The Last Time I Saw Paris (1954) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
77 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Last Time, the billing was reversed
bkoganbing23 May 2007
The Last Time I Saw Paris was the second of two films that Elizabeth Taylor and Van Johnson co-starred. What a difference in four years from The Big Hangover where Johnson was billed ahead of Taylor.

Which is odd in this case because the film is really about Johnson. It's based on F. Scott Fitzgerald's story, Babylon Revisited which takes place in Paris after World War I. MGM apparently thinking that the audience would be more amenable to a story taking place after World War II, so the plot was updated for France of the Fourth Republic.

It doesn't quite work though, France of that era was a whole lot different than France of the Roaring Twenties. They partied then also when Paris was liberated and the Germans chased out of their country, but on the whole it was a time for more sober reflection of what France's role in the post war world would be. The Roaring Twenties that Fitzgerald wrote about were not the Roaring Forties.

Van Johnson is a GI who comes upon a family of expatriates who lived in Paris right through the occupation. Walter Pidgeon and his two daughters, Donna Reed and Elizabeth Taylor. They both are interested, but Johnson has eyes only for Liz. And the film is their story.

It's a tragic story, you can see Fitzgerald himself in Van Johnson, the would be writer who becomes a dissolute playboy. Partying right along with him is Taylor who is the image of Fitzgerald's party girl wife Zelda.

MGM did this one on the cheap. There are some shots of Paris, but on the whole the Paris you see is the Paris that was created by the studio for their classic musical An American in Paris. View the films side by side and you'll have no doubt.

Look for Eva Gabor as a divorcée who likes Johnson and a very young Roger Moore as a tennis pro who'd like to be a kept man by Taylor.

It's a nice story, but it could have been a whole lot better if MGM had actually shot the film in Paris completely and really set in the period it was written.
55 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A heavy melodrama, well below its cast capabilities
SimonJack21 June 2020
"The Last Time I Saw Paris" was a hit in 1954-55, mostly because of the rising super star, Elizabeth Taylor. Taylor was the lead female, Helen Ellswirth, but her role and part in the story were second to the male lead, Charles Wills, played by Van Johnson. The fact that the 22-year-old Taylor was billed ahead of Johnson shows her star status and MGM's promo to cash in on the movie.

While it was a success at the box office - bringing in just under $5 million on a budget just under $2 million, the film finished 36th for the year. Considering its star content that included Walter Pidgeon, Donna Reed, Eva Gabor, and the rising Roger Moore, "The Last Time I Saw Paris" might have finished much better. There were many good movies in 1954, the year that "White Christmas" topped them all at the box office, and got just one Academy Award nomination. It was also the year of "Rear Window," "The Caine Mutiny," "The Glenn Miller Story," "On the Waterfront," "Magnificent Obsession," and a host of musicals, comedy romances, dramas, Westerns and war films that all fared better than this film.

Other reviewers have noted the characteristic of this film that sets it back. It's heavy melodrama, fodder for the daytime TV soap operas that were airing at the time. It's slow and drawn out. And, the fact that the main cast are almost all dysfunctional characters, puts a moribund pall over the film. It even starts off that way. So, the gaiety and excitement of the main period in the life of Charles Wills (Van Johnson) and Helen Ellswirth (Elizabeth Taylor) don't come off as fun at all. More pall descends on the film.

Walter Pidgeon's James Ellswirth interjects some light comedy in his hedonistic, irresponsible character. A young Roger Moore has the role of a tennis bum gigolo, Paul. And the capable Donna Reed is seen mostly as a sour, snippy woman with a huge secret that she can't hide from her husband, Claude Matine (George Dolenz), or the audience.

Van Johnson's role is strange, and one can't imagine why Helen would fall for him. Except for a little smiling and openness early, his character becomes moribund through most of the film. There are no exceptional or even very good portrayals in the film - perhaps Taylor's is the best as just okay.

I think this film had possibility, but the writers would need to put some life and spunk into Johnson's Wills. His self-pity wears very thin very fast; then his alcoholism and the very strange marital relationship of the two weighs down this film.

I strain to give the film five stars, so that's a credit as much to the decent but minor portrayal by Pidgeon. As the totally irresponsible head of the Ellswirth family, his witty philosophy at times provides the only spark for this film.

Here are the best lines of this movie, set in Paris just after the end of World War II.

James Ellswirth, "Your sister has made me very proud. We couldn't tell you the good news before, but Helen has been expelled from the university."

James Ellsworth, "Oh, now look, let her alone. After all, I was expelled from Harvard once, and why shouldn't a girl follow in her father's footsteps?"

Helen Ellswirth, "We're not rich either. We just live that way. Daddy says it the same thing, only it's much cheaper."

Helen Ellswirth, "Daddy says, it isn't what you have, it's what you owe."

James Ellswirth, "Helen getting married. Marion getting married. Father abandoned in middle age." Exhales, "Hmph. What man could ask for more?"

Charles Wills, "Is it Sunday already? What happened to Friday and Saturday?"

Charles Wills: "What'd I do?" Helen Ellswirth, "That, I'd be very interested to know."

Charles Wills: "Well, where are you going?" Helen, "To do something important - buy a new hat."
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
False and dated Fitzgerald but hard to resist nonetheless
bmacv28 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Advancing F. Scott Fitzgerald's Babylon Revisited from the jazz-age Paris of the 'Lost Generation' to the late 1940s and early 1950s looks logical enough, one World War being much like another, but a certain piquant period flavor gets lost. The madcap behaviors and post-Victorian motivations that made sense in the age of corset-free flappers and expatriate wastrels seem dated in the more efficient, streamlined age of jet travel. The way the characters ruminate about life back home in the United States, you'd think they'd colonized Mars rather than taken lodgings near the Eiffel Tower.

Amid the city-wide orgy of V-E Day, Army correspondent Van Johnson meets two sisters: Donna Reed, who gives him the eye, and Elizabeth Taylor, who catches his. Their happy-go-lucky father (Walter Pidgeon) isn't rich but lives like it ('It's cheaper that way,' Taylor explains). Taylor and Johnson marry, have a daughter, and party in an upper-crust social whirl, while he types out multiple drafts of The Great American Novel. How they (or Pidgeon) can afford their high life goes unmentioned, and when they suddenly come into money, thanks to some Texas oil wells that start gushing, there's little detectable change in the texture of their lives.

Except for disaffection. Johnson drinks more heavily as the rejection slips pile up (Pidgeon advises him that the secret to success is mediocrity). Taylor starts ditching the kid at bistros while she's off jumping into fountains. Three sheets to the wind, Johnson speeds off in his sports-car with Eva Gabor riding shotgun, but his reckless driving comes to naught (twice). Both partners play at adultery but never actually engage in it. Occasionally Reed, a frosty smile frozen on her face, pops up to register her smouldering resentment against Johnson. But then Taylor, of such delicate constitution that she has been known to contract 'flu not from microbes but from a gentle rain, gets soaked to the skin when she's locked out of the house at dawn and slogs her way through the slush...

Given these melodramatic excesses, Richard Brooks keeps the movie refreshingly low-key; he draws a subdued and affecting performance from Taylor (at the dizzying pinnacle of her young beauty). There are some missteps (Johnson having a drunken argument with himself; Roger Moore as a tennis-pro gigolo; a comfy wrap-up that comes off as forced and abrupt), but Brooks keeps the proceedings passably watchable. This heady, romanticized peek into the life of Americans abroad has its allure, and, though you don't believe it for a minute, it makes you want to sip a Pastis and light up a Gitane.
64 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elizabeth Taylor Stands Out in a Downbeat, Though Generally Well-Crafted, Drama
Snow Leopard17 January 2006
Though downbeat and sometimes sad, this is a generally well-crafted human drama that explores several aspects of family life and relationships. Elizabeth Taylor is the standout in a good cast, with Van Johnson also getting some good scenes. The postwar Paris setting is used in a number of well-conceived ways in the story.

Johnson plays the main character, a reporter and would-be novelist who begins the movie with a trip back to Paris, and begins reminiscing about the past. The character's career disappointments and family crises give much of the story a markedly pessimistic (if not depressing) tone, yet Johnson plays the part believably, and the story brings out some worthwhile thoughts, as his character gradually loses his perspective on things.

As his wife, Taylor's appeal and energy stand out every time she is on screen, but more importantly, she develops the character consistently throughout the story, often in interesting contrast to Johnson's character. She starts out as a rather spoiled, fun-loving young woman, then gradually takes on more depth and character. Her performance adds considerable meaning to the rest of the movie, and it also help in making the other characters more believable.

Walter_Pidgeon (sorry, otherwise can't get it past the spell-checker) seems to be having fun as the easygoing father, and Donna Reed does a solid job in a rather thankless role as Taylor's more serious, sometimes envious sister. Eva Gabor and a young Roger Moore play characters who are one-dimensional yet important to the plot.

Overall, everything works pretty well. The pace is just a bit slow at times, which occasionally makes for heavy going during the sadder stretches. But these always have a point, and as a whole it is a worthwhile drama with some interesting characters.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lovely Elizabeth in empty soaper
jjnxn-111 October 2013
Lush not terribly faithful rendition of Fitzgerald's Babylon Revisited is hampered by the miscasting of Van Johnson in the lead. There is no way other than script demands that Elizabeth Taylor would pick the vapid Johnson let alone stay with him throughout the increasingly boorish behavior he subjects her too. Donna Reed fulfills the requirements of her part but it asks little of her skill. The film is beautifully shot with that MGM sheen and Walter Pidgeon gives a terrific performance as Elizabeth's madcap father. Fitzgerald is hard to adapt to begin with and the script writers don't have a firm grasp on the material so it becomes a colorful soap opera but little else.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
There is a reason it was a short story...
poj-man25 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The story is not so in depth to allow it to come to life as a novel or a feature length movie.

It is interesting to read the reviews after seeing the movie. No 2 reviews are alike. This speaks volumes as to how the film actually affects those who see it. The viewers take away vastly different aspects of the film to discuss.

The opinion this reviewer has is that the film is not as drudgingly long as some reviewers have noted. Also, while Van Johnson is always a bit wooden in his roles, he is not as awful as he is made out to be in some other reviews. The film boasts a fine cast and had some money behind it and there are some nice aspects to the story. This reviewer did not particularly mind watching the film.

The problem is that the story is not fully fleshed to be a full length movie. There is no central point to the story to carry it to the length of a feature film. There is little purpose or philosophy that comes through as an overriding thematic. Van and Elizabeth play self destructive characters who suffer tragedy via doing some dumb things but...so what? Who really cares about dumb people doing dumb things? The emotional draw of the story never comes out. The emotion is stifled by the story; not by Van Johnson's acting. But...that is why this remained a short story that delved into the mind of the character pining for his lost daughter. There's just no emotional payoff with the characters that warrants nearly 2 hours of screen time.

Still, compared to most of what passes for drama these days the film is far superior to what is released today. That's a sad commentary on film making and story writing today.

One other note: For a story that is set in Paris there is little sense that any of the action occurs in Paris. This ties into the script. Rather than using known aspects of Paris to enhance the flavor of the story there is little to utilize the location. The title of the film could be The Last Time I Saw New York City and nothing would materially change in the film.

If you are interested in film and story telling and the history of cinema I recommend giving the movie a viewing to familiarize yourself with it. Some parts work well (Elizabeth Taylor as the woman in the fountain immortalized in a full wall mural in a bar) but some parts...notably the father\daughter\aunt relationship at the end...just comes off flat. The film is a mix of good and not so good and the mix of good and not so good reviews is a good reflection of the movie.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The movie betrayed the dry-eyed spirit of the original material
Nazi_Fighter_David6 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"The Last Time I Saw Paris" converted the author's sensibility downward, to compassion and soap opera… The movie therefore betrayed the dry-eyed spirit of the original material… The first mistake, though, was in changing the era from the Lost Generation Twenties to post-World War II… The jazz age ambiance, recollected in the story, the mystique of Paris in the Twenties—these key tokens of Fitzgerald's sensibility were missing…

Even more damaging than the switch in era is the attempt to expand the characters whose motivations are only sketched lightly in the short story… Told in flashback, the story centers on a successful American novelist (Van Johnson) who returns to Paris and a reunion with the child he left in the custody of his sister-in-law (Donna Reed), since the death of his wife...

The movie and the actors do not move the characters from point A to point B: why, for instance, do husband and wife reverse roles, she transformed from party girl to sober wife who wants to go home to America, he collapsing from serious writer to disappointed drunk…

Van Johnson lacks the mythic stature to suggest other than a poor man's version of the great, doomed Fitzgerald… And Liz was too young and inexperienced at the time to embody an arch-neurotic, part a malicious temptress, and part an aiding angel…

The role is a cumulation of the Taylor ingénue: the goodtime flirt, cunningly stealing a man from her older sister; the spoiled daughter of a fast living phony; the irresponsible party girl with a good heart underneath it all; the sober young mother and wife; the defiant adulteress; the frail spirit cut down by the forces of nature…

At each "station," she is on home ground, but the part comes out in bits and pieces rather than a coherent whole: the character, finally, does not add up… It may be partly Taylor vapidity (Beverly Hills didn't prepare her for Paris), but it's also the script and the direction: that saintly woman, forgiving all, has very little connection to the blithe spirit who steals her sister's man and parties with non-stop frenzy
32 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Romantic drama about the troubled relationship between a war journalist and a feisty young girl
ma-cortes6 July 2010
A successful writer ( Van Johnson) remembers about his love story with a gorgeous American girl ( Elizabeth Taylor ) in post WWII Paris . As we watch bright scenarios from Paris as the Arc of Triumph , river Sena , Cathedral of Notre Dame , promenade of Eliseos ; furthermore a horsemen race and Montecarlo car race , among others . Based on a semi-autobiographic novel titled ¨ Babylon revisited ¨ by F. Scott Fitzgerald who is well incarnated by Van Johnson and in which Helen played by Elizabeth Taylor represents Zelda , Scott's wife .

This interesting movie reminisces the love affair between a wealthy war reporter and a feisty young woman ; it packs romance , drama , and colorful scenarios . Good support cast as Donna Reed , Eva Gabor , Kurt Kasznar , John Ducette and Walter Pidgeon who steals the show as joyful and sponger father . Glamorous cinematography in glimmer Technicolor by Joseph Ruttemberg and adequate musical score .

The motion picture is professionally written and directed by Richard Brooks . He's an American filmmaker and screenwriter who won an Oscar for ¨ Elmer Gantry ¨ writings ; Brooks so consistently blended the good with average which it became quite impossible to know what to expect from him next . In the 50s , the harder his movies impacted , the more successful they were ; and the gentler they were , the less effective as ¨The last time saw Paris ¨ . Thus , the Brooks pictures that have the biggest hit in the 50 are the following : ¨Blackboard jungle ¨, ¨Something of value ¨ ¨The Brothers Karamazov ¨ , and in the 60s are ¨ Sweet bird of youth¨, Cat on a hot tin roof ¨, ¨In cold blood ¨ and ¨ The professionals ¨ ; in addition during the 70s a special mention to ¨ Bite the bullet ¨. Rating : : Good film that appeal to Elizabeth Taylor fans .
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Well made, but it does seem to lose its way towards the end...
planktonrules17 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is a rather annoying film. After all, the first 80% of it is very good--with nice acting and a very compelling story. Then, oddly, the last portion of the movie seems to fall apart and is a bit of a confusing and saccharine-like mess.

The film begins with Van Johnson meeting and falling in love with Elizabeth Taylor. Considering how incredibly beautiful and sweet she was, it was easy to see why he dumped Donna Reed to pursue Taylor. Johnson's ambition it to publish a novel, but in the meantime he has married Taylor, has a lovely little girl and a well-paying job in Paris. What more could he want? Sure, his book has been rejected by some publishers, but considering everything he is still clearly a lucky man. But Johnson is NOT happy and is a self=indulgent idiot (to put it mildly). All he can do is feel sorry for himself for not being published. To bruise his shallow ego, he begins taking Taylor for granted and spends way too much time with his new friend--sultry Eva Gabor. Gabor is NOT the 'just friends' type, as she's been married multiple times. How any sane man could chose her over the sweet wife is beyond me and you really, really hate Johnson's character--a big switch for the guy who usually played such likable guys.

All of this drama was compelling and I really got into the film--and wondered why the film had a mediocre score on IMDb. But then, late in the film, I saw exactly what the problem was. The film began to make no sense at all and decided to use clichés instead of decent writing. Out of the blue, Johnson locks Taylor out of the house and it's raining. In the real world, she'd get mad but that's all. Here in this Bizarro World, instead she gets sick and dies!!!! Folks, in real life standing in the rain does NOT cause death! And how she died with him rushing to her and having her die in his arms was dreadfully schmaltzy and stupid. And, what happened next was worse. Not one minute of the last portion of the film rang true or made sense. Considering that Johnson was cheating on his wife and locked the wife out in the rain, you'd THINK Taylor's father (Walter Pidgeon) would be at least a tiny bit angry--but he wasn't!! And, when Johnson CONTINUES to feel sorry for himself and neglects his daughter (necessitating her being cared for by others), you think this guy is a total bum--and yet they have them reunite at the end of the film and there's a 100% phony Hollywood ending!!! The first portion of the film I give a 9--it's that good. The last, I'd give a 2 or a 3--at best. An overall score of 5 seems reasonable as the actors do a nice job with a bubble-headed script--but frankly, the end just ruins the film for me.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The only thing tragic about this tragedy is Van Johnson's acting
stills-616 September 2001
What a terrible case of bad casting. Van Johnson has the emotional range of Herbie the Love Bug. There is no chemistry between him and Taylor, who is as gorgeous as ever and makes you wonder why SHE could fall so hard for HIM. Why in the HELL is HE in this movie!!

The rest of the cast is near perfect by comparison. The story... er, well... it's terribly contrived and predictable. Aside from Johnson making his character a big baby, I could follow most of it with my disbelief suspended. This role calls for someone who 1) is loveable, 2) is a rake, 3) is a believeable drunk, 4) is physically at least half as attractive as Taylor, and lastly, 5) can act worth a damn. Needless to say, the person they chose fits none of these characteristics. William Holden would have been perfect in this role. I'd like to hear the back story of how Johnson got the part, because he must have been blackmailing someone.
28 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
pretty dull
funkyfry2 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I went into this one not expecting much, and I wasn't disappointed. Basically you have a pleasingly low-key performance by Van Johnson as a hard-working American G.I. who decides to stay in Paris, under the spell of a lovely bohemian (Liz Taylor) and her anti-pragmatic father (Walter Pidgeon), but his performance eventually veers too deeply into the maudlin as we're expected to believe that his inability to write a successful novel has brought about an existential crisis for the protagonist as well as a marriage crisis for the couple.

The most irritating thing about the movie is the way that the writers tried so hard to make sure that the audience wouldn't blame either of the lovers for any of the bad things that are happening, all the while expecting us to buy that each lover blames the other at least at one point or another. That makes me suspect more than anything that some radical changes must have been made to F. Scott Fitzgerald's original story.

It's even hard to say if the film has any visual beauty to compensate for the lack of believable characters, at least on the DVD I saw (where it was coupled with "Father's Little Dividend") the colors were very faded and there were visible scratch lines and so forth indicating that this DVD was made from a print and not a negative. So I couldn't possibly take away or add any credit to the film because of photography because it's very hard to judge the quality of the images. However I found the directing in general to be good with regards to the actors' performances but pretty nondescript in terms of visual sensibilities.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Actress Comes of Age
MGMboy31 July 2003
Here in The Last Time I Saw Paris an interesting thing happens. Elizabeth Taylor becomes a woman. Before this picture there were really only two other outstanding performances by Miss Taylor. Or I should say where she was allowed to rise above the material. The first being of course the rhapsodic National Velvet and the second the astonishing A Place In The Sun. The films in between those and The Last Time I Saw Paris were mostly along the `Isn't she beautiful?' line of movie making, and, why not? That was the main engine of most Hollywood star vehicles of the day. A Star didn't have to be a talent. But it was essential to possess a presence that reached out from the screen and touched the audience in a primal way. Miss Taylor had that in spades but she had much more that was often eclipsed in the dazzling explosion of her extraordinary almost alien beauty. But here in the hands of director Richard Brooks (who would later lead her to her triumph in Cat On A Hot Tin Roof) Miss Taylor finds a new level in her abilities as an actress. Her Helen is a woman of many layers and dark corners, of mercurial flights and deep sadness. Elizabeth at the tender age of 22 grasps all the aspects of this tragic woman and illuminates not only the screen with them but the whole enterprise as well. She shows us where she, as an actress is going in the future. And who she will become in her later films, one of the best screen actresses of the twentieth century. This is the real beginning of the Elizabeth Taylor of legend. She fills the role as no one of her generation could. Never again after this film would she sleepwalk through a film, a beautiful shadow to dream over. She is aided in what is perhaps one of Van Johnson's best performances. Donna Reed scores high in the role of Helen's bitter sister and Walter Pidgon is a delight as her roguish father. A standout cameo is presented by Eva Gabor, (not Zsa Zsa) the only one of the famous sisters who had any real talent. The only false performance in the film comes from child actress Sandy Descher. When you compare her forced and overly cute performance to that of the child Elizabeth Taylor in `Jane Eyre' then you see what a treasure Miss Taylor has always been. There is something so essentially wonderful in this gem from MGM and it is this. The Last Time I Saw Pairs is the perfect example of the last flowering in the 50's of the `woman's picture'. Films where women could be multi faceted and complex and drive the story on under their own steam as whole human beings. This is a window to the 50's and a style of filmmaking that seems gone forever, great stories of strong women who fill the screen with power and grace. But with `Far From Heaven' and `The Hours' I may be wrong about forever. I recommend this admittedly dated but charming film for anyone who wants to see what screen acting is all about. It is about thinking and Miss Taylor is a master at the craft.
57 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beautifully filmed, but mawkish...
moonspinner5528 December 2014
F. Scott Fitzgerald's short story "Babylon Revisted", reworked by three screenwriters (including director Richard Brooks), becomes a well-dressed but chilly, mopey star-vehicle. Americans in Paris find themselves wealthy after striking oil, but the writer-husband's inability to sell a story--coupled with a drinking problem and an attraction to a catty socialite--puts a strain on their marriage. Elizabeth Taylor does what she can with the masochistic wifey role, even getting what actresses like to call "a good hospital scene," but Van Johnson has more of an opportunity as a performer to show range and emotion (the writing is slanted that way). The scenario becomes episodic after the couple comes into money, while the final portion of the plot continues 15 minutes longer than necessary, presumably to 'teach' angry relative Donna Reed about forgiveness...and to show Johnson begging for love, something that apparently humbles every tortured writer's soul. **1/2 from ****
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Suffers from its lenght
martin_humble30 August 2001
It is the end of WWII. Van Johnson, a reporter in the military, celebrates together with all of Paris. At a café he meets a friend and his girlfriend. The girl, played by Donna Reed, immediatly fells in love with Van Johnsson. Unfortenatly for Donna Reed, Van Johnsson is bound to meet her sister, a young beautiful girl played by Elisabeth Taylor. There is love at first sight, They get married and their marriage has its ups and downs but results in a baby girl. In the most troubled period in their marriage, Van Johnsson no longer works as a reporter but as a novelist. All he gets is rejections and this affect both of them to that he moves back to the states. After a year he understands where he went wrong and goes back to France for his daughter.

The movie features good actors, especially Walter Pidgeon as the father of the two sisters. We also get to see a young Roger Moore in his first American movie. sadly the movie suffers from its lenght, almost two hours. At times it seems dull and uninteresting. 4/10
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A very solid film worth seeing.
dancooper9917 October 2002
The Last Time I saw Paris

Reviewed by Dan Cooper

This film was made in 1954, and by virtue of its age it becomes an easy target for those who would use it as a vehicle to pump up their own egos with a verbal bashing that will likely go unchallenged. The film has indeed been bashed, here on this database among other places, as unimportant and unworthy of your time as a possible rental choice.

I disagree completely with the uncalled for bashing, and with the judgement that the movie is unworthy of your time. See it for yourself. And if you are young enough to be completely unfamiliar with all of the actors, so much the better for you to judge it fairly on its merits rather than be snowed by the reputations of Hollywood personalities.

The plot has depth and very few weaknesses, the acting is good to very good, and the story has interest value in both historical and social frames of reference.

The plot concerns the uniting of two people whose tragic flaws are not well matched, with the obligatory tragic results. The pair gets together spinning out of a near-miss love triangle. The man (Van Johnson) has no idea of the existence of the triangle, as he is completely taken with Taylor and just as completely forgets his earlier attraction to the other woman (Donna Reed). Reed, the rejected third wheel, is actually not rejected, per se, but becomes the "odd man out" none the less when her sister (Liz Taylor) successfully steers the affections of the duped Johnson in her own direction instead.

Reed adopts the persona of the rejected party to a relationship that never was, and exacts her revenge later in the film.

While the big name actors of the day are no longer influencing moviegoers today, they undoubtedly sold the film in 1954. I find some weaknesses in both acting and directing, but the film is definitely worth seeing if you have never had the pleasure. Van Johnson's role is that of a fairly shallow character with a good heart but no follow-through to carry him to victory until way too late to do much good. Johnson possibly could have done more with the role, but the weakness of the character should not be confused with some partially perceived weakness in Johnson's delivery of the part.

Taylor does a nice job as the sly and experienced older sister, the one with the better looks and the Machiavellian technique to get whatever she wants, again at the expense of little sister Reed. The film is actually carried more by the acting of the supporting cast than by the efforts of the leads. Two very strong performances are put forth by Walter Pidgeon and George Dolenz. Pidgeon plays the opportunistic pretender to wealth and father of the two women. Dolenz is the earnest lover of Reed, who inherits her full-time attentions only after Johnson is fully occupied with Taylor. Dolenz marries Reed and in the end does a very nice job of becoming the film's heroic figure.

Eva Gabor at the peak of her youthful beauty does a good job as yet another love triangle component for the easily side-tracked Johnson after his marriage to Taylor. Another triangle develops with a very young Roger Moore finding the eye of Taylor.

Do yourself a favor and see this movie.

Dan Cooper is a freelance writer/editor. He has been writing for over 30 years and has done book and movie reviews sporadically since the 1970's.
46 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Van Johnson is too likeable to play his part
AlsExGal16 July 2021
At the end of the war years his character, Charles, is a writer for the Stars and Stripes, and wants to continue a career in journalism. He meets James Ellswirth (Walter Pidgeon), an aging member of the lost generation, and his two grown daughters. There is level headed Marion (Donna Reed) and frisky flirtatious Helen (Elizabeth Taylor).

Charles and Marion are first an item, but then Helen steals him away from her own sister. Marion settles down with somebody else. That is to say, she settles for someone else. Houses tend to settle, and it's usually no fun to watch. But I digress.

Then the barren worthless oil fields that James gave Charles and Helen as a wedding present come in big time and suddenly Charles and Helen are fabulously wealthy and they transform into a second lost generation in the tradition of dear old dad, except this time with the money to make a really big mess of their lives. Charles quits his job and just becomes a huge drunken womanizing jerk, feeling sorry for himself because all of his rejection from publishers. This is where we get to the hard to believe part. I just don't buy Van Johnson as this tortured yet shallow soul. Louis B. Mayer, when he was redecorating MGM after Irving Thalberg's death, specifically hired Johnson because of his easy, song and dance man's likability and uncomplicated face. The part cries out for Kirk Douglas or maybe even better - Montgomery Clift.

A huge tragedy ensues, and Marion, taking time off from settling, comes back into the picture to make things even worse. Who do I really feel sorry for in this film full of unlikeable characters? Marion's husband, who at the end, finally figures out he's been settled for all of these years. You can see it in his face. And if that face looks familiar, it's because the actor is the father of Monkee Mickey Dolenz.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Overdone drama.
Boba_Fett113830 March 2007
This is your typical average overdone MGM drama, with a sappy story and a fluffy look and feel all over it. Nevertheless, everything in it is done well enough to make this a good (enough) genre movie to watch.

The movie is needlessly told as a flashback, which also makes us the viewers already aware of how the main story ends, in advance. Sometimes in cases this approach works well for a story but not for such a mediocre movie as this one I'm afraid.

In the midst of all the formulaic drama there are some fine actors in the movie, that get to shine. Elizabeth Taylor is really great and to me she was the one that truly carried the movie, though in screen time it is perhaps Van Johnson who plays the real main role of the movie. The movie also has a supporting cast to die for; Walter Pidgeon, Donna Reed, Eva Gabor and even a young Roger Moore in his first real notable movie role. I just wish that some of the character development would had been better though. Also the 'relationship' between Charles Wills and Marion Ellswirth never gets developed well enough, though it plays an essential part in all of the drama in the movie, especially in the beginning and toward the ending of the movie.

The movie is really typical for MGM '50's standards, meaning that the drama is heavy but the approach of it isn't always. The movie at times tends to be more cheerful than dramatic, which isn't always for the movie its own benefits. Toward the end the drama thickens, which especially gives the movie its 'overdone' feeling, which also doesn't exactly make the movie more believable to watch. It's still a good enough drama to watch, just not one that will grab you.

The movie uses some fine settings. Of course Paris is the perfect backdrop for a romantic movie and they used some nice locations in the movie (not the Eiffel tower for a change, even though it's still featured on the movie its cover). Also the costumes are quite nice.

Good enough for its genre and MGM '50's standards but that doesn't exactly mean that it's a highly recommendable one though.

6/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Paris as you've never seen her before;
Cinema_Fan15 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Writer of The Last Time I saw Paris, F. Scott Fitzgerald (1896 - 1940) and director Richard Brooks (1912 - 1992) brings us this star-studded cast unto the streets and hearts of the city of amor. With bright young things such as a very beautiful Elizabeth Taylor (aged 22 years) and Van Johnson taking the lead roles as the poor but vitality filled youths who must, and in the case for poor Charles Wills retrace his paths and once again revisit this Babylon city.

Filled with the likes of Walter Pidgeon, Donna Reed, Roger Moore and a young Eva Gabor (sister to Zsa Zsa), and too, the tiny tot Sandy "THEM!" Descher, this fairytale of love, relationships, resentment, jealously and rude awakenings is a glam fest of lost love, missed opportunities and bitter rivalries; these are, at times, shallow people who have to deal with deeper consequences that climaxes into a most touching ending indeed. Each has their own skeletons hiding, and what makes this movie work is the way in which the bitterness shows no remorse for its self-inflicted victims, and too, the excellent acting from all, bare with it till the end, and you will see alcoholic Van Johnson begging for his young daughters return both captivating and his breathtakingly agonising plight only builds up the finale to a higher level. Wonderful stuff.

Great performance's from all; tight, constant and believable, and given a script and dialogue that can be both acid tongued and emotional from the very start, we also see, very quickly, that this movie belongs to Elizabeth Taylor. As movie legend denotes MGM bought into this project from Paramount to propel this evergreen beauty further into the glamour and beauty that is the Elizabeth Taylor myth, no expense spared; the best gowns, chic hairstyles and the look of the Goddess Aphrodite, oh, and her acting is also superb, playing the lovelorn woman with graceful respect of her role and showing depth and maturity to boot. Ms. Taylor's script, Ms. Taylor's role, is empty of the panache of the Hollywood style of being over-produced, but it is a lovingly small and tender rendition of how one can turn less into more. Tremendous stuff.

Working on human emotion rather than gimmicky egos, The Last Time I Saw Paris is a charming novella that will take you far beyond the walls of Babylon and have you reminiscing the beautiful nights in the City of Love. Have you your one-way ticket bought yet?
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sentimental Melodrama! Van Johnson shines in his role!
Sylviastel22 December 2010
Van Johnson was fantastic in his role as a World War II veteran who returns to Paris, France where he seeks to be a writer in the post-World War era. He meets and falls in love with Helen (played by Dame Elizabeth Taylor). Donna Reed has a supporting role as Marion, Helen's sister. This film was shot in the early days of using color instead of black and white. The Parisian shots could have been better. The storyline is quite typical. Helen and Jimmy fall in love and get married and have a child, a beautiful daughter, Victoria. They remain in Paris, France where the living is good and the partying is non-stop. Well, Jimmy's writing career consists of constant rejection. Helen's unhappy as well in their marriage. The story is a bit outdated and melodramatic to involve acting but it's Van Johnson's film and not his co-star Elizabeth Taylor. Eva Gabor has a supporting role in it as does Walter Pidgeon playing Helen's father. It's decent, old film to watch at least once.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
All the complexity of Fitzgerald's story has been wrung out.
maryheather17 November 2004
This "adaptation" of one of F. Scott Fitzgerald's greatest short stories is a conglomeration of every bad melodramatic plot twist known to the movies. You have to keep watching just to see what they'll throw in next. Van Johnson is perhaps even more wooden than usual and Donna Reed has little to do in a thankless role. Walter Pigeon does as well as could be expected, considering his one-note bluff and hearty character. But Elizabeth Taylor manages to seem genuine and natural most of the time, despite being saddled with a perplexing character whose ever-changing motivations seem to come out of nowhere. Especially during her serious scenes with Johnson in the first half of the movie, she manages to hint at a believable inner complexity.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The last time I saw romance, the leading man had it. Sorry. Can't say this about this one.
mark.waltz31 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This film was going to be a smash hit regardless of who was cast in the leading role. Unfortunately, Van Johnson, one of the most popular actors of the 50s, was completely miscast in this, certainly no Gregory Peck or Burt Lancaster or Kirk Douglas or countless other actors who would have been perfect in the role he plays. It is far too complex for his light talents, terrific for musicals (even though he wasn't the best singer) or light comedy or even the occasional drama where he played a dark character. That would be later on, but unfortunately, he doesn't have it to be a success in this. That being said, he's fine in the beginning until he ends up married to la Liz, already having jilted her sister, Donna Reed. They are the daughters of bon vivante Walter Pidgeon, a neer do well drifter who has somehow has managed to give them a beautiful life. Both women are perfectly vulnerable to Johnson's charms, as hard to believe as it is from the audience perspective, and as gorgeous as they are, they are far from vixens. Perfect ladies, a nice contrast from what Liz had played in "A Place in the Sun" and what Reed had played in "From Here to Eternity".

At the height of their popularity in the mid 1950's, they were ideally cast in this post World War II drama loosely based on an F. Scott Fitzgerald story, and Johnson (playing a variation of Fitzgerald) is somewhat embarrassing when he has to play the dark elements of the character who seems to be on the verge of a breakdown as his marriage to Taylor goes on even though she's devoted to him. A flirtation with Eva Gabor gives hints of infidelity, so when Roger Moore (playing a well-known tennis bum) comes along, Liz is vulnerable to his attentions as Johnson continues to neglect her period She has various ailments, and that always seems to bring Johnson back, but why she doesn't dump this bum makes no sense. He's certainly not good for either sister. They give the impression that Johnson reminds them of their father, but Pidgeon has all the elements his character requires while Johnson does not.

Beautifully photographed in Technicolor, this has gorgeous gowns and scenery, and of course that haunting Jerome Kern song in the background as well as a bit of "Laura", "Friendly Star" from "Summer Stock" and a few other familiar tunes heard as well. Richard Brooks, who would later direct Taylor in "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof", does a good job in spite of the miscast leading man in keeping the audience attention, and manages to get a believable and non-cloying performance from young Sandy Descher as Johnson and Liz's daughter. The film tends to drag as it moves past a tragic twist more than halfway through, going into places that extend the film about 20 minutes too long. It's obvious they were going for an artistic theme with this one, beautiful in so many ways but one of the biggest disappointments in MGM's filmography even though basically it is still a good film. This truly could have been one of their most memorable films of the '50s, but over ambition is what ultimately prevents that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
First Time I Saw "Last Time I Saw Paris"
happipuppi137 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Seeing this on the shelf of my local library,I decided to give this movie a chance and hope for the best. The title first of all told me that this would be a "tear-jerker",the kind of movie I'm not really into but I checked it out just the same.

No doubt after it started I could certainly see why men in Hollywood wanted to be with Liz. I asked myself while watching though,why would a free spirit like her want to tie herself down with an overly-serious person like Van Johnson's character?

I'm not saying he doesn't show emotion but sharing a kiss on the street hardly seems a plausible way for two to fall in love with each other. (Then again,in life,strange things do happen.)

I did get caught up in their romantic and idealistic ways but of course was waiting for the disaster to strike.

Then they hit : His inability to sell a novel to a publisher. Her still carrying on as if she weren't married. His friendship with Eva Gabor making her (Taylor) jealous for no good reason. His alcoholism and (what we're clued into in the first scene of the movie) her untimely demise from pneumonia. Quite the soap opera.

I found Taylor's character dying from this to be a bit ridiculous. Okay,she got locked out and caught in the rain and the cold with snow on the ground. She gets to her sister's place soaking wet and passes out. Now,why not just get her upstairs and into a hot bath for Pete's sake?!

Any believability the film had before that went out the window for me and after her character is gone,the only thing one is left with is Johnson's character getting his daughter back from Donna Reed. I couldn't stand her character at all for she seems to hate Van Johnson's character without good reason,though she has one later.

I will admit when it comes to scenes of parents and kids,I do get sentimental & a little emotional but then seeing Johnson & daughter reunited is a wonderful touching end to the film.

One laughable scene in the movie is when Johnson & Gabor are in the Monte Carlo car race and they skid in the rain into a wooden fence. The skidding is clearly a stock-recorded sound effect,that sounds like it's from a Warner Brothers cartoon!

I rate five stars for the above listed reasons,the acting is good here but some aspects are just too unbelievable to accept. (Beware of $1 DVD copies of this movie,their quality is poor.) (END)
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great romantic classic
thguru15 September 2001
A great romantic classic. I saw it again now in 9/2001. Some would say that it is a little slow. I still loved it. Liz Taylor looks as beautiful as ever. But the real star is Van Johnson. Great acting. The emotion that he shows is outstanding and very real. I am an older man now...57 years old. I had to reach for my hanky several times. The love...the joy...the tears... and the sorrow of a man for his wife and his child. Well...well...it is too bad they don't have movies like this anymore. I miss them. This is one I will save and enjoy seeing again someday....
48 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching for it's moving climax
davidallen-8412219 July 2017
Reviewers either greatly admire or totally dismiss Van Johnson's presence and acting ability,never more so than in this movie.In one of his last interviews,he selected this as one of the works he was most proud of and I can understand why.As the story unwinds,over an eight year period,Van's performance takes us on a journey from a keen,love-smitten man through to a repentant,lonely one.His penultimate scene with Donna Reed really hits home,as we measure his helpless pleas against her stubborn bitterness.I'm genuinely moved each time I watch it,just as I am with the following moment when her husband (very nicely played by George Dolenz) awakens her to the sad truth.I don't want to give away any more than that.Donna Reed is very impressive in a role that's not easy to warm to. Elizabeth Taylor is at the height of her beauty and her performance is quite pleasing.As already mentioned,the only available DVD's of "The Last Time I Saw Paris" are of the poorest quality.With a re-mastered edition,I believe this entertaining movie could attract a whole new following.It's such a romantic title and that can't be denied.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Play It Again, Van
wes-connors14 February 2010
It's an update of F. Scott Fitzgerald's "Babylon Revisited" for writer Van Johnson (as Charles Wills), recalling his whirlwind post-World War II encounter with beautiful and curvaceous sisters Elizabeth Taylor and Donna Reed (as Helen and Marion Ellswirth), in Paris. When beautiful Ms. Taylor secures Mr. Johnson's hand in marriage, beautiful Ms. Reed weds George Dolenz (as Claude Matine). This is one of Mr. Dolenz' higher profile roles; he was the father of "The Monkees" drummer Micky Dolenz.

Veteran Walter Pidgeon (as James Ellswirth) gives some worthless Texas oil wells to Johnson, as a wedding gift; then, when the oil unexpectedly starts to flow, life changes for everyone. Multi-married Hungarian beauty Eva Gabor (later of "Green Acres") distracts Johnson from Taylor, and handsome young Roger Moore (later "James Bond") distracts Taylor from Johnson. Everyone is easily distracted. Alcohol dully plays a role in the story, especially, but unconvincingly, affecting star Johnson.

**** The Last Time I Saw Paris (11/18/54) Richard Brooks ~ Van Johnson, Elizabeth Taylor, Donna Reed, Walter Pidgeon
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed