"CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" Coup de Grace (TV Episode 2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
There Is No Bad Man
claudio_carvalho8 June 2023
After the murder of a black man in the parking lot of a fast-food restaurant by Officer Danny Finn, he reports to Brass that the man was shooting with his gun and he fired three rounds to subdue the suspect. However, the witnesses tell to the police that it was an execution and Officer Finn is racist. Soon the victim is identified as LVPD-Sergeant Scott Johnson, and the records show that he had a beef with Officer Finn in the past. The evidences collected in the crime scene do not support most of Officer Finn's testimony. Meanwhile, Sara volunteers to investigate the murder of a young boy near an abandoned school with Det. Moreno and David Phillips and she realizes that his death is around the gunshot in the nearby parking lot.

"Coup de Grace" is a great episode of "CSI", with a simple storyline but with complex resolution. It is great to see that incidental tampering of the crime scene may conduct the investigators to wrong conclusion. The tragic plot concludes in the end that there is no bad man in the case. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Coup de Grace"
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Follow the Evidence
Hitchcoc5 March 2021
Gil Grissom always used the "follow evidence" as the reason for his success. Keep emotion out, don't jump to conclusions, and be aware of your prejudices. This episode involves the shooting of a black police officer near a hamburger joint. The officer who shot him is a veteran and it is suspected that he did a coup de grace, where the man was down, there was a delay, and he fired a third shot into him. It doesn't help the case the the shooter is racist and his comments are caught by his microphone. But all the things I've mentioned come into play when people are brought in who should not have been. Some of the CSI's have done some conclusion jumping. It's a pretty tight episode.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Justifying Racism
PetiteGirafe14 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A white cop with a documented history of racism murders a black cop, goes on a racist rant, and then they try to justify it by saying he had poor vision. Brass was coddling him. Catherine was making excuses for the blatantly racist things he said. Greg treated a black witness like garbage. This guy shot a man in the back without even announcing himself at the scene at all because the man was black in a "bad neighborhood". And the show had the AUDACITY to use their tokenized black CSI (Laurence Fishbourne) to basically say it was okay and not racism. I know I shouldn't expect better from a cop show but this was just absolutely disgusting.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disappointing-a poor attempt at addressing the overt racism in law enforcement
gibson-alexis934 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I like CSI because they try their best to focus on the science. They should not have attempted this take on a racially motivated killing at the hand of a police officer.

Using the only Black character on your show as the person who says "cops don't shoot Black people because of racism" is simply in poor taste.

Also at the end of the episode they say "who's the bad guy here?" Pretty clear to me that it was the cop who was not physically fit for duty who murdered a man without identifying himself or the person he was firing at and made no attempt at de-escalation.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Copaganda
pnathan286 August 2021
Didn't realize how much this show is all about the thin blue line copaganda.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nothing has changed in 14 years
ambergale18 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Although this episode puts forth substantial effort in an attempt to disprove racism and wrong-doing from an armed hypocrite "sworn to uphold the law", it overwhelmingly shows how biased he actually was. It's the same mentality of most of the privileged people in the US that are enraged when called out as racist, yet display inappropriate behaviours and actions on a regular basis. It's almost as if it's inherent rather than a learned behaviour, allowed to persist as a law enforcement officer, which justifies the actions markedly in being supported by their superiors. Aired in 2009, it's only gotten worse in 2023. This episode earned a one out of ten for the preponderance of evidence to the contrary indicates that racism is prevalent within the Law enforcement community.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A perspective of the thin line between presumption, discrimination and human nature
viv_harv13 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Last Season was flagging in quality, hanging onto the coat tails of Grissom but this season, CSI is trying to pick up its flagging reputation, actually quality with an updated database of going-ons. CSI gave me some interest facts that maybe some people out of the US wouldn't know of. And though there isn't something fantastically new but characters are given a shine of their own without Grissom watching from the shadows.

I still get that Ray Langston being another version of Grissom but he easily catches your attention be it for the resemblance of his character of many's favourite Grissom (I hope) or that Laurence Fishbourne has the screen presence that can dim or at least keep up with the veteran cast of CSI. He may be the newest member but he is easily the one called upon by everyone, be it for the writer's choice or maybe to perk up the ratings.

Nonetheless, I like how the team is sort of building up this season and though Catherine is the head, she is more of a 'gather-around' head for exchange of ideas than 'You pose the problem, and I will do magic in instantly posing the answer, delegating tasks to do it and all will miraculously fall into place'. I notice, no one personally walks up to her with a problem but she is a sort of submerged head which makes a team of CSI working for the work, not for a man or woman. Funnily, even Eckley has come into sync.

Now about the topic at hand, I have to say I like this episode though the end was an empty triumph of sorts. A police-shootout turns dismal as the killed 'suspect' was a police officer who was not a threat. Racial motivation comes into play and may have the underlying reason to some extent but what interested me is how Laurence Fishburne's character was made to be objective and the understanding tolerant CSI who did his utmost to prove the shooting officer was not wholly responsible for what he did.

I never understand what would go through their minds, being of neither race but I would say it would be hard to hold Ray's untempered focus to find the direction the evidence pointed. It Did seem that most of CSI were trying to exonerate the shooting officer honourably be it whatever they say, but most CSIs were sort of tiptoeing around Ray.

The thing that hits the mark though is never said in words, are the victims' bound to their deeds and sense of duty, including the shooting officer's. It seems to say, no matter what you think, what you did or have done makes you the person in your mind. And if you are happy with that person, you are happy.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed