Farewell My Concubine (1993) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
137 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A fine movie, truly an epic.
Bobak!27 May 1999
I finally got a chance to see "Farewell my Concubine." I'd been anxious to see it since its initial release in 1993. It surprised me in its depth and technical skill.

Three points make this film outstanding. The first is the technical skill of the director and the luscious taste of the director of photography. The entire film is a feast for the eyes, taking full advantage of elaborate costumes and exotic locations. The second strength is in the actual storytelling. The plot is a fascinating tragedy, it feels almost Shakespearean. The acting is nothing short of incredible. Some of China's finest actors demonstrate their ability to carry a story that covers 52 years. Normally, these two strengths alone would be reason enough to see a film, but "Farewell my Concubine" succeeds in satisfying one more category (the bain of any epic): historical accuracy.

"Farewell my Concubine" is exceptionally accurate in portraying the monumental changes that were sweeping China at the time. The film doesn't just treat these events as background events, but drags them right into the plot and pins the characters into their surroundings. This is interesting when you consider that the story takes place in the Peking Opera, not the most likely place for these events to have effect. Instead, as we see the new China emerge, we watch these vestiges of old society fall, and the work of all involved make this transition an achievement to behold. The power of this film was not missed by Chinese censors who banned, removed, and then banned the film again several times over -debating whether or not its artistic brilliance was worth subversive portrayals of suicide and homosexuality. Unlike "The Last Emperor," this film was made by Chinese film makers and is in tune with its subject. I recommend this film highly!

As one last note, the version I saw was a DVD containing the original 170 minute version of the film, in its wide-screen splendor. From what I understand, the shorter versions released internationally deleted and shortened some opera scenes for fear that they would be lost on Western audiences. Having no prior experience with any Peking Opera, I found the scenes fascinating and integral to appreciating the entire story. Spend the extra time if you can.
126 out of 145 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very lovely film...
Nazi_Fighter_David18 May 2008
The film paints the story of two actors, from their first encounter at school in the Twenties through their success as stars of the Peking Opera, difficulties during the Japanese occupation, the Communist takeover in 1949 and the traumas of the Cultural Revolution in the Sixties…

For the so-called Fifth Generation of Chinese filmmakers, the film touches new ground on two fronts… In the first place, though it does not avoid from acknowledging the sufferings under the old regime, it takes an embittered view of Communist society and of the Cultural Revolution specifically…

The two friends, Xiaolou and Dieyi, adopt a young man, Xiao Si, who becomes one of the Red Guards and quickly informs the political sins of his benefactors…

Second the film is a love story of a rare kind… Dieyi is a homosexual and suffers rejection when Xiaolou begins an affair with Juxian (Gong Li), a gorgeous prostitute… The personal conflict of each character is the heart of this exceptional movie
58 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
By far. The very best of Chinese film
Demoor2 December 2010
This is, without the doubt, the very best of Chinese film making, acting and story telling. I didn't watch this movie only until last year, and there are no words were powerful enough to express my feelings. The acting were flawless, and the emotion in the entire film were so real and strong, you'll feel so attached the whole time. Leslie is the one and only actor who can fully deliver the role of ChengDieYi, and his work in this film is remarkable. A true milestone performance of his career and film acting. The story, The history, The culture, The acting!!!

A must see film!!!
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Incredible Film. Don't skip it because it's foreign!
Pooty-T20 January 1999
I have seen this movie only once but it left an indelible impression on both me and my wife. It is a beautiful film with gorgeous photography, invisible direction and fantastic acting. What struck us most about this film was how many levels it had. It was a story about politics, love, life, faith, all rolled into one exceptional package. Yet none of these messages are hammered into you. They just flow over you in well-timed waves. Many of these Chinese movies are so interesting because of their unique perspective. It's wonderful to immerse yourself in a great film from a different culture. The many points of beauty in this movie are subtle, delicate and drenched in China's magnificent history. You have to experience it for yourself to understand, and once you do you'll fall in love with the world of Chinese cinema.
34 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A powerful film (and I do not give that out lightly)
SilencioDrive16 August 2003
I've seen this movie more times than I can count and I cry every time. I first saw it in the theater in 1993 and I was rooting for it to win Best Foreign Film Oscar, but it lost to the far inferior Belle Epoque (Spain). As to the person who wrote that this film made Cheng Dieyi seem like he was made to be gay because of abuse, I think you need to take another look. To my mind, Dieyi seemed to be infatuated with Shitzou as soon as he got there. However you look at it, this is a film that has great performances all around. I especially loved Leslie Cheung as the adult Cheng Dieyi (requiem eternem Leslie, 1956-2003), not to mention Gong Li. An excellent film, but be forewarned: it's almost three hours long. 10/10
83 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Tremendous Story on Many Levels
bluzman19 May 2002
As an WASP American married a lady from Mainland China, I have a great interest in and curiosity about China. My wife's mother and father actually saw these men perform. I have discussed this movie with many Chinese friends, most of whom saw it before coming to this country. Some of them knew the story from real life as well as the movie. They are quick to point out the accuracy of the story in its detailing of Chinese history from the end of the last dynasty until its end during the Cultural Revolution. They also claim that the major happenings in the movie are real events, not the norm for most of Hollywood's "real life" stories. One point of conjecture in the movie is the sexually of Dieyi. It is presumed he is/becomes a homosexual. However, from what I have learned about the Peking/BeiJing Opera through reading and discussions, it is more likely that Dieyi was virtually unaware of his own sexuality. As opposed to being a hetero or homosexual, he was asexual in a way like it had be surgically removed from his being. It had been taken from him through the rigors of his training and years of performance. His love for Xiaolou is powerful, maybe even surpassing ordinary man/woman love, but platonic in as much as his mind is devoid of its sexuality. He suffers the same jealous anger and sense of betrayal as might be found when a wife discovers the cheatings of her husband, and reacts, unfortunately, accordingly (Heroin). His real, enduring love is performing. It is the one constant that has seen him through. He throws himself into it, being willing to perform for anyone, even as it drives the story to the end. The end of the movie is not satisfying to everyone. It was not a Hollywood ending. However, it was reality.
99 out of 128 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Opening and closing scenes
mac_alain17 February 2005
quote by tedg: "Opening scenes are seductions, promises. They transport one to the world of the story and establish who you as viewer can expect to be. Done right, they are an art to themselves. This film's opening is among the best I've seen, establishing the world of performance: politics as theater and love as both. It lets you know the perspective is centered on a stylized stage and concerns loss, sexually ambiguous brotherhood and betrayal. All in a couple minutes."

Well put. Also noteworthy is that at the end of the movie the opening scene is being mirrored (the two actors on stage being lit by a spot light), the film thus coming full circle. Quite ingenious.

What is good about the movie is that we (Westerners that is) learn a lot about recent Chinese history, which cannot be a bad thing considering the direction in which China is heading.

Oh, and Leslie Cheung's - may he rest in peace - performance is simply outstanding. But then, the acting is first rate all round.

This is one hell of a movie.

And, off topic, I have once again realised that the problem with sub-titled films is that one misses so much/too much of the actual acting, making it really necessary to view movies twice. Still, (a lot) better than viewing dubbed films though.
43 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I'll not make a film better than this.
pete-9514 February 1999
I've always boasted that I could make a better film about China, about the Cultural Revolution in particular, until I saw this film. It triggered an out-burst of many of my emotions I hadn't had since I left China. In the movie, as the events developed, the tragedy, caused by the human feelings : love, hate, jealousy, and guilt under the social unrests, came so naturally to me. It is a movie which should not be missed.
75 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A lavish, opulent, and intense film; bring your lunch
DennisLittrell1 January 2000
As far as story and content goes this owes more than a little to The Last Emperor (1987), which is not surprising since Director Kaige Chen was a member of the cast of that film and no doubt was influenced by its success. But stylistically, and especially as the film was directed and cut, "Farewell, My Concubine" is original and stands alone. If The Last Emperor was a Western movie about the Chinese political experience in the Twentieth Century, then Farewell, My Concubine is a Chinese movie, influenced by the West, about that same experience. While the former focused on the emperor and those around him, "Farewell..." focuses on two actors of the Beijing opera. Admittedly, "Farewell..." is long (I saw the 157-minute version) and sometimes strays from it intent, but gains and maintains power and keeps our interest mainly because everything is presented in a starkly-lit, intensely focused manner. The epic-like story itself is good if a little pedestrian at times. The lavish and stunning sets in opulent color and design, are just fascinating to view. Everything from the extras in the crowds to the porcelain for tea is carefully chosen and presented. Particularly striking are the traditional costumes and makeup, shown to advantage through the fine camera work. But what makes the film is the glimpse we get of the world of the Beijing opera and its traditions. From the Dickensian boy's school for the actors to the intrigues with patrons and the political powers that be, there's the sense of a world beyond our experience. The acting was also excellent. The beautiful Gong Li, who played Duan's wife was captivating as she displayed a wide range of emotion. Leslie Cheung as Dieyi, "the concubine," and Fengyi Zhang as Duan, "the king," were also excellent. The boys who played the actors as children, especially the actor who played Douzi, were first rate.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best Chinese movie ever
joseph-9046021 January 2020
I don't know y'all but to everyone growing up in Taiwan or hongkong or China this is like The Godfather that kind of classic. This movie deserve at least a 9.0 for sure. Western people can not really understand this. But we Chinese people feel it with our heart.such an heartbreak and terrific film.best movie I've ever seen
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good film
AKS-613 February 2000
"Farewell My Concubine" is a very good film. The story is interesting and upsetting. The acting is exceptional (Li Gong is fantastic) and everything from cinematography to the script is brilliant. It's a bit too long, if you ask me, but the film is, nevertheless, interesting until the end.

This is only the second Chinese film I have seen, but it is almost as good as the absolute masterpiece "Raise the Red Lantern" (Li Gong is in that film as well). Recommended. (7/10)
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
VISUAL, ABSORBING MASTERPIECE
Mitch-3814 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS* Stimulating, engrossing and outright fascinating portrait of two orphans, who stay friends throughout sixty years or better, in twentieth century China. They are entered in the Peking Opera Academy, where they endure the arduous rigors of training. In their childhoods, is where they master the defining roles they are destined to portray all their lives.

FAREWELL MY CONCUBINE is at times claustrophobic, subtly depressing, but never dull. It is always intriguing. The film penetrates all cultural barriers, allowing the viewer to become involved in the story. Gritty scenery and atmosphere, strong performances (Leslie Cheung is stunning in his portrayal) and brutal reality are this film's hallmarks.

An excellent foray into what telling a story, via a motion picture, is all about. Excellent and heartily recommended.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Powerful story, but the director doesn't deliver.
whyhow1116 July 2010
I'm not a fan of Chen Kaige. Most of his films are either too melodramatic or big on concept but fail to deliver on the human level. He knows his craft, is hugely ambitious, but there is something missing in his soul.

It would help the viewers to know something about the historic background of this film. Google Chu-Han Contention, Xiang Yu (the king/hegemon), Battle of Gaixia. May help to know a bit about the more recent events in modern Chinese history such as the Cultural Revolution too, but that's not at the heart of the story.

The best developed character is of course Dieyi. Based on the traditional Chinese role of the tragic heroine, with the additional complexity of gender confusion. not very appealing, despite hitting all right notes of the traditional femininity, unless you got yellow fever. Xiaolou, the king who is not really a king, like Xiang Yu, strong but unable to control his fate. the easiest character to relate to. Juxian is not well developed, the king's horse? Yuang is potentially interesting character, well acted, but again not developed enough.

It is Chen Kaige's best movie I've watched. Worth watching, but ultimately not as satisfying as the more straight-forward and honest movie by other fifth generation Chinese directors. I would watch Hong gao liang over this any day.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Birdcage meets Fatal Attraction, with a gigantic helping of Sado-Masochism
ebossert26 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
As I write this review, there are 50 comments on IMDb – 48 of which rate this film a 7/10 or higher. Needless to say, a contrary opinion is desperately needed, and I will now provide it.

Take the costume designers from The Birdcage and the fanatical sexual obsessions from Fatal Attraction. Then add a gigantic helping of Sado-Masochism, and you'll get something remarkably similar to Farewell My Concubine. Taking this into consideration, the praise this film has garnered is almost inexplicable.

The first 50 minutes focus solely on the child abuse of the two lead characters. None of the characters are remotely likable because everyone acts as if they are certifiably insane while on PCP. Children escape their abusers, only to then return and actually beg to be beaten. Boys lick each other's flesh wounds while dressed in drag, or simply pee on each other's heads. Old men (when they're not asking stupid questions like, "What year is this?") get their kicks off of beating little children or making them pee into little glass bowls. How the hell could anyone consider this tripe entertaining? Thankfully, the film calms down for the final 120 minutes (and yes, it lasts almost three excruciatingly long hours), when a woman obstructs the friendship of the two leads. But even during the better portions of the film, the negatives still heavily outweigh any positives:

(1) The sadomasochistic obsession of all of the characters rears its ugly little head on multiple occasions. The two lead characters welcome their despotism with near fanatical graciousness, and structure their entire existence to facilitate this repressiveness. This film almost glorifies abuse.

(2) The death of the troupe master is unintentionally hilarious.

(3) The entire subplot of the conflict with the Japanese practically derailed the main plot of the story.

(4) The subplot of Gong Li's miscarriage was played down too much, when it could have contributed greatly. It seemed to have little to no effect on the primary storyline.

(5) The film fails miserably to earn the viewer's sympathy for the characters. The lead character renounces his love for Gong Li. Gong Li kills herself. The film then fast forwards 11 years to imply that one of the male leads kills himself. It all seemed so ad hoc and cheap to me – a way of cheaply earning sympathy at the very end of the film.

Farewell My Concubine was a major disappointment. I was expecting it to rank amongst some of the newer classics (The Road Home, Happy Times, In the Mood for Love, Shanghai Triad, Kikujiro, 2046, Dolls, Sonatine, Eat Drink Man Woman, Hana Bi, The Isle, Chungking Express, etc.). Unfortunately, it simply fails to entertain in any significant way. The first 50 minutes annoyed me; the final 120 bored me.

So basically, if you enjoy watching men dressed in drag while singing at glass-shattering pitches that must have required the inhaling of a blimp full of helium, then Farewell My Concubine might be for you. Otherwise, stay far away from this one.

Update: Just saw Yimou Zhang's "Raise the Red Lantern", which blows this movie away on every level. See that one. Forget about this tripe.
20 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the grandest epics of our time...
sarahgoh22 March 2000
A masterpiece in every sense of the word, Chen Kaige's breath-stealing parable of China's multi-layered political revolution, is centred on two men. Chen presents us with an absorbing story of a 52 year-old relationship between two opera actors mounted upon an impossibly large canvas. But without sacrificing any intricate plot development or smudging over any delicate complexity in the relationship.

Considered by many to be one of the greatest epics of all time, this film rightly established Chen's reputation as one of the most brilliant narrative and artistic directors of our time, along with other such contemporary auteurs as Kieslowski, Bertolucci and Kurosawa.

You can not call yourself a film-buff if you haven't seen this movie. And film-students: you can witness the true art of filmmaking and story telling through the skilled hands of Chen Kaige's Farewell My Concubine.
52 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The greatest film of all time?
Auselan22 August 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Like the French, the Chinese seem to produce nothing but incredible movies; movies that are so culturally rich and psychologically grounded that they are almost like novels. Farewell My Concubine is about the cultural revolution in China; with the relationship between two heroes and the heroine being a microcosm of this movement.

Dieyi, who plays Concubine Yu to Xiaolou's king, represents the old society of corrupt, but noble, decadence. Warped by abuse and betrayal, victimisation literally turns him in on himself, until he becomes homosexual in so many ways. The grim passivity, of which his homosexuality is only one facet, is bitter and snide on the one hand, but stoical and brave on the other. The suffering and ugliness that lies behind his elegant pristine act (as Concubine Yu) is like the hardship, toil and exploitation that was behind the old society (with its palaces and silk clothes created by the tired hands of the proletariat). Through combining both the ugliness and the beauty of the old society in one character, the film is able to justify it: the proletariat and the nobility are one, their suffering is one, and their triumph is one. This is forcefully iterated in the scene where communist pupils attack Dieyi's aesthetic preference for noble ambience on stage (beautiful backdrops portraying aristocratic gardens rather than proletariat metal pylons). We feel the injustice and hypocrisy of their ideology, for Dieyi is tougher than any of them; he has suffered and toiled harder than the most exploited slave in the history of mankind.

Where Xiaolou represents practical masculine reality, Dieyi represents art: he talks with a distanced air of finality and confuses the opera with everyday life. This is, for the most part, rooted in psychological realism. When Dieyi is beaten he refuses to cry because his artistic temperament detaches him from rationality and gives him a tragic-heroic identity which sustains him: to cry would be death for him. Xiaolou, on the other hand, chooses to grapple with reality and play up to the masters who beat him; he takes the lashings with comic defiance and exaggerated pleas for relief. The film only goes wrong when it becomes Dieyi's mouthpiece, condemning Xiaolou for betraying him. In the world of the film, it is no more fair to say that Dieyi is braver than Xiaolou than to say that Xiaolou survives where Dieyi perishes: within their own vital spheres, both prevail.

Xiaolou's wife, is a beautiful subtle portrayal of womanhood. From her beginnings as a whore (physically and emotionally) she grows in stature until she chrysalises into the film's most worthy character. The compassion and fortitude with which she tolerates her husband's operatic partnership with Dieyi, even when it is responsible for the loss of her unborn child, is heroic in a womanly sense (a kind of heroism rarely acknowledged in literature or film). Her pity for Dieyi outweighs her jealousy: she nurses him out of his heroin addiction as if she were his mother (his mother was, significantly, a prostitute from the same whorehouse as she). However, at the end, when the two of them have both been denounced by Xiaolou, the characterisation slips into sentimentality: instead of bearing Xiaolou's callousness with contempt (as she does when he hits her earlier) she gives up on life.

Like many of the greatest works of art, this film is flawed and it is the ending which reveals and embodies this flaw: sentimentality.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A flawed masterpiece
p-seed-889-1884698 August 2014
I have had a great deal of trouble writing this review. Every time I make a start I can find nothing to get my teeth into and no coherent thread to interconnect my thoughts. While there are many potential sub-topics they all seem to stand in isolation. While this may simply be a reflection of my inability to string two sentences together I think in this case it pretty accurately summarizes the issues I have with this movie.

It is difficult to figure out what this movie is and if asked to summarise it in 25 words or less I would be flummoxed. Is it a Chinese history movie? An opera movie? A Chinese culture lesson? A love story? A story of betrayal? A story of pseudo or actual homosexuality? It is snippets of all of these and probably more, but it does not really do justice to any of them. Basically it suffers from multiple personality disorder and unfortunately we don't get enough time with any of them to relate to any of them. Yes, the history and cultural aspects are interesting in their way but don't really add anything to our understanding of the horrors of the Japanese invasion of China, the Nationalist/Communist struggle, the early Communist era and the later Cultural Revolution. Yes, it is a "love story" between the two actors who play the King and the Concubine, but we never experience any passion or come anywhere close to connecting to either of these characters to really care. The "King" character in particular is very undeveloped, little more than a cardboard cut-out who happens to be the object of the "Concubine's" unrequited love. The character played by Gong Li is also skin deep and we never really care about her or her relationship with the "King" actor – indeed the random and non-sensical way in which these two characters become engaged simply nukes any credibility that this relationship might have had, and by extension destroys the credibility of any other relationship on the movie, most importantly the pivotal one between the "King" and the "Concubine". The betrayal, which I gather meant something personal to the director, is dealt with too curtly to have any effect at all. The character of the "son", raised from an abandoned baby, is totally illogical and we simply don't get to know him well enough to care about him or understand why he would possibly want to betray his adoptive parents. It all just seems facile and silly. We never really understand (or at least, I don't) the "homosexual" overtones of the "Concubine". Was he simply beaten into a form of insanity in which he thinks he is always in character as a woman? Is he actually a homosexual? His "king" friend seems to be too thick to understand the "Concubine's" feelings for him and this to me trivializes the whole "affair". And to be honest, none of the characters come across as being particularly nice, in fact the Concubine character comes across more as a petty, whinny, jealous, lightweight flake than a tragic figure we could weep for.

OK, just because a film is not perfect doesn't mean you should not watch it. "Farewell My Concubine" is one of those films which is a "must see" despite its failings. If it falters as an emotionally satisfying and coherent movie it is a stunning technical tour de force and a masterpiece of its kind. Just to have made a movie of this scope is an achievement, almost to the point that its success is secondary, crazy as that may sound. It is a movie of such breadth that it is impossible to take in completely in one sitting, and that is perhaps the ultimate test – you know you need to see it again to understand it but can you care enough about it to make that effort? But – trust me - you need to see this movie – your education as a movie goer is incomplete unless you do. You will enjoy it, and you will be moved to have an opinion, one way or the other.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'Gone With the Wind' of China
ynotmd8 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
An apt functional definition of art is 'a stylistic representation of an artist's views through a given medium.' A style can take many forms, such as realism or surrealism, but what all styles hold in common is the conveyance of a message. Films like "Farewell my Concubine" are political in nature, expounding a philosophy that "the personal is political ." This movie is a high-style epic drama, which is why some critics call it "whiney " or "soapy ." Although there are melodramatic elements in the film, it should not be taken at face value, but instead as representational of Chen Kaige's deep-seated feelings about the status of the Chinese people. What appears to be a story of love and betrayal amongst tumultuous political change is in fact a criticism of the dissociation between Chinese politics and Chinese culture, causing major problems throughout an individual's life.

The dichotomy between culture and politics and the tension therein caused, is shown by three broad elements: Peking Opera representing culture, extraneous political forces, and people living in between art and politics. By examining how all three elements interact we will see the director's political views and how the personal lives of characters figuratively represent the dilemma of the Chinese people.

What lies between culture and politics is the individual. The individual, like a canvas is painted by environmental factors. For Douzi and Shitou, the principle characters, their first impression in the film is the Peking opera. The Peking Opera as an environmental factor represents culture. As the troupe leader says while the children are going through difficult training, 'the Opera is what makes us human, without it we are but animals.' As people, our culture is our humanity . Food, art, clothing, religion, and ceremony culminate to create 'culture.' Without it, we could scarcely define ourselves apart from animals. The Peking Opera represents Chinese culture, and purposely so. Few elements could capture the true complexity and nuance of a culture like Peking Opera can. The movie, developed in the last three-strip Technicolor lab , allows the colour, technique, flexibility, and more, to show the product of the cultural embellishment in Peking Opera (Chinese culture). As well, to fully integrate into a culture, one must suffer cultural hazing. Douzi undergoes many initiations. His finger being chopped off, a pedophilic encounter with an old man and continual beatings for not accepting cultural role are examples of his initiations. But after accepting the throws of culture, he finds comfort and stability within his culture. Douzi's transfer of his stage character, the concubine, into real life is an affirmation of his cultural identity. The concubine must suffer in the opera, and therefore so must Douzi. The climax of his suffering is his own death, which is the ultimate instatement of cultural identity. At the opposite end of Douzi is Shitou, a character who is far more politically oriented than Douzi. Shitou can be considered a cultural sellout, someone who sees survival as more important than tradition. At the heels of Cultural Revolution Shitou abandons his history. For example, when both King and Concubine discuss their art to the young communists in an acting class, Shitou yields to the political flame of communism, agreeing with the young communists. And as artifacts of his cultural history are being burned in the streets (books and swords), he too dumps his personal history into the flames (wife and friend). Douzi can do nothing but kill himself, out of love for king and country, because his king has lost the final battle.

The tension between Douzi and Shitou embody the tension between Culture and politics. Chen shows that one end of the spectrum must suffer at the hands of the other. Throughout the film we feel sympathy for a dying way of life, especially as we grow to know more about the nature of Peking Opera. Our sympathy for opera suggests that alien political systems antagonize the cultural system, and therefore are an object of criticism. This is most apparent during the Cultural Revolution when traditional artifacts and ways of life are brutalized. The 'culture of revolution' according to Marx should destroy a bourgeois' past, and establish social and economic equality for the masses . Instead, what the Cultural Revolution destroyed was what made all Chinese equal and great, their cultural heritage. The revolutionists may have dispelled capitalist motivations, but first and foremost they destroyed the love between man and woman, between king and concubine, the very symbols of beauty in this film.

At the end of the film there is a concession to Chinese culture, when a Peking Opera is put on to celebrate the operas 200th anniversary. In Chen's China this is reality, a country opening up to the world and to new ideas. The only way to protect itself from ideological domination from America and other influences is to protect its heritage, and part of that heritage is the Peking Opera. For China to ensure the safety its heritage, the culture that has shaped individuals for thousands of years must also shape modern politics. Openly celebrating Peking Opera in Chen's film is making the personal 'political', and merging the two dichotomous entities into a single unifying element for China.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a chinese masterpiece that is banned for chinese to watch
merit-296341 February 2020
The movie isn't finished yet... until the chinese government allows this movie to the people of china and accepts flaws of its history after almost 30 years since the opening... nothing changed. what a masterpiece
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Still amazing after 25 years
joseph1989093025 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I used to know that was very famous, but never seen that before, But After watching ing, it's really amazing. The plot is very exciting. There are almost no fragments of the cold field. It's a wonderful interpretation of joy and sorrow swift in different eras, and the performance of acting as an actor. Very exciting, with this 90s movie, really impeccable!!!!!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the best Chinese movie in my heart
sjtunaoe8 May 2019
In 1993, when I was only a pupil, my grandfather took me to the cinema to see this great movie for the first time. At that time, I was too young to understand this movie and only surprised by the beautiful scene. Twenty years passed and I see this movie again because of my friend's recommendation. This time, I carefully follow the movie plot in about 2 hours and never feel any boring. This film is as perfect as an artistic works in every aspects such as photography, plot, acting skills and spiritual core. I think the most attractive element for me is the spiritual core. Through the story of two Beijing Opera stars, the movie shows an scroll of the Chinese social change among more than 50 years. It also focus on the ordinary people's hardship and suffering. Although the love is the topical subject for this movie as its name shows. But I think the director want to express more than love. It tells much more about the humanity under the extreme conditions. In one word, a person cannot say he is familiar with Chinese film if he hasn't seen this "farewell my concubine".
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Perhaps too ambitious
bandw27 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This film follows two Beijing opera stars (stage names Cheng and Duan) from their youth in 1924 to a final performance in 1977. Cheng is somewhat effeminate and plays women in the performances, most notably the woman in the traditional opera "Farewell My Concubine." Cheng is gay and in love with Duan who is classically masculine; Duan's feelings for Cheng do not go beyond friendship. Things between the two go along well until Juxian enters the picture as Duan's lover and subsequent wife. The story revolves around the complex emotional interplay between these three, played out against dramatic historical events.

The history of China in the years covered would require a shelf full of books, but this movie concentrates on three eras: "The Warlord Era" in the 1920s, the Japanese occupation of Beijing during WWII (and its aftermath), and the Cultural Revolution during the Mao era. The interweaving of the personal stories with the themes of the opera "Farewell My Concubine," together with the historical events, is cleverly done. The telling of this epic runs to 171 minutes on the DVD.

In keeping with its operatic theme this movie has an overture that sets the tone and piques your curiosity about what is to come. This sequence seemed artificial to me until I understood its intent.

Most everyone will be impressed with the sumptuous color cinematography. The opera scenes are impressively filmed and, while I could appreciate the artistry involved, being primarily attuned to Western culture prevented my being captivated on an emotional level as I was, for example, by the operatic scenes in "Amadeus." Cheng's singing sounded more like the harsh screeching of a cat than anything that would engage me. The atonal music and highly stylized acting in the operas were interesting as artistic phenomena of a foreign culture, but it would take significant exposure for me to ever truly enjoy such, if that were even possible.

The extent to which this movie offers history lessons is not clear to me, nor is it clear how much is intended. During the 1920s the focus is on Cheng and Duan's training as young boys under the tutelage of a sadistic taskmaster. The child abuse is so graphic that some may be tempted to avert their eyes. Was the brutal treatment of the boys a symbol of the brutality of the era? I don't know. The political pressures of the Cultural Revolution must have been extreme in order to provoke the personal denunciations we see toward the end.

One thing I found odd was that, while the characters must be at least sixty years old by the end, they look like they are still in their 30s.

I admire this movie for its ambition and could appreciate it on an intellectual and artistic basis, but its epic sweep and cultural differences kept me at a distance.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Epic -- the great narration of modern Chinese history
o-7200926 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a film about the modern history of China. If you are not in this history, you may have a lot of confusion.Even 157 minutes of movie time can be boring.The story begins with Peking Opera.This is an ancient oriental drama with incomparable dreams.It means the same to China as Shakespeare's plays do to England.But the story is not limited to it. Instead, it takes Beijing opera as the background and takes us into those 50 years with the life of two Peking Opera actors and Chinese history.You can see the change of government, the civil war, chaos, despair, obsession, and the biggest cultural destruction revolution in history.You can realize the fall and annihilation of an ideal character.Film photography is also excellent. Lens transformation, wide-angle, mobile photography, coupled with the color of memory, film directors and photographers use skilled skills to combine a large number of messy scenes into a wonderful story, and use these stories to create epic.In addition, I would like to thank the film actors for their wonderful performances. Zhang Guorong even got the best actress nomination of Cannes Film Festival. There are nearly a hundred characters in the film, but each one is very impressive. Their vivid performance will let you immerse in that period of history without feeling strange or weird.I highly recommend this movie!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An intriguing tale, spanning over 50 years.
akash_sebastian20 August 2015
An intriguing tale, with a fascinating chunk of modern Chinese history serving as the background. Spanning over 50 years, the film tells about the ups and downs of a traditional Peking Opera troupe, and its two stars, from 1924 to 1977. Not only do we see the various political events of the time, but also how the traditional opera and its stars are treated during different eras.

The two stars, Dieyi and Xiaolou, are brought up and trained to play specific roles - that of concubine and king respectively - in a famous play. Dieyi (Douzi) is trained, or should I say, forced to behave, sing, move and dance like a girl, from a very young age. The two of them share a unique and close bond, and this balance gets affected when a woman, Juxian, enters the picture. Their political naiveté get them into many problems, but it's their properly unresolved love triangle that causes more trouble.

The lines between fact and fiction are blurred when we realise the similarities between the play and their actual lives. Dieyi's devotion to opera and Xiaolou are as strong as the concubine's devotion to the king. (The lines are blurred even more when Leslie Cheung, bisexual himself, takes his life in 2003) The end is inevitable, as we realise while the story progresses, but it's reached with proper momentum and after an intriguing chain of events.

The acting by the three leads is really terrific. Leslie Cheung as the female-role playing opera star who's completely devoted to his art, Fengyi Zhang as a talented and playful man who can easily separate his private and work lives, and Gong Li as the prostitute-turned-wife whose shades of determination and compassion keeps us from not having a fixed view of her character. With Chen Kaige's talented direction and Gu Changwei's spectacular cinematography, the movie has many colourful and memorable scenes.

I really liked the movie, and wasn't bored for a single second. The movie deals with so many interesting themes - Modern Chinese history, sexuality, art and its reception, devotion and passion - but yet it somehow makes me feel that it had the potential to be much more compelling. Other than the political events, the characters could have been explored a little more.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
If you can stand the first hour, you might like the movie
rjciez18 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
After finishing watching "The Last Emperor", I found quite entertaining the way they portrayed events of modern Chinese history throughout the story of somebody's life. Since I know that movie might be a Hollywood-esque portray of those events, I looked for a movie with Chinese actors, that also developed through key events of modern Chinese history (e.g. the warlords, revolution, etc). Netflix suggested me "Farewell my concubine".

This movie was definitely not my cup of tea:

I found the first hour brutally violent, and hard to watch (the first 45-60 minutes). It might have been because in my opinion, the violence portray seemed to not help the development of the story.

The movie felt too long, and probably since I did not like the first hour of the movie due to the fact stated above, the last hour and a half felt a bit boring (something I did not feel in "The last emperor" which was also a loooong movie).

Finally. This is my own bias, since I do not like opera, the opera scenes seemed highly repetitive and the high pitch voice was hard to bear.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed