That Fatal Sneeze (1907) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not that great.
JoeytheBrit15 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This early Hepworth film is fairly humorous but it carries on for far too long and drags in the middle because of the repetitious nature of its scenes. An old man plays a trick on a youngster with pepper causing the boy to sneeze uncontrollably. The boy, who, it has to be said, appears ever so slightly effeminate (and might have been played by a girl), gets his own back by peppering the old man's hairbrush, handkerchief, hat, etc while he sleeps. In the morning the old man's sneezes are so powerful that things in their path collapse and fall apart or fall off walls, etc. The sneezes keep on building until they create an earthquake and then cause the old boy to explode.

The last minute or so of the film is probably the most effective. Where a filmmaker today would use a shaking motion of the camera to transmit an earthquake, the cameraman here rocks the camera back and forth, eventually slowing down to signify the passing of the quake while the old boy hangs on to a lamppost. It's still quite an effective little trick. Overall though, the film went on far too long for what is essentially a one-shot joke.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Step In The Editing Evolution
springfieldrental13 December 2020
Invisible wires were the go-to special effects technique back in 1907 as the British short comedy "That Fatal Sneeze" proves by using with great frequency. Director Lewin Fitzhamon, the creator of the first dog and animal hero in movies, 1905's "Rescued By Rover," builds up this "avenge" plot with increasing intensity as each sneeze produces more people chasing the sneezer. Another unique feature is Fitzhamon places his camera on a rocking board to "sway" the earth towards the end, as well as using a Melies' trick of stopping the camera--and replacing the sneezer with a screen of smoke. Lastly, Fitzhamon's tight editing with each sequence highlighting a comedy skit is quicker and crisper than previous "chase" films. Fatal Sneeze is truly a huge leap in the evolution towards today's cinematic aesthetics .
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hilarious, and that is what counts.
reptilicus22 October 2003
Early special effects film that borrows a lot from Georges Melies and uses gags that comedians like the Marx Brothers and Laurel and Hardy were still finding worthwhile 30 years later. At dinner an elderly man laces the food of a young boy with pepper, unleashing a barrage of sneezes which the old fellow finds quite funny. That night the boy enters the old man's room and puts a large supply of pepper on his handkerchief, in his hat, and other places and just waits for morning. (I sure hope this pair is just uncle and nephew. I would hate to think father and son played such pranks on each other. Then again maybe I should repeat to myself "It's just a show, you should really just relax.") The next day the man discovers he is plagued with uncontrollable sneezes which turn out to be very destructive! One good "ah-choo" destroys a storefront, another blows a woman's hair off, another causes a mild earthquake (accomplished by rocking the camera back and forth) and so on. It is not long before an angry crowd of merchants and passers-by are chasing the man. Meanwhile the boy follows closely waving the pepper shaker and having the time of his life. How does it end? Take the title literally! If you want to see other comics milking sneeze gags just watch the Marx Brothers in AT THE CIRCUS (1939) when Harpo's sneeze demolishes the inside of a caravan. Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy explored the dangers of uncontrolled sneezes in some of their 2-reelers as well. This is a great example of early special effects and comedy and almost a century later it is still hilarious.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
an outstanding short film from the period in which it was made.
stormin_player5 February 2007
Since the beginning of motion picture, by the Lumière brothers in 1985, for the next decade forward films where made which where there to attract an audience, like theatre. Theses films did not have anything in the way of acting or composition but where simply there to show an artistic view to the motion picture. Almost like Photography.

But this film in 1907 was one of many such as 'The Impossible Voyage' in 1904 and 'king lea' in 1910, to show a narrative which was not like theatre but more on the way of we are intruding into someone Else's life. This was the beginning of how films are seen today.

Due to this films quirky camera shots and over flamboyant acting, i give this a smashing 9 out of ten. A true film from the beginning of movie making.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not given the credit it deserves!
cmmchale224 March 2003
Granted, this is not profound, earth-shattering filmmaking of the sort to change lives and open minds. It's still fun, imaginative in a way that--so early in film history--had the flavor of unknown possibilities. Now that we know we can do anything via computer graphics, there's so little joy in trick photography and special effects via rigged props. Its strength is its rough edges; this is film in evolution. And the way they chose to end this film is nothing short of priceless.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very Good Camera Effects, Very Silly Story
Snow Leopard17 May 2004
This is an interesting combination of some very good camera effects and a very silly story. Overall, it's still worth seeing, even as long ago as it was filmed. The premise is no flimsier than those used for a lot of full-length features in more recent times, and the camera work holds up quite well.

The simple story starts with an older man and a youth (apparently relatives of some kind) playing practical jokes on each other with pepper, and soon things get out of hand, with some outlandish results. It's thoroughly goofy, but because the camera effects are done well, it works well enough to be entertaining much of the time. It does go on a bit too long, and would probably have been better if they had not drawn it out quite so long before wrapping things up.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Majorly cool--and one of the few early films that is well worth seeing today
planktonrules14 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Aside from LE VOYAGE DANS LE LUNE and a few other films by Georges Méliès, this is about the most entertaining and funny films I have seen from the very early days of cinema. In fact, I think it's a lot funnier than most of Chaplin's early shorts--it's that good.

A jerk pours sneezing powder all over an unsuspecting old guys things while he's sleeping. The old guy later wakes up and pretty soon he starts to sneeze uncontrollably. The sight gags, for 1907, are great--as beds and walls and EVERYTHING get blown about by his sneezes. He even later causes earthquakes with the sneezes. This builds and builds until ultimately he just explodes!!! This is such a cool movie--one kids should especially enjoy!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!! ASTONISHING THING AT THE VERY BEGINNING
johnharrodyuan18 January 2022
When you watch this movie, you should consider it as something made in 1907, the one reel era of cinema. And this film is truly using the technology of film to the maximum. The way to create the feeling of shaking by shaking camera is truly amazing idea and the editing is still compilable by all the filmmaker nowadays.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth seeing because as well as having value as part of cinematic history in the UK, it is also genuinely quite amusing
bob the moo6 May 2007
An elderly man plagues a small boy by putting pepper all over his food and making him sneeze uncontrollably. Later that night when the man is asleep the boy sneaks into his room and puts pepper all over his clothes and possessions. The next morning sees the man unable to stop sneezing but it is not the frequency of the sneezing that is the real problem but rather the power.

Firstly you really need to try and ignore the performance of the young boy in this film because he is awful; and not by modern standards but by the standards of those around him as well. His fist waving at the dinner table is so unconvincing that I was laughing before the jokes started coming. Outside of this though (and he keeps mincing along in each scene) the film is actually pretty amusing and is a very good example of early special effects humour and the destructive sneeze gag that others continued to use afterwards. The various scenes of things falling apart are amusing and mostly very well done even if some are better than others. The final shot is a simple cut but it was delivered very sharply, well edited and in time with the music and it worked really well.

Worth seeing then because as well as having value as part of cinematic history in the UK, it is also genuinely quite amusing.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For one joke it's a bit too long, but not bad
Tornado_Sam23 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This Hepworth film does go on for a bit too long, and for a one-gag film it is stretched out a bit, but considering its time I'll still give it a 7-star rating. The story is simple but the effects and camera work which come on later look good even today.

An uncle and his nephew are having dinner when the uncle starts thinking it would be funny to get his nephew to sneeze. So he throws some pepper at him and it works! The boy is so mad he lets the uncle have it bad. He puts pepper in his uncle's clothes in his bedroom and then the fun starts. The guy goes around town sneezing, and it soon becomes pretty harmful--he knocks a lamp post over, blows a woman's hair off her head, etc. And his last sneeze *is* fatal--it makes him explode!

The film is silly and works very well even by today's standards. Yeah, the joke isn't very funny and seems outdated--but the way it is used makes this film very unique. There is also some ground-breaking camerawork used when the uncle causes an earthquake with his sneezes, and the camera rocks back and forth. This is something I've never seen before in early cinema and it works well.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed