The Independence of Romania (1912) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Epic Film Shows War From A Distance
springfieldrental15 April 2021
The first feature film produced in Romania, and arguably the first international movie clocking in over two hours (even though only 83 minutes remain today) was September 1912's "The Independence of Romania."

The production was an adventure in movie-making in the extreme. An actor Aristide Demetriade, took the director's reign while the young Grigore Brezeanu was really the brains behind the operation, who became instrumental in getting financing from a private investor. Meanwhile, the production team received as much resources from the Romanian government and military as they needed. It helped that the ruler of the Romania, King Carlos I, who had fought in the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878, received star billing as himself, even though it was 30 years after the war.

"The Independence of Romania" is really a collection of vignettes strung chronologically, from civilians dancing in the street to soldiers battling oi the fields. It has essentially no plot, but the event of Romania and the Balkan countries overthrowing 500 years of Ottoman and Turkish rule was such a big deal that the meandering film didn't bother the Romanian audience viewing the sprawling epic for the first time. As one observer noted, the movie appears to be a documentary filmed during that war, with wide shots dominating the action. Of course, there wasn't any filmmaking back then.

The production of "The Independence of Romania" was so fraught with difficulties the stories emerging from the efforts of those filmmakers became legendary. The 2007 film, "The Rest Is Silence," Romania's entry into the 2009 Oscars, dramatizes the making of the 1912 film and its trials and tribulations, all done in a humorous vein.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
First Romanian Film Ever !!!
rosdesobolani2 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film, "Razboiul Independentei" is the first Romanian film ever produced, inspired by the war, between Romania and The Otoman Empire. It is known in Universal History as the Russian-Romanian-Turk war and lasted one winter between 1877 and 1878. The DIrector was hired as the only man capable of such an performance after studying film art beyond borders. He made a terrific job, and it is today recognized as the "Father" of all Romanian directors. The Movie includes an very interesting scene, where the main Romanian attack against the Turkish army is led by the Romanian King (Carol I). It is interesting to know, that after studying many actors the director (Aristide) decided to use the real Romanian King (same Carol I, 30 years older) in order for the movie to be more realistic. Also a very important piece of document for the Romanian film history!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Independence of Romania review
JoeytheBrit23 June 2020
For a film made in 1911, this chronicle of the 1877 war of Romania and Russia against the Turkish which led to Romania's independence is crude and primitive; but for a film from a country with little film history at the time, it is a monumental achievement. It plays more like a newsreel or documentary than an historical drama, and the filmmakers have little to no knowledge of the concept of editing (if they did, the film would only have been one-third its current length). Of historical importance to Romanian cinema, but of little worth otherwise.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great film with many mysteries solved
bansaraba17 August 2007
An amazing film for that era... This was the first feature film to last 2 hours (from which about 20 minutes are lost).

Ionut Niculescu and Tudor Caranfil discovered in 1985 the movie's scenario, begun by Petre Liciu and continued by Aristide Demetriade and Constantin Nottara. This led to the establishment of the real director: Aristide Demetriade, not Grigore Brezeanu, as thought before. Brezeanu, along with Leon Popescu were producers.

Carol I was not present in the film (although the Royal House gave a sum of money for the production) except for the final parade which was set not in 1877/78, but in 1912 (actually a cut from a news reel, like a "30 years later..."). In the movie he was impersonated by Aristide Demetriade, the director himself. The critics emphasized the merit of make-up artist Pepi Machauer (who also played czar Alexander).

Also, this was not the first Romanian film ever. Previous titles are:

Papusa (The Doll), a theater play, 1911 Amor fatal (Fatal Love), a theatre play, 1911 Insir'te, margarite!, a fairy tale, 1911/2

More info from wikipedia (with some minor corrections):

In December 1911, the theatrical magazine Rampa published a note under the heading The Cinema in the Theatre (signed by V. Scânteie) indicating that "The Maestro Nottara is in the course of making a patriotic work re-creating the Romanian War of Independence on film, so that today's generations might learn the story of the battles of 1877, and for future generations a live tableau of Romanian bravery will remain".

As a result, the director of the Bucharest branch of the Gaumont-Paris studio, Raymond Pellerin, announced the premiere of his film Războiul din 1877-1878 (The 1877-1878 War), scheduled for 29 December 1911. A "film" made in haste, with a troupe of second-hand actors and with the help of General Constantinescu, who commanded a division at Piteşti, from whom he had obtained the extras needed for the war scenes, "Războiul din 1877-1878" was screened a day before by the prefect of the capital's police, who decided that it did not correspond with historic fact. Consequently, the film was confiscated and destroyed, Raymond Pellerin was declared persona non grata and he left for Paris, while the "collaborationist" general saw himself moved to another garrison as a means of discipline.

On 5 May 1912, the magazine Flacăra (The Flame) brought to its readers' attention the fact that "as it is known, a few artists have founded a society with the goal of producing a film about the War of Independence... Such an undertaking deserves to be applauded". The initiators were a group of actors: C. Nottara, Aristide Demetriade, V. Toneanu, Iancu Brezeanu, N. Soreanu, P. Liciu, as well as the young Grigore Brezeanu, associate producer and the creative force behind the whole operation. Since a large amount of money was needed for the production, they also brought into this effort Leon Popescu, a wealthy man and owner of the Lyric Theatre. The group received strong backing from government authorities, with the army and all necessary equipment being placed at its disposal, plus military advisers (possibly including Pascal Vidraşcu). The camera and its operator was brought from abroad, and the print was prepared in Parisian laboratories. Could Grigore Brezeanu have been the film's director? No source from that time gives credence to such a hypothesis. On the contrary, they present him as "initiator", producer of the film, beside members of the National Theatre and Leon Popescu. Furthermore, it appears that it was he who attracted the financier of the entire undertaking. In 1985, the film critic Tudor Caranfil discovered among Aristide Demetriade's papers his director's notebooks for Independenţa României, unequivocally confirming that he was the film's director. Thus, the film's production crew was as follows: Producers: Leon Popescu, Aristide Demetriade, Vasile Toneanu, Nicolae Soreanu, Petre Liciu, Grigore Brezeanu, Constantin Nottara, Pascal Vidraşcu. Screenwriters: Petre Liciu, Constantin Nottara and Aristide Demetriade. Director: Aristide Demetriade. Cinematographer: Franck Daniau. Makeup and hairstylist: Pepi Machauer.

On 1 September 1912, at the Eforie cinema, the largest movie theater in Bucharest, the premiere of Independenţa României took place. Despite all its shortcomings as the theatrical game of the actors, the errors of an army of extras uncontrolled by direction which provoked unintended laughter in some scenes and rendered dramatically limp those of the beginning, the film was well received by spectators, being shown for several weeks. Through this realization, through the dimensions of its theme, through the distribution method chosen, through the genuine artistic intentions, through its professional editing (for the time), the creation of this film can be considered Romania's first step in the art of cinematography.

And yet he who had realized this work, the man who kept the whole team together, the theater director Grigore Brezeanu, was left disappointed. The press of the time made ostentatious mention of Leon Popescu, who financed the film and made sure to distance the other financiers, buying their part; no such praise was heaped on the artistic makers of the film. This caused producer Grigore Brezeanu to say in an interview given to the magazine "Rampa" and published on 13 April 1913: "My dream would have been to build a large film studio. I have come to believe that this is impossible. First of all, we are missing a large capital investment. Without money we cannot rival the foreign studios...A studio, according to our financiers, is something outside art, something in the realm of agriculture or the C.F.R. Hence I have abandoned this dream with great regret."
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Silent Appearance of the Romanian Army
blosmelinda9 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This film was projected during the 6th edition of Transilvania International Film Festival (TIFF) accompanied by music mixed by Dj DuBase. There are a few scenes presenting the life of Romanian peasants dancing their traditional dance, the departure to the army, relief-moments in the army: soldiers playing music to each other, dancing hora, priest blessing the national flag, a large number of shots presenting the war, the meetings of the rulers, a field full of injured soldiers (agonizing repeatedly in a theatrical manner) the last scene: the victory march of the Romanian army. The film has no plot, is a kind of war propaganda film, a sort of extended reconstructed news reel imagery, constructed from a series of tableau-like compositions, long sequences shot mainly in exteriors with static camera, almost every shot is a long shot. The formal characteristics are reminiscent of the Primitive Mode of Representation (Noel Burch's term for the early cinema until 1906). There where though a few tilted camera setups and a large number of scenes beautifully composed in depth - not so common for the period. The different, mostly not interrelated shots were concatenated with inter-titles recounting the (hi)story of the Romanian-Turk war. As the film has no plot, has no characters either, the faces of the characters cannot be seen on closer views. The king, the commander of the army can be recognized thanks to their cloths and center place in the composition.

According to the Festival reviewer this is the first Romanian feature film, and the the extras in the movie are the soldiers of the Romanian Army. The length of the film according to the TIFF-schedule is 82 minutes, but it was only 65 actually, maybe because of the faster projecting speed. And sometimes I noticed that the format wasn't fitting the screen. But nowadays how many cinema's are prepared technically to project silent feature reels?

It was an interesting experience, the music helped bridging the 95 years gap between the making of the film and the audience. There's going to be presented a 2007 fiction film about 'the making of' The War for Independence: Nae Caranfil's: The Rest is Silence.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed