20 reviews
- bkoganbing
- Jul 14, 2009
- Permalink
- vincentlynch-moonoi
- Jul 16, 2011
- Permalink
The 'BIO PICTURE' was a staple of Warner Brothers (WB) from its inception. Now lets be clear about that, it does not mean historical accuracy. It was (and is) a form of entertainment that loosely uses real events and people and spins a story that was (and is) appropriate at the time of it's release. There is enough facts and truth in these productions to stimulate interest to those who wish to delve deeper. We suggest that A DISPATCH FROM REUTER'S may have a lot more in it then is shown on screen. For that you need to go to the library or catch something on one (1) of the educational channels.
What is shown though is very entertaining. Edward G. Robinson plays 'Julius Reuter' who created the first world wide information system. His performance like all those when he was interested in the role is credible and sincere. Edna Best plays his wife 'Ida' and also delivers in a way that is believable. The supporting cast of WB contract players of the time all do their job. Photography by James Wong Howe and musical score by Max Steiner is what you come to expect for such a production, professional. As well as direction by William Dieterle who was the WB's director of choice during that period for the 'BIO' picture.
The only fly in the ointment is the irritating performance of Eddie Albert's 'Max Wagner' as 'Reuter's' friend and irresponsible jerk. We will not catalog all 'Max's' shortcomings but lets just say this. Any normal business owner would have fired him or had him disappear by way of THE SOPRANOS! For some reason during the 30's and 40's this type of character was supposed to be endearing to the audience in a way that escapes us today. There is a parallel to this during that period known as the "idiot plot". A simple misunderstanding that if simply explained away would have solved everything in the first reel.
Other then that we endorse watching this film. If you can also catch DR. EHRLICH'S MAGIC BULLET, do so. Mr. Robinson also stars in that one (1) and the film is a stronger drama with a tighter plot. Rating for DR. EHRLICH'S MAGIC BULLET IMDb**********Ten (10).
What is shown though is very entertaining. Edward G. Robinson plays 'Julius Reuter' who created the first world wide information system. His performance like all those when he was interested in the role is credible and sincere. Edna Best plays his wife 'Ida' and also delivers in a way that is believable. The supporting cast of WB contract players of the time all do their job. Photography by James Wong Howe and musical score by Max Steiner is what you come to expect for such a production, professional. As well as direction by William Dieterle who was the WB's director of choice during that period for the 'BIO' picture.
The only fly in the ointment is the irritating performance of Eddie Albert's 'Max Wagner' as 'Reuter's' friend and irresponsible jerk. We will not catalog all 'Max's' shortcomings but lets just say this. Any normal business owner would have fired him or had him disappear by way of THE SOPRANOS! For some reason during the 30's and 40's this type of character was supposed to be endearing to the audience in a way that escapes us today. There is a parallel to this during that period known as the "idiot plot". A simple misunderstanding that if simply explained away would have solved everything in the first reel.
Other then that we endorse watching this film. If you can also catch DR. EHRLICH'S MAGIC BULLET, do so. Mr. Robinson also stars in that one (1) and the film is a stronger drama with a tighter plot. Rating for DR. EHRLICH'S MAGIC BULLET IMDb**********Ten (10).
I saw this again the other night after many years and was impressed at how entertaining it was. It moves at a cracking pace (so typical of Warner Bros style) and has a great cast of fine character actors (especially Albert Bassermann, Nigel Bruce and Otto Kruger) supporting Edward G Robinson in the title role, who gives a nicely understated performance.
The telescoping of events and the dramatic license with facts are to be expected in a film from this period, and in the main, the film presents a stirring account of how the transmission of news grew in the 19th century. Some reviewers here criticise Warners for not mentioning Reuter's conversion from Judaism to Christianity but anyone thinking a Hollywood studio would tackle such a complex subject in 1940 is expecting far too much. The direction by Dieterle is first rate and the pace is brisk, with the hand of Hal Wallis very obvious in the snappy editing and excision of any superfluous material.
Much was made on the historical accuracy of the sets such as the London Stock exchange) and certainly, the recreation of the House of Commons in London while smaller than the real thing, looked very convincing.
There is much else to enjoy here if you are a movie buff of Warner films from this period. When Reuter & Max are walking through the city near the beginning, we see many of the famous standing sets on the Warner back-lot at the time, including :- the Casa di Bonnyfeather and canal at Leghorn (built for Anthony Adverse): the large church structure built circa 1930, with the pillars & big flight of steps that featured in so many films including The Roaring 20s (Cagney dies on those steps at the end) and Deception (Bette Davis runs up those steps at the beginning) and we even see the large Nottingham Castle Gate with portcullis built for The Adventures of Robin Hood in 1937. Some of these sets were still standing as late as 1975! Above all, there is Max Steiner's terrific score. This tale clearly resonated in him and he produces one of his most arresting and dramatic works, with a superbly heraldic Main Title which reappears throughout at key points of the story, and also Steiner's most gorgeous waltz (for Reuter's wife played by the lovely and underrated Edna Best) that betrays his Viennese background. Steiner's score for REUTER cries out for a modern recording, yet few ever mention it when discussing his work for films.
I think it is one of his finest, the equal to Now Voyager, All This & Heaven Too and Big Sleep. If the film were shown more, maybe it would be noticed by the CD companies.
So, while this may not be the greatest of the Warner bio-pics, it is certainly unjustly overlooked. Let us hope it reaches DVD soon.
The telescoping of events and the dramatic license with facts are to be expected in a film from this period, and in the main, the film presents a stirring account of how the transmission of news grew in the 19th century. Some reviewers here criticise Warners for not mentioning Reuter's conversion from Judaism to Christianity but anyone thinking a Hollywood studio would tackle such a complex subject in 1940 is expecting far too much. The direction by Dieterle is first rate and the pace is brisk, with the hand of Hal Wallis very obvious in the snappy editing and excision of any superfluous material.
Much was made on the historical accuracy of the sets such as the London Stock exchange) and certainly, the recreation of the House of Commons in London while smaller than the real thing, looked very convincing.
There is much else to enjoy here if you are a movie buff of Warner films from this period. When Reuter & Max are walking through the city near the beginning, we see many of the famous standing sets on the Warner back-lot at the time, including :- the Casa di Bonnyfeather and canal at Leghorn (built for Anthony Adverse): the large church structure built circa 1930, with the pillars & big flight of steps that featured in so many films including The Roaring 20s (Cagney dies on those steps at the end) and Deception (Bette Davis runs up those steps at the beginning) and we even see the large Nottingham Castle Gate with portcullis built for The Adventures of Robin Hood in 1937. Some of these sets were still standing as late as 1975! Above all, there is Max Steiner's terrific score. This tale clearly resonated in him and he produces one of his most arresting and dramatic works, with a superbly heraldic Main Title which reappears throughout at key points of the story, and also Steiner's most gorgeous waltz (for Reuter's wife played by the lovely and underrated Edna Best) that betrays his Viennese background. Steiner's score for REUTER cries out for a modern recording, yet few ever mention it when discussing his work for films.
I think it is one of his finest, the equal to Now Voyager, All This & Heaven Too and Big Sleep. If the film were shown more, maybe it would be noticed by the CD companies.
So, while this may not be the greatest of the Warner bio-pics, it is certainly unjustly overlooked. Let us hope it reaches DVD soon.
- brendangcarroll
- Sep 7, 2011
- Permalink
- F Gwynplaine MacIntyre
- Apr 13, 2006
- Permalink
Enjoyable Warner Bros. biopic about Paul Julius Reuter, the man who built the famous Reuters news service. Edward G. Robinson players Reuter. The movie covers his story from when he was using carrier pigeons up through the use of the telegraph. As is often the case with these biopics, he faces hardships and doubt from critics but perseveres. It's all pretty formulaic, I admit, but also undeniably entertaining. I was never bored. Eddie G's backed up by a fine stable of character actors, including Gene Lockhart, Otto Kruger, Nigel Bruce, and Albert Bassermann. Edna Best is the love interest and Eddie Albert plays Robinson's assistant. A solid cast. The subject matter may not lend itself to the most exciting story but they do a surprisingly good job keeping it interesting.
I saw A Dispatch from Reuters ages ago (before Netflix, etc), and it was good night viewing for sure. This was a time when news was in print (and TV), so in a way it was the prequel to A Social Network, which charted the rise of Facebook which is its own news outlet.
Edward G. Robinson was in top form as Paul Reuter (without an s) in this black and white movie.
Edward G. Robinson was in top form as Paul Reuter (without an s) in this black and white movie.
Speed and truth was always the motto of Reuter's news agency, and those two characteristics certainly dominate this film, especially speed. Everything is fast here, the dialog keeps constantly firing off, and everything keeps happening at once. Whether you like journalism or not, it's a great story of faith and stubborn integrity constantly fighting incredulity and stupidity, and although it turns out critical at times, the truth always gets through in the end. Edward G. Robinson makes a great portrait of the fantastic news reporter who started with carrier pigeons, being called the "pigeon fool", but always followed the development and made his progress with it. Edna Best makes the endearing part of his wife, Eddie Albert is more interested in writing poems than in his master's craze about pigeons, Nigel Bruce makes a wonderful sponsor and friend both in need and in times of crisis, and there are other grand old actors contributing also. The height of the drama is the murder of President Lincoln and its stormy reactions, and William Dieterle has made a good job of it. This one of those classical biopics of Hollywood from the 30s on.
I approached this film thinking it might be a rather dull and worthy biopic but my fears were unfounded. It moves along at a great pace and is engaging throughout thanks to skillful direction from acclaimed director William Dieterle (Among his credits The Devil and Daniel Webster, The Hunchback of Notre Dame and A Midsummer Night's Dream). This film is great at telling the story of the man who revolutionised press reporting from carrier pigeons to the telegraph and has tremendous heart. The fact that Dieterle was also an actor may also be the reason why this film features a host of great performances from principal to support players alike. Edward G Robinson is superb as Julius Reuter, not only as a businessman but as as a shy romantic and a trusted friend. Whether Reuter himself was a man of such honesty, conviction and innate goodness I do not know but Robinson paints a picture of a heroic yet still human individual. Edna Best , as his wife, anchors things and brings great warmth to make her believable as the rock Reuter could depend upon. In the supporting cast Eddie Albert and Albert Bassermann bring some lovely light comic touches as part of Reuter's management set up, Montagu Love and Alec Craig are memorable as newspapermen, Otto Kruger and Nigel Bruce provide staunch backup as friends and supporters of the main man and Gene Lockhart is a great deal of fun as a roguish but likeable banker.
- loloandpete
- May 7, 2021
- Permalink
Of all the studios of the 1930s-40s, I think Warner Brothers did a particularly good job with biopics during this era. The films tended to get the facts pretty much correct and the stories also are exciting to watch. A few of these wonderful biopics are "The Story of Louis Pasteur", "Dr. Clitterhouse's Magic Bullet" and this film, "Dispatch from Reuters"...and they are well worth your time.
Julius Reuter (Edward G. Robinson) was the man for the creation of the international news service, Reuters. The story shows his company's evolution during the 19th century from a carrier pigeon service to a news agency supplying the world's newspapers with the facts.
Aside from Robinson NOT sporting the huge muttonchops that the real Reuter had, he did a marvelous job making the title character human AND extraordinary. Excellent direction, supporting actors and the overall polished look of the movie make it well worth your time.
Julius Reuter (Edward G. Robinson) was the man for the creation of the international news service, Reuters. The story shows his company's evolution during the 19th century from a carrier pigeon service to a news agency supplying the world's newspapers with the facts.
Aside from Robinson NOT sporting the huge muttonchops that the real Reuter had, he did a marvelous job making the title character human AND extraordinary. Excellent direction, supporting actors and the overall polished look of the movie make it well worth your time.
- planktonrules
- Apr 27, 2024
- Permalink
"A Dispatch From Reuter's" pretty much has one great thing going for it, and that is Edward G. Robinson of course as Julius Reuter. Otherwise, this is semi-standard old-movie fare that can be quite dull most of the time.
Reuter of course was a news pioneer, but not every successful story always makes for a good movie. Seeing guys in the 1930s and 1940s play people in the 1800s is always kind of funny. (Especially when they do the "harumph" thing when they get angry.) There's a lot of talk concerning pigeons that the viewer will get tired of pretty quickly. The characters aren't engaging and the plot is, well, boring and thin. It's a ten-minute movie stretched out to 90 minutes.
Unless you are a fan of Edward G. Robinson really, which I am, this is definitely one you can certainly live without seeing.
Reuter of course was a news pioneer, but not every successful story always makes for a good movie. Seeing guys in the 1930s and 1940s play people in the 1800s is always kind of funny. (Especially when they do the "harumph" thing when they get angry.) There's a lot of talk concerning pigeons that the viewer will get tired of pretty quickly. The characters aren't engaging and the plot is, well, boring and thin. It's a ten-minute movie stretched out to 90 minutes.
Unless you are a fan of Edward G. Robinson really, which I am, this is definitely one you can certainly live without seeing.
- stevenfallonnyc
- Jul 14, 2009
- Permalink
Another gem from Hollywood's golden age, "A Dispatch From Reuters", tells the fascinating true story of Julius Reuter (played by the marvelous Edward G. Robinson), founder of the famous news agency, and who started to transmit information using pigeons. Impeccable production, was a distinguished addition to Warner's series of biopics, with fine cast and a typically wonderful music score by the brilliant Max Steiner.
Another in EGR's quest to be considered a 'prestige' actor in the Paul Muni mold, (although he is far better than Muni, IMO), by playing biographies. This would make an excellent double bill with Dr. Erlich's Magic Bullet. Both are about idealistic rebels going up against the establishment in their professions and eventually triumphing. Both are entertaining with lively, well-acted characters, despite not having any conventional 'action'. Both are Hollywood's attempt to tell us who we are and hint at where we are going by looking at how we got here.
EGR is fine. Edna Best, with whom I was not familiar, (she was Herbert Marshall's wife and had been a major success on the London stage in the 20's) was very impressive. I really like Albert Basserman, Gene Lockhart, Montau Love and Nigel Bruce in supporting parts.
I really didn't like Eddie Albert's character, a long-time friend and assistant to Reuters who has none of Reuter's qualities: he's lazy and rather stupid, hardly the type an ambitious genius would have around him or give a substantial role in his business. But an old Hollywood trick is to pair the clever hero with an idiotic companion to make him look smart, as it with Bruce's performance as Dr. Watson, (who should be a smart character in his own right, the better to appreciate Holmes' genius) in the Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes series.
EGR is fine. Edna Best, with whom I was not familiar, (she was Herbert Marshall's wife and had been a major success on the London stage in the 20's) was very impressive. I really like Albert Basserman, Gene Lockhart, Montau Love and Nigel Bruce in supporting parts.
I really didn't like Eddie Albert's character, a long-time friend and assistant to Reuters who has none of Reuter's qualities: he's lazy and rather stupid, hardly the type an ambitious genius would have around him or give a substantial role in his business. But an old Hollywood trick is to pair the clever hero with an idiotic companion to make him look smart, as it with Bruce's performance as Dr. Watson, (who should be a smart character in his own right, the better to appreciate Holmes' genius) in the Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes series.
In this fascinating biopic of Paul Reuter, Edward G. Robinson stars and transforms into yet another very convincing non-gangster. For someone remembered most for Little Caesar, it's astonishing how many roles in his career were intelligent, sensitive men. In this period piece, he plays a dedicated inventor who wants people to be able to communicate with each other quickly. He develops the carrier pigeon service by training the pigeons to fly between two cities. No one believes in him or gives him financial backing until his birds save the lives of countless children who are about to be poisoned by the wrong medicine. He still has an uphill battle, particularly against slimy and selfish villain Gene Lockhart, and he puts his entire heart and soul into his business. From pigeons to telegrams to stock trading to newspapers, he transforms Europe and the rest of the world.
If you're interested in the historical story, you'll love this movie. I don't know how historically accurate it is about his personal life, but his inventions and systems have truly changed our lives. You might want to check out Eddie G in the same year's drama, Dr. Ehrlich's Magic Bullet, in which he stars as the man who cured syphilis. On a sweeter note, I loved the romance between Eddie G and Edna Best. There is a friendship and business relationship with Eddie Albert, but Albert's character is silly and irresponsible. Eddie G and Edna are adorable as they fall in love at first sight. He's too shy to make a move until he knows of her feelings, but as soon as he does, he sends a carrier pigeon with an important question: will she marry him? He stands at the window of the pigeon coop for hours, anxiously awaiting her reply. It's so adorable! History buffs might not care about his proposal, but Hollywood fans will find it very endearing.
If you're interested in the historical story, you'll love this movie. I don't know how historically accurate it is about his personal life, but his inventions and systems have truly changed our lives. You might want to check out Eddie G in the same year's drama, Dr. Ehrlich's Magic Bullet, in which he stars as the man who cured syphilis. On a sweeter note, I loved the romance between Eddie G and Edna Best. There is a friendship and business relationship with Eddie Albert, but Albert's character is silly and irresponsible. Eddie G and Edna are adorable as they fall in love at first sight. He's too shy to make a move until he knows of her feelings, but as soon as he does, he sends a carrier pigeon with an important question: will she marry him? He stands at the window of the pigeon coop for hours, anxiously awaiting her reply. It's so adorable! History buffs might not care about his proposal, but Hollywood fans will find it very endearing.
- HotToastyRag
- Jan 16, 2024
- Permalink
"A Dispatch From Reuter's" is best viewed by fans of the inimitable Edward G. Robinson, who turns in one of his usual excellent performances as Julius Reuter. The thin plot and sappy romance are best forgotten however. The usual supporting cast of Warner's does a credible job considering the deficiencies of the script. The notable exception is the always repulsive and completely untalented Eddie Albert, featured here as Reuter's assistant, Max Wagner, an apparent moron who is even dumber and more hapless than Gilligan from "Gilligan's Island". He manages to completely ruin every scene he's in. One would have to wonder why a smart guy like Reuter would hire such a complete boob.
Edward G. Robinson was a most interesting movie star in classic film history. Like Bogart, James Cagney, and Spencer Tracy, he was a character actor who became a leading man. That didn't and doesn't happen to many actors or actresses. Robinson could do anything - he could be mean, pathetic, a blowhard, a loser, hilarious, whatever the role called for. Along with his Warners colleague, Paul Muni, he did his share of biopics. "A Dispatch from Reuters" from 1940 is one.
Robinson plays Julius Reuter. Since this film is really about the news agency he founded, much of Reuter's life is left out. Of interest, he was a German Jew who moved to London and ultimately converted to Christianity (before marrying Ida, who was a Christian), taking the first name of Paul. He also became a naturalized British citizen and was named a Baron by Queen Victoria. He had three sons, and the last member of the Reuter family, the widow of one of his grandsons, died in 2009.
Anyway, to get back to the film - there was some dramatic license taken, but the basic story is accurate. Reuter did start out with carrier pigeons, and the film does follow the evolution of the agency accurately as far as his news beating the ships, etc.
Edward G. Robinson is excellent as Julius, and though it's unclear how much of a struggle the real Reuter had in getting clients, Robinson shows determination and ambition throughout the film. I have to agree with one of the reviewers on this site who thought the Eddie Albert character was too lazy to have continued to be employed. Albert is good, though, as is the rest of the cast -- Albert Basserman, Edna Best, Gene Lockhart, Nigel Bruce, Otto Kruger, and Montagu Love.
Entertaining film.
Robinson plays Julius Reuter. Since this film is really about the news agency he founded, much of Reuter's life is left out. Of interest, he was a German Jew who moved to London and ultimately converted to Christianity (before marrying Ida, who was a Christian), taking the first name of Paul. He also became a naturalized British citizen and was named a Baron by Queen Victoria. He had three sons, and the last member of the Reuter family, the widow of one of his grandsons, died in 2009.
Anyway, to get back to the film - there was some dramatic license taken, but the basic story is accurate. Reuter did start out with carrier pigeons, and the film does follow the evolution of the agency accurately as far as his news beating the ships, etc.
Edward G. Robinson is excellent as Julius, and though it's unclear how much of a struggle the real Reuter had in getting clients, Robinson shows determination and ambition throughout the film. I have to agree with one of the reviewers on this site who thought the Eddie Albert character was too lazy to have continued to be employed. Albert is good, though, as is the rest of the cast -- Albert Basserman, Edna Best, Gene Lockhart, Nigel Bruce, Otto Kruger, and Montagu Love.
Entertaining film.
Dispatch from Reuter's, A (1940)
** 1/2 (out of 4)
Minor bio-pic from Warner features Edward G. Robinson as Paul Julius Reuter, the man who started off with pigeons and then building Europe's fastest news wire service. The late 30's and early 40's were full of biography movies and this one here is somewhat entertaining but there's just not enough here to make it really worth seeing. I know a few things about Reuter's life that wasn't included in this film and I can only guess that the subject wouldn't have interested folks in 1940. With that said, I'm really not sure what Jack Warner himself would have found so interesting about the story actually filmed. The main story has Reuter trying to stay ahead of other people and a big finale about his report on the Lincoln assassination and whether or not it's true. There really never is any drama that builds from any of the situations, although I will admit the stuff with the pigeons was pretty good. The film covers a wide range of years but the time itself never seems to move in the film. Not for a second did I believe I was watching something taking place in the 1820's and this really takes away from the atmosphere that should have been created. Robinson turns in a fairly good performance but I did expect more from him. He fits the role quite well but not once did I feel too much passion coming from him. Edna Best serves as the wife but doesn't really add too much. Eddie Albert does the best work of the cast with Gene Lockhart, Otto Kruger, James Stephenson and Nigel Bruce rounding out the supporting players. Child star Dickie Moore has a brief part in the film. I'm sure a good movie might be made with this story but sadly it's not this one.
** 1/2 (out of 4)
Minor bio-pic from Warner features Edward G. Robinson as Paul Julius Reuter, the man who started off with pigeons and then building Europe's fastest news wire service. The late 30's and early 40's were full of biography movies and this one here is somewhat entertaining but there's just not enough here to make it really worth seeing. I know a few things about Reuter's life that wasn't included in this film and I can only guess that the subject wouldn't have interested folks in 1940. With that said, I'm really not sure what Jack Warner himself would have found so interesting about the story actually filmed. The main story has Reuter trying to stay ahead of other people and a big finale about his report on the Lincoln assassination and whether or not it's true. There really never is any drama that builds from any of the situations, although I will admit the stuff with the pigeons was pretty good. The film covers a wide range of years but the time itself never seems to move in the film. Not for a second did I believe I was watching something taking place in the 1820's and this really takes away from the atmosphere that should have been created. Robinson turns in a fairly good performance but I did expect more from him. He fits the role quite well but not once did I feel too much passion coming from him. Edna Best serves as the wife but doesn't really add too much. Eddie Albert does the best work of the cast with Gene Lockhart, Otto Kruger, James Stephenson and Nigel Bruce rounding out the supporting players. Child star Dickie Moore has a brief part in the film. I'm sure a good movie might be made with this story but sadly it's not this one.
- Michael_Elliott
- Sep 11, 2009
- Permalink
- dbdumonteil
- Oct 11, 2008
- Permalink