The Blue Eagle (1926) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Ford starts the pattern
westerfieldalfred21 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The Blue Eagle is not a very good film but it shows where Ford is going. Two tough guys fight over... whatever and wind up pals. It doesn't make a lot of sense, perhaps because of the poor quality of the restoration. Motivations are shallow. The fights don't look very scripted with actual punches thrown. The gloves must have been softened somehow. But, naturally, after the brutal slug-fest there's not a mark on either combatant.

It's interesting to see George O'Brien, Janet Gaynor and Margaret Lindsey one year before Sunrise. Only Gaynor stands out in a flirtatious performance that shows why she was about to become a major star. Frankly, this is the only reason to watch the film.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Janet Gaynor is Fetching in an Early Role
kidboots3 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Janet Gaynor had already appeared in several two reel comedies and again as an extra in a few Laura La Plante films before she caught the eye of Winfield Sheehan, Vice President in charge of production at Fox studios. Always on the look out for talent and seeing a lot of potential in Janet, he signed her to a $100 weekly contract. During the time he remained at Fox, he saw to it that not only did Janet have the best dressing room on the lot but she always had fresh flowers daily. She was show cased in this run of the mill buddy movie - not only did she have Fox's prestigious director John Ford at the helm and also Fox's top male star, George O'Brien but she looked very fetching in her trademark tam-o-shanter!!

Starting off as a Ford he-man actioner with two gobs, both from rival street gangs but, at sea, the stoker room too small a place to hold them!! There is a "grudge" boxing match where George O'Brien really lives up to his nickname "The Torso" but there is then some missing footage of an obvious battle and a burial at sea. It then removes to civvy street and after a welcome home dance in which sweet Janet Gaynor is introduced as Rosie Cooper, a charmer who is holding both boys at arms length, the main theme is introduced - Drugs!!!

George has returned home to find his brother "Limpy" (Phillip Ford) looking dragged down and vows to help him but when a young mother is found dead in her tenement room, drugs are the killer and Father Joe (Robert Edeson) enlists the aid of both George and his rival Tim to fight the scourge using a secret weapon!! The secret weapon is gun powder and it is used to blow up a submarine with "enough dope on board to destroy 1,000s of lives"!! - according to the James Bond like finale!! George, witnessing his brother "Limpy" drowning when the sub, where he has fled to for safety, refuses to open the hatch to let him in. And surprise, surprise!! there is another fight scene where George is asked, yet again, to remove his shirt and get sweaty all for the sake of female fans who had paid to see "The Torso" and would not be denied!!

According to "The Fox Girls", "The Blue Eagle" is 6200' long which makes it longer than "Sunrise" (at 6080') so there is a sizable chunk missing. Definitely at the beginning there is a naval battle where Dizzy is killed and buried at sea - missing!! And I would say that most of Margaret Livingston's footage is also gone, because given high billing, she is introduced only at the end. She is Dizzy's widow and Father Joe has convinced her to be a mother to the dead woman's child but posters and lobby card's of the day give her another role. She is portrayed on the posters as a vamp - a role that Livingston perfected in "Sunrise". Part way through the movie, Rosie flounces off in a huff, maybe that's where Livingston comes in as a femme fatale - who knows??

As Tim, William Russell who had been a western star from the earliest days, unfortunately died from pneumonia in 1929. Phillip Ford (Limpy) made a name for himself as a director, this was his last movie as an actor!!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Really odd minor Ford picture
mgmax4 October 1999
Imagine a version of What Price Glory in which the two brawlin' rivals take on a big drug dealer who has a James Bond-like lair complete with submarine. You couldn't have sold that as a blaxploitation film to AIP in the 70s-- though you might be able to sell it as a Jackie Chan movie now-- but who'd have ever thought that you could have sold it as a John Ford picture at Fox in the twenties? That's basically what this very minor but watchable Ford film is about; it might be better if the lost footage, sadly, didn't include the big naval battle scene in the middle. Gaynor is charming as the object of the rivals' affection, though this is no rival to Sunrise as a pairing of her and O'Brien.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Overstuffed misfire
davidmvining11 October 2021
Well, this was disappointing. Coming off of his strongest silent entry, John Ford makes an overstuffed and barely coherent little issue film that just simply doesn't work in The Blue Eagle. Moving in several directions at once but never really seems to understand what story it wants to tell.

It begins on a naval vessel during World War I. In the boiler room are two men, George Darcy (George O'Brien) and Tim Ryan (William Russell). They're both from the same town and heads of local rival gangs back home. And their gangs are there with them in the boiler room. Out of the gate this film starts with a heaping dose of contrivance. It's not the greatest place to start. The rivalry quickly comes to a head and the two, both wooing the same woman back home (Janet Gaynor's Rose), start swinging at each other. Being a Hollywood production in the 20s, what does the ship's command personnel decide to do with such a situation? If you thought that they would organize an on deck and ad hoc boxing match to settle the affair forever, you'd be right.

The fight gets called off when the ship is called into action, though, (in a sequence that has been lost and replaced with descriptive intertitles) and suddenly the war is over. How important was it that these two were brothers in arms on a naval vessel in time of war? None important, that's how much.

The two go back home and return to their lives. George has a younger brother, Limpy (Philip Ford), who's gotten into - something - during the war. It's unclear as it happens, and it's weird to me that it's so unclear. This was pre-Hayes Code and the limits on showing things like drug use were much less stringent than less than a decade later. In fact, later in the film, they say that there's a "dope" epidemic in the city (it becomes the story's plot at about the halfway point). The scene that introduces Limpy, though, is much less clear. Limpy sits on a bed next to another man, both in suits, and the other man kind of looks a bit spaced out. I honestly thought Limpy had gotten involved in the mob. There's also business between George and Tim and Rose as Rose plays with both of their hearts at a dance organized by the local revered.

The plot that eventually develops (quite seriously at about the 30-minute point of a 56-minute long film) is that the police want Tim and George to unite forces to fight the dope smugglers who have (checks notes) a submarine to smuggle drugs into the city. Not like a little submarine but a full-on military grade submarine. After the deaths of a couple of close friends of each (contrivance is all over this film) the two decide to go ahead and chase off the drug smugglers together in the typical Ford action sequence, though this one ends up so confused visually that it's often hard to figure out what's actually happening on screen.

This feels like some of Ford's earliest films. Unfocused, poorly structured, and often feeling completely random, it's a real disappointment after the magnificent 3 Bad Men. But those were the early studio days. The guy was making something like three movies a year. There was no real time to agonize over details. You filmed what the script said and handed it off to the editor to finish up while you started working on the next one. This system can produce great works, and it can produce confused end products that probably could have been fixed with more time and attention.

Even so, this is probably Ford's lowest point in his silent period.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining formula silent action melodrama.
Mozjoukine7 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In it's frequently blotchy Library of Congress Motion Picture Conservation Center restoration and missing the big sea battle, this is still one of the more entertaining silent action melodramas of its day.

Frequently shirtless O'Brien is in a more vicious Flag & Quirt relationship with leading man of the previous decade Russell - as naval stokers, competing for a winning young Gaynor and leading post war street gangs who combine to blow up a dope smuggler's submarine, before punching it out in the ring under the supervision of Salvation Army officer Edeson and joining the American legion together.

The idea content is occasionally alarming but bits are better than the formulaic plot line and it's a first airing for a number of ideas Ford uses in later films - SEAS BENEATH's submerging sub, THEY WERE EXPENDABLE's speeding boats or DONOVAN'S REEF's brawling ex navy men.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Cast Makes It Worth Watching
Michael_Elliott8 November 2017
The Blue Eagle (1926)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

George (George O'Brien) and 'Big' TIm (WIlliam Russell) are in the Navy fighting in WWI but they spend more time battling each other because they're both in love with Rose (Janet Gaynor). After the war they return home and start fighting over the girl but soon drugs are destroying their town so they decide to fight that.

THE BLUE EAGLE is a rather bizarre film from director John Ford. It clocks in at just 56-minutes and is said to be missing at least a reel and possibly more. The print I watched from The Library of Congress is missing an entire battle sequence early on, which was supposed to be the highlight of the picture.

I'm curious if more is missing here but as it stands in its current version, it's certainly worth watching if you're a fan of the director. The majority of the running time is more slapstick than anything else as the two men name call and fight each other and in fact that are two scenes inside a ring, which is a lot considering the already short running time.

The performances by the three leads are good enough to where you should watch the picture and that's especially true for Gaynor. The film isn't a complete success because the back-and-forth love triangle just isn't all that funny and the drug scenario pretty much comes out of nowhere and almost seems like it should be a separate movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed