Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
524 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Whoa! A good sequel!!
Anonymous_Maxine5 April 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I say that, of course, in reference to the expected quality of a movie like this. In general, horror series like the seemingly endless Friday the 13th series are composed of one hugely successful original film (generally, by today's standards, inexplicably so, despite the abysmal standards of today) followed by a lot of stomach-turningly awful sequels that try in vain to recapture the success of the original film. The first sequel in the Friday the 13th series, however, seems to escape that trend, although it never manages to be much better than the original, which wasn't that great in the first place. But at the very least, even the Austin Powers series went more precipitously downhill than Friday the 13th.

The movie takes place several years after the original ended, and since Mrs. Voorhees was the real killer in the original (which we all know because we've all seen Scream) and was beheaded at the end, we now have to have a real killer. The thing that helps this movie escape the treacherous realms of the sophomore effort is that it presents the story so well. Jason has lived in the woods since his mother was killed (a horrifying event which the young Jason witnessed), not interacting with a human being in any way in all those years. In order to seek revenge for his mother's murder, he has been savagely stalking and murdering anyone who comes close to his area of the lake.

Not exactly the most intricate storyline, but at least it's not some mindless killer running around killing any teenager daring enough to get involved in any kind of sexual behavior (an extremely popular motive in cheesy horror movies). In this case, promiscuity is punished because Jason supposedly drowned because the counselors who were supposed to be watching him were making out when he was screaming for help.

There is a cheesy fireside scene where one character explains this whole thing to all of the teens who are out there training to be counselors, which obviously ends with one person in disguise jumping out of the bushes screaming and scaring the hell out of everyone around the fire. The movie then jumps into auto-pilot for most of the film, becoming your typical slasher movie, but at least they took the time to explain why all these killings were happening, right?

This makes me wonder, however, why they would cover Jason's face with a cheap piece of bedsheet with a little hole torn in it for one of his eyes. They've seen Halloween! They know the effectiveness of an expressionless mask, so why not be a little more creative here? The only reason I can think of is that Jason lives in the woods and doesn't exactly have access to things like the costume store where Michael Meyers got his mask, but he did have access to axes and machetes and candles and whatnot. Surely in all those years he could have come up with something at the very least a little more comfortable to wear or easier to see through.

At the very end of the film, by the way, we are treated to a close up and slow motion look at Jason's real face (something that we never get to see of Michael Meyers, although we almost do in one of the films), as he leaps through a window to grab the last girl left alive. And what a face! No wonder nobody wants to play with him!

As far as the killings themselves, Friday the 13th Part 2 fits in with most other 80s slasher films, which are little more than exercises in coming up with new and interesting ways to kill people, because we already know the formula from countless slasher films made before. In this case, there are certainly some creative murders, and the film even confused me with feelings of sympathy for Jason near the end, particularly when he is holding his arms up trying to get away from the chainsaw.

The poor guy! Someone killed his mom for avenging his death, and he's lived in the woods alone his whole life! He's the victim here! Okay, I wouldn't go that far, but I definitely felt badly for the poor guy when he fell off the chair and then almost got chainsawed. But luckily he's soon back on his feet (even after almost being cut completely in half with a weak swing of a machete) goring people with big scary knives and reminding us of the dangers of messing with him. Or, as it were, being anywhere near Camp Crystal Lake.

This is also, by the way, the last time that any sympathy can be felt for anyone dumb enough to go up to the lake. The rest of the sequels are filled with people who deserve to die anyway for being so dumb. Well, at least his mask improves from this point on.
37 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My favorite of the series
bensonmum227 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
  • It's been five quiet years since a group of councilors were murdered at Camp Crystal Lake. But when a new group of councilors arrives to open a nearby camp, the killing starts all over again. Who's behind the murders? The original Camp Crystal Lake Killer is dead. Could it be her son who was believed to have died in the lake years earlier? By the time someone figures out who the killer is, most everyone else is dead.


  • Friday the 13th Part 2 has always been my favorite installment in the series. I've always thought that Jason was more frightening before he found the hockey mask and became the unstoppable iconic killer zombie. This Jason is human and that makes him more real. And, to me, the horror factor is increased when the killer is based in reality. He's a primitive being (not unsimilar to the inbred mountain men I recently wrote about in Wrong Turn) capable of extreme brutality, out to avenge the death of his mother.


  • Most of the movie is about what you would expect - grisly murders, an absence of logic, woeful dialogue, and iffy acting. Friday the 13th Part 2 also features just about every horror cliché that fans have come to expect in a teen slasher. When I saw this movie in 1981, a lot of what we consider teen slasher clichés were still being developed. Back then, a lot of this was still fairly new and fresh. And whether I should or not, I still see the movie the way I did in 1981.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Worthy Sequel
caspian197813 October 2004
While most sequels cash in on their original movie's fame, the second part of the Friday the 13th series lives up to its name. Unlike the first movie, Jason stars in this movie while his "mother" has the cameo. The gore and the kill scenes surpass the original. The characters are true teenage stereotypes. Much like the ending in the original, the ending here is great. A jump out of your seat moment that lives up to the original. This is way before Jason wears his hockey mask. Here we are witnessed to a masked killer that uses a pillow case to hide his scary identity. From here on, the fame of PART 2 made it possible for the next bunch of films to happen. It is pretty much all down hill from here. While some of those films lived up to being great horror movies, most fell short and could not recycle the same effect that PART 2 had on its audience.
28 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arguably the best of all nine sequels.
uds32 September 2002
So many refer to this as the debut of Jason Voorhees. It wasn't...simply the debut of him killing people. He left that to his mom in part one! Steve Miner didn't mess around too much with Sean Cunninham's successful formula simply adding some quite inventive kills and bloodletting.

No-one could be accused of using method-acting here, truth is its all pretty embarrassing. The high-school script though probably isn't that much out of place - they are schoolkids after all.

Jason himself, though still slightly diminished of stature is one creepy little dude, still without his hockey mask but wearing a burlap sack with holes cut out for his eyes. What appears to be his demise is of course anything but...as parts 3 to 10 will attest. The final 15 minutes are quite tension-filled and better than anything in the original.

A must-see for devotees of the series.
58 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Isn't all that great untill the last 15 minutes
MissCzarChasm19 July 2000
Friday the 13th 2 works on some level mostly because this is the first film that features the Jason character as the killer. He's somewhat menancing but this film suffers from being kind of boring and not nearly as good as the original.

The film opens on Alice, the survivor of the original film, still haunted by the events that took place at crystal lake. in the next 5 minutes lets just say she'll won't have to think about it anymore. afew years later a camp site has opened not too far from camp and jason is not to happy with this.

It moves kind of slow and known of the characters are really that great except for our herioine ginny. The make up effects are still great and the last 15 minutes do satisfy.

As a film of its own it's pretty good, but as a sequel to a so called slasher classic it doesn't really compare
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Introducing Jason
TheLittleSongbird6 January 2018
'Friday the 13th' may have been panned by critics when first released but since then it is one of the most famous and influential horror films, the franchise containing one of horror's most iconic villains. The film is popular enough to become a franchise and spawn several sequels of varying quality and generally inferior to the one that started it all of.

Of the sequels, 'Friday the 13th Part 2' is one of the better ones easily and one of the few instalments to be as good, even on par. It's not perfect, it's not what one would call great. It does however achieve its primary goals well, it is scary and it is fun. Plus it introduces Jason Voorhees as the antagonist, so it is an important sequel in the series in this respect.

Like the first 'Friday the 13th', 'Friday the 13th Part 2' is far from the best when it comes to acting. The exceptions are appealing Amy Steel and a truly freaky Warrington Gillette. Everybody else ranges from average to dead-end.

Nor is it the best when it comes to dialogue. Much of it is very crude and cheesy. Or character development, and what the film does worse than the original is that we don't sympathise with the characters here as much apart from Ginny. The ending is a head-scratcher and pretty nonsensical, not the truly unsettling one of the first film.

Visually, on the other hand, it improves over the original 'Friday the 13th' quite drastically. It's still creepy but has more of a professional, slicker look and like more time was dedicated to it. Like 'Friday the 13th', 'Friday the 13th Part 2' is very gory and gruesome, though not pointlessly so, but it is also very frightening and suspenseful.

This is apparent in the deaths, which are still very creative and shocking, and the hauntingly eerie music score. 'Friday the 13th' is assuredly directed and moves along at a lively pace. As said, Steel carries the film with a good deal of appealing charm and Gillette proves why Jason is often considered an iconic character in horror.

Overall, pretty good sequel and one of the better ones of a variable franchise. 7/10 Bethany Cox
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than some
jane-cobb-330-7655754 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Like most low-budget horror films, "Friday the 13th Part 2" is not a well-made film. The cinematography is bland, the dialogue laughable, and the acting...oh, the acting. However, of all the "Friday the 13th" films, this installment contains the most interesting story elements and the scariest scenes. Consider this: A deformed homicidal man-beast stalks unsuspecting counselors wearing a potato sack over his head; one crazy eye stares through a hole. He is territorial, keeping others off his land as an act of revenge over the decapitation of his mother (which he witnessed). He survives off the wilderness and lives in a dilapidated shack in the woods where his mother's head sits amidst a circle of candles and an increasing pile of dead bodies.

If the filmmakers had handled the material well, it could have been a monumentally scary film of "Exorcist" and "Blair Witch" scale. Unfortunately, the underdevelopment of most of the characters and the noticeably lackluster aesthetic qualities drag this down into Bad Movie Land. On the other hand, there are parts to this film that are as scary as anything out there. Most of these moments are singular shots or images, and there's usually not enough fright to last an entire sequence.

If you like the series though, you will probably enjoy this sequel as well.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring
spidrw3b21 March 2023
I could hardly stand watching this, the characters were extremely shallow and boring. Every "scare" (if you could call it that) didn't make me even jump once, or cause any sort of emotion. The whole movie I was waiting for it to end.

There was no interesting hook at all and it was extremely slow yet fast at the same time? I'd honestly rather being doing many sheets of algebra compared to this. It's a disgrace to the original and all sequels in general In conclusion, watch a different movie. This isn't bad but it isn't good, it's boring. Hours of nothing except for sex scenes and mediocre horror, and not even the good kind of mediocre.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best sequel my favorite Amy Steel is the best heroine of the 80's ever
ivo-cobra824 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
In my opinion this sequel is my favorite Friday the 13th film it is It is one of my personal favorite horror movie because of Amy Steel! I am a big fan of the actress and I love her to death in Friday the 13th Part 2. This movie is my number 4 favorite slasher Friday the 13th film in the series and I love Amy Steel so damn much as Ginny Field! She was the best heroine in the slasher films in my opinion. I love this film to death and I enjoy it and love it the same as the first one I love the atmosphere in the film. It has the best kills in the series. Characters are fairly well-developed and likable, at least for this franchise, and there are plenty of thrills. One of the most memorable final shocks rounds everything out.

It is Jason Voorhees first outing as the murderer and the image of him wearing the potato sack over his head is burned into my retinas as one of the most memorable in the franchise.

Amy Steel is a brilliant addition to the cast, a great heroine I love her to death in "Friday The 13th part 2" and I also love her in April Fool's Day she was excellent in those two films. She is always my favorite lead and I really enjoy Friday the 13th Part 2 more then the first one.

Friday the 13th Part 2 is a great sequel great horror slasher movie that made Jason Voorhees memorial cool horror icon.

This time the film was directed and produced by Steve Miner who I thought did an excellent job directing the film. This time for the special makeup effects was Carl Fullerton who did the right job like Tom Savini did with the first one.

I love how Amy Steel defend her self against Jason Voorhees who was this time played by actor Steve Daskawisz with a potato sack. Amy Steel used chain saw on Jason that scene was copied by Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning and was also used and copied in Maniac Cop 2 I just didn't like it. Watch the climatic fight between Jason and Ginny in which Ginny imitates Jason's mom Pamela (Betsy Palmer) and then she swings with a machete towards Jason and Jason raises the mattock to block Ginny's machete swing this was an epic Climatic fight in the movie.

Ginny Field with working tool fork in the hands is just memorial all over Amy Steel's picture we see her on IMDb and every where.

Mrs. Voorhees is dead, and Camp Crystal Lake is shut down, but a camp next to the infamous place is stalked by an unknown assailant.

Adrienne King and Walt Gorney did return that was a surprise for me and the were the first characters to die in the beginning of the film.

Adrienne King wanted to reprise her role as Alice, but she said that she wanted to be on screen for a short period of time because there was an obsessive fan who was stalking her, broke into her apartment, and she feared for her life. So I respect the actress and her decision since this film she never return on TV screen but she lend her voice to animation movies. Adrienne King filmed all of her scenes in two days then she run faster as she could.

Amy Steel has stated that she found shooting the "window scene" difficult. The shot required three takes and her frightened reaction is genuine. Because the shot was in slow-motion, a high-speed camera was used, and every time she heard the film start running, she would tense up and get scared. Amy was very upset with the director for the window scene and it was really annoyed cause director keep shouting they have to repeat the scenes.

Great horror slasher suspense entertaining 80's movie my all time favorite horror film I still going to watch it. I watched this film 7 years ago when I was a big fan of Supernatural and I heard Jared Padalecki auditioned for his lead role in Friday the 13th reboot and I was curious so I went watching this film alongside with the first original film and Jason X before I watched reboot that was my fourth film I saw.

I remember seeing this movie on DVD in the video store when I was in high school. I wasn't interesting seen it that time but today I am glad I have this film on Blu-ray, just got it this Thursday all 11th films and I watch it in Friday 22th this is the 3d time in the row I saw this film and i still will.

This is one in my top 5 favorite Friday the 13th films it is my number four favorite slasher Friday the 13th movie and it is the best one. The movie it self's get's my Bad-Ass Seal Of Approval 10/10 Amy Steel is the queen of screamers and she is way better then Jamie Lee Curtis in my opinion.
92 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than the first
SnoopyStyle19 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
After the first movie, Alice Hardy (Adrienne King) is still haunted by Mrs. Voorhees killing everybody at the camp. Her nightmare comes true as she is killed off immediately. It's been quiet for about 5 years. A new camp is opened nearby to train camp counselors. It's not too long when the killings start all over again.

This is a better movie than the original. The production value is superior. This is a no non-sense serial killer movie. Everything just look better than the original. There isn't a big future star in the mix, but Amy Steel is pretty good as Ginny. However it is still just a functional slasher movie and nothing more.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A horror "classic" that isn't.
richardwworkman30 April 2021
For a movie that's almost universally held up as a perfect sequel in the now ubiquitous horror franchise, it's actually not very good.

The problem is the sequel was made better as another film, The Burning, a far more gruesome though equally flawed.

For me this spends too much time looking at the pretty girls taking their tops off trying to develop sympathy for the victims rather than getting to the whole reason for watching the film in the first place, gory bloody murders!

And it doesn't deliver in the gore department either. It's all a bit sanitised and tame.even the final girl get rescued by her night in shining armour.

I suppose it's worth watching for the novelty value but I've had breakfasts more scary than this.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A classic sequel
ontheis4 October 2020
After the original movie, comes it's sequel with iconic Jason as the killer for the first time. Some memorable scenes, a few repetitions but still entertaining, makes this movie a worthy second part of the franchise. If you expect less than the first one, you'll have fun watching.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"These kids smoke better dope than I do."
utgard149 April 2014
The first Friday the 13th sequel follows the formula with more camp counselors showing up at Camp Crystal Lake and being slaughtered one by one. This is the first of the series where Jason is the killer, although he doesn't yet have his iconic hockey mask. He wears a sack over his head instead. He also gets kicked in the nads. Pretty funny, honestly.

The cast is full of young actors playing obnoxious teens and twenty-somethings. Adrienne King briefly reprises her role from the first film before Amy Steel takes over as the 'final girl.' Acting-wise, Steel's an improvement I think. This one also has more cute girls than the first movie and more nudity, which would become a prerequisite for the series. The tracking shot of Kirsten Baker's rear end as she walks through the woods is priceless. As with the first movie, I really liked the locations they filmed at. Gives an authentic atmosphere to the film without appearing cheap, like most of today's low-budget horror films do. If you like old-school slashers, you'll like this one. It's solid entertainment that you don't have to take seriously, despite the macabre subject matter.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Much Better Than the Original
evanston_dad14 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The sequel to the woefully remedial "Friday the 13th" improves on the original film, which is sort of like saying slightly curdled milk is an improvement on really curdled milk, but I digress.

Part 2 is better if only because Jason is the actual killer, not that weird androgynous mother lady. He wears a really creepy pillow case or something over his head instead of his hockey mask, and it's actually a scarier effect than the more iconic image--he should have stuck with it. There's a long prologue in which the only survivor from the first film eventually gets an ice pick in the forehead, but only after she's been repeatedly scared by the phone, a cat, etc. This opening is actually pretty nerve-racking, and it sets the tone for the rest of the movie, in which the kills are more original than the first (I'm a particular fan of the handicapped kid who gets a machete in the face and then is sent bouncing down some garden steps in his wheelchair) and the nudity is more bountiful and gratuitous. I'm not even going to try to justify my enjoyment of slasher movies---they speak to the basest instincts in all of us and are really morally repellent, but, hey, I like what I like.

One of the better episodes in the interminable series.

Grade: C+
27 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Same same, but a bit different
kosmasp5 November 2020
I am just going to assume you have seen the first Friday 13th movie. I mean if you haven't ... why would you watch the sequel! It clearly states so in the title, that this is not the first one. Which makes it even crazier that this rehashes the last minutes of the first film. While Cunningham didn't get how or why they would bring back Jason Vorhees (he was dead, wasn't he?), Steve Miner took over ... and quite the job he had to undertake. Make the same movie but a bit different.

So right from the start we get rid of what remained from the first movie (excluding Jason that is). And then we get more teenagers for him to be mad at. Why you ask? Does it really matter? Let's say because they can live a life he never could and he hates them for it. That should be good enough. We also get a final girl that is quite clever. Even if not as asexual as some might remember her. She's quite flirty isn't she? Rhetorical question that was.

This sequel does not just see a different Jason actor ... it sees many of them. Apparently a lot of crew members literally stepped into his shoes. Though Steve Dash is the one who seems to take most credit for it. Some may question that, with other stunt man trying to make their case, but it seems he did the heavy lifting (or glass related stunt breakthrough) ... no pun intended.

Since the first Friday movie was so popular but also had many people who were shocked at the gore it had (again quite tame from todays standards), this had quite the issues. Especially because it tried to outdo the first one. So quite a few things landed on the cutting room floor. While this has more blood then, it seems to have less nudity. Though that does not matter that much I think - it's more about the killings isn't it? I think most would agree.

While this also contains Jason as character and killer, sort of the first time, it is not the Jason most might know, especially thinking of the later movies here ...
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent sequel
danielbarrett-6110516 January 2017
"Friday the 13th--Part 2" is a worthwhile film for horror fans. True, it's quality is not on par with "The Exorcist", but the film does try to incorporate a deeper context, even some sympathy, around the iconic villain, Jason. The audience is even provided with an idea of how Jason has been surviving in the wilderness. In this sequel, a group of teenage counselors are attending a counselors' training camp near Crystal Lake, five years after the events in the first movie. Jason begins to target the interlopers using a diversity of tools and methods that keep each kill scene fresh. Near the climax of the film, we get to see that he is concealing his face with a burlap sack (the hockey mask doesn't appear until later films) which adds a strong menacing air to the character.

One negative, in my opinion, is the extended dream sequence at the beginning of the film composed of snippets from the first film. I know that the purpose behind this was to review what had previously happened, but it seemed pointlessly long unless it was also a means of making the film a bit longer. Also, there were several jump scares which I consider a cheap way of exciting an audience's reaction. I personally prefer a buildup of authentic tension, but that is generally not the way in which 80s slasher films are built.

Slasher films like this aren't meant to be thought about too deeply, but I do appreciate the effort to build a stronger story about the villain. Overall, this is a decent sequel and a worthwhile film for classic horror fans.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This movie get a lot campy as time goes on, but at least, Part 2 wasn't too stupid. The movie does have its scary moments. Jason really hates counselling.
ironhorse_iv13 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Steve Miner, the film marks the first time Jason Voorhees (Warrington Gillett unmasked/stuntman Steve Daskawisz when masked) is the antagonists in the film series, as his mother, Pamela (Betsy Palmer) was the killer in the previous film. Jason Voorhees's motive is crystal clear in this film. It is a direct sequel to Friday the 13th, picking up five years after that film. He has to take revenge on Alice Hardy (Adrienne King) who killed his mother in the conclusion of the previous movie. After that, he must try to get rid of the rest of the camp counselors in nearby training camp. It's just another manic Friday for him. Originally, Friday the 13th Part 2 was not intended to be a direct sequel to the 1980 original, but rather part of an anthology series of films based around the Friday the 13th superstition. Like the Halloween film franchise, after the popularity of the original film, villain attacking the heroine, the filmmakers decided to bring back Jason and the mythology surrounding Camp Crystal Lake, a trend which would be repeated for the rest of the series. Stylistically, Friday the 13th Part 2 had a lot of the same elements that made the original Friday the 13th a sleeper hit in 1980, such as first-person camera perspectives, gory stalk-and-slash scenes with the same eerily music, and sex/nudity. One of the biggest problems of the film is trying to connect this to the previous film. The movie took forever to recap the last film. This film has one of the longest pre-credit sequences in cinematic history, nearly 15 minutes in some versions. The main different between this film and the last is the lack of suspense. You know, whom the killer is, this time. It's also, sucks that the movie series lacks a strong "it girl". I was really hoping for a strong female protagonist like Ellen Ripley from the Alien film series or Laurie Strode from the Halloween series in these films. It kinda sucks that the final girl, Alice Hardy from the last movie was kill off, pretty quick in the beginning. Adrienne King was pursued by an obsessed fan after the success of the original Friday the 13th and wished her role to be small as possible in the sequel, because of that. I really find it very odd that the movie has her being stalk and killed as if she was being attacked by that crazy fan. In my opinion, she should had refused to retake the role, until the problems of her personal life was taken care of. Ginny Field (Amy Steel) is alright replacement. The final girl often shares common characteristics: she is typically sexually unavailable or virginal, avoiding the vices of the victims, very sympathizing people that becomes masculinized through "phallic appropriation" by taking up a weapon. Ginny is nothing like the common final girl. Ginny has a lot of vices, sleeps with her boss and mostly catatonic and useless in the end. It undermines the notion of positive final girl. The whole idea that she can pass off as Voorhees mother by wearing her old sweater is a bit goofy. I wasn't impressed with any of the actors acting here, but honestly most of the supporting characters were pretty likable. None of them, had any of the mean-spirit traits, the later films would later put on. It's weird that the teenagers that went off to drink and party, didn't die first in this film. It's weird that the movie would even have the nerves to kill a character with a disability like Mark (Tom McBride). Kirsten Baker as Terry was very sexy, and pretty much, worth watching, just to see her nude scenes. Jason was still pretty sinister, despite, not yet, dawning the hockey mask. The potato sack mask kinda remind me of 1980's Elephant Man in how creepy it was. The movie gorn is pretty intense. The Make Up work is just as good as the first film. The movie had to be cut by approx. 1 minute to secure the R rating, and not an X rating. Some scene, the editing is clearly visible. As of today, none of the cuts have been restored in any way, even with newer release DVDs. The movie really had a cop-out when it came to the dog, Muffin. It's so weird, that the movie preach, it's alright to killed people in a horror, but don't dare, kill the dog. I guess, the movie didn't want to anger PETA. The film's ending has been a source of confusion for fans. Writer Ron Kurz has stated that Jason's window jump was intended to be, like a jump scare like the first film in reality. However, like the beginning of this film, the beginning of Part III, in replaying the end clip, showed Jason jumping into them, as if a dream. In an unused ending, after Ginny questions where her boyfriend is, the scene switches to Mrs. Voorhees' head, which then opens its eyes and smiles, indicating that Jason had killed him. Overall: It's just a carbon copy of its predecessor that it's slowly turning into what the film series is known for. It's not bad, but it's not the worst. It's just mediocre. Worth checking if you want to have cheap thrills.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Friday the 13th Part 2: Hard to understand how this become so iconic
Platypuschow3 October 2017
I'm currently binge watching the Friday 13th franchise as up until now I'd only ever seen the last two films. I was astounded how generic and lifeless the first movie was and this sequel isn't far off.

Here in Jason Voorhees's debut before he finds his iconic mask he is remarkably bad. What I mean by that is he's a bumbling incompetent fool and a shell of what he is destined to become. A couple of scenes near the end of the film are almost comical because of how bad he is at being a killer.

With mostly cutaway deaths, very thin storyline and little to set it apart from every other camp slasher film I'm starting to wonder how this franchise reached the pinnacle it did as I'm 2 films in and not impressed in the slightest.

The Good:

Follows directly on from the original

Well cast

The Bad:

Jason really used to suck!

Highly generic stuff

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

A person cannot say "Hey you guys" without me thinking of the Goonies

Jason Voorhees weakness is his balls, who knew!?
17 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Simple horror at its best.
DUKE112 April 2002
Friday the 13th part 2 is a great horror film and is the best in the series. Has its share of sex drugs and blood easy to follow with a great opening. Amy Steel gives a good performance as our heroine and the rest of the cast is fine as well.

This film moves at a nice pace has its jump scares and builds up nicely to the final chase. I think this film has stood the test of time nicely does not ever seem too dated in anyway no crazy hillbilly music score (such as in the Burning, Bloody Valentine from the same time}.

Simple horror at its best.
31 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No Kevin Bacon in This One.
PCC09215 December 2022
Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981), opens up about two months after the events in the first film. We are treated to a prologue before the beginning credits. Then the film jumps five years into the future. A new group of good-looking, sometimes idiotic, camp counselors are at good, old Camp Crystal Lake. They are at a camping area in another part of the lake area. The old camping area is closed off. Although they had shot some of the footage for this film at the same old town seen in the first film, most of this film was shot in Connecticut, in the towns of New Preston and Kent. The shooting location moved from New Jersey to Connecticut. The change isn't too dramatic. Both locations look about the same.

Friday the 13th (1980), ignited a subgenre, by strengthening what the film, Halloween (1978), started. This film begins the legend of Jason Vorhees, in the fact that, Jason actually makes his first appearance in this film. So, if we take Jason out of the equation in the first film and go with the idea, that the boy in the lake was part of a dream sequence Alice dreamed up, then Jason wasn't actually there in the boat scene. Also, the police officers confirmed, that none of the things in the boat, Alice claims, happened that night. Also, we all saw Jason's mother do all the killings in the first film, which is all covered in the prologue in this film. When the killings start to happen in this film, we still do not know who the killer really is. We all know its going to be Jason from pop-culture history, but that is still not totally clear, until the end of the film. We do know, that the legend says, as told to us by one of the counselors, that Jason saw his mother die that night and that sets him off in this film.

Amy Steel plays Ginny, who is the character, that gets the information, for the audience, about the events that happened at the end of the last film. She is the one who brings out the answer, that we all know now in the 21st century, but didn't in 1981, who the actual killer is. What makes things even more interesting is, we still haven't gotten to the famous hockey mask yet after two movies. There are no big Kevin Bacon moments in this film. There are no big stars in this film or no future stars either. The film was directed by Steve Miner. He would go on to direct the next film, Friday the 13th Part III (1982), because this film wasn't too bad, so give him another one to do. Minor is also known for directing House (1985) and Lake Placid (1999).

6.6 (C- MyGrade) = 7 IMDB.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
better than the first
acidburn-1027 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Five years after the horrible massacre at Camp Crystal Lake, all that remains is the legend of Jason Voorees and the death of his demented mother who had murdered 7 campers until one get her.

It starts of with Alice (Adrienne King) the survivor of the first one, having nightmares about the events of 5 years ago at camp crystal lake. She's living alone in a spooky house and talks to her mother on the phone about trying to put her life back together, unaware that Jason is lurking around outside, she jumps in the shower and gets phonecall, a hang up from Jason, she goes into the kitchen, opens the fridge door finds a human head and Jason pops up and rams a screwdriver through her head.

Then we meet Sandra (Marta Kober) and Jeff (Bill Randolf), on a payphone to they're friend, then Crazy Ralph from the first one appears warning them like last time "I Told the others they didn't believe me, you're all doomed, you're all doomed".

Eventually they join the other campers at a camp site near camp crystal lake, we get the new meat head councilor Paul Holt (John Furey), Terri (Kirsten Baker) one of the early victims, Ted (Stuart Charno) the funny one, Jeff and Sandra the carefree lovers, Mark (Tom McBride) wheelchair guy, Vicky (Lauren Marie Taylor) the nice girl, Scott (Russell Todd) the charmer and last but not least the main heroine Ginny (Amy Steel) who's the best last girl out of the entire series in my opinion.

Overall, much better than the first one, the deaths are wicked especially the one with the 2 people in bed together getting speared, and even the guy in the wheelchair gets it, in the face with the machete, Crazy Ralph (Walt Gorney) makes a final appearance as crazy ralph before he gets garotted with barb wire and the one with the guy gets caught in the trap and has his throat slit hanging upside down.

The only standout performance is from Ginny (Amy Steel) who was also impressive in April Fools Day, really goes for it with Jason in the final showdown between killer and heroine.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fine sequel to a Halloween knockoff.
jackbruns2930 December 2020
Don't get me wrong. Even the creators of the first movie admitted Friday the 13th was a knockoff of Halloween.

That said. Probably the biggest detractors to this movie are those who correctly point out that Jason Voorhees was supposed to be long dead even in the original movie. But I'm fine with it. It's a movie that knows what it is, and delivers. Personally, my own fan-fiction envisioned maybe Jason somehow making it to the shore, and nobody, not even his mother noticing that. Unfortunately, he becomes brain damaged due to lack of oxygen, and so is even more unreasonable and ashamed of his condition. So he watches his mother from a distance, until with horror watches as his mother's head is cut off. After Alice leaves, he takes his mother's head and heads back to his shack - already planning his vengeance. At least that's how I see it.

Anyway, the plot itself is almost identical to the first, except with different camp counselors, and Jason Voorhees doing the kills instead of his mother. It's still great for what it is. It knows what it is. It's a very well made slasher B movie with some good special effects and good cinematography and a good ending. It's not the best one. That would be part four. It's not the funnest. That would be part six. But it's still pretty darn good.

And did I mention it has by far the most gorgeous lady of the entire series in Kirsten Baker?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Before the Iconic Hockey Mask
Rainey-Dawn23 April 2023
This film was the first of the series to feature Jason himself as a killer and without his iconic hockey mask. How this 2nd film spun off countless other 'Jason' films is beyond me.

I watched the Friday 13th 1980s series as a teen and today I'm rewatching them again only to find the same thing as I did years ago - Jason isn't as good as the others (Michael Myers and Freddy Krueger), in my opinion.

In this 2nd film we start the stereo-typical horror slasher, horny 20-somethings in the woods getting killed. There isn't much of a story to films like this.

There is some gore and blood - plenty of on screen killings in this movie so if that's your thing then you might like this film.

5/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Inherent improvement
oharab-4288411 November 2022
You can't argue the fact that the first sequel to Friday the 13th is marginally better than the original. Although the plot seems like a poor excuse to continue the franchise and inherently doesn't make much sense with what was established with the first film. The writing is also rather simplistic, the ambiguity might not be to everyone's taste, and some of the acting wouldn't even be good enough for a community theater play, it's still a consistently intense movie that fully capitalizes on the suspense around Jason's appearance and pulls off a couple of genuinely scary/action filled moments..
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
CHEER! - (7 stars out of 10)
BJG-Reviews11 November 2021
The stage curtains open ...

The legend of Camp Crystal Lake continues in this 2nd entry into the Friday the 13th franchise featuring a whole new crop of camp counselors for Jason to knock off. Jason Vorhees moves front and center now as the main antagonist and infamous killer. The opening sequence starts us off catching us up with Alice, the first movie's sole survivor and is the foundation for not only this movie, but pretty much all the movies to follow.

We flash forward 5 years into the future when we join a new counselor crew in a camp nearby Crystal Lake, and our young, unsuspecting bunch is stalked once more by a killer unseen. By now, the story of Jason Vorhees and his mother has become a local urban legend that is whispered around campfires. One of the camp counselors, Ginny, believes that it is more than just a story. She believes that Jason is real and that his story is not only tragic, but sad. But when the truth of it all hits too close to home, the sadness is replaced with the need to survive.

As sequels go, this one was pretty good. It continued the story effectively from the first movie as we are exposed to Jason, now fully grown and running around through the trees with a burlap sack over his head and a pitchfork in his grizzled hands. Yes, Jason actually runs in this movie - a brief time before he dons a hockey mask and plods heavily around through the underbrush. And watching Kirsten Baker walk through the woods in short shorts is worth the price of admission alone.

I recommend this movie at a solid 7 stars out of 10, the same rating I gave the first movie. I'm not saying it is on par with the original, but pretty close. There are some good jump scares, and memorable death scenes. The final sequence was well filmed, and the final scare was worth the wait. Dark tones, good visuals, and a fun scarefest. Friday the 13th - Part 2 delivers.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed