Laughter (1930) Poster

(1930)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
It's hard to laugh if you're hungry...
AlsExGal13 November 2010
... or make a wise decision concerning your future for that matter. The life of ex-chorus girl Peggy (Nancy Carroll) now socialite wife to public utilities king C. Morton Gibson (Frank Morgan) seems to be an object lesson in this fact. Peggy is already a millionaire's wife by the time the film opens, so we don't see any of her past life, just the human remnants of it. First there's Ralph, an overwrought starving artist who is obsessed with memories of Peggy but whom Peggy never apparently loved. Next there's Paul Lockridge (Fredric March), starving musician, whom Peggy did love but was overseas at the time she made the decision to marry Gibson, and thus could not plead his case.

Peggy doesn't have to worry about being hungry anymore, in fact she doesn't have to worry about anything in her new life. However, her husband treats her like a cross between a bird in a gilded cage and a welfare case, always talking about her "unfortunate past" and scrutinizing her every unexplained absence. Neither is he a particularly passionate fellow - accumulating more and more cash is his real passion. The lack of joy in Peggy's life comes to the surface when Paul returns from Europe to win her back. His only asset - laughter, the joy of life lived experience by experience. Add to this a chance meeting of Peggy's unstable old suitor, Ralph, with Peggy's new stepdaughter, Marjorie, that turns romantic and complications abound.

This is a rather understated film, nothing is particularly laugh-out-loud funny or horribly suspenseful and melodramatic save for a couple of short scenes in each case. Thus the film's success largely rests on the acting of the performers, which is quite good. Since this film was made in 1930, many might think it is about the desperate decisions and trade-offs people had to make to keep eating during those times, but it really predates the depression.

This is a good one for fans of Nancy Carroll, who plays her understated role very well - that of a decent woman whose profession of chorus girl guarantees not only that she has just a few good years to make a decision on the only profession that could come afterwards for such women in the 1920's - marrying well, but that everyone automatically doubts her character because of her profession.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"You're rich, dirty rich. And only laughter can make you clean."
wmorrow598 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It hasn't received much critical attention, but Harry d'Arrast's comedy-drama Laughter is more than just an interesting and entertaining movie: it's a milestone in Hollywood's treatment of romantic comedy, a prototype for the "screwball" style produced several years before the term was in popular use. That's not to say that this film is as funny or wild as, for instance, Bringing Up Baby or Twentieth Century; despite its title, Laughter includes a lot of serious and surprisingly downbeat material, but it does point the way to the screwball genre in subject matter (i.e. the interplay of love and money) and tone, especially in one key sequence. It's also very well made for its time, and looks all the more impressive compared to other movies released in 1930, when the new technology of sound was still an impediment to smooth filmmaking technique for so many directors.

The story is focused on a young woman named Peggy (Nancy Carroll), a former Follies girl who has been married for a year to wealthy broker C. Morton Gibson (Frank Morgan). For a broker he seems like a fairly decent chap, but unfortunately he lacks any trace of humor or spontaneity. Morton never laughs and seldom even cracks a smile. The couple, who live in a fabulous Deco mansion filled with servants, never display any genuine warmth for each other, and barely seem to be acquainted. It's clear that in marrying this man Peggy made a calculated financial deal, trading her youth and vitality for the security of this man's wealth. It's also apparent that Peggy is still struggling to clean up some messy situations left over from her earlier life; in the opening sequence an emotionally unstable artist named Ralph (Glenn Anders) who believes he's in love with Peggy threatens to kill himself over her. Throughout the film there are several scenes set in Ralph's grungy studio, where low-down bluesy music always blares, and the contrast with Gibson's spotless, quiet mansion is striking.

Peggy's situation hits a crisis when a former suitor named Paul Lockridge (Fredric March) returns from Europe. Paul is a breezy, fun-loving composer who disapproves of Peggy's marriage and is determined to shake up her life, which he quickly succeeds in doing. March is terrific in this role. Viewers familiar with his later, more stately performances may be surprised at how energetic and loose he is here, like Cary Grant in his heyday. He makes himself at home in the Gibson mansion, rummaging around in the fridge, gnawing a chicken leg and washing it down with beer, and playing his tunes on the piano. (His rowdy playing is pointedly contrasted with Mr. Gibson's fussy plink-plink-plinking at the keyboard.) In the film's "screwball" highpoint, Peggy and Paul go for an afternoon ride out on Long Island. They run out of gas, get caught in the rain, and accommodate themselves by breaking into a house whose owners are away. What's notable about this sequence is the pair's playful attitude: they treat the whole thing as a lark. They decide that the place belongs to a couple named Smith and portray them, only Peggy is Mr. Smith and Paul is the Missus. They wrap themselves in bearskin rugs, and that's how we find them at breakfast the next morning. Unfortunately the runaway couple can't sustain the antic mood when reality crashes in on them. They're arrested, but when the identity of Peggy's husband is revealed they're quickly released and given a police escort home. That's when Paul informs Peggy that, for all her riches, what she lacks is laughter, and the lack of it is smothering her. "You were born for laughter," he tells her. "Nothing in this life of yours now is as important as that."

The attitude towards wealth is striking, considering that the Great Depression was the inescapable calamity of the era. Here we encounter an attitude that would be reiterated and refined in later screwball comedies, that is, Depression or no Depression, money is worthless if you're not happy with your life. (Of course, money comes in handy if you're starving, but that's a different debate for another time.) Peggy comes to realize that she'd rather gamble on uncertainty and "laughter" than settle for an embalmed existence under C. Morton Gibson's roof, and Nancy Carroll is so lively and convincing in the role we choose to believe her. Whenever I see one of Carroll's films I wonder why her career didn't flourish; in addition to being very pretty she was an actress of nuance and versatility. She and March are first-rate in Laughter, and so is Frank Morgan, in a sympathetic portrayal of an emotionally stunted man. Morgan gives a restrained, carefully calibrated performance entirely free of the blustery shtick that became his trademark later on. His C. Morton Gibson seems fully aware of his shallowness but unable to develop as a person, frustrated and angry but essentially masochistic in his unwillingness to take charge as events in his household spin out of control. We identify with Peggy & Paul and want to see them break away, but Gibson is a surprisingly poignant figure.

Laughter is a well-written, polished film that deserves to be better known. It's not in the same league as the later screwball classics when it comes to humor, but taken on its own terms it's an intelligent piece of work that deserves credit for its groundbreaking approach to romantic comedy.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Clearly a pre-code plot!
planktonrules25 December 2018
Up until July, 1934, the job of policing the films out of Hollywood was mostly left up to Hollywood. There was no rating system and practically anything might appear in movies. While not extremely common, nudity, adultery, abortion, homosexuality and promiscuity were featured in quite a few pictures...including in Biblical epics such as "Ben Hur" (1925) and "The Sign of the Cross". Often, when folks use the term 'pre-code' they are usually referring to the more extreme films of this era...and "Laughter" clearly is a pre-code plot, as its main theme is adultery.

When the film begins, you learn that Peggy (Nancy Carroll) has married a rich guy (Frank Morgan). But she also has had some admirers--including a suicidal artist and one lover (Frederic March) who stops by for a visit! Now Peggy must decide whether she wants to stay married to the rich man or run off with fun-loving Paul.

Post 1934, such plots clearly would NOT have been allowed until, perhaps, the 1960s. The notion of an old boyfriend showing up and the young wife going off with him to spend a day with him was just too broadminded for the post-code days...and hard to believe that the husband would just sit back and allow this outing to take place. It is, however, reasonably interesting to watch though not the comedy I expected (IMDB called it a comedy romance...but there were very few laughs). Worth your time...especially if you are a pre-code fan but not a fan I'd rush to see either.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wonderful Nancy Carroll
drednm17 January 2011
I watched LAUGHTER, a 1930 film starring Nancy Carroll and Fredric March. Many comments and reviews state this film as a forerunner of the 30s screwball comedy. Yes there were some screwball elements, such as the silly sequence when the stars, caught in the rain, break into a house and put on bear rugs while their clothes dry. There's also a terrific scene when March is playing piano when the butler (Leonard Carey) tries to correct him. They end up playing duets! There's also a nice party scene where Eric Blore shows up in an angel costume. Another standout scene is when the daughter (Diane Ellis) starts to jazz dance and is joined by Carroll while Frank Morgan sourly looks on. Also of interest is Pearl the maid, played by Ollie Burgoyne, who was better known as Olga Burgoyne, a dancer in many stage shows.

Still, I don't see this film as a comedy, let alone a screwball comedy. Carroll (she's very good) plays a former show girl who marries Morgan for his money. His daughter is only a little younger than Carroll. The daughter is a little wild; Carroll is a lot bored. She has everything in her life but "laughter." When she takes up with March, we know the marriage is doomed. So does everyone else.

Morgan's character hasn't an ounce of humor in him. There's also a tragic starving artist type (Glenn Anders) who gets involved with Ellis. It's with this character that any shred of comedy drains from the picture as doom settles over the storyline.

This is still a very good film with solid work from its stars.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
When I call you from Hell, I'll reverse the charges
AAdaSC30 December 2018
Ha ha. Nice line from Fredric March (Paul) who plays a musician who is in love with chorus girl Nancy Carroll (Peggy). However, she has married wealthy bore Frank Morgan (Mr Gibson). She has wealth but no laughter in her life which is what March returns to see her about. But there is also someone else on the scene - artist Glenn Anders (Ralph). This side of the story is pretty heavy-going and throws in some real drama to the proceedings.

The side story with Anders takes you down a route that you don't expect in a comedy but it has pivotal significance for the character of Nancy. The acting is good from all and March and Carroll have a good chemistry and carefree attitude which comes across well. There are several funny scenes, eg, when the two lovebirds break into a stranger's house, the piano sequence with March and the butler Leonard Carey and the spontaneous dancing from Carroll and Morgan's daughter Diane Ellis (Marjorie) to name a few. This was to be the last film made by Ellis who died at age 20 whilst on honeymoon in India.

Finally, I can't wait to start calling people from Hell.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Laughter
CinemaSerf16 February 2024
Harry D'Abbadie d'Arrast doesn't hang about with this tale of rags to riches that has loads of emotional baggage thrown in for good measure. "Peggy" (Nancy Carroll) is let down by her true love and takes the easy option by marrying the dull and staid millionaire "Gibson" (Frank Morgan) who guarantees her an easy, if uninteresting life. She's too restless a spirit for all of that, and although she resists the advances of the boyish and unstable sculptor "Ralph" (Glenn Anders) she is ready to jump ship when the carefree "Lockridge" (Fredric March) re-emerges into her life with a plan for her to escape her silk-clad drudgery and head for la Vie Parisienne - via some high jinx and a bit of burglary. Tempted, her life is thrown into turmoil by the daughter of her husband, "Marjorie" (Diane Ellis) who has a few designs of her own! This tries hard to straddle a few genres here, and whilst the dramatic aspects work well enough, the comedic ones prove a little beyond everyone to convincingly pull off. As the story progresses, even the usually reliable Morgan looks a little uncomfortable with the increasingly contrived nature of the plot within a plot within a plot. Also, by the end I'd rather concluded that "Peggy" was no great shakes as an human being either. The production could fairly be described as embryonic and the photography seemed framed at times as if to allow the actors to read cue cards off-set the cameras - that looked a bit squinty. Still, it's all quite light-hearted and enjoyably enough paced to pass ninety minutes effortlessly.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wonderful and delightful charming picture
cocoanut_grove1 September 2001
"Laughter" is a glorious romantic comedy with a terrific cast including that great man of the screen, Fredric March. It concerns a young woman who has married for stability and wealth, but can't forget the love of her life, played by the delicious Mr March. It was made at Paramount's Long Island studios, and some scenes were shot on location in New York, giving the movie a different "look" to many others of the period. Some people think of this movie as the first "Screwball" comedy. "Laughter" was Frank Morgan's first talkie and the last movie for Diane Ellis who plays his daughter. She died on her honeymoon in December 1930.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
See Fredric as a growling Polar Bear!
purplecrayon26 September 2002
I was expecting this movie to be much more than it was. I read that it was one of Fredric March's personal favorites, his others being A Star is Born, Death Takes a Holiday, and Best Years of Our Lives, and so since he liked it I thought it was going to be really good. I must say I was really bored with it. The story seemed boring and not really well written. I think it could have been a much better story if the script was better. As is, there were too many loose ends. Sure, there were some funny moments (it was enjoyable to see Fred draped in a white bearskin rug!), and Fred gave a few kisses, and you got to see him in his undershirt. But I have seen him in MUCH better roles, more romantic, more funny...everyone's opinion is different. This is mine...It is one of the few Fred movies I didn't really like.
9 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Seminal screwball comedy: funny, reflexive and only superficially dated
sunsetboulevard1631 March 2010
Harry D'Abbadie D'Arrast always complained that this movie, which he considered his best, was undeservedly forgotten, for it created many concepts which would reappear in comedies of later years.

This time he was right. It is surprising to find in such an early film the conflict between economical safeness and spiritual freedom that would later be typical of such wonderful films as Frank Capra's You Can't Take It with You, and very especially, George Cukor's Holiday (not a surprising coincidence, since it was written by the same screenwriter as Laughter).

It is an answer to the existentialism dilemma, where the only choices to make are living for the future (marrying a millionaire) or for the present (enjoying the moment you're currently living). Laughter goes even further than the later films, for it incorporates a third answer: suicide, which takes the story for the path of melodrama with a surprising respect of its unity.

In fact, what is most curious about Laughter is that it is much more mature that one would suspect. The structure of the story, the performances and even the humor feels fresher than those of other comedies of the period. A good example is the surprising scene in which Fredric March and Nancy Carroll do some role playing just for the sake of it: they pretend to be a marriage in which he is the woman and she is the man. They both imitate the conventions of each sex's supposedly proper behavior, making fun of predetermined attitudes and social obligations, clearly defending sponaneity and freedom as opposed to that which they parody/criticize (social roles conditioned by sexes).

Also the way the structure of the story is inventive enough, with a past time we never see but which is reflected in the present, and a triggering opening which serves as the conclusion of the movie as well. In fact, many other the elements of the movie (starting by the title itself) are developed in more than one level, like this one.

The biggest fault of the film is not in its final quarter (which, contrary to what I had read, seems to me fluid and coherent with the rest of the film): it is a number of technical limitations, which harm its rhythm for today's audience. These were common in the beginning of sound film (Lubitsch somehow avoided most of them in The Love Parade, made one year before this and quite a miracle).

The shortcoming I found most annoying was the impossibility for the camera to show the characters in a more frontal angle than the profiles during dialogs, which gives some important scenes a very old fashioned stagy feel.

(It had to do with the sound equipment: for what I know, they couldn't edit the sound they recorded, so they had to film each scene with several cameras so that they could use full takes of sound. So there could only be one light setup, and therefore, the characters had to be filmed from the only side where the light was better).

However, compared with most movies of that period, Laughter is a clear winner, and it is no wonder that March considered it one of his best films. His performance is relaxed, joyful and attractive still today, and so is Nancy Carroll's.

It is a pity that D'Arrast is not better known today, nor this movie properly restored/distributed. It is a interesting work on many levels, by a highly original and innovative filmmaker.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
There's a lady who's sure all that glitters is gold...
1930s_Time_Machine4 March 2023
...And she's buying a STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN

Not sure whether Led Zeppelin were inspired by this film but but the theme, or rather the song remains the same which is as Paul McCartney wrote: MONEY CAN'T BUY ME LOVE.

It's somewhat idealistic since that hippie dream of non-materialism probably grated a bit with the audience of 1930. The Great Depression had just started and millions of Americans were now forced into poverty and even starvation so maybe they didn't have a lot of sympathy for Nancy Carroll's millionaire character bemoaning lack of excitement in her privileged life.

Nancy Carroll plays Peggy, a former Zigfield girl who's achieved the classic chorus girl dream of marrying a millionaire. But it's a case of: 'be careful what you wish for' because despite the diamonds and the mansion, she's not cut out to be just a demure, subservient trophy wife and is still seeing a couple of men behind her husband's back. One has to be sorry for the husband - cheating on The Wizard of Oz just isn't right!

It's worth sticking with this - although it starts off a bit slow and 'arty' it quickly speeds up and evolves into a really absorbing, witty and enjoyable drama. You have to pinch yourself at times to remind you that this was made in 1930. The acting is perfect and natural - as far away from that awful static, stagey style common in those very early sound films as is imaginable. There's even a musical score, there's classy art-deco sets, there's realistic dialogue and unlike most films of this age, very fluid camerawork with innovative and imaginative tracking shots - it's like nothing you'd expect from 1930.

What makes this special is its director Harry d'Abbadie d'Arrast whose talent lives up to his cool name. Had a lesser director made this it could have become just the typical dross of 1930 but considering the limitations of film making at the dawn of the sound age, he works miracles. He truly brings the story and the characters to life and imbues it with wit, humour and humanity. He even brings honesty to the happy ending by tempering it with real life since as the song goes: And a new day will dawn for those who stand long and the forests will echo with laughter.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Moved me to tears
marcslope19 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Those describing this as an early screwball comedy are telling only half the story--it's also a romantic drama, and, more surprisingly, an existential meditation. The theme is, as noted, quite reminiscent of "Holiday" and the later "The Philadelphia Story"--love among the privileged, with interlopers from the less privileged, and the ability or lack thereof to have a sense of humor in high society. But it's quite sad, too -- Glenn Anders' character meets a sorry end, and that ruins Diane Ellis's life. What's really moving is watching Nancy Carroll, never more radiant, having to choose between security and her true self, and her interaction with Fredric March, unusually loose and spontaneous; their scene in the cab actually moved me to tears, both for its content and their playing of it. This is how it's done, folks. For a screwball prototype it has unusual depth of feeling. Add to that sumptuous Deco trimmings, technical prowess that belie its Astoria Studios origins, and some exciting location New York filming. Hard to catch a copy of this one, but it's worth the search.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nancy Needs Love and Laughter!!!
kidboots12 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Nancy Carroll was the first girl to reach stardom in the talkies, she was the first girl to sing a song into a movie microphone, she was the first girl to do a tap dance on a studio sound stage and she was the star of arguably the first sophisticated "screwball" comedy. "Laughter' was the first Nancy Carroll movie I ever saw (over 35 years ago) and I was disappointed - where was the Nancy I knew from photos in books about the early musicals, the dancing Nancy in feathers and silky costumes. Now, after seeing quite a few of her films, I realise she can do anything. Whether the part called for a chorus cutie ("Close Harmony", "Sweetie") emotional drama ("Dance of Life", "The Devil's Holiday") or scintilating comedy ("Laughter", "Springtime for Henry") she could do it all.

Peggy (Nancy Carroll), a Follies beauty forsakes all her old suitors to marry an affable old millionaire, C. Mortimer Gibson (Frank Morgan) who, while he lavishes every luxury on her, is obsessed with making money. One of her rejected suitors, Ralph La Sainte (Glenn Anders), a sculptor, has taken it very hard and when Peggy visits him, she finds him suicidal, but manages to jolly him around.

When Paul (Fredric March), yet another suitor, returns from Paris, where he went to forget, he is just as riotous and madcap as ever and Peggy finds it hard to resist his infectious good humor. She realises she is bored with a life of idle luxury and needs love and laughter but she now has an added responsibility, keeping her step daughter, Marjorie (Diane Ellis) on the straight and narrow as she is fresh off the boat from finishing school and wants to kick up her heels. In an effort to help her discover laughter again, Paul takes Peggy on a drive. This sequence with it's zany humor and quirky oneliners that ends in their dressing up in bear skins and chasing each other around an empty house shows the beginnings of the "screwball" genre. The day ends unhappily as police arrest them for housebreaking and Peggy has to put up with a heated lecture from her irate husband.

During a costume party, Peggy finds Marjorie missing and realising she may be running away with Ralph, who she is infatuated with, goes to his rooms to try and stop her. To bring Marjorie to her senses, she tells her that Ralph is only marrying her on the rebound and when Ralph stays silent, Marjorie flees from his rooms in tears. Peggy then realises her future is with Paul and that she needs love and laughter rather than luxuries. The very end scene has you wondering whether Paul's wit and charm will be enough to sustain Peggy as she looks longingly at a diamond bracelet.

It is great to see Fredric March in these early roles, he was very versatile. "Laughter" was Diane Ellis' last movie. She had been a sweet ingenue who may well have developed into a competent actress - who knows? she died mysteriously in India on her honeymoon.

Highly, Highly Recommended.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed