I really love this programme from Series 1 to 8. Then for 9-10 it just seemed to lose its soul and its way. They should have stopped it after Ros died.
i really hated the way the made Richard Armitages character so ambivalent, ambiguous, traumatised, and confused. The guy should have been in a loony bin, not in charge of section D.
How is Spooks MI5 supposed to manage the 1001 threats to NatSecurity when its head of operations is running around with his own aghenda(s)?
In fact IMHO Series 9 was almost entirely about Richard Armitage's Lucas North, and hardly at all about the plots and story lines It just got ridiculous in the end.
Then Series 10 was just plain...dire. I'm struggling to get through it.
After Series 8 I just couldn't empathise with any of the characters. Harry and Ruth were constantly 'on and off'. When Lucas North finally died i almost cheered! That's how far Spooks had descended into a confused mess.
I shall remember Spooks from series 1-8 with fondness, and maybe get te DVDs in. The rest I shall ignore. I give it 10/10 for 1-8. Then a 3 or 4 for 9-10. So 8 as a compromise.
135 Reviews
Spooks: The deterioration of a great show
JSC-225 August 2008
The early seasons of Spooks, a well-produced BBC action-drama about a small band of MI-5 agents serving to protect the UK, provided compelling entertainment. Giving the writers some latitude in developing plots that had the same team of MI-5 saving Britain each week from a variety of home grown and foreign militants, the show had excellent production values, good story lines and developed the characters' background to help create audience empathy. Led by Matthew Macfadyen and Peter Firth, the actors had good chemistry and, occasionally, the plot raised interesting questions about the dilemmas faced by domestic intelligence agencies.
In later seasons, however, notably five and six, and integrity of Spooks seriously deteriorated, as the quality of the plot became ridiculous, and then absurd. Life-long conspiracy theorists would have had a good laugh and Spooks adopted repetitive themes of general xenophobia, targeting particularly the United States, but also generally simplistic conspiracy themes within most of the UK Government (virtually everyone except our intrepid MI-5 team). Simultaneously, the show forgot to focus on the individual characters, providing two- dimensional studies of the new MI-5 players, with the exception of Adam (Rupert Penry- Jones), who carried the brunt of providing some unsophisticated examples of conflict. As a result, it became more difficult to care about the fate of the team, or of the country, the supposed threats so outlandish it may as well have been science fiction.
It is a shame, because obviously there is an audience for this type of show, and a basic idea that would be engrossing. If only it felt a little factual.
In later seasons, however, notably five and six, and integrity of Spooks seriously deteriorated, as the quality of the plot became ridiculous, and then absurd. Life-long conspiracy theorists would have had a good laugh and Spooks adopted repetitive themes of general xenophobia, targeting particularly the United States, but also generally simplistic conspiracy themes within most of the UK Government (virtually everyone except our intrepid MI-5 team). Simultaneously, the show forgot to focus on the individual characters, providing two- dimensional studies of the new MI-5 players, with the exception of Adam (Rupert Penry- Jones), who carried the brunt of providing some unsophisticated examples of conflict. As a result, it became more difficult to care about the fate of the team, or of the country, the supposed threats so outlandish it may as well have been science fiction.
It is a shame, because obviously there is an audience for this type of show, and a basic idea that would be engrossing. If only it felt a little factual.
Fun, stylish and paranoid.
timotheus19 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Caught the series 7 (dealing with FSB and traitors). Professionally done, nicely played, sloppily written - still a lot of fun to watch. A network of sleeper agents in Britain, heavily armed Russians in London hunting MI5 operatives in the streets of the capital - if you, like me, remember the ages of the Cold War - this will be a interesting experience. The story of the season's finale is not original: it reminds the 1977 Don Siegel's Telefon with Charles Bronson (without the mind control, mind that). However horribly inept Russians with golden crucifixes speaking horrible Russian wanting to destroy England aplenty! If you catch it on the telly - do not miss.
Best show on television
djames4225 June 2006
Just finished the last episode of series three, and was reminded why this is my favourite show of all time. I think the comparisons to 24 are quite unfair--they both deal with terrorism, but the similarities end there. Spooks is far more cerebral, and spends more effort on character and plot development.
Unlike other reviewers, I felt series three was every bit as good (and in many ways even better) than the previous two. The departure of several main characters was handled exceedingly well, and while they'll be missed, I think their replacements are quite strong and as such, the transition has been quite smooth. Kudos! (Er, no pun intended)
Unlike other reviewers, I felt series three was every bit as good (and in many ways even better) than the previous two. The departure of several main characters was handled exceedingly well, and while they'll be missed, I think their replacements are quite strong and as such, the transition has been quite smooth. Kudos! (Er, no pun intended)
One of the best things on British TV
The Horseman20 May 2002
Spooks, is quite frankly, bloody excellent. It seems to have learnt all the tricks that the best of American thrillers (e.g. '24') have picked up, and uses them to the best of their abilities. The acting, especially from McFadden, is likewise excellent (unlike many other similar programs, Spooks doesn't attempt to make the characters whiter-than-white. They're likeable, just not perfect). It also has the bravery to use storylines that are shocking, but are what make it the best.
My only criticism is that the characters from 'the government' are a bit too stereotypically slimey.
Otherwise 10 out of 10
Mondays, 9:00pm, BBC 1
My only criticism is that the characters from 'the government' are a bit too stereotypically slimey.
Otherwise 10 out of 10
Mondays, 9:00pm, BBC 1
Brilliant series
mccarthydeborah5 November 2021
From Across The Pond
lbeatles55111 July 2006
I've been hooked and reeled. I absolutely love MI-5/Spooks. I rented all the available series and I crave for more. I'm anxiously waiting for 2005 to become available. The characters are unique and intriguing. The story lines are complex and luring. The acting is top form. As far as I'm concerned nothing here in the U.S. comes close. We had Mission Impossible (covert missions and fancy gadgetry) but MI-5 is fathoms richer, and smart. I'm a loyal fan of Keeley Hawes first finding her in Tipping the Velvet and recently viewed Our Mutual Friend. She's an outstanding actress and her MI-5 colleagues perform with such command of the art. As far as I'm concerned the BBC can do no wrong.
British Television at its Best
evelyn_emslie23 January 2008
Truly a riveting show. It is not at all like its American counterparts in the sense that one has to pay close attention to the dialog of the show with its witty and often intellectual remarks.
One feels a true sense of realism watching spooks. The characters are real people with real faults. Another aspect I enjoy is the fact that there is no fear in "killing" a character off. One might consider that to be cruel but it once again lends to the realism of the show.
If you are looking to watch something to simulate the mind get the heart racing, anger, fear hope and justice watch Spooks it is in a class of its own as only the British can do.
One feels a true sense of realism watching spooks. The characters are real people with real faults. Another aspect I enjoy is the fact that there is no fear in "killing" a character off. One might consider that to be cruel but it once again lends to the realism of the show.
If you are looking to watch something to simulate the mind get the heart racing, anger, fear hope and justice watch Spooks it is in a class of its own as only the British can do.
Great show
Thorsten-Krings6 March 2007
Spooks is certainly one of the best shows ever made for TV. One of the reasons is the basic principle that nothing is clear cut black and white but that every single character really is very ambivalent. So on the one hand there are "heroes" (otherwise it would be boring) but on the other hand the role of the security services is not glorified. That intelligent outlook makes is good watching. Apart from that the story lines are on the one hand believable (I wouldn't go as far as to say realistic as the show keeps the number of people involved in any given case to an unrealistically low number and the cases happen one after the other) but also original. The standard of writing is very high and the authors stay clear of spy story stereotypes. There really are no flat characters in this show which makes it really delightful and no character is safe which adds to the suspense. In season three basically all three main characters which did carry the show over a number of years disappear. It is done again in a believable way and the three new characters give the show a new (although not necessarily better or worse) dimension by their MI 6 past in the middle east and the addition of a husband/ wife team. And again, the Thin Man stereotype is avoided. Personally I preferred the McFadyen character because he was less of a stereotype (essentially he was really uncool) as Penry-Jones's who acts against his posterboy image. He is a great actor but his looks really are in the way of being taken seriously. But you can't blame him for that. Generally speaking I find it amazing that they manage to tell an exciting, multi layered and ultimately satisfying story in the 60 minutes format. Spooks is also one of the few TV shows that's visually innovative.
Very Realistic and very scary spooks is the best show the UK have produced
vhs19997 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I have been watching spooks ever since it has been broadcast here in Australia. Spooks is very realistic and follows story lines that are real close to real world events. Over the past four seasons spooks has gone through many changes and has in season 3 lost there three main leads Tom,Zoe,Danny and replaced by Adam,Ros,Zaf who still make the show just as exciting more to the point realistic and serious. These episodes are very Controversial and have got a lot of suspense but if you are looking for excitement suspense and even some character based plots well you have come to the right place,good choice of show. i would just like to say keep it up england your doing a great job.
Oh and by the way if you want something up to date to a real world event try episodes 4.01 4.02 in season 4 they were based on the London bombings.
Oh and by the way if you want something up to date to a real world event try episodes 4.01 4.02 in season 4 they were based on the London bombings.
decent British spy thriller
ivko3 April 2011
Entertaining show about the British security service MI-5 with a writing and editing style similar to '24', but typically with one or two episode story arcs instead of season long plots. The characters are well created and nicely fleshed out with skills and personal foibles, but do seem to have disturbingly short lifespans. Politics in the show are rather conservative at the beginning of the series (which started shortly after 9/11), but gradually begin to include a lot of lefty 'new world order' conspiracy stuff as the show progresses and the Iraq war became increasingly unpopular around the world. Like all shows of this type, it portrays England as having a shockingly high rate of terrorist attacks and far too many caches of surface to air missiles floating around inside it's borders.
While the action and spy craft is usually entertaining, it does tend towards the silly on many occasions. Weaker plots include elements like a small child with a laptop defeating the entire British intelligence computer network and the "G&J" algorithm (an extremely loose and poorly understood reference to RSA style encryption used on the Internet) security loophole that allows a villain to access any computer on the Internet, but who for some completely incomprehensible reason uses it to attempt to ransom the government instead of just tapping directly into banks to take the funds. Occasionally the logic is so tortured it becomes unintentionally funny, as in one season (spoiler alert) where a group of individuals attempt a coup of the British government. During the course of the coup they kill several people including an MI-5 officer, arrange to have hundreds of people killed in a staged terrorist attack, organize the slaughter of peaceful protesters by police forces, attempt the assassination of several high-ranking government officials and the Prime Ministers own son, and create detention camps where they round up political opponents and try to set them on fire. After the good guys finally stop the plot, one of the conspirators (that's right, just one) is brought to trial and convicted. The daughter and one-time co- conspirator of the convicted man, now amazingly added to the MI-5 payroll because she had an eleventh hour change of heart, has a heated exchange with her boss because her father received 20 years in prison and she felt he should only get 5. I laughed so hard I was crying. I don't know if this is a British thing I don't get, but over here we would say that mothf***er has got to go. Apparently in Britain trying to overthrow the government is seen as more of a stern talking-to kind of thing.
One quick not for those living in the states; it bears mentioning that the show has a strong anti-American sentiment that usually colors us as either arrogant jerks, soulless corporate overlords, or weapon merchants eager to sell biological weapons to foreign leaders for all their ethnic cleansing needs. Having seen other Canadian and British shows I've become de-sensitized to this so it didn't bother me overly much. I figure we made them the emperor's lackeys in Star Wars so turnabout is fair play.
All in all this is a decent bit of action-drama. When it works it works really well, which I'd say happens about 70% of the time. The other 30% fails pretty spectacularly, but still I would say overall it's worthy of providing a few hours of diversion.
While the action and spy craft is usually entertaining, it does tend towards the silly on many occasions. Weaker plots include elements like a small child with a laptop defeating the entire British intelligence computer network and the "G&J" algorithm (an extremely loose and poorly understood reference to RSA style encryption used on the Internet) security loophole that allows a villain to access any computer on the Internet, but who for some completely incomprehensible reason uses it to attempt to ransom the government instead of just tapping directly into banks to take the funds. Occasionally the logic is so tortured it becomes unintentionally funny, as in one season (spoiler alert) where a group of individuals attempt a coup of the British government. During the course of the coup they kill several people including an MI-5 officer, arrange to have hundreds of people killed in a staged terrorist attack, organize the slaughter of peaceful protesters by police forces, attempt the assassination of several high-ranking government officials and the Prime Ministers own son, and create detention camps where they round up political opponents and try to set them on fire. After the good guys finally stop the plot, one of the conspirators (that's right, just one) is brought to trial and convicted. The daughter and one-time co- conspirator of the convicted man, now amazingly added to the MI-5 payroll because she had an eleventh hour change of heart, has a heated exchange with her boss because her father received 20 years in prison and she felt he should only get 5. I laughed so hard I was crying. I don't know if this is a British thing I don't get, but over here we would say that mothf***er has got to go. Apparently in Britain trying to overthrow the government is seen as more of a stern talking-to kind of thing.
One quick not for those living in the states; it bears mentioning that the show has a strong anti-American sentiment that usually colors us as either arrogant jerks, soulless corporate overlords, or weapon merchants eager to sell biological weapons to foreign leaders for all their ethnic cleansing needs. Having seen other Canadian and British shows I've become de-sensitized to this so it didn't bother me overly much. I figure we made them the emperor's lackeys in Star Wars so turnabout is fair play.
All in all this is a decent bit of action-drama. When it works it works really well, which I'd say happens about 70% of the time. The other 30% fails pretty spectacularly, but still I would say overall it's worthy of providing a few hours of diversion.
BBC at its best
csm-7811927 June 2020
At times this is very silly but overall it's a top notch drama and looking back on it now one can see how it anticipated real world issues before they hit the headlines. It's at its best in the superb first two seasons with Matthew Macfayden and Keeley Hawes. Peter Firth is outstanding throughout.
Loved the first couple of season, went downhill quick...
angedv21 January 2014
This show started out great. It was a mix of short-lived series Rubicon with the action of a Born movie. I was in heaven. It came to a screeching halt after the first two seasons. I just didn't have the same connection with the characters.
And what I took as anti-American sentiment was too much. I've made it through six seasons and will update my review if 1) I make it through more seasons and 2) They improve.
Sad because this had the potential to be a new favorite. It is still watchable and better than average, just don't expect the excitement of finding a new, great show to last.
And what I took as anti-American sentiment was too much. I've made it through six seasons and will update my review if 1) I make it through more seasons and 2) They improve.
Sad because this had the potential to be a new favorite. It is still watchable and better than average, just don't expect the excitement of finding a new, great show to last.
scary
spkelsekladden24 June 2012
When i watched the first episode of the first season, i thought this was brilliant.But after watching half of season two I'm just bored. If this is how the real MI5 is run i would be seriously worried. They act like bloody fools. The show has been compared to the American 24 I'm not sure if thats is a good thing or a bad.
They fumble around they seem to take a lot of unnecessary risks and every episode always ended with a huge anticlimax. They could have done with some more action in the show. They build up so you sit and Wait for something exciting to happen,than it all just flattens out to nothing but some small talk and a pat on the back
They fumble around they seem to take a lot of unnecessary risks and every episode always ended with a huge anticlimax. They could have done with some more action in the show. They build up so you sit and Wait for something exciting to happen,than it all just flattens out to nothing but some small talk and a pat on the back
`Spooks' delivers....
prose15 August 2003
I read all the hype in advance of this program being shown on ABC-TV in Australia, and thought: yeah, yeah, show me something different. Maybe it's not too different, but it does deliver. I was a bit bored inititally by the straight delivery of MI-5 characters, and how terribly seriously they take their jobs. Matthew MacFadyen is a fine choice for Tom Quinn - he's big and tall, straight-faced, and very, very serious. Keeley Hawes is also very well cast, and eminently believable.
However the last two episodes shown here - the one about the mock terrorist attack, and last night's episode about the visit of the American presidential `circus' were rivetting stuff. I found myself holding my breath for a lot longer than was healthy for me! I was fascinated by how the US presidential entourage insisted they take over MI-5 files for `security purposes'. A metaphor for the world at the moment?? The suspicion that George Bush Jnr was visiting London specifically for a secret meeting with Colonel Gadaffi to negotiate compensation for Locharbie losses was very pertinent, given that Libya came forth with compensation - in the `real' world - just this week.
I look forward to more episodes of this straighter-than-straight, larger-than-life, but very entertaining series. I don't think it's very realistic, but then, who watches TV to indulge in more reality?
However the last two episodes shown here - the one about the mock terrorist attack, and last night's episode about the visit of the American presidential `circus' were rivetting stuff. I found myself holding my breath for a lot longer than was healthy for me! I was fascinated by how the US presidential entourage insisted they take over MI-5 files for `security purposes'. A metaphor for the world at the moment?? The suspicion that George Bush Jnr was visiting London specifically for a secret meeting with Colonel Gadaffi to negotiate compensation for Locharbie losses was very pertinent, given that Libya came forth with compensation - in the `real' world - just this week.
I look forward to more episodes of this straighter-than-straight, larger-than-life, but very entertaining series. I don't think it's very realistic, but then, who watches TV to indulge in more reality?
Best Spy Series Since the Prisoner
chuckewe5 June 2006
Rarely do I find DVD's of Broadcast TV worthy of the expense. MI5 or Spooks is one of the rare exceptions. As an American, I've been limited to the A&E versions, which has others have stated, are edited to allow for commercials. The pace, the actors, the plots even in the edited versions are exceptional. When I found out I could purchase the series on DVD, I gladly did. The only other Broadcast series I've purchased for myself, are Secret Agent Man (danger man in the UK) The Prisoner, and the Hornblower series. I've been pleased with all. The bonus with MI5 is seeing the full episodes. Unlike American series, the UK series have short seasons which keep the story lines clear, concise, intelligent, and plot driven not profit driven. The actors are generally given fleshier roles and unlike many U.S. shows, the actors seem to be chosen on talent, rather then a "look". MI5 brings a sense of what it may really be like in the intelligent community, as a clear delineations of right and wrong crosses paths with politics, ambition, and geo-political idealogy. In short, MI5 raises many morality issues while at the same time, filling one with suspense.
Suspenseful and smart...
solpsizm14 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
If I could give this a 7.5 I would, but sans .5s I'll give it an 8 because when this series was good it was really good.
For those of us in the states whose main exposure to espionage thrillers was 24, this series is different from that in 2 main ways: 1) the series doesn't revolve around one main character and so main characters do die and 2) the production values/budgets are not as high as 24, especially in the first few seasons, so as sometimes is the case suspense is generated in MI-5 in ways that derive more from actual espionage and cat and mouse games than gun battles or high-tech surveillance.
At least in the first few seasons, which may be difficult for viewers accustomed to fast, perfectly synchronized and action packed 24 type entertainment. (Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of 24, especially the first 3 seasons, but after 9 seasons of one character having literally a 100 lives, one need something a bit more close to reality). Guns are used by the main characters only with absolute necessity, and I don't think they ever used anything above handguns. As the seasons progress though, this series incorporates more and more elements from a 24 template, from a more frenetic pace, prevalence of guns and especially bombs, explosions and big set-pieces, to stories that incorporate conspiracies within conspiracies. although thankfully the number of arcs dealing with corporations pulling the main strings were limited.
The greatest source of suspense in this series is the fact that save for the possible exception of Harry Pearce, no character is safe from exile or death (mostly the latter). Because this series, at least for the majority of the first 8 seasons, is procedural, this is even more important, for in any one shot episode featuring a villain who will not appear again, almost any character can be killed or forced to leave MI-5.
Not that this is a character-centered suspense series. Althoughh we get glimpses into the main characters personal lives for the first 8 seasons, for the most part the characters are seen only as in their importance as officers of MI-5. And the guest characters, mainly villains, are not portrayed as either instanly sympathetic or villainous, but mostly a combination of both. The lack of over-sentimentality is often seen in the officers' use of assets, ie. people who can serve the successful completion of their mission. They are often used and discarded by the MI-5 officers, often with minimal remorse.
Around seasons 5, 6 and 7, this series becomes an amalgalm of its first 3 seasons and a 24 type entertainment. It is here that this series is at its best, where big set-pieces and vast but compelling conspiracies combined with the fact that we know any character can die at any moment create cool and satisfying suspense.
2 things to note: 1) there is a heavy anti-American theme throughout the series that permeates even to the horrific and cringeworthy American accents employed by the English actors. (but to be fair, no one from the Russians to the own British government is safe from being villainous as well). 2) Seasons 9 and 10 are atrocious. Unnecessary and ridiculous backstories are created for the 2 most likable characters simply to generate shock value, and characters are made to do preposterous actions that make no sense either in their character arc or by logic. Despite this, this series overall is very entertaining, especially in its middle seasons, and is well worth a watch for anyone craving smart suspense that is not overly contrived.
For those of us in the states whose main exposure to espionage thrillers was 24, this series is different from that in 2 main ways: 1) the series doesn't revolve around one main character and so main characters do die and 2) the production values/budgets are not as high as 24, especially in the first few seasons, so as sometimes is the case suspense is generated in MI-5 in ways that derive more from actual espionage and cat and mouse games than gun battles or high-tech surveillance.
At least in the first few seasons, which may be difficult for viewers accustomed to fast, perfectly synchronized and action packed 24 type entertainment. (Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of 24, especially the first 3 seasons, but after 9 seasons of one character having literally a 100 lives, one need something a bit more close to reality). Guns are used by the main characters only with absolute necessity, and I don't think they ever used anything above handguns. As the seasons progress though, this series incorporates more and more elements from a 24 template, from a more frenetic pace, prevalence of guns and especially bombs, explosions and big set-pieces, to stories that incorporate conspiracies within conspiracies. although thankfully the number of arcs dealing with corporations pulling the main strings were limited.
The greatest source of suspense in this series is the fact that save for the possible exception of Harry Pearce, no character is safe from exile or death (mostly the latter). Because this series, at least for the majority of the first 8 seasons, is procedural, this is even more important, for in any one shot episode featuring a villain who will not appear again, almost any character can be killed or forced to leave MI-5.
Not that this is a character-centered suspense series. Althoughh we get glimpses into the main characters personal lives for the first 8 seasons, for the most part the characters are seen only as in their importance as officers of MI-5. And the guest characters, mainly villains, are not portrayed as either instanly sympathetic or villainous, but mostly a combination of both. The lack of over-sentimentality is often seen in the officers' use of assets, ie. people who can serve the successful completion of their mission. They are often used and discarded by the MI-5 officers, often with minimal remorse.
Around seasons 5, 6 and 7, this series becomes an amalgalm of its first 3 seasons and a 24 type entertainment. It is here that this series is at its best, where big set-pieces and vast but compelling conspiracies combined with the fact that we know any character can die at any moment create cool and satisfying suspense.
2 things to note: 1) there is a heavy anti-American theme throughout the series that permeates even to the horrific and cringeworthy American accents employed by the English actors. (but to be fair, no one from the Russians to the own British government is safe from being villainous as well). 2) Seasons 9 and 10 are atrocious. Unnecessary and ridiculous backstories are created for the 2 most likable characters simply to generate shock value, and characters are made to do preposterous actions that make no sense either in their character arc or by logic. Despite this, this series overall is very entertaining, especially in its middle seasons, and is well worth a watch for anyone craving smart suspense that is not overly contrived.
A&E, Bring Back Spooks/MI-5!
rsampron16 August 2006
Some British crime dramas are so good you forget to breathe at times. That is the case with "Spooks", or as they called it when packaged for American TV, "MI-5".
We were introduced to some fantastic actors, tense scripts, rich characters, and harrowing images. There is a perpetual ethical struggle within and amongst the characters, as they search their way through the dark of the drugs trade, terrorism, and such.
I will never forget what I felt when watching a Muslim bomber preparing to blow-up innocent children in a playground.
Probably the best thing I could say is the program proved more than realistic; it was prophetic, given the events on 7/7/05.
That just shows the excellence of the program.
Sadly, we can no longer view it here in the states as A&E has pulled it. I am hoping they recirculate it to some of their other network channels, as they've done with "Midsomer Murder"s to the Biography Channel (honestly). Perhaps to BBC America?
We were introduced to some fantastic actors, tense scripts, rich characters, and harrowing images. There is a perpetual ethical struggle within and amongst the characters, as they search their way through the dark of the drugs trade, terrorism, and such.
I will never forget what I felt when watching a Muslim bomber preparing to blow-up innocent children in a playground.
Probably the best thing I could say is the program proved more than realistic; it was prophetic, given the events on 7/7/05.
That just shows the excellence of the program.
Sadly, we can no longer view it here in the states as A&E has pulled it. I am hoping they recirculate it to some of their other network channels, as they've done with "Midsomer Murder"s to the Biography Channel (honestly). Perhaps to BBC America?
Good show that has ruined itself in its third season!!!
jameslamont10 March 2005
Ever since Spooks hit the BBC back in 2002, it has been essential, innovative, superbly written and action packed drama. The first season of the show was exceptional, the show was so ground breaking in the stories and themes it tackled that it won many plaudits and won many prizes. But Seaon 3 of the show was rocked by the departure of its main stars and I will talk about that later, but first I will go over the show generally and the first two seasons particularly...
Tom Quinn (Matthew Macfayden) was the linchpin of the show and rightly so. He was an amazing character and Matthew was absolutely superb as the main star of the show. Keeley Hawes and David Oyelowo were great as Danny and Zoe as the other main cast members of the show. Peter Firth(Harry Pearce) put in a superb performance as the Spooks boss.
The biggest assets the show had was its main three characters and because they were so likable, the viewer really warmed to the characters and the actors themselves.
Never shy to stow away from controversy Season 2 of the show was also very good. The problem then came in Season 3.....
All 3 of the main characters left and there were these replacements bought in that were so obviously replacements for the others, that the viewer could not help but notice it. The sense of the closeness of the show was gone, as the show stopped focusing on the "bad guys", but started focusing solely on the Spooks private life.
One of the great things about the show was that the show dealt with a wide range of terrorism issues affecting mainland UK but in series 3, the writers were clearly more concerned with the Spooks personal lives, than the actual welfare of the country!! Maybe they should have ended the show after the second season and let the show go out on a high. There are so any stand alone memorable episodes in these two series, that you will remember them for ages. The problem was that the loss of the three main characters the audience had loved for the two previous series, had left and this has had a dramatic effect.
As for the replacements, Rupert Penry-Jones is not a patch on Matthew Macfayden and he is quite wooden at times. Olga Sosnovska is so-so as Fiona, Adams wife. They are the main replacements to the cast, but even the quite well written characters cannot help fill the void of the ex-characters departures.
I used to be a massive fan of this show and I would rate this show as one of the best on the box, and essential viewing but season 3 really let the show down. In my opinion a big part of the show was over when the main three characters left and the new replacements have not done much to change my mind. This is a prime example of a show that simply cannot survive without its main cast, there is just too much history wiped away. If you want to see a top class drama show buy Series 1 and 2 box sets, stick clear of Series 3. Good show (season 1-3) 10/10, Season 3 (4/10)
Tom Quinn (Matthew Macfayden) was the linchpin of the show and rightly so. He was an amazing character and Matthew was absolutely superb as the main star of the show. Keeley Hawes and David Oyelowo were great as Danny and Zoe as the other main cast members of the show. Peter Firth(Harry Pearce) put in a superb performance as the Spooks boss.
The biggest assets the show had was its main three characters and because they were so likable, the viewer really warmed to the characters and the actors themselves.
Never shy to stow away from controversy Season 2 of the show was also very good. The problem then came in Season 3.....
All 3 of the main characters left and there were these replacements bought in that were so obviously replacements for the others, that the viewer could not help but notice it. The sense of the closeness of the show was gone, as the show stopped focusing on the "bad guys", but started focusing solely on the Spooks private life.
One of the great things about the show was that the show dealt with a wide range of terrorism issues affecting mainland UK but in series 3, the writers were clearly more concerned with the Spooks personal lives, than the actual welfare of the country!! Maybe they should have ended the show after the second season and let the show go out on a high. There are so any stand alone memorable episodes in these two series, that you will remember them for ages. The problem was that the loss of the three main characters the audience had loved for the two previous series, had left and this has had a dramatic effect.
As for the replacements, Rupert Penry-Jones is not a patch on Matthew Macfayden and he is quite wooden at times. Olga Sosnovska is so-so as Fiona, Adams wife. They are the main replacements to the cast, but even the quite well written characters cannot help fill the void of the ex-characters departures.
I used to be a massive fan of this show and I would rate this show as one of the best on the box, and essential viewing but season 3 really let the show down. In my opinion a big part of the show was over when the main three characters left and the new replacements have not done much to change my mind. This is a prime example of a show that simply cannot survive without its main cast, there is just too much history wiped away. If you want to see a top class drama show buy Series 1 and 2 box sets, stick clear of Series 3. Good show (season 1-3) 10/10, Season 3 (4/10)
The Best Action Show on TV
DesbUK9 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
At a time when the schedules are top heavy with imported American action series, 'Spooks' is like a home-grown breath of fresh air. Spooks is a series which has generally improved with each successive year. It has been running in the UK since 2002, with the ninth series airing in the autumn of 2010.
The change came about around series three and four with important cast changes and more dynamic plots. It contains none of the soapy sub-plots or meandering gloom which afflicts much British detective drama. Nor is it burdened with the self-importance and brutal nastiness of the American '24'. The result moves at Formula One pace and is the most gripping and watchable British action series I can recall. The series takes place in a very real post July 7th London beset by terrorism, both external and of 'the enemy within' kind - from home grown suicide bombers to government traitors to Christian fundamentalists to FSB moles and Chinese agents.
The opening two parter of series 5 (2006) involved an MI6 led attempted coup-de-tate against the government, with only MI5 standing between Britain and martial law. It's scary and fast-paced. Other plots involve what appears to be an Al Quadiea takeover of a Saudi Trade Centre in London ( but, in reality, it's Mossad), with MI5's job hindered by a Mossad mole in their department hampering every move; and a terrorist take over of the Thames flood barrier.
Series 6 (2007) grew even more ambitious with a 10 part story line involving the team attempting to stop Iran going nuclear. Plots can be labyrinthine in their complexity, but it's glossy and big-budget looking. It benefits from some convincing performances. None of the characters are especially warm or likable - nor should they be, from Peter Firth's steely MI5 head Harry Pearce, to Herminoie Norris as Ros Myers - the best written female role on TV - and Rupert Penry Jones as the hard as nails but deeply troubled chief agent Adam Carter (who, during one episode almost has a nervous breakdown during a key operation). In episode one of series 7 (2008), Carter is killed by a car bomb and replaced by Lucus North (Richard Armitage) - fresh from a decade long incarceration in a Russian jail. Series 7 is the best of the lot, involving the return of the cold war, a Russian mole in the department (Harry is framed as the mole) and an episode in which an evil banker attempts to destroy the British economy by causing a collapse of the banking system.
Series 8 (2009) pitted MI5 against a secret global organisation called Nightingale, which has members in the CIA and the Home Office and ends with the death of Ros in a hotel bombing. Series 9 (2010) has North turning into a villain. It's all totally unpredictable. Anyone can die at any time in this series and that's what gives it its edge over other dramas.
The change came about around series three and four with important cast changes and more dynamic plots. It contains none of the soapy sub-plots or meandering gloom which afflicts much British detective drama. Nor is it burdened with the self-importance and brutal nastiness of the American '24'. The result moves at Formula One pace and is the most gripping and watchable British action series I can recall. The series takes place in a very real post July 7th London beset by terrorism, both external and of 'the enemy within' kind - from home grown suicide bombers to government traitors to Christian fundamentalists to FSB moles and Chinese agents.
The opening two parter of series 5 (2006) involved an MI6 led attempted coup-de-tate against the government, with only MI5 standing between Britain and martial law. It's scary and fast-paced. Other plots involve what appears to be an Al Quadiea takeover of a Saudi Trade Centre in London ( but, in reality, it's Mossad), with MI5's job hindered by a Mossad mole in their department hampering every move; and a terrorist take over of the Thames flood barrier.
Series 6 (2007) grew even more ambitious with a 10 part story line involving the team attempting to stop Iran going nuclear. Plots can be labyrinthine in their complexity, but it's glossy and big-budget looking. It benefits from some convincing performances. None of the characters are especially warm or likable - nor should they be, from Peter Firth's steely MI5 head Harry Pearce, to Herminoie Norris as Ros Myers - the best written female role on TV - and Rupert Penry Jones as the hard as nails but deeply troubled chief agent Adam Carter (who, during one episode almost has a nervous breakdown during a key operation). In episode one of series 7 (2008), Carter is killed by a car bomb and replaced by Lucus North (Richard Armitage) - fresh from a decade long incarceration in a Russian jail. Series 7 is the best of the lot, involving the return of the cold war, a Russian mole in the department (Harry is framed as the mole) and an episode in which an evil banker attempts to destroy the British economy by causing a collapse of the banking system.
Series 8 (2009) pitted MI5 against a secret global organisation called Nightingale, which has members in the CIA and the Home Office and ends with the death of Ros in a hotel bombing. Series 9 (2010) has North turning into a villain. It's all totally unpredictable. Anyone can die at any time in this series and that's what gives it its edge over other dramas.
Absolutely love Spooks.
ysic227 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
From watching a few episodes from BBC online, I was totally hooked. I then bought 9 seasons of Spooks and watching one to two episodes a day. What I love about it, is that it doesn't try and glorify the roles of Mi5 agents, it feels so realistic, and well it touches on topics that you feel wow, what our governments are probably doing to protect our country and keep us safe that we will most likely never know about.
It brings up the political agenda as well and how that that conflict can arise with bringing to justice criminals as it affects a politician's own personal agenda.
Some of the scenes are scary and the suspense just keeps going, its not predictable but keeps you on the edge of you seat, and my mouth has been left hanging open for quite a few of the scenes. What you also get is you never know which main character will die or be asked to leave the service, so never ever think that even the main characters are safe.
So if you like things blowing up, spies, the James Bond, etc. You will love this.
It brings up the political agenda as well and how that that conflict can arise with bringing to justice criminals as it affects a politician's own personal agenda.
Some of the scenes are scary and the suspense just keeps going, its not predictable but keeps you on the edge of you seat, and my mouth has been left hanging open for quite a few of the scenes. What you also get is you never know which main character will die or be asked to leave the service, so never ever think that even the main characters are safe.
So if you like things blowing up, spies, the James Bond, etc. You will love this.
Forgets Some Anglo-American History.
gmcslattery2 December 2023
UK TV writers are chronically anti-American, and there's no law against that.
But it's disturbing when Harry Pearce, head of Section D, has a warmer relationship with the #3 from Al-Qaeda (the British squeeze out a 4th syllable there-Al-Kay-EE-Dah) than he does with his US counterparts.
Throughout the series, frequent snide references are made about "the special relationship" and "the cousins." Americans are consistently portrayed as controlling and coldblooded, but surely they must have at least one redeeming trait.
I can think of two. Coming to Britain's aid twice. In one century. Across 86 episodes, I wish someone would've mentioned that. Just once.
But it's disturbing when Harry Pearce, head of Section D, has a warmer relationship with the #3 from Al-Qaeda (the British squeeze out a 4th syllable there-Al-Kay-EE-Dah) than he does with his US counterparts.
Throughout the series, frequent snide references are made about "the special relationship" and "the cousins." Americans are consistently portrayed as controlling and coldblooded, but surely they must have at least one redeeming trait.
I can think of two. Coming to Britain's aid twice. In one century. Across 86 episodes, I wish someone would've mentioned that. Just once.
Not only my favourite BBC series but also one of my favourites ever
TheLittleSongbird10 November 2011
I love a good series, and especially one that grabs you in just from the word go and thrills you. Spooks does exactly that. I watched it right from the first episode, being intrigued by what it aimed for but not expecting it to be as good as it was, and I have been a faithful fan ever since.
The acting is definitely a high point. Rupert Penry Jones, Hermione Norris(one of those actresses who brings everything to her roles no matter the overall outcome of the show/drama), Miranda Raison and Matthew McFadyen also gave wonderful performances. But as of late, the revelation has been Peter Firth, Harry is a very interesting character and as of now the heart of the series without dominating too much that we don't care for anyone else and much more of one than you'd think.
Firth handles the brooding, gruff persona brilliantly. The cast are helped by a vast majority of things. The characters have depth and are actually intriguing, I see great characters who you identify with and keep identifying with, I see characters that are interesting to start with but lose something later on or I even see characters that are little more than cardboard cutouts. The characters of Spooks from start to finish, yes even in the secondary characters(which my previous point was mainly referring to), fit in the first category.
The writing is also wonderful, the idea at the start was always an interesting angle and the writing explores this in an intelligent manner, without feeling formulaic. The story lines are always thrilling and well-constructed, while I also love the stylish filming, crisp editing, assured direction and authentic sound quality.
All in all, an amazing series, one of my favourites. 10/10 Bethany Cox
The acting is definitely a high point. Rupert Penry Jones, Hermione Norris(one of those actresses who brings everything to her roles no matter the overall outcome of the show/drama), Miranda Raison and Matthew McFadyen also gave wonderful performances. But as of late, the revelation has been Peter Firth, Harry is a very interesting character and as of now the heart of the series without dominating too much that we don't care for anyone else and much more of one than you'd think.
Firth handles the brooding, gruff persona brilliantly. The cast are helped by a vast majority of things. The characters have depth and are actually intriguing, I see great characters who you identify with and keep identifying with, I see characters that are interesting to start with but lose something later on or I even see characters that are little more than cardboard cutouts. The characters of Spooks from start to finish, yes even in the secondary characters(which my previous point was mainly referring to), fit in the first category.
The writing is also wonderful, the idea at the start was always an interesting angle and the writing explores this in an intelligent manner, without feeling formulaic. The story lines are always thrilling and well-constructed, while I also love the stylish filming, crisp editing, assured direction and authentic sound quality.
All in all, an amazing series, one of my favourites. 10/10 Bethany Cox
Watchable despite the anti-American propaganda
skyking-145 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The good:
It's a very good drama with excellent plots and very good acting. The writing makes for very good drama and the photography is top-notch! If you ignore the national labels and treat it like it's about a fictional planet it can be quite enjoyable. In particular the characters of Harry, Roz and Jo are very well developed and quite compelling.
The bad:
There is really, quite shockingly, a VERY PRONOUNCED anti-American bias in the writing... so much so that at times is appears to be socialist propaganda! There was even an episode (7.4) where they actually presented a senior Al Qaeda representative as if he were a "moderate" between Iran and the US! THAT is absolutely laughable nonsense propaganda... and specifically offensive to the victims of 9/11, as well as to those of us who were once stationed in that country as part of the US Armed Forces! This is an attitude which I personally knew was NOT the opinion of the British subjects with whom I associated during that treasured time in my military experience! One main character even refers to the CIA with "God defend me from my friends, from my enemies I can defend myself..." of course she shortly turns out to be a Soviet spy!
Seriously, given that the BBC has recently been outed for hiding the sexual abuse of children by one of it's knighted hosts after bashing the Catholic Church for the same offense, this series, while dramatically enjoyable, leaves one with little option but to question the credibility of this once respected voice of "journalism"!
It's a very good drama with excellent plots and very good acting. The writing makes for very good drama and the photography is top-notch! If you ignore the national labels and treat it like it's about a fictional planet it can be quite enjoyable. In particular the characters of Harry, Roz and Jo are very well developed and quite compelling.
The bad:
There is really, quite shockingly, a VERY PRONOUNCED anti-American bias in the writing... so much so that at times is appears to be socialist propaganda! There was even an episode (7.4) where they actually presented a senior Al Qaeda representative as if he were a "moderate" between Iran and the US! THAT is absolutely laughable nonsense propaganda... and specifically offensive to the victims of 9/11, as well as to those of us who were once stationed in that country as part of the US Armed Forces! This is an attitude which I personally knew was NOT the opinion of the British subjects with whom I associated during that treasured time in my military experience! One main character even refers to the CIA with "God defend me from my friends, from my enemies I can defend myself..." of course she shortly turns out to be a Soviet spy!
Seriously, given that the BBC has recently been outed for hiding the sexual abuse of children by one of it's knighted hosts after bashing the Catholic Church for the same offense, this series, while dramatically enjoyable, leaves one with little option but to question the credibility of this once respected voice of "journalism"!
Just Silly
dal_asher23 February 2017
I watched the first 4 seasons of this series and it just gets sillier and sillier with each season. I can't say for sure but the idea that any "secret operative" of any agency would tell the young child of a lover that they are "spies but don't tell anyone ever" is just absurd! It seems like they just brag about being spies a bit too much to be believable. The plots become repetitive and nonsense the further on in the series I get. If you want intelligent television try watching "The Newsroom" or "The West Wing" which I consider two of the best TV shows ever broadcast. I would hate to think this is a realistic portrayal of MI-5. It seems to me that real life MI-5 agents must find this program laughable and probably hate the ridiculous image of their service that it portrays. Don't think I will bother with season 5 onward.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
