Marriage Is a Private Affair (1944) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Gotta love that Lana
blanche-223 October 2010
Lana Turner was a true movie star, and she again proves it in this vehicle, "Marriage is a Private Affair," from 1944, which stars Lana with John Hodiak and James Craig. The Taylors, the Gables et al. were off fighting the war.

Turner plays a young woman, Theo, extremely popular with the men, who marries a soldier (Hodiak) whom she barely knows, Lieutenant Tom West. Nevertheless, they are happy at first, and have a son. But Tom's work keeps him busy for hours on end, and Theo starts to miss all the attention she once had. She also misses being perceived as a young beauty; now she's a married woman with a child. Because Theo comes from a family where her mother (Natalie Schaefer) was much married and divorced, Theo begins to worry that she's not cut out for marriage, especially when an old beau (Braig) puts the moves on her, and she's tempted.

"Marriage is a Private Affair" is overly long, and the script isn't much, but it was no doubt relevant in wartime when women married men in haste who then went overseas.

This film is really all Lana, absolutely gorgeous, with her beautiful face, figure, and soft speaking voice, a vivacious, flirtatious, and sexy woman who still had elements of a young girl. She really had something special. Later in her life, the energy drained from her, and the scandals, the smoking, drinking, and sun damage all took effect, even if she remained beautiful. But the effervescence was gone.

Back in the late '30s and into the '40s, Lana's star presence could - and did - elevate the most tedious of films. Later on, with the big sunglasses, fur coat and head covered with a scarf, she did, too, but for different reasons. This film is pleasant enough - without her, it wouldn't be worth watching. I highly recommend it if you're not familiar with the young Lana.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Does she still have IT?
bkoganbing27 November 2017
Marriage Is A Private Affair was the first film that Lana Turner did post the birth of her daughter Cheryl Crane. I guess that's what gives the scenes of Turner with her infant son in this film some special poignancy.

Turner is an irrepressible flirt, the kind who has to be the center of attention at all times. She gets that from her mother Natalie Schaefer who is on her latest husband Paul Cavanaugh. Schaefer has a Zsa Zsa Gabor like attitude toward marriage which she has passed on to her daughter.

But Lana does fall for and marry John Hodiak who is something of an inventor and considered necessary to the war effort so he can't activate his commission and get where the fighting is. They have a kid and it works for a while. But she gets bored and wants to see if she still is attractive even after marriage and childbirth. She tries flirting with flier James Craig to see if she still has it.

Marriage Is A Private Affair was also the first film Lana Turner did with billing alone above the title. She does a fine job as a girl who turns into a woman and finally decides to grow up. Her two leads Craig and Hodiak are also well cast in their parts.

Also in the cast are Herbert Rudley and Frances Gifford a seemingly happily married couple with some secrets and issues. Gifford is a lot like Turner. Hugh Marlowe is in this as well as a scientist friend of Hodiak's also anxious to get to war.

Probably had this film been done in about 10 years at least after the second World War we might have seen Turner more loose and slatternly, but during wartime there was no way Hollywood would show a star like Turner being less than true, flirting yes, but cheating a definite no-no.

True blue women is part of what we were fighting for.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Aimless Pseudo-Comedy Starring The Beautiful Lana Turner
atlasmb17 August 2014
First let me say that Lana Turner certainly looks beautiful in her role as a woman who has no idea what she wants. Well, she does like to be pursued. And occasionally she likes the idea of marriage.

This film is listed under the comedy genre. The few forays into the realm of comedy do not make this a comedy any more than her hallucinatory scenes of past lovers makes this a science fiction film. Actually, the film cannot decide what it wants to be. The swing from lighthearted banter to life-altering urgency and back prevents the viewer from fully investing emotionally in the perils of Theo (Ms. Turner).

The only thing to recommend this film are the beautiful people who populate it. And the photography and fashion that frame them.

The script must have been worked and reworked a hundred times by numerous scribes. It is so disjointed that in the end it leaves you wondering what it was all about. Yes, there is the neat "there's no place like home"-type attempt to put a neat ribbon on it all, but it rings hollow. Just look at the pretty people and smile.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What Soap Operas Reveal . . .
tjonasgreen22 March 2004
The product of a broken home who has been raised by her cynical, much-married mother, Lana Turner enters into the kind of hasty wartime marriage everyone in 1944 was being warned against. And the man she chooses is stable, romantic and old-fashioned. Uh-oh. This picture shows how 'women's films' and 'soap operas' could sometimes tackle modern life's most important moral and ethical situations. Turner's character wants to commit herself to her marriage but realizes she hasn't the experience or the emotional tools to be a good wife, nor does she have the example of her parents' happy marriage to follow. MARRIAGE IS A PRIVATE AFFAIR explores that dilemma and does it very entertainingly. Too bad Lana didn't take the film's theme to heart!

As the newlyweds, Turner and John Hodiak have a wonderful sensuality and seeming spontaneity together during the scenes that take place on their honeymoon as they are first getting to know each other. And the movie presents a very interesting moral complication when it introduces the threesome that are Hodiak's closest friends from childhood. Consisting of a married couple and their male pal, Hodiak idealizes them but Turner recognizes the sexual tensions that will eventually threaten that marriage. For those who assume that '40s films never dealt with sexual issues, this picture might be a refreshing surprise, especially since it came from MGM, Hollywood's most conservative studio.

And for those who generally think of Lana Turner's late films when you think of her at all, her work in this and other early '40s pictures might surprise you too. Looking ravishingly pretty with a lush but trim body, in these years Turner actually seems to look at and listen to her fellow actors, and speaks her lines with expression and emotion, a real contrast to her sluggish, lazy late work.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
(long) wartime story... with Lana
ksf-228 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Lovey Howell" (Natalie Schafer) tries to steal the opening scenes, but no-one could steal the show away from the beautiful Lana Turner. Turner is "Theo", the bride, who tries to keep her mother from butting in. James Craig is "Miles", the close friend, but she will marry "Tom West", a good soldier from Boston (John Hodiak). This was a WW II film, so of course, the issues of war, and getting married before one goes off to war were in everyone's mind. This was an earlier credited role for most of the cast, but it all comes off quite well. Not much of a deep story, but it's well done. Turner really lit up any scene, once they put a light on her. ( If you haven't seen Postman Always Rings Twice, it's her shining role!) The ups and downs of married life. It's a bit of war time propaganda... Lana always seems to be thinking out loud, voicing all her thoughts all the time, whether she's with her friends or her husband, almost in a child-like fashion. At one point, Theo looks at a sign that says "DO NOT ENTER".. and enters anyway, destroying army equipment. Seems pretty unrealistic. How entitled of her! About half way through, the plot goes off in other directions, and it gets more serious. It's almost two hours, but they could have done all this in shorter time. It's pretty good. I'm sure it carried more weight with folks who really were going through all these same issues during wartime. Directed by Robert Leonard, who had started EARLY in the silents.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mostly pretty shallow
vincentlynch-moonoi16 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
There's so much wrong with this movie, yet it managed to hold my attention till the end (albeit barely). To begin with, the plot here is thin. In fact, this is not a movie about plot. This movie is, quite simply, the story of a marriage, with all its highs and its lows, and in this film the lows of the marriage are the result of wife Lana Turner, who doesn't quite take marriage seriously. Perhaps it's because her mother didn't take marriage seriously, and that's what she learned marriage was like.

Another problem with this film is that it is just talk, talk, talk, talk, talk. Is spouses talking too much grounds for divorce? It should be!

The most interesting scene in the film is the uncomfortable dinner. I'll not give it away, but it's a gem, though it could have been done even better.

The acting here is mixed. Lana Turner is ravishing, living up to my expectation that in that era she was one of the two most beautiful women in the world (along with Sophia Loren). And, although in later on-camera interviews I found she was hardly a 100 watt bulb, she was a darned good actress...and is here.

I recently discovered John Hodiak. He's a good actor, but I think (as was later proved) that he was better as a supporting actor than in carrying and entire film. Too bad his life was cut so short.

In terms of supporting roles here, James Craig is good as the also-ran lover...watch...I should say listen to his performance...was his voice an intentional imitation of Clark Gable's?

I can't quite decide about the performance of Frances Gifford. More interesting was her own life -- check it out on Wikipedia.

I always thought Hugh Marlowe was a likable supporting actor, but clearly not destined for the big time (and he ended up in t.v. soaps). It's interesting to see Natalie Schafer ("the millionaire, and his wife"), here just as dumb acting as she was on Gilligan's Island...was it really acting? Herbert Rudley was also destined for television, and his performance here shows why. Keenan Wynn's role is not worth mentioning (and that particular skit is the dumbest 5 minutes of the movie). Not sweet or touching. Just dumb.

Robert Z. Leonard was the director here, and it's hard to believe that the man who directed a masterpiece like "The Great Ziegfeld" could hobble together a film this poor. Ah well, maybe the stretch from silent films to 1944 was just too long.

If you want a reason to watch this film, Lana Tuner's beauty will do it. But don't expect a great deal beyond that.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Never goes anywhere
ensiform28 July 1999
The makers of this film had a premise: a woman whose childhood makes her a rather flakey person, a bit unsure of herself, picks one of her many suitors just to see if she can. But from there, the movie forgets drama. Why should she come to embrace marriage? It's not the birth of her son. It's not any one thing that happens to her. There's no plot catalyst in this movie, no psychological edge. It's more like a soap opera, where the characters change for no particular reason.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Talk about ironic casting!
planktonrules17 August 2014
Lana Turner might have been a good actress, but her personal life was a mess. She was married seven times and none of them lasted very long. So, having her star in "Love is a Private Affair" is ironic indeed. The film seems inspired by her own life, as Theo (Turner) has been brought up by a spoiled and narcissistic mother (Natalie Schafer) who seems to get married about as often as most folks change their underwear! And, not surprisingly, Theo is ill-equipped for marriage. Only eventually does she realize that marriage is not about finding the perfect partner but about being able and mature enough to be married.

While this isn't a bad film and it is worth seeing, the film has two things working against it. First, having Turner star in a pro-marriage film is a bit ridiculous and today this sort of casting might make folks laugh. Second, and a more serious problem, is that the film takes a long time getting to Theo's sudden revelation and the happy ending. You know it's coming but the film seems to take forever getting there.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Is marriage a private affair or a ticker-tape affair?
JohnHowardReid4 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Copyright 22 July 1944 by Loew's Inc. A Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer picture. New York opening at the Capitol: 26 October 1944. U.S. release: October 1944. Australian release: 26 April 1945. 10,444 feet. 116 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: Lana played Theo Scofield, a New York playgirl, who "spends her winters in Miami and her summers in Reno," the latter while waiting for the next divorce of her much-married mother who tells her daughter "the first marriage, at least, should be romantic." On this theory, Theo marries Tom West, a fighter pilot on furlough, who is later grounded to handle an important war job in a laboratory.

After their baby is born, Theo devotes herself conscientiously to being a model wife and mother. She tries hard at first, but has little faith in her ability to make a good wife. She misses her carefree youth, her string of boyfriends, the glitter and glamour of being loved by a lot of men instead of just one. When she runs into Miles Lancing, an ex-beau, Theo is annoyed because he doesn't act as romantic as he once did. So she dons a sexy gown and heads for the Officers' Club to find him and recapture his attention.

But when she returns home that night she finds Tom angry because this was the night they were to celebrate their baby's first birthday. More misunderstandings and reconciliations follow.

COMMENT: For once you can get a fair idea of a film's quality from the Synopsis. Believe you me, this talking bore of a story isn't any more lively in the rendering than the reading. True, it's stylishly directed and has lush production values. Lana Turner looks most attractive in cinematographer Ray June's flattering close-ups. And she wears enough costumes, gowns and ensembles to make every female in the audience green with envy. When she starts perambulating through the sets that look as if furnished by Diamond Jim while she strums out an apparently endless series of bogus emotional problems, every feminine heart will flutter - and every male vocal chord will start screaming for the end title.

Trimmed of half its running time this Marriage Affair is passably entertaining. I once saw an expertly cut 65-minute version on TV. But as for 117 minutes of Mrs Lana T., leave her to the girls.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
marriage is a private affair
mossgrymk21 February 2021
As the somewhat Margaret Dumont-ish title would indicate this is a classic chick flic with acting and dialogue pitched squarely at the lady's magazine crowd; you know, lots of gasps, raised eyebrows, meaningful gazes and lines like "If you lie to me about the maple leaf, Tom, then..." However, if you can get past the foregoing, as well as the Hays Office BS (Double beds on a friggin HONEYMOON?) and Robert Z Leonard's rather placid direction, then there are some pleasures to be had. Not the least among them (gee, I'm starting to write like this film!) is Lana Turner's better than expected performance in the lead, especially in the scenes with her wayward, matrimony loving mom, played to comedic perfection by Natalie Schaefer about twenty years before her three hour cruise (By the way, RIP Dawn Welles. That leaves only Tina Louise on the island) and one of the more well staged disastrous dinner parties you'll see on celluloid. Give it a C plus. PS...It took about three days to get Bronislau Kaper's voluble, intrusive score outa my head.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Early Lana Turner Movie about Marriage
JLRMovieReviews8 February 2011
Lana Turner, in one of her earliest movies where she takes center stage and top billing, stars in this comedy-drama about marriage being nobody's business but the couple's. James Craig loves her, even though she marries John Hodiak. This does start off talking silly, as John proposes to her and on their honeymoon, but it's to the movie's credit and intelligence that it plays out very well in its treatment of its characters and make them very relate-able to the audience, the other characters being John's friends Sissy and Ted, a married couple, and Joe, played by Hugh Marlowe. Lana's mother (played by Natalie Shafer, who was Mrs. Howell from Gilligan's Island) was in and out of marriages all the time and did not provide Lana with a good role model. But, the viewer is left with the message that you should work in your own garden, before tending to someone else's, that you should go into it, knowing who you are and that all decisions have consequences. "Marriage is a Private Affair" is one of Lana's best unknown movies and needs to be discovered by more people today.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a neglected gem
amadain3118 November 2006
this is truly a collectors item. turner is at her most beautiful, all baby doll pout and velvet sincerity. production values are high. its a cult film that merits rediscovery. a big hit in 1944, it grossed 2 million at the box office, in the days when a hit was really a hit. audiences loved lana in her dimpled heyday and this film screens like a valentine to her sensuality. don't miss it. they don't make stars like lana anymore. gore vidal is on record as saying that he saw this film while young and that it had an impact on him. he mentioned it years later in myra breckinridge. tennesse williams worked on an early draft of the screenplay, and privately referred to it as a celluloid brassiere for miss turner!
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I liked it
awdude22 November 2002
I liked it. I thought it portrayed the struggles which many of us have. Lana Turner's character is undecided in life about quite a few issues, particularly marriage, though she also seems to have certain ideal views of these subjects. The last half of the movie I thought had the plot thicken so that her ambivalence would indeed make her character get stretched to the testing point. Actually quite a few testing points occur: with longtime boyfriend, husband, girlfriend, etc. After seeing the wreckage in her life and those around her, she does reach some mature decisions.

While we each may not have the same marriage commitment problem this movie showed, we can nonetheless use it as metaphor for our other personal struggles.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed