The Future of Food (2004) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
very watchable - but maybe I shouldn't have ordered that large popcorn
scg-38 August 2005
A very watchable documentary suitable for all ages. We took our 3 kids (as young as 6) and they all got something out of it, even tho the content was serious.

Shows effectively how we are losing diversity in the seed / gene pool; that agricultural ownership is being concentrated in fewer hands; and that large conglomerates (such as Monsanto) are aggressively pushing genetically modified seed and chemical herbicide, as well as driving the family farmer out of business.

Like you'd expect in something like this there's a sort of relentless one-sidedness, and some of the scientific explanations seem a bit superficial. But well worth the time & price of admission.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Frankenfoods for America
lastliberal25 January 2008
There is probably nothing that we can do to change things as we have given up the oversight of our elected leaders by not voting or by voting on single issues at the direction of our preachers, but we should at least have some knowledge of what is being done to us by politicians and chemical companies in bed together.

97% of the varieties of vegetables that were available at the turn of the 20th century are gone. The food we now have - corn, soybeans, etc. - had been genetically modified so that there is only one or two varieties. There is no testing or oversight due to the negligence of the FDA and the US Dept. of Agriculture and the fact that members of both these organizations, as well as other politicians, including at least one on the Supreme Court, have been or are members of the boards or in the employ of of the chemical companies. In fact Monstanto said it didn't matter who won the 2000 election, they were covered.

The chemical companies have bought all the seed companies and now you buy from them or you do not plant. They have, with the help of the government and the courts, usurped private property to their benefit.

As I say, there is nothing that can be done, save buying organic or at farmer's markets; but this film contains information you should know, especially since as a taxpayer you are contributing $20 billion dollars a year to the chemical companies.

If the rest of the world does not accept our frankenfood, why should we?
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is an important film, one to view with friends and discuss over dinner. That will be some dinner, let me tell you.
jfdavisnyc@aol.com7 June 2007
I'm just curious as to why some of the negative reviewers sound like they may be working secretly for Archer Daniels Midland or Monsanto. Their bleating objections strike me as being pseudo defensive and very similar to those expressed by the tobacco industry when they're charged with deception and killing people with their product or when "An Inconvenient Truth" broke open the Global Warming debate and conservatives denied its veracity. Someone should check on those guys and how they earn a living. My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed "The Future of Food" and felt it did us a great service by expressing another viewpoint OTHER than what we get from the big corporations and our government. I wish it were our government.

It's an important film and well worth seeing and further discussion.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Should be Mandatory Viewing
colbydog7 January 2006
This is arguably one of the best examples of a film that has the ability to simplify a very complicated subject tat I have seen since The Corporation. Debora Koons Garcia has strung together the most cohesive and informative series of interviews, historic footage, biographies and science animations that culminate in a clear comprehensive message about our food and what is being done with it. It should be built-in to every television sold today... its that good!

The film describes in detail the history of agriculture and then focuses on the problems associated with industrial agriculture and the introduction of Agri-Business in the 20th Century. It reveals the unethical business practices that have resulted from Argri-Corporations need to make profit regardless of their effects on humanity. Agribusiness; like it or hate it, you will learn information you didn't know from this film.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Shocking
greenfreaks30 December 2006
This movie was truly shocking. I had no idea what was really truly happening with our food supply, I mean I had an idea, but I didn't think it was this bad. Makes you wanna run out into the streets and shout. I agree with the previous previewer, it is totally watchable for kids, and actually this should be shown in schools, libraries, where ever you can get a group together to see it. This info has got to get out there. WOW! What do we do? How do we do it? What do you eat? Where do you shop? Think about those things. See the movie and then make some changes! Maybe plant your own garden, or join a local CSA... do something!
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
E-V-E-R-Y-O-N-E should see this film...
SimulationX6 January 2008
... and I mean EVERYONE... but most importantly by all Americans. Save the money from your next gorefest and buy a DVD of this movie and give it to a friend... ... for its a movie that deals with the most basic of human necessities... our need for food...

This film deal with the changes to the way farming is done (primarily in the United States) and how along with the methods, how farm produce has also changed. It tells about the effects this change has on people all around the world...

This documentary isn't all about the doom hanging over the United States, although as I sat there watching it I couldn't help but feel that Americans are dooming themselves... not because of greed or the intent to harm... but merely because of the absence of information... ... and information is what this film gives... make a truly informed decision, one that will help you, your family and your community
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great documentary, should be seen by everyone
ClayDeaver13 June 2007
Every American needs to see this movie, I have purchased copies and given them away, I feel it's that important. Here on Oahu Monsanto has purchased an additional 2500 acres for genetic experiments on the food we eat. The information in this movie is suppressed in our country to say the least. If you say anything bad about genetically modified food in the press you are generally sued by Monsanto, and like some fox reporters fired for your story.The plight of those reporters is told in the movie as one of many events studied to give the viewer a picture of the conspiracy at hand. Although this film is becoming a bit outdated it is still a great foundation everyone should see about the corporate plot aimed at dominating and owning the world food supply at the cost of corrupting and polluting it forever.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A One-Sided Story That Misses The Point
jfett8514 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Not since "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Celsius 41.11" have I seen a documentary so biased. A big fan of documentary, I recognize that it is nearly impossible to create a film that doesn't lean towards one side of the subject. However, it is possible to let both sides have their say and allow the viewer to make up their own mind. "The Future of Food" plays more like propaganda against corporations and government than it serves as an informative piece on genetically modified (GM) food.

The good questions "Food" does raise are in conjunction with current patent and anti-trust laws. Sadly, the film attempts to construe these points as arguments against GM good and fails to see the true potential of the information.

When "Food" does bother to offer scientific support, it misrepresents and ignores. The film peddles fear by "revealing" that bacteria and viruses are used during the genetic modification process. Though technically true, "Food" fails to provide the important detail that only an enzyme from bacteria is used, not bacterial organisms or even bacterial DNA. There is also much ignorance by the filmmakers in their failure to acknowledge the extreme similarity in processes of genetic modification to natural evolution.

I am not a universal supporter of GM food, especially as it is applied in cases the film does choose to show us. However, there are many advantages to it and at least as many cases supporting its value - all which "The Future of Food" keeps off-camera.

Near the end of "The Future of Food", a farmer says that the only way to change the food industry is for the consumer to be educated and decide. It's my understanding that to be educated, you have to have ALL the facts.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Needed A Balanced Approach
fwomp7 April 2007
I worry about documentaries that get rave reviews but only show one side of the issue. And such was the case with THE FUTURE OF FOOD. Don't get me wrong, this film had some interesting information for viewers but it's very lopsided in presentation.

Its focus was on genetically engineered crops and how it affects everything from the seed to the dinner table. The film really goes after The Monsanto Corporation which is responsible for many lawsuits around the globe related to their patenting of a particular type of "Round-Up Ready" seed. What this means is that the crop itself becomes toxic to certain insects but not to humans. This gives it an advantage in that the crop becomes more sustainable with possible higher yields. The problem is that never before has something living been given a patent. And when seeds from adjoining Monsanto product fields accidentally blow into non-Monsanto fields, the law gets extremely convoluted. Now a farmer who has never bought a Monsanto product suddenly begins growing Round-Up Ready crops, and Monsanto wants their money.

The documentary would lead you to believe that Monsanto was out to destroy the small, independent farmer, and this is a possibility. Maybe a bit of a stretch but certainly not something beyond the Big Business approach in today's capitalist market. It is also where the documentary begins to show some logical leaks. Not once are we shown an interview with a Monsanto representative (or even an attempt to get one) which gives The Future of Food its aforementioned lopsided presentation. If film makers want to be taken seriously, they have to be willing to risk ridicule from "the other side." This gives viewers the chance to discuss and research the topic and not simply force-fed (no pun intended) the documentary-makers' opinion.

The other issue with the film is that there was a section dedicated to the molecular make-up of certain genetically modified seeds. Although interesting and important, it went too far into microbiology and genetics for the average person (I've actually studied science so it wasn't too far of a stretch, but the non-scientific mind might have quite a bit of difficulty with it).

The ending of the documentary was probably the most interesting part, showing how the organic farmers are reaching out to communities via farmers markets and appropriate labeling (something that genetically modified developers do not want).

All in all this was very much a scare tactic approach to shock the viewer into action. Although this isn't as horrible as it sounds, anyone with half a brain will most likely wonder what Monsanto and other GM farming groups think about the entire subject. Unfortunately, through this film, we'll never know.

I will say that if even a fraction of what was presented here is true, then watching the film is worth your while. But I'd recommend doing some research afterward so that you get the entire picture.
5 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Make up your own mind but at least watch
tfrancis-722 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is very one sided so be prepared to think for yourself but it's not a bad thing. Millions of dollars are being spent daily to tell you the other side. At least hear this side out. If you want to believe all the hype about genetically altered foods it's your choice but don't make it only hearing what big business and elected officials paid by special interest groups have to say. Food for thought. Why would a company go to so much trouble creating genetically altered foods to feed the poor or the starving. They only create them to make money. Starving people do not have money. Please watch this movie and make up your own minds I doubt anyone would wish they had never seen this movie but many will wish they had. I know that Monsanto hopes you skip it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Future of Food
HGSPhila-17 December 2005
THE FUTURE OF FOOD (TFOF) skillfully takes on the task of describing the constellation of large, hard issues relating to modern food production. What a task! In its analysis TFOF correctly and importantly ties together the relationships among the 3 factors of production - land, labor, and capital - in getting at an accurate description of the modern enclosure movement at work in our fast food world.

TFOF's coverage extends to the many spatial and historical dimensions of farming, to the legal, intellectual property of "pharming," to some of the technical aspects of the genetic modification, and shows where we are headed.... But that's up to you!

TFOF compares to THE CORPORATION in its potential impact. It could be even bigger. My local store was selling it at the checkout counter yesterday - 12/6/2005!
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Flawed
stenlis26 May 2008
I really wanted to like this film. It deals with a topic of great importance and generally propagates ideas that I agree with - like the dangers of corporate behavior, the threat to biodiversity that GM products pose and the absurdity of patenting life.

So what's the problem? Let me sum it up:

  • most of the movie is comprised from old footage cuts accompanied by a rather dull commentary. Not very captivating.


  • the commentary is badly written. It's repetitive and often fails to make a point. For instance, it cites three methods for genetic modification of a cell. Dramatic music, the 'expert' says that the procedure is very invasive to the cell and that it mimics the behavior of a virus and... nothing more. I wanted to know what problems can arise from the treatment but there was no explanation. Is it really surprising that overwriting the DNA is 'invasive' to a cell? Yet, this treacherous 'invasivness' is mentioned several times through the film (with no additional information).


  • important information is left out. For example, the movie mentions the Supreme Court's decision on the Monsanto vs. Schmeisser trial but fails to mention the Court's reasoning that sheds a different light on the severity of the ruling. On top of it the court denied any compensation to Monsanto. This clearly didn't fit the film's agenda.


  • the choice of the talking heads is poor. When compared to the respectable lineup that producers of other documentaries were able to accumulate (e.g. The Corporation, The Power of Nightmares) I can only assume the creators of The Future of Food just didn't make their homework. Where are (ex)employees of the bioengineering companies, politicians that took part in creating the regulations for GM and where are the representatives of the regulatory government bodies?
17 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Buy organic!
LivingDog25 August 2010
I first became aware of things not being quite right when I developed an allergic reaction to various products. So now I started looking at the labels of all the products I consumed - from soap to toothpaste to food. What I discovered was that the American food diet is a slow death sentence. E.g. after brushing my teeth, my stomach would ache and I did not know why. I finally read the label of my toothpaste for the first time in my life. It warns you that if you swallow too much of it, you should call the local Poison Control Center. I was slowly poisoning myself, and it is sold over the counter - it contains bleach! I switched to Tom's of Maine and no longer have those stomach problems. I then saw the movie "Supersize Me." It confirms that the American "fast-food" food industry is a slow death sentence. Then I saw "King Corn" and it confirms that the corn being grown in the US is inedible - unless it gets "processed" at a plant! Now comes "The Future of Food" and ... I am depressed. I apologize to every single organic food grower, and consumer for ever thinking you guys were "full of it." The irony is of course that I was the one full of "it." Please let others know what is going on - tell everyone you know to see this movie ... and BUY ORGANIC! That's my plan. If we stop buying their sewage then they lose profit. If they lose profit, THEN we get their attention. may God richly bless you and yours, in Jesus' name, amen.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sure Hope More People Watch This...
jim626330 July 2006
SOON -- and that they comments, seeing as there are only ~5!

Very Interesting that even though Amazon.com sells it, IMDb has no hyper-link for/to it (up in the right-hand corner of its title page there) like they do virtually all other films (and/or the/an official website link!! What the hell's w/ that??

Anyway, Y'all can also get this most-excellent DVD at peaceproject.com , I'm quite sure. It's really disturbing -- also re: so many other fine film documentaries -- that so few people have seen and are (apparently) unaware of its existence! If people don't get their act together, we're REALLY in a LOT of trouble, Y'all -- and i don't mean only re: food/s!!
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
eye opening
suyrakant27 May 2008
it's time people understand about the destruction of our planet.... this film is an informative way to jump-start that awakening.

Comment guidelines Please note there is a 1,000 word limit on comments. The recommended length is 200 to 500 words. The minimum length for comments is 10 lines of text. Comments which are too short or have been padded with junk text will be discarded. You may only post a single comment per title.

What to include: Your comments should focus on the title's content and context. The best reviews include not only whether you liked or disliked a movie or TV-series, but also why. Feel free to mention other titles you consider similar and how this one rates in comparison to them. Comments that are not specific to the title will not be posted on our site. Please write in English only and note that we do not support HTML mark-up within the comments.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must See!!!!
jacob-hill5 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
To everyone complaining about wanting to be presented the other side of the story......you have been. Everything you heard about up until this point was pro GMO propaganda, just as this was anti GMO propaganda. This just confirms what we've all known for ages, that this really is a government of the people with money for the people with money.

I don't need to know the outcome of the law suit, the fact that Monsanto was allowed to patent life and even brought the case(s) to court in the first place is enough to make me shake with rage. The fact that GM products are not required to be labeled in our country and are known in several cases to cause reactions to consumers is a gross miscarriage of justice.

The Doc is clearly biased, but I welcome it, because sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Every American should add this to their MUST watch list!
reneealarie29 February 2012
This documentary is a terrifying eye opener that every American should watch. The future of our food truly depends on the educating of American citizens. Our food is being tampered with in an unnatural way and the long term ramifications are unknown. We deserve to know what is in our food and it is our job to DEMAND it! This film opens your eyes to the risks of GMO's in our food, the corruption that is our food industry, the injustices small farmers face at the hands of corporations, and the danger of tampering with mother nature. If we don't fight for the complete elimination of GMO foods we may wipe out any indigenous agriculture we have left. Please watch this and any other informative documentaries on food. Tell your friends and loved ones. Sign every petition you can, and contact your local legislature to share your voice!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good
Cosmoeticadotcom1 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The Future Of Food, an 88 minute long documentary, released in 2004, and directed by Deborah Koons Garcia, wife of the late founder of the 1960s rock band, The Grateful Dead, Jerry Garcia, is a film that rehashes many of the same points made in the earlier films, yet also goes a bit more deeply, penetrating into the web of how Monsanto, and other agribusiness giants weave a web of control and oligopoly that reverberates up and down the food chain, and puts the squeeze on the small, family farmer, even waging a war on them. The film shows how a Canadian farmer named Percy Schmeiser stood up to Monsanto and was ruined by a corrupt Canadian judiciary (although, if one follows the link provided, it seems that Schmeiser actually got the upper hand in 2008!).

The film also details how these corporate thugs, mostly in the petrochemical and insecticide and herbicide industries, have cornered the market in the seed industry, and how ridiculous patent laws have allowed the first company with the idea to patent natural plants to do so, and how they have tried to standardize patent laws worldwide so that an American or French company could somehow dictate the agricultural and food policies of developing and Third World nations, in a sort of corporate colonialism that is bound to engender not only health, but political, problems in the future. The destruction of native cultures is just part of the problem, for the larger issue is the absurdity of patenting life itself, and stating that Crop X belongs to a foreign company, thus allowing foreign interests to lay economic and legal rights to products they had no part in cultivating, while also allowing these unevolved and monoculture crops great range and susceptibility to droughts and pests they cannot fight off, for even Monsanto's Round Up Ready soy beans are showing their limitations as a food source, whereas Mexico's natal and diverse forms of corn, which occasionally remix with wild and progenitor breeds prove hardier and more resistant than the genetically modified corn from north of the border.

The film also brings to light what is called the Terminator Gene that has been developed in certain crops, which was designed so that limits on crops could more easily maintain crop process. The utter folly of this, were these strains to become dominant, is that famine would be rampant, and the very development of such a gene, alone, should be enough to convince any legislative body of the folly of allowing corporate empty suits to have any say in the vital national security issue of feeding the masses. All in all, The Future Of Food is likely the best and most information rich of these documentaries in conveying the scope and depth of the issues surrounding America's insane agricultural process.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
watch with your critical thinking cap on.
hanginonthetele23 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Like a couple of other reviewers here, I am not a full-on GM supporter. Hell, I've got no love for Monsanto. But I must agree that while raising a few absolutely crucial points, this documentary comes across as deliberately manipulative and one-sided - as much so as the Penn & Teller special presenting the other side of straw-man land. Anyone who knows anything about propaganda ought to be insulted by the dramatic music, dramatic images, and far-reaching inferences presented here. While perhaps it's a good introduction to the problems we're facing with agribusiness, particularly for indigenous people, I hope that people go out and read a few books and reach their own conclusions.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Trouble with Monsanto
bandarmae3 March 2010
This documentary is an essential crash-course on GMOs. It's an honest, accurate exploration of how GMOs are threatening the world's healthy food supply. You also learn everything you need to know about Monsanto's plot to control all our food and witness the death-squeeze the company is putting on American farmers--especially farmers who are remarkably courageous to stand up to this cold-blooded corporation. What Monsanto is doing to farmers is just criminal. Boycott Monsanto products.

Deborah Koons Garcia, the widow of Grateful Dead's Jerry Garcia, directed this film. You can even view it for free at http://www.hulu.com/watch/67878/the-future-of-food .
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Future of Food (2004)
SnakesOnAnAfricanPlain6 January 2012
An excellent companion piece to the widely recognised Food, Inc. The Future of Food focuses more on the scientific breakthroughs of the last 20 years. It shows how the genetically modified seeds have crossed with those that are harvested by farmers that wish to have no part in this corporate game. These farmers are not to be sued for having patented crops they never wanted in the first place. It's a rich and complex issue, as the dream of cheap and healthy food for all has evolved into a sickening game of chase the cash. Yet another damning of the capitalist nature of America, it preaches for a more simplified world or organic farming. Heavy on the science and low on the sentiment, this is an educational documentary that opens the eyes.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
propaganda
etjatm24 June 2009
This type of propaganda doesn't do anything for the debate. The agriculture community has been talking about the monoculture issue for years. Is it a potential problem? Yes. Do dramatic films that twist data do anything to truly inform people? No. From "Feed Grains, Soybeans and the World Trade Organization" by Albert Allen, Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University "Although scientists agree that GMO products are safe, consumer groups, environmentalists, political leaders, doctors,and others are increasingly debating the health, environmental and ethical issues surrounding these products. In European countries, governments have delayed the acceptance of corn varieties that are GMO enhanced. This could lead to world wide delays in the marketing of these products to consumers." So, "scientific consensus" is good enough for global warming but not for GMO's. Interesting.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Poorly done propaganda
carnivalofsorts1326 January 2008
This film is a glaringly one-sided propaganda piece. At no point during the film is anyone interviewed that would present a viewpoint that is contrary to the prevailing attitude of the film. The science is presented inaccurately and, of course, slanted toward the anti-technology, Luddite view that is obviously held by the film-makers. In addition to the manipulative, preachy quality of the film, it was also exceptionally boring and ugly to look at. It had the feel of a very amateur production. I find it very disturbing that so many people have reviewed this film favorably and claim that it is extremely important and a must-view, etc... Obviously there are many people out there who are willing to go along with such propaganda unquestioningly and do not even care to hear alternative viewpoints or rebuttals from the vilified parties. This, to me, is much more frightening than the "threat" to our food presented in this film.
9 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Both sides please.....
louknees8 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"The Future of Food" is a documentary that deals with the history of the agricultural industry and the development of genetically engineered food. It delves deep into the topics of patenting these genetically engineered creations by huge corporations and how the FDA's and EPA's regulations aren't strict enough and how food that has been genetically engineered in the United States does not have to be labeled. This is all valuable information.

Then the movie spends the rest of the time bashing a corporation "Monsanto" for destroying the lives of all these farmers and potentially they will bring the end of the world. Phrases like "if 60 genetically altered salmon are entered into the mainstream population, the salmon species COULD be extinct within 40 generations," are all fine and good, but there's no flip side of the coin. There's no one from Monsanto backing claims. There's no one saying, "Genetically engineered salmon could increase population growth." It seems that many documentaries recently have become witch hunts against multinational corporations, which I think are great if both sides are presented. Maybe Monsanto didn't want to talk to the filmmaker, but if that was the case, let the viewer know that at least they tried to show both sides of the story. Show the filmmaker calling or have a graphic saying "They declined comment." "The future of Food" is a great idea, with a lot of great information, but it ultimately fails because it only shows 50% of the story, hence my 5 out of 10 rating.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed