19-year-old Billy Lynn is brought home for a victory tour after a harrowing Iraq battle. Through flashbacks, the film shows what really happened to his squad - contrasting the realities of war with America's perceptions.
A young man who survives a disaster at sea is hurtled into an epic journey of adventure and discovery. While cast away, he forms an unexpected connection with another survivor: a fearsome Bengal tiger.
The Thrilla in Manila was the third and final boxing match between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier. It was contested in 1975 for the heavyweight championship of the world at the Philippine ... See full summary »
2-time Academy Award® winner Ang Lee brings his extraordinary vision to Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk, based on the widely-acclaimed, bestselling novel. The film is told from the view of 19-year-old private Billy Lynn (newcomer Joe Alwyn) who, along with fellow soldiers, is hailed as a 'hero' after a harrowing Iraq battle. He'is brought home for a victory tour. Through flashbacks, the film reveals what really happened to the squad - contrasting the realities of the war with America's perceptions. The film also stars Kristen Stewart, Chris Tucker, Garrett Hedlund, with Vin Diesel, and Steve Martin.Written by
Sony Pictures Entertainment
What would have the great Sidney Lumet done with such a topic?
I don't know what to say bout this movie. It is a story which I agree totally with, in his message. It is outrageous how the war vets are treated when they come back. If they are not ignored, ostracized or insulted - see for instance the Nam vets - they are used as tools, puppets to make money, used by sharks who intend to make big, big money at their own advantage over the poor soldiers. I agree with the message of this film which denounces this. But it is too big, it is caricature to me, too easy...See for instance Steve Martin, the ruthless and disgusting business man who uses the vets. The way Ang Lee has to show him - don't miss the takes on his eyes, shark eyes - made me sick, if I had a gun, I would have shot at the screen to kill him. I would say that is a didactic purpose. No nuance here, good guys again bad ones, and this is a shame. Sidney Lumet would have given something different from such a topic, no doubt about this.
13 of 22 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this