The Divorcee (1930) Poster

(1930)

User Reviews

Review this title
61 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Neglected Landmark, More Often Discussed Than Actually Seen
gftbiloxi12 April 2005
THE Divorcée was created in the first wave of "all talking pictures," an era in which directors, writers, and actors often struggled to find styles appropriate to the new technology. At the time, it was hailed as a masterpiece of realism; today, however, it is a film more often discussed than actually seen, for there is no escaping the fact that the film is stylistically dated. Even so, it remains a landmark of its era--and given its historical importance it should be seen by any one with a serious interest in the history of American cinema.

The film is "pre-code," which is to say that it was made during a handful of years in the early 1930s when Hollywood's self-censorship was more the subject of jokes than of reality, and THE Divorcée was among the first Hollywood talkies to openly address both female sexuality and the sexual double standard. The story finds Jerry (Norma Shearer) and Ted (Chester Morris) happily married--but on their third anniversary Jerry discovers that Ted has been unfaithful, something that Ted dismisses with the words "it doesn't mean a thing." Angry and hurt, Jerry responds by having a one night stand of her own--and then is astonished by Ted's hypocrisy when he declares that her infidelity "isn't the same thing." The same story has been told so often that today we take it for granted, but in 1930 it was extremely controversial, and the cast plays it out with considerable intensity. Most notable is star Norma Shearer; although changing styles have left her sadly neglected, in her own era she was considered among the finest actresses on the screen and noted for her unusual beauty, memorable speaking voice, and tremendous star quality. In THE Divorcée she gives it everything she has, and her power is such that most viewers will find she quickly transcends the stylistically dated aspects of both the film and her own performance.

Over the years I've seen the film several times--most impressively on the big screen, where the larger than life performances seem considerably less affected--and I've enjoyed it quite a bit every time. If you are interested in exploring early 1930s Hollywood films, you could do considerably worse than to begin with THE Divorcée, which was my own introduction to that film era. If you are already interested in early 1930s film and have never seen it... this one belongs on your shelf, and no excuses.

Gary F. Taylor, aka GFT
72 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Norma Shearer gives one of the all-time great performances
emdragon9 February 2005
The Divorcée, set in 1930 New York, profiles a pair of party-making revelers amidst an entire circle of friends in high society. . .before and after they dare to turn their lives over to the institution of marriage, which in this world of around the clock carousing is a far cry from what is expected of them by their partying circle of friends. Norma Shearer, in what truly is one of the silver screen's great performances, plays the creatively witty and sweetly charming high society gal Jerry Martin. She can have any man in the group, but chooses Ted. They are married, and enter into an enduring period of romantic fairytale bliss (3 Years). Then, on the eve of their 3rd wedding anniversary everything unravels in a sea of infidelity, bitter honesty, and emotion. Norma Shearer's performance completely enraptures, and in an honest portrayal of ensuing emotional fallout, we see the inner struggles of the modern enlightened woman of her time. Robert Mongomery, in a supporting role, shines as well as the veritable proprietor of the circle of friends and one of the reveling agents of promiscuous redress. The film's direction is interesting, the makeup slightly absurd (it is 1930), and the cinematography non-existent. . .yet Ms Shearer's riveting abilities entrance the audience, and more than carry the day.
33 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Controversial Drama That Has Lost Some of its Edge
nycritic25 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
One of the many productions to tackle issues later forbidden by the Hays Code, THE Divorcée is a completely modern account about a marriage gone bad due to the infidelities and debaucheries of not only the man, but the woman. That the woman in question was none other than Norma Shearer in a very risky move which paid off and gave her the Oscar for Best Actress proves the mettle in Shearer, but also proved the implicit involvement of Irving Thalberg.

Like early talkies, there is a tinny, flat quality to the sound which lessens some of the emotional impact from the movie, and the way these people talk is a little too rapid at times, with an emphasis in staging every sentence with meaning -- a holdover from the silent movie days. Harsh lighting doesn't help, as some of the cuts between scenes and dissolves which indicate either the passing of time (and their debauchery) and Jerry's liaisons with other men, shown awkwardly in close-ups of their hands and off-screen dialog.

This is a movie to view as a study of American culture at the very end of the Roaring Twenties when women were assuredly emancipating their position in society, but there isn't a dated bone in this story's body: women even today are still punished in many societies, including ours, if they decide to take matters into their own hands, a point THE Divorcée makes very well. The only segment in which it falters is right at the end, when Jerry decides she loves Ted after all and would like to renew their marriage: on seeing their brittle relationship, it somehow comes off false although Shearer's performance and the way her character is written does not make it so. However, her choice to be happily married over being a swinging baby comes off as a reflection of not only women but people even today, and in that way, this film is a great example.

Shearer gave much better performances than the one she was awarded for; however, it's up to the viewer to decide if hers Oscar-worthy. Considering her competition, it must have been tight.
35 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the best women's films of its time (or any time)
clairegm1322 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS The Divorcee takes a hard look at the double standard. This is one of my personal favorite films of the Pre-Code Era because it's exactly the kind of film that the Code guarded against. Norma Shearer's character is extremely strong-willed and essentially proposes to her boyfriend at the beginning of the film. Later on she finds out her husband has cheated on her, and she does the only thing she could think of to do: she "balances their accounts." Ted cannot handle being cheated on himself and when she states plainly what she has done he asks her for divorce. Throughout the rest of the film though they both regret not being together, it is Ted who dips the lowest, becoming too drunk to even go to work. Jerry is still strong (sad that it had to end the way it did, but strong) and has many exploits with various men, but she knows she still loves Ted. In the end it is Ted who needs Jerry the most, and they end up back together on New Year's. The moral of this story is not that the married couple gets back together where it should be-- the moral of this story is that no double standard should ever exist. A woman is not going to sit idly by while her man cheats on her, nor should she. A man has to realize that he cannot ask for forgiveness if he is not willing to forgive the same act. That is why this film defines Pre-Code in my mind-- Jerry states at the beginning that they'll have a go at it only if they are equals. She finds out that she is not his equal-- she is the better man. This movie would not only never have been made after the Code was enforced (due to the adultery, allusions to sex, and the strong female protagonist)-- I don't think it would be made now. What a great female protagonist-- Shearer is magnificent (as she usually is). Chester Morris is great and Robert Montgomery is the fun-loving best friend, who acts as an organ- grinder's monkey at one point-- just delightful! Needless to say I recommend this movie to anyone and everyone!
33 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very stylish and surprisingly relevant and fresh
AlsExGal3 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I just rewatched this one last night. This 1930 MGM film tells the story of a happily married couple, whose marriage crumbles under the taint of infidelity.

Norma Shearer portrayed Jerry Martin, a happily married New York socialite, who discovers that her husband, Ted (Chester Morris), had a drunken one night stand with some blowsy woman. She tried to pretend that it was water under the bridge and openly forgave him. But his infidelity continued to bother her. And when he leaves New York for a business trip to Chicago, she has a one night stand with his best friend, Don (Robert Montgomery). Jerry confesses her infidelity and discovers that as far as Ted is concerned, what was good for the goose, was not for the gander. Furthermore, Ted is not so concerned about the pain of the infidelity as he is about his pride and that someone in "their set" is laughing at him. This is the last straw for Jerry, and a divorce follows with what must be a pile of alimony because Jerry seems to lack no luxury even though she lacks a job. Not bad work for a fairly short marriage.

I understand that the Jerry Martin role nearly evaded Norma Shearer, because husband and MGM production chief Irving Thalberg did not feel that the role suited her. She used a series of sexy photographs taken by George Hurrell to convince Thalberg that she could do the role. And she certainly proved that she was the right woman for the role. What I liked about Shearer's take on Jerry was that she was a complex woman who discovered that she could not hide her feelings - whether she was disturbed by her husband's infidelity and hypocrisy; or her longing to reconcile with him, despite enjoying the company of other men. Shearer certainly deserved her Oscar.

Although he had some moments of over-the-top acting as Ted Martin - Jerry's husband, Chester Morris did a pretty good job portraying the newspaper man, who tried to dismiss his own infidelity and discovered how his wife truly felt in the worst possible way. What I found interesting about Ted is how alcohol led to a great deal of his troubles. It was booze that encouraged him to cheat on Jerry. And it was booze that he indulged in following the breakup of his marriage and loss of his job.

Robert Montgomery was at turns rather funny and sexy as Don, Ted's best friend with whom she cheated. There's a funny midnight scene in a deli where everybody is in top hat and tails, and Ted is talking to Don about how he would still like to kill the guy that broke up his home, if only he knew who that was. Don makes a polite but speedy exit.

Many have dismissed Conrad Nagel as a boring actor, who performance in the movie was not worth mentioning. Mind you, his role as Paul, Jerry's former boyfriend was not as splashy as Morris or Montgomery's role, Nagel still managed to invest quite a bit of angst in his role as a man who is dealt a double blow in life when the woman he loves (Jerry) marries another man and he finds himself in a loveless marriage to a woman (Judith Wood), whose face he had disfigured due to a drunken car accident.

The attitudes and personalities of most of the major characters seemed relevant today. Despite the late 20s/early 30s wardrobe and slang, the so-called "Bright Young Things" were not really different from the Twenty and Thirtysomethings in the dating scene, today. Do remember,also, that though this film was post stock market crash, that it was still pre Depression. Things were still rolling pretty good for most people at this point.

I realized that the movie had a "happy ending" that many modern viewers might not care for. But for me, it was an ending in which both husband and wife were humbled. They not only forgave each other, but forgave themselves. I bought it.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sophisticated comedy-drama
gridoon202411 March 2018
An intelligent, adult comedy-drama about men, women, marriage, double standards, and forgiveness. Thanks to the writing (often sophisticated), the direction (quite accomplished for a 1930 movie) and a first-rate cast, these characters, their feelings, their problems remain contemporary and relatable nearly 90 years later. *** out of 4.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pre-Code Film Tests The Limits of Cinema's Production Moral Code
springfieldrental1 August 2022
It had a plot that couldn't possibly have been made under the strict enforcement of the film production code beginning in mid-1934. During the so-called 'Pre-Code' era, however, MGM's April 1930 "The Divorcee" was not only produced and released nationwide, but it became an enormous hit with both the public and the film critics. Based on the controversial bestselling 1929 novel by Ursula Parrott, 'Ex-Wife,' "The Divorcee" focuses on a couple whose husband has a fling three years into their marriage. Once she finds out, the wife decides the settle the score by having an affair herself. That sends the pair's marriage down a rocky slope.

"The Divorcee" shows Ted's (Chester Morris) wife Jerry(Norma Shearer), enjoying her extra-marital frolicks with a number of men after she separates from her husband, starting with their pal Don (Robert Montgomery). Under the new Production Code after 1934, Jerry would be required to feel painfully remorseful from her enjoying her new 'boyfriends.' But here, she doesn't harbor any deep regrets from her numerous romps. There may be a shallowness in her feelings, but she suffers no repercussions. MGM, worried about the potential backlash if word got out the studio was adapting the 'Ex-Wife' novel into a feature film, gave the production the working title 'The High Road.' MGM avoided any mention of the book's title in the movie's credits, simply stating "Based on a novel by Ursula Parrott."

Actress Joan Crawford was MGM producer Irving Thalberg's pick to play the role of Jerry when the studio bought the rights to Parrott's novel. However, Norma Shearer, Thalberg's wife, was immensely interested in the part. She was looking for a juicy role to break the public perception she was just a goodie-two-shoes. Thalberg nixed her from even thinking about playing Jerry. Determined, Shearer arranged a photography session where she dressed in a sheer lingerie posing provocatively. When Thalberg saw the photos of his wife, after he put his eyeballs back into their sockets, he agreed she could convincingly carry the role of an adulteress. The press heard about the behind the scenes drama and asked Crawford for a statement on Thalberg's decision. "What do you expect?" she said. "She sleeps with the boss."

Typical of "The Divorce's" positive reviews was this from Photoplay: "As neat an essay on marital unfaithfulness as has been made in Hollywood. It sets Norma Shearer at the very top of the acting class. You won't forget this picture, and you'll undoubtedly go home and have a good long talk with your spouse." Shearer's role as the get-even spouse won her the Academy Awards' Best Actress. The movie's director, Robert Leonard, a veteran of helming pictures since 1913, was nominated for Best Director. "The Divorcee" was also nominated for Best Picture (Outstanding Production) and John Meehan for Best Writing.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Norma Gets Around
bkoganbing23 November 2007
In the years following The Divorcée, Norma Shearer was nominated for Best Actress for A Free Soul, The Barretts of Wimpole Street, Romeo and Juliet and Marie Antoinette. Personally I think all of those films were better than The Divorcée. Still this is the one she took home the gold for.

The Divorcée is a rather dated drama about an upper crust set of men and women who basically wife swap. The leader of this social set is Norma Shearer who gets around to all the available men in the cast and some not available. Not that her husband Chester Morris is letting the grass grow under his feet either. The film's action starts during the age of the high living Roaring Twenties with all that implies.

The three men in Norma's life are Morris, Robert Montgomery, and Conrad Nagel and there are hints of others being there as well after Norma divorces Morris. Florence Eldridge in one of her few films without her husband Fredric March plays her best friend and Helen Johnson plays the tragic wife of Conrad Nagel who only marries her after she's disfigured in a DWI that Nagel had after Shearer jilts him early on in the film.

All of them are quite good, but the film is really Norma's show. She runs through quite the gamut of emotions and the technical virtuosity of her performance is what got her the Oscar. That and the fact she was married to one of the most powerful moguls in Hollywood certainly helped.

There's a quite good performance by Tyler Brooke as the perpetually inebriated hanger on with their set. For a slice of life from The Roaring Twenties I'd look at The Divorcée.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fast, advanced sound and naturalistic acting, and modern themes...terrific!
secondtake26 January 2010
The Divorcée (1930)

The start of this is such a busy, overlapping party scene in a country house, you can't help but get swept up in it. And if some of the acting or a few of the quips are not perfect, the best moments are really fun and spirited. The naturalism is really refreshing, and pace fast, and the dialog real. Then it spins out of control--the events, not the movie--and before fifteen minutes are up, there's a brief terrible moment that has two or three of the actors exploring an hysteria that a method actor would be proud of. It's intense, great stuff. Get at least that far in.

The rest of the movie follows suit, through quiet and fast moments, and the drama turns to melodrama and back, all pinned together by the ever convincing Norma Shearer. The themes--fidelity and infidelity, love and friendship, the superficial versus the things that matter--give it all something to chew on or laugh at at ever turn.

It's unnecessary to say that this is just two years after the full advent of sound, and it's a very developed, mature element in the movies. In fact, the density of things going on would never have been possible with intertitles, and it must have been a revelation to audiences and movie makers equally. Fast dialog and overlapping events are a natural extension of the theater, of course, but with the ability to shift scenes and zip down wooded roads with the camera is the essence of cinema.

So, in all, for how it's made, for the acting (the best of it), and for the serious, important themes, this is gem, an amazing movie, whatever its hiccups and flaws here and there. I wouldn't miss it.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Racy divorce
TheLittleSongbird18 March 2020
Have liked a fair share of Norma Shearer's performances, a big example being 'Smilin Through' which she is magnificent in. She was my main reason in wanting to see 'The Divorcee' and to see what the fuss was about with her Oscar win for her performance (whether she deserved it or not). The subject matter was interesting and quite racy to explore in film back when talkies were in their early days, with themes and such that are hardly irrelevant now.

'The Divorcee' to me has its flaws and part of me was expecting more considering that it won one Oscar and nominated for another three. It is still a very interesting and well executed film though, with a lot of admirable qualities. Shearer's win was not undeserving in my view, but do think that she gave better performances in her career (her not even being nominated for 'Smilin Through' was a big oversight). The script was also a worthy nominee for how it handles the film's difficult subject, though there were better films overall released that year (i.e. 'All Quiet on the Western Front', the two films are not in the same league).

Will get the flaws out of the way. The pace is a bit creaky at times.

Chester Morris is wooden with not much screen presence and personally did fail to see the attraction. The ending was not easy to swallow, with what happens being unrealistic and not making sense in real life. After having such racy content on the whole, the film just ends on a safe and too tidy note.

It is a very handsomely produced film though, the photography is remarkably slick and elegant and there is not too much of a too fussy feel to the costumes and sets. 'The Divorcee' is on the most part skillfully directed and not with too much of a heavy hand and Shearer brings sophistication and appealing spunk to the lead role. Robert Montgomery is the other cast standout in a very smooth and charming turn.

One of 'The Divorcee's' biggest stars is the script, which is sophisticated and sharp-witted, with some surprising boldness that didn't come over to me as too tame now, while treating a serious subject with respect without being too morose or anything. The story occasionally creaks and the ending doesn't convince, but much of it is compelling and one can see clearly, with its ahead of the time execution in its frankness, that the subject and the themes were daring back then. Also don't think they have dated, the topic is still a very much relevant one now and the themes are also still relatable and true to real life.

Summing up, could have been more but interesting and well done. 7/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Sudsy Look At A Sometimes-Sexy Norma Shearer
ccthemovieman-110 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is a very dated soap opera but I wanted to see it because I often like classic films and I've never actually sat through one that starred Norma Shearer.

Was Norma Shearer a sexy woman? I found her just okay, nothing special. At times she's attractive; other times not so. She giggles in here a lot and - like Jean Harlow - likes slinky dresses.

The dialog in most "talkies" up until the later 1930s is very dated, especially in the "Pre-Code Era." Actually, I find it fun to hear these odd expressions of the day, but all the "darling" this and "darling" that get a little nauseating after a short time and the corny lines, hysterical women, sexist men, etc., wear thin fast.

In essence, this was a woman's movie with the message that it's NOT all right for a man to cheat on her husband but bad if a woman does. I buy that. As you all know, it's bad if either does! That's the only problem. This idiot husband, played by Chester Morris, makes an absolute ton of stupid remarks after admitting he had an affair with "Janice" and that "it doesn't mean a thing."

However, that same night after he shuffles off to Buffalo for a work assignment, she hits the sack (not shown) with a buddy. Two wrongs make a right? Of course not, but Shearer's character "Jerry" and her response to the whole thing is interesting to watch. And, yes, she slowly sees the error of her ways and "repents" at the end. That ending may be predictable, but it will still draw a tear or two to your eyes.

The film gets really sudsy the last half, especially in the last hour. I thought, "Wow, this would play well on the Lifetime Network - what a women's soaper." So, if you like that sort of thing - nothing but men and women in and out of all kinds of relationships and talking about them - then this film, dated or not, is for you.
12 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Shearer is Excellent
kscmtgrove30 September 2006
The scene where Norma Shearer begs Chester Morris to stay together in their marriage is truly riveting and powerful . It is one of the most truly amazing performances on film. I remember being so genuinely blown away by the beauty and power of that performance that I jumped out of my chair to grab the rental box positive she must have won an Oscar, she had. Very sexy movie, Robert Montgomery is smooth as always. I see some people found it hokey or contrived, I did not, The emotions covered here are as relevant today as in 1930. Attractive, complex characters. For the romantic in all of us, where decency and honor will prevail.
32 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Compared to "The Women"
dsmith-250003 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
To see and think about this movie, you have to consider "The Women" in the same context. Husband has affair. Wife finds out and cannot stand the thought. Although there is no wife's affair in The Women, that is one difference. The married couple get divorced. Others get married. Robert Montgomery's character turns out to be a cowardly heal. The second difference is that Shearer's character in this goes out and parties hard, while in The Women, she is dating another (unseen) man who wants to marry her. But in the end, they both turn out about the same way. With the divorced couple back together, but not yet officially reconciled or remarried.

The ending actually reverses the idea of the movie that women should treat marriage and men the same way unfaithful husbands treat wives.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This is not just Pre-Code.
Handlinghandel3 March 2008
It also seems Prehistoric.

It's an early talking picture. We read about the disdain for movies that East Coast writers had and I think they may have been thinking of this sort of thing. After all, there were some brilliant films in the first few years of the talkies. One has to look only at "Scarface," which still shocks today. Jean Harlow, Loretta Young, Barbara Stanwyck, Constance Bennett ... There were many great, saucy stars. (And of course, there was Mae Wrest, too!) Please don't misunderstand me: I like Norma Shearer in many movies. She's superb in "The Women," for example. But it seems that her idea of being racy, as shown here, was to giggle a lot -- and maybe not to wear a bra.

The movie presents itself as the latest in adult views. However, it is essentially very conventional.

The dialog is so stilted, one expects someone to burst onto the scene at any moment asking "Tennis, anyone?"
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Witty, heartbreaking, and surprising
agent-too10 April 2007
The Divorcée has much more to offer than the melodramatic plot may insinuate. Sparkling performances aside (including Norma Shearer's Oscar-winning turn), the film is full of witty dialogue, risqué subject matter, and a serious, adult look at divorce, not seen again for decades. The film not only showcases the largely-forgotten Shearer beautifully, an actress who continually pushed subject matter and fought for strong roles, but proves itself as a pivotal 1930's Hollywood product. The Divorcée is appreciable as a pre-code, and worth seeing for its unusually bold themes alone, but its surprising and often heartbreaking plot makes it an unusual gem.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Only Robert Montgomery seemed to know what he was doing
piapia31 March 1999
Of course you have to make concessions to 1930 movies. The story of "The Divorcee" is openly ridiculous, and must have been ridiculous at the time. The leading character was supposed to be a rebel, but if you look closely she is the most conventional woman you can imagine, and her reaction to her husband's infidelity, perfectly naïve and teenagerish. Norma Shearer won an Oscar for one of the most incompetent pieces of acting that I have seen. Only Chester Morris gave a worse performance. The only actor who was really acting was the youthful Robert Montgomery, who created a real, living playboy and gave early proof of the notable actor he would become in pictures like Night Must Fall, The Earl of Chicago and Rage in Heaven to name but a few. Not all 1930 movies were so weak. I recently saw and commented The Big House. What a picture!
5 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Divorcee review
JoeytheBrit1 July 2020
Norma Shearer makes a strong impression playing against type as a married woman who takes revenge in kind when she discovers her husband (Chester Morris) has cheated on her. It's pre-code, which means it's a lot more candid about the implications surrounding infidelity, and the screenplay is intelligent and wry, but the way in which things are resolved doesn't really send out a positive message.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One Good Turn Deserves Another
wes-connors8 March 2008
Norma Shearer (as Jerry Martin) tests the freedom acceptable for men, but not permissible for women - the sexual "Double Standard". As the film opens, Ms. Shearer is an happily married woman. However, husband Chester Morris (as Ted Martin) gets "plastered", and succumbs to the advances of a sexually aggressive woman… at least, that's what is discernible from the after-the-fact behavior of the adulterous duo, as Shearer catches them in a light embrace. Disillusioned, Shearer turns the tables by having a "one night stand" of her own - with one of the soon-to-be divorced couple's pals.

In a film themed like Greta Garbo's recent "The Single Standard" (1929), MGM takes another shot at the sexual "Double Standard". The results are similar, but not the same. Shearer's winning performance is bold, fascinating, and fun to watch; she elevates the character far above the material. The film's problem is that it pulls its punches with a disappointing ending, extinguishing a truly interesting story. Yet, somehow, Shearer makes the character ring true. It's a strong performance, which manages to rise above the film's abandonment of its thesis.

Director Robert Z. Leonard, writer John Meehan, and a fine supporting cast are a great help. Robert Montgomery's performance (as Don) is a standout. And, Conrad Nagel (as Paul) is another Shearer castoff, who has a potable problem; he has a harrowing car crash near the film's opening. A lot of alcohol is consumed in this movie! "The Divorcée" is a flawed, but worthwhile film.

******* The Divorcée (4/19/30) Robert Z. Leonard ~ Norma Shearer, Chester Morris, Robert Montgomery, Conrad Nagel
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Shearer Out to Prove the Unfairness of the Double Standard to Her Philandering Husband
EUyeshima5 March 2008
Along with Garbo, Norma Shearer was fast becoming MGM's prestige star in 1930 thanks to some degree to her marriage to the mythic studio head Irving Thalberg. However, she was also uniquely talented as proved by the diversity of her films. Although she is remembered today more for her later roles in the title role of 1938's "Marie Antoinette" and as the virtuous center of 1939's "The Women", Shearer plays Jerry Martin, the blazing center of "The Divorcée" in which she plays a carefree young wife who cheats on her husband after he carelessly cheats on her. Instead of treating her in "Scarlet Letter" fashion, the film takes a refreshing look at the double standards between men and women when it comes to adultery. Naturally, they eventually regret their behavior but not before a lot of alcohol-fueled hell-raising with their fair-weather friends.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"An overtone of sarcasm"
Steffi_P26 January 2012
The dramas of the early sound era were often awkward, phoney-looking things. A lot of this has to do with the acting. Most actors were of course experienced in silent cinema, but a lot of players with stage experience had also been brought in as was deemed appropriate for "talkies". Silent screen acting tended to be over-the-top so that meaning could be expressed without words, and stage acting also tended to be over-the-top so that meaning could be expressed to people sitting in the back row. But this excessive style didn't really work in the more authentic setting of sound cinema. Of course, movie people weren't stupid; they were aware of what did and didn't work and the industry adapted quicker than is sometimes thought.

And of course, there were some actors and actresses who simply seemed to get the hang of it straight away. Norma Shearer was among a small number who survived the transition from silents to talkies with her career completely intact. One thing Shearer had was a remarkable presence – she's able to project herself with just a simple gesture or pose, and in The Divorcée she's often standing with her shoulders slightly forward in understated aggression. And within this context she is able to give a restrained performance, conveying a great deal but with a degree of credibility that makes the drama seem more believable. Shearer deservedly won the Academy Award for her work here. Compare her to previous year's winner Mary Pickford in Coquette, a slice of ham from a bygone era, and you can see how much things have changed.

Let's also take a look at the director Robert Z. Leonard. He's not too well remembered these days because he isn't deemed an auteur, but at the time he was among the forefront of Hollywood professionals. Two things in particular are worth noting about his style in The Divorcée. First is that he uses a lot of camera movement to really engage us in a scene (who says early sound films were static?), often using a noteworthy pan as a character appears. Secondly, he gives us an awful lot of the interplay between characters in simple wordless glances between them, for example the jealous look of Conrad Nagel when Shearer and Chester Morris announce their betrothal, or later a silent, spiteful exchange between Shearer and Mary Doran. There was a temptation for talkie directors to shoot things before the assembled actors as if for a stage play, but here Leonard is making subtle close-ups that cut across the action, and in so doing giving depth to the story outside of the dialogue.

This picture is now often classified as a "pre-code" movie for its depiction of Shearer's promiscuity after she becomes the titular divorcée, although even by the standards of the day it's pretty tame. However, thanks to its fluid direction and naturalistic acting, it is nevertheless a movie that seems a few steps ahead of its time, and points towards the increasingly sophisticated sound cinema of the 1930s.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Still Worth Seeing
boblipton7 March 2023
Norma Shearer and Chester Morris are wed. For three years they are blissfully happy, until Miss Shearer discovers he has strayed. So she strays too, "balancing the accounts". So he divorces her.

It's clear to me that Miss Shearer's Oscar win for Best Actress in this role was at least partially political. She was, after all, married to Irving Thalberg Don't mistake me: I think she's good, very good, but with the still poor sound system at MGM -- supervised by her brother -- she struggles to make her sides in anything less than a declamatory manner. She does look great and is a fine movie actress. However, I would have given the award to Ruth Chatterton for SARAH AND SON.

In any case, this is certainly a well produced movie for 1929, with a fine cast, and Robert Z. Leonard, one of my favorite unregarded directors in charge of the shoot. It addresses seriously, if not in great depth, issues of marriage and how seriously people take their marriage vows. Does it still have something to say to a modern viewer. I think so.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If you were watching this live on stage it would be brilliant!
1930s_Time_Machine11 April 2023
In 1929/1930 a few directors such as Rouben Mamoulian etc. Made pictures which are comparable with whatever is being made today. APPLAUSE (1929) for example is as fresh and watchable now as it was when it was made. You can enjoy these rarities as movies, not just as weirdly acted interesting period pieces demonstrating the uneasy transition from silents to talkies. THE DIVORCÉE is not one of those rarities. In terms of production it's fine, in fact better than fine. The imposition of sound did not handicap director Robert Leonard's flair for innovative photography, fluidity and energy one iota - visually, this film is as sumptuous and professional as anything from the late silent era. It's definitely not one of those atrocious early talkies where the actors remain stationary slowly enunciating their lines in turn into a bunch of flowers. No, this actually looks really good - after all its star is the wife of Mr MGM himself so they weren't going to put her in anything shoddy!

What "spoils" this is the acting. It's not bad acting - on the contrary, it's very good but it's 'theatrical acting' not 'talking pictures' acting. A year later in 1931 most film actors had learned to speak as though they're speaking to each other rather than to the back row of an auditorium but this picture it's definitely old school. This presents a huge massive hurdle to watching this just as a piece of entertainment.

I am pretty sure that anyone who watches this will only be doing so if they are interested in the evolution of motion pictures. It is however fascinating how it reflects the attitudes of the late 20s - that popular misconception that the late twenties was populated entirely by sexually liberated flappers is shown here as being as realistic as everyone in the late sixties being hippies. Norma Shearer's character is 'modern' for the time but the condemnation for her perceived sexual immorality and misogynistic hypocrisy is Victorian. Even watching this today makes you angry and of course only a well-made film can affect your emotions but it's that stagey feel and theatrical delivery is such a barrier to being able to watch this just as a film. Another problem is that everyone has that same annoying made-up-for-the-theatre 'mid-Atlantic' accent, they all dress the same and all have the same hairstyle - it makes it difficult to follow who is who.

Just a year later Norma Shearer made A FREE SOUL - what a difference a year makes! I would suggest that if anyone is wanting to discover who 'The Queen of MGM' was they should watch that instead because unlike this one, that looks like, feels like and sounds like a proper movie and is surprisingly engaging film. Her character in that and indeed the story is not too dissimilar to Jeri in this but whereas in THE DIVORCÉE you're watching a good actress, in A FREE SOUL you're watching a real person. One thing she does in both films (but more so in A FREE SOUL) is demonstrate what a brilliant actress she was because although she's certainly no beauty (some may say 'plain') when you're watching her, she makes you feel that you're looking at an incredibly seductive, absolutely jaw-droppingly attractive woman.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Norma Shearer's Oscar winning performance!
Pat-5422 September 1998
Not only did Norma Shearer win an Academy Award for her performance, but the film itself was nominated for best picture of that year. Not "politically correct" by today's standards, Shearer still is defiant when she learns that her husband has been untrue and fights the "double standard" of morality codes between men and women.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Paying back with same coin, but in very expensive way....
elo-equipamentos23 January 2018
On the thirties had a lot of productions like that maybe for transition over silent to talkies movies, they grasping the opportunity to offer more dialogues which weren't able on silent movies, but somehow it were enough as can proves this picture, there's no soul, just a silly drama, very usual, Just Norma Shearer is worthy to see, all cast are moving around her, Morris is a UGLY actor with a flattened nose....

Resume:

First watch: 2018 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
i enjoyed it
HandsomeBen22 February 2022
I enjoyed it for what it was. The beginning irritated me because everyone seemed over the top and giddy, even for a movie in the 30s. It was really laying it on thick. The acting got a lot better once the drama started, and so did the story. I went into this not knowing what this was about, so the first 15 minutes really threw me off, and I didn't like it. It does get better as it goes along.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed