Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Great Performances: Heartbreak House (1985)
Season Unknown, Episode Unknown
9/10
Excellent
28 July 2005
I managed to find this very rare video from a Canadian seller, and spent more money than I could spare to get it. For the most part, I was glad I did. As a Shaw fan, I was thrilled to get to see one of his lesser known works performed by a top-notch cast.

Rex Harrison was in rare form as Captain Shotover, playing well not only with Amy Irving (in her Broadway debut as Ellie Dunn) but with the formidable Rosemary Harry as the airy, yet surprisingly complex Hesione Hushabye. Harrison captured not only the humor, but the pathos of this man who has seen better years and still has the gumption to grasp at happiness in the face of a world quite madder than he himself has become. Theatrical diva Rosemary Harris is brilliant as Hesione, grand and sweeping like a flock of butterflies, yet still a strong enough character to anchor the play. She is the glue that holds the family together, and she is as warm and sensual as her sister Ariadne (Dana Ivey) is cold and manipulative. Even so, in her own unconventional way, she can be as manipulative as her sister when she wants to be.

Dana Ivey, who garnered one of her two Tony nominations in 1984 for her work in this play, was cast somewhat against type as man-killer Ariadne Utterwood. She pulled off the haughty, shallow, angry character quite well, managing a sort of frigid sexuality that drives her suitors to distraction. But she's Ivey through and through, and there's more bite than nibble to this siren.

That being said, no one in the cast could stand against the utter domination of Harris' and Harrison's bravura performances. Difficult to find, but Heartbreak House is definitely worth the search for serious theater fans.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Easy Street (1986–1987)
It's like living with Noel Coward.
19 June 2005
This show experienced a short renaissance on Lifetime Television Network in the early 90s. The writing was, for the most part, good (and in some cases, downright smashing). Unfortunately, a lot of expectations were riding on Loni Anderson's ability to score a hit after leaving WKRP in Cincinnati (this was her first series after that show). And when the show failed to deliver the numbers that were expected (due in part, I think, to poor scheduling and inadequate promotion by the network), the show went into a rapid downward spiral. Which is a pity, because Anderson gathered perhaps one of the finest casts imaginable for this show. Broadway actress Dana Ivey and future-Oscar-nominee James Cromwell shone as the rich in-laws who are constantly trying to oust Anderson's character from their midst. Ivey and Cromwell wrung every bit of comic juice from the material, with Ivey stealing (characteristically) pretty much every scene she was in. Unfortunately, the show was canceled before it could hit its stride, and the actors went on to greener pastures. I think, if it had been given a chance, it could have been a hit.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nola (2003)
3/10
Into Every Actresses Life, A Lifetime Original Movie Must Come
7 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I am a huge fan of actress Mary McDonnell, which is the only reason I sat through the entire excruciating run of "Nola." And even an actress of McDonnell's considerable skills couldn't save this movie from itself.

To put it bluntly, the movie didn't want to admit it was a dumb "Kansas Girl Takes The Big Apple By Storm" flick, so it tossed in a few nuggets of controversy (transgenderism, age-play/BDSM, legalizing prostitution) to try to give it depth. Unfortunately, it didn't cover any of these topics with either depth or sensitivity, turning the entire script into something that more resembled a Talking-Points List for the extreme left than an actual story.

Nola herself was the only reasonably developed character, and I didn't like her. Mary McDonnell's character (the ex-hooker with a heart of gold, if you can believe it!) hinted at a background that might have been interesting, but there was no follow through. The other characters were one-dimensional and forgettable.

The plot twists, as they were, were formulaic and actually embarrassing at a couple of points, and the resolution of the film was just rushed and wrong.

As for me? I'm just going to put in a copy of "Sneakers" or "Dances with Wolves," or maybe watch a few episodes of "Battlestar Galactica," just so I can clear my mind of Mary McDonnell spitting out this dreck dialogue. Love ya, Mary. You're better than this.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting Film
22 March 2005
Okay, cult ties or not, this was an interesting film. It offers up a variety of ideas and leaves it to the viewer to decide whether or not to believe. Visually, it was a beautiful film with great art direction and special effects. Marlee Matlin was effective in the main role, although I thought the "story" detracted from the documentary portion of the film.

As to the film's ties to cults--I didn't see anything coercive or subversive in the film. After viewing it, I'm not ready to sell my soul to some guru. OTOH, I do find myself thinking more about the thoughts I have, and the effect they have on my spirit and body. Moral of the story--take out what you will, and don't join a cult. Duh.
35 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed