Monkey Shines (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
95 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Fun and original horror.
el_nickster18 November 2002
This is not your run-of-the-mill slasher film. This is a well developed, well-paced suspense-type horror. If what you like it lots of blood and cheap scares punctuated by incidental music, then you should skip this film. If you like a horror involving a few good characters, and a really talented monkey, then take a look. The tension builds slowly. There are a lot of interesting characters, who are neither "good guys" nor "bad guys" (this includes the killer). The acting is not all that great, but the script is solid. That the monkey may be the best performer in the b=cast says more about the monkey than the human castmembers!
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Capuchin antics
ctomvelu122 August 2009
Offbeat horror film has a paraplegic being given a capuchin monkey named Ella as a companion. Only problem: the cute little monkey has been subjected to genetic experimentation, and has a mind of its its own. Pretty soon, the monkey is up to no good, and the paraplegic is becoming telepathically linked to the increasingly evil simian. George Rnmero made this little gem. The cast is largely unknown, although watch for a young Stanley Tucci as one of the paraplegic's surgeons and John Pankow as the paraplegic's buddy (and mad scientist). A weird little tale that takes its time to get to the nasty stuff, which is just fine with me as the killings are pretty routine.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overlooked among Romero's filmography.
Hey_Sweden24 October 2012
While this will likely never be considered one of filmmaker George Romero's best, it still represents a commendable effort in one of his rare forays into studio productions (in this case Orion). Scripted by Romero based on a novel by Michael Stewart, it tells the story of Allan Mann (handsome Jason Beghe), a law student who gets into a horrible accident that renders him a quadriplegic. He soon becomes despondent enough to attempt suicide, but soon he receives some temporary salvation in the form of Ella (Boo), a capuchin monkey who is trained to see to his needs. What he doesn't know is that his friend Geoffrey (John Pankow) has been playing mad scientist and injecting the cute lil' thing with human brain cells. Soon the bond between patient and helper becomes so strong that a mental connection is made, and Ella is physically acting out Allan's worst impulses. So what is he going to do about this little homicidal primate? Romero does a good job here at telling a fairly interesting story, although some viewers might be turned off at the lack of sympathetic characters. Most of them are flawed to some degree or another - creepy dean Burbage (Stephen Root), smarmy, incompetent doctor Wiseman (Stanley Tucci), fair-weather girlfriend Linda (Janine Turner), bitchy nurse Maryanne (Christine Forrest, a.k.a. Mrs. Romero) - and even a guy like Geoffrey, who initially just wants to help, has his problems as he's obsessed with his work. At least Allan has an appealing love interest played by Kate McNeil, whom horror fans will recognize as the lead in the slasher "The House on Sorority Row". The cast is pretty good overall; Joyce Van Patten plays the stereotypically smothering mother to good effect, and it's a treat to see character actors Root and Tucci near the beginnings of their careers, but the one performer the audience is likely to remember is Boo, who's adorable and very well trained; the animal action is first rate throughout (there's also a rather annoying bird on hand). The evolving relationship between Allan and Ella makes for a compelling hook, and it makes one appreciate the real-life efforts that people put into training service animals, and the animals themselves. The film is light on horror - most of the violence is implied - as Romero tends to go for a more psychological approach, and refrains from going for the gore. Overall, this is a decent flick, worth a look for genre fans who are interested in checking out Romero's non-zombie films. Seven out of 10.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underrated Romero film
cfisanick11 November 2001
This film has been described as a "horror film for people who don't like horror films." That's an apt description for this underrated psychological/supernatural thriller from Pittsburgh's master horror director, George A. Romero. To date, this is Romero's only studio film, and he had to make numerous compromises to the finished product. (The originally intended ending would have been a killer.) That said, the film still comes off as smart and sharp, with some very good casting. (John Pankow, recognizable from "Mad About You," is really excellent here, and there are nice early performances from Stephen Root, Stanley Tucci, and Janine Turner.) And check out the amazingly good editing in the last 10 minutes. Overall, while this is not first-tier Romero, it's a terrific little horror film.
40 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
not your typical horror flick
Sleel19 September 2003
If you're looking for body count, blood, or bogeymen, this film is not for you. It is more of a psychological thriller than a horror film, though it was billed as horror, likely because of the pseudo-science gimmick that provides the basis for the conflict in the plot.

While the film tends to wander a bit (i.e. a sub-plot involving the research head that gets dropped 3/4 of the way through) it stays fairly well focused on the main character and his problems. Aside from the lead, the most effective acting was done by the monkey(s), but the "real" actors do a pretty good job of carrying their own. It gives you a little insight into what it's like to be quadriplegic. For a late 80's movie, the style of filming was well done, there is very little cheese, and the special effects didn't overreach.

The premise seems a bit farfetched to our currently more sophisticated and informed sense of what's possible on the genetic engineering front. After all, this movie was made 15 years ago. If Romero had gone with either a supernatural cause or a plain animal jealousy angle, it might be less dated, but then again it might have been a little less believable to begin with.

Not very horrific, not startling or scary, but worth seeing if you don't mind a slightly slow-paced thriller. I gave it a higher than average score (6 out of 10) just because it didn't make me say "oh, please!" too many times unlike other movies from that time--particularly horror films--are prone to do. For example, the pivotal moment is fully supported by plausible input earlier in the film, it's not one of those miraculous developments pulled out of nowhere in the last few seconds before the climax.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Romero's curiosity piece
Leofwine_draca29 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
For his follow-up to DAY OF THE DEAD, George Romero chose this adaptation of a novel which manages to be scary thanks to the fact that it's an extremely realistic film. I don't think the scientific experiments on monkeys portrayed here are that far-fetched, do you? Of course, it wouldn't be a very good film if there weren't some fantastic moments, but for the most part this is an accurate and bleak tale. It's also a rather unpleasant one, albeit a film without the graphic gore which Romero usually delivers. Fans of his zombie trilogy will probably be disappointed with the total lack of blood and guts on here, as instead we get a slow-moving, character-focused drama which runs for nearly two hours. Yes, there are a number of deaths, but most of them are off screen. Tom Savini is credited with effects but seriously, they're few and far between.

What makes this film an interesting one for me is the unusual story that it has. Monkeys have always seemed to be quite evil creatures (check out OUTBREAK if you don't believe me) and this film dwells on an evil monkey, called Ella. The nature-running-amok theme is handled quite well, leading to a lot of creepy moments amid the more typical shocks. The acting can best be described as adequate, seeing as this is a late '80s movie... although I rather liked Jason Beghe's Jekyll/Hyde routine as the lead. But the real star of the show here is Ella, the monkey, who frequently does astonishing things. Watching a monkey running around with a straight razor and stabbing needles into people is something I found to be quite disturbing.

Although the film is gore-free, it's also not for the squeamish, as lots of nasty things happen to people involving needles and implied violence (especially when that needle gets too close to someone's ear, ugh!). The climax is quite good, highlighting the shortcomings of Beghe's disability as he desperately fights for control against the monkey which is now openly murdering all and sundry. And I defy you not to be shocked by the ending, which sees Beghe literally biting and ripping the monkey apart using only his teeth (as he's paralysed from the neck down). All this and there's time for a happy ending too. MONKEY SHINES is a film with a great idea behind it, only let down by the long running time and slow pace which frequently mean scenes verge on boredom. I would call it an interesting curiosity piece, but not one to go out of your way to see and not one you would want to watch again.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unsettling and nightmarish, a very underrated entry in Romero's resumé
DeuceWild_7725 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
George A. Romero's first big studio film (from Orion Pictures), shows a more restrained direction from the man who brought us such horror cult movies as "Night of the Living Dead" ('68) or "Day of the Dead" ('85), "Monkey Shines", based on the novel by Michael Stewart, is an atmospheric suspense / thriller flick, intriguing & captivating to follow, creatively directed & photographed with some interesting camera angles and well-staged scenes giving a sense of eerie and paranoia.

Jason Beghe (who looked a lot like Ed Harris) stars as Allan Mann, a handsome and healthy young athlete that becomes paralyzed after an accident, losing in the process his girlfriend Linda (Janine Turner) who can't handle Allan's new special condition. After a failed attempt to commit suicide, Allan is convinced by his best friend, Geoffrey (John Pankow), an unorthodox scientist, to adopt a monkey, named Ella, as a helper. This newly-acquired relationship gives Allan a new hope in life, both sharing everything together and facilitating his day-to-day, but soon their interaction will take an unexpected sinister turn...

Beghe and Pankow are both good (especially Pankow who looks and acts like he was sleepless for the entire shoot), but all the glory goes to the little monkey Boo playing Ella with special kudos for his personal trainer and the camera tricks & movie magic techniques which turned the innocent and cute animal into a vicious stalker turned sadistic killer on-screen. His close-ups and interaction with the human actors are amazing and a must-see.

Lower points are that the studio toned down the violence and cut some sub-plots' resolutions, trimming the picture in the cutting room floor and some scenes doesn't even make sense (suddenly the action jumps from Allan's home to a farm miles away without explanation).

Romero's fans felt disappointed when this movie came out, because of the lack of horror, gore and violence, but it shows another side of the Master of Horror, that he can handle storytelling and delivered a picture, that besides its flaws, denotes a deep respect for the quadriplegic (the sex scene between Allan and Melanie Parker, Ella's trainer, was meaningful and poignant) and at the same time, keeps the viewer glued to the screen involved in this unsettling, spine-chilling & nightmarish tale of a disturbed attraction...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Getting Down to (Monkey) Business
thesar-23 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
George A. Romero, best known for slowly – as in decades, but surely – as in don't call me Shirley, bringing social commentary and zombies into the light brings us the very, very 80s Monkey Shines.

Growing up, and as a grown up, I'm drawn to horror films. I remember this film dearly and loved it…back then, i.e. the late 1980s and early 1990s. Unfortunately, time has not been kind to the ole monkey named Ella (played wonderfully by…Boo.)

The movie wasn't bad, per se, it's just too long. Yeah, a complaint I have about a lot of movies, and for the most part, I can back it up. No different here.

We open with an unintentionally hilarious crash scene involving a running man, a barking dog and flying bricks. The athletic and college-student man, Allan (Jason Beghe who apparently is trying to channel Robert DeNiro) is a'joggin' when he's struck and is forced into a life of a quadriplegia. His mother, Dorothy (Joyce Van Patten, who, I'm sorry, comically looks like a man (SEE: Ms. Swan or Austin Powers) throughout) hires a straight-edged/comic-relief nurse (Christine Forrest) and best friend, Geoffrey (John Pankow) gets a human-brain-injected experimental monkey trained to take care of him.

Meanwhile his girlfriend, Linda (Janine Turner) leaves and Ella (the monkey) starts to win the heart of Allan while Allan woos the heart of the trainer, Melanie (Kate McNeil.) Meanwhile, the original girlfriend dates another and mother sells her business to help her son. Meanwhile, Geoffrey's experiments may/may not be producing results and he might lose funding from his boss, Dean (Stephen Root.) Meanwhile, Geoffrey's trying to contain the situation while taking too many drugs, himself. Meanwhile, Allan's growing angrier by the moment by show of cuss words. Meanwhile, Ella's kinda feeling left out.

Meanwhile, meanwhile, meanwhile. There's really just too much here. I wish it had just been a simple story of a 'Man and his Monkey,' albeit eeevil monkey. And why couldn't we have left it at that. Throw out the (sorry, spoiler) telekinesis segment.

I'm aware we have to use some suspension of disbelief, but we're dealing with a lab-rat monkey. That should've been enough to make us believe something's bad about to happen. When you throw in the 1980's answer to horror, or telekinesis – heck, even Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood jumped on that bandwagon two months prior in 1988, it lessened the tension/horror. For me, at least.

This is one of those movies you loved as a kid – if you were into these types of horror movies, and were a kid in the mid-to-late-1980s, that is – but doesn't really hold up today. It's fine and all, and slightly recommended to a new audience, but be forewarned: this is clearly an 80s project and certainly not timeless in any way.

I will end with some very positive observations: I loved every scene with Boo. But then again, I'm biased: I love monkeys in entertainment. They always make me laugh or curious to see what they'll do next. Also, it was fun to watch such a YOUNG Stanley Tucci, though he was kinda lost in the 150 subplots. In addition, I couldn't help but laugh at seeing Stephen Root in a serious role (yeah, I'm used to him in Office Space as the stapler-hugging Milton)…this is how most people probably would react when they see a grave Leslie Nielsen before Airplane! And finally, though it's a suspenseful movie – mostly in the closing that kinda of reminds you of Pet Semetary – it does contain one of the most eerie horror movie poster's I've seen.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Monkey Shines (1988)
SnakesOnAnAfricanPlain13 December 2011
George Romero does an excellent job of swapping Zombies for Monkeys. This film may sound ridiculous in the most preposterous way. But then again, we now live in a world of Snakes on a Plane and Burning Bright, so this is a little easier to swallow. In its genre, it is one of the best examples, and I'm not just talking about killer animals. I'm also referring to the stalker/obsessive partner/friend genre.

What Romero does brilliantly, is to take a number of characters and the audience on a journey of emotions and self discovery. For example, I started off wanting one of these monkeys. The relationship built up is a genuinely loving one. It's really cute, and this could easily be one of those lifetime inspirational movies. If the monkey wasn't a genetically modified, telepathic, homicidal, psycho monkey. The well trained monkey takes us from tragic victim of experiments, to a loving carer. We get a wonderful cleaning montage, as the monkey helps the friendship expands. The monkey's obsession grows steadily. It starts off with a few temper tantrums and escalates into bananas in the slippers. Soon bananas turn to murder. It's the evolution of all species.

None of this would work if it wasn't for a dramatic human connection. Beghe is a law student/athlete that is paralysed. He goes through acceptance, denial, frustration, which is understandable as his girlfriend leaves him for his doctor (a sleazy Tucci), he gets a patronizing nurse, and then his overbearing mother. It's great to see how the characters react to Beghe's quadriplegia, as it enforces Beghe's later anger. Beghe also does a terrific job of facial acting, which is most important as he can't use his body. In a single look he can convey the embarrassment of his mother having to wash him.

On the surface, this is a story of a monkey being a bitch to a cripple. But look deep down, REAAAAAAALLY deep, and you'll see a social commentary. For a long time, the monkey is the only one that treats Beghe as an equal. It doesn't throw money at his problem, try and cheer him up, nor can the monkey do everything for him.

Romero fills the film with dread, absurdity, and most of all a serious edge that clearly does the film justice. It's easy to mock this film. But the truth is, this could actually happen. Monkeys are creepy and untrustworthy.
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice try
shaun983 April 2002
"Monkey Shines" is an honorable effort that doesn't quite work. It deserves credit for originality, but falls short of the mark.

The concept is interesting, but the execution leaves much to be desired. A paralyzed man's life is made easier with the help of Ellie, a monkey trained to help disabled people get by with their daily lives. However, she used to be a lab animal who has had human brain cells injected in experiments. A bond forms between the two, and she acts out his violent desires.

The final act does a good job in delivering the goods, but the film takes too long to get going, diluting the overall effect. In fact, at times one almost forgets it's supposed to be a horror movie. When it gets going, it works, although the very ending is a bit much.

I'm still not sure the sci-fi gimmick was necessary. Surely they could have done pretty much the same things without it? Something more supernaturally orientated perhaps? Still, I admired Romero's willingness to take chances and try his hand at a more subdued thriller. Jason Beghe does a credible job in the role, and we are offered a rare glance at the frustrations of the disabled. A tighter film would have better achieved the director's goals.

**1/2 (out of ****)

An Orion Pictures release
19 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Another George Romero Disappointment
ccthemovieman-130 October 2006
For over an hour, this was fairly interesting but by the time the last 30-40 minutes had arrived, the unlikeable characters and general nature of the film made me not want to see much more. I did stick it out for the ending, climactic scenes but wouldn't watch this movie again. It just wasn't as good as I had hoped. For some reason, I had high expectations.

However, like other of George Romero's horror films, this has profane and very stupid dialog, attitudes, so-so special-effects and a Class B-feel to it. Why I expected better, I don't know. Romero almost always disappoints me.

The only redeeming quality of this film was seeing the beautiful face of Joyce VanPatten, a natural beauty if I ever saw one.
8 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of Romero's most underrated and finest horror films - "Monkey Shines"
dee.reid13 January 2009
It seems that every once and a while, a neat little horror film comes along that eschews genre conventions and is able to tap into a new vein to provide its scares. Writer-director George A. Romero, of "Night of the Living Dead" (1968) and "Dawn of the Dead" (1978) infamy, brings forth "Monkey Shines," an adaptation of the novel by Michael Stewart.

Romero has always been a director who goes for the throat in delivering the shocks in his horror pictures. But in the savage gore and mayhem, he has never lost sight of the human characters, their drama, and their plight. In "Monkey Shines," Romero seems to have been domesticated somewhat - dare I say, "tamed" - in that characters and drama are most essential to the core of the film, and that horror is really the last thing on his mind.

"Monkey Shines" begins with the Good Day Gone Bad, Really Bad: Allan Mann (Jason Beghe), is a highly physical law student who goes for a jog early one morning after spending the night with his girlfriend Linda (Janine Turner). To avoid a dog on the sidewalk, he unknowingly runs into the path of an oncoming truck. He wakes up several weeks later in the hospital, now a quadriplegic, paralyzed, unable to use his body anywhere below the neck.

Confined to a wheelchair he moves around by working a lever with his mouth and having to rely on live-in nurse Maryanne (Christine Forrest), his doting, overbearing mother Dorothy (Joyce Van Patten) and having to deal with his pompous surgeon Dr. Wiseman (Stanley Tucci) who begins having an affair with Linda, Allan gives up and tries to commit suicide. Luckily, Allan's mad-scientist friend Geoffrey (John Pankow) may have a solution: Ella, an extremely intelligent capuchin monkey who is being trained by animal specialist Melanie Parker (Kate McNiel) to be a sort of help-primate for paraplegics and quadriplegics, much like a seeing-eye dog is used for blind people.

At first, a great weight seems lifted off Allan's shoulders; Ella's the perfect helper - she can answer the phone, play cassette tapes in the radio, and even help Allan turn the pages of his books when he reads. She even raises her hand in class for her turn to be called on. A deep bond develops between the two that's right out of any made-for-TV movie about hope and determination to beat the odds. Of course, and this is where the horror elements begin to kick in, what Allan doesn't know is that Ella is really Geoffrey's guinea pig in an experiment to create super-intelligent primates: he's been secretly injecting her with human brain tissue, which explains her super-intelligence in helping to make Allan's life a little bit easier. Even more horrifically, Allan has been having incredibly realistic nightmares in which he has acquired a monkey's-eye view of the world, and Ella is subconsciously acting out his deeply-suppressed anger, frustration, hatred, and rage for those around him. And it soon begins a battle of wits to see who is really controlling who, which also sees if Charles Darwin was really right all those years ago.

"Monkey Shines" develops so nicely during its first hour that it's easy to forget that first and foremost, it's a horror film and not just any horror film, a George A. Romero-directed horror film. Romero shows remarkable restraint in combining both the human story with the horror story, that both elements are given enough screen time to thoroughly develop and not seem so tacked-on to each other. That atmosphere and tension of the film's horror-themed second half is pretty intense, even if things can be forgiven for the haunted house-style climax.

This is easily the best-acted film Romero has ever directed, though obviously it's not his best; that honor goes to "Dawn of the Dead." All of the characters turn in fine and realistic performances, including John Pankow as Allan's drug-addled mad-scientist friend who truly has his friend's best interests at heart, even if they're morally gray in the end. But there is one performer who is highly deserving of much praise, and that is Jason Beghe. Jason Beghe delivers a strong, controlled central performance that in my opinion, was criminally overlooked by a great many awards organizations. His performance is one of the most convincing and sympathetic portrayals of a physically handicapped protagonist I've ever seen in the movies. Essentially a prisoner in his own body, he hits every emotive note perfectly, and we believe and can see where and why his anger and rage at his condition is one of the most believable performances in the history of Romero's long and distinguished career as a filmmaker.

"Monkey Shines" is an overlooked career highlight from a highly distinguished director, George A. Romero. Even more so, Jason Beghe's criminally underrated performance makes the film even more worthy of more significant praise.

This is one horror film that isn't monkeying around in the end. It is really scary.

8/10
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A classic, no doubt!
paulclaassen20 May 2019
Aah, George A Romero - the master himself - does it again. This is a very stylish thriller and perfect study of how man's apparent progress goes horribly wrong.

The film captured my attention from the opening moment. Jason Beghe is perfectly cast in this demanding role. It was interesting (if somewhat creepy) to see how things started going wrong, very subtle at first, and how the situation declined to absolute chaos and mayhem. The romance interest felt very natural and enjoyable. Quite often the romance feels forced into a film; here it seemed inevitable given the circumstances.

This is a true classic!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Monkey Shines:An Experiment in Fear
Scarecrow-8828 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
A recent quadriplegic named Allan(Jason Beghe), and former track star, finds it hard coping with life having been confined to a wheelchair. His friend Geoffrey(John Pankow)is conducting experiments on a certain monkey named Ella which is through a hypodermic filled with a serum that derives from trimmings of frozen human brains in liquefied form. The experiments are about continuing the evolution of primate life into carrying more human characteristics. As Geoff tells his boss, Dr. Burbage(great character actor Stephen Root of OFFICE SPACE fame)Ella was already highly intelligent even before the experiments started, but something much more sinister develops when she becomes Allan's animal aide. Ella grows quite attached to Allan and vice versa, but something between them occurs that defies rational explanation..they are psychologically linked somehow meaning that when Ella goes out into the night, Allan sees through her eyes. It doesn't stop there..Allan feels what Ella feels and others around him see his behavioral changes which are unlike him such as outbursts of anger and profanity. Allan tries telling others about his link with Ella, but you can understand why they might be worried about his state of mind. But, soon Ella's aggressive nature turns violent and death to others that pose a threat either physically or emotionally(such as a girlfriend who leaves him after his accident for the doctor who performed an operation on his spine)occur.

Melanie(Kate McNeil)is a specialist in the training of monkeys in how they assist those in need of an aide. She is the one that was coerced by Geoff into training Ella to help Allan. Allan and Melanie, as the film continues, fall in love. Melanie will pose a direct threat to Ella as the monkey can not stand others coming between her and Allan. Dorothy(Joyce Van Patten)is Allan's mother, a woman who wishes to help Allan but is more bothersome and intrusive than she realizes. Christine Forrest, the director George Romero's wife, portrays Maryanne, a belligerent nurse who complains all the time in regards to how bothersome Allan and his monkey are towards making her life miserable. Maryanne has a parrot which flies into Allan's unprotected face too often and will suffer for it.

The longer the film continues, the more it induces eye-rolling..the premise is so outrageous and preposterous, it's hard not to chuckle. It is one of George's most Hollywood-ish films often allowing contrivances so that Allan will escape dangerous situations when Ella goes on violent. The whole "link" between man and primate thanks to an experimental concoction by Geoff is never fully explained satisfactorily leaving a gaping plot hole that is a wart to what the film is trying to accomplish. It's one thing to let a monkey get away with what Ella does, but another to ask us to believe that Allan feels and sees what she does. Thankfully Kate McNeil is a delightful, welcome presence in the film bringing some class to a rather mundane Romero effort. Disappointing film can not really build suspense because of the stupid story-line. If I wasn't such an Admirer of George's work, my rating would be lower.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Or you'll what?"
Backlash0073 March 2003
Warning: Spoilers
~Spoiler~

I'll have my deranged monkey kill your stupid bird. That's what. Monkey Shines flies low on the horror radar. It's a Romero film that people normally don't recognize. It's not as beloved as Night of the Living Dead or as socially aware as The Crazies, however, I'm going to give it some much deserved credit. I love this movie. Never have I wanted so many people to die so badly while watching a flick. I mean, these people get what's coming to them. The evil, lazy nurse, the jealous mother, the cheating ex-girlfriend, and the vindictive doctor. Take Kathy Bates from Misery and make her every character. You want to see this monkey go ape-sh*t and kill them. It's great. It's every young boy's dream to have a killer monkey and Monkey Shines really brings that to life. This idea has never quite been attempted this way and it's suspenseful as hell. I'd say it succeeded in doing what it tried to do. My only peve is that it introduces a few characters that clearly deserve to die, but don't (the nurse and Stephen Root). Other than that, it's a thoroughly enjoyable thriller. Monkey Shines, shine on.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting but this movie has problems
preppy-328 October 2005
Allan Mann (Jason Beghe) becomes paralyzed from the neck down after a car hits him. He falls into a deep depression until a scientist friend (John Pankow) gets him a trained monkey named Ella (Boo) to help him. Allan also begins to fall in love with Ella's trainer (Kate McNeil)...but Ella begins to get very attached to Allan--TOO attached.

This was supposed to be director/writer George Romero's comeback film. He said the studio loved it and was going to put a big promotional push behind it. But, for whatever reason, when this came out in the summer of 1988 the studio just dumped it. There was next to no ads for it or coming attractions. Romero remains bitter about it to this day. It's too bad this film was just ignored. It's no masterpiece but it isn't bad.

The movie does have problems--it's far too long (almost two hours), the ending goes on forever and some of the plot is really hard to believe (I thought the psychic link between Allan and Ella was really stupid). Also the POV by the monkey was annoying and overused and there's a REAL embarrassing sex scene between Beghe and McNeil. Still I do like this movie.

As I said it's too long but I was never really bored. Beghe is excellent in a very difficult role; Pankow nicely underplays the scientist and McNeil is fresh and appealing. Also Boo (who plays Ella) is a good "actor". I realize she was just trained for her role but the expressions on her face and body movement was incredible. The plot is also quite interesting--until the end when it just strains credibility.

So not a bad film or a good one but worth catching. I give it a 7.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A nice little Romero film
caspian197814 March 2001
This movie's not going to have a fan base larger than Night of the Living Dead or Dawn of the Dead, but it is another example of Romero's uniqueness as s film maker. An original story with an original cast, Romero adds to the horror genre by going somewhere where no other film maker has gone before. Monkey Shines cast includes Christine Forrest who shows her finest performance as the nurse. Worth checking out, so check it out.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An 80ie's Romero that isn't that bad at all!
MarkSchmitt112 September 2005
Well, I really can't understand why some people talk so bad about MONKEY SHINES - that's a real good one from Romero! Not only is the idea (the "evil" part of the human soul and behavior is the suppressed animal instinct that sometimes breaks through)in general fascinating - but it is also very well brought on the screen! Romero is often blamed for his unspectacular kind of filming, for his "low aesthetics" (especially his films of the 80ies) etc. but if you look a little deeper, you'll see how much sense his special kind of filming makes, for example as a means to show and develop characters. By the way: the beginning sequence is so great - in a way it shows the "poetry of a car accident" (does this sound perverted?). I appreciate the way of handling the topic of being handicapped - MONKEY SHINES is THE SEA IN ME (2004, directed by A. Amenabar) as a horror movie! The film not only works on a philosophical level but is also - of course it has to because it's a horror movie - very thrilling, even though Tom Savini doesn't go as far with his FX as in his splatter flicks. The only thing I didn't like was that the effect of the serum wasn't explained in a scientific way - this makes the story look like some old-fashioned mad-scientist-story from the early decades of the 20th century... And of course: you'll also find the characteristic Romero-sense for dark humor in this one, too.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
monkey see, monkey do
lee_eisenberg15 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
George Romero burst onto the scene with "Night of the Living Dead", which used the image of reanimated corpses terrorizing people to address the breakdown of the nuclear family (among other issues). He continued addressing political issues in later movies, included "Monkey Shines". This one uses the story of a monkey that gets too attached to its human to address the issue of animal welfare (look how they treat the animals in the lab).

It's not Romero's greatest movie but I still enjoyed it. Particularly neat were the POV scenes from the monkey whenever it's about to carry out one of the human's rage-induced wishes. A creepy movie, but one that I recommend.

Watch for a young Stanley Tucci as the doctor.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A genre cult classic which earns its title through solid character foundations and excellent pacing
ersinkdotcom25 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Monkey Shines" is a genre cult classic which earns its title through solid character foundations and excellent pacing.

After an accident leaves him paralyzed from the neck down, Allan Mann (Jason Beghe) is a bitter, angry, and vengeful man. His mother is overbearing. A once loyal girlfriend turns his back on him. The doctor he once trusted seems to have ulterior motives when it comes to his well-being and recovery. Everything changes when Allan is given a trained monkey suited to meet his every need. Even if that need possibly leads to tragic accidents which befall those the creature feels threatens its master.

"Monkey Shines" is rated R for sex and nudity, violence and gore, profanity, alcohol and smoking, and frightening and intense situations. The "F" bomb is dropped quite frequently throughout the movie. There's a rather detailed sex scene, although I don't recall any nudity. Watching a monkey maim and kill people could be pretty traumatic for younger (and even some older) viewers I would imagine.

I found "Monkey Shines" to be an entertaining film which establishes its different characters rather quickly without sacrificing substance for scares or gore. It's a good balance of all the necessary ingredients for a rich psychological thriller.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Can you really blame the guy?
Aaron137531 March 2003
Warning: Spoilers
In this one this guy gets disabled and can no longer look after himself, as he cannot move anything from the neck down. A person is hired to look after him. His friend though decides to give him a monkey he is experimenting on to help his friend out. Unfortunately, this monkey begins to form some sort of link between itself and the disabled man and performs some of the man's dark thoughts. The monkey kills off the bird of the caretaker, as this bird actually attacks the man, the monkey also goes after his former lover and the guy she had an affair on. This guy is actually the one who performed the surgery on the guy. The caretaker moves out after her bird is killed, so the guys mom moves in to take care of her son and treat him like a child. You can really sympathize with the guy as his frustration mounts, as it seems people are discouraging him from ever moving again even though there is a slim possibility he can regain his former abilities. This movie also shows how, even though someone may be disabled and in need of assistance that they shouldn't be treated like a child. All in all an OK flick with a rather good ending.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad Monkey, Bad!
Trepanist5 February 2008
I find it interesting that we've not heard anything from the top billed actors in this film, but Stephan Root, Janine Turner and Stanley Tucci all have gone on to successful movie careers.

Anyway, back to the movie. It reeks of a made for TV special and the acting is pretty awful. It's fun to watch with a date or friends; too see who and how the little primate will do in next. There is a truly scary scene in which the nurse, who at first finds a banana peel in her slipper next finds her dead pet bird. But these chilling moments are few. And that's too bad, because what this movies really need was more development of the monkey's subtle human qualities of vengeance.

An incredibly bad movie that had potential; I liked the premise a lot. Hopefully a better treatment will come out in the future.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not your run of the mill horror
UniqueParticle7 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Unexpectedly intense classic, a unique abnormal experience! It's about a man who gets in a severe injury and makes friends with a monkey that even helps him until the monkey gets super vicious/evil. Unlike most George A. Romero films, very refreshing and enjoyable to see how things play out.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Monkey See, Monkey Do!"
gwnightscream10 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Jason Beghe, John Pankow, Kate McNeil and Joyce Van Patten star in George Romero's 1988 sci-fi/horror film based on the novel. This focuses on former athlete, Allan (Beghe) who gets paralyzed in an auto accident. Soon, his scientist friend, Geoffrey (Pankow) decides to give him an experimental monkey, Ella to help him recover. Allan and Ella bond immediately, but Allan starts having a telepathic link with her causing behavioral changes and Ella becomes dangerous. McNeil (The House on Sorority Row) plays Melanie, an animal specialist who finds romance with Allan and Van Patten plays Allan's overbearing mother, Dorothy. This is a pretty good 80's sci-fi/horror flick with a decent cast and great make-up effects by Tom Savini as usual. I recommend this.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cute Killer Monkey
view_and_review26 September 2019
A really athletic dude named Allan (Jason Beghe) was hit by a pick-up and paralyzed. Not that the pick-up truck did him any favors, but the guy was running with ankle weights and a backpack full of bricks--it was only a matter of time before his knees would've been destroyed by that abuse. To help him out he was offered a trained monkey, Ella.

Ella could do simple tasks that were immeasurably helpful like fetch a book, give him snacks, play a cassette tape, etc. Ella was a bit enhanced though. This poor little gal, who never asked to be a guinea pig, was experimented on with some psychotropic drug. It was supposed to make her more intelligent, but it did a lot more than that.

I'm not sure which was the first movie to experiment with making a smarter animal that went horribly wrong (see Deep Blue Sea and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes), but this one is the earliest one I know of.

Ella, as a result of the experimental drug, had a psychic connection with Allan. Even more than that, Ella's very presence made Allan hostile and angry towards everyone and Ella, aiming to please her master, would act upon Allan's anger. She became a killer monkey.

Have you ever seen the YouTube clip of the trunk monkey? Well, Ella was that and then some. She was a little thing, like the size of a spider monkey, so she had to be cunning, but she got the job done. And what do we do when an animal is dangerous? We kill it. Forget about the fact that she was made into a killer by some desperate mad scientist, the bottom line is that she was now a killer and had to be killed herself.

It is a sad movie. She was so adorable. She only wanted to please Allan. This is not me being a radical PETA member, this was a really cute monkey. I wish I had a little monkey like her. Minus the killing. At the very least she's a good ice breaker and conversation starter.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed