pedroquintaoo's Reviews

Until Dawn (2025)

4/10

25 April 2025

Warning: Spoilers

Adapting Until Dawn into a feature film was always going to be a tough challenge. The game is beloved by horror fans not just for its immersive atmosphere, tension and iconic creatures, but also because it places the player at the centre of every decision, directly influencing who lives and who dies. Compressing all of that into a film under two hours was a delicate balancing act and, unfortunately, it falls completely flat.

At first, I was actually intrigued by the announced premise: a young woman searching for her missing sister joins a group of friends on a road trip to a remote location, where they end up trapped in a deadly time loop, forced to survive again and again until dawn. The time loop concept, while not entirely new, seemed like it could offer a fresh twist to the Until Dawn universe. And for a while, the film held my attention, the pace is quick, it doesn't get bogged down in lengthy exposition, and the deaths are frequent, violent and surprisingly graphic for a mainstream horror film. But the moment it tries to tie itself to the game's universe, things begin to fall apart.

The characters are paper-thin, like NPCs in Grand Theft Auto. There's no effort to make them interesting, relatable or even remotely engaging. The protagonist, Clover, is one of the most forgettable lead characters I've seen in hundreds of horror films. No presence, no charisma, no inner conflict. It doesn't help that the cast is stuck delivering forced dialogue and clunky writing from the very first scene. And if we don't care about the characters, the impact of the deaths, no matter how gory, is completely lost.

The film's biggest mistake, however, is the way it clumsily forces a connection to the original game. What should've felt like a tribute ends up dragging the entire narrative down.

(SPOILERS) The changes to the Wendigo lore are almost offensive.

In the game, Wendigos are humans who resorted to cannibalism, agile, fast, nearly unkillable creatures with armoured skin that can only be weakened by fire. Here, they're portrayed as people who failed to survive the time loop and gradually transform into monsters each time they die. This rewrite strips the Wendigos of their mythological weight and just doesn't make sense.

On top of that, the final act's mental hospital sequence was a narrative mess. I couldn't follow it, and I'm honestly not sure whether it was poorly explained or if I'd already tuned out by that point. It felt like a desperate attempt to shoehorn Peter Stormare's Dr. Hill into the plot, a role that should've brought gravitas but only highlights how much the writers relied on nostalgia over storytelling. The explanation of the time loop felt like something I would've come up with at age seven in a rushed school assignment: no logic, no structure, no clarity.

Still within spoiler territory, there's one particularly shameless decision in the third act: the story jumps from night five to night thirteen, skipping several crucial nights entirely. The characters don't remember what happened, until one of them pulls out a phone and plays a two-minute montage of them fighting various monsters and threats. It's laughably lazy, likely a budget or runtime workaround, but one that completely breaks immersion.

(END OF SPOILERS)

In the end, this version of Until Dawn feels more like a cheap haunted house attraction: loud, messy, full of random scares and little else. Yes, the kills are creative and the practical effects deserve some credit, but that's irrelevant when there's no strong story or characters to care about.

Despite everything, I still believe the film could've worked better if it had been a standalone project with no ties to the game. Until Dawn fails both as an adaptation and as a horror movie. To me, it's just a disjointed collection of scenes, loosely held together by an idea that never reaches its potential. Still, who knows, maybe others will enjoy the chaos more than I did.

11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Final Destination 5 (2011)

7/10

Very good

23 April 2025

Warning: Spoilers

The first time I watched Final Destination 5, I didn't really enjoy it. But on a second viewing, I realised it's actually one of the best entries in the series.

Unlike the much-criticised fourth film, which drowns in CGI and recycled ideas with weak direction, this fifth chapter brings back some of the spirit of the saga's best moments. The story feels tighter, the characters have a bit more depth (even if none are truly memorable), and there's a clear effort to add something fresh to the formula, even if it's already very familiar.

One of the biggest strengths here is how the characters are more human. Their reactions and behaviour feel more natural, and that helps us connect with them. There's not a lot of deep emotional storytelling, but the attempt to make them feel less like disposable pieces is noticeable and welcome.

Final Destination 5 doesn't reinvent anything, but it has that fresh touch that makes a difference. It doesn't take itself too seriously, but it also avoids becoming silly. There's a more grounded tone that works well.

The main weak point, though, remains one of the franchise's key elements: the deaths. The suspense that made the first three films so effective is almost completely gone. Most scenes feel overly fake, and the CGI often ruins the impact. Everything looks so digital that it takes away the shock value, the violence, and even the dark humour that has always defined this series.

Still, Final Destination 5 stands out because of how it wraps things up. There's a final twist that's clever and shows there's still creativity left in this universe.

(SPOILERS) The ending twist left me torn. On one hand, I loved the unexpected connection to the original film. I even tried to spot clues during the movie to see if it was set in the '90s - and yes, they were there, just very subtle. On the other hand, I was disappointed that once again all the characters are killed off. It's a common move in horror, but I've never liked endings where no one survives. It had already happened before in the saga, and it repeats here. Still, I do respect how they tied it back to the first film.

(ENDING OF THE SPOILERS)

The opening credits also deserve a mention. Like Final Destination 4 (which was weak overall but had a strong intro), this one starts with a striking and stylish sequence that sets the tone perfectly. If Final Destination: Bloodlines wants to make a strong first impression, this is a format worth following.

Overall, I'd rank Final Destination 5 alongside the second film in terms of quality, just below the third, which I still think is the best of the saga. It's a return to form and proof that there's still room for good ideas within this formula.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Final Destination (2009)

4/10

Mediocre

23 April 2025

The Final Destination saga has always thrived on a simple concept, and for the most part, it's known how to entertain horror fans. But by the time we get to The Final Destination (2009), it's clear the formula is not just wearing thin - it's being handled with a carelessness that borders on disrespect for the franchise itself.

Revisiting this fourth entry, 15 years after last watching it, I found it even worse than I remembered. What once had a certain guilty pleasure charm now comes across as a cringeworthy exercise in generic horror, more interested in showcasing dated CGI and forced 3D effects than in building tension or engaging storytelling. The lead, played by Bobby Campo, lacks any kind of charisma: he's expressionless, passive, and forgettable. Instead of leading the narrative, he seems dragged along by it, like a background extra in a story that needs a protagonist with at least a hint of emotional depth - which he doesn't provide.

And if the lead falls short, the supporting cast fares even worse. They're empty molds, stereotypes serving only as placeholders for the next death scene. While the franchise has never focused on deep character development, the lack of care here is shocking - as if we're watching a low-budget TV movie from a studio like The Asylum, known for titles like Sharknado.

The CGI is, without exaggeration, some of the worst seen in any 2000s blockbuster. The deaths feel weightless and fake, like poorly rendered video game cutscenes from the PlayStation 3 era. The central disaster - a racetrack crash - is by far the weakest of the series: predictable, poorly edited, tensionless, and completely forgettable. What used to feel like a gut punch in previous films now lands like a limp slap.

The movie tries to mask its technical shortcomings with an overuse of 3D, which was trendy at the time, but it only highlights how empty the experience is. There's no suspense. The deaths, which used to make us fear everyday objects, now happen with no build-up, no rhythm, no soul. Worst of all, Death itself feels almost absent - reduced to an invisible force that pushes over spray cans or unscrews bolts.

Only two moments are worth mentioning: the final sequence in the mall, which manages some tension using a common household item, and the opening credits, which offer a fast-paced homage to deaths from earlier films. But that's far from enough to save a film that fails on nearly every level.

The Final Destination isn't just a weak film - it's a step backward. A low point in a saga that, despite its flaws, has managed to deliver solid entertainment in the past. This entry is a clear example of how a good idea can be ruined by bad choices, bad acting, and a complete lack of ambition.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Final Destination 3 (2006)

8/10

One of the best horror movies of 2000's

23 April 2025

No doubt Final Destination 3 is the high point of the saga so far. While it still carries some of the narrative issues from the previous films - especially when it comes to the treatment of secondary characters, who mostly exist as "cannon fodder" for the death scenes - this third chapter manages to stand out for several reasons. The lead, played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and her friend are more carefully developed, giving us characters we can actually connect with and follow with some emotional involvement. Not that the previous films lacked this entirely, but here there's a slightly deeper emotional layer.

The film's pacing is another strong point. From the very first scene to the end, it holds your attention. And the idea of using photographs to predict the next death is a clever addition that plays well into the saga's formula.

The deaths are creative, intense, and completely over the top. The tanning bed scene has already become iconic and remains one of the standout moments of the entire franchise.

The opening disaster, set on a roller coaster, is absolutely unforgettable. If the highway crash in Final Destination 2 made us fear logging trucks, this one is the reason I avoid theme park rides altogether.

Unfortunately, the ending doesn't live up to the rest of the film. It feels forced - a lazy attempt to wrap things up by falling back into the usual cycle. Still, Final Destination 3 isn't a masterpiece, but it's undeniably one of the biggest highlights of 2000s mainstream horror.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Final Destination 2 (2003)

8/10

Better than the first

23 April 2025

If the first Final Destination was the kick-off for an original but still hesitant idea, it's in Final Destination 2 that the franchise truly begins to find its identity. Here, you can tell the creators understood what the audience was looking for: more tension, more creativity in the deaths, and a tone that leans more openly into fun - all while keeping the suspense that drives the concept.

This second chapter expands the universe of the first film in a smart way, introducing the idea that there's a logic behind the death order and that maybe, just maybe, there's a way to break the cycle. The exploration of this "lore" feels natural and not overly explained. The plot is tighter, more to the point, with no unnecessary arcs or characters wandering through irrelevant subplots.

Ali Larter's return is one of the film's strongest points. Her presence adds emotional continuity and acts as a bridge between the two stories. The new cast, while not deeply developed, has more charm than the first film's group, and their dynamic ends up working surprisingly well.

And of course, you can't talk about this film without mentioning the highway crash scene - in my opinion, the most memorable moment of the entire series. It's so iconic it's become a part of pop culture, to the point where no one looks at a truck carrying logs the same way again. The deaths that follow are bolder and more inventive than those in the original, building up suspense that keeps you constantly on edge.

Final Destination 2 isn't a horror masterpiece, but it's a clear example of how a sequel can take an original concept and make it more effective and impactful. This is where the tone that defines the saga really settles in. A film that entertains, shocks, and - most importantly - keeps you hooked until the very end.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Sinners (2025)

6/10

It's not a game changer

19 April 2025

Warning: Spoilers

Sinners has been one of the most talked-about films lately, especially after reaching an impressive 97% on Rotten Tomatoes. Maybe that's why I walked in with very high expectations. The truth is, while I can see its qualities, I left the cinema with mixed feelings. This is a film with something to say, but it often feels stuck between what it wants to be and what it actually delivers.

The story takes a long time to get going. For about an hour and twenty minutes, we follow the daily lives of twin brothers, both played by Michael B. Jordan. His performance is solid and charismatic, but I often found it hard to tell the characters apart - they look and act so similarly that it caused some confusion. During this first part, there's very little tension, and the promise of horror slowly fades away in a series of dialogues and social interactions. These scenes touch on important themes like racism, slavery, and cultural heritage, but for viewers expecting action and horror, this section might feel slow and directionless.

The big issue is that Sinners presents itself as a vampire film - but for most of its runtime, it seems to forget that. Only in the final third does the horror really arrive. Visually, those scenes are well executed, with solid CGI, nice camera work, and carefully planned night-time lighting. But even then, everything feels predictable and lacks emotional impact. The film seems unsure whether it wants to be a deep psychological story or a bloody horror flick, and by trying to be a bit of both, it doesn't fully commit to either.

Surprisingly, the best moment comes after the credits. The post-credits scene is a gem - smart, bold, and with a twist that actually made me want to see more. Honestly, they could have cut 30 minutes from the main film and developed that twist instead. It's one of the best post-credits scenes I've seen in recent years, and a real lesson for studios like Marvel, which have made this format feel repetitive and pointless.

In comparison, Sinners could have followed a more mature path like Let the Right One In or even Get Out - films that use horror to explore deep human issues or strong social commentary. Instead, it ends up somewhere between social critique and generic entertainment, and misses the chance to stand out.

In the end, Sinners is entertaining and touches on important historical topics, but it doesn't fully deliver on the promise of thrilling horror or a truly gripping story. I enjoyed parts of it, but I doubt it'll stay in my memory as a standout in the genre.

224 out of 367 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Novocaine (2025)

8/10

Very good

16 April 2025

Novocaine is a surprising entry in the world of action films. At first glance, it might seem like just another generic action movie in the style of John Wick or Nobody. But its premise - a protagonist who is immune to pain and uses his own body as a weapon - ends up being a refreshing twist on the genre. The physical violence is intense and graphic, acting as a metaphor for his inability to feel the consequences of his actions.

The cast is solid, with a standout performance from Jack Quaid, who manages to show both vulnerability and raw power. The story isn't groundbreaking, but it delivers a great plot twist that keeps us hooked until the end. That said, the film does suffer from a predictable subplot: the police chasing the protagonist, thinking he's helping the villains. It's a tired cliché we've seen in dozens of other films.

As mentioned, the violence is one of Novocaine's strongest points. It's brutal and uncomfortable, never shying away from the physical toll of constant fighting. That helps set the film apart, though it might be a bit much for more sensitive viewers.

In short, Novocaine stands out thanks to its original concept and the raw intensity of its fight scenes. It falls into a few predictable traps, but overall, it keeps the audience engaged right up to the end. It's not a masterpiece, but for action fans, it's a solid and entertaining watch.

2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Drop (2025)

8/10

An awesome surprise

12 April 2025

Drop was a pleasant surprise - I really wasn't expecting to enjoy it as much as I did. It's not an innovative film within the genre, but it does exactly what it sets out to do: entertain from start to finish.

Christopher Landon once again proves he knows how to build immersive, tension-filled environments while keeping the story accessible to a wide audience, from younger viewers to older ones. Even though most of the action takes place in a single location, the narrative never feels repetitive. There's mystery in every scene and a fast-paced rhythm that keeps you glued to the screen. There's always something happening - a new question, a new consequence, a small twist that makes you want to see what comes next.

The main character is well written - not in deep emotional terms, but in a way that makes it easy for us to relate to her. It's easy to imagine what we would do in her place, how we would react, what choices we'd make. That connection draws us into the story even more.

Drop doesn't try to be more than it is, and that works in its favour. It's a proper popcorn flick - in the best sense of the term. It knows how to entertain, how to keep your attention, and when to end. For me, it's one of the best thrillers of its kind I've seen this year. If you're looking for a fun, intense movie with a strong sense of mystery that keeps you hooked until the last second, this one is definitely worth seeing on the big screen.

0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Caddo Lake (2024)

6/10

Not bad

9 April 2025

Warning: Spoilers

Caddo Lake is one of those thrillers that tries to surprise the viewer with a big twist - and it kind of does, even if it doesn't land with the impact it could have. The problem is everything that comes before that moment. The twist has potential, but the first half of the film feels flat and aimless. I wasn't bored because of the pacing, but because of the lack of depth. The characters are cold, one-dimensional, almost like ghosts with no identity. And by the time the script starts to flesh them out, it already feels too late to really care.

🔺 WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD 🔺 Still, the core idea has potential. The film plays with time, introducing two storylines that seem to be happening at the same time... until we realise they're actually set in different periods. One is in the past, the other in the present, and both intersect through a wormhole - a kind of portal that allows characters to travel between different eras. It reminded me of the series Dark, or films like Triangle, Timecrimes, and Coherence. But unlike those examples, Caddo Lake never really builds an immersive or emotional experience. The execution feels safe, with very little visual or conceptual ambition.

🔻 END OF SPOILERS 🔻

The third act clearly needed to be bolder. Once we understand what's really going on, we want the film to take risks and go further, to hit us with a strong, memorable climax. But instead, the ending falls flat - it's not shocking, emotional, or even satisfying. It's like the film builds something and then gives up halfway.

In the end, Caddo Lake is the kind of movie that sparks curiosity and manages to surprise here and there, but never reaches its full potential. If you enjoy non-linear narratives and time-related plots, it might be worth checking out - just keep your expectations low. It's an interesting watch... and that's about it.

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Rule of Jenny Pen (2024)

5/10

So slow

6 April 2025

The Rule of Jenny Pen starts with a premise that, at first glance, promised a dark dive into psychological horror with some supernatural undertones. The idea of a nursing home where a deranged man uses a creepy doll to harm other residents suggested a slow-burning tension, almost like The Taking of Deborah Logan meets Hereditary. But it quickly becomes clear that this isn't the direction the film wants to take.

Instead, what we get is more of a dark drama-thriller, where the real horror doesn't come from a possessed doll, but from loneliness, neglect, and the physical and emotional decline that comes with aging. And honestly, that's where the film is most effective. Not because it's scary in a traditional sense, but because it's quietly unsettling. There's something deeply uncomfortable about the way it presents the fragility of the elderly - their silent routines, empty stares, and lifeless rooms that feel like waiting rooms for death. That, perhaps, is the real "ghost" haunting this story.

Geoffrey Rush and John Lithgow deliver strong performances. You can feel the weight of the years in their expressions and movements, and that's credit to them. They manage to find humanity in the smallest moments, even though their characters are morally opposed.

The pacing, though, is incredibly slow. And I'm someone who usually enjoys a slow burn, especially when it helps build atmosphere and gives space for silence. But here, the slowness works against the film. You spend too much time waiting for something to happen, and when it finally does, it feels rushed and slightly messy - like the director suddenly remembered the movie needed an ending and wrapped things up quickly before the credits rolled. There's a clear sense of imbalance: too much buildup for a climax that doesn't quite land, and several scenes that are never really explained.

That ties into what might be the film's biggest flaw - it was marketed as a horror film, but never fully commits to the genre. It avoids using horror symbolism or embracing its supernatural setup in any meaningful way. It's a shame, because this world could have been explored in a bolder, more disturbing way, perhaps in the vein of Hereditary or The Babadook.

Still, there were moments that hit me emotionally. With elderly relatives of my own in care homes, I couldn't help but wonder: do they feel this same emptiness? Could they be suffering in silence, maybe even because of another resident? Even with its flaws, the film manages to spark that kind of reflection - and that's not nothing.

In the end, The Rule of Jenny Pen isn't a bad piece of work, but it's far from memorable. It probably works better as an existential drama than as a thriller or horror. It's worth watching, sure - as long as you're ready for a very slow pace or in the mood for something that might test your patience.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Parenting (2025)

7/10

Funny

31 March 2025

The Parenting is one of those movies that doesn't take itself seriously for a single second-and that's a good thing. With a tone that reminded me of Scary Movie, it leans into absurd comedy that, despite being completely silly at times, succeeds in its main goal: making us laugh.

The story follows a gay couple who decide to introduce their families to each other during a weekend getaway at a rented house. The only issue? The house is haunted. The film flirts with horror elements, but never with the intention of actually scaring anyone. The focus is entirely on comedy, and a lot of the fun comes from the protagonists' interactions with a homophobic ghost that refuses to leave them alone simply because of who they are. This premise alone leads to some genuinely hilarious moments, especially in how the characters try to navigate the situation.

The humor is completely over-the-top, in the best way. There are absurd situations that caught me off guard and made me laugh out loud, but there are also moments where the exaggeration drags a little. The first half works well because it surprises us, plays with horror clichés, and subverts expectations with unexpected jokes. However, the second half loses some of that initial energy. By then, The Parenting has already played most of its cards, and without many new ideas, it starts to feel repetitive. On top of that, the ending felt rushed, as if they decided to wrap things up in a hurry without much buildup.

Even so, The Parenting has its merits. At a time when these kinds of exaggerated, no-holds-barred comedies seem increasingly rare, it's refreshing to see a film that just wants to entertain without overthinking things. It's not groundbreaking or particularly memorable, but it does its job and delivers a style of humor we don't see as often anymore. If you're a fan of this kind of comedy, it's definitely worth a watch.

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Locked (2025)

5/10

Just okay

25 March 2025

Locked tries to be an intense, claustrophobic survival thriller, but it never quite stands out in the genre. As a fan of these types of films, I appreciate when a simple, single-location premise can be turned into something tense and immersive. But Locked spends way too much time leaning on clichés without bringing anything new or truly engaging in the first half. The pacing drags, the narrative barely moves forward, and the attempts at suspense just don't land.

The second half is definitely an improvement-it picks up the intensity and has moments that actually manage to grab your attention. But even then, it never reaches a level where it feels memorable. The concept has potential, but the execution falls short, failing to dive deep into the psychological dynamics of the main character or create a truly suffocating atmosphere.

Bill Skarsgård, as always, delivers a solid performance, though this is far from his best work. He has the screen presence and charisma to carry a film almost entirely on his own, and he does a good job of selling the frustration and desperation of the situation. But the script doesn't give him much to work with, leaving his character too one-dimensional for his performance to truly shine.

One of the film's most interesting aspects is the car's design, which was adapted to function as the main setting. The way the space is utilized adds to the sense of confinement and gives the experience a layer of realism. That said, Locked could have tapped into something deeper-whether about the economy, modern society, or even humanity's relationship with technology. Instead, it settles for being a middle-of-the-road thriller, entertaining enough but lacking any real impact.

In the end, Locked is fine for a 90-minute distraction, but it's the kind of movie you'll probably forget as soon as the credits roll. It does the job, but it never pushes itself beyond just being "good enough."

10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Interview (II) (2014)

7/10

A good old fashioned comedy

24 March 2025

The Interview is one of those films that, even without being a masterpiece, managed to win me over in a special way. I can't say I loved it, but I really enjoyed its sharp and sarcastic humor, which, for me, surpasses many of today's comedies that often feel forced and unfunny. It's not a film that will stay with me forever, but it has more "guts" and genuine laughs than a lot of productions I see nowadays-going as far as satirizing a dictator and mercilessly humiliating him.

That boldness in the script is what really hooked me. I appreciated how it turns a ridiculous premise into an action comedy filled with absurd yet strangely effective moments. James Franco and Seth Rogen have undeniable chemistry, carrying the film with their over-the-top and sometimes childish dynamic, which works precisely because The Interview never takes itself too seriously. The physical comedy blends with rapid-fire, outrageously exaggerated dialogue, creating a fast-paced rhythm that keeps the film entertaining from start to finish.

It's a fun cinematic experience, even if, in some ways, not a particularly memorable one. It does what it sets out to do: entertain, deliver laughs, and spark a bit of thought-without overcomplicating things or trying too hard. It's one of those films I probably won't revisit anytime soon, but in the moment, it definitely managed to entertain me.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Borderline (I) (2025)

4/10

Not for me

16 March 2025

I love Samara Weaving, and I'm happy to see Alba Baptista gaining space in an international production, but not even that saved Borderline from being a frustrating experience. For 90 minutes, all I could think was: "what the hell is this?"

The film tries to be an eccentric thriller with touches of dark humor, but it completely fails to balance the genres. There's no tension, no coherence, not even a solid script. It's a mess of scenes crashing into each other, as if the story is always on the verge of making sense but then refuses to follow a logical path.

The biggest problem is this lack of focus. Borderline seems to want to be everything at once but never commits to anything. Some moments suggest an intense thriller, while others try to lean into absurd comedy, but nothing really works. The humor falls flat because it lacks timing and impact, and the suspense never actually builds up, making it hard to feel engaged in the story. When it finally seems to find its direction, it quickly loses itself again, as if it's afraid of taking itself too seriously.

That said, I can't deny that Samara Weaving and Ray Nicholson carry the film on their backs. She continues to showcase impressive versatility in her roles, and he delivers a fantastic performance that makes me believe he'll become a major force in the industry in the coming years.

Another positive is the soundtrack, which, while not enough to save the film, adds a few moments of atmosphere. But overall, Borderline is an experience that won't appeal to everyone. It had all the ingredients to be a fun and unpredictable thriller, but instead, it's an exercise in patience, kind of stupid and never quite sure of what it wants to be.

43 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Mickey 17 (2025)

6/10

Mickey 17

13 March 2025

I went into Mickey 17 with high expectations. Bong Joon-ho gave us Parasite, a masterpiece that had me glued to the screen, so I was hoping for something of the same caliber. And while I did enjoy the film, I left the cinema feeling like something was missing, as if the story didn't go as far as it could have.

The social commentary is there, and it's one of the film's strongest aspects. The idea that we are disposable, replaceable, just cogs in a system that exploits us to exhaustion without any regard for individuality, is unsettling-because we already live in a society that operates this way. Then there's the theme of neocolonization, which the film explores in a sharp way: if we ever discover a new, inhabited planet, we'll probably behave just as cruelly and disgracefully as we did centuries ago during the Age of Exploration, because, let's be honest, it's in the DNA of too many of us to be unscrupulous bastards.

However, Mickey 17 struggles with an inconsistent tone. It feels torn between being an existential sci-fi film and a comedy, but it never quite finds the right balance. Some of the humor works, but other times it completely undermines the impact of the film's deeper ideas.

And then there are the villains. Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette are fantastic actors, but their characters here are so cartoonish that they lose any sense of menace. Instead of being intimidating or manipulative figures of power, they just come across as ridiculous. This weakens the narrative, turning the central conflict into a joke and stripping away the potential for a much stronger ideological clash.

That being said, there are things to appreciate. Robert Pattinson continues to make bold choices, and his performance effectively conveys the character's existential crisis. Visually, the film is also captivating, with production design that creates an authentic sense of a dystopian reality within a spaceship setting.

In the end, Mickey 17 isn't a bad film, but it falls short of what it could have been. The ideas are there, the social critique is relevant, but the execution falters in key moments. Is it worth watching? Yes, especially for the thought-provoking themes. But anyone expecting something on the level of Parasite might walk away feeling a little disappointed.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy (2025)

7/10

A Bittersweet but Worthy Return

11 March 2025

I won't lie, I approached this new Bridget Jones chapter with a mix of excitement and apprehension. On one hand, I was eager to see her again, to find out how life had treated her after all the ups and downs. On the other, I was afraid this sequel might not have the heart of the previous films. Fortunately, Mad About the Boy managed to move me.

The biggest shock comes right at the beginning: Colin Firth's character is gone. I won't deny it upset me. After three films of watching Mark and Bridget fight for their love, he dies, and it almost feels like everything was for nothing. It was hard to accept. But as the story unfolded, I realized this narrative choice allowed for a different, and in a way, brave approach. Life doesn't stop, and just like us, Bridget had to move forward.

This film is more melancholic than the previous ones. It still has the signature humo, the awkward moments and Renée Zellweger's unique charm, but now, the weight of time is more present. There's something bittersweet about watching Bridget navigate this new stage of life. It made me reflect on how time flies, how life can take unexpected turns, and how important it is to cherish people and moments while we have them. It's rare for a romantic comedy to make me think this much.

It's not a perfect film. It doesn't quite match the original, and some comedic situations now feel a bit repetitive. But overall, it remains entertaining and true to Bridget Jones' essence, she is still one of the most genuine characters in the genre. And honestly, revisiting this universe and seeing familiar faces again felt comforting.

Mad About the Boy isn't just a story about love and new beginnings, it's also about acceptance and growth. And in the end, despite everything, I felt like Bridget was going to be okay. And that, to me, made it all worth it.

1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Heart Eyes (2025)

8/10

A funny mix between horror, comedy and romance

5 March 2025

Romantic comedy and horror rarely blend well, but Heart Eyes surprisingly finds an effective balance. The film takes an unusual premise: a serial killer who targets couples starts stalking two coworkers, convinced they are romantically involved. This quirky idea works because it doesn't take itself too seriously, keeping a light and fun tone while still maintaining some classic slasher elements.

If you're expecting intense horror, this isn't the right film. Heart Eyes has violence, but it's not the kind of slasher drenched in gore. Blood is present, but aside from two standout scenes, it's never excessive, making it accessible even for those who aren't horror fans. The focus is more on comedy and romance than on scares. That can be a positive or a negative, depending on expectations-those looking for tension and genuine horror might feel the film doesn't go far enough, but anyone after something more laid-back will find it a great source of entertainment.

The film's biggest strength is its cast. Olivia Holt and Mason Gooding have great chemistry, which makes the romance believable and enhances the comedy. Their interactions feel natural, and they sell the idea that they're figuring out their feelings for each other while trying to survive a serial killer.

On the other hand, the mystery around the villain isn't particularly strong. The film doesn't put much effort into building suspense about the killer's identity, and when the reveal comes, it's not exactly shocking. However, it works as a subtle and amusing satire of whodunnit horror films, especially in how these movies tend to handle the big villain reveal.

The humor fits the film's tone well. There aren't any particularly clever or groundbreaking jokes, but Heart Eyes knows what it is and sticks to a laid-back style without trying too hard. It's the kind of humor that works well for a casual movie night.

Overall, it's definitely worth watching-as long as you know what to expect. Heart Eyes isn't a hardcore horror film or a traditional rom-com; it sits comfortably in between. It's a lighthearted slasher, perfect for those looking for something fun without diving into full-on horror. Even for those who don't usually enjoy horror movies, this could be a great pick for a date night or a fun watch with friends. In the end, it does exactly what it sets out to do: entertain.

0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Handmaiden (2016)

8/10

A Masterfully Twisted Tale of Desire and Manipulation

2 March 2025

The Handmaiden is one of those films that pulls you into a web of deception, desire, and betrayal, constantly playing with expectations. Visually stunning, it showcases impressive cinematography, costume design, and sound editing, all of which enhance the immersion. Every detail seems meticulously crafted, making it a high-quality production from start to finish.

Even though I really enjoyed the film, there were moments when I felt disconnected. Maybe it was the narrative structure, which demands patience and full attention, or the fact that some scenes felt longer than necessary. Still, the unexpected twists completely changed my perception of the story, keeping me engaged. It's a film that masterfully deceives the audience, forcing us to rethink everything we thought we knew.

It can be considered an erotic thriller, not just because of its sex scenes but because of how the characters' sexuality is woven into the narrative and their power dynamics. Each intimate scene serves a purpose in developing the story and reinforcing its social commentary. The film is unafraid to explore desire and power in a raw yet beautiful way, which is why I believe an American remake would never work. Hollywood, increasingly hesitant about portraying sex and nudity, obsessed with sanitizing everything, wouldn't be able to capture this film's boldness and essence.

Beyond its aesthetics and eroticism, the film also offers an interesting critique of sexism and how women are often treated as mere objects in a world dominated by men and their darkest fantasies.

The Handmaiden is a unique experience-a mix of mystery, thriller, and romance with a touch of sensuality. Some moments tested my patience, but it still surprised me in many ways. In the end, it left a mark on me. It's a film that dares to break conventions and is definitely worth recommending.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Lion King (1994)

8/10

A Timeless Classic That Still Holds Its Magic

1 March 2025

Rewatching The Lion King reminds me why this is one of Disney's best animated films. It has everything: a story that truly resonates, an incredible soundtrack, unforgettable characters, meaningful life lessons, and most importantly, a soul that is missing from most modern Disney movies.

The Portuguese dub is one of the film's biggest highlights. André Maia and José Raposo shine as Timon and Pumbaa, bringing contagious energy and humor that works perfectly. Their performances are so good that I actually gave up watching the original version just to enjoy the Portuguese dubbing instead.

And then there's the breathtaking soundtrack, with Circle of Life and Can You Feel the Love Tonight standing out. But what truly elevates the experience is Hans Zimmer's score, giving the film an epic and emotional weight that few animated movies can achieve. The songs aren't just there to fill space; they are an integral part of the story, adding depth to the characters and making the scenes even more immersive.

Visually, the film is enchanting. Every scene is crafted with incredible attention to detail and a unique magic that makes this world so captivating. There's a handcrafted charm in how everything was drawn and animated-something no modern 3D animation can replicate.

Even though I love The Lion King, it's not a perfect film. Some moments could have been developed better, and the ending feels slightly rushed. But that doesn't take away its brilliance. It's a timeless story about growth, loss, and redemption, told with emotion, humor, and an atmosphere that simply doesn't exist in Disney's current productions.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Caveat (2020)

6/10

A Haunting Slow Burn with an Unsettling Atmosphere

23 February 2025

Caveat is one of those films that leaves you thinking but is also hard to describe. It's set in the same universe as Oddity, a film I loved, and it shares that same eerie, bizarre atmosphere that pulls you in from start to finish. The setting is one of the film's strongest points-the house where the story unfolds is downright horrifying, to the point where I kept wondering who could possibly live there. The film's aesthetics and production design add a lot to the discomfort, making it visually striking.

The pacing is slow, which might turn some viewers off. This isn't a horror film for everyone-it's made for those who enjoy slow burns, where the tension builds gradually rather than relying on cheap scares. Despite its slow and minimal action, it managed to keep me engaged, even though it never truly became unforgettable. There are some well-executed tense moments and a couple of genuinely chilling scenes-two brief moments, just a few seconds long, actually gave me chills.

My biggest issue with Caveat is the final act. After an intriguing buildup, I was expecting something more intense, something truly terrifying. Instead, the ending felt underwhelming, far from the madness that seemed to be brewing throughout the story. It left me with mixed feelings, as I was hoping for a more powerful conclusion.

Another aspect that intrigued me was how difficult it was to pinpoint the film's time period. At times, it felt like a story set in the '70s or '80s, but other scenes made it seem more modern. This ambiguity, rather than being a flaw, actually adds to the film's unsettling and surreal nature.

I really enjoyed the cast, who deliver odd, almost unsettling performances that fit perfectly within the film's bizarre tone. Caveat is, overall, an intriguing experience. It's not a perfect film, and it didn't leave a lasting impact on me, but for those who appreciate indie horror with a strange and atmospheric approach, it's worth checking out.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Monkey (2025)

6/10

A Bizarre but Entertaining Ride

22 February 2025

I found the first part of The Monkey to be very good and captivating, instantly grabbing my interest from the moment it started with an intriguing mix of bizarre situations and peculiar humor, all wrapped in a narrative that flows calmly and engagingly during the first 30 minutes. This introduction, which shows the protagonist's childhood as he deals with the mysterious monkey doll, completely hooked me, creating high expectations for what was to come.

However, the film lost some of its focus when the action shifted to the present day. The transition between the two timelines wasn't as smooth as it could have been, and I felt that the story's development was lacking in some moments. For example, the origin of the monkey is never explored. Additionally, the plot twists, while potentially interesting, felt rushed, and the director didn't manage to use suspense effectively. All the deaths are graphic, but there's no buildup of suspense like we see with the accidents in the Final Destination series.

The Monkey still manages to entertain and stand out a bit from other titles in the genre. The film has a unique atmosphere, and the gore elements are simultaneously repulsive and hilarious, a combination that left me both disgusted and laughing. This balance between horror and comedy is one of the film's strengths, and it makes me think that this could have been a sort of "teaser" for the highly anticipated Final Destination 6.

In the end, it's a work that, while not groundbreaking or particularly memorable, offers a different and somewhat fun experience. It's far from being a perfect film, but it has its charm and moments that are worth watching.

0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Captain America: Brave New World (2025)

6/10

More filler than thriller

17 February 2025

I watched Captain America: Brave New World without high expectations. I felt that the movie isn't as bad as some critics suggest, but it's also not great. It's just another chapter in the Marvel Cinematic Universe that seems to exist only to fill the release schedule without adding anything truly meaningful to the overall story.

I saw it in 4DX, and honestly, the experience was intense. The special effects and moving seats had me almost jumping out of my chair during some action scenes. It was fun, and I'd love to try it again with a horror movie, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone who gets motion sickness easily.

As for the movie itself, it's entertaining, with plenty of action to keep your eyes busy and hold your attention for two hours. However, the big problem is that nothing impactful happens-there's no real weight to the events, and it doesn't feel like it matters much for the future of the MCU. Another issue is how Sam Wilson is developed as Captain America. He's still pretty much the same Falcon we've seen in previous films, just with a shield and a suit in U. S. flag colors. There's no real dramatic weight to his transformation, nor an arc that makes us feel he has truly embraced the legacy. This makes the movie less compelling than it could have been.

The villain doesn't help either. Red Hulk, who had the potential to be an intimidating opponent, ends up feeling weak and forgettable. A superhero movie, especially in the MCU, needs a strong, charismatic villain, but this one lacks any real presence. There's also another villain, but they never become truly impressive or threatening.

Captain America: Brave New World does its job as a distraction, but it's not a film that will leave a lasting impact. Honestly, I'll probably forget about it soon. If you're a Marvel fan, it's worth watching to pass the time, but don't expect anything special.

1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Bridget Jones's Baby (2016)

7/10

A Lighthearted Return for Bridget Jones Fans

9 February 2025

I enjoyed Bridget Jones's Baby. It was more interesting and fun than the second film, The Edge of Reason, but it still falls slightly short of the original, Bridget Jones's Diary. The premise of the love triangle, with Bridget trying to figure out the identity of her baby's father while the two men compete for her affection, is engaging and brings a fresh dynamic to the story. Bridget's misadventures, as always, are a hilarious mix of disasters and relatable moments that keep the spirit of the character alive, which is what won over fans in the first place.

That said, there are a few aspects worth mentioning. Renée Zellweger, who has always been the heart of this franchise, looks a bit different in this film, likely due to plastic surgery. At times, she doesn't even seem like the same person from the earlier movies, which felt a bit strange. Still, her performance remains solid, and she manages to bring back the vulnerability and humor that make Bridget so endearing. It's like reuniting with an old friend who's changed her appearance but still has the same essence that makes her special.

The film is entertaining and has its charm, especially for fans of the series. The chemistry between Renée, Colin Firth (Mark Darcy), and Patrick Dempsey (Jack Qwant) works well, and there are scenes that deliver good laughs. Adding to these characters is Sarah Solemani as Miranda, Bridget's new friend, who brings so much charisma that she could easily carry her own spin-off movie. However, despite being an enjoyable experience, Bridget Jones's Baby ends up being a bit forgettable. It lacks that special something that made the first film so memorable. It's like a comforting meal that satisfies in the moment but doesn't leave a lasting impression.

Overall, it's a sequel worth watching, especially for those who've followed Bridget's journey from the beginning. It's not a masterpiece, but it's a fun romantic comedy that does its job.

2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Companion (2025)

8/10

A Smart and Thrilling Take on AI and Humanity

9 February 2025

Honestly, I didn't expect Companion to be such a pleasant surprise. The premise of the film can be seen as a creative inversion of The Terminator (1984), but with a modern and innovative approach that focuses on fundamental questions about artificial intelligence and consciousness.

The fast-paced nature of the movie kept me fully engaged, while the smart twists add layers of complexity to the story. The relationship between humans and machines is explored in depth, raising intriguing questions about free will, emotions, and the future of the technologies we create.

One of the biggest highlights is Sophie Thatcher's performance, which brings essential emotional depth to the plot and humanity to her robotic character, making it a central point in the discussions raised by the film.

In the end, Companion proves to be a film that not only entertains but also challenges the viewer to think about the impact of our creations on the future of humanity.

0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason (2004)

7/10

Not as Good as the Original, but Still Entertaining

6 February 2025

Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason doesn't quite reach the same level as the original, but that doesn't mean it's a bad film. In fact, it's still enjoyable and has its moments. However, it lacks a slightly stronger and more developed narrative, something that could have elevated the story beyond what we'd already seen in the first film.

The sequel keeps many of the elements that made the original a success: Bridget Jones's quirky humor and endearing vulnerability, as well as the chemistry between Renée Zellweger, Colin Firth, and Hugh Grant. The trio of actors are perfect and iconic in their roles.

That said, the film falls short by repeating many of the original's formulas without adding anything truly new. The narrative ends up feeling a bit stretched, with situations that sometimes seem forced just to extend the comedy or drama. Some scenes, like the prison sequence in Thailand, are fun and visually striking, but at times, the drama around the love triangle becomes exhausting, as we already know how it will play out.

Even so, this second chapter has moments that are worth watching. The interactions between Bridget and Mark Darcy remain captivating, and there are scenes that deliver good laughs. The soundtrack, just like in the first film, is a highlight, with songs that complement the story's tone and add an extra dose of nostalgia.

Overall, Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason is a sequel that, while not surpassing the original, still manages to entertain. It's a film that fans of Bridget Jones will appreciate, even if it doesn't become as memorable as the first. For those who enjoy lighthearted and fun romantic comedies, it's worth giving a chance.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

pedroquintaoo

Reviews

Tell Your Friends

Recently Viewed