Outward Bound (1930) Poster

(1930)

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
How Will You Do Before The Great Examiner?
bkoganbing27 March 2008
The story of the man who wrote Outward Bound is probably more interesting than the play itself if that's possible. Sutton Vane was an actor who joined the army at the outbreak of World War I and was invalided out due to a bad case of shell-shock. The horrible memory of the war stayed with him even though he tried to go back to performing.

The play Outward Bound was written by Vane as a catharsis, his own message about how differently people view life at the moment of judgment. Vane could not interest any of the mainstream producers in London to back his play, he raised the money and produced it himself. It struck a chord with post World War I audiences in first the United Kingdom and then in America.

When Warner Brothers got the rights to the play they were lucky indeed to get several of the original cast from Broadway to repeat their roles for the screen. Leslie Howard, Lyonel Watts, Dudley Digges and Beryl Mercer did these parts on Broadway in 1924 when the play ran for 144 performances.

Several people find themselves on board a most mysterious ship which seems to be continually traveling in fog and only one crewman, a steward is on duty. It turns out that only a young couple, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., and Helen Chandler, seem to know what's happening. They're all dead and the ship is heading towards a meeting with the Great Examiner who will determine their fates.

Why they and steward Alec B. Francis are the only ones of the passengers that knows what's happening and what happens to each one you'll have to see the film for. Outward Bound with a message that's less Christian centered might very well find an audience today. Unless you believe that their are similar ships carrying people from an Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist, etc. cultures to their fates which the author by no means excludes.

Though melodramatic in spots, Outward Bound is still a haunting film about people on the brink of eternity.
30 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Before they start walking up the Stairway to Heaven, they must first meet the examiner!
mark.waltz5 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
There have been many theories of what comes during that transition from life to death, and in this first film version of the successful British play, it is an early variation of Albert Brooks' "Defending Your Life". Instead of one man comically defending his existence on that third rock from the sun, you get seven of them, all quite different, and all destined for immortalities that reflect the lives that they lead. There's the young couple in trouble who seem destined for a world in between life and death because of a double suicide, the young alcoholic afraid of facing his own immortality, the lonely char woman who gave up her child so he could have a better existence, a ruthless businessman who refuses to accept the fact that his earthly power can't be transfered further, and the snooty society matron who despises the idea of spending eternity with a husband she married for position and ultimately despised in spite of his undying love for her.

All of these people must face the judgment of the examiner, a raucous every man (played with great gusto by Dudley Digges), and to some, he will be their best friend, to others, their worst nightmare. He has no patience for fools, and that will not sit highly with the obnoxious Montagu Love or the uppity Allison Skipworth. Reverand Lyonel Watts is delighted to find that he's an old acquaintance, certain that past mistakes that got him ex-communicated will doom his soul, while young lovers Helen Chandler and Douglas Fairbanks Jr. fret over the examiner's refusal to talk to them. Cockney Beryl Mercer's destiny seems almost certain, her saint-like presence and love for a son she gave up clear in her desire to reach out to everybody around her. As for Leslie Howard, he is so insecure about past mistakes, he has no idea that all he has to do is want to repent in order to be saved.

Some biblical scholars may choke over the message of the film, but the script seems to utilize more theorizing from the life of Jesus Christ and his simple message of salvation than the more complex old testament. It basically tells you that all you need to do to make it past the examiner's judgment is to wish for your own salvation and it shall be granted. In the case of Love and Skipworth, their characters are not repentful at all, while the love of the two suicides is all it will take to redeem them. As fantasies go, it is sweetly written and filmed, and as supernatural films go, it is beautifully photographed with some images that may haunt you as you reflect on it after it is over.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Outward Bound vs. Between Two Worlds
1930s_Time_Machine13 December 2023
One film is a mesmerising surreal experience whereas the other is an unbelievable overacted ridiculous compilation of cliches. Surprisingly it's OUTWARD BOUND that's the better film.

Despite what some people have said, OUTWARD BOUND is nothing like a filmed stage play. It is hampered by being made using Warner's cumbersome restrictive Vitaphone system but apart from that it has a fantastically atmospheric almost dreamlike quality which is exactly what such a story needs.

BETWEEN TWO WORLDS' style is just wrong for this type of picture. Yes it's filmed better, the story and characters are more fully developed but by trying to make it realistic, normal and natural, the premise comes across as ridiculous. For this to work, it can't be realistic, it can only be credible within a mysterious dreamworld where everyone is acting really weirdly - like they do in the original.

The acting in the older film is purposefully strange - after all they've just discovered that they're dead. Considering that it was his first film, Leslie Howard is superb and strangely believable as the tortured, troubled soul. John Garfield playing the same role in the remake however seems to think he's in a New York gangster flick and his cynical 1940s hard-boiled reporter is one of the most clichéd performances I've ever seen. That's the other problem with the 'new' version: everyone is a stereotypical caricature. The baddies are over the top nasty, the lovers are sickeningly sweet and as for the 'comedy vicar'! Worst of all is Sara Allgood as a dear little old Irish lady - I feel sorry for Garfield - eternity in the fires of hell almost seem preferable to having to live with her for ever.

It's understandable why the story had to be changed for the remake. Attitudes had changed hugely since the 1920s so it would not have made sense for the 1940s young couple to kill themselves for the same reason as their earlier incarnations. Being made in the middle of the Second World War again influenced that film's mood. Death then was a familiar visitor to us then so one can understand the over sentimental approach which was particularly appealing to a war ravaged world.

Although OUTWARD BOUND is more interesting with its moody, slightly stoned feel, the somewhat hammy remake has one significant advantage - the perpetually lacklustre Helen Chandler is replaced by Eleanor Parker. Not only is she a million times better as an actress, she is stunningly beautiful and a pretty face really does make an imperfect film more watchable.

The theme of ferrying the dead through the final judgment to the afterlife was actually done much better in the excellent BBC tv show, LIFE ON MARS / ASHES TO ASHES but nevertheless it's fascinating to see how such a theme was presented in the past.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Early Talkie
Bucs196010 January 2002
After seeing "Between Two Worlds" the 1944 remake of this movie, it is safe to say that both have their own merits. This film, made early in the talkie era reflects the effects of transitioning to sound from silents. The acting is stagey, overdone and very overdramatic. The players seems ill at ease probably due to the presence of the microphone and also from the fact that some were stage actors where the exaggerated gesture was appropriate. The story, adapted from the stage play, looks like what it is....a stage play. But the cinematography is wonderful, light and dark clearly deliniated; shadows which give it a very eerie look. It has such a great story line....passengers on a ship going to Heaven or Hell without their knowledge....that it holds interest in spite of some of the emoting that takes place. Leslie Howard goes over the edge in the scene where he realizes what is happening and it borders on comedic. Frankly, he is just not very good in this part. John Garfield plays in much more realistically in the 1944 film. Montagu Love, as the business man of shady reputation can't hold a candle to the wonderful George Colouris who played that part in the remake. The less said about Doug Jr. and Helen Chandler as the young lovers the better. One has to remember that this is a very early movie and those of us who love early cinema are prepared for the mannered acting that was often seen during this time in movie history. It is worth seeing; in fact, see this one and then see the remake. You might like the remake better but give the original a chance. You may like it.
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Obvious but fascinating allegory
gridoon202424 February 2018
Although modern audiences will probably guess what is happening before the characters on the screen do, "Outward Bound" is still a pioneering film thematically, in the way it bends and breaks the reality of what we are seeing. Leslie Howard is a little too theatrical in his talkie debut, but Dudley Digges scores points by playing the Examiner in a quite unorthodox way. An intriguing movie from start to finish. *** out of 4.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dated early talkie
blanche-229 March 2008
The chirons at the beginning of 1930's "Outward Bound" tell us in aching detail how Sutton Vane's play took the London stage by storm. It subsequently was done on Broadway not once but twice (the second time was some years after this film), and the film uses three of the play's original cast: Leslie Howard, Beryl Mercer and Dudley Digges. The film was remade in 1944 as "Between Two Worlds" and the plot was changed slightly to reflect World War II.

"Outward Bound" is the story of several people on board ship, but none of them knows the reason for being there or where they're going. Finally they figure out that they are all dead and face the judgment of The Examiner (Digges) who arrives to tell them their fate. Heaven and hell are really the same place, it turns out, and those going to the less desirable place merely have some things to work on before heading upward. Two people, however, will not be leaving the ship - that's the suicide couple (Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and Helen Chandler) who, like the purser, are "halfways" and must stay on the ship for eternity.

The film is very bizarre looking, in a good way, very foggy, with an amorphous skyline when the outside of the ship (a toy boat) is shown. The atmosphere is appropriately dark and eerie. The problem with "Outward Bound" is two-fold. The acting is melodramatic and very stagy; also, the actors don't have the talkie "rhythm" down yet, so they sound very stilted. Leslie Howard, who in the film takes the part played on stage by Alfred Lunt, gives no indication that he will become a great film star - his performance is for the stage and terribly hammy. Interestingly, both he and Fairbanks Jr. not long after this movie would give wonderful performances, Howard in "The Petrified Forest" and Fairbanks in "Love is a Racket." Fairbanks in particular had a remarkably modern acting technique, but not in "Outward Bound." Strangely enough, as with "Between Two Worlds," there is something compelling and sympathetic about most of these characters. Perhaps it's a fascination we have with the afterlife, but the story does hold together, and we do care what happens to the "good guys" on the ship. I admit to liking "Between Two Worlds" better, especially the suicide couple plot, which is better handled in the latter film.

"Outward Bound" today is an interesting artifact but worth seeing, especially if you can follow it up with "Between Two Worlds."
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
obvious reveal
SnoopyStyle26 November 2023
Tom Prior (Leslie Howard) is a heavy drinker and doesn't recall his previous night. Henry (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) and Ann (Helen Chandler) are a couple with dark plans. Rev. William Duke asks Mrs. Cliveden-Banks about the date. She is uncertain and insulted by the question. Mrs. Midget doesn't know where she is. They and other confused passengers are onboard a ship enclosed by permanent fog. Slowly, they realize the truth of the situation.

This is a pre-Code based on a play. There has been other remakes. The premise is an old one and has been used as foundational material for stories. Nowadays, the audience would suspect the big reveal right from the start. I do wonder if the audience of its day would be so quick. In the end, that's the only card up its sleeve. The movie has no other cards to play. The characters stumble around with the suspicion that none of their actions matter. That keeps the tension down. It's a slow boat to nowhere fast.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Play's Filmed Afterlife Remains Stagebound
Cineanalyst25 July 2018
One should probably view "Outward Bound" before reading reviews of it, because unlike its remake, "Between Two Worlds" (1944), it does withhold its premise for a brief period. These films would've been better, too, had they not resolved themselves as bluntly as a sermon. The best part of this adaptation is that it has some foggy and dreamlike atmosphere that's eerie at first, with passengers on a ship seemingly confused and suffering memory loss, which almost lifts this project from its origins as a stage play. The aged speckling and occasional audio deterioration on the surviving print I saw on the Turner Classic Movies TV channel may even add to this.

The staginess is announced from the beginning with three unnecessary and long-winded title cards describing the play's success. Additionally, as the filmed play unfolds, with its confined settings and plentiful dialogue, the limitations of "Outward Bound" being an early talkie become more apparent. What editing there is contains poor match cuts and even one or more jump cuts. The 1944 remake does a bit better with a brisker pacing, more camera movement and a musical score, but still largely succumbs to looking like a filmed play, as well. By the end of "Outward Bound," the camera lingers, static, on the actors, as they do all the work. I counted at least three shots that each last nearly two to three minutes each. Approximately, the film's overall average shot length is a languid 12.8 seconds by my count. "Between Two Worlds," by contrast, is only about 9 seconds on average despite containing several moving long takes.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Disquieting and Eerie Early-Talkie.
joeym428872 July 2004
A group of assorted persons find themselves on a ship bound for no conceivable destination. Little do they know, that they are all dead and sailing towards judgment in this evocative and moving psychological drama about life and death.

The script-which was based off a broadway play-is very well done. The final results are still stagey and the whole movie seems to take place in one room, but because of the brisk pace and timeless themes of life, death, and what happens after you die there is never a dull or slow moment in the movie. It's dramatization of life after death is mesmerizing and still holds up after all these years. This is Leslie Howard's (Gone with the Wind) first American film, he acted in the stage version of this film, so his acting tends to be on the melodramatic side. Of the young couple, Helen Chandler (Dracula) gives the better performance. Douglas Fairbanks Jr. brings down Chandler's tragic intensity and the young couple story line with his over-the-top performance. As for the rest of the cast, some performances are better than others, but no performance gets too melodramatic to the point where it's distracting from the great story or the eerie, almost scary, atmosphere. I saw this movie on TCM recently and I noticed that it is not available on DVD or VHS and I think that's a real shame. Overall: a very thought-provoking, atmospheric, early-talkie drama. Would be great for rainy days. Beryl Mercer (Public Enemy), Lyonal Watts, Alison Akipworth, and Slec B. Francis also star.

*** out of ****
45 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fairbanks Called it a "Prestige Picture" and He Was Right
gengar8436 November 2021
THE STORY & GENRE -- Afterlife judgment on ocean liner. Douglas Fairbanks Jr, Leslie Howard star.

THE VERDICT -- Endearing. A great sentimentality here for the dust of an earlier age. Is BETWEEN TWO WORLDS (1944) better? Yes, by a step or so, but I've seen OUTWARD BOUND a couple of times and I'm never disappointed. Solid 7.5.

FREE ONLINE -- Yes, crackly, from a TCM broadcast, the full 83 minutes, is common. The Library of Congress holds a print in preservation, though I'm not sure if it's any better.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A fascinating play,but this early talkie version shows its age
critic-227 April 2000
Many years ago, I happened to catch a 1944 film called "Between Two Worlds" on television. Knowing that this was a remake of the seldom shown "Outward Bound", I was eager to see it,and I wasn't disappointed. Unfortunately, I have seen that version only once, but I do remember that the plot was striking and that Sydney Greenstreet, in a rare sympathetic role, was utterly memorable and just about stole the film.

Just this past Monday, I managed to finally see the original "Outward Bound". It turns out to be a beautifully photographed (by the great Hal Mohr) film with a striking use of light to create both an eerie effect and,at one point, a breathtaking otherworldly effect, something that Mohr would later win an Oscar for in the 1935 "A Midsummer Night's Dream".

As for the script, it is by far the best-written, most eloquent dialogue I have ever heard in an early talkie, rising very nearly to the level of poetry at times.The sound quality of the print that I saw(on TCM) was also quite good, with every word clearly intelligible.

But what unfortunately, and perhaps unavoidably, ages this movie, is the acting. Some of it (from Alison Skipworth) is quite good, and Leslie Howard, as Tom Prior, is excellent, as long as he is being a charming rogue.

But, the minute the plot starts to gain in intensity, his performance starts to fall apart and become unintentionally funny (something I definitely don't remember happening in "Between Two Worlds", where John Garfield played Tom Prior). There is a climactic moment, at which Howard finally guesses the secret of the voyage, when we can almost sense a first-act curtain descending, because of the way that Howard delivers his lines and the fact that the camera lingers on him several seconds as he stands frozen, a demented, uninentionally hilarious, pop-eyed expression on his face.

Other actors are also hammy, though they don't all reach the level that Howard does when he goes momentarily berserk. The lovers, played by Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and Helen Chandler, are actually worse, almost always wildly overacting, and Leslie Howard looks restrained compared to them. Montagu Love overdoes his pompous business tycoon,but he never quite gets to the point of being unbearable--he is actually supposed to be rather aggravating. Alec B.Francis is stilted and unremarkable as the ship's steward,and totally devoid of personality in comparison to the actor who would play his role in "Between Two Worlds"--Edmund Gwenn (Santa Claus himself in "Miracle on 34th Street").

The little-known Lyonel Watts is nearly unbearably unctuous and even whiny as a defrocked priest. But Dudley Digges, another member of the original cast, is quite good in the stern and mysterious role of Thompson,the Examiner--he seems to be one of the few early film actors who understood that acting for film and live theatre are different.

The film's direction has all the staginess of an early talkie---only a few imaginative camera movements, but those eerie lighting effects would have been difficult to duplicate on a stage in that era. There is no music except for the opening and closing credits, and this also dates the film, although it adds to the spooky atmosphere.

"Outward Bound" is certainly worth checking out, but despite what Leonard Maltin says, it is an unfortunately dated film, and its remake,"Between Two Worlds" seems more preferable.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Stagy But Engrossing
drednm200412 July 2004
Massive stage hit was an early talkie starring Leslie Howard as a man who finds himself on a ship that is "outward bound." Stunning dialog and beautiful cinematography help this allegorical tale of passengers stranded onboard a mysterious ship. A huge stage hit in London and New York, Outward Bound was am ambitious talkie for 1930 and features some wonderful performances (a bit stagy, but wonderful) from Howard as well as the great and underrated Alison Skipworth. Also good are Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Beryl Mercer, Helen Chandler, Alec P. Francis, Dudley Digges, and Montagu Love. Lyonel Watts is a bit much as the vicar. This was remade in the late 40s as Between Two Worlds, starring John Garfield and Eleanor Parker.

Leslie Howard always seemed to be wasted in blah film roles and its nice to see him here in a worthy role. And Skipworth is a total delight in any film you can catch her in...... Here she plays a most unusual part, and plays it beautifully. All her little hmmms and gutteral sounds add fathoms to the dialog. And note her first name is misspelled in the opening credits.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stage-bound
AAdaSC23 December 2018
Douglas Fairbanks Jr (Henry) and Helen Chandler (Ann) are young lovers who enter into a pact and carry it out at midnight. We then find ourselves on board a ship with Fairbanks, Chandler, a ship steward Alec B. Francis (Scrubby) and a few others. And no-one else. The ship steward is the only crew member and no-one seems to recall what the purpose of their journey is. It is up to the "Examiner" as played by Dudley Digges to help them on their way to the next part of their journey. He boards the vessel about halfway through the film by which time the passengers have realized what is going on.

The film has a good story but the remake "Between Two Worlds" (1944) is better. The portrayal of all the characters is acted more convincingly in the remake. It's not that they are bad in this film but they are way more over-dramatic in some instances and this gives the film a comic effect rather than a dramatic one. Fairbanks and Chandler are pretty bad come to think of it. It's an interesting film to watch if you have seen the remake but if you haven't, get yourself a copy of "Between two Worlds" - it's a better film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another film from the '30s that was later turned into a much finer remake...
Doylenf27 March 2008
OUTWARD BOUND suffers from stage-itis (if there IS such a word), and from early sound techniques which permitted no background music except for the opening and closing titles. Furthermore, all of the actors have been directed in what can only be called melodramatic stage technique, so that every line uttered sounds like a stage line.

Even the great LESLIE HOWARD is given to overacting of the worst kind. DOUGLAS FAIRBANKS, JR., too, has obviously been directed to play his role in earnest but over-the-top silent screen technique as the young man who dearly loves his mate and wants desperately to have her come back to him when he's given the chance to return to life. HELEN CHANDLER is sincere and just as earnest, but she too is unable to overcome the trite lines that have her repeating her husband's name so frequently for the final scenes that it becomes a distracting bore.

Missing, of course, is the polished script and the brilliant music of Erich Wolfgang Korngold that made the 1944 version (BETWEEN TWO WORLDS) so dramatically effective. Sorely missed is Sydney Greenstreet as The Examiner and John Garfield, Paul Henried and Eleanor Parker doing fine work in unusual roles.

Summing up: For a more intelligent and moving version, you can't afford to miss BETWEEN TWO WORLDS.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Drama
Michael_Elliott9 April 2008
Outward Bound (1930)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and Helen Chandler play lovers who commit suicide and then find themselves on an ocean liner with various other characters. None of them are quite sure where the boat is going but soon they learn that they're all dead and heading to Heaven or Hell. This film was based on a well known play, which was suppose to have been very good but it doesn't translate to the screen very well. The film opens up with over a minute of notes from the studio asking people not to laugh at the story and to take it seriously so you have to wonder if the studio itself was worried about the movie. The film is all dialogue, which naturally could kill the film and it partially does. The dialogue whenever the characters are just sitting around talking about typical things is quite boring and doesn't contain anything interesting. Whenever the people are talking about life and death then it comes to life somewhat but the film eventually goes on way too long. There are a few nice twists at the end but the actual ending is a letdown but I'm not sure if it was changed from the original play. Fairbanks Jr., and Chandler deliver fine performances as does the rest of the cast including Leslie Howard as a drunk. The film was later remade as Between Two Worlds with John Garfield.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Early Twilight Zone scenario before the Twilight Zone became a ting
jordondave-280856 October 2023
(1930) Outward Bound DRAMA/ MYSTERY/ FANTASY

Adapted from the play by Sutton Vane, unbeknownst and oblivious young couple of Henry (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) and Ann (Helen Chandler) are the new passengers of a free ocean liner cruise, unexpected why much of the passengers are eccentric. Before Rod Serling's 'Twilight Zone', movies such as this was on, except that it's a film about humanity without much suspense. A remake was made almost 15 years later called "Between Two Worlds". The revelation or mystery regarding the status of much of the passengers is subtle and fascinating to say the least.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Stunning Film
Maleejandra18 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
We watch as several different passengers board and wander about the decks of a ship. The exterior is covered in fog and the characters are confused about how they got on board or where they are going. The whole place is shrouded in mystery, but we slowly learn that all of them are dead and are sailing to their judgment. Henry (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) and Ann (Helen Chandler) are a married couple determined to stay together. Tom Prior (Leslie Howard) is a bit of a drunk, but an astute and generous man. Mrs. Midget (Beryl Mercer) is an elderly woman from the slums who is snubbed by many of the passengers. Most of the wealthy people are selfish and snobby (Montagu Love, Alison Skipworth).

The dialogue is almost as enchanting as the setting and the actors really bring their characters to life. Most notable is Howard who appears here in his first feature film. He seems well suited to film although his lyricism certainly stems from his experience on the stage. Chandler and Fairbanks are a bit less natural but their story is interesting and heartbreaking. What is great about this movie is that although we know a big twist from the start, the fact that the passengers are dead, it is not without surprises. The ending throws several unexpected wrenches that further liven the story. Do not miss this one.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Extremely stagy early talkie
jaynashvil18 July 2012
I stumbled across this film on Turner knowing nothing about the plot, so I didn't know where it was heading. (I'm fascinated by the early talkies, good or bad.) Unfortunately, I found this one very slow going. Like so many films of this era, everyone stands around and talks and then talks some more, and they do it in a scenery-chewing style that reminds me of the spoofs on "The Carol Burnett Show." The overplaying is combined with some very slow pacing and a script that repeats everything in case you missed it the first three times it was said. Leslie Howard's character, in particular, raves excessively about their fate as the other passengers repeatedly scoff at him. We get the point, already. Yes, I know this is Howard's first film, but I didn't believe for a second that he was panicked. His histrionics seemed very insincere to me, especially in the scene when he lunges at the reverend; Howard seems as limp as a wet towel, waving his arms in the general direction of the pastor. Regarding the cinematography, there are some very nice shots here and there, but mostly it's shot in the three-camera sitcom style with players occasionally walking in front of the person talking and unintentionally blocking them from view. By this time, they really could do a better job if the director has stepped up to the plate.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fine beyond compare
njlionstorm26 July 2003
The cast's dramatic performance style reflects that of serious stage dramas of the time. Over all, the feel of this movie is very "English" when compared to the crudely mannered World War II era remake.

I was swept up into the young couple's dilemma. The dramatic tension of this (the original) version, is so finely honed that I found myself sitting on the edge of my chair, nervously biting my nails, on the verge of tears. The 1930s was truly the golden age of movies.
33 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Do You Know Where You're Going To?
wes-connors25 June 2008
Somewhere near foggy London, Douglas Fairbanks Jr. (as Henry) and Helen Chandler (as Ann) solemnly prepare for a journey, by ship. On board, they encounter alcoholic Leslie Howard (as Tom Prior) and a handful of older passengers, who seem unclear about their destination. Eventually, their secrets unravel… With his superior British voice being well-suited for talking pictures, Mr. Howard begins an impressive Hollywood career. Howard was very successful in the stage version of "Outward Bound" (1924-25); he played "Henry", which is Fairbanks' movie role. Ms. Chandler reprised her "Ann" in a Broadway revival. And, Dudley Digges, Beryl Mercer, and Lyonel Watts all did their parts on Broadway. The movie version is interesting, but has not aged well; its success as a stage play is not incomprehensible.

***** Outward Bound (1930) Robert Milton ~ Leslie Howard, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Helen Chandler
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Slow Narrative Detracts From the Film's Spirituality
kidboots19 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The written prologue before the credits in "Outward Bound" asks the audience to cordially put themselves in the same position as the first night audience and believe the deep sincerity that Warners tried to bring to their talkie feature. Sutton Vane's eerie, allegorical stage melodrama about the destination of the human soul was certainly the most striking Broadway play of the 1924 season (144 performances) but it really polarized audiences of the time. When Warner Bros. bought it to the screen they retained Beryl Mercer, Dudley Digges, Lyonel Watts and in his film debut Leslie Howard, all from the original cast but even though the New York Times listed it as 6th best film of the year it was not a success.

The film starts out conventionally enough with young lovers Henry and Ann (Douglas Fairbanks Jnr. and the lovely Helen Chandler) planning to leave on a trip and worrying about what might happen to their dog, Laddie - the truth is they are planning to leave life itself.

They find themselves on a fog enshrouded boat along with a group of assorted passengers - alcoholic writer Tom Prior (Leslie Howard), a snobby dowager, Mrs. Cliveden-Banks (Alison Skipworth), a nervous priest (Lyonel Watts), a kindly charwoman, Mrs. Midget (Beryl Mercer) and a ruthless industrialist (Montague Love). They are all greeted by the steward, Scrubby (Alec B. Francis) but, oddly enough, none of them can remember their destination. Despite drinking heavily Prior soon sobers up to the fact that they are all lost souls on their way to Heaven - "and Hell too" Scrubby confirms his fears.

The first half is an extremely static movie that would be enjoyed a lot more by the viewer who knew nothing about the story. Prior spends a lot of time trying to convince the skeptical passengers of their true destination. The boat has no captain or crew or lights. The only lights are eerie rays that come from the cabin and light up the boat like a halo. The film brightens up a bit when "The Examiner" comes on board and Dudley Digges plays him as a weather beaten old rascal. All the passengers are to be interviewed by him to determine their placing (whether they go to Heaven or Hell). It definitely quickens the pace of the movie and there are no prizes for guessing where Skipworth and Love are bound for!!! The vicar and "The Examiner" are old friends and the latter is quick to reassure him that he will always have a job continuing on his missionary work helping the poor. Beryl Mercer's role is a real surprise packet and unlike other comments I have read I did not find her whiney!!! I thought she was one of the more humane characters in the movie. Funnily enough, Ann and Henry's names are not on the list - that is because they are "Half Ways" and cannot be judged. Because they are suicides they are destined, like Scrubby, to sail forever on the boat greeting new arrivals.

For many who saw it in 1930, the slow moving narrative and talkiness did not detract from the spirituality but today it definitely does not hold up that well. Helen Chandler was very popular in 1930, 1931. She had a quirky, little girl lost appeal, you couldn't mistake her uniqueness for any other actress. Even though her role was small, she convinced Hollywood that she was someone to watch out for in "Outward Bound" and she found her niche as the "new Lillian Gish". Unfortunately after a couple of years her movie heyday was finished and it was back to the stage.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very dated--this film actually needed the remake
planktonrules7 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER ALERT!!!!! To really discuss the movie adequately, it's practically impossible not to mention that the film is about the afterlife. A small number of people find themselves on a cruise ship and they have no idea where they are headed or why. After a while, it becomes obvious to one passenger that they are all dead but most won't believe him. In the end, they arrive and are judged and sent on to their respective destinations (though conceptually, it's nothing like traditional notions of the afterlife).

I am a huge opponent of movie remakes. In the 1930s and 40s, films were often remade--sometimes only a few years after the original film debuted. In practically every case, the remake was really unnecessary and did nothing to improve the original idea, so I am a huge fan of originals. However, to most rules, there are exceptions and OUTWARD BOUND is such a film. This original treatment of the play was a bit stagy but its main problem was the last third of the movie. All the characters who were to be judged weren't nearly as likable or unlikable as they were in the remake (BETWEEN TWO WORLDS) and their final judgment seemed rather anticlimactic and dull. After all that buildup, the conclusion seemed to fall very flat for many. In particular, the selfish society woman was a big disappointment--and her husband wasn't present for this big "comeuppance". While not as big a letdown, the nasty business man was also a letdown. About the only characters who weren't that different were Leslie Howard's (along with the lady who chose to go with him) and the couple who attempted suicide.

While an interesting idea, the film falters not just because of the lousy payoffs for several characters, but also because the film was so stark and cheesy (though some of this can be attributed to the fact that this was such an early Talkie). In particular, there is no incidental music (not completely unheard of in some 1930 films) and it all seems so flat and staged. Also, the ship models might just be the worst I have ever seen on film since the very early days of cinema--with obvious paintings and toy-like ships that wouldn't fool anyone.

So overall, not a particularly good film. A bit dull, a bit stagy, a bit cheap and a bit of a letdown. While I am not a huge fan of the later film, BETWEEN TWO WORLDS, it was a good film and was light-years better than this turgid film.
4 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worth Waiting For
januszlvii22 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Outward Bound is a film I have been wanting to see for many years. Why? I have seen the remake. Between Two Worlds and was curious to see how it compared to the remake. It is a movie that was worth waiting for ( I finally saw it online), but it is a rare original that is inferior to the remake. What makes the remake better? 1: Sydney Greenstreet as Thompson "The Examiner" is far superior to Dudley Digges. Why? A much more imposing character. 2: Eleanor Parker ( Ann) was a better actress then Helen Chandler, and it not even close. 3: Much more stagy then Between Two Worlds. My favorite characters here? The bad ones ( unlike Between Two Worlds where it was Thompson and Ann). The socialite Mrs. Cliveden-Banks ( Allison Skipworth ( an actress I generally do not care for). She was a nasty piece of work who "The Examiner" called "A bad harlot." She ended up getting hers being put in a castle all by herself. Close behind was. Mr. Lingley ( Montagu Love ( despite the last name of "Love" he usually played bad guys and ( or) arrogant characters) and here he was both. He was dishonest and never gave people a second chance and he too got his. The main character alcoholic Tom Prior here played by Leslie Howard and in the remake by John Garfield were very comparable as were his mother Mrs. Midget Beryl Mercer here and Sara Allgood in the remake. I give Outward Bound 8/10 stars. Not as good as the remake but certainly worth waiting for.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A bit disappointing
I have a hunge that the negative feeling has been emphasized by the rather long and elaborate text at the start. Either way, this movie as a whole jsut seems to be lacking all around. It's nice that the stage play did well and understandable that they would make a movie out of it, but the transition to movie screen is missing the actual transition. As said before, the text at the start doesn't help, because knowing the background it feels even more that you're jsut watching a stage play. The whole scenery shows only half the set and there isn't much movement. Furthermore, having everybody be addressed one by one doesn't help the flow of the movie much either. I don't know if we as viewers just found out the 'secret' too soon, but everything just feels very dragged out and lacks something exciting or something that would make you want to come back to this movie if you might stop watching somewhere in the middle.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Outward creakiness
TheLittleSongbird12 December 2019
Like has been said with film adaptations of stage plays, there has never been any bias against early talkies when films were transitioning from the silent era into sound. Just like there has also been no bias against very early films, actually love a lot of 30s-60s films and try to appreciate films of all decades and genres. 'Outward Bound' is based on an interesting play and stars Leslie Howard as a character that sounded ideal for him on paper and Douglas Fairbanks Jr.

'Outward Bound' didn't really work for me sadly, while just being a smidge above being a failure. It is definitely worth watching for curiosity value and is not an awful film. It just felt very static, very creaky, lacked momentum and even most of the cast are not on good form, which as one can tell from personal experience 'Outward Bound' was quite a difficult watch while still trying to appreciate it and judge it for its time and what it was aiming for.

There are certainly good things about 'Outward Bound'. Alison Skipworth and especially Dudley Digges (the latter being perhaps the best thing about the film and one of the few actors to not overact) give good performances. There is some nice acting from Howard early on.

Although the film didn't really blow me away visually, the costuming is elegant as is some of the eloquent dialogue.

However, on the most part 'Outward Bound' is visually quite static, with very basic photography that further adds to the over-claustrophobic feel. It is also rather creaky dramatically and has too much of an under-rehearsed filmed play quality, the badly sagging momentum and indifferent direction contributing heavily to that.

Some parts came over as repetitive and the over-wordy title cards weren't really needed. What majorly condemns 'Outward Bound' is most of the acting, with Skipworth and Digges being the exceptions. The worst offenders being Fairbanks Jr and Helen Chandler, both of whom but especially Chandler quite laughably bad, and sadly even Howard also gets far too melodramatic in the second half.

In summation, tried to take it for what it was but didn't do much for me. Sorry. 4/10
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed