An Englishman's Castle (TV Mini Series 1978) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A haunting memory for 30 years
GeorgeSickler4 December 2008
I can't add to the excellent comments made previously. On a whim, I checked this title on IMDb tonight and was surprised to find it listed.

I also watched An Englishman's Castle, on PBS/Harrisburg, while living in New Holland, PA in the late 1970s. I became increasingly involved and moved by the first two episodes. When the night arrived for episode 3, the station announced "An Englishman's Castle will not be shown tonight." It was never re-scheduled. I have never seen the series listed anywhere since. For decades, I have been wondering if this were intentional; there never was a third and final episode, and this was a part of the main plot. I see today there was a third installment. But I'm still wondering why this outstanding BBC production hasn't been re-broadcast (to my knowledge), and I can't even find it on Amazon.com
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Germans took the castle 38 years ago. Will an English TV producer help take it back?
DanaNetherton28 August 2004
As this three-episode story begins, English TV producer Peter Ingram (Kenneth More) is preparing the next group of stories in his long-running series, "An Englishman's Castle." A nostalgic wartime series, it tells the story of a British family living through the "Phony War" and the "Lightning War" (blitzkrieg) of the first year of World War II, with the fall of Poland, the fall of France ... and the fall of Britain ... to Nazi Germany... 38 years ago.

The series is a popular part of British television. The German Gestapo's watchdogs do not mind it: they approve of patriotic sentiment, so long as it does not turn anti-German. And Ingram has played this game for a very long time, all of his adult life. He is prepared to continue playing it. Until the day comes when the British Resistance approaches him for help...

I liked the basic story itself, but I especially liked the depiction of the "show within a show". The series's musical signature was a stately orchestral "Lilibulero", giving it the same "sound" as the long-running series "Upstairs, Downstairs" -- which also depicted life during a time of turbulent change in Britain. ("Lilibulero" also happens to be the musical signature of the real-world World Service radio program that is broadcast by the BBC, the British production company that aired this television show.) It was interesting to see how an "Upstairs, Downstairs"-like show might have looked if Britain had not continued to win European wars in the 20th century.

One especially striking moment took place during the first rehearsal of an upcoming episode of the series. Ingram was basing the series on his own life during those years ... and in his own life his older brother was in the British military and was killed. The TV character corresponding to his brother was very popular with the British audience, and the actor playing him expected to have a cozy, secure job for quite a few more seasons. When Ingram passed out the next week's script and the cast seated around the large table read through them, everyone was stunned when they learned that in this episode that very popular character was killed. Truly killed ... not the "he's missing and presumed dead" "killed" that soap operas sometimes use to bring a character back on a whim. Killed-dead.

The entire cast protested. The actor protested, of course, but the others protested out of sympathy for him. This was more than simply a role, they argued, it was his livelihood, his income. How could you, in effect, sack him, when he had done nothing wrong ... when he had done nothing to deserve this cruel treatment? But Ingram's brother had done nothing to deserve being killed, either. Yet he died ... and so, Ingram explained, the time had come for this character to die.

We see many stories set "backstage". We don't often see this aspect of "backstage life" for working actors. Although I believe it had no significant effect on the overall story (the Gestapo and the British Resistance), it was a television moment that has stayed with me for more than 20 years (I write this in 2004). I remember this show fondly.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the finest productions ever on TV
mrosey2329 January 2008
Of course you can tell that I like An Englishman's Castle. Although it was 30 years ago when I saw it for the first and last time, I remember clearly how the story evolved into a story not about 1940 nor even about 1978 in England but more it became a study of how people are ruled, and how they rebel, and how they live and how they love. Intertwined with all of this is a study of how censorship is really conducted in the modern world of media. Since it was aired on PBS (WNET) in New York it achieved an almost eerie obscurity which I've always felt had to do with how on-the-money were its views of censorship. Its obscurity is a testimony to the truth that was written into every aspect of this wonderful production.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic British TV Drama
mike_collins-118 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Just discussing this in the pub tonight, amazed to find all the comments here, all with very clear 30 year old memories of this fabulous show. For me, it was the first time I came to understand subtext. In one scene an actor in a script conference argues eloquently and with passion for his character to survive a significant and potentially fatal plot twist. It becomes clear that if he loses his role on the show he and his family will fall into destitution... his arguments for his character's life are actually for his own. A powerful thing to grasp when you're 16, and a skillful piece of writing.

By the end, Peter Ingram is faced with a dilemma: does he have the conviction and bravery of his fictional imaginings? He can write a hero, can he be one? The moral ambiguity of the then current IRA letter-bombing campaign is addressed in a way not be seen again until Battlestar Galactica used it's 'SF' cloak to address the suicide bombers in Iraq. By making it speculative fiction, Mackie is able to deal with issues that are frankly too sensitive to discuss directly.

I would love to see this on DVD one day.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A superb and thought-provoking alternate history
GusF3 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Set in a world in which Nazi Germany won the Second World War, this is a superb and thought-provoking alternate history. A Nazi victory is one of the best known and most frequently utilised alternate history concepts, one which was already decades old in 1978. It has produced some of the best stories in the history of the genre as well as some of the worst. This three part serial approached the concept through the lens of television as it concerns the production of a soap opera entitled "An Englishman's Castle" which takes place in London in 1940 during the Nazi invasion and subsequent occupation of the UK. The serial is brilliantly written by Philip Mackie whose script hits all of the right notes and skilfully directed by Paul Ciappessoni, both BBC stalwarts.

The serial stars Kenneth More in a wonderful performance as Peter Ingram, the 58-year-old creator, writer and producer of "An Englishman's Castle". Ingram fought in the war and joined the resistance after the occupation. He hid out in the hills with his comrades for months - comparing the situation to that of the ancient Britons, who had themselves been faced with numerous Roman invasions - until the German occupiers announced an amnesty for all resistance fighters. The Nazis still have a tight grip on the UK in 1978. However, the British government of Quislings maintains a façade of normal life. To that end, not a single swastika is seen. Discounting a fictional Nazi named Heinz in the soap who is intended to be likeable, the only German seen is a beautiful young woman named Anya. Her appearance and demeanour do not exactly scream "oppressor." For his part, Ingram turns a blind eye to the realities of Nazi rule in Britain, which includes a police force which appears civilised but is in actuality every bit as brutal and sadistic as the Gestapo.

Over the course of its three year existence, the soap has become not only the most popular show on British television but a huge success in German-dominated Europe, being broadcast in 15 countries altogether. The main characters of the soap are Mr. and Mrs. Worth, their sons Frank and Bert and the latter's one-time fiancée Sally. In a typical soap opera twist, Sally and Frank have fallen madly in love, which Sally chooses to reveal to Bert the night before Frank leaves to fight the German invasion. Mrs. Worth is oblivious to this and seats Sally between the two brothers, an obvious piece of writing on Ingram's part.

The soap plays a vital role in perpetuating the collaborationist government's myth that the Nazis really aren't all that bad and that all right thinking people should want peace and comfortable lives at all costs. Fortunately, Mackie is nowhere near the obvious writer and "terrible crap merchant" that Ingram is as this point nicely illustrates that period dramas often say as much or sometimes even more about the time that they were made as the time in which they are based. The soap does involve a storyline in which Bert joins the resistance after Frank is killed and another in which their father suffers a heart attack after listening to news on the progress of the invasion on the radio. However, these elements are designed to remind the British people that they put up a fight before Germany achieved victory so they don't feel bad about themselves. It's really just another way of keeping the population docile.

Ingram is perfectly willing to keep his head down and go along with the status quo until the programme controller Harmer, played by a suitably slimy and intimidating Anthony Bate in an extraordinarily effective performance, objects to a character being given the name of Rosenthal. Ingram tells him that the character is drawn from life, a tribute to a Jewish friend of his who was later killed in a concentration camp. For perhaps the first time in years, Ingram begins to question the role that he is playing in his society.

Ingram, who is married with two grown sons, has a history of taking young actresses to his bed and Jill Freeman, who plays Sally, is the latest recipient of that dubious honour. Jill, played in an excellent performance by Ilsa Blair, makes no secret of the fact that she has no great love for either her part or the soap. However, for reasons of her own safety, she does keep two other pieces of information secret: her Jewish heritage and her membership of the underground resistance. She tells Ingram that she was ordered to get close to him so that she could recruit him and have him include the code phrase for the long-planned uprising in the soap. Ingram's relationship with Jill serves to reawaken the romantic part of his nature, which had been dormant since 1940. He is also faced with challenges in his family life as his radical youngest son Mark, played by a very young Nigel Havers, hates him for his role in perpetuating the aforementioned myths of 1940 and is arrested as a terrorist. Conversely, his elder son Henry, played by David Meyer, is a floor manager on the soap who later becomes one of its directors, though not before he proves himself to be politically reliable.

The serial also features strong performances from Kathleen Byron, Noel Dyson, Peter Hughes, Philip Bond, Frederick Treves and Anthony Stafford. I'm not sure whether it is a coincidence or a casting in-joke but, like her character, Dyson is best known for playing a woman with two grown sons in a hugely popular soap opera, having played Ida Barlow in the early days of "Coronation Street".

Ingram notes that both Frank and Bert are representations of idealised parts of his own nature. Mackie may have similarly been inspired by his own experiences since he worked for the Ministry of Information Films Division making propaganda films, albeit of a very different kind, during the war.

Overall, this is a first rate alternate history which raises many interesting questions about acquiescence to authority and the ways in which fiction can shape hearts and minds.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Acknowledgment should be given to Philip K. Dick
new-myth24 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I remember seeing this well-made and effective series on PBS.

However, I believe at least acknowledgment should be given to the 1962 novel, "The Man In the High Castle," by Philip K. Dick. It is set in an alternate America where Germany and Japan won WWII, and have divided up the former United States. One character has written a best-selling book called "The Grasshopper Lies Heavy," about an alternate America where Germany and Japan lost WWII. It is a source of inspiration and nostalgia for some.

Two main parallel elements are Germany winning WWII, and a popular work of nostalgia with "Castle" in the title.

I would not call this plagiarism, but an interesting similarity. Maybe an unconscious influence, or simply a coincidence.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Englishman's Castle - outstanding TV Drama
MEvans474217 September 2008
I saw this series in 1978 and have remembered it ever since. The plot was subtle, not at all affected; the acting was good, the series engaging. The premise was plausible - Germany invaded the UK successfully in 1940 and Nazism dominated Europe ever since. It is obvious from the conversations that Germany probably did not invade the Soviet Union, that the USA did not become involved in Europe, that a Nazi Germany survived into the 1970s and dominated Europe in the same way that in real history the Soviet Union dominated the Warsaw Pact - not outright occupation of all areas but control and influence. The characters behaved as if they had been living for nearly forty years in a 'European Union' which was in actuality a Nazi-dominated Germanic/'aryan' empire. But nothing about the setting was extreme, outwardly in physical terms the UK looked like the 1970s UK actually did. What was different was the cultural and political background. In many ways the UK was materially better off than we felt it to be in 1978 - in one scene a lead character says, ironically, something like: 'Law and order, no strikes, good jobs, full employment and a good pension when you retire. Its not a bad life under the Germans, eh?' The badness was under the surface of this materially wealthy totalitarian state. This holds lessons for today. I recommend this series very highly.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed