Mabel at the Wheel (1914) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Young Chaplin demonstrates versatility in the role of Snidely Whiplash
wmorrow5917 July 2002
Mabel at the Wheel is one of those movies with a behind-the-scenes story that's more interesting than the movie itself. This was Chaplin's tenth comedy for Keystone during his year of apprenticeship, and his first two-reeler. Here he played one of his last out-and-out villain roles (although the feature-length Tillie's Punctured Romance was yet to come), and it also marked one of the last times he would work for a director other than himself. In fact, Chaplin's conflicts with director and co-star Mabel Normand almost got him fired from the studio.

Chaplin hadn't gotten along with his earlier directors, Henry Lehrman and George Nichols, but according to his autobiography having to take direction from a mere "girl" was the last straw. Charlie and Mabel argued bitterly during the making of this film. Chaplin was still a newcomer at Keystone and his colleagues didn't know what to make of him, but everyone loved Mabel. Producer Mack Sennett was on the verge of firing Chaplin when he learned that the newcomer's films were catching on and exhibitors wanted more of them A.S.A.P., so Chaplin was promised the chance to direct himself in return for finishing this movie the way Mabel wanted it.

In light of all this it's appropriate that Charlie and Mabel are at odds during much of Mabel at the Wheel. In the opening sequence Charlie is courting Mabel and offers her a ride on his bike, but she tumbles off into a mud-hole and, soon afterward, Charlie reveals his villainous nature. We notice right away that Chaplin looks odd here, sporting a goat-like beard on his chin and wearing the top hat and frock coat from his very first film appearance, Making a Living. The outfit suits the over-sized, Ford Sterling-style villainy he displays. He's certainly no gentleman. When Mabel strikes him across the face he promptly hits her back, and during the course of the film he sticks a pin in almost everyone's derrière. What a mean guy! The central plot concerns an auto race in which Mabel's beau (Harry McCoy) is scheduled to compete, but wicked Charlie and his henchmen abduct the lad, and Mabel must take the wheel in his place. For all the racing around, brick hurling and finger-biting the film is frankly short on laughs, but there are some points of interest. There's good cinematography and editing in the race sequence, though there aren't really any gags, just lots of frantic activity. Visible in the stands at the race track are several Keystone stalwarts such as Chester Conklin, Edgar Kennedy in a strangely dandified get-up, and a more characteristic Mack Sennett, hawking up spit and doing his usual mindless rube routine. As a performer Sennett was about as subtle as the movies he produced, but you have to give him credit: he knew what people liked. These films were hugely popular in their day. Mack's performance doesn't add much to Mabel at the Wheel, but he probably had to be on hand for the filming just to make sure his stars didn't murder each other.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mabel at the Wheel has Mabel Normand racing with Charlie Chaplin doing some funny villainy
tavm14 June 2011
Just watched this-a Keystone comedy short starring Mabel Normand and Charlie Chaplin-on YouTube. Ms. Normand is also the director and Chaplin does not play The Tramp but the comic villain. As such, he's the funniest thing here as he does overacting to a T which is such a standard technique in these silent movies whether melodrama or slapstick comedy. Mabel is quite an accomplished comic herself whether taking a fall, throwing bricks, or biting Charlie's hand. The race sequence doesn't really have any laughs but is quite exciting to watch as we see Ms. Normand do as the title says. Overall, Mabel at the Wheel is highly recommended. P.S. It would have been nice if any of the versions I checked out had a music accompaniment but I can't complain too much about the complete silent version I watched.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Charlie Chaplin's Ford Sterling impression (or "Atypical early Chaplin has points of interest for the fan")
deason2 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
When Chaplin arrived at Keystone, Ford Sterling (head of the Keystone Kops, among other roles) was the top comic at the studio. By all accounts Chaplin spent his first few films being asked to act more in Sterling's frantic trademark Keystone style, and none more so than in this one. By the time "Mabel at the Wheel" was shot, Ford Sterling had left Keystone, and Charlie, who had spent the majority of his previous films dressed in his famous Little Tramp costume (even if the soulful, wistful characterisation thereof was yet to be created), not only was made up in the Dutch comic style of Ford Sterling (a false goatee to go with his false moustache) and given Ford Sterling's frock coat to wear, but the whole style of his performance, down to his facial expressions and physical mannerisms, echo Ford Sterling's established screen persona. There is hardly a trace of the tramp in this film, but Chaplin's imitation of Ford Sterling is a model of accuracy.

The film is more interesting than amusing. Some of the wide shots of the crowd at the race feature actual spectators visibly amused at the antics of the actors, which is always fascinating to see after so many decades of movies carefully framed and set-managed to avoid such things.

That said, there are a few funny moments, and one "special effects" (by the standards of the time) shot almost shocking in the unexpectedness of its technique, in which a tilting camera is used to create the illusion that one of the race cars is tipping over in the race.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Another day at the races
Horst_In_Translation12 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Mabel at the Wheel" is an American short film from 1914, so it is already over a century old and that makes it of course a black-and-white silent movie. It is also known as "His Daredevil Queen" and "A Hot Finish". According to IMDb, it runs for 18 minutes, but all versions I found had over 20. It says a lot about lead actress Mabel Normand's popularity if her name is featured in the title here and not the legendary Charlie Chaplin in one of his rare villain performances. He plays quite a tough cookie, disrespectful, not scared of hitting women or even abductions. And even as somebody who likes Normand a lot, I cannot deny that Chaplin is really in the center of it committing his crimes or just pulling grimaces. Still sadly I must say that it was not good enough in terms of entertainment here, even if the film occasionally enters action movie terrain. If there is any real reason to see it, then to understand how popular races back then already were as this one is apparently referencing the actually existing and very prestigious Vanderbilt Cup. I hope the cast and crew, packed with big names from back then and Walk of Famers, enjoyed the race after filming and I hope they had a better time watching there than I had watching here as this short suffers from the usual silent film struggles, most of all lack of sufficient intertitles. It is too mediocre all in all and I suggest you skip it. Thumbs down.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nothing Can Stop Mabel
biophile21 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Not merely viewing this film for its humor, I watched it to gather an understanding about its time and the things it implied. In this film, Mabel Normand wants to drive her boyfriend's car, but he declines. The reason he declines was not given, but considering the title, it may well be because of condescension towards her as a female. Not content with no for an answer, and to Chaplin's convenience, she accepts Chaplin's offer to ride with him on his bike to spite her mate. Unfortunately for Chaplin, she falls into a puddle, becoming furious; she then reconciles with her boyfriend. Her partner was going to be in a car race, but Chaplin had plans to thwart his success. After tying him up in a shed, Mabel "takes the wheel." Also recognizing Mabel Normand being the directer and writer, I see this as a point of triumph for her, conveying herself as accomplishing what she wanted and breaking the gender gap. When her boyfriend was finally freed, he found to his delight that Mabel was the victor. The irony makes a point: women can do as well as men in men's stereotypical roles and there is no justification for men to be seen as superior!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Charlie goes racing
TheLittleSongbird24 May 2018
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.

He did do better than 'Mabel at the Wheel', still made very early on in his career where he was still finding his feet and not fully formed what he became famous for. Can understand why the Keystone period suffered from not being as best remembered or highly remembered than his later efforts, but they are mainly decent and important in their own right. 'Mabel at the Wheel' is a long way from a career high, but has a lot of nice things about it and is to me one of the better efforts in the 1914 Keystone batch and one of the better Chaplin and Mabel Normand collaborations.

'Mabel at the Wheel' is not as hilarious, charming or touching as his later work and some other shorts in the same period. The story is flimsy and the production values not as audacious. Occasionally, things feel a little scrappy and confused.

For someone who was still relatively new to the film industry and had literally just moved on from their stage background, 'Mabel at the Wheel' is not bad at all.

While not audacious, the film hardly looks ugly, is more than competently directed and is appealingly played. Chaplin looks comfortable for so early on and shows his stage expertise while opening it up that it doesn't become stagy or repetitive shtick. Not one of his most likeable characters though.

Although the humour, charm and emotion was done even better and became more refined later, 'Mabel at the Wheel' is humorous, sweet and easy to like, though the emotion is not quite there. It moves quickly and doesn't feel too long or short.

Overall, far from one of Chaplin's best but pretty good and perhaps one of his better efforts from the early Keystone period. 7/10 Bethany Cox
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Chaplin Back As Villain In Mabel At The Wheel
CitizenCaine14 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Chaplin once again plays villain to Mabel Normand's heroine in Mabel At The Wheel. Chaplin has two notorious henchmen with overgrown mustaches, one of whom is played by the famous Director of 1930's and 1940's films William A. Seiter. Mack Sennett and Charley Chase can be seen in the racing galley. Chaplin's job is to stop Mabel from winning the race at all costs, but like any dastardly villain worth his salt, Chaplin enlists others to do his dirty work. Whether it's a brick fight with Mabel or throwing smoke bombs on the race track, Chaplin has a grand old time hamming it up as villain for the camera. One wonders whether he enjoyed this role more than others he had played up to this point because he does look better and is somewhat funnier playing this part. ** of 4 stars.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mabel Is Racing the Wheels Off
nukisepp6 February 2021
'Mabel at the Wheel' is more Mabel Normand's vehicle than Charles Chaplin's. She is the star in this one and a shining star. Chaplin is going against his usual on-screen persona and is a full-fledged villain, but he is still amusing to watch. He goes wonderfully over the top while scheming how to ruin the race first for Mabel's boyfriend and then for Mabel. Although his motivations seem to remain unclear. At first Chaplin's Villain seems to compete with the racing driver over the heart of Mabel. But when the competition is removed and Mabel takes the wheel, the Villain goes on and tries to sabotage her race causing many life-threatening moments for her. One can assume that when he wasn't able to win over the girl, his main motivation became to kill her. A pretty dark theme for slapstick comedy.

The story is clear, not overly confusing plus the racing sequences are very interesting. It seems that there was more effort put into this one than many other Keystone productions. It might be because Mable Normand directed this film together with Mack Sennet. Mable, being a star, wanted a more polished film.

'Mabel at the Wheel' is one of the best early Chaplin's movies and probably my favorite Mabel Normand movie. It was his eleventh film - imagine - making eleven movies within barely three months. What a schedule.

I hereby recommend reading wmorrow59 review which shares some light behind the scenes on how Mabel and Chaplin didn't get along.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Charlie...before he was THE big star at Keystone.
planktonrules1 December 2022
Charlie Chaplin went from tiny bit player to the top comic for Keystone in less than a year. "Mabel at the Wheel" is one of his earlier films and as the title suggests, it's a Mabel Normand vehicle and he's playing second to her.

Charlie takes Mabel for a ride on his motorcycle but ends up accidentally dumping her in a giant mud puddle. Not surprisingly, she's not happy and she soon goes off with another guy in his race car. Oddly, while this happens right AFTER the mud puddle incident, she's 100% clean...and not a trace of mud.

Charlie is angry he lost her, so he now plots revenge (as you can tell with a bit of overacting by Charlie). He even ends up slugging poor Mabel (which isn't very funny)! This isn't the end to Charlie's nasty behavior--which also includes rock throwing and popping the car's tire. In fact, Charlie is such a jerk you really are rooting for her to run off with Charlie's rival.

In the second part of the comedy, there is a big race and Charlie and his goons kidnap the rival so that he cannot race. So, it's up to Mabel to save the day.

While slapstick comedy is supposed to be violent, seeing Charlie slugging Mabel is terribly unfunny and I cannot imagine audiences of the day liking this, as I've seen hundreds of slapstick films and never recall this sort of behavior. Usually it's more exaggerated and oddly funny. You also see no sign of Charlie's sweet and likable Little Tramp character here...he's just a nasty jerk. Clearly not among Chaplin's best and seeing him behave this way isn't exactly endearing. Fortunately, Chaplin soon stopped playing villain roles and went on to far better things.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Funny Mix: Action, Heroic Mabel, and Chaplin Imitating Sterling Ford
jayraskin119 December 2012
The plot of this movie is based on a Vitagraph movie from 1908: "An Auto Heroine" In that film, a woman's father gets kidnapped and she drives his car to win the race. In this film, a woman's boyfriend gets kidnapped and she drives his car to win the race, while her father cheers from the stands.

In an article called "Speeding Sweethearts of the Silent Screen," film historian William Drew notes that after Mary Pickford's car chase movie "A Beast At Bay" (Griffith, 1912), this is only the third movie to feature a woman's driving. It will only become standard in movies starting in 1915. Drew notes, "In fact, one can view Mabel at the Wheel as a kind of feminist parable with the heroine defeating the male competitors on the race course as well as the villainous Chaplin." Besides seeing Mabel Normand's feminist heroics, the other reason this film, directed by Ms. Normand, is noteworthy is Chaplin's unique performance. He plays the villain wearing a trench coat and whiskers. Through much of the film, he does what seems like a perfect impression of comedian Ford Sterling. At one point, Chaplin even crosses his eyes like Sterling. It should be remembered that Chaplin was hired at Keystone to replace Ford Sterling. In fact Chaplin's tramp costume uses Sterling's large size shoes, perhaps symbolizing the fact that he was hired to fill Sterling's shoes literally as well as figuratively.

The first five minutes of the film is quite different from the rest. Chaplin plays simply Harry McCoy's rival for Mabel Normand. This is exactly the same triangle we saw in Chaplin's first film, "Making a Living." The second five minutes of the film is different with Chaplin suddenly turning into a ridiculous villain caricature. He goes around jabbing people and tires with a pin.

There is a scene where Chaplin takes out a water hose to water a race car course. Apparently, Chaplin refused to do it. Chaplin probably did not see the humor in endangering people's lives. Slapping, punching, pricking and kicking people is one thing, but actually endangering people's lives is another. He worked off the set.

Famously, Mack Sennett threatened to fire him. He submitted and played the rest of the movie as Normand wanted him to, in Ford Sterling absurdist style. We should remember that Chaplin's humor was based on the funny drunk sketch he made famous. The drunk is funny, but not absurd. The absurd humor that Keystone dealt with was simply not something that Chaplin appreciated.

This is really a Mabel Normand film and it seems unfair to give Sennett credit for directing it when all he did was discipline Chaplin. Normand had her own problems with Sennett and was probably only staying with him at the time because he gave her the opportunity to direct.

There are some powerful images in the film: Mabel falling off a motorcycle, Mabel behind the wheel of the car with mechanic William Hauber, Charlie sitting next to Mabel and jabbing her with a pin and her jabbing him right back, and Mack Sennett as a country bumpkin in a cameo appearance. It seems possible that Mabel was expressing how she really felt about Sennett by having him act this way.

The original film was 1900 feet and the restored version is about 1400. Please keep in mind that over 25% of the film is still missing. Probably the jumpy, quick shots in the racing scenes were much smoother with longer shots in the original.

Sennett supposedly got a telegram from his partners in New York demanding more Chaplin films during the production of this film and only this telegram stopped him from firing Chaplin. I tend to think that it was the success of this movie that really put Chaplin on the map. While Chaplin was fine in his first ten films, there was nothing particularly distinguishing about him. This two-reeler would have established him as the real replacement for the popular Ford Sterling.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chaplin and Mabel
Michael_Elliott12 January 2009
Mabel at the Wheel (1914)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

The behind the scenes issues with this movie are pretty interesting but from what I've read Chaplin hated being directed by a woman and his constant battles with Normand almost got him fired. For whatever reason Keystone decided to keep him and Chaplin's hatred of "other directors" finally caused him to be directed by himself from this point on in his career. In the film Mabel and her boyfriend (Harry McCoy) have a falling out so she takes a ride with his rival (Chaplin) but she eventually gets knocked off his bike and into a puddle of mud. Later she's back with the boyfriend who's at a race track when Chaplin kidnaps him forcing Mabel to race the car. This is a mixed bag as far as the film goes because the first half is pretty funny but the second half dealing with the race falls apart. Seeing Chaplin and Mabel slap one another makes you wonder how much they both enjoyed it but these early scenes are certainly the best in the film. The actual auto race wasn't too thrilling or funny to me but things do pick up towards the end and Chaplin's final scene is very funny.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mabel vs Charlie Part 2
ducatic-822907 November 2016
The background to this movie is interesting. Mabel and Charlie had not appeared together since Mabel's Strange Predicament. Sennett brought the petulant pair together again in this film after 2 months, but when Charlie arrived for the shoot he was enraged to find Mabel behind the camera. Charlie felt women were best kept in the kitchen - he later had his many young and foolish wives locked up at home. While Mabel wanted to follow a script set by Mack Sennett, Charlie thought the new film needed gagging up. As the proposed gags would boost Chaplin's standing, Mabel refused to entertain them. Charlie immediately went on strike. On hearing this Sennett flew into a rage, storming into Charlie's dressing room shouting 'You'll do as you're told or get out!' However, the balance of power at Keystone was changing. The Englishman was a rising star, and his popularity could eventually equal or eclipse that of the lovely Mabel. Sennett had to keep the two together, or risk becoming the knucklehead who sacked the world's greatest comedian. He decided the two should bury the hatchet, and he directed the film himself (Sennett/Chaplin autobiographies).

Mabel was all sweetness after the furore, although she was unsure about riding pillion with Charlie on the Keystone motorbike – a type of machine he claimed to have ridden before. According to Mabel, the crazy Briton crashed the bike into a ditch before they'd gone twenty yards. He'd lied! Once he'd mastered the technique, all was set for a mad ride along a muddy track, where the hapless Mabel would be dumped in a mud pool. This was the cue for the usual Keystone battle of bricks between Mabel plus boyfriend and Charlie. Interesting how there are always some handy bricks lying around to be thrown by inmates of Sennett's 'University of Nonsense'. Charlie becomes a Ford Sterling- type villain for this film, and initiates various dastardly deeds, such as sticking a pin into Mabel's leg, thumping her in the face, and tying her boyfriend up. Without wishing to give the whole plot away, Mabel ends up taking over her boyfriend's racing car drive. The whole film is clearly based around a famous race filmed in Santa Monica, where a front wheel breaks off a car at Dead Man's Curve, causing it to overturn in spectacular fashion. Mabel openly enjoys the adulation she receives from the spectators and team at the conclusion of the race. Oh, how the cast adored their Keystone Girl!

Things to Note: [1] Charlie's motorbike is a chain drive 1912 Thor IV model. [2] The No. 4 racing car could be Sennett's own Stutz. [3] It is amusing to see the startled old fellow in shirtsleeves and braces,standing in his garden watching Charlie restart his motorbike – he thinks the Hell's Angels are in town. [4] Many roads around Hollywood in those days were seemingly rutted, muddy tracks. [5] When Mabel and Charlie have a fight, a seated spectator looks bemused,then positively scared.[ 6] The entire Keystone company appears to be in this film. [7] The race team's toolkit consists of one spanner, a file, a hand drill, and a bucket. High-tech that. [8] Mabel thinks race preparation comprises taking out a compact and powdering her nose. [9] The mechanic is in the race car to pump fuel and oil (furiously). [10] When the actual race car crashes, the mechanic is thrown out onto his feet. In the faked keystone crash scene the mechanic ends up under the vehicle.[11] There are plenty enough gags for Charlie in the film, and the lack of the standing on the hose gag (which caused the two stars to fall out) does not detract from the film. [12] Charlie reverts to a type of Ford Sterling costume for this film. Could it be that Mabel refused to work with the Tramp, as she feared being upstaged by the scruffy character? She might also have been fearful of the filthy Tramp outfit (Mrs Arbuckle claimed that Mabel used to buy Charlie new clothing, as he never washed his attire).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It abounds in funny situations
deickemeyer21 July 2018
Mabel Normand "gets over" finely in this two-reel comedy. It abounds in funny situations and is characterized throughout by that swiftness of action which has made Keystone comedies so popular. - The Moving Picture World, April 25, 1914
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed