Won in a Closet (1914) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Don't Come Knocking When the Closet's Rocking
boblipton7 August 2012
Mabel Normand stars and even directs this Keystone farce. Like many of them, it gives a slapstick twist to a D.W. Griffith piece, under whom Sennett and Normand had worked. In this case, the immediate source looks to be AN UNSEEN ENEMY.

Unfortunately, it is a rather poor effort, despite some interesting split-screen work. Mabel and Charles Avery are the young rustic lovers. Meanwhile, their parents are indulging in such lascivious activities as chin-chucking, when the approach of the young 'uns causes them to hide in a closet. On finding someone in the closet, the kids call the cops...

The shenanigans offered in this one are uninspired for the Keystones of this period and the fact that the National Film Preservation Foundation has posted it to their website at sixteen frames a second makes it almost unwatchable -- you can see motion blur, one-word titles remain on the screen for four seconds and given that most one-reelers time in at eight minutes by the 1920s, the fifteen minutes this one takes to play out is almost unbearable -- at a guess it should be projected at no fewer than nineteen frames a second. I'd avoid this one until some one puts it out at a suitable speed.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Griffith girl in comedy
ducatic-8229030 April 2020
Similar to many Keystone films, and especially the Bangville Police. Most Sennett comedies were send ups or burlesques of someone or something. Here the cops, country people and even D.W. Griffith are being ridiculed. Mabel is clearly playing a Griffith heroine -- a beautiful girl, very pure, but a little bit silly. How often is Mabel depicted as someone who loves the most ridiculous of men -- she does so here, although it is usually the very odd Mack Sennett who gains her affections. Whether it is Mabel or some other actor that directs, the outcomes are always the same, as Sennett always supervised everything. There were no directors as we know them today.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unlike many of the shorts from more than a century ago . . .
pixrox125 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
. . . this 99-year-old piece, WON IN A CLOSET, is not very understandable today, let alone entertaining in any way. If a detailed five-page synopsis of what action is supposed to be taking place still existed, it is possible the story could make a little more sense. Though this 13 minute, 4-second short has had at least one musical score written for it (by Michael D. Motilla), little is seen on the screen to suggest why anyone would go to such trouble. Was WON IN A CLOSET even among the Top 100 at the box office in 1914? If so, you sure have to feel sorry for the "captive audience" of which great-great grandma was part. Many if not most silent flicks of this era introduced the half dozen key characters with title cards naming both the role being played and the cast member doing the portrayal. However, I saw no evidence of such courtesies in WON IN A CLOSET. Instead, people--sometimes in vast crowds--come and go, usually with no discernible reason. At least if the Jackass folks remade this movie today, the closet would be catapulted high into the sky, instead of merely hosed down.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pretty bad, actually.
planktonrules31 July 2013
If you are wondering how you can see "Won in a Closet", it currently is available to watch at the National Film Preservation Foundation's website. The reason they have it is that there is a section for films that were recently discovered in New Zealand--and this is one of them. As for me, I didn't like it very much--so much for me telling you about NFPF!

This film is a bit like a reworking of Romeo and Juliet--with Mabel Norman and Charles Avery playing the lovers. Mabel's father and Charles' mother are against the marriage--as are the neighbors. But, the prospective in-laws get locked in a closet together--and Mabel does everything to keep them inside, as she thinks it's a hobo hiding inside. The problem is that none of this really works due to supreme over-acting (even by Keystone Studio's standards!!). A few examples would include folks literally jumping off the car into the creek (they were supposed to fall but it's obvious they were jumping), LOTS of wild gesticulations when acting (particularly by the father) and the over-reliance upon pratfalls since the plot just wasn't very funny. Overdoing these scenes was not unusual for a Keystone film but this one takes it to new heights and had only one mild laugh....just one.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Second Film Directed By Mabel Norman
jayraskin129 September 2012
This film was lost and only recently found in New Zealand and restored in 2010. I watched it on the National Film Preservation Foundation's website.

The first half of the film looks good. Unfortunately, the second half has many badly deteriorated shots.

There are a few good reasons for cinephiles to watch this. First it is the earliest example of Mabel directing a film that we have (actually her second film). Second, she looks absolutely gorgeous here. There are a couple of medium-close shots of her, quite unusual for 1914. It is easy to see why Sennett and others would fall in love with her.

This film was released two weeks before Chaplin's first film "Kid Auto Races." It seems quite possible that Chaplin was watching her make this film when he first arrived at Keystone. They starred together in their first film, "Mable's Strange Predicament" just six weeks after this. There is a "Tramp" in the film and the film style and motifs does bare a resemblance to a number of Chaplin's early films.

Apparently Edgar Kennedy is in the film, but I did not spot him. Hank Mann, who played the boxer in the brilliant boxing scene in Chaplin's "City Lights" (Chaplin,1931) is one of two "cut-ups" who fight with Mabel and her boyfriend.

The second part of the film with Mabel's mother and her sheriff boyfriend being trapped in a closet is a little weird. Bodies are sent tripping and flying against and over each other at a frantic pace and a Western version of the Keystone Cops appear.

While not anything particularly great, there are a few chuckles still here for Mabel Norman fans.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Normand the Director
Michael_Elliott3 December 2013
Won in a Cupboard (1914)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

This Keystone short was lost for many decades until a print turned up in 2010 in New Zealand of all places. Whenever a lost film is found it's reason for celebration even if the film in question is pretty bad, which is the case here. Mabel Normand and Charles Avery fall in love and the two want to get married but her father and his mother refuse. The parents end up trapped in a cupboard (actually a closet) when all chaos breaks loose. WON IN A CUPBOARD is a pretty boring movie but there's reason to celebrate it being discovered. This was the second film that Normand made as a director and since the first one is lost, this here is so far the earliest film buffs can see her work behind the camera. I thought there were a couple interesting shots to be found here including one where the two people discover one another. The scene has them walking towards the camera and while this was quite simple I still found it to be good. What's not so good is pretty much everything else. As a "comedy" this thing is downright bad because there's not a single scene where I actually laughed. The entire thing just seems so forced that you can't help but find the characters annoying and not a bit charming. Another problem is that the entire second half of the picture just doesn't work at all (not to mention the poor shape some of it is in). Fans of Normand will want to see this for its historic importance but all others should start somewhere else.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very diverting
deickemeyer3 April 2018
Featuring Mabel Normand in a nonsense number. Her "ideal" was a laugh in himself and the numerous entanglements into which the love affair is precipitated prove very diverting. - The Moving Picture World, January 24, 1914
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed