User Reviews

I like the movie, for what it is. I would like to see the earlier version, and compare. I've always thought of Warner Oland as kind of a ham. But it's impossible to judge by 1931 standards in 2007, so what do I know? The Karlov question had me curious. This is what Wikipedia had to say (yeah, I know-- it's Wikipedia, so who knows if it's true?):

"In 1922 the book was made into a Broadway play and the following year a motion picture. A second film version appeared in 1931. It is said that a young Boris Karloff, who previously had a few uncredited film roles, chose his stage name for his first screen credit in 1920 from a Russian mad scientist character named "Boris Karlov" in this novel. The name 'Boris Karlov' was used from MacGrath's book for the 1922 Broadway play, but by 1923 with actor Boris Karloff using the similar sounding variation, the film version renamed the character, played by Wallace Beery, 'Gregor Karlov'. In the 1931 film version, however, with Warner Oland playing the character, the mad scientist's name is restored to 'Boris Karlov', less than a year before Frankenstein would make Boris Karloff a household word for generations. Ironically, Boris Karloff would play many mad scientists on screen, but never 'Boris Karlov'."

As a side note for those interested in original sources, the Harold MacGrath novel "Drums of Jeopardy" is available as a free e-text download at Project Gutenberg.

Warner Oland stars as Dr Boris Karloff, a man out to avenge his daughter's suicide by killing off a Russian noble family that he holds responsible for her death. Warner Oland soon after this movie became famous in his portrayal of Charlie Chan in a series of movies about a famous Chinese detective and the mysteries he solves. Clara Blandick, the future Auntie Em in the Wizard of Oz plays a great character in a supporting role and is excellent in bringing comic relief to this little known drama from 1931. I saw this movie on a DVD by Alpha video. The film does have some scratches and the sound has some problems during the opening credits. It's a short movie at 66 minutes but seems to be right for the pace of the movie. The Drums of Jeopardy is a decent movie. I would call it a murder drama. It's definitely dated though. You can sure tell you're in the 30s both by the dialogue, and situations. You really have to be a fan of older movies to get the most out of this film.

Since I don't know when this movie was made one can simply assume the name of the character that Warner "Charlie Chan" Oland plays was chosen simply by chance, but its true he does play Boris Karloff, er... Karlov.

The plot of this movie has Oland getting revenge one of the Russian Royal families for the death of his daughter. It seems that his daughter was in the Royal Ballet and was the lover of one of the princes who sent her away causing her to attempt suicide. Oland finds a piece of the crown jewels, a necklace called the Drums of Jeopardy, in her possession. In her weakened state she runs to warn her lover only to die in his arms moments before her father arrives and attempts to wipe out the family. He's sent to the gulag vowing revenge. Years later, after the family has been displaced by the revolution, they head to America where Oland begins sending drums from the necklace to the family members before killing them.(Legend says, if some one gets one of the separated drums, they will die with in 24 hours)

This is a great movie that is hampered by the fact that it now seems rather static.Its one of the movies from the early days of sound films, when there would be little music and long moments of silence that played fine then, but now seem to slow things down to a crawl. The first half of this film is dynamite and moves like the wind as we go from Russia to New York and out to the country in a breezy 30 or thirty five minutes. There's lots of action and complications. The trouble comes in the second half where the movie is locked in the country house and its surrounding area as the surviving members of the royal family wait for Oland's attack. Its not bad its just too slow compared to the first half.

I give it 7 out of ten over all, the first half scoring 9 and the second a 5, purely because it seems so slow after the first half.

Totally implausible/ridiculous but good fun. A pre-Charlie Chan Warner Oland, a Swede, is Russian this time. He's bent on revenge and hams it up all the way.

Neither Oland or the other Russian characters utter a word of Russian. The fleeing royals reach New York and bump into an ingenue and her peppery aunt who, of course, shelter the strangers in their country house. Wouldn't you?

The lights go out more than once. The phone is dead. A claw-like hand jumps out of the curtain to grab the girl. Stuff used a thousand times. The plot creaks and the print used for the DVD is battered, but you could do worse for an early talkie.

Mischa Auer lurks around in a pre-screwball role.

The Drums of Jeopardy (1931)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Mildly entertaining mix of melodrama, horror and thriller as Dr. Boris Karlov (Warner Oland) seeks vengeance against the noble family he blames for the death of his daughter. The "drums", of the title, refers to a mysterious necklace that the doctor steals and whoever gets a piece of it is officially warned that they're going to die next.

As far as "B" mystery-horror-thrillers go, THE DRUMS OF JEOPARDY isn't too bad but at the same time it's not all that good either. If you've seen enough of these types of films from the 1930's then you know that it seems they were being released weekly so you never quite know what you're going to get. Some of them feature nice budgets that allow their director's to do something with their weak screenplays whereas others have no effort behind them. This film is really split into two because it appears the first half was working on a decent budget and it almost feels as it was slashed because the second half of the picture takes away most of the action and instead features mostly dialogue scenes.

The first half of the film is without question the best because it gives us a great set-up and a pretty effective scene as the grieving father confronts his dying daughter and this is followed up with a scene where he witnesses her death and takes it out on the family. From here we're given a couple effective murders scenes including one where we just see the shadows of the killer's hand going towards the victim. With that said, the second half really gets dragged down due to some boring locations as well as some dialogue scenes that just really drag on without much excitement.

Oland, coming off playing Dr. FuManchu and a getting ready to take on a long Charlie Chan series, is in fine form, although, to be fair, this is the type of role that he could have played in his sleep. He's at least got enough energy to help carry the picture and a certain screen presence to help take the lower tier screenplay and bring it up a notch. The supporting cast isn't nearly in the same league and no one really stands out among them. THE DRUMS OF JEOPARDY isn't going to win any major awards and there are certainly much better thrillers out there but if you're a fan of the genre or Oland it's still worth watching.

This is another of the movies from 1931 that I never heard of until working through the list from Letterboxd. The concept of it was an interesting one and something that I've definitely seen more of as cinema goes on. Now the version I watched was 10 minutes shorter than the runtime listed on the Internet Movie Database. That is something I wanted to point out here. The synopsis though is a mad doctor is determined to take revenge on the family he believes responsible for his daughter's death.

For this movie, we start with a young woman in bed. Her name is Anya Karlov (Florence Lake). There is an older woman watching over her and praying for her to get better. Anya seems to be dying and is upset to learn that a letter was sent to her father. She wants this woman taking care of her to keep a secret to what happened to her. We also see she has this fancy necklace with jewels on it.

The letter then arrives to Dr. Boris Karlov (Warner Oland). He is upset and draws the attention of his assistant Peter (Mischa Auer). Dr. Karlov immediately heads to the home of his daughter. She is upset that he knows. This causes her to flee to the family she got the necklace from. Dr. Karlov knows whatever happened to her, it was caused by one of the children. The patriarch is General Petrov (George Fawcett). His brother is Prince Ivan (Ernest Hillard) and then there are his sons: Prince Nicholas (Lloyd Hughes) and Prince Gregor (Wallace MacDonald).

They are having a fancy dinner where General Petrov wants to show this famous necklace to a guest. It is one that has drums on it where the head of them are rubies. It was stolen from India and the lore behind it is that if you take the necklace apart, it is a bad omen if you send a piece to someone. Gregor is nervous when asked to get it and instead the general sends Nicholas. They are shocked to find out that it is missing. This is when Dr. Karlov and Anya show up. He vows that he will kill this family for what they've done to his daughter since he isn't sure who caused her to harm herself.

Dr. Karlov is then taken to Siberia, but word gets out that he's escaped. We read a letter that General Petrov has died after receiving a Drum of Jeopardy. The rest of this family flees on an ocean liner to America. The problem though, Dr. Karlov seems to be one step ahead of them and is picking them off one by one.

Here is where I'm going to leave my recap of the movie as it doesn't have the deepest story to it. What I found interesting is that this is a remake of another movie from the previous decade. I didn't see anything about it being based off a novel, which makes it more interesting as well.

Where I want to start though is with this necklace. I really like the idea of this cursed jewelry. The movie is interesting in painting both our heroes and villains as complicated characters. They have the ancestor that stole this necklace while in India. They refuse to give it back as well. I'm assuming the Petrovs are also from Russia, as they're also fleeing from the Bolsheviks. That is actually who killed General Petrov, but Dr. Karlov seems to be helping them as part of his revenge. This lore of the necklace though I thought was cool and a nice calling card as well.

As I was saying with the complicated characters, Prince Gregor was the lover of Anya. Since the version I watched is missing 10 minutes, I'm wondering if part of the back-story is missing there. From what I gather, Anya is a member of the ballet and tried to kill herself. I'm not sure if she was with child and he refuses to stay with her or he stops seeing her or what the exact reason is. Regardless, he did give her the necklace and that is how her father gets it. Nicholas is actually a pretty stand up guy who becomes our hero. There is also of course Dr. Karlov. I wish the movie would have given him a bit more back-story before he starts to kill the Petrovs. This feels like an early version of The Abominable Dr. Phibes. This is less creative of course and this movie also paints Dr. Karlov as the villain when he is avenging his daughter. Issues with the censors could be the reason there. It does look like this was still pre-Hayes Code though.

Since I've talked so much about the characters, I'll go to the acting next. I think that Oland is solid as Dr. Karlov. My issue with him is more of the writing. I do think he takes on this super smart character and portrays it well. He is steps ahead of everyone throughout most of it and it feels like Jigsaw could be borrowing from him here. June Collyer is good as Kitty Conover. She shows up when the Petrovs make it to America. She does fall into that troupe where she falls for Nicholas quickly, but I can work with it. Hughes is solid as our hero. Clara Blandick is funny as Kitty's mean old aunt Abbie Krantz. Hale Hamilton works as Martin Kent who is trying to stop Dr. Karlov. Aside from that I think MacDonald is good as the weasely brother and the rest of the cast rounds this out for what was needed for me.

Then I'll combine the last two elements here of the cinematography and soundtrack. For the former it is fine. The copy I was watching wasn't in great shape which is a shame. We also don't get a lot in the way of the effects, but it also is early cinema and not that type of movie. The soundtrack was fit for what was needed, but doesn't necessarily stand out either.

In conclusion here, I think that we get an interesting concept here with Dr. Karlov wanting revenge, the family not wanting to give up what happened and protecting their own. Also using this cursed necklace adds an element there. The acting helps to bring these characters to life. If I do have any issues, I think they needed a bit more fleshing out of some things for this to really work for me. Aside from that, I think the cinematography is fine and the soundtrack works for what was needed. Overall I'd say this is just over average for me though.

The movie starts very melodramatically, with a young woman in bed, tended by her mother, apparently dying. The reason for her deterioration is never stated, though it has to do with her relationship with some man. The acting here is poor. Her father (get this, his name is Boris Karlov, played by Warner Oland, acting like an evil Charlie Chan) enters, and demands the name of the man responsible, but his daughter refuses. A necklace, The Drums of Jeopardy, falls from under the bed covers, which he recognizes as belonging to the Petrovs, and vows revenge.

The movie and acting get better in the second act as the Petrovs come to America, fleeing the Bolshevik revolution. Karlov, working for the Bolsheviks, is in America already, and waiting for them. The Petrov sons escape Karlov twice, and flee to a country mansion on a dark and stormy night. Karlov and his goons are right behind.

This is an very 1930s movie with plot elements, and plot holes, typical of the period. The escaping Petrovs meet and are aided by a rich New York family. Karlov has a bullet-proof vest that defies Newton's third law of motion.

Clara Blandick, playing the matron of the New York family, shines while providing some humor.

THE DRUMS OF JEOPARDY is one of those fun little programmers that mixes a couple of genres to good effect. Overall it's a murder mystery with touches of horror in the form of Warner Oland's mad scientist antagonist, who has a vendetta against the family that he holds responsible for the death of his daughter. The first half of this creaker plays out as a political drama with plenty of sensation, while the second is more of a traditional old dark house movie with victims being bumped off one by one. Oland's character has the purely coincidental name of Dr Boris Karlov which only adds to the enjoyment.

Surely, it is not the best movie of the earlie talkies era. Nevertheless, The Drums of Jeopardy sets a fairly good pace since the beginning. Despite the mediocre script, the movie is enjoyable and keeps you entertained throughout its 65 minutes lenght. The players perform decently for the early 30's standards. I did get a few laughs from Clara Blandick's performance. I was, also, thrilled to see a character of a woman over 50 with a prominent role in a 1931 movie.