Alice in Wonderland (TV Mini Series 1985) Poster

(II) (1985)

User Reviews

Review this title
90 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A treat worth its time.
requiem18963 January 2005
Some people loved this rendition of Lewis Carol's work, others completely hated it. It was by no means a stunning success. I could spend the next several lines explaining what went wrong and what went right, but I won't. This isn't that type of movie.

I recommend this for a very simple reason. The movie is full of great talent. Great performances? Not really. But great talent. The enjoyment of this movie is watching some of the true greats in playful roles. If you watch this expecting great acting performances and great cinematic moments with inspiring music then you are a fool. It was never meant to be anything more than a delightfully fun experience with great moments. (Sammy Davis Jr. as the Catapillar is a great example.)

I can't describe this any other way than to say that Harry Harris got some of the most recognizable faces of Hollywood to put on stupid costumes and act crazy. Even if you don't recognize many of the names on the cast list you should watch it anyways. Several faces will be familiar without your knowing their names.

My major criticism (and warning) many of the songs are very hokey. In some scenes its damn annoying. Most people who demonize this film attack the music first and hardest. Its up to you to sit through the musical numbers you don't like and enjoy the rest of the film. IF you accept this adaptation for what it is and watch it for the right reasons, I guarantee you will be pleased you spent the time.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a delight!
kaatgrrl2 January 2005
I love this version of Alice in wonderland, because of the jaberwalkie. this movie has a dark sinister undertone running through, which Alice and wonderland should have. when I was young it always gave me weird feeling and I loved it because it scared me in a way most movies had never achieved before. It was "trippy" and fun and interesting all at the same time. The songs are o.k. but the story is divine! Carol Channing's character made me really weirded out. This is the way Alice was meant to be, confusing, a little scary and amusing rolled into one a must see a real winner! a+ if you want to treat yourself to something fun and special this version of Alice in wonderland is an instant crowd pleaser, I mean I could just go on and on but you should just watch it for yourselves.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Film for the ages-Wish todays actors could act all perform together like this
donizoladz5 August 2012
This is a great film-I watched the film as a child, and I actually played it for my kids tonight, they loved the songs, and I fell in love with the movie all over again! As I watched I thought about being a child and remembered all the actors that performed during the movie with a VERY small number of them STILL ALIVE.

It is very hard for me to watch much TV, with reality shows, and not much family shows that I grew up on. I loved the cast, my husband even forgot about all the stars that filmed the movie, and was excited to see it.

It would be great if today there could be an all-star cast for a TV movie just like this, but I doubt egos could coexist long enough for fans to have that chance. Great movie, great memories!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I fell in love all over again
gypsycaine13 August 2001
When this was first run, I liked it, but now barely recalled details of it. I was a senior in HS, and it was mainly put on to amuse my brother (but my family knew of my own fascination with Alice, lol, so I guess to amuse me too!), who didn't really care. I knew that I recognized the girl who played Alice (who was Jenny in Oliver & Co--THAT'S where I knew her from, thanks IMDB!) at the time, but never could place her. The actors and actresses took their roles and made them their own. I believe that besides Alice, the White Knight is my favorite supporting role, however. I too had nightmares at age 17 (!) of the Jabberwocky but that didn't stop me from watching it. In the many years since the details faded, but that Jabberwocky stayed with me--until I could no longer recall which version I had seen it in. I've been seeking it. I did like the 1999 version, which sits in VHS beside the Disney version (can't tell I'm a fan in general?) which I also liked. Each had their own parts that drew me in. This one, despite the problem with accents, did the same.

Yes, it's a Hollywood'ed version, so they tend to ignore the setting when it comes to accents, but would you really want to hear Sammy Davis Jr with an English accent? I did find Sally Struthers as the obnoxious Tiger Lily rather humorous (especially after her "correspondence school" commercials, iirc that she had out during that time too! It seemed to fit some how. :)

All in all, a very good movie, and one that I shall look for in Ebay, Yahoo and Amazon for a copy. I am very grateful to the local library who carried part 2, and allowed me to renew my acquaintance with this gem once again.

Dee
25 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantastic production with the perfect cast!
Etoile1 March 1999
Yes, I saw this -- so did you! This is quite possibly the best version of Alice ever, and one of the rare versions that includes Through the Looking Glass. This film is so exquisitely done that I remember being both thrilled and terrified! (My mother had to tell me that the Jabberwocky was just a costume that was hung up in a closet before I could go to sleep...and then I was afraid of my closet!) The cast is ideal -- no one else could play the Caterpillar so well as Sammy Davis Jr., and only Red Buttons could be such a perfect White Rabbit! Of course, my copy was taped over (Mom's attempts to comfort me just weren't enough, I guess!), but I would love to see it again. Find it at your local video store if you can, or order it -- but if you plan to have your kids watch it, make sure they see it in the daytime, and NOT right before naptime or bedtime!
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Alice in Wonderland
ComedyFan201022 April 2012
This is an 80's TV adaptation of both Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. A story symbolizing the growing up of Alice. I didn't watch this movie as a kid, so I don't have any fond memories. I just watched it as an adult because the cast made me curious (or should I say curiouser and curiouser?)

And the cast is definitely impressive. I was especially excited to see Ringo Star as the Mock Turtle. The acting isn't exceptional, but I would think that this is because of the fact that it is a children's movie and they tend to exaggerate acting in those. Natalie Gregory wasn't bad as Alice. For a child performer not very annoying.

Special effects are not the best, and in many cases pretty laughable, but one shouldn't forget that it is a TV movie that came out in 1985. Other than that, the decoration is very beautiful and it is all very colourful.

It feels a bit too long. Too many songs, sometimes it feels like it drags on and there isn't enough action happening. I feel that great book could have been adapted to be more exciting.

All in all it isn't a bad movie. I believe a child would like it even more than I did, and the good part is that as an adult one can enjoy watching it withe them, at least for the first time.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A REAL Children's Adaptation of a classic story with a cast you couldn't pack more fame into if you tried!
mollyccampbell-130 December 2013
First and foremost, let's get it out of the way - yes, the acting is cheesy, and yes the writing (both script and songs) are pretty simplistic and expository. I do not argue that whatsoever.

Having said that, I was two when this came out, but I guess my parents thought it would be something I would enjoy as I got older so they recorded it on the VCR for me. I watched this so many times that I wore out the tape. I was sad when Through the Looking Glass was no longer watchable, I was devastated when the first part became unusable. I forgot about it as I grew up and in the last few years, as I approached 30, I started looking around for it and found it on YouTube, of all places! I re-watched it and while doing so, took another look at the cast list.

I remember recognizing a few people when I was a kid, like Ringo and Sammy Davis Jr., but as an adult I was stunned when I realized that this movie is like a time capsule for not just some of the most famous actors and actresses over the prior fifty years, but also was a kind of introduction for many actors/actresses, as well! If you can put aside your need for a "good" adaptation (and come on, it's a kids story, kid's movie, and shouldn't be all glossed and glammed up with dialogue that is all but too clever and witty, settings overwhelmingly absurd and surreal like Tim Burton's newest adaptation (which I'm sorry, but I believe was an absolute mockery of Lewis Carroll's beautiful books).

The point of this movie is to get across the lessons of Alice in Wonderland/Through the Looking Glass - growing up, facing one's fears, and having confidence! This does precisely that, and for that I give it a 9 out of 10.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Childhood memories
harybobjoebob10 October 2020
I loved this as a kid, I would sing the music all of the time, especially the lion and the unicorn song. The jabberwocky used to give me such awful nightmares. This is an extremely entertaining movie, especially for kids, cant wait to show mine one day.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Alice in Wonderland/Through the Looking Glass
poetris6 April 2005
By far, the very best adaptation of Lewis Carrol's Alice in Wonderland. I taped this movie when I was small, only for my brother to record over it with wrestling. Since then, I have searched long and hard to find this movie. I am shocked that so few people have seen this movie, many have never even heard of it. This is not only a surprise because of the phenomenal cast line up, but the artistic and complex visuals and costume design. This is definitely a must see for all Alice In Wonderland enthusiasts, children, or fans of children's movies. As in a previous comment about this movie, I also was able to find Through the Looking Glass (the second half of the movie) much easier (and, I daresay cheaper). I recently came upon the movie on DVD on ebay, which is a lot cheaper as you get both the first and second half, for about the price of the second half on VHS. Whether DVD or VHS, though, this multi-million dollar movie is sure to entertain the whole family with the fun story line, and awe with the beautiful sets.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice 80s Musical/Fantasy
charlieoso3 January 2020
I seem to remember thi smovie coming on TV when I was in garde one. I watched it with my mom and older sister. We really enjoyed it. I do think the younger kids will enjoy this retelling of the Lewis Carroll classic about Alice (Natalie Gregory) visiting the Looking Glass Land. Not to mention there is also some humour that the adults show enjoy too.

None of the scenes or interactions with the creatures in Looking Glass Land are wasted with lots of singing. My favourite is when she meets the Mad Hatter (Anthony Newley), The March Hare (Roddy McDowall) and the Dormouse (Arte Johnson). Just remember there are some bad, cheeseball 80s effects. So, if you are expecting great special effects set that thought aside. Also has a great old school cast tahat includes Red Buttons who plays the White Rabbitt, Sammy Davis Jr., Beau Bridges and Lloyd Bridges and many, many others. Was originally shown in two parts so does clock in at over 3 hours.

On a sidenote I know this is not a Christmas movie, but every Christmas my wife and brother-in-law watch this movie as a Christmas tradition.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nothing wonderful about this fatigued television production...
moonspinner5530 December 2006
Irwin Allen presents "Alice in Wonderland"--and it's another disaster movie, although not as intended. With gloomy songs by Steve Allen and a redundant teleplay by Paul Zindel, this "Alice" is about as far removed from Lewis Carroll's fantasy as one can imagine. Zindel reduces Alice's adventures down to elemental deductions (the viewer is told exactly what is happening when we can see for ourselves), and Carroll was anything but elementary. In the lead role, young Natalie Gregory chatters away to herself, berating her own behavior, but playing the role constantly on the verge of tears (and always with a disgusted look on her face); she finds all the magically nonsensical characters shockingly rude, suddenly doing an about-face when she spots the Mad Tea Party and exclaims, "Oh goody!" Alice follows the White Rabbit down a thunder-and-lightning enhanced cavern two minutes into the production, and three minutes later is already whining about wanting to go home. Irwin Allen happily filled the many eccentric roles with most of his Hollywood pals, but the cronyism doesn't pay off: everyone looks terribly aged and fatigued. They also appear to have been over-rehearsed, and nobody's actions are spontaneous or exciting. Even Alice's cat Dinah looks non-plussed. The whole production, probably expensive for its time (and for TV), is like canned magic, with a set designer who went crazy with the shrubbery and the stepping stones. Most likely, Irwin Allen meant this to be a treat, but the star-cameos come off like vaudeville turns and Natalie Gregory is childish without being child-like. What happened to all the wonderment?
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Twinkle, Twinkle Little Bat, How I wonder where you're at...
tenthkingdom20 December 2003
Wonderfully amazing portrayal of Alice in Wonderland. The cast was superb and the story telling was excellent. Of course it doesn't hurt that the Mock Turtle is played by none other than Ringo Starr. The only copy of this film that I have owned until recently was a tapped off T.V. version that was jumpy and horribly, tapped. But I can guarantee you that it has been watched countless times none the less. This film is great for all ages and is good fun for the whole family. Children of all ages will delight in this fun-filled adventure, from the crying baby that turns into a pig to Sally Struthers playing a loud mouthed Flower, it can't get any better. The First half of the 3 hour plus film, is the best part, but the giant chess board and underlying story in the second half is just as delightful. This film is sure to become a classic of my generation.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A star-studded live action Alice in Wonderland
SimonJack14 November 2021
This TV film produced as a mini-series in time for the 1985 Christmas season may have set and still hold a record for having the most movie stars of the time in it. And, but for the young Natalie Gregory who plays Alice, every other person - all the big-time names of stage and screen of the day are in supporting roles - several with just cameo appearances. Besides that distinction, this "Alice and Wonderland" is the splashiest production of the Lewis Carrol fairy tales with live actors.

This is a very good production, although it appears to deviate some in places from Carroll's stories, "Alice's Adventure in Wonderland" and "Through the Looking-Glass." That's partly understandable when one considers the improbability of being able to have actors representing various playing cards who are then bowled over as with a dominoes effect. And, there are other differences in some of the characters and settings from the stories, and from the best animated version by Walt Disney in 1951.

Whether or not one likes fairy tales, anyone who's a movie buff should enjoy seeing some of the great actors of the mid to late 20th century in the often humorous costumes and makeup for their various roles. Red Buttons does a sort of short fast step for The White Rabbit as he scurries and hurries about. Some of the funniest roles and/or caricatures are Telly Savalas as The Cheshire Cat, Ringo Starr as The Mock Turtle, Jack Warden as The Owl, and Karl Malden as The Walrus. But there are many more that will bring smiles to adult faces.

Now, as for the kiddies, I don't think this is a very good film for the very young. And, that's somewhat true of all renditions of Alice, because some of the characters and short scenes can be scary to little ones (the Cheshire Cat, for instance). As for older kids, this may be hard to sit through in one viewing. I had to split the three hours up between two days myself. And for as cute as she is, and very capable in her role, Natalie Gregory as Alice once in a while seems a little nasty or sassy herself.

This is a good film to watch once, but not something for the film library. The makeup and costume staffs had their work cut out for them with this film. They probably had quite a bit of fun doing up some of these actors and actresses. Here are a couple of lines from this film.

The Queen of Hearts, "Didn't I tell you this morning that heads would roll?" King of Hearts, "Yes, indeed you did, dear. But, you know, it's an extraordinary thing. Heads do not roll as they used to. Nowadays they just plunk down on the ground and stay there."

The White Queen, "Tuppence a week and jam every other day." Alice, "I don't want you to hire me, and I didn't come for jam." White Queen, "Well, it's very good jaaaaam." (sic) Alice, "Well, I don't want any today any way." White Queen, "You couldn't have it if you did want it. The rule is, 'Jam tomorrow, jam yesterday, but never jam today.'" Alice, "Is not ever sometime, to jam today?" White Queen: No, it can't. It's jam every other day. Today isn't any other day, you know?"
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not one to show to the Lewis Carroll society...
Foux_du_Fafa1 May 2012
I remember seeing this version of Alice in Wonderland as quite a young child (around six) and thought that it was fantastic. Having passed the 20 mark, I decided to look at it again, and I regret doing so. Not that it tarnished any sentimental childhood memories; I honestly felt that I wasted my time. Aside from perhaps some cheap direct-to-video animated versions, this probably ranks as the worst adaptation of "Alice in Wonderland" I have ever seen. It comes across like some blind attempt at creating a latter-day "Wizard of Oz" or "Mary Poppins", and it completely fails.

It at least annoys me that they didn't get a British Alice, but some cutesy American girl. Even Walt Disney, king of Americanisation, understood that Alice should be portrayed by a British actress. A contrived attempt at depicting Alice's nationality comes from a single framed picture of Queen Victoria hanging up on the wall in her house at the beginning.

In any case, the story progresses in the traditional manner: a girl named Alice follows a white rabbit down a mysterious hole and into a strange fantasyland home to the Mad Hatter, the Queen of Hearts and other funnies. "Through the Looking Glass" is also featured, linked to the Wonderland sections by an encounter with the Jabberwock. With practically all the characters invented by Carroll appearing, many of them often ignored by other filmmakers, you might be mistaken for thinking that, despite an American Alice, this adaptation is pretty faithful. This is hardly the case, however, as the tone of the original is alarmingly distorted.

Anybody who is familiar with Lewis Carroll's original books will remember "Alice in Wonderland" being anarchic, rarely sentimental in the traditional sense and above all means not didactic. Equally, the best adaptations, from the 1966 BBC film to theDisney classic, don't necessarily follow the original narrative completely; they instead re-interpret the material but stay true to the overall tone to achieve their own filmic equivalent. This version of "Alice in Wonderland", however, comes across more as a wannabe "Wizard of Oz" intent, and tones down the original's anarchy into a moralising story about Alice growing up so that she can have tea with the grown-ups. The characters, many of them sadly played by a good number of normally talented actors and actresses, will suddenly jump from acting somewhat akin to the grotesque verse-reciting loonies of Carroll into behaving like creations bent on teaching how Alice can mature. Moreover, they usually do so through horrible songs. The use of the Jabberwock as a personification of Alice's childhood fears is equally as stupid, as is the constant use of artificial thrill moments and cheesy science-fiction sound effects.

In fact, the production values on the whole are pretty dire. The sets seem lifeless and go overboard on fake plants. Most of the costumes look like they were hired from a fancy-dress shop, and, some of them look like they were made by six-year olds. For example, the Jabberwock looks like he's made of latex, and the oysters from "The Walrus and the Carpenter" look like people who got stuck in beach party props.

I understand that there are thousands of Americans out there who adore this version on the grounds of nostalgia, and by no means am I trying to wreck their childhood memories by trashing this film. However, as far as everyone else is concerned, I'd say that it's best worth avoiding. From every point of view, it's well and truly a bad, tacky, dated piece of fluff.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Classic for All Ages...
CHARLIE-898 March 1999
I first saw this ALICE IN WONDERLAND version when I was very young, in 1985. This is, to me, the definitive version. I was impressed with everything about it. As with all the ALICE IN WONDERLAND versions, this used a special guest cast (and an impressive one, at that). However, unlike other versions, the script was tailored to suit the guest stars, although they were perfect in their parts. Even the 1933 version had each character actor in Hollywood doing his act for the camera under the guise of the main story. The 1999 version was the same deal-all the stars doing their acts for the camera, with no regards to the story! But in this version, the actors played their roles as they were supposed to be played. Anyhow, the point is-this version really has stuck with me over the years. In 1994, I caught a re-run on television. I was thrilled to see it again. And none of the magic was gone-even 10 years after its initial broadcast! If you're looking for a version of the story to see, or just want to re-visit a special childhood memory, see this wonderful film.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not perfect but is still one of the better adaptations of Alice in Wonderland/Through the Looking Glass
TheLittleSongbird19 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Lewis Caroll's Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass are classic stories, oddball and fairly difficult to adapt but colourful and quite magical. As a child my favourite adaptations were this and the Disney film(the first one I saw), and re-watching this 2-part version again it still is a favourite. It's not perfect, not all the casting(a vast majority do) and songs(maligned but not that bad, more hit and miss) work, and while the faithfulness to the stories is very admirable and pays off very well often some scenes can drag as a result of being a little too faithful.

The sets are very colourful and designed lovingly, with a mix of eeriness when down the rabbit hole and sumptuous colour with the Flower Garden. If there was a choice between in the Alice in Wonderland half and the Through the Looking Glass half, marginal preferences would go to Through the Looking Glass, the visuals are more vivid and the characters a little kookier. Some of the more memorable performances of the whole adaptation are in Through the Looking Glass too, and the pacing is a little more secure. The costumes are rather weird- Cheshire Cat, Bill the Lizard, the Oysters and Dodo Bird were among the worst cases. But the ones for Alice, White Knight, Red Queen and Queen of Hearts are very appropriate and there is a soft spot for White Rabbit's too. The atmosphere is a great mix of eerie, oddball, funny, whimsical and colourful.

And the dialogue is clever, faithful in spirit to the story, some of it is literally lifted out of the pages of the book(s). You do wish that the Mock Turtle's melancholic poem was left intact though. In regard to the story, it is mostly very well-adapted though a bit draggy in spots. Of individual scenes, faring best are the Mad Hatter tea party, the train scene, the Old Father William musical number, the trial, Jam Tomorrow, Jam Yesterday, the touching We Are Dancing and Emotions numbers and of course the first appearance of the Jabberwocky(as a child that was terrifying, and even to a 21-year old it was scary). The ending is also a tear-jerker. Some scenes didn't fare so well, I don't remember a single thing about the scene with the Mouse, Dodo and Lory Bird, the Caterpillar scene would have fared better with the whole thing about the mushrooms(it did seem a little pointless), the Lion and the Unicron scene is awkwardly staged and Ernest Borgnine seemed ill at ease and the Walrus and the Carpenter number is fun but suffers from cheap costuming.

Which brings us onto the songs and casting. The background scoring and orchestrations are excellent and beautifully done, the Overtures over the opening credits show real promise and the creepiness and whimsy that pulsates the scoring throughout are used most effectively. The songs have been maligned, and in a way understandably. There are some good ones, though some suffer from being too brief or too samey. The best way to describe the songs are hit-and-miss. The hits were Old Father William(with choreography that seemed to be paying homage to Shirley Temple); There's No Way Home is a beautiful song and sung in a way that is a mix of vocally understated Frank Sinatra and Burl Ives; the very poignant We Ae Dancing with some of the best visuals of the adaptation; the intimidating Off With their Heads and the riotous Jam Tomorrow, Jam Yesterday. There are a few misses though, I Hate Dogs and Cats is probably the most forgettable song in all senses in the entire adaptation; There's Something to Say as well as being quite badly sung is no better; Laugh is rather dull despite Anthony Newley's singing; Lion and the Unicorn is a tad repetitive and Nonsense lacks irony, is not as poignant as Caroll's Mock Turtle poem in the book and is somewhat contradictory too.

Most of the acting is fine, but like with the songs some don't work. Shelley Winters, John Stamos and Donald O'Connor are wasted; Donna Mills is competent if unmemorable; Telly Salavas is too sympathetic for Cheshire Cat; Scott Biao performs with no real feeling or understanding of his few lines; Beau Bridges is a somewhat effeminate Unicorn; Ernest Borgnine looked uncomfortable as the Lion and Jonathan Winters is rather dull as Humpty Dumpty. Natalie Gregory however is a very endearing Alice, carrying the adaptation very well and charmingly and with spunk. The cast are like a Who's Who and it's really fun to spot. These were the performers that stood out. Sammy Davis Jnr plays Caterpillar with great personality and firmness and still is a great singer and dancer, the White Rabbit of Red Buttons is suitably jittery, Carol Channing is a riot as the White Queen, Robert Morley's King of Hearts is probably definitive, Lloyd Bridge's White Knight is chivalrous and meaningful, Jayne Meadows is a genuinely intimidating Queen of Hearts and Ann Jillian's Red Queen is performed with real gusto and menace(she also sings Emotions wonderfully).

And we also have Ringo Starr's melancholic Mock Turtle, Jack Warden's Wise Owl, Karl Malden's stuffy Walrus, Harvey Korman's imposing White King, Anthony Newley's very funny Mad Hatter, Arte Johnson's nervous Doormouse and Roddy McDowell's twitchy March Hare. In fact, while some like Patrick Duffy, Sally Struthers and Pat Morita are merely cameo appearances, the acting is good enough. Tweedledum and Tweedledee are great fun too, and isn't that Jabberwocky scary or what? Overall, along with Disney's it is one of the best adaptations of the book and is the most faithful to the book(s), Nick Willing's 1999 adaptation is faithful too. 8/10 Bethany Cox
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
See this for the CAST alone. Irwin Allen could bring a cast for sure
thebaldphoenix6 August 2021
1) I can't stand the songs (shame on Steve Allen for them. Irwin must have owed Steve a favor, as they aren't even passable for a NON-Disney musical).

2) The sets are just..."weird" (grass looks like a Putt Putt green...and a lot of set pieces look like they were retrieved from "Willy Wonka" 3) Natalie Gregory is a good Alice. Even though they played on the "cute factor" too much and she always has a look of "AWE...I am acting alongside Sally Struthers" in every scene.

BUT... WOW! What a cast! Try making this film today? And it is "Titanic Money" to produce. For sheer cast and set design alone.

But this was pure "Irwin Allen" here.

Some stars are billed and (literally) on screen for 1 minute. If you thought the cameos in George Stevens' "The Greatest Story Ever Told" were akin to "The Crucifixion On the Hollywood Squares/Match Game Hour"...then you GOTTA see this.

When ANN JILLIAN and BEAU BRIDGES (both at the HEIGHT of their careers) are "downbilled" to Jayne Meadows (30 years past her stardom)...then you know you got a CAST.

Irwin even seems to have "families of the stars" in this. (Like ALL the SAVALAS family. 2/3rds the BRIDGES family...the "All In the Family" FAMILY is represented (Sally Struthers, Sherman Hemsley, George Savalas, Sammy Davis Jr, all appeared on All In The Family) and of course "Irwin Allen's Road Company Family...including his wife Sheila, and his favorite "stuntman" Ernie "I fell from the ceiling/floor into the skylight in The Poseidon Adventure" Ernie Orsatti, to costumer Paul Zastupnevich, and all of his other extras that turned up in everything he did from "Land of the Giants to Beyond the Poseidon Adventure, etc"... This production is like a cavalcade of 50s and 60s and 70s that either "once worked with Irwin" or ALWAYS worked with Irwin, even if the script was a dud (see: Red Buttons and Pat Morita in When Time Ran Out, etc).

I kept waiting for OJ to show up and save Alice's car... or Maureen McGovern to sing a song or Leslie Nielsen to appear in a dramatic role. Oh well...those 3 I guess "Irwin couldn't get". But the REST of "The By-then Game Show Circuit of yesterday's stars" he did.

Wow.

Ya gotta see it to believe it.

It is weird and wonderful.

Pure Irwin Allen.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very Ambitious almost forgotten"Remake" of a Popular Fantasy Theme
mike481283 March 2019
The most remade tittle to date remains "A Christmas Carol" for all time. However "Alice" in it's various forms has been live action, animated, "DIsneyfied " and then there's the 2 Johnny Depp/ Tim Burton versions which are in a class by themselves. In 1933, Paramount made a star-studded version with W.C . Fields as Humpty Dumpty and then there is this 1985 version with dozens of cameos, Red Buttons as the White Rabbit and Sammy Davis Jr. as the caterpillar, to name a few. Even Sid Caesar! Perhaps best viewed on DVD as the whole thing is 3 hours long. The Jabberwocky is truly frightening to little children. Mostly pleasant songs by Steve Allen. Does it even still run on cable at all?
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Before LOTR, there was... Alice in Wonderland... on TV...
fullonrobotchubby17 August 2006
Thanks to talk show legend Steve Allen, who produced this incredibly faithful adaptation to the classic work of far out yet relevant children's fiction, you and your child (or little nephew or whatever) can know all of Lewis Carroll's book without sticking your noses in it. This miniseries was oozing with miscellaneous celebrity cameos as they portray all your favorite wacky-logic-minded characters and then some, more often than not, doing so in tights! If it has been your lifelong ambition to rub a ridiculous, almost unknown, embarrassing Beatles moment in the face of a Fab Four fan, you'll definitely find Ringo Starr as the Mock Turtle fit to your sick pleasure. Other celebrities who would've done anything for Steve or just owed him really big favors include Patrick Duffy as Goat, Pat Morita as Horse, Jonathan Winters as Humpty Dumpty, Beau Bridges as Unicorn, Sherman Helmsley as Mouse, Scott Baio as Pat the Guinea Pig (HA!), and Telly "Kojak" Savalas as the Chesire Cat.

I mostly remember this movie fondly for three reasons: 1.) Because of this movie, I, unlike most people my age, am aware of one of the funniest voiced celebrities ever in Hollywood, Carol Channing. She has a muddier and more slurred speech impediment than that drunk you know at that really sleazy bar (You know the one). 2.) In one of the most pimp casting choices ever, the Rat Pack's Sammy Davis, Jr. plays the Caterpillar. That's really all there is to say there. 3.) This, what I'm choosing as my favorite scene, is probably very cheap and dated now, but whattaya want? I was 3-5 years old! The character that scared excrement out of me every time I saw it was the big dark dragon-like Jabberwocky, and the scene toward the end when it demolishes a dining hall filled with the Wonderland citizens is forever deemed frightening in my mind. As far as adaptations that were true to the novel(s), this two-part movie was the closest to The Lord of the Rings we had back then. Isn't that sad?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Overall infinitely better than new Johnny Depp version!
remyarcher5 April 2010
Since the new beefed-up 3D Hollywood spectacle came out I had to go back and REMIND myself and others about this excellent made-for-TV version from 1985!

This version was a charming yet extravagant 4-hour tale told in 2 parts, 2-hr prime-time slots. The 1980s 'Alice' featured the ENTIRE Alice storyline - 'Wonderland' and 'Through the Looking Glass'(with the Jabberwocky). I emphasize this point because the 'alice' saga told in it's entirety is, as far as I'm concerned, the only way to tell the story. Far more enjoyable and entertaining! The cast consisted of a veritable Whos-Who of 80's actors, including jeff and beau Bridges and Sammy Davis Jr. (!).

As far as TV movies go, the production was very good. The ensemble cast, the costumes, the landscaping, everyone involved does an excellent job bringing to life EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER from Lewis Carrol's all time classic. IMO, the 80s version simply has more heart, more charm, whimsy, wit, and danger that the new-er version simply lacks. You could spend $15 for all the bloated CGI and 3D FX and over-the -top acting from Johnny Depp -OR- you can grab this from Netflix or Redbox (?) and introduce the young ones (and reacquaint yourself) to this superbly delightful, nostalgic treat! :-)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Fine Attempt...A Poor Result
jarobledo320 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
As a two-part miniseries with a length of about three hours, this adaptation of Lewis Carroll's beloved classics doesn't need to rush the story, allowing us to see pretty much every scene and character from the stories, including rarely seen ones like Pat, the Fawn, the Man in the Paper Suit, the Goat, the Gnat, Humpty Dumpty, the Horse, the Sheep, and the Owl. (Two of these characters, for some reason, swap the acts they appear in: the Owl is a character from the first book, but appears in the second act, and the Fawn is a character from the second book, but appears in the first.) Indeed, the only scene missing that I can think of is the Giant Puppy scene, which is somewhat disappointing, but excusable.

But with that being said, the rest of this movie really gets my nerves, especially the first act: for one thing, very few of Carroll's poems appear, and all the songs in this musical are "Americanized" and modern. This wouldn't be so bad if the film was meant to be a modern riff on the stories, like the Hanna-Barbera T.V. film, BUT IT ISN'T. It is very clear that this, like the original books, is meant to take place in Victorian Age England. But here's the thing: ALMOST NO ONE IN THIS FILM IS British! The songs are all obnoxious, as well as "Americanized," and have very little to do with Carroll's text, and, again, with the exception of "You Are Old, Father William," and "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Bat," none of the poems from the first book appear. The second act is just as guilty, but at least "The Walrus and the Carpenter" appears and is fairly enjoyable, and the ending tune is very sweet, and even a bit heartbreaking.

The casting is all over the place: In the first act, the Mad Hatter is played by Anthony Newley, whose rude and grumpy performance hardly makes him laughable (especially odd since his song is titled "Laugh"), and he comes off rather unlikeable. Jayne Meadows as the Queen of Hearts, as well as Martha Raye's Duchess, aren't regal, or even stuck-up...they're just straight up sadists whose accents make them sound like the Marry Murderesses from "Chicago." Scott Baio as Pat especially bothers me: he speaks Carroll's text word for word, but doesn't bother at even attempting an accent, and his flat, highly-rehearsed tone almost makes it sound like he has a speech impediment. The second act isn't much better: Carol Channing as the White Queen is particularly atrocious, and Jonathan Winters is exceptionally dull as Humpty Dumpty.

Now, there are some good performances: Robert Morley is my favorite King of Hearts, and Red Buttons and Roddy McDowall aren't half bad as the White Rabbit and the March Hare. Lloyd Bridges as the White Knight in the second act is bumbling and chivalrous at once, and there's a distinct lovability to him, and a twinkle in his eyes. Not bad at all. Ringo Starr's "storyteller" voice, which any fan of "Thomas the Tank Engine" is probably familiar with, works well in his performance as the Mock Turtle. And, of course, Natalie Gregory isn't terrible at all: she's very sweet, yet determined, and her age (nine years old) in this film makes her to closest actress, age wise, I believe, to play the coveted role of Alice.

Even though the performances are sometimes okay, the costumes rarely are: most of the costumes worn in this film come off as cheap-looking and seem to have very little basis in Tenniel's praised illustrations. Bill the Lizard looks like something out of "Farscape," while the Jabberwock, played by Tom McLoughlin, is menacing, but somehow manages to look like a bad Godzilla costume at comic-con, with wings.

With the mention of the Jabberwock, another problem comes to mind: the designs of the scenery, and the tone of the movie, which go hand in hand. The first act can't seem to make up its mind whether it's dark or light: the rabbit-hole is no longer the fanciful parachute ride from Carroll's story, masterfully captured in other stories, but a terrifying free fall, which ends in a dank tunnel that, for some reason, has lightning and thunder inside it. The Queen's sadism makes her especially horrific, Jayne Meadows' sick, twisted expressions of hate, rage, and insane glee making her moments particularly disturbing...the audience starts to wonder: is this a kid's film, or a prototype for "American McGee's Alice?" The second act seems to have made up its mind: it's a light take on "Alice," but with dark moments...namely, whenever the Jabberwocky appears. The film even involves death: even though the King still pardons people in the first act, as in the books, in the second act, Humpty Dumpty is pushed off the wall by the Jabberwock, and presumably never repaired, and the White Knight dies trying to defend Alice from the same frumnious beast. (Or seems to...he reappears at the very end of the movie, so I guess he was just knocked senseless.) My overall opinion: this miniseries is enjoyable for some, and one of the darkest takes on Carroll yet, despite occasional bouts of typical, childish whimsy, but it's not for me. Still, it does retain 99% of the characters/scenes from the books, so that's something, even if most of the songs and poems are omitted. A good try...but a bad execution.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a wonderful adaptation of a classic
eljaykay121929 December 2008
I saw this movie years ago with my then 5 year old and we loved it. I thought Natalie Gregory was wonderful as Alice. Usually Alice is played by girls who appear to be about 16 years old. Alice is supposed to be 7 and Natalie Gregory was 9 when this was filmed. The movie is in two parts with the second called "Alice Through the Looking Glass"

The supporting cast includes many old time actors such as Carol Channing, Steve Allen, Jayne Meadows, Ann Jillian, Martha Raye, Imogene Coca and more. It was a delight just to see them again. They were all marvelous in their roles, especially Ann Jillian as the Red Queen. I've always liked her in anything she's done.

The movie did veer from the book in several areas but most movies do. Most of the songs were good but one or two kind of dragged. However it really did not take away from the enjoyment of the movie. I loved the costumes.

Overall this is a fun movie to watch and a wonderful adaptation of the classic story. I highly recommend it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bluh!
vinciblestimps8 October 2008
There were some standout performances here, but mostly it was a showcase for a lot of washed-up old stars to try to restart their careers. Jean Svankmajer's version has the proper sense of confusion, fear, and also fun. I know most people think of Alice in Wonderland as a totally cheery Disney thing, but the books are not necessarily so. Not that I wasn't afraid... seeing Carol Channing always creeps me out. I still can't figure out why some really fine performers were in this. Robert Morley? Imogene Coca? Sid Caesar? They must have been very broke, I guess.

Anyway, I'd take many other versions over this one. I'm interested to see what the Tim Burton version will be like.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alice in Wonderland: The 1985 Made for TV Musical Spectacular
neonboy61921 August 2010
I LOVE the books Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and it's sequel Through the Looking Glass. I've read each one inside and out and have even studied The Annotated Alice which has notes in the margins so one could get a sense of the mayhem which isn't really mayhem once you understand where Lewis Carrol is coming from. For the die hard fan, one should check out the almost forgotten movie, Dreamchild. I say almost because, hey, I didn't forget it.

1985 saw the production of a big musical production of Alice in Wonderland, based off of both books, complete with acclaimed director Irwin Allen who was known for disaster movies. Poseidon Adventure being one of his most famous.

Along with a big name director came a big name cast that included Carol Channing, Imogene Coca, Ringo Starr, Sammy Davis Jr., Shelley Winters, John Stamos, Harvey Korman, and man this list could go on and on.

The TV Musical spanned two nights on CBS and was a HIT. Well, it was to me, heheh. I don't know the real stats.

Newcome Natalie Gregory played Alice and went on later to play Jenny in Disney's Oliver and Company. Like in that movie, she doesn't do her own singing here either.

Once in Wonderland, Alice meets the familiar faces and the casting goes from genius to insane.

A stand out would have to be Carol Channing as The White Queen who really makes this character her own. And she turns into a creepy lamb.

Shelley Winters in the small part of The Dodo Bird seems very wasted as they do nothing with her and she's a huge name. Come on, she's Shelley Winters, not someone with a small name. Even John Stamos had more screen time than her.

Martha Raye as The Duchess, Steve Lawrence as Tweedle Dumb and Eydie Gormé as Tweedle Dee look like they've been doing these parts of years now. It came so natural to them.

Pat Morita plays a horse.

Natalie Gregory really holds her own next to all these veterans.

The music is very energetic and some of the songs contain lyrics from Lewis Carrol's text.

That's one thing I LOVE about this production. A lot of Carrol's dialogue is contained which is what prompted me me to read the original books when I first saw this as a kid in the 80s. It was the first book I read. It's still my favorite.

If you want an old fashioned, fun, family musical, go check this out, and watch it like how Mark and I watch Bette Midler in Gypsy. Turn off all of the lights, sit in your living room as if you're in a theater and watch it and behave like how you would in a theater. Give yourself a 15 minute intermission even between acts. It's an experience let me to tell ya.

Go to My Movie Page:

http://neonboy619.blogspot.com
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Crazy Good Time Fun
crazedvampyress9 April 2003
I remember having this on tape as a child, recorded right off the tv when it originally aired. It was one of the most fascinating things I had ever seen. The all-star cast, originality and fun of the entire thing is portrayed by all. There are scenes included from the book that you dont see in any other version of the movie. It truly is a movie to remember.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed