Within the Law (1939) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Nice Film
TheDuchessofM7 April 2010
Allow me to preface this review by stating that I've read the original source of this story (a play produced in 1912) as well as the 1930 Joan Crawford version, Paid. With this context, my review is equal parts a commentary on this movie alone and a commentary on an adaptation and remake.

I've grown to appreciate the talents of Ruth Hussey after tracking down her available films, and while I do see her as MGM originally saw her (a potential replacement for Rosalind Russell who was a potential replacement for Myrna Loy should either one get on Louis B. Mayer's bad side {as Myrna did when she went on strike after the success of The Thin Man for more money}), she more than proves herself capable of dependable acting and even great drama in the vein of Susan Hayward (too bad Hussey hadn't been born ten or fifteen years later) in Within the Law.

The plot is simple: shop-girl Mary Turner is falsely accused of theft from her place of employment and sentenced to three years in prison, vowing revenge on the man who sent her there--her employer. This version is much more brisk than Crawford's Pre-Code melodrama, which, as a Crawford vehicle, paid more attention to its star than the actual story. This is the result of the script for Hussey's version pulling the plot out of its stage-roots and casting an attractive and charismatic actor (Tom Neal) as Richard Gilder. Also, as amusing as Marie Prevost was, Rita Johnson's "Aggie Lynch" was suitably brazen and funny as the "Aggie Lynch" from the play. However, like Paid, Within the Law cannot escape its source material and I can see why the up-and-down drama of the last act can come across as stupid. The plot twists are very plausible and characteristic of 1912, but in 1930 or 1939, they are simply over the top.

But the acting is superb, even though I must admit that given a bit more of the MGM polish and a higher tier of actors and actresses, Within the Law could have been a perfect Myrna Loy vehicle (and I did see shades of Myrna in Ruth Hussey's performance). Though this is obviously a programmer and most likely a vehicle for testing audience reaction of Hussey, it is just as entertaining as MGM's "A" pictures of this period.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
maybe revenge isn't sweet
blanche-210 June 2005
This programmer, starring Ruth Hussey, concerns a woman, Mary, who, unjustly accused of stealing, vows revenge on her employer. While in prison, she studies law books and realizes that one can use the law to commit crimes and stay out of jail. She joins a team of con artists, of whom a prison friend, Agnes, is a member.

Mary's knowledge of legal cons is a boon to her friends, as it would be today if she had worked at Enron. It's the most interesting part of the movie. Life becomes a little more complicated for her when she sets out to use her boss' son as revenge.

This is an ordinary B movie. What's fun is that it was made in the 1938-1939 era when Gone with the Wind was all the rage. When Mary asks the prison librarian for a book, Gone with the Wind is suggested. Her friend Agnes refers to herself as Scarlett O'Hara. Guess everybody had it on the brain.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Godd start, bad end
samhill521526 October 2009
There's quite a bit to like in this movie in its first half. Ruth Hussey's portrayal of the downward spiral into a life of crime after being wrongly convicted is well done and believable. The plans she concocts for legally extorting large sums from her former employer are clever and add quite a few nail biting moments. Despite the film's pedigree I found myself expecting more and more clever twists. But in its windup the film becomes melodramatic and predictable. Love wins all, love sacrifices all, blah, blah, blah. Boring, boring, boring. The producers opted for a safe and bland conclusion when a more original ending would have raised this film to a much higher standing. Oh well, Ruth Hussey, Paul Kelly and Rita Johnson are all very good in their roles so I guess they make it worth a look.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ruth, Rita, and Tough Tom Neal
theognis-8082128 July 2023
When live theatre was popular, talented, young writers aspired to see their work on stage. In this adaptation, the tools of the dramatist are put to good use: reversals, rising and falling action, minor and major crises. Ruth Hussey plays a young woman working in a department store, accused of theft when stolen goods are found in her locker. Despite her protestations of innocence, the stern store owner insists on prosecution. During her three years in prison, where she is befriended by beautiful Rita Johnson, she makes full use of the library, where she studies and learns how to steal "within the law." There's never a dull moment in this compact 65 minute drama, with good actors and snappy dialogue. With newsreels, trailers, and a cartoon, it makes for a satisfying evening.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"The law's always good if you have it on your side."
classicsoncall8 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
As unlikely as some of these B programmers would be in real life, they often prove to be pretty entertaining. This is one of the good ones, even if you have to stretch the premise to make it work. You've heard stories of people using their prison time to hit the law books, and that's the story here as Mary Turner (Ruth Hussey), wrongfully accused and convicted of a merchandise theft from the store in which she worked, is sent off to state prison for a three-year sentence. You would think a good lawyer could have built a substantial case regarding her innocence, but it didn't look like she even had one. Vowing revenge on her former employer Gilder (Samuel S. Hinds), Mary leaves prison with a handful of schemes meant to make Gilder sorry he ever had her put away. One of them involved marrying the boss's son (Tom Neal), but wouldn't you know it, she gets sappy over the guy and winds up falling in love with him. The earlier gimmick with the arrest of her friend Agnes (Rita Johnson) also didn't seem to make any sense; the store could have called the bank before she left to ensure the check would cover the two grand she wrote it for. Even for 1939, I don't think a major department store would be that trusting. In any event, the resolution to the story gets unnecessarily complicated with a murder and another non-fatal shooting, with outlaw Joe Garson (Paul Kelly) coming clean to admit he killed fellow criminal, English Eddie Morton (Paul Cavanagh) during a planned robbery at the Gilder home, thereby taking Mary off the hook. In hindsight, what makes the players in this drama all the more fascinating is that Paul Kelly was convicted and spent jail time for manslaughter a decade before this film was released, while Tom Neal was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the death of his wife Barbara Payton in 1965. I guess you had to be there, because I don't know how it would have been involuntary that she caught a bullet to the back of her head.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hard to believe...but who cares, as it's quite entertaining.
planktonrules23 March 2018
Mary Turner (Ruth Hussey) works at a department store and some stolen store merchandise is found in her locker. She is innocent but her employer, Mr. Gilder, prosecutes her--and she receives three years in prison. Not surprisingly, Mary is bitter and wants revenge. But she's smart...and spends her time in prison studying law and looking for LEGAL ways to hurt her ex-employer. When she is released from prison, Mary meets up with a gang of crooks (headed by Joe Garson--played by Paul Kelly) and insists they listen to her...as they will legally be able to make a ton of money off Gilder family. While there are several scams she wants to use, legal scams, the big score is to marry Gilder's son (Tom Neal) and destroy the family.

Does the story seem believable in any way? No....but it's highly entertaining and unusual. I loved the plot, though must admit near the end it did became a bit too complicated. Overall, well worth seeing...and ironic because two of the actors in the film, Neal and Kelly actually DID spend time in prison in real life...both for Manslaughter.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tough talk without the passion of the depression.
mark.waltz22 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is an enjoyable but rather rushed remake of "Paid" (1930), made at the height of Joan Crawford's population. It's Ruth Hussey's turn at the part of the framed shopgirl, unjustly accused of stealing a piece of jewelry and vowing revenge against the department store owner (Samuel S. Hinds) who refused to believe her claim of Innocence. Upon her release, she sets out for revenge, has his store framed for wrongful imprisonment and then dates and marries his son Tom Neal.

A decent programmer that feels rather rushed even though it has fabulous production values and good performances. Rita Johnson is terrific as the wisecracking inmate who befriends Hussey and aides her in getting back into society. As good as she is, I found it hard to believe that Hussey's character would go as far as she does; With Crawford, you really felt her hatred. Hussey's character tries to grow her claws, but she's basically a kitten in a bad mood while Crawford had alley cat oozing out of her eyes.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
First-rate "B" movie
MikeMagi14 November 2015
Back in the days before television, there was nothing wrong with being a "B" movie. They went by quickly and some were pretty darned entertaining -- "Within the Law," for example. Ruth Hussey plays a sweet young girl who's accused of theft. Despite being innocent, she's sentenced to three years in jail and comes out swearing revenge against the department store tycoon who testified against her. Her plan -- to humiliate him by marrying his son. But she falls in love with the guy which creates a problem when a few old friends try to rope her into robbing the tycoon's home. Does it all work out in the end? Of course. But along the way, there are several lively twists along with contributions from old pros like Paul Kelly and William Gargan.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Legal loopholes
AAdaSC28 August 2023
Shop assistant Ruth Hussey (Mary) is falsely accused of theft and prosecuted by department store owner Samual S Hinds (Gilder) as an example to others. She is sentenced to 3 years in prison and promises to get revenge on him.

What makes this enjoyable is that there are no pathetic women who cry and go all soppy or scream and faint and all that kind of nonsense which I find intolerable. So, the film scores an extra point for me on this front. Hussey vows revenge and that is exactly what she does as she emerges from her time in prison having studied legal loopholes. This allows her to execute her plans on her release and ensure that she operates within the law.

The cast are all good. I couldn't stand Tom Neal (Dick) as the department store's son at the beginning but he won me over so another point for that. Speaking of Tom Neal, this cast contains 3 people who you should read up about - Tom Neal, Paul Kelly (Joe) and Rita Johnson (Agnes). A couple of nasty people and a victim of a cover-up - a hairdryer accidently 'fell' on her head causing brain damage!!!

An entertaining short film that is worth keeping to watch again.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
10/10
alainaoboza4 August 2023
Early in his film career, Neal briefly worked at MGM. His first role was in "Out West with the Hardys" from Mickey Rooney's "Andy Hardy" series. This one came next and is from the studio's B-movie unit, starring Ruth Hussey as a clerk wrongfully convicted of theft. After serving 3 years in prison, she seeks revenge on the department store tycoon who sent her upriver. It's not bad and it's certainly a cut above the cheap PRC and Republic movies in Neal's later career.

The film itself is a remake of a 1911 play about a saleswoman who becomes a criminal mastermind using legal means ("Within the Law") to screw with the system she blames for her downfall. It spawned 5 film versions, including a silent one with Norma Talmadge and the most famous being "Paid" in 1930 with Joan Crawford. This is the final version.

Hussey was actually a major lead in MGM's B-unit, but is best known today for her supporting roles ("The Philadelphia Story," "Susan and God") and her time on Broadway. She's a little too sophisticated for a saleswoman, but she still pulls it off. A few MGM regulars, including Paul Kelly performing his standard gangster role, are involved. Neal isn't especially good as the rich department store son Hussey marries and (surprise, surprise) falls in love with. The film again highlights that he was much better at playing crooks and crooks than a jovial protagonist.

The story is highly improbable. But I enjoyed the working class versus the rich tones, as well as a smart woman being the leader of a group of crooks and crooks. Finally, I'm always amused by some of the weird women's fashions of the time (costumes here from Dolly Tree). In the final scene, Hussy is wearing an outfit that seems more suited to a carnival or magic act.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed