User Reviews

"A Stranger in Town" holds up very well after sixty-three years. The only part that seems curious and quaint today is the closing with Joe Grant (The Wizard of Oz, aka Frank Morgan) giving a rousing patriotic speech (remember this was made during the height of World War II). The court packing scheme of President Roosevelt was still fresh on the movie goer's mind, having been all over the news a short six years earlier. So having a Supreme Court justice go incognito was apropos in 1943. Today, few would recognize a Supreme Court justice if they tripped over one. So no need for a disguise. Changing times.

Associate Justice Josephus Grant attempting to get away from it all goes on a duck-hunting vacation to the small town of Crown Port. He no sooner arrives than he is arrested and tried for not having a local hunting license but in reality because he wouldn't pay off the local police official who caught him. It becomes obvious to Grant that he has chosen a corrupt town for his vacation. Enter a reform candidate for mayor, Bill Adams (Richard Carlson), who has virtually given up any hope of winning. Grant rallies Adams onward and upward by teaching him tricks of the trade in the court room. Fighting city hall becomes more fun when Grant's business-like, yet attractive and smart, secretary, Lucy Gilbert (Jean Rogers), comes to town to bring Grant important papers concerning a case the Court is hearing. Yes, it is love at first sight between Adams and Lucy. Much of the fun centers on Adams' clumsiness and shyness in trying to court Lucy. The election heats up with all sorts of humorous skulduggery until the showdown involving a free-for-all brawl on the street in front of Adams' campaign headquarters.

This film is so fast-paced with fine acting by all involved, including a gallery of character actors such as Chill Wills, Olin Howland, Donald MacBride, Porter Hall, and even Eddy Waller in a bit part, that it proves extremely entertaining with many a wry comment on the politics of the day, which are not unlike the politics of today.

"A Stranger in Town" turns out to be a pleasant surprise. I originally viewed it to see Frank (The Wizard of Oz) Morgan in a starring role, and did not have any grand expectations. But it turned out to be a droll little film, quite entertaining.

The whole plot is predicated on the general anonymity of Supreme Court justices. Does anyone know what they look like? Can anyone even name all 9? Along the way, we get a look and some commentary on small town American life in the 1940s, as well as a Capra-esque speech by Morgan near the end of the film.

Their is also some requisite romantic interest thrown in, which is quite incidental and was probably just added to stretch out the running time. The film also has Porter Hall, who played the heel in "Miracle on 34th St." and the heel in "The Thin Man", playing, you guessed it, a heel.

Overall, a very pleasant way to spend 70 minutes. Give it a view when you get the chance.

Good "B" picture starring Frank Morgan as a Supreme Court justice who goes on a hunting trip. He winds up becoming entangled with a small town's crooked politicians. Unassuming drama has a slight Frank Capra feel to it. Morgan is very good in a subdued performance. Richard Carlson plays the young lawyer who seems to be the only one in town that wants to stand up to the corrupt politicians. Robert Barrat, Porter Hall, Donald MacBride and company make amusing villains. Jean Rogers is the pretty love interest for Carlson. Pleasant cast and an earnest script. Short runtime helps. This is an entertaining hidden gem you should definitely check out if you get the chance.

Looking for something to watch on a Friday evening while feeling ill I ran across this wonderful little gem I had dvr'd earlier in the week solely because it had Frank Morgan AND Richard Carlson. My mind wanted to see The Wizard of Oz meets the man who fights The Creature from the Black Lagoon and how well they would be together! TCM had given it only 3 stars so I was not expecting much and the first 90% of the film was entertaining enough, a solid 3 star movie. Amusing to envision a time when a Supreme Court Justice would not be instantly recognized by the Mayberry-esque type town mayor and judge (even if the quaint town does have some shady goings on). No googling in that day and age! Then we reach the last 10 minutes of the film. Which if I could rate the film ONLY on those last 10 minutes it would be a solid 5 stars. Frank Morgan delivers a speech that will move and inspire you. Gave me chills to hear a monologue from a man written and spoken over 60 years ago that could be a headline of this evenings news. The problems he spoke about are exactly the problems our nation is facing today. Touched me so profoundly I played it over and over until I got every word written down and then posted it online to my friends. Bottom line, a nice enough little film from the early 40's with a magnificent ending. Worth watching with your children for not only does it address some current political problems but also bullying.

Oddly, this film stars Frank Morgan as a Supreme Court justice! He's on vacation and runs afoul of a small town's corrupt administration. The crooked judge, mayor and their henchmen don't realize who Morgan is, so he's able to see first-hand their under-handed tactics. Because of their abuse of political power, Morgan decides to stick around and assist a naive young lawyer (Richard Carlson) in his bid to become mayor. At first, they are pretty much ignored, though in time, when the race for mayor seems tight, the old mayor unleashed a wave of dirty tricks--not realizing that Morgan holds the ultimate trump card.

I had a hard time deciding whether to score this one a 7 or an 8. It was very good--particularly for a B-movie. Being a "B", it is a relatively short picture (only 67 minutes) but unlike many Bs it has excellent production values (especially the writing) and is very entertaining. About the only knock against it is that I thought the fight scenes were a bit too "slapsticky" and didn't exactly integrate well into the rest of the picture. Still, it's a dandy performance by Frank Morgan, as he's more restrained (i.e., less "hammy") than in most of his starring vehicles--well worth seeing and a lot of fun--as well as a decent civics lesson.

In "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" (1939), fly-over wisdom solves Washington corruption. In "A Stranger in Town" (1943), Washington wisdom solves fly-over corruption.

Frank Morgan portrays an incognito Supreme Court justice, who during his duck-hunting vacation, is reluctantly drawn into a small town fight against corruption. It is a dramatic change from his usual flamboyant-befuddled performance, and he does pretty well. One discordant note, however, occurs early in the picture. Morgan, while cradling a shotgun, meanders throughout town, into a barbershop, and even a courtroom. Nowadays, he'd have been pounced on, and probably branded a lunatic.

The film's pace is snappy, the romantic leads (Richard Carlson and Jean Rogers) have excellent chemistry, and the supporting cast is fabulous. It includes Robert Barrat, Porter Hall, John Hodiak (in his debut), Donald MacBride, Andrew Tombes, and Chill Wills (later Francis-the-Talking-Mule's voice). Ironically, however, Robert Barrat, who does a fine job playing the oleaginous mayor, had, about a decade earlier, been cast in an opposing role as a bucolic reformer fighting corruption. (His part was in "The St. Louis Kid" [1934], a charming James Cagney vehicle.) Yet, "A Stranger" has two sloppy errors, both of which occur in the same scene. (They should have been caught and corrected.) First, Carlson enters the local hotel and orders a "single room" for the night, but walks away leaving his key behind. Then, the following morning in court, he testifies that the hotel had violated the law by having the twin beds in his room placed less than two feet apart. If his room was a single, however, it wouldn't have had twin beds.

Finally, you might try following-up this film with "The Magnificent Yankee" (1950) if you're into related double features. It is a heartwarming story about Oliver Wendell Holmes, an actual Supreme Court justice, whose tenure would have ended at about the same time Morgan's fictitious one had started.

Absolutely an outstanding movie. "A Stranger In Town" has laughs, fun moments, drama, tension and manages to keep it all lighthearted enough to make it an enjoyable movie for one and all. Frank Morgan (Wizard Of Oz 1939) is excellent as a vacationing Supreme Court Justice who stumbles into a corrupt town's government. Richard Carlson (Hold That Ghost 1941) is just as good as a small town lawyer trying to right a system gone wrong. The supporting cast is equally as entertaining (Jean Rogers, Porter Hall, Robert Barrat, etc...) in this great, great movie. While the director Roy Rowland (Dr. Seuss's The 5,000 Fingers Of Dr.T. 1953) is new to me, it is a marvelous job of direction on his part that also helps to make this an A movie for me.

What makes this one Stand Out from War Years Motion Picture Portrayals of Small Town America is the Realist Portrayal of Corruption. Films of that Era (WWII) Tended to Propagandize the USA as a Utopia of Goodness as its Rally Cry to Ramp Up the Citizenry.

Nothing Wrong with that but it is Refreshing that this Little Movie had the Integrity to Say that Maybe We were not Perfect and some Fighting was needed Right Here at Home. Notice how the Justice Prods and Pokes at Apathy and Cowardice against Inequities and Bullying.

It's all Done in a Lighthearted Manner and is Good Entertainment while Posing Questions and Inspiring to a Greater Good. Certainly Worth a Watch for 1943 Cultural References that are Still Relevant Today.

***SPOILERS*** Taking a long needed vacation from his duties as a United States Supreme Court Justice the Honorable Judge John Josephus Grant, Frank Morgan, goes to the little sleepy town of Crownport to among other things go duck hunting. What the judge doesn't realize is what a den of corruption and thievery that town is.

As soon as the judge went out hunting he was a victim of a shake-down by the towns game warden Warren Todd, Olin Howlin. Todd with the help of Crownport Judge Austin Harkley, Porter Hall, fleeced the startled judge of $100.00 in fines for not having a Crownport hunting license even though he had a state hunting license. The judge didn't even have a chance to get off one shot before he was stopped by Game Warden Todd.

Judge Grant decides to remain undercover and clean up the town of Crownport and finds help in a honest but bumbling politician running for mayor Bill Adams, Richard Carlson. The judge also calls his private secretary Lucy Gilbert, Jean Rogers, to come over to lend him and Bill a hand. That Lucy can really swing a mean and heavy law book when things get out of hand in the film.

The mayor of the town of Crownport James Connison, Robert Barrat, is a sleazy shyster who uses all the power of his office as well as a gang of head breaking goons to keep everyone in order. Now he's having trouble with Bill running against him for mayor and does everything he can to sabotage his campaign. First he has Bill evicted from his offices because of a health hazard which was that Bill had some wood there and it was determined by Connison's health inspectors that the lumber would attract termites. Next the mayor has his goons assault Bill and when he fights back, very badly, he's arrested for disturbing the peace and thrown in jail.

Lucy is also arrested with Bill on trumped up charges as she defended herself as well as Bill with a heavy law book that she broke a couple of Connison's goons heads with. Meanwhile judge Grant slowly works his magic or better yet knowledge of the law, behind the scenes, to build an air-tight case against the Connison mob. The goons working for him begin to chicken out as they realize that their slowly getting their necks in a ringer by the skillful and wily Judge Grant.

There's also a romance developed in the movie between Bill and Lucy and at the end of the film they get married and guess just who's the justice of the peace at their wedding? With the noose tightening around Mayor Connison's neck his goons and even his hand picked stooge of a judge Judge Harkley desert him. Connison, being the arrogant and power hungry jerk that he is, is the last one to realize that he's been set up and shot down. At a town hall meeting where Connison thinks that he's about to be anointed mayor he's exposed as a crooked politician and a man who betrayed the trust that the good people of Crownport gave to him. It's there when Judge Grant finally reveals who he is, not just a stranger in town but the United States Supreme Court Justice John Josephus Grant.

Mayor Connison who thought all this time that he was running the show is practically run out of town and ends up, together with his goon squad, behind bars. "A Stranger in Town" gives the audience a fine civic lesson about the responsibilities of being a good American citizen which Judge Grant brings out at the end of the movie with a stirring speech about what America really stands for and what the saying "The Land of the Free and The Home of the Brave" really means.

Worth watching now as it was back then in 1943 about an America that was meant to be in the nation that our founding fathers fought and died for back during the American Revolutionary War.

A Stranger in Town is a rather inconsequential film released in 1943. It is listed as a romance/drama, but it is more comedy than anything else, because the story is written very lightly.

When I saw the title, I immediately wondered which version of small-town America would be presented--the myth of small town generosity that embraces all strangers as if they were friends, or the sometime reality that in small towns, people are suspicious of strangers and their motives, regarding them as outsiders (and sometimes barbarians). We don't have to wait long to find out.

Supreme Court justice Joe Grant (played by Frank Morgan) visits the small town of Crown Port to get away from the city and hunt ducks. He immediately encounters the local game warden who invokes a local law and tries to extract a few bucks out of him. Joe goes to court to contest the fine and gets a less than encouraging result.

While in town, he meets Bill Adams (Richard Carlson), a local attorney who is miffed enough about the entrenched, corrupt town mayor, and his cronies, to run for election against the mayor. But he feels he is fighting a losing battle, so his effort is half-hearted. Joe becomes a mentor to the young attorney and eventually lights a fire under his nominal campaign. Joe brings his secretary, Lucy Gilbert (Jean Rogers), to town where she also becomes involved in the proceedings.

Both sides--the political machine of the incumbent and Bill's allies--use (some arcane) laws to battle. They thrust and parry until there is fighting in the streets.

This is another film about the rights of men, and how they should hold government responsible in the name of justice. But if one watches carefully, the film demonstrates the unfortunate truth that the law is not about justice. Real knowledge of law is only available to attorneys. The common man must avail himself of their services, knowing that laws are created by (mostly lawyer) politicians. We all know how highly politicians are held in the public's esteem.

Though this film was shooting for a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington-type rallying of the human spirit in the name of the "little man", it falls short.

In the end, this film wraps up very neatly, as expected. I would watch the film, but not expect more than a cute little story with likable characters.

Frank Morgan who since The Great Cellini played mostly bumbling fools in film took a somewhat serious turn in his career with this B film from his studio MGM. A Stranger In Town casts Morgan as a Supreme Court Justice who comes to a small town for a hunting vacation. When he gets shaken down for a local hunting license Morgan takes a hand in the local reform movement to get the gang of crooks led by Mayor Robert Barrat.

The reform candidate for mayor against Barrat is Richard Carlson an eager young lawyer with more passion than courtroom smarts. But getting tutelage from a Supreme Court Justice albeit incognito certainly stood him in good stead. That and a little romance from Justice Morgan's law clerk Jean Rogers.

Some of the other members of the cast are such familiar character players as Irving Bacon, Andrew Toombes, Donald MacBride, Olin Howland, and Chill Wills that cast is guaranteed entertainment. Of particular note is Porter Hall playing a corrupt judge who gets an opportunity to get out from under and takes it gratefully. John Hodiak made his feature film debut in A Stranger In Town.

A Stranger In Town is a Capra-lite like comedy which holds up well even in these more sophisticated times.

I have to admit that what initially drew me to watch A Stranger in Town was its 67 minute run time. I don't recall ever seeing such a short run time and I was curious. The result is that I'm very happy that I took the time to check it out because it's a very pleasant, humorous, and enjoyable film. Most of the performances are solid, the production values are decent, and it's a good story. I don't recall ever seeing John Carlson or Jean Rogers on film before, but I found them quite likeable here and may have to see what else they've done. A Stranger in Town is worth checking out.

Frank Morgan goes duck hunting and discovers Richard Carlson running as underdog against Mayor Robert Barrat who has corrupted the entire town. An obscure law is found and a cheating local car salesman has to stop using people to get more money. Then the local hotel owner is sued for under sized sheets and pillow cases. Carlsons, Adams, also wins over Jean Rogers, Lucy Grant, Frank Morgan's secretary. There are great fist fights in a barber shop and on Main St. The point of the story is that even though Morgan did not want any involvement while on vacation, he did get involved. He did this to overcome local corruption and to show that fighting for a good America is what America is all about.

Previous reviewers of this movie are all over the map. Some really liked it, others were disappointed that Frank Morgan did not reprise his role in the Wizard of Oz. Most don't seem to appreciate the movie for what it had to offer movie goers in 1943. And that's a shame.

This movie was made during the early part of World War II. The Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor in Dec 1941. We started to strike back in the Pacific, and in Nov 1942 we managed to invade and take control of North Africa (Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia). That would allow us to prepare for an invasion of what Churchill called *the soft underbelly of Europe*, Italy and eventually southern France. By April of 1943, things were starting to look better for us, but D-Day, and our success there, were still a year and a half away. There were still many isolationists in the U. S. who felt we should not have gone to war in Europe. Others wondered if we would succeed against Germany. But FDR said that we had to defend *the four freedoms* around the world. American values, if you will, but FDR was not so close-minded as to depict them as just American.

That's what this movie is all about, encapsulated in Frank Morgan's speech before the court near the end of the movie. It is every American's duty to defend democratic (with a small d) values. That means fighting locally the sort of small-town corruption and dictatorship that tries to take self-government away from the people. (The romantic lead, who starts off as a weakling, will learn that in the course of the movie, as all Americans, especially isolationists, needed to do.) What the corrupt mayor of that small town was doing was just a smaller version of what dictators around the world were trying to do on a much larger scale. Americans needed to fight such dictators on the home front, just as we needed to fight them on a much greater level.

There are problems with this movie, sure.

The actor who plays the small-town lawyer who must learn to defend democracy, Richard Carlson, isn't up to the task of showing why he is weak to begin with and how he learns to fight with something in addition to - not other than - his fists to win the small-town war against fascism.

The depiction of small-town corruption, presented as unexceptional, suggests that there are worms gnawing away at our great democracy from inside. In the context of this movie, that is disquieting. It might have been more powerful if there had been some effort to link the small-town despots to their equivalent on the world stage.

This movie is never as bone-chilling as masterpieces of the genre like *Mr. Smith Goes to Washington* and *Mr. Deeds Goes to Town*, both of which deal with how corruption in our institutions threaten our democratic way of life. The corrupt small-town powers here hurt two men, but we are not made to feel their pain, or to imagine that their pain could one day be ours. That makes this movie less powerful.

But it's still a lot more than just another romantic comedy. It is another entry in the *Why we fight* series of movies that Hollywood put out during World War II, a series that produced some of the greatest movies ever made.

I guess you could call this a drama comedy romance movie. This is one of my favorite old movies. Jean rogers sparkles in this wild movie and frank morgan performance steals the show. His speech at the end of the movie is inspiring and should be shown to every congressman before they take their pledge to the country. Some really funny comedy scenes in this one as well. The romance between carlson and miss rogers was a bit strained at the beginning, but it all worked out in the end. This occured during the world war two years som this had a strong patriotic feel as well.

Give this one a try i think you will have some fun.

First off this is a good vehicle for the acting of Frank Morgan. The much loved actor takes on the personna of an overworked Supreme Court Associate Justice just trying to get away and hunt duck. Apparently you can take "The Justice" out of his courtroom but you can't take him away from seeking justic - his hunting destination turns out to be a corruptly ran town. As Justice Grant Morgan creates a tough, but quite lovable, crusader for justice. In the process he meets young lawyer turned mayoral candidate. Bill Adams who is in dire need of mentoring. Adams played by. Richard Carlson is immediately likeable as boy next door type lawyer too nice and green when confronted with the corruption of the present mayor and his cronnies. Justice Grant will be the difference and when his secretary Lucy, played by the wholesome beauty Jean Rogers. Shows up it completes a winning trio.

With comedy dipping into even slapstick territory, there's good entertainment to be had as Morgan's Judge Grant steers Carlson's Adams to clean up the town. A romance between Bill Adams and Lucy Gilbert completes that warm and fuzzy feeling. Quite entertaining. Though presented lightly it does remind us of the responsibility of honest government rests with each and every citizen.

Righteous U. S. Supreme Court Justice Joe Grant (Frank Morgan) goes on a secret duck hunting vacation. Lucy Gilbert (Jean Rogers) is his dissatisfied clerk. He's stopped by a game inspector who offers to sell a local stamp for his state license but he expects a tip. Joe insists on going to court. There he finds honest lawyer Bill Adams (Richard Carlson) running against corrupt incumbent mayor Connison.

I've never heard of this movie. This is like a Capra movie with an angry edge. It's not as well conceived or written. There are issues with realism and problematic legal writing. Adams and Gilbert have a fun meet-cute. She has good huffiness especially when it comes to Adams. This movie is wrongheaded at times but it's correct in its heart.

Lightly amusing little crime flick, thanks mainly to an authoritative Morgan, an officious Rogers, and an affable Carlson. We know from the outset that Morgan's Mr. Grant is high-up in government. But just how high-up remains a secret until the end. Seems he goes to little town of Crown Point for duck hunting. While there, however, he gets involved in challenging the town's corrupt officialdom from the mayor, to the municipal judge, to assorted town's people. Seems the mayor's being electorally challenged by Carlson's Bill Adams who's too soft, however, to succeed, so the seasoned Grant takes him under wing since his anti-corruption platform is deserving. In the process, Grant's lovely but officious aide Lucy Gilbert (Rogers) furnishes timely help. Nonetheless, the cards are stacked against them, so how will things turn out.

MGM's B-movie unit does a good job of combining a serious topic with some light-hearted humor, always a difficult trick to pull off. But they pull it off mainly with a good cast and Rowland's smooth directorial touch. Then too, the script does a good job of slowly revealing Grant's superior legal understanding to the consternation of both the floundering Adams and the corrupt town officials. Note too that the programmer's a product of its time, 1943, so the patriotic "citizen's duty" speech at the end is not surprising. Still, I'm wondering how a hundred guys can brawl without a single one one losing his hat. But then Hollywood is Hollywood. Anyway, the flick remains an engaging hour of MGM entertainment.

The title led me to expect a western but it in fact proved a very contemporary little comedy with a wonderful cast of character actors - including Frank Morgan in the lead - in which Hollywood shows its usual remarkable candour about the ease with which justice in the United States can fall prey to vested interests.

(It does take some believing that at some point corrupt judge Porter Hall wouldn't have thought that incognito Supreme Court judge Morgan looked a little familiar - even if Morgan had only been passing through on vacation at the time!)

Frank Morgan saves this formula-driven MGM comedy with an attempt at being Capraesque. His excessive sermonizing does not work well in this film, and the attempt by the director to imitate Capra fails. This B movie is, however, entertaining, and the predictable plot is overlooked with good-natured patience. It was a time that will never return to the US; and an innocence that no longer exists. Fun to watch.

A strange combination , corruption in a small town and comedy.

I am still not sure if this can be a good combination , maybe if you make it a sort of satire like Blazing saddles or Naked gun but this movie does not do that .

Instead it has really descent jokes combined with serious scenes of corruption from the mayor and the judge ( nothing to laugh about) .

So this combination makes it a strange movie because it seems that it does not take corruption very seriously or simplify it .

Maybe in the war time people wanted to laugh a litlle bit but still .

This was a low budget, grade B movie, but enjoyable nonetheless. Although silly at times, it kept your interest since it showed how decent citizens beat corrupt politicians at the own game. There are elements of this in many small towns. The movie was almost a satire on small town corruption.