2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Very true to the book, but more suggestive eye acting required
10 March 2017
Not sure what all the fuss was about in terms of sexual content with this first of the trilogy movies: you see more sex in one episode of the television show 'Shameless'. There was very good casting with some of the actors: Max Martini as Taylor (looking forward to seeing more of him in the second film), and Eloise Mumford as Ana's best friend Kate (beautiful as well as an excellent actress, although her part in the film was smaller than in the book). The film is limited as to what can be achieved in 2 hours: There was so much more content in the book than in the film. And there lies the challenge. I think the scriptwriters could have done a better job to include more dialogue to clarify: how Ana's parents reacted to Christian (as well as Christian's parents to Ana), and how upset Ana became as the story progressed, as she was subjected to matters with which she lacked understanding. They didn't convey how Kate was aware that Christian was making Ana "cry all the time now" as she dealt with her feelings of confusion, and was very protective of her friend. There could have been many more meaningful glances from Christian to show how totally enraptured he is with Ana, how this attraction is supposed to grow throughout the story, and his constant inner battles that she must be too naive for him to initiate into this 'lifestyle' so he should leave her alone. Still, the locations and sets were spot on, the content which was included was very true to the book, and overall the director did a good job to capture this budding 'romance'.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
3 hours long? There should have been an Editor
9 September 2016
I wish IMDb.com allowed "Likes" and "Comments" the way social media allows these days. Although there were some beautiful scenes, most of the outdoor shots were stunning (I'd love to know where it was all shot, as it seems to be an idyllic land to visit), and the lead actors are all gorgeous and obviously very talented -- these riches were all just wasted on this much-too-long film. Kudos to the Casting Director, those two lead actresses could definitely pass for sisters with their mesmerizing blue eyes, and the "Schiller" character was played by a very hunky and charming actor. I didn't really need to write a movie review, because the review posted by "Trivial Tapestry" says it all. As did all the other user reviewers who agreed that "Beloved Sisters" was simply boring overall with a practically non-existent musical score.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed