Mandy (2018) Poster

(I) (2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
1,092 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Really Really not for everyone but...
zahrim_uk20 March 2019
Ok so I first watched this not sure what it was about but I was hopeful of some good old meme quality Nic Cage Rage scenes at the very least. After it finished I sat there thinking WTF and I had to go make a cup of tea and seriously think about some of my life decisions.

Once that was done I came on imdb to find out more about the film and to frankly rant a little. After spending a good half hour reading a lot of very mixed reviews I decided to leave it and watch the film again another day. Which I just have.

It's not my cup of tea. I think the majority of people will hate this film purely because it's not what they are used too, and they just don't get it. Yes ok sympathise with the haters the film is a very simple revenge plot, there's not much dialogue, it's filmed mostly in red and it can drag on in places and many will turn it off before it gets half way.... Which is a shame as this film left me with a similar 'wtf did I just watch' feeling that reminds me of the first time I watched 'Eraserhead.'

'Mandy' is very much an arthouse film with a dose of 80's grindhouse thrown in and if that's the kinda film you like you will love this film. Nic Cage is brilliant in it, and yes he has those rage moments, the violence is swift and brutal, there's even a chainsaw fight. It's surreal, the atmosphere and music blends perfectly with the madness and drug induced hysteria and anger the film is trying to portray in its own arthouse style and I genuinely think this will turn out to be a cult classic.

So yep, not for everyone, but at least try and appreciate it for what it is. 8/10.
239 out of 291 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Metal
truemythmedia13 June 2019
I really enjoyed this film. Honestly, I'm really close to saying that I loved it. This movie is wonderfully inventive, beautifully shot, and totally unlike anything else I've ever seen before. Plus, you get to see Nick Cage fight with chainsaws. What's not to like?
172 out of 214 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good revenge movie
If you think killing John Wick's dog is dangerous wait until you see what happens when you rip Nic Cage's favorite shirt.
68 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"I See The Reaper, Fast Approaching!"...
azathothpwiggins21 September 2020
First off, any movie that opens with a song by King Crimson should get our attention. MANDY is a hallucinatory, revenge / horror film set in the early 1980's. Red Miller (Nicolas Cage) is on a mission of bloody vengeance after a cult full of psychopaths does the unspeakable to the title character (Andrea Riseborough).

Oh, but it's so much more!

Whether you're a rabid Nicolas Cage fan, or you can't stand him, especially, if you can't stand him, you must see him here! Part Charles Bronson, Part Bruce Lee, Part Bruce Campbell, and all Cage! This is the role he was born to play! He forges his own weapon! He takes on demon bikers! He lights a cigarette with a burning, severed head!

Director Panos Cosmatos pulls out every stop, even outdoing his BEYOND THE BLACK RAINBOW! This movie is LSD itself! In case you were wondering, yes, there is a chainsaw! Two, in fact! Dueling chainsaws! My sweet Lord! The finale will alter your reality and change your religion! All this, and cameos from Bill Duke and Richard Brake too! Watch this ASAP!...
96 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
David Lynch meets Hellraiser meets Rob Zombie
shamilton-7079619 November 2018
Just a brief review here summed up in two words...Absolutely Mental.
267 out of 368 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Acid Trip
rarepeperonis1 July 2020
This movie is an absolute trip and people complain about style over substance but that's the whole point of the movie. To give us an insane heavy metal LSD horror trip for 2 hours. It suceeds in every way. Nic Cage is goofy in this movie and it is perfect. Some of his expressions are golden.

I mean if you liked the new suspiria or the neon demon or climax it's kinda in this genre.
36 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertainingly insane
Bertaut31 October 2018
Equal parts psychotropic horror and grindhouse revenge thriller, Mandy is what you might get if David Lynch, Stanley Kubrick, and Andrei Tarkovsky teamed up to remake Death Wish (1974) in the style of a Giallo. The second feature from director and co-writer Panos Cosmatos, after the interesting, but not entirely convincing Beyond the Black Rainbow (2010), Mandy is a psychedelic experience in pretty much every way, and as midnight-y as a midnight B-movie could possibly be. And although it would be impossible to recommend to everyone, there is an undeniable brilliance here. An insane brilliance. But a brilliance none-the-less. Although it could (somewhat legitimately) be accused of too much style and not enough substance, Cosmatos pitch-perfectly mixes an expressionist aesthetic with horror tropes, a generic revenge narrative, and comedy beats. But let's face it, the reason most people will see the film is for Nicolas Cage, and in that sense, Mandy joins the ranks of films such as Vampire's Kiss (1988), The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans (2009), and Mom and Dad (2017) in giving Cage an organic, narratively justified reason to go full-Cage, digging deep into his reservoir of utter insanity. And that's never a bad thing.

Set in "1983 A.D.", the film tells the story of Red Miller (Cage), and his girlfriend, aspiring fantasy artist Mandy Bloom (Andrea Riseborough), who live a simple secluded life in the Shadow Mountains, in a cabin on the banks of Crystal Lake. Hugely supportive of one another, it's hinted that Red may have been an alcoholic and/or drug addict in his youth, whilst Mandy has a significant facial scar, possibly the result of a troubled childhood, which she alludes to from time to time. All is calm in their life until Mandy is spotted by the Children of the New Dawn, a religious cult led by failed folk singer Jeremiah Sand (Linus Roache). Taken with Mandy's beauty, Sand tells his right-hand-man, Brother Swan (Ned Dennehy), that he wants Mandy, saying "you know what to do." Using the "Horn of Abraxas", Swan summons the Black Skulls, a trio of demonic bikers addicted to a highly potent form of LSD, and along with the Skulls, the Children invade Red and Mandy's cabin, tying Red up in barbed wire outside, and leaving him for dead. Meanwhile, two female Children, Mother Marlene (Olwen Fouéré) and Sister Lucy (Line Pillet), drug Mandy with LSD and venom from a giant wasp, before presenting her to Sand. Singing his own song, "Amulet of the Weeping Maze", Sand attempts to seduce Mandy, but things quickly go awry when he proves unable to get an erection. Unbeknownst to the Children, however, Red has survived and set out in pursuit of both the cult and the Skulls.

One of the things that will jump out at you as you watch Mandy is that Cosmatos packs the narrative with an extraordinary amount of cultural references, some oblique, others more obvious. Prior to hearing any dialogue, there is an audio extract of President Ronald Reagan speaking about how the vast majority of Americans are disgusted by porn. Mandy's art is not dissimilar to the work of Roger Dean, whilst the film's animated sections (of which there are several) recall the kind of material found in Heavy Metal. Indeed, the general aesthetic of the film is equal parts Bat Out of Hell and Iron Maiden. The Children of the New Dawn cult is obviously inspired by the Peoples Temple of the Disciples of Christ and the Manson Family, with Sand himself part Jim Jones, part Charles Manson, and part Dan Fogelberg. The home invasion scene bears more than a passing resemblance to similar such scenes in The Last House on the Left (1972) and Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986), whilst the revenge narrative has something of the original Mad Max (1979) about it. The film also recalls Valhalla Rising (2009) in places. Sand's "Amulet of the Weeping Maze" is inspired by the work of The Carpenters (which he admits himself). Red is seen wearing a Mötley Crüe t-shirt, and tells an awesome Erik Estrada/CHiPs (1977) joke. During a discussion about which planet is their favourite, Mandy selects Jupiter, but Red argues for Galactus. The Black Skulls are obviously inspired by the Cenobites from Hellraiser (1987). The Children's A-frame chapel resembles the church in There Will Be Blood (2007). This is as culturally-literate a film as you're likely to see all year, and as much as the narrative exists in a kind of shattered-mirror version of reality, these references do help ground it, even if many of them are purposely anachronistic.

Mandy gets off to a cracking start by using the old Universal logo, complete with scratches and dirt on the celluloid. It follows that up with the most pseudo-John Carpenter 80s music imaginable, composed by Jóhann Jóhannsson, in one of his last compositions prior to his untimely death, with guitar chords played by Stephen O'Malley of Sunn 0))). To give you an idea of the type of music featured throughout the film, there's an early shot moving across the forest scored to King Crimson's "Starless". Indeed, the score is almost another character entirely, and the film simply wouldn't work half as well if the music wasn't as good.

Aside from the music, the most immediately attention-grabbing aspect of the film is the use of colour, with director of photography Benjamin Loeb's compositions bathed in deep purples, reds, indigos, yellows, greens, and oranges, with the occasional blue (primarily associated with Mandy herself). Often the colours are non-diegetic and unexplained (for example the Horn of Abraxas always appears in green light, irrespective of location). The cinematography also employs a plethora of subjective techniques, such as double lens flares, animation, slow-motion fades and dissolves, telephoto shots, what can only be described as psychedelic lighting, and a hell of a lot of dry ice.

Very much a film of two halves, if the first brings us to the gates of hell, the second pushes us in and slams the gates shut behind us. The first half runs up until just prior to the beginning of Red's revenge, whilst the second depicts that revenge. The first half focuses primarily on Mandy, with Red very much a supporting character, whilst the second, obviously, focuses on him. However, it's not just in terms of narrative content in which the two halves differ, they are also aesthetically different, particularly the editing rhythms. The first is languid and dream-like, almost graceful, whilst the second is like something out of Dante Alighieri or William Blake, filtered through H.R. Giger on acid. The two halves are divided by an extraordinary single-shot 45-second scene of Red (wearing only underpants and a t-shirt) pouring vodka all over his wounds, drinking what's left, and screaming. It's a scene of extraordinarily raw emotion that works brilliantly, partly because scenes like it are so rare. You simply don't often see a male protagonist this vulnerable. This is Mandy's "suit up" scene, and here is Cage crying like a starving baby. It's a brave choice by both actor and director, and it works perfectly both as a stand-alone scene and as a transition from the first to the second half of the film. Indeed, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that one could read Mandy, at least in part, as a meditation on the destructive nature of profound grief, and if so, that interpretation begins right here. Yes, there is more than a hint of an archetypal dualistic cosmology underpinning Red's revenge, particularly Zoroastrianism and Manichaeism, but so too is it a deeply personalised quest.

Especially in the second half of the film (and particularly in the last few minutes), Cosmatos strives to place us in Red's head, which has the effect of elevating the carnage beyond that of your standard ultra-violent revenge movie. As Red's mission progresses, and he becomes more and more unhinged, so too does the film become less and less interested in what we would refer to as reality, introducing such aspects as cannibalism, a bow named "The Reaper" and arrows which "cut through bone like a fat kid through cake", a chemist who can smell where the Black Skulls are, a stoned tiger, eels, a cigarette being lit via a flaming body part, choking via knife, (several) decapitations, a chainsaw duel, a church in the forest with secret underground passages, a skull crushing, hallucinations, even a cosmic event.

There are some problems, however. For starters, it's kind of disappointing when you realise that for all its technical prowess and fascinating aesthetic gymnastics, when it comes down to it, Mandy is just a revenge flick, and at just over two hours, it tends to drag a little in places. The screenplay can also be too on the nose at times. For example, early in the film, Mandy tells a story about her father attempting to force her to kill a baby starling that proves tonally prophetic in the way only stories in films ever are. Additionally, the script (by Cosmatos and Aaron Stewart-Ahn) doesn't give Red a huge amount of depth.

Is there an element of the emperor's new clothes about the entire endeavour? Yes, to a certain extent there is. And, yes, most of the best bits are in the trailer (or at least are spoiled by the trailer - the chainsaw duel would have been much funnier if I hadn't known it was coming). And yes, it's all kind of pointless. However, love it or loathe it, there's no denying that it's brilliantly assembled. As an audio-visual experience, it's unlike anything I've seen in a long time, and it's almost certainly destined for cult status.
143 out of 200 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wasted potential, style over substance
xxx-5007418 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
First half of the movie: 6.5/10 Second half - 2/10

Okay, first things first - visually it's not bad, if you ignore the abuse of the color correction in some places, there's some interesting things about camera work and such, but all of it falls flat after the first hour of the movie, because everything else takes a nosedive into the pool of excrement.

All the build-up and suspense in the first hour of the movie is completely gone in the second half, when the "action" comes in.

When members of the cult are first introduced, you can feel that they are a threat. The first appearance of these cenobite-like bikers is good - you don't know anything about them, their identity is completely mystified and they feel like something inhumane, demonic.

Guess what? Nope, they are just a bunch of drug-addicted douchebags, and they are killed by main character in a very lame manner in about 15 minutes of screentime.

Same goes for all other cult members - turns out there's just small bunch of them, and, by some lucky coincidence, they are completely separated from each other, so they can be easily killed by Nicholas Cage in the most lazy and uninspiring ways.

Have i told you that action scenes are bad? Oh boy, they are. There's two ways in which main character kills someone - it's either some quick cheap death made possible by pure luck and stupidity of the victim, or badly choreographed cringe-inducing attempt at making a fight scene.

Here's some example: there's a very long camera shot of the guy polishing his car, there's nobody around and he's completely unaware. Suddenly, it cuts to a looped video of the rotating axe at pitch black background. Next shot just shows the guy silhouette falling with the axe in his head and that's it - it looks like something straight out of Troma movie.

Given that story is non-existent, and it's only there to accompany the visuals, you at least expect the "revenge" part to be satisfying and over the top, especially if you watched the trailer. But unfortunately it turns out to be a boring slog, with an anticlimactic ending and feeling of dissatisfaction.
341 out of 632 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A brilliantly bonkers trippy revenge horror
Tweekums8 April 2019
Red Miller and his girlfriend Mandy Bloom have a peaceful life in America's Pacific Northwest until a strange cult arrives in the area. Mandy catches the eye of the cults Mansonesque leader, Jeremiah, and he has her and Red kidnapped by the Black Skulls; a biker gang on acid with a penchant for human blood! Needless to say bad things happen. Red is left by their tormentors and the next day he sets off on his personal mission of revenge. This will involve a crossbow, battle axe and a chainsaw fight before he ultimately faces Jeremiah again.

This is a distinctly strange film but very effective. Once the bad things start to happen the violence is intense and quite disturbing. As Red sought his revenge many things that happened I couldn't help thinking of the quote from Friedrich Nietzsche 'He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster'... Red certainly does some monstrous things. There is something very surreal about what is happening; almost as if it were meant to be viewed as a nightmare or a bad hallucination rather than real events. Nicolas Cage is on top form as Red; his performance is more than a little crazed but that is what the role demanded. Andrea Riseborough and Linus Roache also impress as Mandy and Jeremiah. This clearly won't be for everybody but I'd recommend it to horror fans who enjoy the weird as well as the gory.
39 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Buckle up for a dark nightmare
vyncynt30 December 2022
Parents take note! This is not your typical Nicolas Cage film. Although it starts off slowly with some character development, it is quickly thrust into a deep, dark, hallucinogenic, and very disturbing vehicle into raging madness and revenge. This film is not for the faint of heart!

Some of the characters are a bit difficult to understand, so it helps to turn subtitles on.

There is heavy use of color throughout which is reminiscent of many horror and slasher films from the 1970s and 1980s. Strobing and hallucinogenic effects are present periodically.

Despite the seriousness of the latter half of the film, small elements of campy humor are present where they are least expected.

This film is definitely over the top, but is one of those films which must be watched to the end to see what happens next.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Style over substance
dynamiteheaddy-4338719 December 2018
Take away the camera filters and lens flares and you are left with an unoriginal revenge film for which there are many better, there's far too many unnecessary slow-motion shots which stretch the thin plot out unbearably to over 2 hours. Critics seem to be lapping it up for its style but I need more then that.
144 out of 261 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A film like no other
masonsaul17 December 2018
Mandy is a visually gorgeous film that's like no other film. Panos Cosmatos' direction is incredible and the action sequences are great. Nicolas Cage gives an incredibly committed performance that's both emotional and unhinged when required. Andrea Riseborough and Linus Roache both give great supporting performances. The music by Johann Johannsson is fantastic.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Revenge, blood, synthetic rock, and neon lights. Oh and of course Nic Cage.
Oh_Capital27 January 2022
If you watched the trailer then you have essentially seen the movie. It's a basic revenge premise that I thought would be wrapped up in complexities, given this is an art-house film. Not the case. The most important thing the director seems to care about is lighting, not telling a story.

Mandy takes it's time building up to the crux of the film. Once it gets there the last hour moves pretty quick. Nic Cage is a 'chaotic good' character out to extinguish the evil that wronged him. He does shine in a few scenes, and he makes you laugh in some others. The cult serves its purpose but there is nothing unique about them. The demon biker gang was very underwhelming. It was a big part of my interest in the film and they do nothing.

Overall there is not much nuance here. There is some blood splatter, light trickery, and a lot of fade to black transitions. It's a good time but the only memorable thing is the music.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the worst movies I have ever seen
DanteRiggs27 October 2020
It's boring, long, confusing and weird just for the sake of it. The first half is very slow and repetitive. While watching it, I was actually getting sleepy. It's not scary, it's not creepy, it's not even interesting. It's just plain boring. The plot is basically "The Crow", just done far worse. Far far worse.
24 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
GORE! DRUGS! REVENGE!!
tadarahul18 October 2022
Mandy is an sweet cupcake to all the gore lovers out there.

Its a revenge plot with lots and lots of acid trips and rock and roll bgm.

Bad guys are played as hippies with god complex.

A normal wood cutter turns into a blood hungry monster when his wife is kidnapped by the bad guys.

Linus Roache plays the main bad guy and his acting in that role is top notch!

About the hero NICOLAS CAGE his performance is excellent. The way he transforms from a normal guy to a bad-- bad guy is cool. He even has a cool axe like weapon.

Acid trips with trippy visuals,animation, tigers,demon like creatures,biker gangs and more drugs and what not awesome things are in the movie.

They even have a house in the lone forest with a fantastic view.

Finally A must watch for everyone who can handle graphic content.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Something unique
mts-564-42976216 September 2018
This really is not for everyone and that is just fine. Also story wasnt anything new or special, just typical revenge story. Really liked how this looked, sounded and felt. Visuals and colours are just outstanding and that was something that hooked me from the start, really trippy stuff in a good way. Music and sounds were pushing this dark overall sinister feel and worked perfectly. And also Nick have us great performance near insanity.
369 out of 551 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A hypnotic fever dream of nightmarish proportions propelled by a reliably crazy performance from Nicolas Cage
MrDHWong25 October 2018
Mandy is an action horror film co-written and directed by Panos Cosmatos. Starring Nicolas Cage and Andrea Riseborough, it is a hypnotic fever dream of nightmarish proportions propelled by a reliably crazy performance from Cage.

In 1983, reclusive couple Red (Nicolas Cage) and Mandy (Andrea Riseborough) live in seclusion in the Shadow Mountains of California. One day, Mandy inadvertently encounters the Children of the New Dawn, a deranged cult of hippies who take a liking to Mandy and later arrange for her to be kidnapped, sending Red into an unrelenting and sadistic rage.

Brutal, shocking, and beautifully shot, Mandy unashamedly thrives on its unique premise from beginning to end. The film appears to have been heavily influenced by the work of David Lynch, with its surreal imagery and inventive cinematography, further emphasising the overall dream-like experience. Nicolas Cage is his usual over-the-top self and he demonstrates this several times during the film's second half. This is certainly not for everyone, but fans of surreal artsy films, graphic violence, and Nicolas Cage will find plenty to enjoy.

I rate it 7/10
63 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nic Cage carries this as Red, revenge for his wife Mandy.
TxMike4 May 2023
There are those who easily forgive transgressions by misguided people and seek to have them treated and return to society as productive people. For those, this is NOT the type of movie.

Perhaps the most appropriate review title here is "Entertainingly Insane." The best clue regarding this movie is what the director says, "The actual story is not so important, what matters is how you shoot it and edit it." In other words, how it looks and feels is most important, and that comes at you full force in this movie.

I would not normally seek out this type of movie but recently I read that Nic Cage says during a period when he was in debt by several $Millions he took lots of roles and made some questionable movies because he needed to earn money.

This probably isn't one of those, I saw a recent interview on a late night show and when asked to name his five favorite movies he has made, "Mandy" was on that short list.

Set in the Pacific Northwest, it was filmed mostly in Belgium where they found some very interesting locations, which adds to the visual design. The movie has lots of red in it, particularly red lights at night, and lots of gore and blood. At its core it is a revenge movie, to destroy a misled religious cult with a fanatic as its leader.

At home on DVD from my public library.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
DO NOT WASTE TIME on this garbage
steffenb2 December 2018
You have to be on a bad acid trip in order to get anything good out of this crappy low budget movie. How can anyone give it a high rating? After suffering through 2 hours totally waste of time, I understand why no one of those who gives it a high rating are able to come up with an actual review of it. It's the worst and most boring movie I have seen the last 10 years. DISSAPOINTING!
71 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
THERE'S A CHAINSAW FIGHT AND A NIGHTBEAST REFERENCE, WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED TO KNOW?
aftermoviediner13 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Mandy is the latest indie darling/art-house horror/Nic Cage film that is setting the internet ablaze and movie critics reaching for the hyperbolic adjectives. It's almost the perfect film for the current generation of movie goers: it's arty enough for the critics, hip enough for the nonchalant, above-everything crowd, gory and violent enough for the hardcore genre fans and it stars Nic Cage so even the "oh my god he's just so crazy", "so-bad-it's-good" meme makers are happy.

Mandy tells the story of loving couple Red Miller and Mandy Bloom. Living in the Pacific north west in 1983, Red (Cage) works as a forestry worker while Mandy (Riseborough) is an artist and works in a local shop. Their idyllic, private and quiet life is soon torn asunder, in a vile and brutal way, by a drugged up, hippy, religious cult, accompanied by three insane bikers. Cage then goes all mental and revengy on them, having borrowed a cross bow from a random cameoing Bill Duke and forging his own, both futuristic and ancient, scythe/sword thing.

From there it gets violent, bloody and darkly comic and features a recurring tiger motif, genre homages a plenty and a legitimately groovy chainsaw fight.

So let's get into it then. I like Nicolas Cage as an actor. Not in an ironic way, not in an aloof way but just in a genuine way. Does he occasionally over act and does he ever give strange line readings? Yes - see almost any decent actor out there. Actors can become personalities, parodies of themselves and while that might improve their brand, it tarnishes their talent. Will you be a Christopher Walken and acknowledge it but just continue doing what you've always done or will you be a Jeff Goldblum and go full maximum Goldblum, letting it define you? Well I think Cage is sticking on he Walken side of that equation.

He does too many movies and the roles are too diverse for you to ever pigeonhole the Cage method. Contrary to popular belief he is not an Eric Roberts, taking any single film idea offered to him. When you look through his filmography and actually watch a few of the films (as opposed to just ironically watching The Wicker Man remake stoned and laughing or sharing memes of his hair in Bangkok Dangerous) you'll find an actor in the enviable position of working in whatever genre likes, telling weird and wonderful stories and having tremendous fun into the bargain. He's not beholden to Hollywood narrow-mindedness or to fan pressure to just keep doing one type of thing. Not many people in the business can claim that. When it comes to Mandy, also consider these two bits of information: Cage was offered the role of the manic, charismatic and egotistical preacher Jeremiah Sand (Linus Roache). This is the obvious Cage role, in a movie with barely any dialogue, Jeremiah has all the pontificating, grandstanding and mood-swinging we've seen Cage do previously. Cage instead pushed to get the role of Red Miller, a role that director Panos Cosmatos intended for a much younger actor. Now, Red Miller has his moments and there is definitely a drizzling of unhinged Cage in the film but the role is also defined by its silence and by its screams, not its dialogue or its mania.

I have heard reviews single out a bathroom sequence, where he drinks vodka while in unimaginable pain, as Cage doing his "thing". I didn't find the sequence "classic weird Cage", I actually found it understandable, moving and disturbing.

The film really hinges on us following his journey both emotionally and physically. Like a silent film, Mandy relies on its visuals and action to tell its, relatively, limited story and allows for audience interpretation and extrapolation. If Nic Cage's performance doesn't work, if you're not gripped by his plight and pushed forward by his determination for retribution then none of it really works.

The second bit of information is that during an interview with filmmaker Kevin Smith, Nic Cage admitted not only to watching Panos Cosmatos' previous film Beyond the Black Rainbow but to watching Kevin Smith's "walrus movie" Tusk. No one mentions the "walrus movie" in an interview unless they've actually seen it. Smith was talking about Valley Girl, if Cage wanted to simply repay the compliment he'd say Chasing Amy, Clerks or something he might have watched at a film festival once. No, Cage dropped Tusk, that tells me a lot about Nicolas Cage.

Andrea Riseborough as Mandy says only a few things in the movie and, spoilers (not-really), the plot involves her exiting the film early on. What we can ascertain, however, is that she is peaceful, detached, likes art, fantasy novels, 80s metal, sci-fi films (more on that later) and living out in the middle of nowhere. An unexplained scar on her face and her quiet removal from society indicates maybe some past trauma but that is never developed upon.

More than anyone else in the film, her character's apparent passions and taste define the influences on the film. The strong, deep, vivid colour palette of the cinematography, the cinematic references, the metal album cover references, the designs of the bikers and even a few animated sequences all seem to flow from what we see of Mandy Bloom during act one of the film.

The other cast member that definitely deserves a mention is Linus Roach as Jeremiah Sands. While no clear philosophy or message comes through his babbling preacher and variety of messed up followers - a hodge podge of crazies, true believers and lost and damaged souls - Sands is a frustrated musician, ego maniacal lunatic, mood swinging abuser and deluded psychopath. On the surface he's just an amalgam of any other clichéd cult leader but, as previously stated, Mandy is short on exposition but shows you just enough of any character that you can extrapolate most of what is trying to be portrayed. The true genius moment of his character is when he puts on his record, hoping that his drippy, psychedelic, pastiche folk stylings will impress Riseborough's Mandy. For those in the know about music and cult leader cliches it is a belly laugh moment.

Panos Cosmatos definitely wrote and made this film for people who have seen films like this before but who, probably, haven't seen one presented like this before. In other words he trusts a savvy audience to fill in some of the blanks. I think the artistic sheen on the movie, and clearly very deft cinematic skill with which it's constructed may push some to believe the film is deep in someway but, don't be fooled, this film is an exploitation film pure and simple. Just because they skimped on character and plot explanations, shot it with a bunch of lights and filters, scored it with tension building rumbles and high, unnerving synth tones and left wide gaps for the audience to fill in doesn't mean there's some hidden message or explanation there. It just means Panos Cosmatos knows how to construct a good genre film. He knows that in most horror, action and/or exploitation films you point the audience at a bad guy, put the good guy through hell and with that justify the carnage filled journey of our anti-hero for the remaining 70 minutes.

I'm sure there are reasons for some of the tiger imagery and some of the vaguries in the film but its driving force is exploitation, cool moments, grusome kills, mad weaponry, Argento style lighting, movie references all over the shop and hip t-shirts.

An easy criticism would be to say it is style over substance and it is, it's glorious, arresting, eerie, difficult, dark, disturbing, mad, violent, deeply coloured and surreal style over substance.

There was one scene, however, that sold the whole film to me and made me love it unequivocally - what are you talking about Jon? The chainsaw fight? are you talking about the chainsaw fight because that scene is off the chain! - No, I am not talking about the epic chainsaw battle, although that scene is, indeed, off the chain. I am talking about a sequence that'll probably mean very little to a lot of people but allow me to explain why the Nightbeast scene in Mandy is EVERYTHING.

During the opening 15 minutes of the movie as we meet Mandy and Red, see their life together, there is a sequence where the two of them watch a sci-fi B Movie together. They eat TV dinners, at separate tables and do not take their eyes off the TV screen. A TV Screen which is showing Don Dohler's Nightbeast.

Don Dohler is the Baltimore native filmmaker who made alien invasion movies, mad horror/action films, straight-to-video slashers and naughty vampire films in the quiet suburbs, at the end of a nondescript cul-de-sac, in Maryland.

Unfortunately, in this age of snarky 'so-bad-it's-good' film fandom, some of Don's films have been either derisively enjoyed or simply dismissed by some people. This is a crushing shame because when you look passed their limited budgets and occasional amateur moments, you find a passionate, creative, inventive, weird, gonzo and original series of homemade masterpieces from a person who followed his dream. He should be an inspiration to the backyard John Carpenters and basement Hitchcocks of today - in fact in his home town of Baltimore he has been and indie filmmaking thrives there.

This is why the scene in Mandy where Nic Cage and Andrea Riseborough sit so seriously and intently glued to Nightbeast is the best scene in the film. They don't laugh, they don't mock it, they are genuinely into it and this tells us b-movie fans all we need to know about their relationship. I am the first to admit that low budget filmmaking is not for everyone but when you find that person who will, un-cynically, watch a Don Dohler film (or similar) with you, then you have found true love and a soulmate. When I saw that scene, I understood the film. In lesser hands the couple would've watched The Room and laughed at it in an ugly, derisive way and I would've hated it....
402 out of 602 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Should have been a short film
ronsonmoses14 September 2018
There's some good stuff here, but there's a lot that's complete trash. Shots are needlessly long and there's literally twenty completely unnecessary scenes. It took over an hour to progress the story to any level of interest. It's a shame because there's such potential here.
233 out of 414 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Good Artist May Take Drugs, but Taking Drugs Doesn't Automatically Make You A Good Filmmaker
gabriel-8562415 September 2018
This film is just..awful. There's actually a mention about a bad batch of LSD, which obviously the whole crew must have taken...Bad photography, full of kitsch colour filters, to try to render the effects of (bad) drugs, awful dialogs which anyone in their right mind would laugh at, 2 hours of a really boring bad trip... Want something visually stunning, without having to take drugs? Blueberry, by Jan Kounen. Want something a bit more mind-challenging? Altered States, by Ken Russel Want something a bit more fun and gore? Shrooms, by Paddy Breathnach, or Crank, by Mark Neveldine. The point is: this film fails completely, as a thriller, horror, or crime movie. Even back in the 80's, there were already much better films around. The producers must have taken too much bad coke to believe in this project. And speaking of drugs, since the 90's at least, there's MDMA and other empathogens: obviously, this crew missed out on that...Never at one moment during the film do you feel the slightest kind of empathy or sympathy whatsoever for any of the characters...So is it just supposed to be some kind of revenge movie? Even there, you'll find plenty of better movies than this one... So, my advice: smoke a good joint, or not, but watch something else! There's really nothing new here despite the hype...!
318 out of 674 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Color me --- Dead
kosmasp29 January 2019
Nicolas Cage is very well known for going all out. There are memes out there depicting this. And you would be excused for thinking he is like that in real life. But if you watch his interviews you realize he is different. Soft spoken and so different from what he portrays. Seems like he gets it out of his system, when he plays those characters.

But back to the movie, that will split people and their perception of it (someone wrote a review saying that you'll either love it or hate - half the people agree and ... well you get the point). The coloring is amazing, the soundtrack is amazing too. And the movie is ultra violent and quite vivid when it comes to the depiction of it. Not for the squeamish then ... And quite crazy overall
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Let's all hear it for the Cheddar Goblin.
Hey_Sweden4 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Opening with a song by King Crimson, filmmaker Panos Cosmatos' surreal, insane horror film "Mandy" is another of those films that will only appeal to certain tastes. It tells of a happy couple, Red and Mandy (Nicolas Cage and Andrea Riseborough), whose peaceful existence is shattered by an evil hippie cult. Led by the demonic Jeremiah Sand (Linus Roache), they do their great damage and leave; Red manages to get free and takes after them, determined to mete out BRUTAL vengeance.

"Mandy" is incredibly stylized right from the start, with so many elements taking on nightmarish tones - visuals as well as performances. Watching this, you feel like you've descended into a level of Hell. This is a potent journey marked by tragedy, gore, action, and some humorous touches, not to mention the striking score by the late Johann Johannsson and the lighting schemes by cinematographer Benjamin Loeb. Although very slow at times, it revs up big time for the second half and Reds' enraged spree of vengeance.

Cage does go entertainingly over the top at times - in the Nicolas Cage tradition - and creates the kind of badass hero who forges his own weapon and has a chainsaw duel with one of the baddies. Riseborough is quite appealing in her time on screen, while Roache creates such a loathsome antagonist that you REALLY anticipate his demise. His flock are populated by other memorable creeps who get under the skin. There are also vivid but much too brief cameos for Bill Duke and Richard Brake.

While I can see some viewers NOT caring for this picture - like, at ALL - I had a fairly good time with this vengeance saga. It goes off the rails in a true eye-popping way.

Seven out of 10.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad
sonybacker-2149315 September 2018
I was really waiting for this movie and thought it would be Cage's return but boy I was wrong. 2 hours of absolutely nothing in red colour. Please save your money and do not believe good reviews. Avoid at all costs.
372 out of 802 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed