Reviews

24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
J'accuse! (1919)
10/10
Phenomenal film deserving much wider audience
6 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The 2006 restoration of this amazing 1919 film presents one of the very best opportunities to learn about the period from watching a contemporaneous film. Aesthetically, it stands on its own merit as a completely engaging and emotional piece, which on the whole deserves a much wider audience. The restoration drops whatever there was of a phony happy ending in the 1922 re-release, and adds an excellent score by Robert Israel. Israel scores are a quick tip that a silent film has been given a sensitive and elegant restoration that will be very palatable to modern tastes.

The story is a complex family/romantic melodrama built around a poet in love with a woman trapped in a bad marriage to a violent man. With the war, the two men become comrades in arms, and complications ensue. (I really dislike reviews that go on and on telling the film's story. If someone is going to watch the movie, it is up to the director to tell the story in his own style and at his own pace.) I believe the film is mischaracterized as an anti-war film. No one is really for war, so a realistic film like this by a veteran and using real footage will include a lot of pathos that will serve the purpose of an anti-war message. But everyone is anti-war, the difference between a pro-war and and an anti-war film is that a pro-war film blames the war on the enemy and creates situations for nobility based on service of the just cause. An anti-war film turns the proponents of war into greedy liars, emphasizes the humanity of the enemy, and creates situations for nobility based on refusal to participate in the war. So defined, this piece (like The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse - 1921) is a pro-war film.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Animal Porn
22 February 2011
When I refer to this film as "animal porn" I do not mean that in a derogatory way. I caught an on-campus screening of this film in the mid-1970's when I was an undergraduate at the University of Southern California, and it must be something special if it can stay in my mind for more than 35 years. I remember it as a beautifully composed film both in its photography and music. You just need to be warned in advance that if you are offended by graphic images of sexual intercourse and childbirth then you need to skip this film even if you can find a way to see it.

For now I suppose you need to add it to your "My Movies" wish list and catch a cable showing or be in the loop when we reach that state of post-Enlightenment such that the film will be available on DVD.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3 Women (1977)
10/10
Shock of the Familiar
1 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is a dreamy and at the same time intensely realistic film about the life of one or two or three women living empty, lonely lives in a small California desert town. If you have not already seen it, and if you like any films by Ingmar Bergman or Robert Altman or David Lynch, then stop reading this or any other review and see the film for yourself.

The fun of a movie like this, that is so realistic that it has no "correct" interpretation and even the movie's director and writer is not entirely sure what it "means," is to come up with your own theories and share with others who saw the film. My theory is that the three women are all separate individuals, who are alike in the sense that we are all one, but who are not alike in the way female characters/actresses are the same person in Persona, That Obscure Object of Desire, or Mulholland Drive. The sweet old couple really are Pinky's parents, and the suicide attempt leaves Pinky with amnesia, which is why she forgets her parents and confuses herself with Millie as she tries to reconstruct her life. Poor old Edgar gets shot by one of the women, or maybe all three, who make it look like an accident. It makes no sense for his body to be hidden in the tires, as that would not be an effective way of hiding him, the stench would attract attention, and the staged accident is consistent with a traditional body disposal. But maybe it is his body, just because stuff that happens in real life often makes no sense.

The real fun of this movie for me was the shock of the familiar, in picking out the tacky details of real life circa 1977. I was 20 when the film came out, and yes I do remember making shrimp cocktails, and cooking pigs-in-a-blanket like it was a new gourmet treat, and sorting out Sociables crackers eating the broken ones and saving the whole ones for company with canned cheese squirted on. I even had one of those silly laugh-toys (not a hag face, just a little box in a felt bag) that made the laughing sound and cracked everyone up. I didn't smoke Trues or drive a Ford Pinto, but I was around others who did.

And the Shelly Duvall character, with the heart of gold who lies constantly to try to make herself more interesting and who tries so hard to make everything perfect she annoys all the people she is trying to befriend? Too real.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gentle metaphor for culture wars
11 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Autobiographical documentary directed by and starring Julia Pimsleur in which she films her reunion with her long lost brother, Marc. Julia is a bisexual New York Jewish film maker and Yale grad, and brother has dropped out of UC Berkley, become a born-again Christian, and moved for the past ten years to a commune of like-minded folk on an Alaska farm.

At the risk of a plot spoiler, there is sort of no punch line or expose to this reunion. Brother is about as loopy as any born-again Christian, and sister is a bit annoying in trying to bait her brother into a debate, but ultimately they both accept each other, and there is nothing to suggest any improper activity or compulsion at work on the commune. Where the film is interesting is as a positive role model for how real people at opposite ends of the current culture wars can hang together in peace.

Its hard to know how to rate a personal film with minimal production values that you watch on the web. Are we comparing it to Casablanca? Or to home movies on YouTube? I will say that it is interesting and worthwhile.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My Big Fat Greek Vacation
6 June 2009
Early voters are being a little to hard on this feel-good romantic comedy/Greek travel infomercial. Nia Vardolos is a Greek-American expatriate in Greece, overqualified and unhappy with her temporary job as a tour guide. Nia rolls her pretty eyes at the prospect of entertaining a tacky crew of caricatured tourists, which include Richard Dreyfuss as a jokester and Rachel Dratch as an absurd American. Alexis Georgoulis is their hairy driver.

The jokes are pretty hit and miss, with mostly hits after the bus gets rolling a bit. This is a warm, accessible, and engaging film, that will satisfy fans of MBFGW who do not burden the film with too much in the way of expectation.
46 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
South Park: I'm a Little Bit Country (2003)
Season 7, Episode 4
9/10
Perceptive social and political commentary
4 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
South Park does not get all the credit it deserves as our time's most perceptive and fearless source of social and political commentary. This 2003 episode is one of the best examples. The kids can serve as neutral observers to the angry confrontation between adults in the left-wing "war is not the answer" faction against the right-wing "support the troops" faction. The opposing camps have competing permits for the same space, so a direct acting out of American culture wars is coming.

It is hard to imagine a more complete and perceptive chronicling of the intense division that was part of the real world circa 2003 over the war in Iraq. It is interesting that this is an episode where they got Norman Lear as a collaborator and guest voice, as the usually right-leaning Parker and Stone manage a balanced and completely ingenious resolution of the culture-wars conflict, which manages to puncture the pretense on both sides.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intelligent trash
24 April 2009
Tromeo is a trashy love story based on and borrowing from the Shakespeare classic. Kaufman seeks out opportunities for shocking visuals, all of which are softened by a consistently humorous and cartoonish mood. No subject is taboo, as incest, child abuse, masturbation, and priest molestation are all explored with a free, irreverent spirit. There are sequences in which silent film slapstick routines are redone with post-censorship, midnight movie gross-out sensibilities. Plus you can count on sex scenes with an appropriate reverence for the beauty of female breasts.

Interwined with the goofy gross-outs and the near-soft-core sex is a subtle and intelligent social commentary about the absurdity of life in the 1990's, mainly the lost-generation Gen-X types.

I saw it at a 4/2009 festival where Kaufman was around for Q & A and if you want to blame someone for spreading the rumor that the film is all in iambic pentameter you can start with the film's director because he made the claim twice. It didn't sound like pentameter to me, except for the passages taken from Shakespeare, and a few passages carefully written in a Shakespearean style.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Engaging biography of Cash and of Glen Sherley
24 April 2009
This is a documentary that uses Johnny Cash's 1968 Folsom Prison performance as the pivot point for telling his life story, with interesting subplots about two of the inmates present at the concert, notably country music artist Glen Sherley who was essentially discovered by Cash as part of the concert event. There was no actual video of the concert, so we get interviews with Cash's and Sherley's kids, as well as with back-up musicians, etc., with still photographs, archival footage, and some interesting animation sequences.

I caught an afternoon showing at the Newport Beach Film Festival, and it is hard to imagine that this film will generate a lot of excitement in any theatrical release. It will work well on television, and if you get a chance to see it you will be rewarded with a balanced and engaging account of a complex and interesting man.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love story with audience
21 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The real love story in this classic is between the director Fellini and his life-long wife, Giulietta Masina. The person who falls in love with Cabiria is you sitting in the audience. In the audience, we share a number of intimate moments with Cabiria like when she is alone in the movie star's bathroom, and when she is praying to the Madonna for a better life, and when she is preparing hopefully for her marriage. No character in the film ever gets to know her as intimately as we do.

In the film's denouement, she is sort of walking off into the future with us as her adoring audience. We share with her the little smile when she sees reason for hope among the young people playing music.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wonderful as history
29 June 2008
Romantic comedy starring Lauren Bacall as a model who bluffs her way into a sublease of a swanky Manhattan apartment rooming with two model friends with each scheming to marry a millionaire. This is an entertaining but superficial chick-flick meditating whether a gal should marry for love or money, or if you can maybe get both. Along with The Robe this was the premiere event for CinemaScope, and it also provided a breathless introduction to stereophonic sound.

As a romantic comedy it is imperfect, and it is ironically hampered by the very things that made it important in its original release. The grand images intended for magnificent CinemaScope will only appear smaller than normal on your small-screen television with horizontal black bars, or will be absurdly distorted to fit the aspect ratio of your monitor. And the stereo means nothing to us now, so the film's frequent side-trips into sound and scenery gimmicks are only a distraction to us now.

But as a historical peek at its time this film really delivers. You get the tacky materialism and newly-found hedonism of the beginning of post-war prosperity in the early 1950's, as well as a nervous examination of the changing social mores around the role of women. Plus you get a wonderful record of what New York City looked like circa 1953, and a gee-whiz tribute to the new phenomenon of commercial air travel.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hard core Fields fans only
18 April 2008
Chaplin-esquire comedy/melodrama directed by D. W. Griffith starring Carol Dempster as a plucky orphan raised on the road by a sideshow hustler (W. C. Fields) without knowing she is the granddaughter of a rich New England family. The only real attraction of this film is the chance to see a young, fit W. C. Fields in the early version of his likable-hustler persona. There are some cool juggling scenes, and some big-circus scenes that are nice but not worth going out of your way for.

Everything else is a couple beats off. Griffith's strength is in melodrama and social commentary, but here he bogs down in a bad version of of slapstick, forcing Fields to imitate Chaplin in a way that detracts from our enjoyment of Fields being Fields.

Griffith also cast his generally untalented girlfriend-at-the-time Carol Dempster in a role she was not equal to. She needs to carry the whole film and can't. With Fields we miss too much by not hearing his voice.

Then there's the length which should be shorter by a good twenty minutes given the reliance on slapstick and the simplicity of the plot. So for Griffith you're better off with his earlier work, and with Fields you want his later work, and for mid-20's slapstick you want to stick to Chaplin, Keaton, Lloyd, Charley Chase and Harry Langdon.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dull Documentary
19 February 2007
A day in the life of 1920's Berlin, with arty mechanical shots, and a variety of urban experiences united by their time of day. This is painfully dull to watch, and has no continuity in terms of story line or characters. Its nice to have an authentic look at the past, and some of the mechanical shots, the whimsical statue-figure shots, and the evening entertainment shots are interesting, but overall it is a massive chore to sit through. It could be the overbearing score that pounds home the urban theme with a punishing tone that detracts from the film, and a kindler and gentler score could mitigate the films lack of entertainment value. Score or not, the overrating on this site of this film is beyond comprehension. People who claim to like this film deserve to watch Man With A Camera, the Russian version of the same thing, which is equally tedious.
1 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Significant early propaganda
2 February 2007
Populist/Progressive propaganda directed by D. W. Griffith about a wealthy commodities speculator who is indifferent to the suffering caused by the price distortions following his monopolization of wheat. Comments of the other reviewers are a bit harsh, its only a 14-minute film so it can only do so much in the way of character development or plot. While it is creepy to see Griffith outflank later Communist propaganda to the left, you still have to admire the cinematic achievement. Griffith is using a comparative editing technique generally attributed to Eisenstein, but sixteen years before Eisenstein's first film, so the short is a must-see for cinema students for that reason alone. For the rest of us, it is an engaging fourteen minutes that delivers powerful images, notwithstanding its questionable footing in economic theory.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Did we watch the same movie?
15 January 2007
Documentary about nomadic Persians making a treacherous traverse of massive mountains to get their herds to grass. Watching this silent, black and white feature, marred in part by a twink-twink-twink Oriental music score that could not have been used in the original exhibition, is even duller than it sounds. The spectacular scenery is lost on a small black and white screen, and there is an utter failure to establish any kind of plot line. I loved Nanook of the North and March of the Penguins, but despised this movie, notwithstanding the similarity of the theme. Physical hardships alone are just not that interesting.
2 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Silent romance
8 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Romantic melodrama starring Gloria Swanson as the devoted daughter to a cash-strapped captain. Swanson agrees to marriage with a fat, old, social-climbing grocery tycoon, but on her disappointing honeymoon she falls in love with a young British aristocrat (Rudolph Valentino). The powerhouse combination of director Sam Wood with arguably the two best actors in the romantic silent melodrama genre delivers an engaging and touching story.

How you react to any film depends on your expectations, so it seems that people seeing all the hype about the significance of the recent reclamation of the film were expecting too much. Going in with no expectations, I was enthralled by how really touching an old-fashioned love story can be when the characters do virtually nothing more than exchange glances and graze each other's hands. The attention to detail in the wardrobe, the exotic locations, and the dreamy depiction of British aristocracy in the early 20th Century, make this a must-see for fans of the genre.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not an anti-war film
1 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Romantic wartime adventure starring Rudolph Valentino as a wealthy Argentine-born Frenchman who travels to Paris, teaches ladies to tango, and has an affair with a married woman that becomes complicated by the onset of the Great War. The film is a comprehensive, albeit maudlin, account of WW1 from the French perspective, and succeeded in 1921 as a means for the families of wartime casualties to process their grief.

I disagree with the comments calling this an anti-war film. A pro-war position will often include intense grief over the casualties of war, but will see those casualties as necessary, and serving a great cause. In The Four Horsemen, the French are noble, the Germans are virtually all monsters, the Americans are heroes, and the only really unsympathetic character (besides the Germans) is the Frenchman who shirks his patriotic duties.

All Quiet On the Western Front is an anti-war film, but The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse makes you want to put on a uniform and fight.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Anti-Klan melodrama
21 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Silent romantic melodrama about a moody WWI vet who returns from war hoping to consummate his marriage, only to find his marriage has been annulled and his ex is married to another. He's then put in a precarious position between the sexually aggressive ex and her new hubby's "Order" of moral vigilantes.

Users who see this as a pro-Klan film are missing the point of the movie, and failing to check their history. There actually were incidents of Klan groups in Alabama in 1927 (the year before release of this film) practicing vigilante punishments, including flogging, of whites who had committed moral transgressions. Far from being "untouchable" in 1928, the daily newspaper in Montgomery, Alabama ran a series of editorials against the Klan, for which it was awarded a Pulitzer Prize. In 1928, a Catholic was elected governor of Alabama, and Klan membership began to fade.

The Mating Call is clearly part of the mainstream backlash against the Klan. The only Klan member is an outright hypocrite, and the Klan vigilantes are shown whipping an innocent man. Where does anyone get favorable treatment from that?
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bananas (1971)
Self-consciously absurd satire
30 March 2006
Social satire starring Woody Allen as a neurotic New Yorker who is frustrated by not being taken seriously by his politically active girlfriend (Louise Lasser) and thus travels to a troubled South America dictatorship to join a revolution. Allen uses an absurd, frenetic style in which styles of dialogue and conventions from films and television are intentionally mixed and juxtaposed to spray satire in every direction and expose the essential ridiculous nature of everyone and everything. Its a work of pure genius with allusions to Eisenstein and the Marx Brothers, as well as to Wide Wide World of Sports, but one can understand the frustration of some viewers with the apparently disconnected narrative.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rent (2005)
Great music, mediocre politics
2 December 2005
Enthusiastic rock musical about an group of arty friends who deal with AIDS, poverty, and urban land reform. Sort of. Actually, the plot wanders away from its progressive politics and into a Friends-ensemble of who is sleeping with whom intrigue. Love it or hate it, if you were a fan of Hair or Moulin Rouge or Chicago you might consider this the event of the year, and if not you might be incredibly bored.

For this reviewer, the irony is that in pretending to depict poverty and AIDS, the film is full of healthy, strong, athletic young people who look like the cream of the crop out of a performing arts high school in an upper-middle-class suburb. They help the poor by putting on a multi-media performance-art protest, and they stick it to the man by dancing around on tables in a restaurant. Yeah, OK.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Biting satire in heartfelt love story
24 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Quirky, comic love story starring Joseph Bologna and Renee Taylor as neurotic misfits who meet at a group therapy encounter session and reluctantly fall in love. Over-the-top satire is used to needle the touchy-feely psychotherapy process, as well as the surrealistic dysfunctional families that created the intensely flawed central characters.

Through angry encounters, the two lovers begin vomiting out uncomfortable truths, and then settle into a warm zone of mutual acceptance and intimacy. Near the end, Bologna blurts out that 'I love you, but I don't want to love you. I want to love someone prettier than you and smarter than you. But that person may never come along so I have to settle for you.' The real plot resolution does not come until the film's final frozen frame, when you see the two look at each other with an amused, knowing smile. The real happy ending is when you find out that Bologna and Taylor were married for six years at the time they both wrote and starred in the film, and that as of 2005 they have still been married for 40 years.

Happy anniversary, congratulations, and thanks for a great film.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If you like video games . . .
31 May 2005
A two hour and twenty minute explanation of how a fine young Jedi warrior could wind up as Darth Vader. The fable is told with an orgy of top grade special effects. It is a must-see for teen geeks, but for mature audiences it is like watching a teenager play a video game with the volume too high. If you saw the original Star Wars when it came out in 1977, you are too old to still be watching Star Wars movies.

The stylized dialog is especially annoying. Does not create wisdom, to alter syntax. Is still drivel, what you say.

The Star Wars world displaces itself from the present with futuristic technology, Renaissance chivalry, Medieval mysticism, and the politics of ancient Rome. To its credit, Episode 3 manages to wink at the present by jabbing George W.'s anti-evil rhetoric, and by offering a cynical view of the warfare that is by all six of the films otherwise glamorized and idealized.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sahara (2005)
Entertaining and underrated
20 May 2005
Matthew McConaughey as navy veteran turned treasure hunter whose bravery, resourcefulness, and spirit make him near super-human as hero. Your willingness to suspend disbelief in the face of cartoonish plot turns and physical improbabilities will affect your ability to enjoy this cheerful addition to the Indiana Jones genre.

Critics may be treating this polished popcorn flick a bit harshly as a backlash against the implicitly conservative politics. The movie consciously sets itself up as a dreamy metaphor to justify American foreign policy. We just want to help people, cure diseases, and get slimy bad guys out of power. If we find any treasure, its all stuff that floated over from the United States anyway. And all it takes to save the world is a handful of regular folks from Western Civilization with a little ingenuity and some loud classic rock.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vera Drake (2004)
Contrived and manipulative
25 October 2004
Apple-cheeked Imelda Staunton stars as a saint-like old dearie who brightens up the dark and gloomy world of lower-class post-war England by cheerfully caring for her family, caring for every invalid in the neighborhood, cleaning the houses of the idle rich, and just as cheerfully performing homey abortions for girls too poor to pay the outrageous price demanded by the medical profession to skirt England's then-extant anti-abortion laws.

The movie scores major points for portraying the collective post-traumatic stress of post-war Brits, and it scores more points for treating every character humanely. Even the police and lawyers are sympathetically portrayed, so there are no real villains (with the possible exception of Vera's manipulative friend who profits by Vera's generosity and simplicity).

Where I made a mistake was reading that writer/director Leigh was conscious of the film's political import, and timed its release to coincide with the American presidential election. This illuminated how contrived, maudlin, and exaggerated the anti-abortion rhetorical point is made. Like making Vera so larger-than-life sweet that we spend half the film falling in love with her while we watch her whistle while she works. Then Leigh conveniently drops numbers to highlight that a rich girl in trouble could get a legal abortion for 100 or 150 pounds (or guineas -- what's the difference?) which is about 4 or 6 times the cost of a new washing machine, and 50 to 75 times what poor girls pay for the illegal syringe-and-soap job served up by Vera.

I am 1000% in favor of keeping abortion safe and legal, but I just don't like being manipulated.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
High impact social drama
25 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Humorless but powerful social drama starring Catalina Moreno as a brave but necessity-driven Colombian girl who is exploited as a "mula" by drug smugglers. The film is a well-researched and thorough exposition of how poor Colombians are abused by a scheme in which they put their lives at risk by carrying drugs in their stomachs. It has a foreign-film feel, but was actually written and directed by American white-boy Josh Marston.

The first third of the movie drags us through the pathetic circumstances of family necessity that push newly-pregnant Moreno to the big city in hope of earning some cash. Next comes an extended second act in which we are mercilessly exposed to the graphic detail of how obscene amounts of the potentially lethal contraband are gagged down by the mules (think Fear Factor without the music). The third act involves the actual smuggling, which goes in to traditionally structured cinematic conventions of crisis and conflict.

Two things sweeten what would otherwise be a bitter pill, long on importance and short on entertainment. One is the fact that nearly every frame includes Moreno's pretty face, and we are ultimately encouraged by her resourcefulness and courage. The other is the inspiring presence of real-life hero Orlando Tobon ("Don Fernando"), whose real-world travel agency and charitable efforts on behalf of the mules become the centerpiece of the film's American segments.

Movie snobs like moi will consider Maria time well spent, but don't go expecting a war-on-drugs action-adventure shoot-em-up.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed