User Reviews

Stephen Gaghan's re-imagining of the classic character gifted with the ability to talk to animals brings it back to its storybook origins, where Dolittle is a famed doctor veterinarian in 19th-century Victorian England. Based on the second of Hugh Lofting's Doctor Dolittle books, 'The Voyage of Doctor Dolittle', it follows the doctor on a quest to a mythical island to find a cure for the Queen Victoria (Jessie Buckley), who has been poisoned by the conniving Lord Badgley (Jim Broadbent) and Dolittle's enemy Doctor Mudfly (Michael Sheen).

That quest is also intended as emotional closure for Dolittle, whom we are told in the animated prologue had secluded himself behind the high walls of Dolittle Manor following the death of his wife Lily (Kasia Smutniak) seven years ago. Not only does Dolittle have to come out of hiding, the mission also requires him to retread Lily's fateful voyage, before she was lost in a storm out at sea. It also gets personal for Dolittle in other ways, including having to come face to face with Rassoulim (Antonio Banderas) and the ferocious tiger Barry (Ralph Fiennes).

Not that much of it matters; in the hands of director and co-writer Gaghan, 'Dolittle' is little more than a series of frantic set-pieces under the guise of a swashbuckling adventure. That freneticism is also as a result of a whole menagerie of animals which Dolittle brings along on his voyage - including an insecure gorilla (Rami Malek), a bouncy polar bear (John Cena), a quarrelsome duck (Octavia Spencer), and a wise macaw (Emma Thompson) - that are constantly fighting for attention and screaming over each other in order to be heard.

Each scene is as messy as you can imagine, with little point except to create enough distraction to keep the younger ones among the audience entertained with the non-stop bickering. Worse, these non-human characters seem to be all over the scene at the same time, often either eclipsing Dolittle or making him seem utterly inconsequential. It doesn't help that there is little depth to each one of the non-human characters, even with a whole bunch of Hollywood A-listers assembled to give them voice, especially since they are simply given one single defining trait and nothing more.

Much of the blame unfortunately lies with Gaghan. The Oscar-winning writer of such geopolitical fare as 'Traffic' and 'Syriana' seemed to us an odd choice to direct such a special-effects heavy family movie when he was first attached, and the results prove that he is truly and completely out of his league. Not only are the jokes unfunny, the action is terribly unexciting and uninvolving, and not even the purportedly late salvage attempts by 'TMNT' director Jonathan Liebersman and 'The Lego Movie' writer Chris McKay can turn around what is essentially a misguided movie from the very start.

As much as we like RDJ, there is only so much the charismatic actor can do with such an underwritten role. Though the plotting promises a poignant journey for Dolittle coming to terms with the loss of his beloved wife, that proves to be no more than a convenient device in the scheme of the overall narrative, raised only when expedient to remind us that there is more to the man than his eccentricities. Oh yes, it should come as no surprise that RDJ brings his trademark playful yet confident air to the character, but even that is no match for the sheer commotion that follows him around the entire movie, no thanks to the incessant cacophony of his animal companions.

Much bad press has preceded the release of 'Dolittle', and unfortunately those rumours aren't simply speculation. There is frankly little charm to this feverishly chaotic movie, which seems modelled after the 'Pirates of the Caribbean' series but is hardly able to muster the same idiosyncratic appeal. It is little secret that 'Dolittle' aims to create a new franchise for RDJ after 'Avengers', but we can't see why anyone would want to put themselves through this headache-inducing muddle again. As unlikely as it sounds, we'd take the Eddie Murphy movies over this anytime.

In Victorian England, Dr. John Dolittle (Robert Downey Jr.) can talk to animals. His life is healing animals. His love is his adventurer wife Lily who travels the world saving animals. The Queen gives him an estate for life to do his work. When Lily disappears on one of her adventures, John falls into depression and becomes a shut-in with his animals. Young Tommy Stubbins is forced on a hunting trip and accidentally shots a squirrel. The animal-loving Stubbins takes the squirrel to Dolittle. At the same time, young Lady Rose arrives with the Queen's request for medical help. Dolittle is shocked to discover that the estate for life refers to the Queen's life. He has to save her in order to keep his animal sanctuary. He is frustrated at every turn by rival Dr. Blair Müdfly (Michael Sheen).

I expected a lot worst after the reviews. This is bad and the climatic fart joke does not help. I can certainly see what this premise is attempting to be. This should be a lot more like Pirates of the Caribbean. Downey should be a lot more flamboyant but his character is too flat. I understand his depression and that doesn't help either. The boy and the girl need to be the adventuring leads. Quite frankly, the girl could be Downey's sole companion. The boy's not needed and it's rather convenient to have both young people coming to Dolittle at the same time. As for the animals, there are too many of them and they melt together into one sarcastic blob. They need fewer animals so that their individuality can be elevated. It would be so much better if each animal with individual personalities and skills to solve one particular difficulty each in the adventure. I can see where this is trying to go. I can take a lot of this but the fart joke really hurts.