Pacific Rim: Uprising (2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
799 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
More geared toward kids this time around
amartin00725 March 2018
Although I did enjoy this movie, and it was a joy to watch on the big screen, the overall tone, and mood are so different from the first. The difference between fight scenes at night vs broad daylight may not seem like a big deal, but for some reason it really stood out to me. It just feels like this one was more geared toward kids, and potentially selling action figures. I didn't hate it by any means, but it really lacked what made the first one so unique, and intriguing to me.
186 out of 260 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Written and directed by Kaiju
kuarinofu23 March 2018
A sequel to a movie about giant robots fighting giant monsters. What was expected? Bigger robots fighting bigger monsters. The same thing with little tweaks - as most sequels do. What we got?

A product. A film generated by an AI. I wasn't there, but I assume it went something like this. The first meeting of the creators of this movie follows.

Ok, Google, what do modern kids like?

1. Robots (Transformers) 2. Scary cool monsters 3. Robots fighting monsters 4. Robots fighting robots 5. Memes from 2009 (Trololo sing) really? + memes from 2017 (the salt). 6. Horribly executed kid rebel subplots (Divergent, The Maze Runner, The Hunger games whatever) 7. Action 8. Forced drama? 9. Bad jokes?

Ok, let's take The Independence Day Resurgence's basic plot and fail miserably at everything. Done.

In other words, there is nothing in this movie besides action scenes. The plot lives on its own, there are no characters, and even their substitutes are completely disconnected from the dead plot. Nothing they do matter, it just follows typical cliches until the end. It even gets confusing at some point, but then you see the light at the end of the tunnel. It rushes the ending knowing that by this point nobody cares.

All the dialogue is cringe-worthy. Most of the actors are just having fun knowing that there's no need to get invested into anything here. Sadly, Scott Eastwood's face is stuck in one emotion and is unable to display anything else.

CGI crews did a good job, I guess. Looks fine. There's even one creative action scene involving buildings. Other than that the action is generic, even IMAX can't make it feel better. Maybe it would've been more impressive but the overabundance of CGI city destruction in modern blockbusters seriously lowers the threshold for getting impressed by CGI.

I'd compare this to a long video game cut-scene, but modern games have more character development and creative visuals in their cut-scenes. For instance, pretty much all Blizzard cut-scenes are visual masterpieces.

Final verdict: not entertaining on the big screen and a total waste of time for home viewing.
227 out of 348 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pacific Rim Downsized!!!
zardoz-1310 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Mind-numbing nonsense from fade-in to fadeout, "Pacific Rim Uprising" lacks the stellar cast and the suspenseful Armageddon melodrama of its outlandish but entertaining predecessor. Idris Elba as Stacker Pentecost and Charlie Hunnam as Raleigh Becket made "Pacific Rim" more than just a juvenile diversion in collateral damage and urban renewal. Comparatively, neither John Boyega nor Scott Eastwood musters enough magnetism in "Pacific Rim Uprising" to overshadow our heroic memories of Stacker and Raleigh. Everybody knows Stacker died in the original, so he was never coming back. Becket's absence is never adequately explained, though he might reappear in a later sequel. Meantime, "Pacific Rim Uprising" violates the first rule of all good sequels. Never should a heretofore untold character related to a franchise hero be invented to replace him. Meantime, everybody should recognize Boyega from his two recent "Star Wars" spectacles, while Clint Eastwood's son Scott has acquitted himself more than satisfactorily with supporting roles in "Fury" and "Suicide Squad." Boyega and Eastwood represent Hollywood's new blood. Sadly, they are hamstrung playing superficial characters with scarcely any complexity or charisma. The same shortcoming applies to the new breed of Jaeger pilots who comprise a politically-correct, multi-cultural coalition. Unknown actors and actresses all, they constitute a bland bunch with their petty rivalries. Boyega and Eastwood must whip these recruits into shape, so they can maneuver skyscraper-sized Jaegers on a dime. "Pacific Rim" came out in 2013, and five years would slip away before "Pacific Rim Uprising" emerged. Despite the gap in time between the original's release and its uninspired sequel, you'd think the filmmakers could have conjured up something with more imagination than a lame imitation of "Ender's Game" (2013). Basically, all director Steven S. DeKnight of Netflix's "Daredevil," freshman scenarists Emily Carmichael and Kira Snyder, and "Maze Runner" writer T.S. Nowlin do is grant the Kaiju a rematch. Along the way, they disperse the returning original characters, and the last-minute showdown never attains the impressive proportions of "Pacific Rim."

This formulaic follow-up takes place in 2030, ten years after the Kaiju defeat at the Battle of the Breach. Not only has peace and prosperity been restored during the intervening decade, but scientists have also converted the rock 'em, sock 'em Jaegers so they can be deployed like drones. DeKnight and his writers introduce Stacker Pentecost's insubordinate son, Jake (John Boyega of "Attack the Block"), but the son is nothing like his sire. Since the end of the Kaiju wars, dismantled Jaegers have been rusting away in scrap heaps. Some skeptics insist on being prepared for the return of the Kaiju. Thieves have catered to their paranoia by stealing Jaeger parts and selling them to these superstitious souls. Jake acquires his cash from pilfering these parts. Little does he know his principal competitor is an audacious, 15-year old orphan, Amara Namani (newcomer Cailee Spaeny), and she is beating him to those parts. Amara is assembling her own micro-sized Jaeger when Jake catches up with her. No sooner have they met than a real Jaeger thwarts her plans. Cutting a deal, Jake winds up back where he started before the Kaiju wars instead of behind bars. Former Jaeger copilot and old friend Nate Lambert (Scott Eastwood of "Diablo") needs Jake to help train the new Jaegar pilots. Instead of calling it "Pacific Rim Uprising," producer Guillermo del Toro and DeKnight should have named it "Pacific Rim: The Next Generation." Since she proved herself a decent pilot, Namani lands in the new cadet class, but not everyone likes her. According to Lambert, teens make better Jaeger pilots. Their youth, it seems, enables them 'to drift' better as co-pilots. If you haven't seen "Pacific Rim," the mind-melding ability to drift is indispensable for pilots to operate these gigantic robots in combat against the supernatural "Godzilla" lizards from another dimension. Drifting might also apply to the audiences' willing suspension of disbelief in matters of such caprice.

Meantime, Dr. Hermann Gottieb (Burn Gorman) and Dr. Newton Geiszler (Charlie Day), who enlivened the original with their feverish comic relief antics, are no longer friendly. Newt now works for the domineering Liwen Shao (Jing Tian of "The Great Wall") of the Shao Corporation, where he serves as her co-chief of the drone development program. The change in the relationship between Hermann and Newt provides the sole surprise in this mediocre sequel. Remember, these two nerds saved the day for Stacker and Raleigh in "Pacific Rim" because they drifted with a hideous Kaiju's mind. Hermann still suffers nightmares from the ordeal, while nitwit Newt has discovered the love of his life. Yes, he keeps a Kaiju brain preserved in a glass tank at his apartment, refers to her as Alice, and maintains what might be described as a Platonic relationship with it! Preposterous as this all seems, it might have been less bizarre if the filmmakers had brought back Ron Perlman's sinister Kaiju collector Hannibal Chau from the first film whose presence is sorely missed. Newt's infatuation with Alice, and the profit-motive resolve of Liwen Shao to implement drones over drift pilots makes her seem shady when a rogue Jaeger storms out of the ocean and annihilates Sidney, Australia. Apart from Hermann and Newt, the only other returning "Pacific Rim" character is Rinko Kikuchi's Mako Mori. Sadly, Mako has been demoted from piloting Jaegers and is sidelined to the status of a pencil-pushing administrator. Mako must approve Shao's drone pilot proposal before the Pan Pacific Defense Corps (PPDC) will institute it. Meaning, Mori doesn't survive long enough to make a difference.

Predictably, the fearsome alien Kaiju monsters arrive in the second hour to challenge the green Jaeger recruits. DeKnight orchestrates this last minute apocalyptic battle in Tokyo, with the usual collateral damage, while "Terminator Genisys" composer Lorne Balfe's bombastic score does more to heighten this slam-bang smackdown than its staging. Not even an intriguing cliffhanger ending is enough to make "Pacific Rim Uprising" seem more than a 'downsizing' of its far superior predecessor.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silly and bad story
Gordon-118 September 2020
The story is senseless and is very poorly told. I just don't know who is who, who is good or who is bad. It is so silly to see the characters running inside the robot to make the robot run. If technology is so advanced, couldn't they just make a neural link? The only good thing is that this time the film is in daylight, so at least I can see what is happening.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Could have been really good, but just misses the target slightly
illu226 March 2018
I absolutely love the original Pacific Rim. I felt that the film was a love letter for adults that love Robots fighting Aliens. The Monsters were unique and interesting. The fights were bone-crunching. The Sounds the Kaiju made were great.

Unfortunately, Pacific Rim: Uprising loses the gravity and heart of the first film and is really made for kids this time round. There are a few "cringey" moments and it all seems a lot more light-hearted. The storyline is ok but it feels like there is a great film in there and it just couldn't get out. Perhaps they should have spent a little longer improving the storyline and having slightly less kids.

Anyway, don't get me wrong, the action scenes are incredible and they are worth the admission price alone, but it feels like a missed opportunity. The ending also feels a bit rushed. I think I'll get the film when it comes out and just fast-forward all the talking bits and just watch the Robot action and Monster fights. That's where this film succeeds.
24 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pacific Rim Uprising: Big dumb fun round 2
Platypuschow14 January 2019
Pacific Rim (2013) was big, it was dumb, and it was oddly enjoyable but when I watched the trailer for Uprising it looked like 2hrs of stupidity painted liberally with cgi.

I'm not wrong often when it comes to these things, but I was wrong here. Uprising is stupid and it is heavy on the cgi (As it had to be I suppose) but it's also a lot of fun just like the first movie.

The cast however are mostly different and that's a very mixed bag. Scott Eastwood is awful, he's just the absolute pits and has no place in front of a camera. His father was dire initially as well, so if he follows suit with his father he'll be a bearable actor by around the age 60 mark!

Next we have John Boyega whose choice of roles explains why I'm not keen on him. He played a Storm trooper gone good in Star Wars, he was a chav moron in Attack the Block and here he's a criminal turned hero. Sorry but that just doesn't work for me, why is he always the good guy with bad roots?

And finally of those note worthy we have Cailee Spaeny who was excellent, very likeable, very talented and I hope this girl has a bright career ahead of her as based on this performance she deserves it.

The movie itself is exactly what you'd expect, it follows on well from the previous movie and adds to the universe well but ultimately is just dumb take your brain out over the top fun. And you know something, that's okay! Not every movie needs to be smart or well constructed, sometimes you just need to see big flashy cgi robots beating up big scary cgi monsters!

I hope there is a third (And probably final) movie to wrap things up. The franchise is never exactly going to produce outstanding movies but for simple silly fun they tick all the right boxes.

The Good:

Big dumb fun

Cailee Spaeny

The Bad:

John Boyega is simply not up to filling Idris Elba's boots

I struggle to get behind criminal protagonists

Scott Eastwood

Felt like it should have been longer
26 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another "Brats saving the world" film.
Nogami15 July 2018
Of course, adults are incompetent at doing anything to save the world, so the tweens must do it alone. Heard this plot line before? A thousand times? Of course you have. It's not any better this time.

You're not missing anything of substance by skipping this one. Just stick to the original and stay happy.
161 out of 200 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If you enjoyed the first one, you'll enjoy this one as well.
charioles21 March 2018
I'm a fan of the first movie so I watched this sequel as soon as it comes out. I checked out some info about the movie before watching it and was disappointed to see some of the main actors and even the director were replaced. But after watching it even with negative assumption, I was still awed nonetheless.

Simply said, if you enjoyed the first movie, then you'll most likely enjoy this one as well.

I noticed that this movie is more oriented towards children and uhm, manchild. Most of the parents I saw after exiting the cinema look just okay, while their children were very excited.

Don't watch this movie while expecting superb acting or stellar storyline, go watch it while expecting to see giant robots punching other giant robots and monsters. But hey, at least I can safely state that the plot and acting are still way way way better than the Transformer franchise.

In conclusion, this sequel lives up to its supposed expectation as the most awesome dumb movie (as said by Honest Trailer).

Man, this movie should have been named as Pacific Rim Next Generation: Dawn of Evangelion, With Transformers Involved.
56 out of 125 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I should stick to my plan not to watch sequels anymore.
peterp-450-29871617 August 2018
It does not matter who your parents are, where you came from, who believed in you and who didn't. We are a family now, and we are earth's last defense.

What amazed me the most was the fact that I couldn't remember much of "Pacific Rim", even though I thought it was an original-looking film years ago. No worries. Little by little everything is explained again in such a way that I partially knew it again. And even though "Pacific Rim" wasn't high-quality cinema and simply a very expensive monster film with superb looking computer-generated images, the film impressed me at the time. "Pacific Rim" was brainless amusement with a high entertainment value. This sequel is simply a duplicate with other main characters in identical Jaegers. But it's so irritating and annoying mostly. I was hoping this time the Kaiju's took control and destroyed planet earth. That way we don't need to be afraid of a possible sequel in the future.

Since the design and subject are identical to that of the initial film, one could say that it's thanks to Guillermo Del Toro the first film was kind of a success. But that's a bit simplistic to state, in my opinion. I rather think there are several factors that ensure that you can't really call this a successful film. This time the entire Jaeger program shifts from a mature world to that of teenagers. We end up in a cadet school where young people are trained to become Jaeger pilots. A bit like in "Ender's game" but now it's not in space. And of course, there's one of the cadets who can't stand the newcomer Amara Namani (Cailee Spaeny) and believes she doesn't belong there. And who will be the hero in the end? Yep, not hard to guess. Anyway, it all feels a bit like a kindergarten. The Goonies in giant robots who save the world. Haven't we seen that before?

Also, the acting wasn't something to get enthusiastic about. Cailee Spaeny was acceptable with her youthful enthusiasm and rebellious behavior. John Boyega sometimes played the indifferent Jake with reluctance. Scott Eastwood was again suitable for the character Nate. And not only because of that creepy resemblance to his famous father. But the acting by Burn Gorman, Charlie Day and Tian Jing was at times simply bad. Bad enough to make me squirm.

Only the graphical part remains. Just like the 2013 film, it's a visual spectacle. And just like the acting, there are also ups-and-downs here. It's fun to see huge robots and enormous monsters smashing into one another. But to be honest, it's the same old thing as in the previous movie. And the final battle in a Japanese city close to "Mount Fuji" just looked ugly. It wasn't as if this clash of the titans took place in between blocks of flats made from cardboard. Just like in those ancient Godzilla films. But it's a close call. The duel on the ice, on the other hand, looked extremely great. A computer-graphic masterpiece.

Do you like to watch huge robots and by extraterrestrial created monsters battle each other? Then I guess this film is right up your alley. Have you seen "Pacific Rim" years ago? Then you can safely skip this one because you won't be seeing something really new here. To be honest, I sometimes had the feeling that I was watching a modern version of the Power Rangers. Only the creatures who emerged from another dimension resembled those that the Power Rangers fought against a long time ago. Ridiculously long time ago.
182 out of 235 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Passable Sequel. Entertaining but unfulfilling in equal parts
ckpie22 March 2018
The movie has the robots, the badass fight scenes, the enjoyable cast of characters and all the makings of a fun time. For most part, it is. However, when compared to the first it lacks that certain reverence for its inspiration which shows most apparently when watching the action.

Character scenes aside, since the first was no winner in this department either, what Pacific Rim did amazingly well was craft gargantuan mechs and monsters that we can remember. Uprising almost feels like the director was following a checklist, but forgot to watch the first one to see how Del Toro put it all together to make it special. The result is a 'cool' and 'badass' robot v monster fight scene collection that ultimately fails to resonate.

As a sequel, it also fails to cover any new ground. This is most likely due to having to basically cast a whole new group of characters, give them scenes rather than simply starting off where the last left it. Consequently we don't really get too much more info in terms of what or how or why things happen, only that the Kaiju are coming again and we gotta stop them.

Pacific Rim Uprising fixed the pacing issues from the original, but thats about it. Otherwise, more doesn't always equal better sums it up pretty well. It IS still a fun watch, especially if Jaeger v Kaiju action was what you're looking for in the first place.
20 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
One dull, soulless uprising
TheLittleSongbird29 April 2018
Will admit to enjoying the first 'Pacific Rim'. It wasn't great or perfect as an overall film, and somewhat of a case of style over substance, but it entertained and did well on delivering on its objectives. The involvement of Guillermo Del Toro and Idris Elba are reasons enough to see the film

Really do wish that the same can be said for its sequel 'Pacific Rim: Uprising'. The trailer was not good and the reviews not great (one of the weaker received films of those released so far this year), but saw it anyway due to liking the first film enough and wanted to see something that was pretty much the same sort of thing quality-wise (and perhaps with improvements). No such luck. 'Pacific Rim: Uprising' turned out to be a dull and soulless sequel and film, and one that comes over as pointless at the end of the day.

Starting with what 'Pacific Rim: Uprising' excelled with, which sadly is not much, much of the cinematography and editing are slickly atmospheric, the production design is gritty and audacious and some of the effects are top-notch.

Some of the action and spectacle is exciting, they're big and over-the-top but appropriately so. John Boyega is a reasonable and charismatic lead and the only actor to come over well.

On the other hand, nowhere near as good a job is done with the direction, nowhere near as in command of or at ease with the material the action, making for a film that tries to be both silly fun and taking itself seriously but fails at both and neither gels. The film doesn't know what it's trying to be, it can be dully paced and target audience is not easy to figure out due to the film's muddled done.

Boyega aside, the acting is very bad, especially from Charlie Day and Burn Gorman who are as irritating as they were before. 'Pacific Rim: Uprising' also has some cringe-worthy, childish and vomit-inducingly inane dialogue and paper thin stereotypical characterisation (enough to tick off the long list of cliches one by one in quick succession) where not much is done to develop the characters and make one properly care for them. There are clumsy and unnecessary references to the first film too and there is too much exposition that really bogs things down.

Although there are instances of them being good, other effects are cartoonish. A lot of the action doesn't work, not very inventive and not always cohesive let alone exhilarating. A big case of a lot of noise and attempted style but not a lot of brains or soul. Worst of all is the story, which is dull, ridiculous, barely coherent and with a cobbled together glued badly feel and a complete lack of emotional investment.

Concluding, a mess apart from a few good things. 3/10 Bethany Cox
45 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For If You Like Giant Mechs and Monsters...
DudeMcDave23 March 2018
There are a lot of poor reviews on here from people expecting some high class masterpiece of emotion and intrigue it would seem. If you saw the first film or the trailer for this one and didn't expect PR: Uprising to be a big, dumb, loud battle royale then you're an idiot.

For those who DID enjoy the first film or who are fans of giant monster movies, humongous mechas, and Power Rangers in general you're probably going to find this film quite the trip.

While it does take some time to get going and makes several leaps of logic it is extremely entertaining and a highly serviceable continuation of the original, featuring some much improved Jaegers and a final battle that will absolutely blow you away.

Yes, it's stupid and fast paced, but so was the first and that was made by the great Del Toro, who's fingerprints are still very much all over this film if you look hard enough; just look at the names alone!

Just watch the film, turn off your brain and enjoy the ride. You'll thank me later...
166 out of 289 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Transformed
SnoopyStyle28 April 2018
It's been 10 years since the end of the original movie. With no more Kaiju, the world is trying to rebuild. Jake Pentecost (John Boyega) ran from his father's heroic legacy and lives on the edges of the rebuilding civilization. He deals in black market and tries to steal from a decommissioned Jaeger. He is scooped by street kid Amara Namani who builds her own mini-Jaeger. They get arrested and his stepsister Mako Mori recruits him back into the program. Amara joins the other young cadets training to be pilots under Nate Lambert (Scott Eastwood). Ruthless industrialist Liwen Shao is pushing for Jaeger drones controlled remotely by a single operator with bumbling Dr. Newton Geiszler (Charlie Day) working under her.

The Guillermo del Toro style has been scrubbed down and transformed. Jake is a less than compelling lead which is not that different from the original. It starts with a lot attitude and a lot of fronting. Boyega does save it by his sheer charisma. The first movie is a kiddie idea taken seriously with fun. This one takes that serious take and injects some kiddie jokiness. It literally adds a Robin-like character. The attempts at jokes annoyed me. The city destruction has a sterile feel. There is still some fun to be had and it is still robots fighting monsters.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
We SHOULD rise up against this kind of movies
siderite15 August 2018
Strangely enough, the quality of big blockbuster movies is reaching the point where they have the same level of quality as those of game cinematics. The acting part and the "story" are so forgettable that the CGI is all that remains. And the CGI is stupid. I mean, not bad, just completely dumb. I've seen this done real time in computer games. The creators of this movie bet big money on condescendingly telling their entire audience that they are cretins for watching and, of course, paying for this. The whole movie is stupid, not the CGI, the CGI is slightly more interesting.

And you might think that I am one of those haters, but I am not. I actually loved the actors and how they played. Imagine good actors, waiting and training their entire life to get into the big leagues, and when they get there they have to perform admirably... on a dumb script. I am not going through it, just consider this: the entire premise of the movie is that kaiju blood reacts violently with rare earth minerals. So all you need to do is shoot him with rare earth mineral bullets! It was that bad.
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's Giant Robots punching Giant Aliens, what more do you expect?!
liamkenny9127 March 2018
If you go into this film expecting anything more than sky-scrapper tall robots fighting with giant alien monsters, you've gone into it with the wrong mind frame to begin with. I would group this film in the same group as transformers, or fast and furious films (Switch-off films, if you will) - if you go into them looking for faults, you'll find them by the absolute truck load, but go in with a blank mind, you might be surprised by how much fun you can have.

John Boyega's charisma carries the film between the action scenes - his position and relationship in relation with Caliee Spaeny (who I was surprised to learn is 19 - she plays a 14-15 year old very convincingly), is established early on, and for the most part, works well. The supporting cast do what they have to - Scott Eastwood's character arc is predictable, but provides great moments of clarity.

I believe this film is definitely an improvement from the first - the big action moments are far easier to understand who is punching who, the lighting and colouring has been revised so that everything happens in daytime, which is great. Would I recommend this film? If you, like many others, go to the cinema to switch off for a couple of hours, this is a great film. It's not a film of subtilty or nuance, but if you can expect nothing more you'll have a great time.
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Transformers on steroids
trimblair28 March 2018
As an old fan-boy, I enjoyed it. It wasn't really new ground but it was well done with a solid plot and strong climax at the end. I see them making more and people buying tickets. This is the Pokémon of this generation.
19 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pointless, just re-watch the original
eddie_baggins21 November 2018
I'm not sure there's too many people out there who would call Guillermo Del Toro's 2013 robot/monster infused popcorn event Pacific Rim a classic of any sort but the eye-candy clad and seriously entertaining experience looks like a genuine masterpiece when placed alongside this charmless and trite sequel.

Somehow turning the prospect of giant robots and oversized monsters going at each other in a battle of life and death into an utterly boring and tiresome exercise, Pacific Rim: Uprising is the early death knell to a series that should've been a brand name that became the perfect excuse to turn your brain off and enjoy some big screen spectacle that is home to cheesy one liners, over the top CGI infused carnage and some A-listers hamming it up for good measure.

Taking over directing duties from Del Toro, debut feature film director Steven S. DeKnight brings none of the child like charm or enthusiasm the Mexican auteur brought to the table with his entry as we instead get a lame and tame tale of Idris Elba's Stacker Pentecosts' child Jake (played by a struggling John Boyega) turn from troublemaker to Jager pilot, as the world finds itself once more under threat from the dreaded Kaiju monsters.

The first Pacific Rim had a similarly dumb plot and characters that were more like walking caricatures but there was a sense that everyone involved was having a great time and despite better judgements, you as an audience member did to.

That's completely lost here, there's little fun to be had with the bland and uninteresting action scenes, the main cast are all completely forgettable, while even returning cast members such as Charlie Day's Dr. Newton Geiszler and Burn Gorman's Hermann Gottlieb are more of a tacked on accessory, with Day in particular getting an embarrassing character development that is both lame and totally misguided.

With a pulse-free plot line and thrill-free action there was little chance Uprising ever had at succeeding and there's little mystery as to why this unwanted sequel failed to capture the dollars at the box-office, guaranteeing the Pacific Rim brand is now dead in the water.

Final Say -

Not even the most hardcore of Pacific Rim fans will find much to enjoy in Uprising, an utterly forgettable and disposable new entry into the wannabe franchise that somehow manages to turn it's over the top foundations into a bland, charm-free and tiresome event.

1 child mechanic out of 5
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Felt like I was watching transformers
packor6 July 2018
And in fact, it is just as good as transformers. That's not really saying much.

The problem with the Transformers series and Pacific Rim is that they are really just action movies dressed up with robots. Transformers attempts to spice up the mech genre by having them do acrobatics and fancy, unrealistic combat moves. They look like ninja turtles or those kangaroos from Warriors of Virtue, except they're giant robots. Pacific Rim doesn't have the fancy flipkicks, but it suffers from the same dilemma: they fight just like humans.

You have to ask yourself, if you just want to see moves, why don't you just go watch a martial arts film? It has much better action sequences that isn't bogged down by "slow, clunky movement" becsuse "robots". Or if you want to see high tech weapon suits performing great looking feats, most anime do it much better. In fact, in Pacific Rim one, the fighting scenes between the pilots was hugely superior to the robot scenes.

Let's be real. What's the real reason you watch robots films. You want to be wowed by amazing technology. Neither Transformers nor Pacific Rim deliever. All you have are robots performing fancy human looking feats and fancy looking human weapons.

Throw in your plot, and both series have decent plots, and voila m, giant robot movie. But that's all they are. There is no wow. They may as well have been standing still for the whole movie. Decent alien invadion plot with plot twists that can somewhat keep you guessing. Sci fi wow factor is almost zero. Robot wow factor is low. They feel like first generation robots, which is boring. The plot for the second story is not as good as the first. The fighting scenes are better which makes this one slightly better.

In conclusion, decent action film, with robots as substitutes for humans.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One Big Mistake
Luca_Rachiteanu2 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Story/Plot: This sequel offers a story with a far more complex plotline. The plot twist is unexpected and believable. The return and use Kaiju is quite clever if I might say.

Casting: Before mentioning the elephant in the room, I also have to mention the acting of Charlie Day and Cailee Spaeny (no need to mention the already acknowledged John Boyega). Their performances are spot on, always fitting well with the character and situation; their roles, in my humble opinion, were the hardest to handle.

The CGI problem: While both the script and casting was done impeccably, the main problem presents itself with the CGI motion and choreography of action scenes. The first movie understands the motion of the fictional machinery it depicts and creates the choreography accordingly, for example the weight of a moving robot which is the size of a building and how would such a robot move around (I assure you that not easily or lightly). Pacific Rim: Uprising fails to recreate the eye-catching fight scene methods used in the first movie and thus fails to entertain because it lacks the quality which made it successful. Hope if there will be a third movie, the production team will be considerate of our wishes.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Real disappointment....
najouamalih28 April 2018
I have been waiting for this one for quite some time, but what a disappointment ... this film is for kids, all actors are kids.
166 out of 231 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Leave your brain at home, sit back, relax and enjoy
mukool-hastak22 March 2018
Story: 5/10

Character development: 4/10

Dialogue: 3/10

Plot consistency and general common sense: 2/10

And yet i enjoyed the movie. Why? Because the above points are not why this movie is made.

Action: 10/10

Visuals / CGI: 10/10

Giant robots and giant monsters beating the shit out of each other in awesome fight sequences: 10/10

not to mention: Ellen Mclain's (GLaDOS) voice: 10/10

That's why you watch this movie. If you expected anything else, that's your problem.

Leave your brain behind. Brush aside the various glaring potholes and just enjoy some good old fashioned Jaeger-on-Kaiju action. That's what the first one was. This one is simply more of the same.
71 out of 124 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not good as the first one. Disappointed but still love it.
wowppl26 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Pacific Rim is sure my best favorites movie . Cannot count how much I watched it (30+ at least) . It has been 5 years waiting from the 1st movie . Before I watch Pacific Rim uprising , there are something I wish to see, just like other fans, based on the passion n love to the 1st film :

Things that I hope for uprising before see it Great action and more fight scene. Great music n must have the original theme song appear. Seeing old characters from the 1st movie . Even more great design of Jagers n Kaiju . Good script as the 1st movie which balance or even improve each major character 's storyline n the time of flight . Same level of artistic image that we see in 1st movie .

Same as some other comment , lots of the key elements above are not seen in uprising which is disappointed to me. While I do understand as a new director to the sequel , it's hard to compare , or even surpass to the creator who is gifted n carry much amount of love to the Kaiju n the unique Universe he made .

My comment n feeling about uprising : Director is trying to please the fans n expand the fans to lower age people like kids. It seems to me that they are looking after oversee boxes office performance especially to China , while try to cover up their intention by the concept of "all counties to save all people". There are more fight scene than the 1st one which is good . The 1st two flights with Obsidian Fury are great . Original music is found in uprising (but it is very short ) . Three old characters are back(but Mako only show up a short time), Mako 's script is not short ,compare with those new cadet who even dun have a word to say . Storyline is okay especially the villain twist is a surprise to me. Weight on Jager is still found in some scene, at least not 100% transformer style. I can understand Jager has upgraded so can accept for moving faster . Compare with Mark V Striker Eureka in the 1st movie, Mark V n VI Jager speed in uprising is understandable.

Things that I like in uprising: Amara 's drift which tell her story ,echo to the one of Mako in 1st movie. Machine gears in the Jager's leg when moving ,align with 1st movie 's attention to physic (but not much) . Newton, Jake n Mako's good performance . Idea of Villain twist in uprising. The truth of Obsiden Fury pliot Nice CGI n metal texture found in the Jager . Vortex gun of Bracer Phoenix n the ability of shoot from the back . Good utilization of 3 man's ride .

Things that I dislike in uprising : Less unique in the new Jager . When compare with the 1st movie . Too much Chinese element in the movie, even the storyline tells it is happening in China n engaged with a China tech company. If this movie is to bring message of all people to save all mankind, why we dun see someone say Japanese/ Korean/Spanish in the movie ?

The drift is too easy , especially for those trainee cadet . Everyone is drift compatible ? No special for a 3 man's drift in Bracer Phoenix, even they are not triplets ?

Out of focus to the Kaiju. Appearance too short . No highlight their faces n scary outlook like the one for knifehead .I can't even remember the faces of those three , Raijin is a bit better .

Compare with Stacker introduction in the Shatterdome, no or only little introduction to Cadet faces n Jager. I only remember the Russian girl n the Chinese muscle boy ,Indian boy but no others.

Jake's speech to the Cadet before final fight is not good as his father. May be it's too good from Idris Elba...

Fighting too fast in the last battle, cannot catch up the scene. But I can catch every action in the 1st movie.

Trailer aldy release more than 50% of the fight scene in the movie !

Wrong timing of 1st movie 's theme song. Too short as well .I can't remember any piece of the uprising music . Means no signature sound like in the 1st movie . Del toro make this specific requirement to Ramin Djawadi by a few pitches. Apparently uprising fails on this part .

Transition of Jake is too fast. Cannot fully explain why he changes his mind from the beginning.

Skipping the moment of combined big kaiju died from the hit of Gpisy Avenger . I dun even see how the Kajiu died .

Guardian Bravo fall out n hit the car for ringing, what is that about ? I dun fell it a kind of salute to the 1st movie. If you do that in such a way, I prefer u save the time for character 's story telling instead.

Only single weapon of Guardian Bravo(electric wrip) n Saber Athena (twin blade) . I can't believe how they can be VI Jager if have only one way to attack . Titan redeemer fall down too easy . A kind of waste of his design n appearance.

Need a bit more scene to explain how the Kajiu mind control the drone. Cannot fulling understand it .

Idea that I suggest or hope to see in 3rd movie , if any. More detail fighting with Kaiju like in 1st movie , or like the one fighting with Obsidian Fury , with weight feeling of the massive weight of a Jager.

Stacker ,Mako reappearance in Jake's drift with Raleigh (if he's back) .Finding some message which they don't know about before .

Assign background story to the main Cadet . e.g. Russian girl something to do with Cheno Alpha's pilot .

A moment like Gpisy sword 1st appearance in the 1st movie , Otachi show her wing expand n fly . Giving surprise to the audience.

No spoiler trailer please. It's too much for uprising .

Overall I rated 7/10 marks to uprising. This include my love to the franchise , appreciation to the effort of production crew, nice fight scene in the movie and the understanding of there may be no one can surpass Del toro 's work , except himself
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another kiddyfied sequel..
visureigis18 May 2018
Whats with the Hollywood lately? They take decent adult movies and make sequals for kids. They ruined Iron Man, now they ruined Pacific Rim, etc.

Unless you are kid, avoid the sequel and rewatch the original, you will enjoy much more.
96 out of 132 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty much like its predecessor but, doesn't match up to it.
Anurag-Shetty25 March 2018
Pacific Rim: Uprising is set ten years after the events of Pacific Rim(2013). Jake Pentecost(John Boyega) is the son of Stacker Pentecost. Jake has to save the world, with a bunch of new recruits & his partner Nate Lambert(Scott Eastwood), from a new Kaiju threat.

Pacific Rim: Uprising is a good film that, could have been so much better. Director Steven S. DeKnight doesn't successfully take over directorial duties from Oscar-winning filmmaker, Guillermo del Toro. Some of the dialogues in the movie, are cringe-worthy & unintentionally funny. The visual effects are good. The action set pieces are the highlight of the film. The 3D is effective. The performances suffer, due to the poor script. John Boyega is great as Jake Pentecost. Scott Eastwood is superb as Nate Lambert. Cailee Spaeny is spectacular as Amara Namani. Newcomer Spaeny outshines all her co-stars. Burn Gorman is great as Dr. Herman Gottlieb. Charlie Day is hilarious as Dr. Newton Geiszler. Tian Jing is brilliant as Liwen Shao. Jin Zhang is effective as Marshal Quan. Adria Arjona & Rinko Kikuchi are awesome as Jules Reyes & Mako Mori, respectively. Karan Brar, Wesley Wong, Ivanna Sakhno, Mackenyu, Lily Ji, Shyrley Rodriguez, Rahart Adams & Levi Meaden are impressive as, Cadet Suresh, Cadet Jinhai, Cadet Viktoria, Cadet Ryoichi, Cadet Meilin, Cadet Renata, Cadet Tahima & Cadet Ilya, respectively. Pacific Rim: Uprising is not a must watch. However, watch it if you're a massive fan of Pacif Rim(2013). Just keep your expectations incredibly low.
15 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pacific Rim: Uprising of lost money
sefrafer25 March 2018
Most of us who watch these movies are fans of the giant robot stories (mecha) of incredible animated series like gundam, evangelion and of course Mazinger z is that far from the robots and the incredible fights is that there is an interesting plot, a story that plunges us into the worlds created for them, and this second part does not have an interesting story to tell, and this may be because its director Steven S. DeKnight is his first film and although he knows how to do entertaining series, he does not know how develop a plot in the short term, do not know how a character develops in 2 hours of film and definitely do not know how to balance the humor in the plot, the film hurts the clear image that the first tape had, the created universe was thrown overboard for Guillermo del toro, you know that the thing is going wrong since we changed to Warner for Universal, the details that made the film great are no longer there, but CGI does not make it better in fact Aijus are too inferior and the story of his return has larger plot gaps than the Jaggers, if there is something good is the actors who do their work John Boyega and Scott Eastwood do a very good job but it is not enough to save a movie that only offers entertaining moments, but not memorable in the long run will become what transformers is for Michael Bay just a movie to make money and not to give us how original it was.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed