Cobb (1994) Poster

(1994)

User Reviews

Review this title
70 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Foul
rmax3048235 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I wonder if Al Stump ("Stumpy" to Cobb) realized what he was doing in telling this story, how much of himself and his own dilemma he was revealing. Frustrated because Cobb has final editorial approval of the biography in progress, Stump tells us in voice-over that he decided to do the one thing that Cobb never did -- lie. He would write one bio almost solely about baseball for Cobb to read, and another secret one, hidden away on scraps, that showed the real man and would be published after Cobb's death, which is never far away.

How can Stump make the statement that Cobb never lied? He seems to lie about anything, whenever the whim moves him, including the darkest aspects of his character determinants. Exaggerration, dissembling, hiding or shading the truth, it happens all the time with Cobb. Even about baseball, which was the most important thing in his life. He's dismissive of people like Babe Ruth. When Stump forces him to say SOMEthing good about the man, Cobb allows, "He could run okay -- for a fat man."

It leaves us wondering just how much of the story we're watching is true and how much was limned and polished after the fact since, after all, what Joyce Carol Oates called "pathographies" sell much better than hagiographies. We'd rather read about a bastard than a saint. It's corrupted our scholarship, but never mind. The movie is made watchable by Jones' performance. That's about it. Lolita Davidovitch is beautiful but her part is almost unnecessary. Stumpy combines nicely a particularly kind of Jewish Angst with an equally ethnic tendency to be pushed only so far before counterattacking on his own behalf. (I don't think I minded him as much as some other commentators seem to have.)

The script doesn't give poor Jones much to do except mutate into a Teppischfresser every few minutes, screaming, shouting, laughing hysterically, shooting off pistols, and in general carrying on like some animal in a zoo. He's given scenes that are simply not true to the character as otherwise written. Visiting his daughter's house in his home town, he sits in the car and watches while she looks out the window, identifies him, and draws the curtains closed. Tears trickle down his cheeks, but why? He hasn't bothered to contact her for fifteen years. A family get-together while they sit around the dinner table and trade compliments?

The Cobb we see in the rest of the film wouldn't have given a damn about his daughter or anyone else except himself. But maybe it has something to do with facing mortality. If so, it's not made clear. Still, the most affecting scene is one in which Cobb begins to vomit blood and cough up lung tissue in a motel bathroom. "This is how it starts," he mutters to his mirror image. "This is what it looks like." He might be scared as hell but he's never sorry for anything he's done and has no capacity for self pity.

Some people may find this trait -- not sparing anyone's feelings -- admirable. I don't. Social life is a tissue of lies from beginning to end, and if you don't make some minimal effort to play by this simple and somewhat silly rule of the game -- well, others are liable to treat you as if you had slid into second base wearing shoes with razor-sharp cleats. Al grows to like this old curmudgeon, but let's not forget that Cobb was Al's meal ticket.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
We shouldn't have to lie about our heroes.
TOMASBBloodhound21 September 2008
Cobb is the supposedly true account of the final days of the great ballplayer Ty Cobb as seen through the eyes of sportswriter Al Stump. Tommy Lee Jones gives an extraordinary performance as the doomed and rambunctious old man. And Robert Wuhl ends up just being along for the Ride as Stump. Though it likely plays a little hard and fast with the truth, Cobb is an engrossing film.

The film is told through the perspective of Al Stump who was one of the more prominent sports writers of his day. Early in the film he finds himself summoned to an elaborate yet secluded hunting lodge in the Sierra Mountains. Here he finds the angry old delusional ball player in a state just a few paces ahead of death from various cancers, ailments, and substance abuse. Cobb always seems to be pointing a pistol at those around him and occasionally firing rounds through nearby objects. Cobb knows he's about to die, but wants the complete story of his life to be told... his way! Cobb, as played by Jones is often cartoon-ish, and likely a great exaggeration of the true man. Though he claims to want Stump to only include Cobb's introspection of the game of baseball itself, he often readily offers up lurid details of his past. But then forcefully reminds his biographer, "that's not going in your book, though!" It's almost as if Cobb is using Stump as a man to relate his final confessions to, knowing for sure that many of these details will some day be told about him. If not in the book they are working on at the time. Or it could be that Cobb just needs someone to pour out his soul to in his final days, and lacks friends or close family to do it with. Either way, the film paints Cobb as a monster. And he likely wasn't as bad a guy as the film paints him. But still he was no prince, that is clear from basically every account of the man's life.

The film follows Cobb and Stump on several wild escapades inside casinos, seedy motels, and even the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, NY. Cobb is played as a violent, impotent, and repugnant junkie. Stump finds himself being more of a caregiver than a biographer by the film's end, and finds himself in a difficult situation. He is the only thing keeping Cobb alive, yet he cannot wait for the old man to die so he can spill all of his secrets in the book. Unfortunately, Stump ends up copping out with the manuscript, and only submitting the good things Cobb wanted the world to hear. He explanation.... he felt he needed Cobb to be a hero, and not the villain he proved to be. The film never really explains why Stump comes to this conclusion. And thus the viewer may feel a little short-changed. In the end, it looks like this film was only made for shock value is showing us what a monster Cobb was. But this makes the Stump character little more than just another audience member like us.

Overall, the film is decent enough. Jones is fun to watch, and you'll never forget his performance. Even if it was probably a great exaggeration. The film looks good, and captures the older periods quite well. The script is a foul-mouthed exercise in brutal self-degradation and poor treatment of others, however. There is some brutal violence, and even a sexual assault at gunpoint. For those looking for the cleaner side of the man, a trip to Cooperstown might be a better idea. 7 of 10 stars.

The Hound.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I live in his home town.
tydgoss16 August 2008
My grandma and her sister were both in the movie. They are in the church at the part that is filmed in Royston, Georgia. I have never seen the movie, that is why I gave it a 5. Royston is a really nice place that you should visit if you have seen the movie. There is a museum about Ty Cobb among other famous people from Royston. You can visit his grave site and places that the movie was filmed. We have a great downtown with shops and a few places to eat. Visit the funeral home and the train depot. It says that the minimum has to be 10 lines for a comment so I am trying to take up as much space as possible and I think that this is a stupid rule. Ty Cobb is one of the greatest baseball players ever and I am proud to live in is home town of Royston, Georgia.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great story despite being a lot darker than most sports biographies
bob the moo7 February 2004
When sportswriter Al Stump is contracted to write the autobiography of baseball player Ty Cobb, he believes he has it made. Cobb had a reputation as a mean player who is cruel, bigoted and monstrous. Al quickly learns that this reputation was well earned and that Cobb is all the things that he is reputed to be. As the pair set off to Reno in a middle of a snowstorm, Cobb tells him the story of his life, although the bitter, angry mess that is Cobb tells him all he needs to know about the past.

When I sat to watch this film, I was aware that it was meant to be pretty harsh in terms of how it portrayed Cobb, but I didn't realise just how little of his career this film would touch upon. The film never shirks from showing Cobb to be the monstrous man he was claimed to be - either in his cruel career where he would sharpen his studs to hurt opponents or his personal life where he destroyed his family. Despite this the first half (and much of the film) is a fairly lively, almost comic affair that is deceptively enjoyable to watch. What this overall tone succeeds in doing is making the rest of the film that much more shocking and powerful as a result. The first significant turn is where Cobb gets `laid' in Reno - a moment that turns quickly from sensitive and comic to violent and scary and then almost immediately to the tragic.

This film missed out on a full cinematic release due to harsh reviews, but I really don't understand why it got them. The only thing I can think of is that the reviewers felt this was an unfair portrayal of Cobb; I do not know anything about him, nor do I care about baseball as a sport so maybe I am being conned by this film but it is certainly a very interesting character who is looked at as part of an interesting and imaginative film. The film doesn't look very much at Ty's career but instead focuses on the man - this is much more interesting and it is done through straightforward means as well as more imaginative touches such as the extension of the career newsreel to Ty's low points.

The film really works well, but I cannot imagine it being as good were it not for the fiery performance from Jones. I don't know how close it is to the real Cobb, but for the material he gets it just right. He balances the character on a knife-edge to the point that nobody could really feel sorry for him but at the same time it is difficult to hate him. Support from Wuhl is OK but not really as good - he wisely stands in the shadow of Jones. The support cast do well, with a small but important performance from Davidovich.

Overall, this is much darker than I expected from a baseball film from Shelton; however it is better for it. I cannot comment on how fair it is to the real Cobb, but regardless of this it is a really enjoyable character piece with a great central performance. It keeps the audience by swinging wildly between the comic, the dark and the tragic, keeping us with it all the time. It is a dark drama but still enjoyable and sadly great underrated and underseen.
27 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wondeful job by Jones in a work of utter fiction
robertf-scott3714 February 2018
In bio-pics and other movies claiming to possess an historical basis, reviewers should stick to evaluating movies as movies and not as history, unless they happen to have a fair bit of grounding on the subject and/or events. Sad that so many here obviously hold an image of a a man on the basis of having read-or at least believing themselves familiar with the subject-a single work, and that, a book that has been utterly debunked a number of times (most recently in "War on the Basepaths" (Tim Horbaker-2015) and "Ty Cobb: A Terrible Beauty" (Charles Leerhsen-2015). Knowing what the screenplay was based upon, I went expecting a fictional portrayal of Cobb's last years and, my only reason for going, an accomplished and powerful performance by Tommy Lee Jones; both expectations were entirely met.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strong Performances Rise Above Distasteful Subject Matter
richievee26 February 2014
Watching "Cobb" is anything but an enjoyable experience, and yet I am glad to have seen it - - once. The title role is handled with great power by Tommy Lee Jones, who seems to have inhabited the fierce persona of Tyrus Raymond Cobb without becoming a caricature of that legendary sports figure. Yes, the acting is perhaps a bit over the top at times, but somehow those excesses fit well into the overarching story. Cobb was, after all, larger than life, even in his later years. The film is quite faithful to Al Stump's biography ("Cobb"), even to the point of Stump's appearance throughout the production as a character who receives at least as much screen time as Cobb himself. Few biographies, to my knowledge, place the author in such close proximity to the subject. Baseball action is nicely portrayed, mixing old footage with black-and-white recreations and often (Zelig- or Gump-like) placing Tommy Lee Jones among actual ballplayers and managers of the past. Watch for Roger Clemens as an opposing pitcher. It should be said that both the movie and the book concentrate much more heavily on the present day than Cobb's career with the Detroit Tigers. Indeed, maybe they should have been called "Cobb's Last Days," so lopsided are the narratives. Worth seeing, but rather unpleasant.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Vidiot Reviews
capone66618 July 2013
Cobb

You would think that in a sport where teams carry around baseball bats that its players wouldn't so blatantly insult each other.

However, the outfielder in this biography ran his mouth as much as his feet.

Hiring famed sportswriter Al Stump (Robert Wuhl), the cantankerous Ty Cobb (Tommy Lee Jones) hopes to whitewash his blemished baseball reputation with a glowing autobiography.

While staying with the 72-year-old alcoholic at his home in Lake Tahoe, Stump, himself, experiences the legendary irritability of the Hall of Famer.

Over the many months and miles he spends with Cobb, Stump must decide if he's going to pen a sanitized memoir or his own tell all.

Based on Stump's book, Tommy Lee Jones' performance is certainly a homerun, however, the story revels too much in Cobb's senility and deep-seated racism.

Furthermore, portraying baseball players as racists is insulting to those players who are just degenerate gamblers.

Yellow Light

vidiotreviews.blogspot.com
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a bad film
mm-3931 December 2002
My grandfather said he was the greatest baseball player ever. My grandfather came from the maritimes and I find their mannerisms quite similar to Southerners. This movie portrays Cobb as a great athlete but a lousy person. A guess sports has not changed much. This movie shows how diverse and complicated people can be. The movie shows the man's life and the fruits of his actions on and off the field. It was sort of a sad movie in the end. How one can waste so much.6/10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tommy Lee Jones at his Best
michaelf5 March 1999
This little seen film has Tommy Lee Jones giving one of the best performances of his career. It is a shame that the film was given only a limited release with no advertising budget. I know of many who wanted to see this movie, but it was in and out of the theaters before they could notice.

"Cobb" gets one of my highest recommendations. No Jones fan can justify not seeing this movie.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The "greatest" player of baseball.
KingM2113 September 2005
Based off the biographical book and article by sportswriter Al Stump, this is the story of Ty Cobb, the "greatest" player of baseball. Tommy Lee Jones does a terrific job playing Cobb and Stump is played by Robert Wuhl (the reporter who asks for a grant in Batman), whose performance sometimes feels a bit fake. The movie has Stump follow around a dying but still lively Cobb (at his demand, I mean, request) in his final months of life. See, Cobb wants the true story of his life to be told. And boy, what a story it is. The movie manages to be both tragically sad and quite humorous (Cobb is a handful and one vulgar SOB!) and at that, a pretty entertaining feature. Even non-baseball fans could enjoy it.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"It's been two years since I got my pecker up in the air."
utgard1421 May 2014
First things first, this movie is based off of a book written by Al Stump, who is played by Robert Wuhl in the film. Al Stump in recent years has proved to be a liar and a forger so sports historians are calling into question a great deal of his supposed insight into Ty Cobb. In other words, in all likelihood Mr. Stump exaggerated or outright made up most of his allegations against Cobb to sell books. That isn't to say Ty Cobb was a prince of a human being because there's enough contemporary evidence to show that he wasn't. But some of the most vile things that have been said about him can be traced to Stump's writing. So take the things this movie has to say with a huge grain of salt.

Another black mark against the film is that it has very little actual baseball in it. This movie doesn't care about Cobb the baseball giant. It only cares about Cobb the asshole. To include one side of the man without the other is a pointless exercise in self-righteousness. Why is a biography of Ty Cobb even necessary without his baseball accomplishments? Because he was a racist and a bully? There are millions of those, past and present, who aren't getting movies made about them. It just defies reason. Cobb was one of the greatest (and dirtiest) baseball players ever. Going by this movie, however, you would think he was just some crotchety old man who shared wacky adventures with a sports reporter.

Tommy Lee Jones was too old to play this role, as is especially evident in the flashbacks to when Cobb was younger. He plays Cobb as a silly cantankerous cartoon of a man. Every bit as over the top as his performance of Two Face in Batman Forever. Let that sink in for a minute. Robert Wuhl plays himself as he always does. The movie is entertaining in spots. The comedic parts work better than the dramatic. I can't really recommend it because the bad outweighs the good and, personally, knowing about Stump leaves a bad taste in my mouth over the whole thing.
26 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest performance I ever see
cobb88 February 2002
I love this movie. I have seen it about 13 times. This is Tommy Lee Jones' best performance, just beautiful. I can not believe that he didn't recieve an Oscar nomination for this performance. That year Tom Hanks won the Oscar for 'Forrest Gump' That's Ok. But check the other nominees: Morgan Freeman (The shawshank ...); Paul Newman (Nobody's fool) and John Travolta (Pulp Fiction). Are you going to tell me that these performances are better than the Jones' in Cobb? I don't think so. Anyway, the movie is great. You must see it. 10 of 10
17 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining, But Apparently Not A Fair Portrayal Of One Of Baseball's Best Ever
sddavis635 July 2015
So, what do I know about Ty Cobb? Admittedly not very much. He's a baseball player of a bygone era. I've seen pictures of him, and I know that his statistics suggest that he was one of the best (if not the best) baseball players of all time. But, of course, it's hard to compare baseball players (or any athlete) of almost a hundred years ago with more recent figures. Times have changed; so has the game. I watched this to learn a little more about a legendary figure. How much I learned depends on how accurate Al Stump's biography of Cobb is. Stump wrote the biography on which this movie was based, and his honesty has been widely called into question. Here, Cobb is portrayed as a very violent man, a heavy drinker and a racist - disliked by almost everyone who knew him. That latter part at least is apparently true. From what I've read even his own teammates couldn't stand him. The rest may be exaggerated. He was certainly a driven man, treating baseball as if it were a war, willing to deliberately injure his opponents and passionate to the point of obsession with winning - which makes one part of his baseball career curious: he never won a World Series, and in the three in which he played, he didn't perform well. Enigmatic, to say the least.

This movie doesn't really focus on baseball. There's a little bit of game action portrayed (with Roger Clemens doing a cameo as an opposing pitcher) and some recreated newsreel footage, with Tommy Lee Jones substituting for the real Cobb, but mostly it's a portrayal of Cobb's life, and something of an exploration of what made Cobb the type of player and person he was. As a line from the movie put it, "the greatest baseball player ever was also the greatest bastard." Whether that's true or not is, as I mentioned, a point of contention and depends on Stump's accuracy. It is true, as the movie points out, that his father was killed when he was a teenager, and his mother was charged with the murder and acquitted. It's also true that he spent most of his later life estranged from his children. That's always very sad.

Jones was excellent in his portrayal of Cobb, and Robert Wuhl handled the part of Stump quite well. The movie is sometimes funny (such as the wild car ride down the mountains), sometimes disturbing (such as Cobb's assault on Ramona, played by Lolita Davidovitch) and sometimes even sad (as, near the end, when Cobb starts spitting up blood and is obviously frightened, knowing that the end is near.) It's accuracy may be questionable, but it's an enjoyable enough film. I did expect, as I suggested earlier, a little more of a portrayal through flashbacks of Cobb's's baseball career, but Stump's take on the man's life is entertaining enough, even if it is exaggerated and paints Cobb in a more negative light than he deserves. (7/10)
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring bunch of crude fantasy, nothing worthwhile here
FlushingCaps23 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The movie attempts to present what sort of person baseball great Ty Cobb was, by showing the last several months of his life, focusing on his collaboration with Al Stump, to write Cobb's autobiography, starting in the summer of 1960 and running through the death of Cobb in July 1961. We get a few swirly flashback scenes of some grim moments in Cobb's life, primarily a few looks at the circumstances surrounding the shooting death of his father in 1905. The only baseball footage comes from one "memory" of Cobb's plus what is supposed to have been an old newsreel biography of his playing career that, for reasons unknown, focuses almost solely on scenes that supposedly took place during the 1916 season. So much of the film deals with Stump's life and activities in working with Cobb that the movie would have been more appropriately named "Stump."

The portrait of the elderly Cobb is not to be believed. He appears to be a drug-addicted (Painkillers) lunatic who went around with his pistol shooting into the air and at walls whenever he wanted to get someone's attention. According to this film, Cobb was a foul-mouthed man who sounded rather uneducated and a man whom all around feared for their safety. Coming from the fantasy pen of Al Stump, none of this in any way describes the real Ty Cobb, based on the evidence of all the people who did know him in his last years. In other words, anyone seeking to learn anything at all about Ty Cobb should look elsewhere.

If you like biography movies because they teach you about how people lived in the old days, this is also a film to be avoided because the total footage that is shown that is supposed to take place before the last year of Cobb's life is less than five minutes. If you want to see how realistic the baseball scenes are—forget it. Not counting the "newsreel" you see one at bat by Cobb, a double, and two stolen bases, each ending with a kick to the crotch with the second followed by a donnybrook. This is not a film about the life of this famous ballplayer, it is a film about several months near the end of his life with almost no time devoted to telling you about all the things he did in his life.

Even in that one baseball game that is depicted, we see no interaction between Cobb and his teammates—not even a view of a clubhouse. We see no manager of the Tigers—indeed, we never learn from this film that Cobb managed the Tigers for 6 years. A large part of Cobb's autobiography, the one he hired Stump to help him write, deals with Cobb's ongoing disputes with Tiger owner Frank Navin. There is no mention of Navin in this film. While Babe Ruth was mentioned, there were no scenes showing Cobb and Ruth on the baseball field, or in a hotel room, or playing golf together as they did. Perhaps they couldn't find an actor who looked anything like the Babe. Check that—after all, Tommy Lee Jones doesn't look anything like Ty Cobb and that didn't stop them.

What we have is a movie with much more cursing than necessary to set the mood, and for no particular reason, there was even a quasi-sex scene that seemed designed just to convince you even more that Cobb was a nasty old man. We know his family found him hard to get along with, but throughout his life he was polite in public and obliging to autograph seekers and others who visited him, especially if they wanted to talk about baseball. This film doesn't even suggest that he was ever nice to anyone.

If you have read other sources and know about the real Cobb, you know this movie is almost 100% concocted by the fantasies of Al Stump. If you knew little about this baseball great and believe anything you saw, you know less about him than you did before. Three times or more they declare that Cobb invented the style of baseball that featured aggressive base running and stealing bases and more, even though that is totally false.

With the simple title of "Cobb," any viewer would expect it to be about the man's whole life—or at least a large part of it, perhaps even the parts that made him famous. Another possible title that would have been more accurate is: "Cobb—ten months at the end of his life." As a fictional film this was a dreadfully boring show about a two-bit writer and a nasty old man who seemed like a lunatic. Full of excessive cussing and devoid of any reason to like either character, it would rate a 3 out of 10. But because it claims to portray a very real man and depicts someone far, far different from the real person, complete with a made-up memory scene of how Cobb's father died—one that Ty could not have told Stump because 1) it didn't happen that way at all, and 2) because Ty wasn't there at the time—I find this film rather offensive. So I give it the lowest score allowed here—a one.
20 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a Ballplayer, comedy
Chukar29 November 2003
This film is one of my all time favorites. There are some things in the film that I am less than happy about, such as the attempted rape in the hotel room in Reno. I don't believe it actually happened. I have read a few biographical books on Cobb and even though few people ever liked him, there were some things he would not do. Its strange, but many people will see somebody who is detestable, in most respects, and that person is therefore guilty of anything that can be said about him. Ty Cobb was a "son of the south" who never got over his father's murder, and he also never, ever, got over the Civil War. As I recall, he entered the major's in 1904 or 1905.

As I said above, the movie "Cobb" is best viewed as a comedy; and I think it was intended to be seen as such by the film makers. I compare it to the film, "A Clockwork Orange." In A Clockwork Orange you had a story of a guy name Alex who had things happen to him, often humorous, because of who he was. At the end of A Clockwork Orange, in the last scene, you have to admit that you could only snicker at what was on Alex's mind listening to his beloved 9th once again, since he had now been "cured." I also remember the scene in the film that you see from the Bible where Jesus is carrying the cross and is being flogged. The camera pans back to the Roman who is doing the whipping, and it is Alex.

In Cobb, the first part of the movie is one of the funniest I have ever seen; especially the ride down the hill in the snow to Reno. The film has a lot of truth in it but it actually leaves out a lot. The Scene in which you see Cobb beating up the fan who is crippled is true. But what is not said is that the whole team put itself on the line in backing Cobb in what he did; they went on strike against Cobb's suspension. So, Cobb was not hated quite like he was shown to be in the film, and the film did a discredit to Cobb in some areas. Oh, by the way, that fan that was beatup in the film was Jimmy Buffet from "Lost in Margaritaville" music fame. Jimmy is a good friend of Tommy Lee Jones.

Actually, I rather doubt that you could make a real true film about Ty Cobb that could be saleable at the box-office. Ty Cobb was not funny, and he had little sense of humor; he absolutely had no sense of humor about himself. He was a bigot. You did not dare make fun of him to his face. He could explode into a life threatening altercation at the drop of a hat. However, I do believe he was courteous to women for the most part, and that is another area I have problem with what is depicted in the film. Cobb was a Redneck and a great deal like many other Rednecks from the south at that time. In his time there was a great deal of KKK activity going on in the South and the rest of the country for that matter. Cobb reflected his times, and never changed.

Also, baseball was a lot different then than it is today. It was a completely different time. Baseball was the ticket for the poor and exploited to get out of the coal mines, the iron mills, or the farm fields. It was much more of a dog eat dog world than it is today. The average player today can move into some other endeavor if he didn't make it. In Cobb's time, it was back to the coal mines and an early death. To quote Ty Cobb: "It's no pink tea, and mollycoddler's had better stay out." Baseball was a do or die affair and there were no holds barred as long as you could get away with it.

Cobb, in many ways was not that different than many, but he was the best baseball player of his time, and quite possibly the greatest that ever lived. And, he played baseball with a fury that nobody else, before or since, has played with. Unfortunately, he could not turn off that fury when he wasn't playing the game. For Ty Cobb, baseball was absolute war and he devoted himself 100-percent to playing it that way and he also devoted his mental capacities 100-percent to the study of getting the edge on his opponents. He would do or say anything to get you out of your game. Cobb could also circle the bases faster than anyone who has ever played the game, with his spikes sharpened. He was rather big for his time and was about the same height as Babe Ruth. Couple that size with that speed and the grit in his demeanor and nobody ever enjoyed or looked forward to playing against him. "What a ballplayer."
25 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Heroes have clay feet too!
lib-415 October 1998
Tommy Lee Jones is convincing as the despicable Cobb. He swaggers and bullies his way through the movie like the man he portrays. Robert Wuhl is a nice foil for the overbearing man he must cajole to get his story. What could have been a depressing movie was actually entertaining because of the spice and verve of Jones. The costumes are eye-appealing- very much like this anti-hero wore. This is a film about a human gone wrong- a hero of sports yet unable to relate in a kind way to anyone. Some of the scenes are remarkably funny- like the car ride down a snowy road, other scenes sad- like when Cobb's daughter won't come out of the house and other ball players won't let him join the party. The director did a good job of rounding out the story of this obnoxious but talented man.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"cobb"led out in various ways
lee_eisenberg10 November 2006
I had never heard of Ty Cobb before watching this movie, so it's hard to say how shocking the movie was for me (I could have known about him as a baseball player but not known how he was as a person, which would have shocked me royally). "Cobb" is sort of unpleasant to watch, but a good look at an important part of baseball history. Telling how writer Al Stump (Robert Wuhl) traveled around the country with the title character (Tommy Lee Jones), we see who he really was.

A previous reviewer said that a problem with this movie is that it plays off of our obsession with seeing what bastards famous people were. Maybe so, but would we rather have his entire life whitewashed? It seems like Ty Cobb never did anything that wasn't violent. A product of his upbringing? Well, the guy was clearly a racist, and there was that incident with his mother (which he admitted turned him into a real prick).

So, given what you think of Ty Cobb, you'll probably love or hate this movie. Don't expect anything "nice". Also starring Lolita Davidovitch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
horrible horrible man
SnoopyStyle19 August 2021
It's 1960. Sports writer Al Stump (Robert Wuhl) is told that legendary baseball player and malcontent Ty Cobb (Tommy Lee Jones) wants to meet him. Cobb is over 70 and has been inducted into the Hall of Fame. Al arrives to gunfight in the mansion. Cobb has chased off most of the staff. He's a bitter drunk, a racist, and a violent bully. He demands that Al write a fluff-piece biography. They have an incident with nightclub cigar girl Ramona (Lolita Davidovich).

Ty is a grumpy old man. Unlike the comedy, he's not loveable but he is interesting. Tommy Lee Jones does an amazing job. It's a compelling performance of an offensive character. TLJ almost makes the audience love him but he's a horrible, horrible man. That's the great conflict in the movie. Do we actually like him? Do we pity him? It makes it hard to like this movie. Again, he's a horrible, horrible character. I do question whether he actually pistol-whipped a man to death in real life. Davidovich has a small section but an outsized effect. Her scene is shocking. The movie is thirty minutes too long. I would have ended it quickly soon after the Hall of Fame. I don't need to get deeper into his mind. I don't need to know his dark family secret. I'm sure he's terribly damaged with all kinds of crazy dark secrets. I don't even need Al's own drama. He's only the lens through which we see this story. We don't need to get close and personal with the lens. The story was done after the Hall of Fame. We just needed a closing text telling us when he dies.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Elegant film that shows the dark side of The First man Inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame
ndyjones18 November 1998
Ron Shelton's Cobb is a magnificant film that gives insight into the "dark brooding soul" of one of America's Baseball heros. Based on Tyrus Ramond Cobb's biography as written by Al Stump, it paints the picture of a wretched man, who is still today remebered as one of the Greatest Baseball players of all Time. Tommy Lee Jones' performance as Ty Cobb is captivating and often scary as he captures the essence of a truly horrible man. Sadly his performance is unrecognized and is possible one of his best of all time. The film is journey into one man's dark half and a fantastic addition to any collection.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tommy Lee Jones and another home run, a brilliant performance in a biopic
Robert_duder1 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know how much of Cobb is fact and how much is fiction. If it is closer to fact than Ty Cobb was a complete and utter ass. A spiteful and hateful man that didn't seem to be worth writing about let alone making a film about but when you peel back the layers you discover so much more about the man and that's what this film tries to capture. The one thing it doesn't truly touch on is that Ty Cobb was about Baseball...period. I thought Cobb would actually show the baseball career of Ty Cobb and it barely shows some flashbacks of such. This film is truly about Cobb in his final days and the infamous rumors circulating the man and his wild personality as told to world famous Sport's writer Al Stump. Sports screen writer Ron Shelton creates an incredible story surrounding a sport's legend based on the real book written by the real Al Stump (who was also an adviser on the film.) Shelton actually manages to make us see the underside of Ty Cobb. Sure the man is a total lunatic, raving about his younger days and his self imposed greatness but there is a sadness lurking below him, a sarcasm to all his behavior, a desire to be loved by making himself hated.

Who could play this diverse, and flexible character and make it his own. The incomparable Tommy Lee Jones, that's who. This is one of Jones' best performances and he was absolutely robbed by not getting some sort of nomination for some sort of award. He is the only actor who could create an absolute human monster and still manage to make you feel sorry for him, to make you sense his greatness and his talent. On top of that he plays the man dying in one breath and then goes back for Flashbacks and looks convincing as his younger self. He looks sickly and old and really close to death in his later scenes and he just does an incredible job of really embracing Ty Cobb. Robert Wuhl is an odd actor to take on in a lead role in this film. I say that because at the time and even now he was basically at best a supporting actor. I only remembered him in a small role in 1989's Batman. Besides that and a run with the successful TV Series Arli$$ playing a Sport's Agent (which was after Cobb) he was a no-name and a risk to put him opposite talent like Tommy Lee Jones. I think it was a risk worth taking!! Wuhl does a terrific job as Sport's writer Al Stump (Stumpy.) Their chemistry is unmistakable and both men are such flawed characters (Cobb more than Stump obviously) but they are both battling themselves in one way or another. Wuhl also narrates the story and kind of gives us an inside idea as to what is going on in his own mind as he tries to deal with this Baseball legend. Although I wouldn't describe Wuhl's performance as equal to Jones', I would say he holds his own and does a terrific job.

Ron Shelton also directs the film and is certainly no stranger to sports films. After doing Bull Durham, Blue Chips and White Men Can't Jump he really put himself into Cobb. All his sports films are so much more than just about the sport. He brings out his characters and makes you feel them and really care about them and he goes all out with Cobb. You become completely entangled in these two men's lives as they travel together. The film is not about Baseball, it's not about the story, or the trip, or the legends, it's about Ty Cobb...period. Again I don't know how accurate the information is but here he is on the table no holds barred and it's brilliant. It's a biopic about a man that the world hated but no more than I think he hated himself and no more than what he created himself to be. You have to look at small details like his support of fellow team mate Mickey Cochrane, the way his eyes light up when he speaks of his children and the constant mention of his parents and his father's death. I read several reviewers that brought up the point in the narration when Al Stump says "I did something Ty Cobb never did...lie." They point out that Ty Cobb lied about everything and I think that was the idea...that comment was entirely, heavily sarcastic. See the film for yourself because Baseball fans and Tommy Lee Jones fans and fans of powerful biopics will love it. For others it might move a little slowly. It's worth seeing. 8.5/10
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A fairy tail written by a guy convicted of stealing from the Cobb estate.
intrepidami22 February 2017
Let's start out with a few indisputable facts. At first, Al Stump wrote a glowing book about Ty Cobb which did very well. After Cobb's death, he recanted. He started in stag men's magazines, that also talk about aliens, and Voodoo. Hardly a reputable source. This is where he invented the details of the shooting. Eventually he gave credit for the details to a neighbor of Cobb. There's only one problem, this guy was dead 4 years before Cobb ever approached Stump to write his book! They never even traveled to Royston Georgia. Where Stump claims Cobb started telling Stump about the incident.

Stump stole tons of artifacts from the Estate and eventually got caught! This is the character of the story teller here folks. He was even selling multiple copies of forged letters! Forged Autographs. Writing new stories and selling Cobb memorabilia was his meal ticket.

Somehow this aspect never gets reported. Go ask anybody in the sports memorabilia market if they're interested in stuff from Al Stump, and get ready for an earful. It's all considered fake and forged. But what he said about Cobb is gospel? So I come here and read all these reviews and as usual people just believe all these things and even stamp them as authentic and true.

By the time Stump met Cobb he was elderly and frail. None of that manic misadventures stuff happened! There's no corroboration on any of those insanely made up movie events. Nobody shot off a gun in a casino. Or any of the rest of it.

Cobb was a curmudgeon who pushed everybody away, even family. Most of the Urban legends about him are just that. I run into old miserable guys all day long. I've actually been to Royston Georgia and interviewed people.

They all have stories about Cobb being off putting and speaking his mind. But they all also have stories about his generosity. He made it possible for children charities to thrive 70 years after his death. He donated the single biggest endowment in US history at the time. As the black lady who ran his Museum said "Look around, who do you think that benefited?" She also mentioned how all of his staff received pensions. Something unheard of back then.

I'm not saying the guy wasn't racist. From all of his quotes, he didn't particularly care for people of any race! But he came from a time period where everybody was racist.

There is only one truth in this entire movie. At the time of his death, he was considered far and wide the best player ever. By the sports writers who saw him play! Day in, day out. How that has morphed into him not even making lists nowadays is the true intolerance. While Ruth is still right there on on top of many.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
athlete-hero as sonofabitch
rupie2 June 1999
If this movie exaggerates the nastiness of Ty Cobb, his descendants could sue. Then again if the movie is accurate, his descendants clearly despise him as much as anyone else. The weirdly symbiotic relationship between Cobb and his hapless biographer Aaron Stump is engrossing to watch, but it is Tommy Lee Jones' performance that makes the movie. The performance borders on chewing up the scenery, but it's mesmerizing.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As much truth in this movie about Cobb as there was in 2001's Pearl Harbor
martinmcdonough13 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A movie like this one just goes to show that if anyone involved in making this movie had bothered to do a shred of research into the life of Cobb, they would have quickly realized that Al Stump fabricated the vast majority of what has become the unfortunate long held beliefs about Cobb. It's too bad that no one looked any further than his book and just ran with it as Gospel.

Al Stump has been largely discredited due to these fabrications, false statements, forgeries and sensationalizing events in Cobb's life to cast him in an unflattering light. This movie hones in on them and magnifies them.

To start with the small stuff, Cobb was not, as commonly believed, a dirty player - and this is according to men he played against. He was tough, rough, and an agitator, but he never "sharpened his spikes" as legend (and the film) attest. Nor did he pistol-whip blacks for no reason. Nor was he a raging racist (he said that blacks should be allowed to play ball wholeheartedly).

If you want to know the true Ty Cobb, the one that Al Stump threw into the dustbin in favor of his fabrication, read "A Terrible Beauty" by Charles Leerhsen. HE did some actual research. It's a shame that people as bright as Ron Shelton (director) and Ken Burns (Baseball mini-series) never took the time to investigate any of Stump's wild accusations.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining, but much of it is fiction
ruthlessroddy5 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I first saw this movie some 20 years ago and thought what most people probably thought, that Cobb was an amazing ballplayer, and a half-crazy racist. Yet I recently read George Leershen's book 'Ty Cobb: A Terrible Beauty' and my opinion has definitely been swayed. Mr. Leershen researched Cobb like no other and discovered that much of the things said and written about him (most notably by Al Stump's and his book that the film was based on) were untrue or wildly exaggerated. Cobb never killed a man, he wasn't a racist (in fact his Father, Grandfather AND Great Grandfather were abolitionists if nothing else), he never sharpened his spikes, and never went out of his way to use them on somebody, unless they were in his path to the base. Even that famous picture of him flying airborne into what looks like the crotch of the catcher, was really him knocking the ball out of his glove, which he did, confirmed by the catcher himself. Al Stump was a notorious liar and fabricator who's 'Tale' of Ty Cobb didn't nearly add up to all of Leershen research or even Cobb's Grandson's first hand knowledge of Ty's place in Tahoe, both know more of truth than what Stump was willing to write about, for the sake of telling the story he wanted for the sole interests of making money, which is why he waited until AFTER Cobb died to release it.

Now all that being said, was Cobb an Angel? Absolutely not, but let's look at the facts of what we know for sure. Cobb was relentlessly Hazed by other players before and after his Mother killed his Father mere weeks before his professional debut at 18 years old. And most baseball players back then were poorly educated, alcoholic thugs. Take a look at some of those early Detroit Tiger team photos that Cobb played on, never before does 'A picture speak a thousand words' or hold more truth than some of the faces and personalities you'll see he came up playing with. Cobb himself was educated and liked to read, yet he also loved the game of baseball and overcame a lot to prove what he could do and that he 'belonged', always playing as if his life depended on it. Many players in turn became jealous of his abilities and 'wild-child' ways on the base paths, which only added to his legend of how he was able to do what he did.

Did Cobb have a couple of altercations with people of color? Yes, but make no mistake he had WAY more altercations with whites. Cobb didn't hate black people, I don't even think Cobb hated anybody, but if you got in his way or went up against him, he would have something to prove, black, white or even a handicapped guy in the stands in a wheel chair missing a few fingers. Apparently that heckler in question was pretty famous for it, and had been laying into Cobb whenever he came into town for a while until finally Cobb snapped and went up into the stands to shut him up once and for all. Does anybody know what the guy said to Cobb? Not sure, but you could easily imagine a couple of sore spots in Cobb's life that would potentially set him off. If you add what Cobb endured and had to overcome from others and it explains his behavior a little better. It by no means gives him a free pass, but it put things in a different context.

People love to knock other people, and in case you didn't notice, this goes on today more than ever, in newspapers and social media etc. Ty Cobb was in a league of his own and people either loved or hated him for it. Al Stump took some random stories handed down through the years, twisted them into what he wanted while adding some of his own BS and turned it into a book he thought would sell.. And then they made a movie from THAT book?! Cobb could be a lot of unpleasant things at times, but he too was once an innocent baby who eventually got molded into the man who became one of the greatest to ever play baseball, but at a price. Without the hazing or his Father's untimely death, who knows if those demons would have pushed him to that same greatness? Let alone becoming the ornery, temperamental man he was? A Terrible Beauty Indeed.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a disturbing bio-pic that tries (and achieves) a visceral reaction
Quinoa198421 November 2004
Under-rated and under-seen at the time of its original release, Cobb is the kind of sports film that would be un-watchable if it weren't made with such care to the dramatic side of things. Ron Shelton, responsible for such films as Bull Durham and Play it to the Bone, takes the story of finding a story as the basis for this tale of the legend Ty Cobb. Stump (Roberto Wuhl, pre-Arliss) takes on the task of writing a biography of one of the most notorious players of baseball, and when he meets him and starts to know him, he's almost scared to death. We learn from Cobb himself (in Tommy Lee Jones' equivalent to Robert De Niro in Raging Bull) about his early years, his personal life to a degree (some of this is in detail, some of it's just in creative little snippets later on in the film), but not a whole lot about baseball. But what is known practically sums up the man- he felt a thrill in torturing the offensive team and getting jeered as he broke records (some of which may still stand today). As the story progresses, the relationship between Stump and Cobb is what becomes the focal point, and it's a tense, depressing, and oddly exciting path.

The details in the story, not of the flattering sort by any measure, give the film an appeal that would've been lost if it were one of those straight-to-TV movies where you'd only get hints of the man's nature. By way of the writer getting a story, Shelton brings revelatory points that are rather interesting, of occasionally off-putting. It's hard to imagine what it would be like to ride with Cobb, but watching it this way brings on a visceral reaction, at least from me. I first saw this film when I was younger when it was first on HBO, and I saw it again recently. As a case in psychology, it's a good movie. As a portrait of disintegration it's even better. But if you're thinking of getting a news-reel portraying only his accomplishments, look elsewhere. I'm not sure if Ty Cobb was a great baseball player, but the film doesn't spare him at least some praise in that area. That Jones steals the show is no surprise either. A-
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed