Reviews

59 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Seeing this with proper subtitles makes quite a difference
7 January 2023
Polly Shang-kuan goes to Hell in this fanciful follow-up to Swordsman of All Swordsmen. Polly again portrays Fei Yen-tzu (aka Flying Swallow), and Tien Peng again portrays the heroic Tsai, while David Wei Tang takes over the "Black Dragon" role previously played by Nan Chiang. Together with several others (and a full 7 years before Gordon Liu Chia-hui would descend into the famed 36 Chambers) this trio descends into the treacherous 10 Chambers of Hell in an effort to seek revenge on Lord Chin, the reigning "Yanlou Wang" ruler of Hell (go ahead, take a minute to look that up and while you're at it, look up the various demons and judges listed in the next paragraph too).

Why is this revenge being sought? Because Lord Chin had Polly's blind father and Tien Peng's sword-coveting "Misty Light Master" murdered by his underworldly minions, namely - the Left & Right (Red & Green) Death-amulet-throwing Judges, the Ox Head Demon, the Black & White Wuchangs, the Murdering Wonder Child and the Soul-Hunter Yaksha. Oh, and also the less spectacular Huashan Dragon, Tiger and Phoenix.

Thankfully, while Polly, Tien Peng and David Wei Tang's gang is not quite as colorful, they do have a band of beggars, a Just Cause, and a surprise or two to bring to their battle.

In short, there may be way too many characters, but there's also non-stop action and twisted spectacle. How are our heroes able to literally walk to Hell and Back? You got me! How bad ass is Lord Chin? He bathes in boiling oil when not pulling his servants into his bath with him in order to watch them char to a crisp. Has he any kindness? Well sure, he does seem to have a thing for his daughter (the striking Han Hsiang-chin). Perhaps too much of a thing, however.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Much more than expected
12 August 2022
Prior to watching this impressively multi-faceted film, I'll confess to thinking little more about Cosplay than whether or not I found someone sexually alluring. And while there's no shortage of exposed flesh in this doc, I've come away with a much fuller understanding of the many very different personal and psychological reasons that might lead a person to invest so much of their time and resources in this community of wonderfully creative dress-up.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
HE GETS WOOD. SHE COMES UNRAVELLED.
8 February 2022
That really ought to be the tagline for this wonderfully silly film. Sadly, the line comes not from me but from a friend that I watched this film with.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dead Burger (2017)
1/10
promises, promises...
5 October 2021
Happy to see this film was completed, and shocked to see my name in credits as a Backer. Not because I wasn't a Backer... I was... but because I was supposed to have received a copy of the film, a t-shirt and some lesser perks, but since those never came (despite my contacting them twice and both times being assured that they were on the way), I assumed the Bcker credit never happened either.

Oh well, that's show business!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Many monks self-immolate as their temple crumbles and burns.
7 June 2021
Storywise, THE BLAZING TEMPLE works as a direct follow-up to RETURN OF THE 18 BRONZEMEN, except that the actors who appear in both are not necessarily in the same roles. For instance, in RETURN Carter Wong played an Emperor who went undercover to train at Shaolin, while in BLAZING, he plays Siu, one of a small group of exemplary Shaolin students (YI Yuan takes over the role of the Shaolin-trained Emperor).

More of an action and swordfighting film, than a boxing film (until the final showdown), the said action in BLAZING is both impressive and nearly non-stop. The center piece (using miniatures) is the Qing attack on, and the burning of, the Shaolin Temple. This rather sobering section includes shots of several monks self-immolating as the temple crumbles and burns around them.

BLAZING is also more of an ensemble piece than a showcase for any individual actor. In addition to Carter, CHANG Yi and WEI Tzu-tung have featured roles as two of his fellow exemplary students.

As for notable women, CHIA Ling (aka Judy Lee) bookends the film, serving up a welcome display of kicks, punches, leaps and sword-swingin'. Additionally, there's the wonderful Grace Chen Shu-fang as the Emperor's feisty #1 concubine.

Finally, I should note that I watched this film via the subtitled Mei-Ah dvd and I heartily recommend this version. Should a dubbed version exist, it might not be nearly as satisfying.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tie san jiao (1972)
7/10
Beware the "Iron Triangle" of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean martial arts
6 June 2021
A fairly standard revenge plot is augmented with interesting characters, solid kung fu and a Riz Ortolani soundtrack shamelessly lifted from Day of Anger.

The titular "Triangular Duel" (more properly referred to as the "Iron Triangle" in the subtitled Mei-Ah dvd version) is a "strategy" pitting three men against one. One of these three men - from Japan - punches with fists as hard as iron, another - from Korea - kicks with feet as hard as iron, and the third - from China - has a body that can withstand any beating thanks to skin as hard as iron. And, of course, the only man who has a chance of defeating them has vowed not to fight for a full year, and he's intent on keeping that vow, even after the Master to whom he made it, has moved on to that pile of breakable kung-fu bricks in the sky.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Shaolin has a new hero. And he's a Drunken Ghostface Killer!
31 May 2021
I don't recall when I first saw this, but I must have watched an English subtitled version, as I gave it 9 stars and the dubbed version I just watched on a Ground Zero DVD doesn't quite live up to that level of praise. In part, this is due to some goofy English voicing, but there also appears to be a bit of dumbing down of what I remember to be the plot. That said, the film also suffers from excessive undercranking... and I'm not talking just about the fights, given that it's fairly standard to undercrank those in order to speed up the action. No, I'm talking about EVERYTHING being undercracked. While this is not quite as obvious as it is with a lot of old silent comedies, it's still fairly obvious. Even if one were not to notice the actors sometimes walking at an unusual clip, it's hard not to recognize the voice actors being forced to talk a mile-a-minute in an attempt to fit all of the dialogue in. To this end, I should note that the official running time is listed as 90 minutes, but the Ground Zero version only runs 85 minutes.

All that aside, this is a fun film, suggesting that the real reason the Qing authorities took a disliking to the Shaolin monks was that they were harboring a young Ming Princess... a seeming uncredited (at least in this dubbed version) LIAO Li-chun.

CHEN Chien-chang, aka CHEN Kin-cheung (and credited elsewhere as LUNG Siu-Fei) starts as the official escort who helps the Ming Princess escape to Shaolin Temple in an effort to avoid capture by Qing soldiers. Once inside the Temple, the escort trains to become a fighting monk, receiving some of his training from the Temple's top fighter, a peculiar Abbot with a taste for wine (Mark LONG; aka LUNG Kuan-wu; aka GHOSTFACE KILLER). Though this Drunken Master is a former associate of a Qing General (CHANG Shan; aka CHARNG Shan; aka CHEN Shan), and though this General will stop at nothing to extract the princess from Shaolin, the drunken abbot sides with the Princess against his friend in a dramatic scene involving multiple toasts to the end of their alliance.

As a Joseph Kuo flick, it should go without saying that the film presents some excellent martial arts. Interestingly, these demonstrations come - not only from the three male leads - but also from an unheralded actress named LING Chien (aka LING Sen). Playing a goat herder oddly named Cowgirl, it would be nice if this actress were to one day be given her due (OK, I'll admit it... I have a bit of a crush).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Many reviewers have understandably missed that most of this film is told in flashback.
29 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I watched the English dubbed version released on Mei Ah dvd, and it leaves much to be desired. For starters, most reviewers appear to have missed that a great deal of the film is told in flashback... and this is not at all the fault of the viewer. Incredibly, the blurb on the dvd case also gets it wrong. Plus, I only figured it out after puzzling over several things that didn't make sense, and then watching portions of the film over again. Once you know, however... you know.

What we actually have here is a wraparound story in which Carter Wong plays a Prince who has had the deceased Emperor's Will altered in order to allow him to steal the throne from the rightful heir (presumably, his brother). Worse, he orders the other Prince to be tossed into a dungeon on trumped up charges to await sentencing. Unfortunately, the fate of the brother is left hanging, as he is never mentioned again.

Carter receives intelligence indicating that the monks at Shaolin are planning a revolt. He is counseled to send troops, but says that he will wait until the next day to make his decision.

THIS IS WHERE THE FLASHBACK BEGINS... it is signaled by a screen wipe and a glimpse of a bronze statue that we will see again in the next scene.

While strolling through the village, Carter encounters a monk selling small bronze statues of Shaolin fighters. He inquires about them and learns that students who graduate from Shaolin have a dragon tattoo on one of their arms. He buys one of these statues and thinks to himself: "Hmmmm... I should go to Shaolin to train there."

Carter goes to a cafe and witnesses a cocky and cute (though disguised as a man) Polly Shang-kuan cleverly kicking the crap out of several men. Carter decides he'll have a go at Polly too. The monk from before breaks it up.

Carter continues strolling and helps a pretty girl out of a jam. Smitten, he goes to visit her later, but she is with another man (Tien Peng, who starred with Carter in 18 BRONZEMEN), and this man appears to be good at kung fu. Carter challenges the man to a fight and loses to him, but not before noticing that he has a dragon tattoo on his arm. This, of course, reinforces his interest in studying at Shaolin.

Pretending to be a commoner, Carter goes to the Temple to become a student, but they won't even allow him inside the gate. Eventually, they agree to let him in, but won't allow him to become a student until he proves himself worthy. To do this, he is made to carry water in small buckets, medium buckets, large buckets, and then larger and larger and larger buckets. Also, large bundles of sticks. None of this seems to make any impression, but then he is witnessed eating 19 steamed buns (one more than the number of Bronzemen... coincidence?), and suddenly... he is told that he has been deemed ready.

Where other monks train for 10 years of more before asking to be allowed to challenge the 18 levels of Bronzemen tests, Carter believes he's ready almost immediately. He tries and fails over and over again. Among his challenges are Single Finger Fu, Coin Toss Fu and - in the end - Completus Interuptus Fu! FU THAT, I say!

WE THEN FLASH FORWARD.

Carter is Emperor and his 2nd day on the job begins with Polly Shang-kuan (this time identifying as a woman) trying to kill him in order to get revenge for the murder of her father, a General that we have not seen nor heard anything about. This is probably a reference to a historical occurrence, though it could also be a case of the dubbing simply being incorrect in ID'ing the murdered man as a General (Carter did murder someone in one of the opening scenes, but that person did not appear to be a General).

Carter next receives updated intelligence regarding Shaolin. The monks there have been ordered to attack! Carter asks his court for opinions, learns of a new weapon that can destroy the monks, and orders many of these weapons to be made.

One might expect there to then be a final act in which his forces attack Shaolin, but nope... the movie very abruptly ends there as if it's part one of a two parter. That's unfortunate, had there been more of an ending, and had the flashback been clear, I'd have enjoyed this far more than I did. As is, I'd say it's more fun than 18 BRONZEMEN, but not nearly as fun as one of its two follow-ups, THE EIGHT MASTERS (I've yet to see the BLAZING TEMPLE, the film that came between RETURN and EIGHT. I've read enough about it, however, to know that - as with the other three films - there are no reoccurring characters... just reoccurring cast members).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Harvesters (2001 Video)
4/10
This is BLOOD MASSACRE with a lower budget and less imagination...
19 January 2021
More attractive women and boobs though, so I guess that's something. But seriously, don't waste your time with this until after you've watched Dohler's rather incredible Blood Massacre.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A rather brilliant introduction to the sonic world of Fred Frith
28 May 2019
Every scene serves to illustrate Frith's primary conceit... borrowed from John Cage... that music is all around us at all times if one is open to hearing it. For instance, it's in the sound of power tools, garbage trucks, and the raking of the stones in a Japanese rock garden. Frith sometimes incorporates these sounds directly into his work, but more often, he simply does his best to recreates them on his guitar, violin and other instruments.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interrabang (1969)
3/10
Full of twists and turns? Hardly!
15 March 2018
Nothing happens in this until the final 10 minutes. And there's nothing at all "giallo" about it. My recommendation? Watch the 1st 10 minutes until you've had enough of sailing. Skip ahead and watch another random 10 minutes until you've had you eyeful of the lovely ladies. Then watch the last 10 minutes for the twists and turns.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lady Kung Fu (1972)
8/10
Blink and you'll miss Jackie Chan and Yuen Biao, but Lam Ching-Ying is featured nicely
18 August 2017
Jackie can be seen briefly in at least two scenes. I first noticed him near the end of the film in the scene where Angela visits the Japanese school and is prevented from leaving. Jackie, dressed in black, stands in the doorway and gets flipped to the floor by Angela. In another scene, he's also standing on the left side of a doorway, but he's wearing white.

I THINK I also saw Yuen Biao (in white) a couple of times, but unfortunately, I can't tell you where to look for him.

What surprised me was how prominently featured Lam Ching-Ying is in this movie. He's all over the fight scene that takes place in the street market, ultimately taking punches from Sammo Hung, who probably has more screen time than anyone else in the film.. certainly screen time spent fighting.

Finally, I was surprised to discover that the attractive young woman who gets ogled and nearly groped near the start is none other than Nancy Sit!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Just hangin' out with old friends
18 August 2017
This is not so much a documentary as an invitation to a party with Bobby Rush as a casual guide. There's no discernible structure to the film, and the various players come and go - some not properly introduced until the final reel -but it is nonetheless a tremendous joy simply to be allowed to spend a little time with each and every person. Though many in this group are 80 years old and older, all but one appear to still have both their talent and their wit.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Matangtubig (2015)
9/10
Naw! It's probably about the man in the moon
6 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that I think this film is about our refusal to accept the potential for reprehensible violence in those close to us. Or even in nature. The bad element is always fashioned an outsider. When something truly awful happens, it's THEM not US. Something like THAT can simply NOT HAPPEN HERE. And our media comically contribute to this ridiculously false narrative with distancing, trivialization and spin... all as our beloved civic leaders busily position and protect themselves. Or maybe it's about the man in the moon. Your choice.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sarrainodu (2016)
7/10
Delightfully insane style over substance
22 April 2016
The English subtitling for this Tollywood effort is rough, and much of the humor doesn't fully translate, but director Boyapati Srinu and "Stylish Star" Allu Arjun (aka "Bunny") succeed in transcending the language barrier with their waaaay over-the-top action scenes, and some infectiously fun - hip-hop influenced - dance sequences. Music is by SS Thaman, with choreography by Bollywood's Bosco, and it impresses and/or inspires giggles in equal measure.

The first half of this fully ridiculous ride is the strongest by far, highlighted by a nasty fight scene on skates at a roller park, and ultimately, with a show stopping massacre at the ill-fated marriage ceremony that concludes Act 1. Sadly, topping this visual mayhem would be next to impossible, which leaves the 2nd Act as a bit of let down.

Love interest for our impossibly unstoppable fighting superhero is provided - during most of the 1st Act - by Catherine Tresa, and - in the 2nd - by the very alluring and talented Rakul Preet Singh, easily the best of all of the actors in this film (and a fella's best reason for sticking around past intermission).
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Poorly made, but emotionally effective in the end.
6 August 2015
OM JAI JAGADISH is actor Anupam Kher's directorial debut, and I enjoyed it, but it is not a great film by any measure. The editor toys with bafflingly haphazard jump cuts that are so artless and - frequently - minute, as to have virtually no effect at all. It's as if he were ordered to cut several minutes from the film, and having not a single clue how to do so, decided to randomly remove two frames here... four frames there... without any hint of reason. Similarly, the scriptwriter expects the audience to make leaps that Evel Kneivel wouldn't risk. And finally, the music, lyrics, and choreography are pleasing, but redundant. Each number briefly entertains (the first number not occurring until after the 30 minute mark), but is instantly forgotten as soon as it's over. Yet, despite the technical and artistic incompetence's, this film does somehow manage to move one before the final curtain falls.

Anil Kapoor, Fardeen Kahn, and Abhishek Bachchan play three brothers: Om, Jai, and Jagadish, respectively. Though not fully explained in the English subtitles, I gather that the names, spoken in order, replicate the beginning of a traditional Hindi prayer for family unity. In fact, the films full title is "Om Jai Jagadish: A Prayer For Togetherness".

Om is the eldest brother, an honest, responsible man who guards the family honor, while looking after his younger moral and financial well being, as best as he can afford. To Jagadish's disappointment, however, Om's financial ability appears to have been largely exhausted on sending Jai to American for a college education. This causes Jagadish's future (as a software designer) to have to sit on a back burner until Jai finishes his education and returns to India. Om's expectation is that Jai will agree to commit to a long term corporate position in India, which will earn him a large monetary advance (and apparent Indian custom), with which Om can pay back the loan he took out to finance Jai's education.

But the Americanized Jai has other ideas. He intends to pay his brother back, but he sees his options as brighter and more open in America, where committing to a long-term position could be career suicide. As such, he will not immediately be able to provide his brother with the lump sum that is needed to pay off the loan. Unbeknownst to Jai, however, this decision of his may cost Om the family home! Jagadish, in the meantime - who also does not know about the threat to the family home - spends his time hacking into the school computer in order to assist his friends with their grades and attendance records. Naturally, this lands him in great trouble, leading him to have to leave home, as he has so horribly embarrassed the family honor.

But wait a minute you say, what about Mahima Chowdhary, Urmila Matondkar, and Tara Sharma? Aren't they important to this film? Sadly, no. Chowdhary does a bit of vivacious dancing, but beyond that she is merely wallpaper. As for the stunning Matondkar (sigh!), she isn't even given a single song or dance to tantalize with! She is here merely as a symbol of the challenges that Westernization forces upon traditional Indian family values. Credit must be given to her for chutzpah, though! She must be very confident in her position within the Indian film industry in order to agree to play such an unlikable character. As for Sharma, like Chowdhary she does a bit of a dance floor tease (while wearing a super-mini fringe cowgirl skirt), but she is completely tangential to the plot.

The message of this movie, hammered in again and again, is that the strength to overcome adversity lies NOT in money, but in familial love. And before the end of the film, I'll be damned if I didn't buy it, Bolly-hook, Bolly-line, and tear-drenched Bolly-sinker!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vinyl (2000)
8/10
Pretty damned near brilliant
7 May 2015
Pretty damned near brilliant. Director Zweig interviews, nay - psycho-analyzes, and CROSS-EXAMINES - record collectors in an effort to understand the roots of his own obsessiveness, loneliness and feelings of self-loathing. Among the collectors he's interviews are Harvey Pekar, Guy Madden and Bruce La Bruce, though nobody is identified in the film. Make no mistake, some of the collectors put under his microscope are quite sick, more hoarders than collectors, allowing their obsessions to paint their lives into a frighteningly cluttered corner. Though - as a collector myself - it could be rather painful to watch at times, and though the directors soul-searching occasionally wanders a bit too far, this is really a MUST SEE for any collector!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ha-Trempist (1972)
4/10
If you enjoy laughing AT a tedious film with stoned friends, this might just be for you.
17 August 2014
I believe that Markastzm's review gets everything right, except one very thing. Indeed, he is correct that the mimes and the sharks both represent "The Man", and also that the film does not refute hippie ideals, but rather shows the unrelenting glee "The Man" takes in squashing those embracing those ideals. Markastzm is wrong, however, when he states that "Neither the characters, the actors, nor the director take themselves too seriously". There is an interview with two of the actors on the blu-ray disc and they indicate that took all of this very seriously, and that - to some extent - they all naively thought they were making a important statement. And it is precisely this that makes this film such a jaw-droppingly WTF oddity. Tedious to no end, but also fun in the right mindset with the right group of friends.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Weakness (1933)
8/10
funny, odd and adorable
11 August 2014
I caught a 35mm screening of MY WEAKNESS at the 12th annual Capitolfest in Rome, NY and absolutely adored it. It's a twist on Pygmalion in which an uncouth office cleaning woman (Lilian Harvey) with hidden intentions, agrees to a make-over, leading her to deceive three different men into wanting to marry her... Charles Butterworth, Henry Travers and Lew Ayers. The dialogue is often reminiscent of what one might expect from the mouth of Groucho Marx, and it is laden with innuendo (when chastised for not taking an interest in his uncle's brassier manufacturing business, the playboy nephew indicates he does his best to stay in touch with their product," and in another scene, a saleswoman announces that "brassieres will be half-off on Tuesday".) Best of all is a song titled YOU CAN BE HAD - BE CAREFUL sung by animated nick-knacks, toys, human wine-stopper cork figurines and Rodin's "The Thinker", one figurine ridiculously having the voice of Popeye. Additionally, movie star magazine portraits join the chorus, adding the (imitated?) voices of - among others - Janet Gaynor, Clara Bow and Will Rogers (whose daughter, Mary, also has a role in the film). Also featured in the film - as Cupid - is Harry Langdon.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aberdeen (2014)
7/10
An focus on women's issues with an troubling message
11 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film has a decided focus on women's issues including a look at sexual exploitation in the acting/modeling business, the constant pressure a woman feels to remain young-looking in order to keep their stinkin' husband from cheating, the life of self-loathing that can follow in the wake of certain mother/daughter issues, the bullying a female child is subjected to when she is not seen as being as pretty as her classmates, and the personal and professional difficulties that can come later in life for women judged less attractive. Given this focus, it is peculiar that the film appears to tell parents that they should not worry about their unattractive female children because a) the bullies are more likely to live with guilt over this, than the victims are to be damaged, and b) the girls can always choose to have plastic surgery when they're older! What I WANT to think is that there's a subtitle translation issue, and what was MEANT was that girls choosing plastic surgery should be made to feel no more stigma about doing so, than one should feel in choosing to be a "housewife" over other careers. I fear that this massaging of the message is merely wishful thinking on my part, however. Other qualms: In what world would a young attractive woman be horny for (I don't care if he's a physician of not) an old troll like Eric Tsang? Also, is it possible that a woman in HK – particularly one in the modeling/acting industry – would not have ever considered having oral sex with her husband? And even harder to believe, how is it possible that an extremely handsome and popular man would not have even ever asked his wife if she might consider oral sex? All that said, I enjoyed this film a lot, despite it's ultimate insensitivity to the very issues it observes.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
slow to start, but oh my, what a finish!
28 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A grave robber is chased onto the road and accidentally run over by taxi driver, Philip Ko Fei. Ko Fei gets out of the car to check on the man, but he has disappeared, only to reappear in Ko Fei's back seat. He tells Ko Fei that he is a Taoist wizard and he used black magic to save himself from death. He also tell's Ko Fei that he (Ko Fei) is now cursed to a life of misfortune for having crossing paths with him. Sure enough, we soon discover that Ko Fei's wife is having an affair with the married Norman Chu. Roughly 20 minutes of unspectacular nude romping leads up to Chu refusing her offer of the both of them leaving their spouses for one another. She gets angry and jumps out of the car, but not before the pair have an ugly encounter with a couple of cocky young men in a red sports car. Both cars leave, and the woman then makes her way to a phone booth, where she calls her hubby's taxi dispatcher to ask that they send Ko Fei over immediately to fetch her. Before he gets there, however, the guys in the red sports car return. They abduct her and take her to an abandoned mansion, where one of them rapes her and knocks her about a bit, accidentally causing her to fall over a balcony ledge to her death. Upon arriving at the phone booth, Ko Fei receives another call from the taxi dispatcher informing him that his wife is now at the mansion, a message that seems rather curious, given that nobody at the mansion had access to a phone, and – in fact – when questioned later, the dispatcher says she made no such call to Ko Fei. Ko Fei then seeks out the Taoist wizard for help and THAT is when the film really begins to get good. It takes a LONG time to get to this point (maybe 40 minutes), but everything from this point on is great fun involving a reanimated corpse with a need to be "seeded", the demonic possession of Norman Chu's wife, and the bloody, explosive birth of the corpse's revenge-seeking evil seed!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Swimmer (1968)
8/10
A metaphor for life. We fail to see how quickly it passes.. and how completely we decline.
6 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is an unusual film that follows Neddy (the very fit Burt Lancaster, 53 years old at the time of filming), as he decides to swim (and hike) from one friends private luxury pool located at one end of a large well-to-do county, to his own home at the other end of the county, via a series of widely spread apart pools belonging – mostly - to socialite friends. On it's surface, it can appear to be the story of a man who has lost his money and social position, yet has little or no memory of this loss. What it is actually about, I believe, is the rapid passage of our adult lives. Even in our middle-ages, we start out feeling young, healthy and full of both friends and confidence, yet – far faster than we are able to recognize – we lose one thing after another, usually due to our own poor choices, finally ending up cold, exhausted and alone. This is partially signaled in the film by the ever-faster change of both the seasons and weather, but also in the change in people's attitudes toward Neddy, most dramatically, in the lightening fast change of heart Julie (Janet Landgard) exhibits toward him. To Neddy, she is in one moment infatuated with him, and in the next repulsed, but I contend - in reality - a fair amount of time has passed from the beginning of their stroll together (when she seemed barely more than a child), until the end of their journey, by which point she appears to be a somewhat more mature, experienced woman with an apartment and job in the city. Along his own path in life, Neddy has cheated on his wife, taken fromfriends without giving back, unthinkingly distanced himself from other friends for long periods of time, and deliberately turned his back on childhood friends as he climbed social ladders that they could not. And – seemingly (to him, anyway), in the mere blink of an eye - he realizes that he has lost everything... his wife, his lover, the respect of his children, and every single scrap of his status. He has not only become unwelcome at the pools of his former friends, but has become so "dirty" that he is not even welcome at the public pool, where even the attendants snub and insult him.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mist (2007)
7/10
Entertaining, yet rather troubling re-imagining of NOTLD and DAWN
6 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Frank Darabont, the director of SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION and THE GREEN MILE, once again adapts a Stephen King story and somehow manages to create an entertaining little jump-shocker, despite the story being little more than a rewrite of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD... right down to a horrifyingly downbeat ending. Disappointingly, this films ending lacks the pitch black social criticism of Romero's ending, wherein - of course - the "establishment" rescuers ended up killing the films heroic survivor. Instead, in this version, the rescuers are merely too late to stop our hero from doing something horrific, yet they are seemingly quite successfully at saving many others. Thus, in the end, the "moral" of THE MIST seems to simply be about the power of fear to make us behave toward each other in terrible ways. Sure, there's an important message there, but it lacks the political bite of the message in the film that it borrows from, thus making it feel inferior. And by substituting creatures-from-another-dimension for zombies, the film also loses an additional, dread-inspiring, man-against-himself element.

But enough with comparisons to NOTLD, you say? OK, but there's also this... by setting the story in a supermarket, King has also borrowed significantly from another Romero film, DAWN OF THE DEAD. And sadly, it does so without including any equivalent to DAWN's darkly comic social critique. In short, THE MIST can't help but be compared to these other films, and these comparisons can only leave it lacking. Though I enjoyed THE MIST, and would certainly watch it again, I very much wish King had found a more fully original structure to hang his story on.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dreadnaught (1981)
8/10
Dreadnaught means "Fearless"
30 March 2014
...so I urge those with a fear of subtitles to "man-up" and make an exception for this film, as watching the dubbed version offers a very different, and inferior experience, to watching the subtitled version. The main issue is with the tone, which is more difficult to nail down with the dubbed version. In fact, Sunny Yuen Shun-yi – despite having no lines - comes off more comic than frighteningly psychotic in the dubbed version due to that version's prevailing tone... or rather, its awkward shifts from one tone to another. Sure, quite a lot of the film is comic, and both versions are hampered by scenes of that wacky cross-eyed pie-in-the-face humor that writer Wong Jing so adores, but still... these maddeningly ridiculous bits manage to seem more like "asides" in the subtitled version, thus allowing for far more successful shifts to the scenes of brutal terror. In any case, though often doubled, its nonetheless great to see Kwan Tak-hing (in his final film appearance) as the legendary Wong Fei-hung, a role he played in over 100 other films! Also, Leung Ka-yan (aka, "Beardy", though entirely beardless here) is as likable as ever, even though he is portraying a particularly trouble-making version of Master Wong's famed protégé, Leung Foon. Highlights include two terrific Lion Dances (the 2nd even more fantastic than the 1st), a classic bout of Tailor-fu (Fung Hark-on vs. Kwan Tak-hing), some very clever Doctor-fu (Shan Kwai/San Kuai vs. Kwan Tak-hing), and Lili Li as the scolding sister of Yuen Biao, who manages to teach him Laundy-fu without his being aware of it, a skill that - naturally - comes in quite handy in a final confrontation between Biao and Shun-yi. Yuen Woo-ping, of course, directs and choreographs the action with an assist from his famed "Yuen Clan". Also starring Philip Ko Fei as Wong Fei-hung's crosstown nemesis
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Keep your finger on fast-forward and you might survive this atrocity
17 February 2014
OK, so this has its moments of "so bad, it's good", but they are much too few and far between. Try sitting through even the short version without fast-forwarding only if you are in need of sleep or seriously enjoy self-inflicted pain. Otherwise, fans of even the worst cinematic dreck should simply watch the 1st five or six minutes of this to capture the flavor of the fiasco, and then scan forward to scenes where new characters are introduced. Or better yet, look for the sampler reel currently available on youtube. "Highlights" of the film include the unbelievably horrible line readings of the lead child actor (the son of director Barry Mahon), the first poorly-timed "moo" of the paper-mache cow (actually just the head of a cow), the "why am I even here" lethargy of poorly-recorded "The Pumpkinhead", and - I suppose - the flying, talking reindeer and the "The Wogglebug". And, oh yes, the mini-skirted army of Gen. Jinjur, actresses that were likely borrowed from the cast of the two adult features Mahon was making (FANNY HILL MEETS THE RED BARON and FANNY HILL MEETS DR. EROTICO) around the very same time that this film was in production.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed