The Looming Tower (TV Mini Series 2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
114 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Complex, intelligent, and sobering; superb television
Bertaut17 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Based on Lawrence Wright's 2006 book, The Looming Tower tells the story of how the 9/11 attacks were made possible by the internecine squabbling between the CIA and the FBI. However, whereas the majority of the book deals with al-Qaeda, the series focuses almost exclusively on the American perspective, which makes sense as it's an American show with American financing aimed at an American audience. Certainly, there are depictions of some of the terrorists; but this is an American story. And although the binary of CIA=bad/FBI=good is too neat, and there is a series dearth of information on al-Qaeda, this is sobering TV, which is at its best when it shows us how easily these events could have been prevented.

Although framed by the 9/11 Commission in 2004, the story begins in 1998. Both the CIA and FBI each have a dedicated "bin Laden unit". The CIA's Alec Station is run by Martin Schmidt (Peter Sarsgaard playing a thinly-fictionalised Michael Scheuer), whilst the FBI's I-49 is run by John O'Neill (Jeff Daniels). Each unit is required to share intelligence with the other, but, in reality, neither shares much of anything except insults. In between the two is Richard Clarke (Michael Stuhlbarg), National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism. As the show begins, Ali Soufan (Tahar Rahim), a Muslim Lebanese-American, has just been assigned to I-49, and shortly thereafter, bin Laden (referred to primarily as UBL) is interviewed for ABC News, promising a grand statement unless the US pull out of the Middle East. But with the Monica Lewinsky scandal in full-swing, the country's attention is elsewhere.

The Looming Tower was developed for TV by Wright, Dan Futterman, and Alex Gibney. An element to which it returns time and again is how both the Clinton and Bush administrations underestimated UBL. This is initially touched on in the first episode, "Now it Begins... (2018)", after the ABC interview, with Soufan telling O'Neill, "he used the interview to appear strong by threatening the United States as he looked an American directly in the eye." With a semen-stained dress to worry about, however, no one pays much attention. Subsequently, in the fourth episode, "Mercury (2018)", Soufan explains, "al-Qaeda is not going to be defeated by simply gunning down the boss. To them, martyrdom is the purest kind of poetry. It's beyond poetry. It's eternity. Each time we snuff a part of it out, it'll keep resurfacing. It goes that deep. Killing Bin Laden is only going to secure his legend and inspire more and more martyrs." The theme of failing to understand the nature of the threat comes up again later in the same episode when Schmidt proposes bombing a bird hunt that might include bin Laden, and O'Neill counters, "within days, there will be a million more recruits ready to sign up. Do you even understand the concept of martyrdom? This isn't a war about one man. Bin Laden is an ideologue, not some plutocrat running a banana republic. His people actually believe. It's bin Laden-ism we're up against, not just bin Laden."

This tendency to underestimate UBL becomes even more pronounced under the Bush presidency, leading to some of the show's best scenes. In the eighth episode, "A Very Special Relationship (2018)", shortly after her appointment as Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice (Eisa Davis) interrupts Clarke as he is giving a presentation on al-Qaeda, telling him, "when you put something in writing, if you want it to get to the President, keep it pithy." A later scene in the same episode has a similar tone as Rice meets with Clarke, CIA Director George Tenet (Alec Baldwin), Schmidt's right-hand woman Diane Marsh (Wrenn Schmidt), and O'Neill, at which O'Neill is stunned when Rice asks him who he is. It's an extraordinarily well-written scene, and the only time we see O'Neill lost for words, with Daniels nailing his utter incredulity at her not knowing his name.

Another major theme is faith. However, the show is less interested in the blind devotion of UBL's followers than in the lapsed faith of O'Neill and Soufan. O'Neill's loss of faith deeply troubles Liz (Annie Parisse), one of his two mistresses, who's a practising Catholic, and who believes him (incorrectly) to be divorced. This is rendered even more complicated when he's told that to marry Liz in the church, he must first nullify his marriage to Maria (Tasha Lawrence), who's an even more stringent Catholic than Liz, and doesn't believe in divorce. In "Mercury", he asks a cardinal, "you sure there's not some little crack in the magisterium that would allow Maria to maintain her good standing?" However, he's told, "well if you were to die".

In regards Soufan's faith, although he's initially introduced as no longer practising Islam, the faith-based nature of al-Qaeda's ideology deeply troubles him ("when people use my religion to justify this s**t, it affects me"). Indeed, one of the most welcome elements of the show is that although there isn't a huge amount of time spent depicting the Muslim community, there are a few scenes that give a positive presentation, such as a social gathering in "Mercury" where Islam is barely even mentioned. Even some of the terrorists are given interesting context, much of which challenges the notion that all Muslims subscribe to Islamic fundamentalism; for example, Hoda al-Hada (July Namir), who is married to one of the hijackers, doesn't subscribe in any way to her husband's belief in UBL. Instead, she's more concerned with her young children knowing their father than the otherworldly blessings of Allah.

When it comes to the acting, the show excels, with Bill Camp (playing Robert Chesney, one of O'Neill's most reliable agents) and Michael Stuhlbarg as the standouts. Camp is given an amazing scene in "Mistakes Were Made (2018)" when he interrogates Mohamed al-Owhali (Youssef Berouain) in the wake of the bombing of the US embassy in Nairobi. An eight-minute scene of two men just sitting in a room, Camp is quiet and calm, fondly remembering his military service, drawing al-Owhali in, gaining his trust, making him comfortable, before exploding at the right moment. It's an extraordinarily well-acted, well-directed, and well-edited scene, and a masterclass in dramatic pacing. Although Stuhlbarg plays Clarke as perennially frustrated, he never lets his quiet politeness slip, although on several occasions, he hovers tantalisingly close. He's especially good in a scene late in "9/11 (2018)", after the attacks have happened, and Rice tells him, "Rumsfeld wants the attacks linked to Saddam Hussein and Iraq." This, of course, is an allusion to the illegal war pursued by the Bush administration after 9/11, itself a narrative of American incompetence, ineptitude, and arrogance, and Clarke's simple "what did you say", his voice subtly modulating, is as important a moment as the series has.

Elsewhere, Daniels plays O'Neill as boisterous and foul-mouthed, who doesn't care about the feathers he has to ruffle to get what he wants. Sarsgaard, on the other hand, plays Schmidt as the pretentious polar opposite; calm, patient, and insidious. Whereas O'Neill is all passion and rage, Schmidt is cold and emotionless.

Of course, the show does have problems. For one, there's almost nothing on why al-Qaeda hated the US so much (one of Wright's main themes), and literally nothing on the group's background. This kind of context is hugely important to any depiction of al-Qaeda, so for the series to offer us nothing on their origins is disappointing.

Elsewhere, a subplot in the first episode sees Chesney strike up a romantic relationship with Deb Fletcher (Sharon Washington), chief of station for the US embassy in Nairobi. The storyline is intended to give us an emotional connection to the bombing, but the plot is tonally divorced from everything surrounding it, coming across as emotionally inauthentic. Along the same lines, the show is at its weakest when depicting O'Neill's labyrinthine personal life, Soufan's relationship with his girlfriend Heather (Ella Rae Peck), and the tentative romance between Schmidt and Marsh. Much of this material feels rote and generic, romantic subplots forced into the story so as to counter the testosterone-soaked main narrative (although to be fair, Scheuer did marry Alfreda Bikowsky, on whom Marsh is partly based).

The most egregious problem, however, is the rigid binary distinction between the FBI and the CIA, wherein the FBI are the honourable team players whilst the CIA are the paranoid and duplicitous pseudo-villains, a distinction personified in O'Neill and Schmidt, and which never feels completely authentic. O'Neill was far from perfect, but Schmidt is a dishonest, permanently smirking jerk, convinced of his own genius. To be fair, there can be little argument that Scheuer is a toxic and thoroughly arrogant individual, but there's also some nuance that Schmidt doesn't possess.

Nevertheless, The Looming Tower is taut, complex, and politically fascinating. Sure, the story is streamlined and simplified, but even so, it hasn't been drained of moral complexity, as it serves as a reminder of something with great importance today - with UBL literally telling the US that he was going to attack, everyone was focused on how a cigar was used as a toy. And living, as we do, in an era where the American media is routinely distracted by irrelevancies, it seems the lessons of history have not been heeded.
82 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fascinating insight yet tragic for the entire world
Ed-Shullivan16 July 2019
Who could ever fathom that the main reason the terrorists of al-Qaeda lead by the independently wealthy Osama bin Laden would have cost so many lives to be lost in the air attacks that occurred on September 11th, 2001, could have been neutralized only if the American CIA and FBI intelligence agencies would have shared vital information between their respective and unfortunate independent intelligence operations.

This is a well acted ten (10) part mini-series that is based on actual events and many of the key American and foreign personnel who were actively involved in the gathering of intelligence on terrorists such as al-Qaeda.

Mrs. Shullivan and I were glad to see that much of the horrific events that occurred on September 11th, 2001, were not the focus of this mini-series, but rather how the events leading up to this tragic day in the history of mankind evolved over the preceding years and by the key players responsible for fighting the terrorists organizations such as al-Qaeda.

This is most definitely a must see. A 9 out of 10 rating
25 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amazing
sterlingmastif5 January 2020
Totally engrossing series. Like an extended Zero Dark Thirty prequel. Absolutely excellent.
24 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I subscribed to network just for this series.
WVfilmfem18 April 2018
I had to watch the whole series twice, mainly to identify the "good" and "bad" players. It certainly doesn't speak well of the CIA. Amazing performances, by all players, but Jeff Daniels and Tahar Rahim were outstanding. Curious about Ali Soufan, I watched several interviews with him, and Tariq nailed his accent/speech totally. We all know how it ended, but this series adds to the human element, the frustration and ultimate sadness.
101 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A chance to feel
jshoaf21 April 2018
The last episode, which begins when the first plane hits (not a spoiler), brought me up against my own memories of 9/11. My son was in the city, and on that day I worried about him and listened to him on the phone. Aside from that, I was numb. It seemed utterly incomprehensible that this should have happened. Who? Why? How? Equally incomprehensible was the speed with which these questions were in fact answered, for reasons the Hulu series makes clear: the answers were already at the fingertips of various players who didn't know what to do with them (though the finale implies that various parties were prepared to exploit the bombing instantly). The series begins at the (or a) beginning, including the Kenyan embassy bombing, the USS Cole bombing, and interactions among the players on both sides. The questions have been answered, the lines drawn in such a way as to meet at this point, with the bombings. As I watched the last episode, I was able to feel for the people I love who were breathing that dust that day. I could finally weep for them, as well as for John O'Neill and Ali Soufan, whom I had not known about until now.
53 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I hope we are doing it different now, I fear we are not
rremmele8 April 2018
Aside from the excellent way it showed how the CIA and the FBI would not work together, they both had bad ideas of how to handle it. The CIA was mostly academic and the FBI was mostly just knock down doors. Both had the wrong prescription. I hope they are all doing it differently and together, but I fear that they are not. Bush didn't want to be "batting at flies" and I fear that Trump doesn't want to either.

Condaleesa Rice's comment after the Twin Towers that "no one would have thought that someone would do that" is particularly galling, because in fact a person on her staff who was the old Security Advisor would have told her just that if she ever took time to listen and take him seriously. History should really reconsider what it is now saying about her in light of these revelations.

The timing of the episodes seem perfectly timed to what was going on. It showed how we really didn't have much of a clue and the lack of sharing made each less knowledgeable and less able to get the needed incite.
30 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What the miniseries format was made for.
shoobe01-122 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Absolutely worth it. Set aside the time, watch it all. Pay attention and it pays off in spades. A full-on stick with it, it really gets there series.

And if you watch it all, a stunning tour de force. I knew essentially everything in here, but this is what dramatic re-enactments are for. They lend emotional weight and credence to the tale that you have known, even 20 years later. I knew the well-known story of John O'Neill spending his career hunting AQ then just weeks after being pretty much drummed out of the FBI was killed in WTC2 shortly after taking a job there as head of security. But getting to know this guy, seeing him frustrated and colluded against, flaws and all, just to be killed for his efforts is something else entirely.

Everyone should watch this, not just because it's so well done, but because the events have changed the fabric of the earth - not just of the politics and law of the US - and so often as we see here due to mistakes, mismanagement, politics, corruption, egos and other stupid, stupid reasons.
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Arabic Dialect!
insider_ksa4 January 2020
The whole series was fine, as other reviews suggest. As an Arab, it is irritating to see all the Arabic language spoken in this series was from an egyption Dialect, regardless of their origin/nationality.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Compelling
pking-494571 February 2022
A great insight into the self serving American bureaucracy and their buck passing.

I am stunned that the security of American citizens was in control of so many egomaniacs. Absolutely no flow of communication between anyone.

It is remarkable, considering the amount of intelligence that was harnessed, that this occurred and that the death toll wasn't greater.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good show, but not as great as the book
paolo-severini-11 April 2018
When I read that there was a TV adaptation of Lawrence Wright's book I had great hopes. The result is not disappointing, the show is quite good, Jeff Daniels is perfect in his role and the story of John O'Neill is perfect for a movie. But the writers decided to focus only on the final part of the book, which details the internal wars between CIA and FBI which allowed the 9/11 plans to proceed unchallenged. The first part of the book, which describes the history of bin Laden and al Qaeda, starting from the ideology of Qutb, would have been much more interesting to understand what is going on in the world today. But I understand that story would be perhaps more suitable for a documentary than for a TV show, but it's a story that Wright wrote beautifully at that will deserve to be put on screen someday.
36 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Thoughtful Take on the Rise of Jihadism
pseawrig18 March 2018
I started watching this show because Jeff Daniels always delivers. He continues to do so here.

The miniseries presents a thought provoking picture of how the CIA and the FBI had conflicting ideas about how best to oppose Al Qaeda in the late 1990s and 2000. It suggests that these agencies' inability to work together created opportunities for Jihadism to fester and grow. This part of the series is powerful and well realized.

Less interesting are its forays into the private lives of its main characters. I'm 4 episodes in and still don't get the point of these subplots. I see how these interludes show the softer and messier sides of these characters lives, but they don't seem to have anything at all to do with the larger story of Al Qaeda's rise. As a result, these parts feel like filler in what would otherwise be a very tight, well focused political drama.

That said, this show does a fine job of assessing where our country's intelligence agencies, media, and citizenry succeeded and where we failed when it came to Al Qaeda. It's a sobering and fascinating story. As I watch, I keep thinking, "How did our world manage to get so very screwed up!"
55 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Outstanding & underrated
johnwiu6 December 2020
If you have not seen this please do so... now. Do not give up after 1, 2 or 3 episodes & then be that guy who gives this a 5, 6 or 7 on the scoreboard. Watch it all the way through because it gives you a much different perspective on how things went down. Of course it isn't perfect, but I don't think a better job could have been done. Especially the guy who plays Ali who kinda makes me look at Islam as a whole in a much more peaceful, wholesome way as a Christian.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Comment on the last episode Warning: Spoilers
Last episode was great . I just wanted to comment on agent Ali Sofan's conversation or interrogation for Al-Qaeda member in the last episode after Sept. 11th attacks took place . Jihadist are not that naive nor that easy to persuade that they are mistakenly understanding Qur'an & Hadeeth even when debating with another Muslim . They are extremely stubborn & they never admit guilt or fault .. They always insist that their understanding for the holy book is the right one & that any other Muslim with any other explanation is faithless .. I don't see this in the scene although it was very well acted/performed .

Also as an Arab I'd like to say that in general (in the whole series) they had to work more on Arabic script & not just settle for translating what they wrote in English cause it sounds kind of shallow most of the time
20 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Lead Up to 9-11, Combined With Soap Opera Romance
silence-2622 March 2018
I'm both a Jeff Daniels fan and something of a political junkie, and so I really was looking forward to The Looming Tower. It's an engrossing story, but for the life of me I can't understand why they felt the need to muck it up with soap opera-ish romance filler.Did we really need to know about everyone's affairs, or the budding romantic relationships experienced by on-the-go government agents? How in the world did the writers conclude that such fodder would be necessary in order to keep people interested in the events that led to 9-11? The history of this great American catastrophe really needed some romantic spice to keep people's interest? I don't know what the writers were thinking, but they took magnetic subject matter, and some terrific actors, and seemed to have made a mess of it with soap opera silliness.
90 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining
mageh2 March 2018
Very much like Homeland style. Quite entertaining. The only more entertaining thing is the reviews of other people here imagining all the conspiracy theories.
56 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great series but who wants to see Jeff Daniels having sex every episode?!
katieburton-7430128 September 2022
Fantastic show, great script and acting. Looses a point for the unnecessary sex scenes every episode with Jeff Daniels having sex with different woman. Shows the failures within the Government and complete lack of transparency between the FBI and the CIA and the Government's unwillingness to take the time to understand the implications and complexities of the Middle East which as we know the West is still in 2022 facing the repercussions of with terrorist attacks such as domestic and recently ISIS. Pacing is good but could have been better without so much for focus on Jeff Daniels sexual affairs.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Superb Drama with Lots of Tension
leftbanker-115 March 2018
So we all know now that the CIA screwed up royally. We knew all of the 9/11 characters way before that infamous date. Because two American agencies couldn't act like adults a team of terrorist losers were running around the USA doing whatever they wanted. This is now a historical fact.

I love how they give the moronic coverage of the Monica Lewinsky "scandal" as holding precedence over these matters vital to national security. Republicans investigated Clinton for eight solid years. Imagine if they had put even a fraction of that effort into fighting terrorism.

I don't love how they accentuate the sex side of the story, even when it really isn't part of the story. Does anyone really want to see a very old Jeff Daniels as a gigolo? We get it, the guy was a complete sociopath when it came to women, but we don't need or want to know it.

The actor playing Richard Clark is a dead ringer. I'm glad they painted him to be the hero he was.

Tahar Rahim was a brilliant choice to play Ali Soufan, a guy whose career I have followed since reading a great article in the New Yorker about him and the U.S.S. Cole bombing (Query: The Agent New Yorker).

Every single actor, at every step in the narrative is excellent, and more importantly, believable.

Very accurate portrayal of life in Yemen and the investigation of the Cole bombing.

The final interrogation with Ai Soufan and the former bodyguard for UBL was masterful and a perfect way to end the series.
34 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great show!!
cagdas-21-31507325 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Great show indeed!!! Especially the last episode was awesome - when Agent Soufan showed that Al-Qaeda is nothing but a bunch of maniacs who don't know the first thing about Islam - or humanity for that matter!!!
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Solid performances in an interesting expose
robertemerald1 October 2018
Jeff Daniels was a revelation to me in The Newsroom .... fast, exciting, punchy, intelligent .... so I came to this show with that impression as something of a bias. I wasn't disappointed. Just as with The Newsroom there are dramatic fillers with relationships that run parallel to the main story, so here as well, but such relationships are relevant for the most part, or just down right interesting if not. The show starts with an advantage given that this drama is based on fact. It doesn't disappoint, we see how law enforcement and terrorist goals evolve, we see human frailty, and we see the tragedy. To me, that is why we need such shows, perhaps as much as we need written history, and freedom to enjoy them in an open society. I can honestly say that I found it difficult not to move on to the next episode, even as the hour crept beyond my own sensible viewing time.

High quality professional drama and this year's must see.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What a sobering piece. From Australia!
sammaclean11 November 2019
As an Australian, to this day - surrounded still by 9/11 sceptics, I will happily use this fantastic dramatisation to aid and abet the sentiment that this event was perpetrated by those who feature in this series - as I believe was the case.

I will note however that this sentiment is not shared amongst all my countrymen nor the wider global community.

Gosh the world hopes the US will elect a leader fit for office, with a government able to advocate peace amongst nations.

With great power - comes great responsibility.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kenya
bobbytaruru18 September 2018
The least you could do would have been to Honor the Kenyans who paid the ultimate price, dead and scarred for life Kenyans, by actually shooting the Kenyan scenes in Kenya with Kenyan actors. This is a very offending series to Kenyans and Tanzanians, especially those who went through it first hand. For it to be dramatized by South Africans, it's an abuse. FYI, Kenyan police don't grow beards, you ignorant people. And our national dress is the complete opposite of the portrayal of the majority. And the worst is, you got the accents 1000+% wrong. Employ serious researchers. Shame. And by the way, at 0:49:39 series 1 episode 3, the "dead body" was still breathing.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
compelling history
SnoopyStyle22 November 2018
It's 1998. Martin Schmidt (Peter Sarsgaard), the head of the CIA's Alec Station, maintains a tight hold on intelligence despite directives to share with the FBI. John O'Neill (Jeff Daniels) is his counterpart in the FBI's I-49 unit in New York investigating Al-Qaeda. Ali Soufan (Tahar Rahim) is one of a few fluent Arabic speakers in the FBI who becomes O'Neill's trusted protégé. This follows the competing branches as Al-Qaeda mounts more and more attacks.

There are some eye-opening revelations. I've heard about a few of these issues but it's another thing to see them put together on the screen. There is an obvious slant to the material and some of it is too slanted. Nevertheless, these are compelling characters in a real history thriller. There is a doomed moodiness in the inevitable ending. I find myself tired of the 9/11 rehash at times especially the hijackers' side of the story which added very little in my opinion. It may be necessary but I ended up fast forwarding some of it. Ali's story is compelling. I'm less compelled by John's personal life. Martin is too much of a caricature. This is powerful at times and a needed history lesson.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
BLOOMING CRAZY STUFF
MadamWarden10 July 2020
This is an excellent series with great acting and direction. This is not a Hollywood action series. This is a thoughtful, insightful and elegantly made depiction of the incredible incompetence of the USA intelligence services. A must see if you really want to see the consequence of bureaucracy and petty politics. Unbelievable and shocking.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A bit creaky but pretty riveting
duncan-16020 June 2019
I can't imagine that most of any of this is true but it's interesting viewing. What IS distracting is some of the locations which are pretty ridiculous. I'm pretty sure that's Canada doubling for both downtown Kenya AND Manchester. As a Brit, it's pretty insulting to see that they didn't even try to recreate the UK effectively. The only 'pub' they go in to in LONDON FFS is a heavily-themed Irish pub (oh please!)...I've been in more convincing pubs in Tokyo. The police cars look Canadian and the Mancunian landlady speaks with a US version of a Yorkshire accent (it's a subtle but important difference if you are going to make the effort....she may as well have been cockney). BUT they did have a Boddington's beer mat in a phone box (why...wtf?) to show that it was 'Manchester'. Whilst these issues might be minor, the integrity of any show which treats its audience with this amount of disrespect and stupidity should probably be questioned.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unwatchable Hollywood tropes - Can't stick to the gripping story of the topic.
Rob-O-Cop27 April 2018
This is a story that needs no embellishments, needs no gumshoe detective cliches, no bedroom scenes, no affairs, no fabricated personal dramas, yet that is all that the first 2 episodes of this show has delivered. I don't need to see Jeff Daniels character carrying on with multiple women well out of his league, sweating over women half his age, it adds nothing to the story and worse takes away from it. Bill Camp's fictional liaison with a character who never existed in the Kenyan embassy. Why???, It just pads out an already complicated and hard to follow story with fictitious Hollywood cliche 'drama' that we get from 1000 other shows that don't have this massive real story as their theme. I wouldn't mind it if it had some relevance to the real story, but it's done so badly that it making the show unwatchable. We want to follow the events of the real life story but are bogged down in the good cop bad cop, philandering husband, cheesy hook ups carry on, done so dumbly and aimed at an audience of stupids, that the core story, and our will to follow it is lost. There is a massive story to tell here, but not only can't we look to the Looming tower to tell it, we can't even wade our way through it's 10 badly paced episodes to filter the fact from the fiction.
77 out of 140 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed