Love Affair (1994) Poster

(1994)

User Reviews

Review this title
50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A Weak Remake to Satisfy Warren Beatty's Ego
claudio_carvalho19 July 2013
The 1932 "Love Affair" is one of the most beautiful, charming and brokenhearted love stories of the cinema industry. Irene Dunne and Charles Boyer have the perfect chemistry and it is impossible not fall in love for her.

The 1957 "An Affair to Remember" is a remake frame by frame of the original movie and also more famous. Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr also have perfect chemistry and had been my favorite romance after "Casablanca" until the day I saw the 1932 "Love Affair".

I was curious to see the 1994 version of "Love Affair" and I found it a weak remake maybe to satisfy the ego of Warren Beatty. The introduction is awful with annoying music score and edition. Mike Gambril is a detestable character and I do not see any reason for Terry falling in love with him. It is only good to see Ms. Katharine Hepburn in her last feature. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "Segredos do Coração" ("Secrets of the Heart")
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
There's Something About Music
albechri4 May 2000
The movie started as a usual affair movie. Yet it went along straight in the middle and peaking up after it.

One thing to be noted is the affection made by the music. It dominate the movie and swing our mood back and forth. And the tune Katherine Hepburn 'played' on piano really works well, with an additional song 'I Will' from the Beatles which turns out to be the movie secondary theme.

The original movie has been remade before this, and many other movie uses the original 'Love Affair' as an additional magnet to it. It isn't too hard to guess where the storyline went.

But the ending still caught us in deep emotion. We strongly feel love in it.

Recommended for Saturday evening movie with your spouse alone.
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Split decision
Costu-220 September 1999
It was very difficult to decide how to rate this movie. I'd not seen the Cary Grant / Deborah Kerr version (except for the little snippets that appear in "Sleepless in Seattle"), so my opinion was not colored by the inevitable comparisons... It's just that the first half of the movie struck me as being incredibly *bad* : it was poorly written in particular. Once Katherine Hepburn appeared on the scene, the film began to improve quite noticeably, and the last half was considerably better, with superb performances, especially from the two principals. I've never been a big Warren Beatty fan, but Annette Bening is WONDERFUL! (I think I've fallen in love!!!) -- To sum up, the first half of the movie rates a 3 in my book, the second half an 8 -- hence my overall grade of 5.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rent An Affair To Remember Instead!
hillari11 December 2000
Why did Beatty and Bening decide to do a remake of one of the most romantic films of all time? They should have left it alone. There is little chemistry between them (despite the fact they are married in real life). No dramatic tension, no nothing. Katherine Hepburn, in a brief appearance, is the only bright spark in the whole thing.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This version of a movie previously filmed twice was quite charming for this first time Love Affair viewer
tavm31 March 2008
Had my mom not rented this from Netflix, I probably wouldn't have bothered to see this third version of a romance previously filmed twice before by Leo McCarey. Real-life married couple Warren Beatty and Annette Bening play two people engaged to others (Kate Capshaw, Pierce Brosnan) who chance meet on a plane and then fall for each other on a cruise ship. At a pit stop, they visit Beatty's aunt (Katherine Hepburn in her last feature role) who provides some views about love. After that, they make a pact to meet at the Empire State Building after a few months and...well, if you've seen the other two (which I haven't) you know what happens. I wasn't sure what to think of this movie with many of the quick-cutting of some scenes and many of the somewhat benign nature of some of the dialogue at the beginning but by the time of Hepburn's appearance, I was charmed by the way Beatty and, especially, Bening interacted with the veteran 4-time Oscar winner especially with the way Ms. Hepburn used a certain word in asking about ducks. Also with her appearance as well as a later one with Ray Charles singing "The Christmas Song", I wondered about what great losses we've had the last five or so years. Many of the supporting cast like Garry Shandling and Harold Ramis (neither of whom I thought had any funny scenes) I recognized but I didn't realize Wendie Jo Sperber and Lisa Edelstein were here until I read the end credits. I did like also some of the musical selections like the "M'm! M'm! Good!" spot with Ed McMahon, the children's chorus of The Beatles' "I Will", and that duet with Louis Jordan and Louis Armstrong on "Life Is So Peculiar" that scored some of the cruise scenes. And the concluding scene was quite touching (if not tear-inducing) that I'm willing to give this version of Love Affair a pass. Bottom line, this was worth seeing for any romantics still out there.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst Remake!
moo-1311 February 2000
If you haven't seen the Beatty/Bening remake of An Affair to Remember - don't! This review is for readers who have seen the original and know the basic premise. I was drawn to the movie because of Bening - I enjoy her other films, but this one is a mockery of her talent! The on-screen chemistry between her and Warren just isn't there. The taboo of engaged couples "cheating" on one another is stale and the premise that Bening selflessly gets on with her life after her accident is implausible in today's world. The chance that Beatty would have a little auntie (even if that auntie is Katherine Hepburn) living on a tropical island that just happens to be close to where the plane he was flying in makes an emergency landing, is too much of a coincidence even for a fairy tale. This movie is beyond real! The jazz vocal narrative is annoying and out of place. As for the tear jerker ending, Warren can't even come close to replicating the look on Cary Grant's face when he realizes the devastating truth about Deborah Kerr. Oh what I'd give for a really good love story!
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This could have been a 5 star movie!
MSF114622 February 2003
The beginning of this movie misleads the viewer to take the production as a light hearted semi-comedy.Gary SHANDLING,Harold RAMIS et.al that give this film a comedic appearance are miscast.This film is a study

of the life changing affect that true love can produce.The character

evolvement of BEATTY was not properly developed early.A different supporting cast{besides HEPBURN} & plot tone could have possibly produced a classic!The movie takes a 180 degree turn when BENNING meets HEPBURN & the Old style meets new breed.HEPBURN elevates this movie from an ordinary run to a second half that is breathtaking.She could have been an oscar winner had this been a completely serious movie from beginning to end.Hepburn's personality & delivery of her thought provoking lines were a masterpiece.To their credit Benning & Beatty were able to carry on the profound level of acting & purpose established by HEPBURN...This movie has a beautiful ending,conclusion.This should have,could have been a movie for the ages!
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
sincere remake
SnoopyStyle15 July 2016
Mike Gambril (Warren Beatty) is a playboy former NFL quarterback. His agent Kip DeMay (Garry Shandling) is overjoyed that he's engaged to talk show host Lynn Weaver worth $100 million. He's on a flight sitting next to singer Terry McKay (Annette Bening) to Sydney. The plane is forced to land on Cook Island in a storm. They take a cruise ship to Tahiti where they visit his elderly aunt Ginny (Katharine Hepburn). They agree to meet on top of Empire State Building upon returning. She breaks up with her fiancé Ken Allen (Pierce Brosnan) and he breaks up with Lynn but the meeting does not go off as planned.

This is a remake of the 1939 classic. There is something odd about a remake of a classic that is ringing so many of the same bells. It feels like a checklist. As for the romance, that too feels familiar. Bugsy was three years prior. None of this movie feels fresh. It's a faded copy of an icon.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
To Love...
mnpdg24 October 2005
Beautiful film with great actors. Very moving, emotional and touching! Shows that everyone can change. Apparently, Beatty's life changed meeting Annette - in the film too. Katherine Hepburn is fantastic, a great actress and a great woman. Love Affair is not just about a love affair, it is a love story, a great love that changes your life, an unconditional unselfish love that puts the other first. It truly is a wonderful love story that has the moves, the light, the emotion, the music... "I love watching you move" - just one of the great lines that don't go away and become part of our own lines! I have watched it over and over and every single time I feel the same emotions. The scenery is also wonderful from the beautiful island shoots to central park in autumn. 10/10 easily...
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite impressive
calvertfan2 December 2002
As a big devotee of the original 'Love Affair' I recorded this one mainly out of morbid curiosity, with the intention of pulling it to pieces once I was done. I have *never* seen a good remake of a classic film (Sweet November anyone? *throws up*) but I must say, grudgingly, this one was good. Not great, not a patch on the original, but good nontheless, and worth seeing at least once. Possibly the best thing is that in remaking it, they simply re-cast the film, changed only a few minor details, managed to keep all of the good scenes intact, and did not need to throw in a lot of sex. For a change. And so, that rates it a few more points from me, because there's honestly nothing worse than remaking a classic and throwing in lots of sex, when the original did perfectly fine without it. This 'Love Affair' was in that respect definitely more mature than many recent films. It's a simple delight for everyone of all ages and in another fifty years I wouldn't mind calling this one a classic.

Well, that might be pushing it a little.

Katharine Hepburn was brilliant as always and although I've never seen Beatty or Bening before in any films, I can't find anything wrong in their casting (thank god it wasn't Adam Sandler or Keanu!). Beatty is of course no Boyer or Cary Grant but he handled the closing scene superbly, and I must say if anything of Bening's ever pops up on tv again, I might give it a look. She has to be a pretty good actress for me to stop glaring at her because she's not Irene Dunne! And I liked the scene where she was singing the Beatles' song as well, there should have been a full performance of that.

I'd give this a 7/10, because I can't help but compare it to the original. I would say to watch it because I liked it, but only if you watch the original first! And that's an order.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A poor remake that bombed big time
SimonJack25 June 2021
Except for those who may be starved for anything that might seem romantic in modern times, this film will mostly be a turn-off. Even for movie fans who haven't seen the original "Love Affair" of 1939, or the smashing 1957 remake, "An Affair to Remember," this 1994 "Love Affair" will seem just too improbable and contrived. And poorly acted. Of course, the love-starved may still eke some enjoyment or pleasure out of it.

The love story in each of the first two films was based on a story by Leo McCarey that he also directed. It had a wonderful mix of light humor and romance. In both films, the affairs developed gradually from romance into deep love. And, both films had the casts that could carry it off wonderfully. This film lacks that spontaneous humor. And, even stretching it out with the longest flight possible - to Australia, it still is too far beyond belief for a real love to develop in such a short time. While Beatty, Bening and others of the cast are good actors, they don't mesh here as a real love.

As for Katherine Hepburn's role as the grandmother, her character may be okay with the rest of this film and its roles. But it can't hold a candle to the warm, wise and lovely gentle characters played in the first two films by Maria Ouspenskaya and Cathleen Nesbitt. Finally, the music in this remake is way off target. It not only can't compare to the quality of the first two films, but it seems harsh at times, and a poor background for a love story. Then, again, it matches this plot and screenplay.

This film bombed at the box office - with just $18 million in ticket sales against a budget of $60 million. It really "deserves" its Razzie award as the worst remake. And, it surely is that bad as a love story.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Still A Star Crossed Story
bkoganbing14 May 2010
If anyone thinks that we've seen the last remake of Love Affair, think again. The Indian cinema has done a version of it a few years after this film came out. This story has a timeless appeal that Warren Beatty certainly recognized.

Anyone who has seen the original Love Affair and the remake An Affair To Remember will know the plot of this film exactly. Warren Beatty and Annette Bening fill the shoes of previous lovers Charles Boyer and Irene Dunne and Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr. With very few deviations except those to update the story this film has the same plot.

One of those deviations has our star crossed lovers Warren Beatty and Annette Bening meeting on a transoceanic flight to Sydney, Australia which is certainly a lot of time to get acquainted. They get even better acquainted when they are forced to land on a Pacific island where Beatty's grandmother Katharine Hepburn has a nice tropical place. The kind of setting where romance has to bloom.

This was Katharine Hepburn's last big screen appearance, she did one more television film and then her Parkinson's Disease and other ailments that beset people of the age she lived to forced her retirement. I'll bet she never thought she would in 1939 wind up in a remake of a film doing a part Maria Ouspenskaya created. She does it grand style though and only Kate can make an old Anglo-Saxon expletive sound elegant.

That Warren Beatty got nominated for a Razzie award for remaking Love Affair is a disgrace. This is old fashioned romantic entertainment, the kind that old Hollywood used to do. I think Beatty and everyone connected with this Love Affair should be proud.

I notice that Leo McCarey who wrote and directed Love Affair and An Affair To Remember is prominently listed on the screen credits. He'd be proud of this remake himself, I'm sure.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sweet & touching love story...
dwpollar17 February 2002
1st watched 2/17/2002 - 7 out of 10(Dir-Glenn Gordon Caron): Sweet & touching love story with wonderfully giddy performances from the main stars(Beatty & Bening). Despite obvious checkered pasts in the romance department this "love affair" is played out with a sense of purity and warmth that neither of them seemed to have in their prior relationships. I think this bonded them together(in their hearts) till the inevitable reuniting. Wonderful movie for Valentines day with a sweetheart with nice open-ended finally.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Third Time's "Almost" The Charm.
happipuppi1324 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
People that know the 2 movies "An Affair To Remember" and the re-make before this one also called "Love Affair",pretty much know what the movie is about and what to expect.

After viewing it all, I can honestly say that this re-make was not really done as well as it could have been. I'm not saying it suffers the same fate of Striesand's remake of "A Star Is Born" (also a third go-round) but for all intentional purposes, it's just okay and a bit bland.

I know Warren Beatty is a good actor and so is Annette Bening but there's not a full dramatic feeling in their parts for my taste.

Even after her character is hurt and can't walk, you just don't feel that sense of urgency about these two. Which makes it very hard to care what happens to them.

I was far more moved by Aunt Ginny's passing than anything else.

Speaking of her : Like many have stated here though, Katharine Hepburn's part really should have been written so she could at least have been in the film for an hour.

I also wish she hadn't been made to use a certain 4 letter word also, unnecessary. In all, it's okay and it's story and how it is acted is good as well. It is worth it for the few minutes we share with Hepburn

Six stars, for simply a watchable enough film and of course, for Kate.

She was always the bright spot in any film, good or bad. (END)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
piece of crap
emisue0216 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Possible Spoilers Ahead (though if you've seen either the original "Love Affair" or "An Affair to Remember", the only spoiler is this entire movie). Okay, this movie was terrible. People don't fall in love by having incredibly inciteful conversations on a plane upon their first meeting. Even Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr started with just some minor flirtations without completely psychoanalyzing each other. (I'll make all my comparisons to "An Affair to Remember" since I haven't seen the original "Love Affair".) This movie just tries too hard. Characters, just like real people, can develop a deep relationship without saying deep things right off the bat. Warren Beaty and Annette Bening's chemistry was zilch, especially when compaired to Kerr and Grant, who's chemistry was some of the best I've ever seen on film. Even Katharine Hepburn, whom I adore, wasn't up to her usual standard. She didn't come across as sweet and as inviting as the grandmother of "An Affair to Remember", and I know for a fact that she doesn't play the piano (see "Song of Love" for further proof), while her predicessor at least made an effort. Nothing in the movie is as good as the original-I could rip apart every little moment if you want, but I do have something resembling a life. I realize that "Remember" was a remake itself, but I don't think I would have liked this movie even if I hadn't fallen in love with "Remember". These two characters don't ever seem to fall for anything more than the pseudo-deep conversation on the plane and physical attraction, whereas Kerr and Grant talk about their lives and interests. How many times throughout their film does one say "What were you saying?" when the other said nothing, and the first one then proceeds to say exactly what they were thinking? Quite a few, for those not fortunate enough to have seen it yet. That's a connection, not Beatty gazing drunkenly at Benning across the table. As for the music everyone raves about, "Remember" had a beautiful theme song, complete with vocals, that was weaved throughout the film. This theme song sounded so close that I kept trying to sing "Remember's" lyrics to it and always fell short. That was distracting, not beautiful. Watch "An Affair to Remember" instead, PLEASE.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
refreshing
bws04225713 February 2005
this movie has many of the shortcomings of the 1957 remake...the script is weak and the acting is lacking...but unlike 'an affair to remember', there is much to redeem this movie...

first, the music gives it a definite shot in the arm...second, there is the scenery which appears to be shot on location and is strikingly beautiful in some cases..third, there is Katherine Hepburn who is masterful in a very brief appearance...fourth, the comedy works...Shandling and Ramis are great additions, and Beatty plays the his role with humorous undertones throughout the movie...finally, Benning is cute, beautiful, and elegant...

for me, there is no comparison between this and other versions..this is head and shoulders about the rest...
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Third (and worst) version of romantic story which goes back to 1939...
moonspinner557 October 2006
Love at First Sight--in Designer Sunglasses. Real-life couple Warren Beatty and Annette Bening are the star-crossed lovers in this remake of 1939's "Love Affair", which in turn was remade as "An Affair to Remember" in 1957. It's a gauzy, soft-focus, soft-headed confection about a playboy who becomes smitten with an attractive woman while on his way to marry somebody else; she's also otherwise engaged, and their on-again/off-again relationship has the same old-fashioned complications as the other versions of this highly-concocted plot. The material is really only as good as the actors selling it, and Beatty and Bening are certainly a striking twosome. Unfortunately, they don't seem to have noticed that 37 years have passed since this tale had some merit, and the results are distinctly musty. Overall, there's not enough energy in the direction nor heart in the general handling to make this a memorable 'Affair'. *1/2 from ****
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Does this remake somehow justify its existence?
planktonrules2 March 2023
Too often, movies are remade by Hollywood and the result is terribly predictable and offers nothing over the original. That being said, sometimes a remake is different enough or corrects flaws in the original film...and perhaps "Love Affair" is one of these remakes....perhaps. It's based on the famous 1937 film with Charles Boyer as well as its 1957 remake with Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr ("An Affair to Remember"). Oddly, the 50s film is more popular...mostly, I assume, because it was talked about so much in "Sleepless in Seattle". But, despite this, the '37 film is clearly the better version. But what about this 1994 film?

The plot is pretty much the same as other versions, though the setting is quite different. In this version, Mike and Terry (Warren Beatty and Annette Benning) are on a flight across the Pacific when the plane crash lands on a VERY isolated island in the Cook Islands. The pair are engaged to others but soon fall for each other. The plan is, if they STILL want to make a go of it, is to meet weeks later at the Empire State Building. And, if either doesn't show, it means they've decided to marry their respective fiancés and go on with their lives. Of course, complications arise when Terry is hit by a car on the way to their rendezvous.

To me, the main way this film differs from other version is the energy level. It just seems slower and the acting more restrained than other versions. This doesn't mean it's bad...just different in this way. But the basic story is the same and for me, it's very good BUT pretty much unnecessary to watch if you've seen the other films. Not bad at all...just nothing special. I do think it's a bit better than the 1957 film (which was glossy but a bit dull) but simply lacks the originality and wonderfulness of the first film.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
a dud
chaud_lapin23 February 2005
Despite all the great talent corralled together for this film, it is a resounding dud. Warren Beatty tries to be another Cary Grant but he just doesn't have the latter's charm, elegance, and class. Annette Benning is affecting, but together the two don't put much passion or urgency in their supposedly torrid affair. About the only reason to watch this movie is to catch a brief glimpse of 86 year-old Katharine Hepburn, and this is hardly her best work. Aficionados of this genre would be better of tracking down the film on which it was based, "An Affair to Remember" (1957), with Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr, itself a Technicolor remake of the black-and-white "Love Affair" (1939).
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Give this a chance...
MarieGabrielle29 November 2007
If you know the story, and have seen the earlier versions, this is still worth a viewing. The current drama/romance genre is something I am not often fond of, yet this film had a resonance, especially for the holiday season.

No, it is not the same as the Deborah Kerr, Cary Grant version, but that is a bit dated. There is a cameo scene with Katharine Hepburn, she as Beatty's great- aunt, he as someone at a crossroads in his life; wondering if there will be a turning point. Bening is a singer/actress, they agree to meet in NY, a year after if neither is attached to their current significant other. Beatty and Bening actually make a nice couple, for me to have enjoyed this film at Christmas, points to the fact that it is not another romantic comedy we can toss out ( a rare thing) probably because Beatty and Bening have a believable chemistry together.

The final scene, sad as it is Christmas, and the children singing a version of the Beatles' "I will" is atmospheric. It was (for me anyway ) a more moving scene than the older version, perhaps because the children singing in the 1950's version- were singing a song from that 1950's time period....

Highly recommended. 8/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much better aged 30 years later
susanleslie27 April 2024
I didn't remember this film being so well made when I first viewed it back in 1994. I think it's aged well 30 years later. Some of that is due to a wonderful cast of actors, (some no longer with us); Many welcomed faces: Garry Shandling, Brenda Vaccaro, Paul Mazursky, Pierce Brosnan, Harold Ramis.

Also the cinematography is much better than I remembered; Katharine Hepburn's brief but key performance is excellent. Young Annette Bening's beauty and grace is matched with her engaging performance.

Warren Beatty is good, but I think he's too old for this role, sad to say. The Warren Beatty of Heaven Can Wait would have been more age appropriate for this character. He doesn't ruin the film--he just doesn't enhance it.

Do I believe this love story? Well yes, 30 years later: it's Bening and Beatty.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disappointed
julietgibbes14 October 2013
You can't help but compare this to An Affair to Remember, whether you've seen the original Love Affair, or not.

The cinematography of this film is very dated, unfortunately during a period when there seemed to have been a 'darker the better' policy, even outdoors during daylight. In stark contrast to An Affair to Remember which was always bright enough to see the scene.

Grant and Kerr are a more believable couple than Beatty and Bening, ironically. Bening's affection for her character's friend (Meg Ryan) in the Women was more obvious than her love for Beatty's character in this movie.

Maybe Beatty's inadequacies were just more obvious next to the brilliance of Katherine Hepburn, but his character's love of his aged relative was not obvious at all.

Thinking back on the movie 24 hours after seeing it for the first time, I can't think of any reason why I'd recommend it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A true love affair between two great actors
michaelzstuff30 March 2002
They did it both on and off the screen and it was as exciting to watch these two great actors fall in love both on and off the screen. Also, a great performance by one of the leading ladies of our time, Kate Hepburn. Loved this movie!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great ending redeems sluggish first half.
Anth-M14 November 2007
This version of Love Affair (made for the third time) is a film that suffers from a sluggish first half while trying to achieve its goal of having its main characters fall in love. To aide this goal, the characters played by Warren Beatty and Annette Bening take an excursion to a remote Pacific Ocean island to visit the Katharine Hepburn character, a plot point too transparent and contrived to truly be effective. Still, the film manages to redeem itself in the third act with subtle yet powerful drama. The acting is fine, particularly Annette Bening but both she and Warren Beatty shine in the final, heart-wrenching scene.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An empty remake that fails on almost all fronts
drhoffman-8581517 January 2021
Granted, I never saw the original "An Affair to Remember." Still I was hoping for an enjoyable and love story; I left disappointed. This was just an overall bland and uninteresting film. It felt forced, weak, lame and contrived. I didn't care about either of the main characters in this movie. For one, Warren Beatty was totally unconvincing as a former football player. The manufactured chemistry between Beatty and Bening was not believable. There was no "there there." I didn't see the connection and what made them fall in love. They went from sharing a fleeting moment on the cruise ship, to her accompanying him to see his aunt who just so happened to live on a nearby island - and that scene between Katherine Hepburn and Bening's character was just awkward - to them going back to the cruise ship and suddenly starting a "love affair." No character development and no depth. This movie was a waste of talent = Pierce Brosnan, for one. He's a fine actor who was totally wasted in this plot. They did not give any explanation or background as to why his relationship with Terry (Bening) did not work. The same was true of Kate Capshaw's character who we never really got to know. This was a very poorly-written film. The second half was slightly better than the first but it's hardly redeeming as the bar was set very low. I think the only two good things I can say about this movie was that Annette Bening looked gorgeous and the score was beautiful. Other than that, don't waste your time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed