Metronom (2022) Poster

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A respectful trip down memory lane, but not the nostalgic one!
sanda_moroianu17 November 2022
In order for the readers of this review to fully understand my position, I need to situate myself in the picture- the historical one, not the movie. At the time of the unfolding of that story I was 2 years younger than the protagonists, a tenth grader in one of the two best high schools in my town, an avid listener of Free Europe and a constant fan of Cornel Chiriac's Metronom, to whom I owe my still present love of good music and my sentimental involvement with good, everlasting music. To this day, every 4th of March is the day I light a candle as a remembrance of that day of 1975 when he was assassinated, in Cornel's memory. Having lived through that period and the subsequent one, it came as a shock to me to read all those reviews written either by people my age, who should have lived through similar constraints and so hopefully developed a similar attitude, or by people much younger, who completely lack the accurate information and/or the desire to get it, so they express opinions just because they can, with no relevance whatsoever to the actual events. You know what they say: "Those who ignore their past are bound to relive it." Such reviewers speak about "the plot" of the film. Guys, that "plot"was our lives, the despicable politics of the communist régime to keep your head down, your mouth shut, your "eyes on the prize"- the prize in this case being educated by the system into brainwashing and believing that the socialist/ communist régime is unquestionably the best of them all. I can't blame the generation of our parents for not fighting against the oppression, though we are currently living through times in which it is fashionable to blame it all on the parents, irrespective of generation, as long as it justifies one's failure. We, in our turn, were educated in a culture of fear of the authoritoes, of the securitate services, of each other; the older generation knew it was best to beware of everyone, since you never knew whom to trust. Actually, after the revolution of December 1989, when the archives of the securitate were opened to everyone, many of us made the epic mistake of wanting to see their own record, thus finding out that their friends, relatives and often spouses were the ones who had turned them in and gave regular reports about what was spoken in their houses. The blackmail to which the protagonists are subjected, either the classmate who thus gives his family the opportunity of fleeing the socialist Romania and living in the West, or the whole class who will only sit their finals- the bac- if they agree to collaborate with the securitate indefinitely were among us- they and their parents, making a hideous crime of the fact of listening to good, international music. For a large part of the youth of those times the importance of music to keep our heads above water, to keep us functional in a drab, gloomy world full of prejudice, fear and self loathing for not being able to do anything against it will never be underlined strongly enough. Nor will be the trauma that we lived with. I am sorry for the new generations who, unless they have been educated by parents with a strong and reliable conscience, seem to be unable to appreciate the numerous freedoms which they have, not even when faced with the harsh realities of those times. Guys, ask yourselves why those teenagers were dressed in uniforms in order to go to school, why they had numbers sewn onto said uniforms like convicts in prisons, why they were listening to music in secret and writing letters to the radio stations in the West in secret, why they were abusively taken from their houses to the securitate station. Eh? Why should you complicate yourselves with such useless questions, since you've been living in a free world, enjoying all liberties at will, having all music at your disposal, and being torn by a single type of torture: what to wear at school the next day in order to be fashionable enough. But for this you should show some curiosity and go and watch the movie. We were 4(four) people in the theater, the rest were watching Wakanda; black panthers seem more appealing and easier to watch than your recent history.

The director Alexandru Belc must have had good advisors; the period accents are well placed, the décor detalis, from house and institution furnishing and deorations to clothes and underwear, the drab atmosphere, the naiveté of the young protagonists, as opposed to the fear and precaution of their parents. The sound track must have cost a fortune out of the film budget- The Doors, Janis Joplin, I don't know about Mircea Florian or Sideral Modal Quartet, but they were rightfully chosen in a film about music, about failed lives in a failed society- not that the present society were perfect... The end of the film, showing all our protagonists debating the subject from the Romanian literature exam comes as a final blow- or maybe an expected one, depending on each viewer's experience: all our protagonists could sit the bac because they had made the pact with the devil, by signing contracts of informants with the securitate. In high school I used to have a school mate who, for a similar "crime", was forbidden to sit the bac and went to work in a coal mine, without graduating. I have no idea what became of him... The film is not perfect. If I were to direct it, I wouldn't show a boy with such long hair - at the party, the one with whom Ana dances, I wouldn't show that outburst of violence- the securitate guy smashing that other boy's face with the phone in front of so many witnesses, I would express a lot more concern about getting pregnant- a constant worry for young girls in those days.

On the whole, "Metronom" comes as close as it gets to a faithful depiction of the times, with the extensive help of the cast- Mara Bugarin, a teenager in love with her heart on her sleeve, unable to believe the sleeve could be so tainted; Vlad Ivanov, who seems to be made for roles of villains such as this one- a securitate colonel: he doesn't hesitate to threat Ana with a gang bang in the basement of the building if she doesn't cooperate, him being the father of a girl barely older than Ana. The best indicator of how much this film caught me is the fact that I simply forgot about the traditional nachos with cheese cream sauce and I left them uneaten, only to discover them almost untouched at the end of the movie. Plus the music score, which sent me back memory lane- aka Youtube- to search for those songs long unheard, but not forgotten. How could one forget "Cu pleopa de argint"- With a Silver Eyelid, by Mircea Florian, albeit a nod to Emerson, Lake and Palmer's "Lucky Man"? All in all this film is a respectful reconstitution of times that all young Romanians should know about, in order to avoid repeating them and all older Romanians should too, in order to avoid making fools of themselves when stating, full of conviction, that the socialist/ communist epoch was the best that could be and is to be regretted in contrast with the world we live in? But these representatives of the older generation could very well be the teenagers of yore...
41 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good plot, interesting story, 1 unreasonable scene.
ciripel29 August 2022
The sequel of events is interesting but there is a scene that ruins the whole movie with it's exaggeration. It's true that the Security Police (Securitate) was trying to keep the current communist regime in power with methods of terrorizing and making people denounce one, another. That's why they were paid. But the scene in which a teenager is asking for a phone call and in return he is hit by a "securitate" officer with the telephone in the headin the face of all his colleagues is really unrealistic. Yes they would've threaten and verbally harras you. But that would've been basically all in the 60s, 70s and 80s. Especially to some youngsters that were sending letters to the Europa Libera Radio Station. Violence was really unnecessary and even counterproductive. Also for a virgin as Ana is. To make sex with the boy she likes in the daytime, with his mother inside the house and leaving afterwards is also unrealistic and without any point. I feel like the movie could've been better but beating this dead horse with the Securitate and communist regime ruined it a lot.
18 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
the Metronom generation
dromasca19 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
'Metronom' (2022) by the Romanian director Alexandru Belc is not a film about the legendary radio show 'Metronom' from Radio Free Europe but about the Metronom generation. For viewers who were lucky enough not to know what the life of the youth in a communist dictatorship meant and what role music played in the disintegration of propaganda and the collapse of the system in Eastern Europe, I recommend as a prelude or documentary material Leslie Woodhead's film 'How the Beatles Rocked the Kremlin'. Alexandru Belc started planning for such a non-fiction film, but during the documentary process he decided to change the direction and make a fiction film instead, his debut as director in this format. The generation of Romanian teenagers from the beginning of the 70s had the chance to listen to the shows of DJ Cornel Chiriac, who broadcast from Munich about pop music and about a free world, where young people had access to all kinds of music, literature, art, culture they wished and could chat and even travel freely anywhere. For the Metronom generation, these radio shows were lessons in music and freedom. I also belong to this generation. I will try to write objectively about 'Metronom', but I can't promise that I will succeed.

The story takes place in Bucharest in the autumn of 1972, in the month of October. Romania was playing in the Davis Cup final against the USA, and snippets of the tennis matches will be shown on TV at the party that is at the center of the plot. The participants are final grade high-school students who take advantage of the absence of a girl's parents to gather, talk, smoke (tobacco) and drink, but above all to dance and listen to the music they love: Romanian pop tolerated by censorship and the Metronom radio shows of Cornel Chiriac. The young folks write a letter to Radio Free Europe in which they complain about the ideology that oppresses them and demand for their musical preferences to be broadcast. The love story between Ana (the main heroine of the film) and Sorin takes place against this background. Ana knows that Sorin will soon travel abroad and that he will not return. She wants to convince herself of his love and seal it with her first sexual experience. Sorin is behaving strangely and suddenly leaves the girl and the party. A few hours later, the Securitate invades the apartment, arrests the young people it finds there and takes them to a brutal investigation. Listening to Western music was not forbidden by law, but sending a letter to a foreign radio station was a crime in communist Romania, a crime punishable by imprisonment, with the prohibition of rights, with the impossibility of studying in a university. With violence, threats and blackmail, the security policemen try to force the young people to denounce each other and sign statements pledging to become security informers. Ana, who had come to the party to meet Sorin, finds in her the resources to resist. The investigator tells her that Sorin was the one who denounced them all. Perhaps this was his way of buying a passport to freedom? Lie or psychological pressure? Released after a nightmarish night, Ana will try to find Sorin and find out about the truth.

Alexandru Belc was born eight years after 1972. He had the chance to live through communism for only about nine years, so it cannot be said that this film conveys the result of a direct personal experience. And yet the reconstruction of the era is very accurate - the streets; the Bucharest apartments with limited spaces, full of heavy furniture and books; tape recorders and pickups used at parties; the clothing, including the hideous school uniforms with the appalling matriculation numbers. However, the reconstruction of the psychology of the characters is what impressed me the most. I think that Alexandru Belc managed to build a memorable character through Ana, helped of course by the special interpretation of the actress Mara Bugarin. I think he did very well by also looking for inspiration at his generation and the youth of the same age today. Then as now, young people wanted freedom, to listen to the music they want, to discover the world around them, to explore themselves, to love. Ana in the film has the innocence of the young woman who knows she has the right to freedom despite the lies that surround her, the dignity to resist blackmail, and the courage to live her romantic relationship despite the betrayal. Sorin's character is less fleshed out and that's a shame, because he represents the other side of the youth back then. Vlad Ivanov, always an impressive actor, also appears in the film, and the only complaint I could make is that he repeats here a type of role that he has played many times before. I liked 'Metronom' because it says a lot of true things about my generation and times that some idealize, others demonize, and which were much more complex than one extreme or the other. The ending is awesome. The young students passed the baccalaureate and seem, apparently, to have returned to the 'norm'. It is actually an open ending and even a false ending. Have they been called again to Securitate? Did some of them agree to become Securitate collaborators? What is for sure is that they will be in the streets 17 years later, among those who will destroy the system. Cornel Chiriac and his Metronom won in the end.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Metronom
M0n0_bogdan22 May 2023
This one and the previous "movie" I've seen should be in a double feature.

From the stupid "kissing booth" premise to "the communist Securitate is trying to put me, a teenager, in jail for listening to Led Zeppelin and writing a freakin' letter". It really puts in perspective what kind of people we are that we allow this to happen to ourselves. We are not that anymore, we go in the streets and we peacefully protest now haha. And really puts in perspective what kind of dumb teenagers there are now, with all their freedom, bah...no wonder we are trying to keep that period longer and longer.

As a movie it keeps that communist vibe all the way, the vibe we are trying to lose in our movies now but hey, there are still stories to be told.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good but not the best!
PlateHumus-4313217 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The storyline was a poor,but very attractive. In the first minutes of the movie it seems a little bit boring, but further it gets very interesting. There was 1 unreasonable scene, the one in the final where a teenager gets hit by the officer with a phone. That scene was very unrealistic and it was better if it wasn't been included.

Also, the audio of the movie was really bad. There are some scenes where you can't understand what they are saying. And when they are screaming or hit something the volume gets for no reason down and at normal again.

In the end, the movie is a good classic, it shows how the teenage life was in the communist times of Romania and how hard was to live back then. But for a movie made in 2022 it is not well. It needs something more, in special on the technical area.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Romanian new wave cinema's realistic long shots meets The Doors' "Light My Fire" in a hauntingly beautiful teenage drama set in a totalitarian regime
panourban20 January 2023
The movie honors Cornel Chiriac, a cult figure among the youth listening to his Radio Free Europe's Metronom music show, who was assassinated by the Securitatea secret police in 1975. How was to be hippy in communist Romania? Partying, being in and making love, listening to political and music programs broadcasted by Western radios, and attempting to send letters to them. Not all of these activities were very tolerated by the communist regime, and some were illegal. When Ana, in love with Sorin, is interrogated by Securitatea officers together with her partygoing classmates about their intention to send a letter with music requests to Radio Free Europe, she brutally understands the vicious power of the totalitarian regime and its unfair encroachment into the fragile minds of sincere lovers. The film is an astute and emotional commentary on the complicated relationship between (political) freedom and (uncertainties of) love.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Beautifuly filmed, extremly poorly written
alexmih-3351821 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I left the cinema without understanding what this film was about. Whitout it managing to create almost any emotion in me and with no point left to ponder on.

Filmed in a box format, with credits reminescent of the 70s era and with a bit of washed colours, the film sets a very good stage for the story, managing to create the atmosphere of that period.

The story is promissing in the begining, the party scene is very well built. I felt completlly emersed in the moment.

However, for me, everything breaks up after the police comes to the house. Everythings gets very confusing, and not in a good way. The story unfolds without managing to give any sense of the point the director is making.

The nudity scene at the end is also completlly unnecessary and delivers nothing.
19 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Plagued by the sins of Romanian New Wave cinema
FaneZugrav2 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The 'New Wave' of Romanian cinema can be characterized with a dynamic between a beautiful cinematography and a horrible approach to storytelling (or rather the lack of a story altogether). Unfortunately, 'Metronom' is no exception.

Visually speaking, the movie is stunning, shot in a 4:3 format. Every frame can practically be hanged on a wall. Wide shots that depict the young students as small in comparison with the surroundings, calling out the condition of living inside an oppressive regime. Close shots are usefully applied to show, on the one hand the intimacy of the confined world of the student's party, and on the other the tension and stress of the 'interrogation'. The beautiful imagery is accompanied by great, relatable (on the part of the students) and masterfully horror inducing (on Vlad Ivanov's part).

Unfortunately, the goods that this movie provide stop here. With the exception of one scene (which I will get to a bit later), the movie is plagued by the same tropes that 'arthouse' Romanian cinema has been suffering from ever since the first proper 'New Wave' installment (The Death of Mister Lazarescu) was released in 2004. While the plot of the movie is an interesting topic (the experiences of youth in the so-called 'Golden Age' of Romanian Communism), the movie fails to build a proper story that drives the plot to a pertinent completion. On the contrary, yet again, the story is left somewhere in the background, only for the plot and movie serve as a vessel to put forward a message supposedly delivered to the audience: communism is bad. While the message is completely true, it should not be the driving force of the movie. It should not be served up on a platter, while the audience is forced to consume it for the duration of the movie.

Thus, the story is left estranged, we know what happens with the characters, and we understand the betrayal that Ana feels in the end. However, this is overshadowed by the straight-in-your-face method of depicting the aforementioned message. There should be a balance between story and meaning. The meaning, the message should be discovered with the unfolding of the story, left for digestion and contemplation, not chewed upon for one and a half hours only for it to leave a bitter aftertaste. Beautiful cinematography and great acting can only do so much for a movie, and in this case, they don't save it.

There is but one scene where the movie shines and we get a glimpse of how cinematography, music, acting and story can harmoniously go together to form true cinema. What I am talking about is the moment after the unfulfilled love scene at the party, where Ana wanders from place to place in the apartment looking for a refuge for her broken heart, for a friend to confide in. She is only met with loving couples, symbols of fulfilled teenage love. As she wanders, we feel her desperation growing with each pair of lovers she clashes with. The rendition of Janis Joplin's Kozmic Blues in the background ties the scene together, offering a musical and lyrical representation of what might go through Ana's heart at the moment. The beauty of the scene abruptly ends as Ana leaves the apartment and we are brought back together in the movie as we are hit by the silence that so characterizes the soundtrack of 'Romanian New Wave'.

All in all, the movie feels more like a reminder of what communism meant, rather than a piece of cinema. The image and the acting save it as it gets a passing grade of 5/10, and left me overall disappointed with it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This Movie Ruined My Life
s-0303118 January 2024
This was one of the most disgusting pieces of literature I have ever witnessed with my own two eyes. This Movie single handedly made me doubt if we ever advanced past the stone age. The effects used where abosolutly eye wrenching and stomach churning. The plot was boring, uninspired, and downright pedestrian. The charcters are one dimensional and have even less depth than thing one and two from cat in the hat. Sorin is argubaly one of the worst charcters ever created in modern cinematic history, although his actor tried his hardest and put on a "watchable" performance, there is not much you can do when you are given a script witten by a donkey's fecal matter.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed