Springtime for Henry (1934) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Engaging
boblipton10 December 2019
Otto Kruger is trying to carry on an affair with Nancy Carroll, while her husband, Nigel Bruce, is trying to use it to blackmail Kruger into buying his carburetors for Kruger's auto company. In comes Heather Angel, who entrances Kruger. She is a proponent of the noble things in life, which inspires Kruger to give up conquest for virtue, and champagne for Postum.

It's one of the ambitious and symbol-infested movies that Jesse L. Lasky produced for Fox after he had been thrown out of Paramount. It's directed by Frank Tuttle as a pseudo-Lubitsch affair. As such, it is arch, coy, witty and frequently amusing. What it lacks, alas, is any depth or moments of inspired insanity. Kruger begins as an aging Lothario, calculating his campaign of seduction; his attempted reformation sounds childish, more than smitten. This seems to me to be a miscalculation that results in a close miss, rather than an accurate hit. It's not helped much by the dialogue and its direction, in which everyone sounds much alike and speaks in the same measured tone.

The two women are quite believable in their roles, as is Bruce, playing the same pompous nitwit that he specialized in. Kruger, however, is miscast. This was a problem with many of Lasky's productions during this period. He tried to use his leading men in roles that lay outside their usual range, and clearly demonstrated their abilities as actors, but also demonstrated they could not play these roles convincingly.

These miscalculations of production and casting keeps this from being a great movie. Despite these issues, it is filled with enough silly situations to keep it engaging throughout.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Farce but not fun or frenetic enough
loloandpete22 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A very important film for me, as a big Nigel Bruce fan. Bruce was in the original Broadway play of Springtime for Henry in 1931 and is the only cast member of that production to be cast in the film version, such was his success on stage in same. It set the template for his many appearances on screen as a lovable buffoon and set him off on the road to a very productive silver screen career as a character man and eventually principal player in the Sherlock Holmes films as Dr Watson opposite Basil Rathbone's Super sleuth. Back to the film version of 1934, one would think that the play would be opened out for film and this appears to be the case in that a cast of 4 become more than twice as many but belied by the fact that a three act farce, on stage, runs shy of 1 hour and fifteen minutes on screen. And it feels like a B movie. Bruce is by far the best thing in it and the screen is enlivened when he appears. Fellow principals Otto Kruger, Nancy Carroll and Heather Angel all have their moments and Herbert Mundin does a decent Job as a butler but for such a short piece it is rather muddled in the middle and lacks the frenetic pace a farce should have. The final scene is great fun but is rather too little, too late and considering the play had people rolling in the aisles and crying tears of laughter, it lacks belly laughs. Much of the humour of the last scene is of the blackly comic variety involving wife swapping, murder and an apparently strait laced character not being all she seems. But watch it for Bruce and a great last scene and if you don't set your hopes too high, you will get some enjoyment out of it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed