"House M.D." Informed Consent (TV Episode 2006) Poster

(TV Series)

(2006)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Strong episode
kellielulu8 July 2022
Cameron is sure she is taking a strong stand but one by one House, Foreman and the patient take her on . Her views evolve painfully for her over the episode. This is largely an episode with House , the team and the patient. Wilson and Cuddy are minimally used . It keeps the episode appropriately tight.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gritty episode
xredgarnetx9 October 2006
An almost unrecognizable Joel ("Cabaret"/"Remo Williams") Grey plays a world-famous researcher who collapses and nearly dies, and then wants House to "off" him on the QT. Not normally a moral dilemma for any veteran physician (I used to be a hospital employee, so I know), this particular case stops House from simply killing the guy as House scrambles to figure out a way to save him. The entire staff must come to grips with the issue of suicide and mercy killing, a common-enough hospital practice but not so common to House's young staff, especially the doe-eyed Cameron. Grey is great as the suffering senior. Again, I am being asked for more lines than I care to write. So in that case, let me point out it will be worth keeping a close eye on Cameron in this episode.
36 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great discussion generator
doublejake17 November 2006
As House goes, this is a fairly typical episode, with lots of soapy melodrama, overacting, one-dimensional characters, and an overly simplistic view of medicine combined with lots of dramatic license. However -- it's a GREAT academic tool. I teach "Medical Law and Ethics" to budding health care professionals (it's one of the first three classes in their curriculum), and have now used this episode in about ten classes over the last five years on the last day of the course. It does a nice job of incorporating half a dozen basic principles into a package, from informed consent for research to informed consent for treatment; from active euthanasia to passive euthanasia to "let nature take its course." It is a gripping tale despite its unrealism, and a powerful educational tool as a springboard to class discussion about the general and theoretical principles they have been studying for many weeks. It's been a great way to wrap up the class on the final day. Class member feedback has been that it's very moving, very thought-provoking, and there's JUST enough ambiguity so that the viewer has strong suspicions but is ... not ... quite ... completely certain exactly who might have been in the hospital room at 2:30 a.m. It's an episode worth watching, especially for medical newbies as an academic exercise.
36 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed