski; Lee Bowman, the Captain who falls with a bullet; Robert Walker (in his screen debut) who almost breaks down from homesickness; Kenneth Spencer, the black soldier with an undisturbed force and simple dignity, and Robert Taylor, the tough heroic Sergeant alive in the face of the enemy, who sets up his machine gun and keeps it firing until the end...

All are representatives of the heroism existing in all Americans, symbol of the heroic resistance...
41 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Unusual War Movie
ccthemovieman-110 April 2006
For a war movie, this was a bit unusual in that almost the whole film took part in one place. You could almost make a play out of this. A group of men stay in one area trying to sabotage a bridge so the Japanese can't use it to transport supplies. Meanwhile, they have to fend off attacks by the enemy. The closing scenes feature that attack and some are quite brutal.

At least half of the story is not action but melodramatic looks at the soldiers, particularly of the squad's sergeant leader Robert Taylor and one of his men who has an attitude problem: Lloyd Nolan. We also get some shorter profiles of combat men played by Robert Walker, Thomas Mitchell and Desi Arnez (yes, Lucy's husband).

The special effects are more than passable considering they weren't too advanced in the film industry compared to today's technology. However, credibility was a little thin as those Japanese soldiers died awfully fast in those combat scenes at the end. I swear I saw several of them drop over before anyone hit them!

Taylor was the best in this movie "army" and Walker was the annoying character, playing an extremely young and generally stupid Navy guy (don't ask) who never stopped talking in this irritating voice. Other than his character, this was a tough, no-nonsense war movie.
31 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Taylor shines in gritty war film...Robert Walker's debut...
Doylenf16 February 2002
BATAAN is one of the better war films to come out during the war years of World War II. Robert Taylor holds the whole gritty film together with his realistic depiction of a sergeant leading a small troop of men in an effort to hold back the Japanese attack by blowing up a crucial bridge. Taylor, Robert Walker as a gum-chewing homesick sailor, Lloyd Nolan, Dezi Arnaz (surprisingly effective in a dramatic role) and others make splendid contributions. Special mention should be made of Philip Terry's medic--an under-appreciated actor who is shown as committed to his job in a selfless way but finally going berserk under the pressures of war. (He had other good roles in Olivia de Havilland's TO EACH HIS OWN and Ray Milland's THE LOST WEEKEND).

The jungle setting (although filmed on the studio lot) is impressive with its exotic foliage and adds to the realism. The hand to hand combat scenes are well staged, as are the final moments of the film.

All in all, a gripping war film that more than holds its own with contemporary stories like SAVING PRIVATE RYAN.

Has to be appreciated in the context of its time--when flag-waving patriotism was at its peak and lines like "Those dirty Japs" were not considered politically incorrect.
30 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classical warfare movie with an excellent Rober Taylor and it is well set in South Pacific
ma-cortes8 June 2007
The film talks about the Pacific battle , during WWII , concerning the defenders of Bataan but Japan has just invaded . A small group of soldiers (Thomas Mitchell , LLoyd Nolan , Desi Arnaz , among others) flee from Japanese repeatedly attack and they head for blowing-up a bridge on the Bataan location and their final destination : Corregidor . The captain (Lee Bowman) dies and the top-sergeant (Robert Taylor) takes command along with an Airbone lieutenant (George Murphy). The military unit surrounded by the Japanese in a foggy set , lush jungle and progressively dwindling group . The defenders gave a few days for posterior victories and future US conquest like Midway , Island Salomon and Bismark . The Bataan of the film's title refers to both the World War II Battle of Bataan and the place Bataan which is a Central Luzon region province on Luzon island in the Philippines which occupies the whole of the Bataan Peninsula on the island . This movie's dedication states that it is dedicated to the heroes of Bataan.

This classic warlike movie is nicely starred by Robert Taylor at one of his best roles as a tough sergeant , he's accompanied by a plethora of first-rate secondaries . This exciting actioner warfare completed with slice of military stereotypes although some characters are very one-dimensional , as well as presenting an African American in an intelligent and sympathetic manner , attempting to avoid any racial speeches in the script . The original plot belongs to ¨Lost patrol¨ (1934) by John Ford , whose screenplay has been pretty imitated and remade many times but it's still a magnificent entertainment . In fact , Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer paid RKO a lot of money for the right to use scenes from Lost patrol in this movie . As ¨Lost patrol¨ was subsequently remade and reworked several times : ¨Sahara¨ (by Zoltan Korda) with scenarios in Libya desert ; ¨Last of Comanches¨ (Andre De Toth) in California desert ; and even part of ¨Flight of Phoenix¨ (Robert Aldrich) in Sahara desert , and , of course , this ¨Bataan¨(Tay Garnett) in Philippines jungle . This is one of a handful of feature films that have featured the story of the World War II Battle of Bataan , they include ¨So proudly we hail¡¨ by Mark Sandrich (1943) ; ¨They were expendable¨ (1945) by John Ford and ¨Back to Bataan¨ (1945) by Edward Dmytryck . The film is set into a lush , abundant jungle with a dense fog made by usual Metro Goldwin Mayer production designer , Cedric Gibbons , and it contains an atmospheric as well as thrilling musical score by Bronislau Kaper . The motion picture was professionally directed by Tay Garnett, a good Hollywood craftsman.

The actual deeds about Bataan concern an unsuccessful attempt by US and Filipino troops under General Douglas MacArthur to defend the peninsular against the Japanese 1 Jan-9 April 1942 . Following the surrender of Bataan , MacArthur was evacuated , but Allies captives were force-marched 95 km/60 mi to the nearest railhead in the Bataan Death March,ill-treatment by the Japanese guards during the march killed about 16.000 US and Filipino troops .
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good one for Veteran's Day
lastliberal11 November 2007
There is no big action in this film. It could easily be a play. It is, however, a great story of 13 heroic men who stood against impossible odds to do their duty. In that sense, it is a good film for Veteran's day. Most of the soldiers in WWII did not do Audie Murphy style heroics, but did their duty and hung in there to aid in the war effort. The efforts here were of extreme importance and the men died with honor.

Tough guy Robert Taylor stars, and there is a great performance by Desi Arnaz.

The crazy/heroic ending may be trite, but it was good.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Simple but effective genre movie
rmax30482329 May 2004
Actually it's a kind of remake of John Ford's "Lost Patrol" only this time in the jungles of the Bataan peninsula. A mixed group of men with varied background are pinned down by the enemy and picked off one by one in colorful ways.

Characters and incidents are out of a comic book. This is not a subtle movie. If you want a greater dose of something resembling reality, try "Pride of the Marines" or "Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo" or "They Were Expendable." This is the kind of thing that passed for uplifting entertainment in 1943. But, given the usual strictures of the genre and the times, it's fairly well done. The shooting was done in a studio and looks it. The model work looks like model work too. But, again, if you don't expect too much in the way of authenticity it's engaging. The plastic bushes and the layer of studio-generated fog give the film an eerie reality of its own.

To be engaged, though, you must put up with things like there being no question of pulling out or surrendering. We fight to the last man. And there is a brutal battle towards the end in which both sides charge with bayonets. We litter the ground with Japanese dead while they manage to kill only two of our men. We shoot them, grenade them, bayonet them, strangle them, stab them, and the air is filled with flying body parts, all Japanese.

The Japanese are referred to as "Japs," "baboons", "monkeys" (twice), "rats", and "animals" (in case we hadn't got the point yet). If they capture one of our guys they "work him over good" before putting him out of his misery.

There's a certain historical truth in much of this. Bataan was an exhausting conflict. American and Philippine troops defended the peninsula until forced to surrender, and many of them died from wounds, illness, and malnutrition. If I recall, the Japanese, under General Yamashita, were in almost as bad a shape. And of course the infamous death march to the prison camps doomed many of the captives. A good number of the victims were from a unit formed near Deming, New Mexico, where a small memorial has been built.

There is nothing much worth saying about the acting. Not much acting is called for. The black soldier has a terrific baritone. Robert Walker turns in a nice performance as a wimpy sailor/musician, although he too is allowed to kill a number of enemy soldiers in hand-to-hand combat. Thomas Mitchell doesn't come across as a Jake Feingold. Desi Arnaz is one of those non-native speakers of English who use a lot of jazzy lingo when they talk. (Amusing.) Loyd Nolan is the most interesting character and gives by far the most droll performance. "That really bothers me, what you think." The best that can be said for Robert Taylor (b. Spangler Arlington Borough) is that he doesn't get in the way of the scenery. He began his career at MGM in the 1930s as a handsome leading man. As he grew older his features coarsened, as features will, but MGM kept him soldiering away in epics and ever cheaper features. His acting didn't change much.

There's a curious and coincidental aspect to the casting here. Of the men in the patrol, three are San Franciscans: Barry Nelson, Loyd Nolan, and Philip Terry (the medic). One of those random juxtapositions whose likelihood can only be pinpointed by use of the Poisson distribution. After all, San Francisco has always been a small city, at the time these actors were born, probably no more than 500,000. The reason Loyd Nolan sounds like a New Yorker is because so many New Yorkers came to San Francisco in the 19th century and settled in the Mission District, as part of what sociologists call a chain migration. You can still hear the remnants of that New York accent in elderly San Franciscans today.
16 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good early WWII action
papajim16 July 2003
Robert Taylor gives a gritty performance as the leader of a thrown together unit fighting a delaying action during the fall of the Philipines. Lloyd Nolan does a good job as a professional soldier with a past, Thomas Mitchell is good as the older career soldier, perhaps a bit out of shape from years of peace time duty. Robert Walkers portrayal of a young homesick sailor is a good start on his career. This 1943 movie features some of the best hand to hand combat scenes to come out of any war movie, regardless of era. The exhaustion afterwards is strikingly realistic. This movie, dialogue included, is patriotic. At the time of Bataan, there wasn't much good news as the US had suffered some devastating defeats. The characters, regardless of race or creed, are treated equally which is a real plus for that time. I first saw this movie in a theatre when I was 9, (and yes, after the movie was over, the house lights came on and the ushers passed thru the audience selling War Stamps). I liked the movie then, and like it even more now. I give it a 9.

NOTE: A previous persons comment stated that they were not even wearing American helmets. In fact, the helmets worn in the movie ARE correct for the American Army in the early 1940's.
52 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A strong entry into Hollywood's WWII propaganda movies; solid performances by Robert Taylor and Lloyd Nolan
Terrell-415 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This well-acted, tough World War II propaganda movie is an excellent example of the MGM style: Solid production values, some good acting...and a tendency to hit the message out of the ball park, and then hit it out again. And again. The story of a small group of soldiers fighting and dying to buy time for MacArthur to regroup around Bataan was, I suspect, a powerful movie when it came out in 1943. Now, it's a curious mixture of Hollywood theatrics mixed with some genuinely moving moments. At nearly two hours, it also goes on too long. For those who may believe that brave men can survive in propaganda war movies, read no further.

It's early 1942 in the Philippines and Sergeant Bill Dane (Robert Taylor) with a mixed bag of semi-volunteers are given the assignment of blowing up a bridge which would otherwise be a primary crossing point for the invading Japanese army as it races south. They must also set up a defensive position across the chasm to keep the Japanese from rebuilding. Dane is a competent, no-nonsense Army lifer. The only other regular Army men he has is Corporal Jake Finegold (Thomas Mitchell), a wise old hand and long-time friend, and Corporal Barney Todd (Lloyd Nolan), a cynic who may have a history with Dane. The other ten men include an enthusiastic Navy corpsman, an engineer, an air force pilot, a medic and a supply corporal. The story line is simple. As we learn about these men and their histories, the Japanese pick them off one by one. And as they die, the dedication of the remaining men only grows stronger. We're left with the image of a row of graves barely visible as ground fog sweeps among them, with the rifles of the dead men thrust into the ground as headstone markers. Then the movement of Japanese soldiers creeping in for the final attack...with Sergeant Dane, exhausted and wounded, the last remaining man, rising to his feet, clutching his machine gun and blazing away at the charging enemy. "Come on, suckers," he screams, "come and get it! We're still here! We'll always be here!"

The cast is small and gets smaller. Demographically, it matches Hollywood's idea of America. There's an Hispanic, a black, a Jew, a misfit, a young kid, a Philippine scout, a...well, you get the idea. Thomas Mitchell as Corporal Finegold plays his patented role of giving us some of the movie's messages. When early in the movie Dane bemoans how unprofessional his group of soldiers is, Finegold just says, "You can't always tell, sergeant. Some of those kids learn pretty quick and kinda good." Later, when Dane is discouraged and says, "I wonder how long these guys can stand up to this stuff," Corporal Finegold says to Dane (and to the theater goers), "Those kids signed up for this just like you and me. They'll get tired, sure. Things'll get tough, sure. But I don't think they'll put their tails between their legs and run anymore than you would." Robert Walker in his first credited film role plays the very young, gum- chewing corpsman. It's wise to remember that in propaganda movies it can be fatal to start dictating a letter home to your Mom. George Murphy plays the pilot who manages to get his bi-wing aircraft off but is wounded in the process. As with the other men, he chooses to die heroically. Even a conscientious objector who signed on as a non-combat medic winds up throwing grenades. Robert Taylor and Lloyd Nolan are particularly effective.

I couldn't help but admire the professionalism of the movie. Yet knowing the men are going to get picked off, combined with the length of the movie, had me tensing every time someone decided to stand up, write a letter, peer over a sandbag, talk about his life back home or sing a spiritual. The tension is effective for the first hour, but after a while it got to be a strain. The one face-to-face fight towards the end of the movie, when Japanese soldiers camouflaged to look like brush and bushes begin to move toward the remaining men, and the men respond first with machine guns and then with bayonets, was a relief. It also was a brutal look at hand-to-hand combat.

It's hard to beat war propaganda that lets us see average men and women gladly dying for a cause nobler than their own lives. At that level, the movie works. Bataan may be dated, but if you enjoy older war movies you might like this one.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best of the 'last stand' movies.
bkoganbing30 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
In addition to Bataan being one of the finest World War II films ever done, it also marked the final transformation of Robert Taylor from romantic leading man to tough action star. After this one Taylor, NEVER got cast in any powder puff roles.

He's a tough, believable army sergeant who's in command of a squad that's been cobbled together from remnants of other squads and given a suicide rear guard mission to hold off the Japanese from taking and crossing a key bridge. Some of the other men of his squad are Lloyd Nolan, Thomas Mitchell, Robert Walker, Barry Nelson, Desi Arnaz. There's an army pilot with a plane to be repaired played by George Murphy and when Captain Lee Bowman is killed Taylor is in command.

So they hold the Japanese off, the Battle of Bataan in microcosm, hoping for aid that never came because the United States had no aid to give at that point. In the tradition of The Alamo, they all go down, one at a time.

Of the cast I'd single out Lloyd Nolan and Desi Arnaz. Nolan is another army veteran, a hardbitten hardcase almost a mirror image of Taylor. Their scenes have some real bite to them. But Lloyd Nolan was never bad in anything he ever did.

Desi Arnaz is quite a revelation. His accent is pretty thick, he never got to be a Latin Lover leading man like Fernando Lamas or Ricardo Montalban did. In fact that accent was part of his whole shtick with his wife later on in I Love Lucy. But Arnaz shows her he was capable of being far more than the patient but sometimes exasperated Ricky Ricardo. Too bad he never got more opportunities like Bataan.

No derring do heroics in Bataan. These are ordinary people of the greatest generation doing a job that had to be done.
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gritty WW2 movie
grantss23 December 2014
Gritty WW2 movie.

Focuses on a US unit during the early days of the US involvement in WW2. A small unit holds an important area in the US defenses, on the Bataan peninsular in the Philippines.

Very gritty in that no punches are pulled in the depiction of the war. No superman-like heroics. All quite realistic.

Being made in 1943, the film uses US weapons of the time of the battle, adding to the authenticity.

Good performance by Robert Taylor in the lead role. Decent supporting performances, though that of Robert Walker, as the sailor, is particularly irritating.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No Spoilers Here
telegonus2 October 2001
1943 audiences already knew how Bataan would end before they went to see the film, but they went anyway, since this Tay Garnett-directed combat picture is a rugged tribute to the 'expendable' men of the Philippines of 1942. I can't do better than James Agee's fine review when the movie came out, but would like to add a few things of my own.

Rather than try to show the entire evacuation and abandonment of the Phillipines, which would be perhaps overwhelmingly depressing, the film-makers decided to focus on one small, fictional incident that could, in effect, stand in for everything else. They chose wisely. What happens is that we watch a group of soldiers defend and then destroy a bridge, so as to slow down the Japanese army's advance, if only by a few hours, to buy precious time for everyone else. None of these men wants to be a hero. They're all stuck there, and would rather be someplace else. While some are more aggressive than others, no one is wholly brave; and though there is a good deal of nervousness and occasional cowardice, they all pull together admirably in the end.

Though filmed on the Culver City lot, the film cleverly and expressionistic ally suggests a tropical environment. As the story progresses the jungle gets foggier. It was never too inviting to begin with; by the movie's end it is absolutely forbidding.

The acting is variable. Some of the casting is peculiar. Thomas Mitchell plays a corporal named Feingold, but can't seem to get rid of the slight, American-style brogue that was so much a part of his screen persona. Desi Arnaz has a small role. There is a fairly straightforward presentation of a black man whose color is the least important thing about him. Robert Walker, in what I believe is his first film, has a showy role as a garrulous, yarn-spinning sailor. His character is, I imagine, supposed to be a typically charming, bumptious All-American boy, along the lines, perhaps, of Van Johnson. I find Walker,--who was an excellent actor--obnoxious in the part. Lloyd Nolan is tough as nails as a hard-case soldier with a dark past.

The movie's biggest asset in the acting department also happens to be its star: Robert Taylor. This pretty boy matinée idol gives a fine performance as the sergeant with a job no man in his right mind would want. And he is in his right mind. Taylor has no vanity in the part. He is as dirty and unshaven as everyone else in the cast, and at times shows flashes of depth and insight that are startling given his lightweight reputation. Taylor pulls the film together, with no Duke Wayne ostentation or posturing, and proves, like the film, to be stronger and truer to life than we might at first have imagined.
49 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bataan Brawl
writers_reign15 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
If you discount Robert Taylor, a contract artist, there's very little about this film that says MGM yet that was the studio responsible. Thomas Mitchell, aged fifty-one at the time was a tad long in the tooth even for a thirty-year man, Lloyd Nolan, who turned in arguably the best performance had strong ties to Paramount, George Murphy was a jobbing actor who followed the money, Robert Walker was just starting out and was not identified with any studio, likewise Desi Arnaz. Journeyman director Tay Garnett jobbed around though he did helm The Postman Always Rings Twice for MGM and so on. What we have here is our old-friend the Hollywood 'Bomber-Crew' movie in which a group of disparate people are thrown together due to circumstances beyond their control (in this case war) and told to just get on with it. Of it's type it's as good as any and better than some.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
bataan
mossgrymk19 March 2022
Interesting to compare and contrast this Tay Garnett film to Ford's "They Were Expendable", made two years later. Both concern themselves with the American defeat in the Phillipines in WW2 and the attitude in both toward the enemy is viscerally hostile. There the comparison ends.

The big difference between the two is that Ford's film is mostly commenting on the horrors of war from the vantage point of expected victory while Garnett's work, shot while the outcome of the war was still in doubt, is a product of such horror with its main, driving element being a corrosive and bitter racism toward the Japanese, an emotion which produced both Nagasaki and Manzanar.

I leave it to you to decide which is the better movie.

PS...Ironically, this film could not be shown in the American South because it was deemed insufficiently racist (i.e. A black soldier speaks over a white soldier's grave)
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Horrors of War
drmality-126 May 2005
My Mom saw this movie at the time it was released and said it gave her more nightmares than any horror film she ever saw. It is still violent today and must have been shockingly brutal back in the day.

Yes, you can say some of the soldiers are clichéd, but death is shown unflinchingly. Combat is portrayed as a bloody, messy, fatigue-inducing business. Boredom and endless waiting take their toll on nerves as well. The banter and cocky talk is whistling past the graveyard.

Lloyd Nolan's character is rough and unlikeable. He fights for freedom, but he fights dirty and he doesn't pretty things up with patriotic speeches. Some might complain about the black soldier playing harmonica and taking orders from white men. Actually, for the time, he was portrayed with dignity and shown to be as brave as any of the other soldiers. As for Robert Taylor, his weariness and resolve at the end are stirring and the last scene is not one you will soon forget.

Ignoring the propaganda aspects of the movie, the last half works as almost a pure horror movie, as our cast gets gruesomely picked off by unseen foes lurking in the jungle.

Exciting and gripping, it's easy to overlook the faults of this most violent and gritty of WW2 films made at the time.

"Bushido, Bushwa! You stink!" So died the heroes of Bataan...
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Postwar film
tmills77730 July 2005
This film is good for getting a picture of the feelings and actions taken in WWII. "Dirty Japs" was not a far-off-the-mark remark to make seeing what they did in Nanking, China, and to American POWs towards the end of the war with Japan. The new Benjamin Bratt film will delve into that and it will be interesting to see if "PC" shows its ugly head. Not to worry with this gritty action film with Robert Taylor, Loyd Nolan, and other tough second leads who made these movies so entertaining. Thomas Mitchell is a hopeless miscast as a Marine corporal. When the film was shot, TM was in his early fifties, and carrying around the remains of too many fine dining habits, but his performance was good nonetheless. Film is good as is without John Wayne.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A handful of American soldiers against uneven odds.
michaelRokeefe13 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
BATAAN is one of my very favorite war movies and is based on an actual endeavor in the Phillipines. Sgt. Bill Dane(Robert Taylor) leads a small platoon of thirteen devoted men in the mission of blowing up a pivotal bridge, the Japanese need to prolong their war efforts. The Japanese do not take their bridge being blown up lightly. Realistic WW2 combat scenes as a few brave men fight for survival in the South Pacific. Great ensemble cast featuring: George Murphy, Lloyd Nolan, Thomas Mitchell, Robert Walker, Desi Arnaz, Barry Nelson, Phillip Terry and Tom Dugan. One of my favorite scenes is when the enemy invades as a group of 'walking shrubs'. Plus the energy of Arnaz as he finds Tommy Dorsey on the radio. The finale is memorable as Taylor is berserk with desire to defend himself surrounded by the enemy. Thanks to AMC and TCM for showing this classic as much as they do.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One can always find a place to die.
dexter-1014 February 2001
The explicit message in this film is that in 1943 every American should sacrifice for the World War Two war effort. A small group of troops defending a bridge against the Japanese army is symbolic of the actual attempt to delay Japanese victory as long as possible--time as a weapon, according to the prologue. Yet, action war movies do not operate on logic, and some of the delaying tactics are highly unlikely. The rebuilding of an old plane while under attack Japanese attack is just one example of the illogic of Hollywood. In one sense, this film is little more than the Alamo replayed, this time in the Pacific instead of Texas. Still, the movie qualifies as a good propaganda film for the Homefront, especially since American forces were suffering their greatest defeats in the history of the Republic about the time of the fall of Bataan. Hollywood cannot turn defeat into victory, but it can claim, and does in this film, that the course of history was changed by the heroic defenders of Bataan. Like the Alamo, it does not "matter where a man dies as long as he dies for freedom." In war, one can always find a place to die.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
ONE OF THE BEST WAR FILMS EVER
Kirasjeri10 September 1999
This is one of the best war films of its era, and it is actually less anti-Japanese than many that came later, such as John Wayne's "Back to Bataan". But never forget the very real and common - and ubiquitous - Japanese atrocities, which they still are loathe to admit. Here, a small number of Americans are acting as a rear guard preventing the invading Japanese from driving south on Bataan in 1942. They have to blow a bridge and hold a ravine, and are subject to snipers, air attacks, and infantry assaults. It is superbly done with a great cast (Desi Arnaz was quite good too). Robert Taylor cast off forever his pretty boy image of the 1930's with Garbo in his very tough portrayal of the sergeant.

Most notably, "Bataan" stands out for perhaps the best and most violent hand-to-hand combat footage ever filmed, certainly the best of its era. Also, and often neglected in reviews, is that "Bataan" featured a fully INTEGRATED Army: a Jew, a black, an Hispanic, a Filipino, and so on. They were all treated equally and heroically. "Bataan" could not even be shown in parts of the South in the 1940's due to this. Only two other movies of the WW II period featured a black fighting bravely - "Sahara" and "Crash Dive", but none as well as here. "Bataan" is a marvelous film on many levels. A classic.
33 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
am a war film freak
rickdumesnil14 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
i have a collection of war movies and last week i came across BATAAN and omg i don't want to badly judge the film....but it didn't completely amazed me. the dialogue was infantile.....Robert Taylor was wooden except for the very last of the movie. its rare that in a film i feel don't feel sympathy and sadness for a character.....in BATAAN...just didn't have feelings for any of them. the cinematography is fair but was was all this fog about and the rocks and boulders in some scenes seemed like they were chisel-ed and meticulously placed on right spot. Na i hate criticizing a war film but this one didn't capture my heart. still a 7 is not bad for......Robert walker writing to his mom....Desi arnaz overjoyed to hear tommy Dorsey and first scene of Japanese attack. I'm relieved though.......my favourite film SO PROUDLY WE HAIL 1943.......got more stars. oh i forgot good actor thomas mitchell not a role for him at all.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Robert WALKER..........a total surprise
rickdumesnil-552034 January 2016
What is it with you people i just don't understand.Everyone is saying Robert walker was annoying and its pure bull. He is the typical young man....excited to be in the war.....excited to kill the enemy...sensitive and funny. Walkers acting was top notch.....the scene where he breaks down after writing a letter to mum....awesome. I looked at all his expressions in the film and they were so real...so authentic. Baatan is a good movie superb cast NOLAN TAYLOR...even DesiArnaz makes me wish he had done more of this type of role.A good ending splendid visual effect.....TAY Garnett did it again. This with So PROUDLY We Hail has got to be one of the greatest war movie ever.....and i also forgot the wonderful work of Thomas Mitchell and George Murphy. Bravo
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
average
SnoopyStyle13 June 2019
Japan has invaded the Philippines and the Americans are retreating with the refugees. A ragtag squad of soldiers from disparate units are tasked with demolishing an important bridge to cover the retreat.

There is a little too much talking and the people are moving a little too slowly. The Japs are coming. They need to move faster to blow up the bridge. The movie continues to have various issues. They have a fire behind them shining a light on their positions. They continue to have a lackadaisical attitude which defeats the tension of the situation. They don't dig fox holes. Their positions are too close together. The guys spend too much time sitting around and chatting. I get the story needed them to talk to each other but there is a lack of urgency. Once the Japanese get across from God knows where, it becomes an old western where the barbaric Indians get mow down. This is an average old fashion wartime war movie.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very effective propaganda war film
planktonrules20 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is a very good war film with so many excellent performances and wonderful writing. About the only strikes against it were that it tends to occasionally portray stereotypes instead of true people and because the audience knows that regardless what occurs in the film, the US DID lose the Battle of Bataan. First, as far as the characters go, I can easily forgive this. Since the film was made during the war, it was meant to encourage and rally the folks at home, so they made sure to put in some clichéd characters to illustrate certain themes (such as the sweet sailor, the jive-talking Chicano or the proud and hardworking Black soldier). These people weren't played badly, but they just seemed like characters pulled from a formula instead of being real folks. The same thing also occurred in such wartime films as SAHARA and DESTINATION TOKYO. However, despite this, the rest of the characters were very good captivating. As far as losing the battle goes, this can't be changed, but the Americans in the film are practically super-men because they kill off so many Japanese soldiers and make some incredibly lucky shots. Again, this is because the film was intended as positive propaganda, so I can look past this as well.

As for the rest of the movie, despite a very simple plot, the film did a very good job of keeping my attention and providing a lot of realism. In particular, I noticed late in the film that the surviving characters were just coated in blood splatters--something you'd almost never see in contemporary films.

Excellent acting didn't hurt as well--particularly by Robert Taylor who previously had been seen as more of a "pretty boy" than a rugged actor. Ironically, I saw this just after I saw Taylor in CAMILLE--where he played a pretty, simpering wuss!!! BATAAN was such a welcome change!
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bataanic gardens
AAdaSC28 April 2016
An army group are thrown together with the aim of preventing the Japanese from crossing a bridge in the Philippines during WW2. Sergeant Robert Taylor heads this small unit and we watch to see how many of his troop of 13 soldiers survive.

This is one of the better war films from this period. It reminded me of the film "Five Came Back" (1939) as you try and guess who will make it out of the jungle. As usual, there is a cast to get to know – possibly a couple of people too many to make things truly effective as we just can't get to know that many people. However, the body count starts early on, so you get involved from the beginning and the film keeps you watching. The set is good and there are many battle scenes as we approach a memorable ending ……….. and you can feel the tension.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
decent but fairly forgettable
disdressed127 February 2011
this WWII movie wasn't what i would call spectacular,but it was decent enough as war movies go.it's about as subtle a being hit over the head with a sledge hammer.this movie aims high on entertainment value,but low on realism.still,it's got its effective moments,and there's nary a dull moment.the acting is not the greatest as far as war movies go,but it is serviceable.unfortunately it didn't really linger with me,like some movies do.so in that sense,it's fairly forgettable.on the other hand,it wasn't a complete bomb either,as i sat thorough it no problem.i likely wouldn't watch it again anytime soon though.for me,Bataan is a 5/10
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed