The Ghost Writer (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
459 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Old-fashioned noir, beautifully crafted for modern audiences
Chris_Docker1 May 2010
The Ghost is the story of a ghost writer who wins an assignment to tidy up the memoirs of a recently ex British Prime Minister to turn them into a best seller. It's set in the United States, and revolves around unproven accusations of allowing suspected terrorists to be extradited and tortured. The previous ghost writer has been found dead.

I found this a tense thriller with the added attraction of that pointed economy of execution for which Europeanised Hollywood (of which Polanski must be one of the leading exponents) is famed. As was often the case with Hitchcock, the story, camera framing, and a sense of mounting anticipation, produce more suspense than any amount of car chases, expensive stunts, intrusive music or grandstanding of stars.

Polanski's choice of stars is interesting, particularly as the two lead parts Pierce Brosnan (as former Prime Minister, Adam Lang) and Ewan McGregor (as the ghost) are known more for their 'star-appeal' performances than any detailed character acting. Yet they are perfectly cast, both for their on screen personas and for the space given them to develop. When Brosnan comes alive in sudden fits of rage (almost recalling Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon) we become more aware of his considerable strength as an actor, allowing the character – deliberately something of a stereotype – to shine through. The ploy is somewhat less successful though with Kim Cattrall, who seems forever in her Sex and the City persona. or Tom Wilkinson, who sadly seems to have just been wheeled in just to read lines from a supporting role. A less recognisable face in the formidable array of stars is Olivia Williams (Miss Stubbs in An Education, and also making a return in the new series of Dollhouse). So when Williams, as Lang's wife Ruth, shows unexpected fire and passion we are taken by surprise – without any of the voyeuristic appeal of watching Ewan McGregor bare his bottom – as he, or his double, does quite readily.

The Ghost can be watched on two levels. Firstly it can be enjoyed as a straightforward thriller of a traditional sort. Aimed at modern audiences, it has plenty of sudden shocks but less twists and turns than, say, Chinatown. Even the ending has been simplified from the original script, which would have given a further meaning to the title and the whole film: but at the risk of being perhaps a little too clever.

But for those who want to draw unsettling comparisons, there is a fairly heavy-handed likeness to accusations about Tony Blair's complicity in what have been termed war crimes. And as Adam Lang, ensconced on an island off the east coast of America, far from the reach of the International Court of Justice (to which America does not subscribe), is pulled deeper into the plot of conspiracy theorists, another reading is easy to find: Polanski's own isolation for alleged crimes committed many years ago. For those that want to follow such parallels, there is a US Secretary of State that looks worrying like Condoleezza Rice. And when Lang refuses an invitation to go to London for fear of arrest, it might possibly recall Polanski's comment, "The last time I went to a festival to get a prize I ended up in jail." The Ghost is a beautifully 'hand-crafted' film, almost belonging to the age of noir, when characters were shadows and revelations exposed with dramatic force rather than loud bangs. Perhaps not as flashy as masterpieces such as Chinatown or Rosemary's Baby, The Ghost is still a welcome addition of quality and sleek design when the market for such dramas is swamped with bad stories and cluttered execution.
39 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A polished, tightly made, but rather routine political intrigue film...not bad, but!
secondtake28 June 2011
The Ghost Writer (2010)

A very conventional political thriller, well done, smartly paced, but a bit drab or slow at times, too.

And familiar.

So you go into this kind of movie looking for what distinguishes it, like the understated performance by Ewan McGregor. And the really gorgeous setting, which looks so much like either Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket you'd swear it was. But in fact the utterly incredible house was built for the movie on a sandy island in northern Germany called Sylt. Most of the movie, in fact, was shot in Germany, including Berlin (which was meant to be London), for the simple reason that the director, admitted sex offender Roman Polanski, couldn't travel to the U.S. without being arrested. There are a few driving scenes and scenic inserts that were filmed on Cape Cod (in the U.S.) without Polanski's presence.

It's interesting that Polanski wanted to make a film that had to be set here even though it made things difficult. Doubly so because his protagonists are all British, making weakly disguised references to Tony Blair (Pierce Brosnan doing a routine job--he really can't act worth beans if an actual emotion is required) and his wife (Olivia Williams, who is absolutely terrific, award material).

Which brings us back to McGregor, playing a ghost writer for the ex-prime minister's memoirs. He's really terrific at playing someone with savvy but also naiveté. He's smart but at first so trusting he gets into what is obviously a dubious job, his predecessor having just been killed. But we are lulled, too, until events internationally unravel the situation and he discovers some inside information. Of course, this puts him in more danger, and us in more suspense.

It's good, very good, but we have been here before. The details are different, but the intrigue is the same. Yes, we know about this shadow government where people are manipulated and assassinated while the news coverage is rose and contrived. Yes, we have seen the detemined innocent set out to prove the truth. Even the direct facts, that this young writer is going to rewrite his predecessor's apparently finished memoir, and then begins with the most basic interviews of the subject, don't shape up.

You'd never know this was directed by Polanski. Or would you? If you look at his earliest films you'll find some edgy, almost cruel quality ("Repulsion") but if you see "Chinatown" you'll actually have a parallel to this one--a well made film in a conventional container (that one has an amazing Jack Nicholson to lift it up). There is of course "Rosemary's Baby," which was lifted by a really creepy story. For "The Ghost Writer," Polanski's last film, you keep thinking there will be a real twist, something large and bizarre or just chilling, but it doesn't really happen. In fact, when the memoir gets published it's all a bit anti-climactic.

And so, the final ten minutes, at a party, feels like a desperate attempt of the writer, and director, to make all this effort more than just another polished intrigue. At the last minute, a highly improbable final discovery occurs, followed by an even more improbable and shocking last ten seconds. Surprised, we sort of say, okay, I get it, and that's that. Not exactly the reaction you'd want to have after a decent two hours preparing.

I say no more except that the final seconds are also an homage to Stanley Kubrick's "The Killing." You'll see. Nice touch.
25 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, but not more than that
hendersonhall21 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT!*** A good thriller--better than the flashy, over-emphatic Shutter Island--but not more than that. Still, good is good and I'm not knocking it. I enjoyed the movie. Brosnan was really impressive. It was shrewd of Polanski to cast him (he needed a star to give the small role heft) and it took balls for Brosnan to take the role. Also, the directing was usually first rate and had some really creepy effects. BUT a few big problems, which don't make THE GHOST WRITER a bad movie, prevent it from being better than good. I won't write further about the good things in it (others have done so) but here's why I was disappointed and why I give it no higher than 7 out of 10. (REMEMBER SPOILER ALERT! READ NO FURTHER IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT!) When the Ghost is given the room of his dead predecessor whose belongings have not been cleared out, it's a tip-off that's too obvious. First, the crowd that runs this house would have gone through it with a fine tooth comb and got rid of everything a.s.a.p. Second, we know that once the Ghost moves in he's going to find something incriminating. Then there's the ending. Why does the Ghost tell the wife what he's found (which I assume is what's in the note he passes to her)? Given her company's record of murder and its attempted murder of him, it's like a suicide note. And the staging of the final scene is so unoriginal it's not worthy of Polanski. After the Ghost walks out of the frame and the camera stays put on the street, we know--if we've seen Hitchcock's FAMILY PLOT and other flicks that use the same device--that the street is waiting for a killer car to drive down it for you-know-what.
40 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Controlled enigma
Blade_Le_Flambeur24 February 2010
Roman Polanski's 'The Ghost Writer' bears the most in common with his recent 'The Ninth Gate'. The comparison starts this review as many others will inevitably find some comparison to be made with the director's work, especially since his personality looms so large.

The plot has been described countless times and will be spared here. What instead fascinates is the depiction of Ewan McGregor as the nameless protagonist. He has no family, no real attachments so to speak, and no real drive. Like Johnny Depp's "book detective" in 'The Ninth Gate' his reason for existence seems to be to serve those higher in society. McGregor plays the party well, never completely convincing in one state or the other. Even when under duress his physical movements speak much more about his mental state than his mannerisms. This could be interpreted as Polanski's examination of apathy within larger society. What I mean by that is to say that it is through the Ghost's lack of interest that one can observe the world.

Shot by Pawel Edelman, who has collaborated with Polanski in the past as well as with other heavyweight Polish filmmaker Andrzej Wajda, the images of 'The Ghost Writer' suggest a cool bleakness. Accompanied by a poetic score by the always reliable Alexandre Desplat the film suggests a constant looming menace, embodied by the rain of the New England island. The camera often remains static, sometimes zeroing in for reactions, but always showing a complete action through a singular movement or lack of movement. Often times the characters seem resigned to their fates. The roles each person plays in the story are very clearly defined. Former-PM Adam Lang (Pierce Brosnan), surrounded by his lackeys, anti-war protesters, etc. all seem just pieces of grander scale. Polanski's world view is so thoroughly and crisply represented through this visual style it is as if the individual events are not as important as the atmosphere in general.

This is precisely why the film works, because of a director so in command of his craft. The film runs over 2 hours but every decision feels completely blocked and planned out. Every image carefully composed, every moment of information tightly plotted. 'The Ghost Writer' works terrifically by raising your blood level in this manner. Some will inevitably complain it makes the film seem merely serviceable when such expected plot twists occur. Yet I can think of few filmmakers so readily able to create such a vivid world and sustain it greatly. There are some pacing issues and the music can be overbearing. These are not unlike the problems facing Martin Scorsese's 'Shutter Island'. The talent of all involved makes the film exceed a workmanlike thriller even though the atmosphere on set was so mathematical.

A very enjoyable, meticulous film that demands and rewards patience. Worth seeing.
201 out of 262 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-crafted thriller, but some loose ends in the plot
yris20022 May 2010
No doubt Roman Polansky knows how to build a gripping movie, with craft and wit, in this case a political thriller, where references to Blair and Bush are no so much explicit, but subtle enough to be perceived somehow. Reviews underlined a style resembling Hitchcock: indeed, the story proceeds, creating suspense, thrill, without appealing to excessive action or shock, although never reaching Hitchcock's subtlety of insight and mystery, both in characters and situations. Mostly, the plot proves some loose ends as the craftily prepared intrigue seems to come to a hasty ending, leading to a finale which does not appear up to the great potential and high expectations of its previous development.

Convincing and well-focused performances by the whole cast, especially by Ewan McGregor who keeps a high-level performance, never abusing his intriguing role, but thoroughly contained, Pierce Brosnan proves good in his part, although his past stereotyped roles make it difficult to see him credible as a former prime minister, Olivia Williams as his wife Ruth delivers a smart and talented performance. Quite interesting are some minor characters, such as the members of the service, or the old man living on the island, who enhance, despite or probably thanks to their more silent presence, the mysterious atmosphere of the story.
46 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Captivating thriller with a solid script n top notch performance by Gregor.
Fella_shibby20 December 2021
I saw this few days back on a dvd which I own.

Inspite of the dvd being in my drawer for a decade, I never felt the urge to go ahead.

What a fool I was cos this is an amazing thriller with a top notch performance by Gregor.

The cinematography is excellent n the best part is the script.

The movie inspite of being a simple thriller has lots of tension n it is very captivating from the go.
45 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
HK Neo Reviews: The Ghost Writer
webmaster-301723 August 2010
A good thriller, but a forgettable affair...

It is a rarity nowadays to see a complete film that uses its characters to create suspense and thrilling moments, rather than relying on technological advancement. Polanski is an old school type of director and like The Pianist; the journey is all about our lead character. Ewan McGregor is one of the most underrated actors in Hollywood and it is him not Pierce Brosnan that drives the Ghost Writer, like a thriller. The good news is that this film captures your attention from start to finish. There is no doubting of the fact that the film constantly alludes to a certain Prime Minister known as Tony Blair and even to a smaller extent of the Bush Administration. War on Terror is probably political, but departing from those sided political views, The Ghost Writer is an efficient and credible thriller that manages to provide enough suspense and interesting moments to engage the audience for the entire duration.

Ewan McGregor plays a ghost writer for the former prime minister of England (played with charisma by Pierce Brosnan). McGregor is an excellent character actor; you can tell that he is immersed into the role so deeply that you feel for him. It is the kind of film where you follow the character, whatever he is doing, you think along with him. While the film is by no means the class of The Pianist, the film is still thrilling enough to engage. In a way, Pierce Brosnan adds screen presence and has the looks of a political leader, but it seems as though that his apparent lack of range actually made the Ghost Writer, a lesser film. A scene stealing cameo from Tom Wilkinson is most definitely criminally underused. Perhaps, a younger Wilkinson would make a brilliant former Prime Minister. In many ways, I was actually disappointed with Olivia Williams's portrayal as former First Lady as she fails to convince.

All in all, The Ghost Writer is a good thriller, but there are plenty flaws along the way. The problem with the film is not so much that it really didn't say much, but rather it is the type of film that catches your attention during the duration, but loses from your memory as the credit starts to roll. Not a bad effort by the acclaimed Polanski, but really it could have been much better...(Neo 2010)

I rate it 6.5/10

  • www.thehkneo.com
20 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great thriller in the tradition of Hitchcock (and Rosemary's Baby)
eliot_axelrod8 March 2010
This is a connoisseur's movie. It needs to be consumed slowly and deliberately to truly enjoy everything that has gone into it. Watch it carefully, there is a lot going on under the surface.

Yes, it's a thriller, and as such parts of it are fast paced, but what it does so well is to misdirect your attention for a while before snapping you back to focus.

There are no wasted words, nor gratuitous scenes in this movie. Just like a Hitchcock movie, the scenes are all necessary, even if they are symbolic.

The acting is first rate, and I say that because much of the tension in the movie comes from the way the characters act, not special effects, not plot points hammered in over and over again.

It is a very dark movie, and the darkness is nicely set off by humor and sarcasm in a few spots.
244 out of 346 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Huge disappointment
dmasursky8 September 2010
I know it means that I'm stupid and unsophisticated, but I was so disappointed in this movie. I had heard very good things about it, but I thought it was slow, clichéd, and predictable. It also felt very derivative - I kept thinking of State of Play (both the original British mini-series and the American remake), which were much more interesting and compelling. Watching the Making Of video on the DVD helped a little to understand what they were going for, but I thought they missed an opportunity with this story and especially with this amazing cast. The performances were terrific of course, and there were some good moments. But overall, my mind wandered and I questioned the characters' behavior repeatedly, neither of which you do during a great movie. I wanted to like this and I planned to like this, but I just couldn't.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Polanski and McGregor, a wonderful match
maureenmcqueen22 February 2010
Ewan McGregor gets rid of every ounce of glamour and allows his Polanskian character to emerge. I though, a few years ago, Polanski could have played him himself the way he played so beautifully in "The Tenant" Those two characters are not that far apart. Taking over an apartment or a job from someone who leaves the scene under very mysterious circumstances is practically the same thing. McGregor, however, is superb. In "The Ghost Writer" events play close to the knuckle. Who is Pierce Brosnan? Tony Blair? and Olivia Williams? Classic film-making at its best. Compelling and visually stunning. The score by Alexander Desplat reminded me of Bernard Herrman and the atmosphere is so thick that the film's 2 hours plus fly by at an amazing speed. Polanski at 77 doesn't show any signs of jadedness. He is in total control. Hurrah for that!
140 out of 205 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
POLANSKI IMITATING HITCHCOCK
MadamWarden28 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is a good thriller. Stylish, well cast, well directed and produced. Absorbing old school cinema.

Ewan McGregor is excellent as the reluctant hero and detective. Pierce Brosnan is also great as the egotistical puppet. Lovely to see the little cameo by Eli Wallach.

A few minor shortcomings and lazy writing like the previous ghost's belongings just left in the room even tho he is murdered because he knew too much. Sloppy and annoying.

Otherwise a great watch all round.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Has Polanski made the perfect movie?
aharmas26 February 2010
The key word here is suspense, the perfect blend of a director at the peak of his powers, a script that beautifully works with a source without diluting its essence or compromising its subject matter, and with a timing so perfect that no false note is hit, enrapturing its audience, never letting go, pushing its limits as the audience awaits its incredible resolution.

McGregor plays a hired writer who comes in to assist Lang (Brossnan) in the publication of his memoirs. Timing couldn't get worse as an unexpected complication ensues and many people's lives and reputations are suddenly in danger. As the film reaches its conclusion, with tensions and levels of paranoia reaching unheard limits, it's got our attention, and it has earned every bit of it.

The quality of the writing is impressive, with no false moves, no red herrings, no unnecessary distractions, no manipulations to sway you one way or another. What we have is a mix of intrigue, action, Shakespearean drama, and performers who might never be this good again. Polanski channels Hitchcock at his best, using Desplat's driving score (himself channeling Herrman), and just when it all could have been a tribute, it soars above its inspiration.

Among so many impressive elements, one has to mention the note perfect and outstanding Olivia Williams, an actress that has moved on from being physically alluring to developing acting talents which could rank her with Streep and Close because of her impeccable and powerful turn. Here is a woman who hardly resorts to gimmicks, but takes the most normal of situations and weaves a wave of intrigue that would leave you breathless.

"The Ghost Writer" is a mystery, a thriller, a tribute to the masters who inspired the genre and might even surpass all those sources of inspiration. The film mixes politics with an old fashion thrills and makes us wonder why Hollywood hasn't made movies like this more often. It's early in the year, but it's going to be hard to find anything that can even come close to this movie, a film that is as perfect as anything any director has ever put together, Hitchcock included.
286 out of 444 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A bit disappointed
typhoon7418 July 2010
The longer you wait for something, the more disappointed you (might) be. And that turned out to be true for me regarding this one.

Some movies keeps you glued to your seat, but after an hour or so, I didn't even bother hitting the Pause-button when going for another cup of coffee. Not sure if it was the movie or staying up late all weekend which made me sleepy.

The plot, the cast, the director - all the ingredients indicated that this would be a good one. Where did it go wrong?

In my opinion I think the story was too thin. The dialogs, specially between The Ghost and Lang's wife had some cheap points and they never seemed to hit the nerve. The extra's (those who talked of course) were real bad, which also removed the last part of any kind of drama. Even Brosnan was not that good. He didn't strike me as a typical Prime Minister and he did not add any "juice" to the part. The music didn't seem to fit in and made me think of anything but a thriller.

Oh well, all these small (annoying) things, but when I add them up, I ended up with a pretty boring movie. The only person who really looked like he was in a political thriller, was McGregor. He played his part well. Unfortunately, his effort alone was not enough to save the project.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
So bad! I am dumbfounded by the positive reviews!
l-simonson15 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I can not help but wonder if many viewers are biased by the fact that this is a Roman Polanski film. In my opinion, it was sophomoric in its execution. Really quite terrible... and I am not generally a harsh critic of movies. The story line had so much potential, but the execution failed. Here are my criticisms:

(1) Ewan McGregor's character is completely unbelievable. It is unconvincing that an ordinary guy/ghost writer would take up the task of solving a high-profile, super-secret murder within the course of 3 days that he has been working with the Prime Minister. And not only is that premise hard to believe, the lines he delivers and actions he takes are so ridiculous. He naively trusts everyone (the PM's wife, the Paul Emmett professor, the PM's enemy Rycart) despite the fact that his predecessor was suspiciously murdered... carelessly sharing the secret photos (badly photo-shopped, btw) and incriminating evidence, even though he is being chased by unknown "bad guys". The writing and acting makes his character completely unbelievable.

(2) There are two primary sub-plots (the PM's war crimes charges and the CIA connection), but the stories are not effectively woven together or fleshed out... and neither are made very intriguing or compelling. I left the film thinking, "OK, so I understand the CIA connection now... but how is that actually intriguing? And does it have anything do to with the war crimes plot line? Was the war crimes thing just completely irrelevant?"

(3) Some of the writing is so dumb and careless. For example: The Ghost Writer discovers the supposedly top-secret CIA connection to Paul Emmett simply by Googling it.... unreal! The bedroom scene with the Ghost Writer and PM's wife, and their relationship after 2 days of being together... unbelievable! Also, the Ghost Writer solves the mystery within the text of the book by simply connecting the first word used in each of the first few chapters... so unimaginative! And then he passes a note to the PM's wife at the public book launch with the secret discovery (with Paul Emmett at her side, who has claimed all along not to know the PM)... seriously?! And at the end when Ghost Writer gets hit by the car, since it seems that the CIA had a car waiting exactly for that purpose (despite the fact it was a complete shock that he figures out the secret)... so stupid!

I really wanted to like this film and it started out good, but quickly went downhill... and seemed to pick up bad momentum all the way to until the end. I wish I knew how so many positive reviews have been written. I am baffled.
227 out of 382 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Recapturing Hitch
JohnDeSando10 March 2010
From Knife in the Water and Rosemary's Baby to Chinatown, Roman Polanski has shown a skill at the slowly distributed thriller, and especially with a dash of hard-core politics as in Chinatown's Los Angeles water intrigues. Now in The Ghost Writer, the acclaimed director recaptures that Hitchcock sense of inevitable evil slowly stalking the rich and famous while the little guy protagonist witnesses the underbelly of power.

Ex-Prime Minister Andrew Lang (Pierce Brosnan) hires a ghost writer (Ewan McGregor) to finish an autobiography by the previous ghost writer, who mysteriously drowned. As unnamed ghost begins his work in a Martha's Vineyard hideaway of Lang, mayhem breaks out, for Lang is accused of sanctioning water boarding in the Iraq theater.

While it is apparent Lang's personal life is deteriorating as well, the ghost pursues with the tenacity of Jake Gittes the mystery of how his predecessor died, gaining a few bruised bones but not a broken nose for being nosy.

While the film has some clichéd situations, almost as if Polanski is trying to evoke '70's thrillers in all their cheesiness, he has recruited an excellent cast. In addition to McGregor and Brosnan at their best, Tom Wilkinson as a suspicious Ivy League academic and a cameo by Eli Wallach as an old Vineyard denizen are so good that I wanted more of them. Polanski has always directed his actors well, but of course he is smart enough to hire them in the first place.

The stark; outdoor settings; the almost antiseptic interiors; the slowly suspenseful music; the car chases; the shower; and the suspicious ladies,especially the blond), are a few of the Hitchcock touches gracing the Ghost Writer. That Lang is unable to reside in only few countries of the world where he can't be extradited for crimes against humanity is a light reference to Polanski's own exile. For that allusion, I applaud him and wonder how he can keep a sense of humor amidst his possible imprisonment on charges of statutory rape.

However, he is after all a certifiable auteur whose legacy will outlive any prison time.
68 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Polanski's genius is not enough to turn flawed material into a great film...
enicholson23 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Polanski is in top form here. In terms of pure film-making craft, Polanski has never really done too much better than this, but unfortunately the material he's working from, though well done on many levels, ultimately doesn't wash.

1. Why would Professor Emmett go to such lengths to conceal from the ghost writer his relationship with the former Prime Minister when a) he has a photo of them together hanging on his wall, and b) later, at the end of the film, he allows himself to be seen publicly chatting with Mrs. Lang (herself a former agent) at the book release party? Anyone visiting his home or attending the book party (who also uses Google) could easily make a connection between Emmett and Lang, not just an overly curious ghost writer.

2. We're supposed to question that Lang has a natural taste for politics on the notion that all Lang really wanted to do in his Cambridge years was party and chase girls (like politicians never party and chase girls); yet we're not supposed to question that he had a natural taste for espionage? JFK got more girls than James Bond, so I'm not sure what Lang's interest in politics relative to spying says about his skirt chasing. Based on what is presented to Ewan MacGregor in the film, he doesn't find any hard evidence that Adam Lang was in the CIA. Only Emmett's suspicious denials(this guy was a spy?), which he displays right away when MacGregor visits him at his house leave any kind of tell that Emmett is hiding something. If Emmett just admitted he was once friends with Lang, then MacGregor wouldn't have anything on him. I could have easily had a good friend in college who was CIA without me knowing about it. But denying that I knew him at all would reveal I was hiding something. Emmett's behavior doesn't wash. His character is poorly written -- too much of a bumbling fool to be a believable CIA agent.

And realistically, if an English Oxbridge student wanted a career in intelligence, why would they bother with the CIA and not just go to work for MI5 or MI6 or some other British intelligence service? Anyway, so the ghost writer discovers Lang had an American CIA pal from his days at Cambridge. Professeor Emmett not only acts like a complete fool to one of Lang's ghost writers, but two of them! (the first one gets killed when presumably Emmett acts like a suspicious idiot in front of him too) This is what is especially hard to swallow about this movie. When did CIA agents start to so easily give themselves away, yet remain so able to rule pull the strings of the universe?

3. Though Lang clearly has much bigger problems with the International Criminal Court than with any rumors of CIA connections, we're supposed to believe that he, his wife and Emmett are able arrange for the murder of meddling ghost writers merely because they became suspicious a) Paul Emmett once worked with the CIA and b) also knew Adam Lang. Well, assuming Paul Emmett knew dozens of people in college (probably more than most students if he was active in theatre and other campus activities), are we also to presume everyone else he knew at Cambridge must have had CIA connections too? Give me a break.

4. Finally, this film has a great ending, but am I really supposed to believe that Emmett and Mrs. Lang can arrange for people they don't like to be run down by a car only minutes after giving the order? The genius of Roman Polanski can make flawed stuff like this play well, really well. But the flaws are still there. As fun and suspenseful as this film is, the B-movie underlying material here just isn't up to Polanski's level.

On another note, as I think others have pointed out, it's interesting to watch a film about a famous man essentially exiled in America, while Polanski himself is exiled out of America (and Britain for that matter). Yet, Polanski gets nabbed in Switzerland of all places. I guess Truth is much more fascinating than this kind of half-baked fiction.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Truly Brilliant and Amazing
Lizardo529812 April 2010
I went in to see this film without any prior knowledge of what it was about. I kinda like that when I see a movie... I only knew that Ewan McGregor was in it and that was good enough a reason for me. The first two things that I noticed in this film was the cinematography and the score. I thought that the cinematography was beautiful and the settings were stunning. There was a reason why everything had a certain look about it. The opening music at the beginning was also another hint that something is quite off through the whole movie. This isn't going to be a run-of-the mill mystery story; this is so much more.

Without giving away anything, there is so much to see and speculate on when you are introduced to the characters. I didn't realize until the very end of the film that you are never hinted as to ANYTHING about The Ghost. More than once I was going over in my head to try and remember what his character's name was, but to no avail. Ruth's character is something else completely compelling and curious. Truly brilliant characters in this story.

I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who is looking to go see a truly amazing and cerebral film. It doesn't mess with your head in the way Shutter Island did, but it makes you think and it really leads you down every single road of the map, all at the same time.
100 out of 148 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What her majesty does not know
stupendoussays24 July 2010
Roman Polanski never loses his touch at directing good movies irrespective of what happens in his personal life. At least it seems so after watching this one. Adapted from a novel, the storyline was quite intriguing. The story of a Former British PM's memoirs, his questionable actions as a PM and the mysterious death of his Ghost writer. Well it might seem like a straight enough plot, but the unravelling mystery will leave you astounded. The star cast was well chosen. Pierce Brosnan who plays the former British PM does a good job although it seemed like he is trying a bit too hard to sound British. Ewan McGregor as the Ghost writer does a splendid job, after all he knows the ways of the force. Olivia Williams and rest of the cast have also done fairly well. The movie stands well on its own but the film score in the background adds to the mystery and the feel of it. All in all its a good watch.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An involving story that deeply immerses us in the experience
howard.schumann7 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Instead of using fast cuts and other modern cinematic gimmicks, Roman Polanski's The Ghost Writer relies on an involving story that deeply immerses us in the experience, a tribute to his immense skill as a director. Based on the novel Ghost written by Robert Harris, the film is about an unnamed author (Ewan McGregor) who is hired to complete the memoirs of former British Minister Adam Lang (Pierce Brosnan) after the previous ghost writer was found dead, his body washed up on a beach in New England.

Although it is a suspense thriller, The Ghost Writer also makes a sharp political statement, creating a main character that very much resembles former British Prime Minister Tony Blair (Harris, himself was a strong supporter of Blair until he broke with him over Britain's participation in the war in Iraq and Blair's subordination to U.S. foreign policy interests). Because Polanski was banned from the U.S. because of an event that occurred 32 years ago, the film was shot in Germany and its depiction of Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts is recreated on the island of Sylt in the North Sea.

Opening as a ferry disembarks suspiciously leaving one car behind, the film establishes a mood of unease and danger from the outset, aided by an atmospheric score by Alexandre Desplat. People talk about the drowning of the previous ghost writer as being either an accident or a suicide yet, like many CIA-assisted suicides, it is suspicious right off the bat (or off the boat) and the new author soon finds himself buried in intrigue when he visits Lang in his security-entrenched compound on the seacoast.

McGregor is a blank slate, an ambitious young man presumably just out to take in a huge paycheck but after reading Lang's autobiography and finding it to be a "cure for insomnia," he is determined to have the former Prime Minister share his life and work in a more authentic manner. The writer is invited to stay in the compound where Lang resides with his very articulate and somewhat bitter wife Ruth (Olivia Williams) who suspects his assistant Amelia (Kim Cattrall) to be his mistress. McGregor's autobiographical work is interrupted when he hears in the news that Lang has been accused of war crimes by a former minister and is being investigated by the World Court.

To appear to be engaging in business as usual, Lang travels to Washington in a private jet owned by a company with a name similar to Halliburton, where he is defended against the accusations by a State Secretary who looks very much like Condoleezza Rice. At home, however, protesters show up on the island together with hordes of press and Ruth has to turn to the author for some physical and mental solace as the plot swoops and dives into unpredictable twists and turns that keeps us off balance until the powerful conclusion.

Heading an outstanding cast, Brosnan delivers a strong performance that strikes the right balance between fear and arrogance and McGregor is also pitch perfect. Winner of a Silver Bear in Berlin for Best Director, The Ghost Writer shows Polanski at the top of his form and in total control of the medium. Even though he had to complete the final editing of his film in a Swiss jail and under house arrest in Switzerland, the fact that it still bears the stamp of his genius is a tribute not only to his art but also to his character.
104 out of 163 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth watching, but hardly mesmerising
Linden-172 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
***WARNING SPOILERS***

I have to write something, after reading the mostly gushing reviews for this film and having just watched it.

Although mostly enjoyable and with some exciting moments, there are just too many problems with this film for it to be hailed as 'excellent' or one of the best films of the year:

  • badly cast characters: none of the characters really worked in my opinion (bad British accents - and social class counts - and the class of these characters doesn't fit with their roles and education, strange decisions and actions by the characters - that anti-war protester was just farcical) - convoluted storyline : why the 'too easy to find' clues, how did the car outrun the CIA car? why was the main character allowed to live to the end? - product placement: just cheesy, giving Google, BMW and Sky News blatant product placement like this - missed opportunities: it would have made more sense for the Emmett character (or even the Rycroft guy) to have organised the killing of 'Blair' - instead we are left with a rather ridiculous anti-war protester shooting him (and how on earth did he get onto the roof of a airport with a gun)


Anyway, sorry to burst the bubble, but this film isn't as great as many reviews on here would have you think. But if you don't mind this, it can still be considered a worthwhile watch.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Masterful Thriller
cinemaofdreams17 March 2010
Polanski is a master of subtlety, grace, and wit. His eye creates breathtaking and beautiful shots. His ear adds a malevolent and demented humor to the score of a film. There is most always something unspeakable, indescribable beneath the surface of a Polanski film. Something unnerving about the tone but never overbearing, or pounding the audience over the head with it. This is certainly true of The Ghost Writer. What I found surprising, not being familiar with the novel on which it is based, was the political statement being made. Humorously portraying certain key figures in the political environment of the last decade. In any other hands, this could never have been done so believably and deftly. All the key performances are on target. And how could they not be. For Polanski knows how to work with actors and guide them in creating such memorable characters. Ewan McGregor certainly fits his role seamlessly as does Olivia Williams. So many could learn from Polanski how a thriller needs to be constructed in order to hold an audience to the very end. The word entertainment means to 'hold in between' which is what The Ghost Writer does from beginning to its haunting and inevitable conclusion.
110 out of 178 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable but flawed thriller
jpkwolf9 February 2012
Roman Polanski is a great director and The Ghost Writer is a very captivating thriller. You get hooked pretty much instantly and will watch the movie until the end. However it's one of those movies that aims for greatness but ultimately falls slightly flat. Without giving any spoilers the movie in general is very enjoyable but in the end the plot isn't that deep and is even slightly flawed. The ending of the movie leaves something to be desired. Anyway great direction, camera work, editing and acting from everyone involved. Sadly the script doesn't deliver that classic movie. Only a good entertaining thriller with some flaws
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Flawless Gem; Exhilaratingly Good
Kenn-1527 February 2010
Polanski does some of his best work in a long time in this nearly-flawless and beautiful-looking film. Engaging story, interesting characters, incredible mood and sense of place (amazingly, locations in Germany substituted brilliantly for Martha's Vineyard -- having spent some time on the Vineyard, I was completely convinced that's what I was seeing, forgetting during the film that Polanski wouldn't have set foot on U.S. soil), more implied violence than any real screen violence (for those who like suspense but stay away from thrillers because of worry about violence, don't worry) -- it's all about suspense and intrigue. Every shot is gorgeous. Fun references to CHINATOWN, and especially Billy Wilder's SUNSET BOULEVARD. Lovely performances by Olivia Williams, who is sexy and vulnerable, Pierce Brosnan, the absolutely always brilliant Tom Wilkinson and an extraordinary cameo by Actors Studio legend Eli Wallach (he still has the chops!). The ending caps a perfect film perfectly, and the MacGuffin is great fun. If you like vintage Hitchcock, and especially if you like the best work of Polanski, don't miss it. I'm ready to see it again and watch how it's put together.
177 out of 299 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ghosting it
Prismark107 February 2019
Roman Polanski directs Robert Harris best selling thriller. It was loosely inspired by former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair's war exploits.

Ewan McGregor plays a writer who is not interested in politics. However he has been offered a lucrative job to be a ghost writer for the memoirs of former Labour British prime minister Adam Lang (Pierce Brosnan.) The previous ghostwriter died in an accident and McGregor needs to write the memoirs quickly.

Lang is holed up in Massachusetts with his wife Ruth Lang (Olivia Williams) and assistant Amelia Bly (Kim Cattrall.) He is at risk of arrest from the International War Crimes Tribunal for illegal rendition and torture.

McGregor starts to interview Lang, trying to find out what makes him tick, why he got involved in politics etc. Over time he discovers holes in Lang's story. He joined the Labour Party a few years earlier than he claimed.

More intriguingly McGregor investigates how the previous ghostwriter died and thinks that he was on to something before his premature demise.

McGregor confronts Lang and tells him that Lang was groomed for power from his university days be shadowy guys in American intelligence. Something Lang laughs off.

Polanski directs the film as a thriller. McGregor enters a world that gets murkier but the film also gets foggier. It is still an effective film with a good twist.

Because of Polanski's legal issues, he cannot film in the USA. The lack of American location shooting is rather obvious. Also I would had liked to see more of Lang. I think Brosnan's part was curtailed to the film's detriment.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The story is weak - a disappointment
phd_travel18 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I admire Polanski's movies for their ability to captivate the audience and his suspenseful yet reality based movies. In the GhostWriter the mysterious atmosphere is captured but the characters are uninteresting and unsympathetic and the story is just plain rubbish. The silly twist of making Olivia such a mastermind just seems like a twist for the sake of a twist. And the abrupt death at the end is just too much. There is a weakly explained ending. Brosnan seems rather ill at ease. Olivia Williams's character is too scizo to be realistic. Ewan isn't interesting at all. You just don't care what at happens to him. Kim was fascinating to watch but a bit under utilised. Why did Polanski choose this lame and silly story to make a movie. It was a waste of a good director.
103 out of 196 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed