The Case of the Baby Sitter (1947) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
forty-minute crime drama with Tom Neal--entertaining but shallow
django-119 October 2003
Fans of 1940s B-movies would want to see ANY film starring Tom Neal as a detective, so here's one that won't take you long to watch, although you may have a vaguely unsatisfied feeling when it's over. This is the second of two "streamlined" features (films longer than shorts but shorter than even a 55 minute b-programmer) made in 1947 with the same cast and crew, starring Tom Neal as detective Russ Ashton, and running 40 minutes. They were intended to share a double-bill. The good news is that this film has a great b-movie supporting cast (Allen Jenkins as the comedic assistant detective, Pamela Blake as Neal's girlfriend/secretary, Tom Kennedy as a bumbling police officer, etc.), a hard-boiled feel yet a number of funny sequences, and the great Tom Neal as the private detective, cigarette dangling from his lip. The bad news is that the premise on which the plot is based is not that interesting and, in order to fit the whole thing into 40 minutes AND leave time for comedy sequences, the "crime"(which really happens BEFORE the film starts!)and sleuthing and resolution don't have much tension or drama attached. Also, I didn't have a stopwatch handy, but I'd bet that Allen Jenkins is in the film more than "star" Neal. When the phony duke and duchess hire Neal's detective agency to guard their baby and their valuables, Neal sends Jenkins and Neal stays at the office to do some paperwork! Only later when circumstances force him to be involved does he appear on the scene. Perhaps the earlier film THE HAT BOX MYSTERY spends some time establishing the character of Russ Ashton, but here he really isn't developed at all and isn't given any quirks or distinctive detection techniques that make him stand out. While many b-detective fans complain about Hugh Beaumont's depiction of Michael Shayne, where HB is throwing peanuts on the floor, at least those scripts gave Shayne some unique features. The film is not bad and the experience of watching it is a positive one. Also, it DOES have the authentic flavor of a poverty-row 1940s detective movie, so if you like the genre and have some time to kill, it's probably worth watching, but based on this feature, I'd have to judge the forty-minute "streamline" detective feature film experiment to be a mild failure. There's not really enough time to develop much tension.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Screenwriters Must Have Been Googoo Gaga
boblipton18 May 2023
A month and a half after the release of THE HAT BOX MYSTERY came this movie. Lambert Hillyer once again directed the broke-but-game detective agency of Tom Neal, Pamela Blake, and Allen Jenkins, with Virginia Sale slinging hash and hot for Jenkins. This time, they're asked to babysit a baby, who, they are told, is a Duke. Actually he's a front for a gang of jewel thieves, although why they need a detective agency to do so is beyond me. Complications pile on in what is supposed to be a funny way, and almost soon enough, it's over.

It's a very early released from the Lipperts, who were expanding from a theater chain into production, taking advantage of the connections of Hillyer, who dated back to the teens when he directed William S. Hart in some of his better features. As in their previous movies, the line readings depend more on the abilities of the actors, but here the opening visuals are attractively edited together.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Baby Sitting Case.
morrison-dylan-fan8 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
After watching the swift Film Noir The Hat Box Mystery again,I decided that I should try and track down the sequel.Looking round for the movie on its own,I was surprised to discover that the title had been included on VCI's Forgotten Noir.. Volume 9!,which led to me getting ready to open up the finally hat box.

The plot:

Performing a series of major robberies, thieves Phil and Mamie Russell decide to steal a baby and pretend to be an upper-crust family.Setting their sights on a big robbery,the Russell's decide to hire a guy from the local detective agency (!) called Howard 'Harvard' Quinlan to look after the baby.Whilst looking after the baby,Quinlan spots the baby playing with a sharp object (which unknown to him is a stolen jewel.)Shortly after,the baby spills milk which leads to the jewel slipping into Quinlan's pocket.Paying a visit to Quinlan's girlfriend, detectives Russ Ashton & Susan 'Susie' Hart are surprised to find that Quinlan had a stolen jewel on in his hands.

View on the film:

Throwing it on as one of three movies,VCI give the movie a surprisingly good transfer,with a clear soundtrack and a clean picture (how did no one see that boom shadow?!)

Driving pass at 40 minutes,the screenplay by Carl K. Hittleman/Ande Lamb & Myron A. Nunes set things rolling with a "ripped from the headlines" Film Noir opening.Turning down the Noir noise from the first movie,the writers largely focus on light Screwball Comedy,which disappointingly drains the mystery of any tension.Although they are pushed to the side,the returning Tom Neal and Pamela Blake still give sassy Noir performances as Ashton and Hart,whilst Allen Jenkins gets into the comedic spirit as Quinlan,as the baby sitter opens the hat box.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Thin, fast, silly, curious. Not a total wash, but close.
secondtake3 March 2010
The Case of the Baby Sitter (1947)

Wow, a 41 minute film noir? Not really. Yes, it's 41 minutes, thankfully. A cardboard movie with a weirdly complicated plot. It had potential. John Huston could have made it a gem, no pun intended, but B-movie director Lambert Hillyer keeps it silly and fast. The main problem is an intention from scene one to be entertaining, so there are goofy jokes and bad guys who aren't really very scary.

So, why watch this film? For Lona Andre and her famously pretty face? Or for Tom Neal and his cutely handsome face, and in a very reduced role for him? (Both actors had roles in many other films like this, including together in the parallel Hat Box Mystery, some not as bad as this one.) Or maybe watch for character actor Allen Jenkins, who had some good side roles in larger films? Sure, for those really into the period. It's not horrible.

But to just watch this straight on, get on your elliptical and let it happen. As short as it is, it gets a little confusing, with many of the characters taking on roles within their roles--the jewel thieves are pretending to be a rich couple incognito, the club owner is an ex-con, and even the babysitter (Jenkins) is dressed up, fairly incidentally, in someone else's clothes. If you can watch closely, the plot and its intentional twists have potential. The movie has the flavor of the times, made lighthearted, which is always enjoyable for us fans of noir. But there is little else. Except a smile at the end.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Why only 41 minutes in length?
planktonrules21 September 2023
The story is about a gang that are looking to kidnap a baby. Fortunately, the police are vigilant and the criminals aren't particularly talented.

"The Case of the Baby Sitter" is an odd short. This is because it really isn't exactly a B-movie (they usually ran from 55-70 minutes) but it's much longer than a typical short at 41 minutes. I have no idea why they chose to make a film of this length, but it offered a few problems---most notably some actors talking VERY fast or talking over other actors...presumably to make the film end sooner. A few of the actors come off better, such as Allen Jenkins playing a dopey detective. Overall, not bad but certainly not good either. Worth seeing mostly if you adore classic films...otherwise you could do better.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More Fit for TV Anthology than Theatrical Release
mark.waltz18 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I'd like to start off by saying that this actually isn't a film noir. It's a crime drama missing a few of the ingredients that turn such films into noir. It's like the difference between a cake and a pancake; Add the yeast and you've got something that rises above its flatness. This is probably closer to MGM's "Crime Doesn't Pay" Series, padded out for theatrical release as a feature rather than a short. Allen Jenkins, a veteran of Warner Brothers' best gangster films of the 30's, is the baby sitter of the title, a private detective of questionable smarts, who is trying to break up a jewel theft ring, and must babysit a cute little tyke in order to prevent jewel thieves from taking the valuables of a supposed Duke and Duchess. But they are actually jewel thieves themselves, using the son of the fake duchesses' sister to hide their true identities. A rival gang (where the moll highly resembles the fake duchess) wants the jewels they've got, and Jenkins is slipped a mickey so they can switch the real jewelry with fakes. Tom Neal and Pamela Blake are top-billed as a detective and his secretary/girlfriend, but it is Jenkins and feisty waitress Virginia Sale who get more to do in this 40 minute "streamlined" feature. For some reason, it still seems to move slowly, like the comic relief of Jenkins and Sale was padded out more. Why? So this would get Oscar consideration? No threat to either "Trouble in Paradise" or "Jewel Robbery", or the much later "To Catch a Thief". There is some slight amusement, but if you watch the triple feature DVD actually expecting film noir from this, you'll be most disappointed. Even as a generic crime drama (with forced comic overtones), it is weak and mostly dull.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
the baby was cute
blanche-218 May 2020
Tom Neal was an attractive man with a nice presence; unfortunately, his personal life far outshone his professional. Here he stars in "The Case of the Baby Sitter" from 1947, right out of poverty row. The cast consists of Allen Jenkins, Pamela Blake, and Tom Kennedy.

A Duke and Duchess hire the Ace Detective Agency to babysit their infant while thy go out. Russ Ashton (Neal) wangles an assistant, Harvard (Jenkins) to take over the job.

Unfortunately, this duke and duchess are not royalty, except in the world of jewel thieves. They have the recently-stolen La Paz diamond, and the baby nephew of the "Duchess" (Lola Andre) is a front for what they're really up to. The poor kid's mother thinks he's vacationing in a warm resort climate.

Another group is after the diamond and steal it after doping poor Harvard.

This is a short film, and while it's a pleasant watch, there's hardly enough plot even for 47 minutes. Its appeal is mainly in the fact that it stars bad-boy Neal, who after putting Franchot Tone in the hospital, eventually went to prison for manslaughter after his wife was shot in the head. Eight months after his release, he died.

It's a shame - Neal had Broadway experience and a law degree from Harvard. Hard to believe.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Acting is more than adequate
oscar-3516 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
*Spoiler/plot- 1947, Case of the Baby Sitter, Jewel thieves operating in the guise of Dike and Duchess hires Ace Detective Agency to 'baby sit' and infant that they are using as a blind for their gem thefts. A rival mob group dopes the detective's dumb aide and make off with a valuable large diamond.

*Special Stars- Brooklyn's Allen Jenkins plays the rough detective aide & partner and finally the baby sitter. Tom Neal as the detective. Pamela Blake plays his girl assistant.

*Theme- Not all babies are innocent of crimes.

*Based on- Story by Carl Hittleman and Ande Lamb

*Trivia/location/goofs- New York city back-lot studio locations. Some lost seldom seen film noir of the early 50's. DVD has some nice special features on film noir.

*Emotion- A watchable but somewhat flat plot line even though the casting and acting is more than adequate. Allen Jenkins is a fun & recognizable face for his hundreds of films done at Warner Brothers playing a Brooklyn street tout.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed