When a judge is charged with rape, Arthur Kirkland is forced to defend him. Kirkland has had problems with the judge in the past, including one incident when the judge wrongly sentenced his client Jeff McCullaugh because of a technicality. Kirkland faces a moral and legal dilemma.Written by
Melissa Portell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
A girl has been raped by a judge. All the evidence to free the judge is fake. The judge doesn't care, but his defense does. Now the defense has been issued an ultimatum: get the judge acquitted, or be disbarred. What can you do when the law is abused by those trained to uphold it? See more »
When Gail and Arthur are eating Chinese takeout, Gail opens the same container twice. See more »
You know I don't like those penny-ante cases. I was doing you a favor!
Favor? What kind of favor?
It's all nickel and dime, Arthur! It's all nickel and dime!
Don't you care? Warren, don't you even care?
If you cared so much, why weren't you in the courtroom? Goddamn right I do care! But, not about them.
They're people, Warren. They're all - they're people. They're just people.
See more »
This movie is compelling. It is not just a supremely entertaining courtroom drama, but more so a brilliantly detailed character study. Al Pacino, predictably, is just class, and the other characters give him some very competent support. The interweaving of secondary cases with the main one is seamless, and keeps the pace moving at a pleasing level. The ending, which is so often talked about, is terrific, if a little sudden, and not totally satisfying. The script is faultless. My only criticism is that the disco soundtrack is incongruous with the serious issues at hand and at times pretty comical. But I guess the time period is perfectly evoked through it, not that the issues are exclusively relevant to the late 70s/early 80s though. 9/10.
4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this