The Secret Fury (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
40 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Intriguing drama
blanche-22 February 2006
Claudette Colbert is a wealthy woman driven to near insanity in "The Secret Fury," also starring Robert Ryan and Jane Cowl. On her wedding day, a man appears who claims that an heiress, Ellen (Colbert), is already married. An investigation ensues, and the evidence is against her. When her "husband" is murdered in her presence, she is put on trial.

This looked to me like a B movie, and it made for very compelling watching. My only quibble with it - and it's not a minor one - is that I was very disappointed with the ending. The motive for the crime seemed preposterous.

Robert Ryan plays Ellen's fiancé, and it's a different role for him. Here he's heroic and likable rather than villainous.

One of the most interesting things about the film is Vivian Vance in a small but showy role. She's excellent as a hotel maid who recognizes Ellen and verifies that she was indeed married before. It was a treat to see her do something besides Ethel Mertz.

Claudette Colbert is very good as the troubled woman. She's not a natural fit for the role, being more at home in comedy, but she makes it work. She's very believable as an older woman seeking happiness only to have it snatched from her at the last minute.

Mel Ferrer directed this very well, and I recommend it, though I wasn't crazy about the ending.
35 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
interesting, tricky mind game
zeula7 November 2002
I was surprised, that ''The Secret Fury'' was an enjoyable good film...... Probably because, I didn't have any expectations for this movie..... Though, the film does have it's plot holes..... I would say, that you couldn't guess who was behind the whole scheme, until the very end of the movie..... At first, I thought, it was Robert Ryan, using the same method, like ''Gaslight'' where husband tries to drive his wife mad, but I was wrong...... The main problem, with the movie is, they drive at a whole other direction, which gave no clues at the beginning...... I thought, Robert Ryan & Claudette Colbert carried their parts well...... Plus, Vivian Vance, a fine character actress, who steals scenes in this one...... Those who like movies, that keeps you guessing, will like this one......
32 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An exceptional movie up until the end,...
planktonrules16 October 2006
This movie was terrific and even with a less than convincing ending, it's still well worth seeing. The film begins as Claudette Colbert is about to marry Robert Ryan. When the minister asks if anyone has any objections, a guy jumps up and announces that Colbert CAN'T get married because she already is married!! Colbert insists this isn't true, but when they investigate they find that the Justice of the Peace and many others remember her wedding and there is even a signed wedding license! Slowly, it becomes apparent that Claudette's mind is slipping and people around her seriously doubt her sanity. Then, when the supposed first husband is murdered, all evidence and suspicion falls on Colbert.

The film is an exciting mystery suspense film, as what I have so far described is only the first half of the movie. What follows is amazingly intelligent and captivating. Unfortunately, the conclusion, though, is a bit of a let-down, as the guiding force behind all this turns out to come "right out of left field"--and is baffling since it was so unexpected and impossible to guess based on the information given to the viewer. However, in spite of this, the film was so good, I can even excuse the limp ending. In particular, Robert Ryan did a great job as the "knuckle-busting" fiancé, though apart from him the other performances were also excellent.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Does Anyone Have Just Cause"
bkoganbing12 August 2011
The great acting of Claudette Colbert and Robert Ryan covers up in The Secret Fury a rather over the top melodramatic story with a really baffling conclusion. It will never be rated at the top ten of either Colbert and Ryan's film credits.

It sure begins ordinarily enough in fact rather amusingly as Ryan has a bit of trouble getting into his own wedding as he's in a suit and everyone else has a tuxedo (Ryan is carrying his tux) and no one will let him tell them he's the groom.

But when the minister asks if anyone has just cause why Colbert and Ryan should not wed, a stranger pushes in and says that Colbert is already married to his friend and he was best man at the wedding. The stranger is Dave Barbour and when they check on his story it seems true enough as Colbert can't provide a real reason not since on the day of 'wedding' she apparently spent it alone.

Later on the 'husband' is found dead in a closed room with Colbert and she's put on trial for murder and totally cracks up on the stand as the gaslighting is proving too much.

I can say this much without giving away the ending. Usually in films like this you will find Bob Ryan behind the evil scheme, but in this case he's stalwart and true and doesn't stop believing in Claudette. He continues sleuthing on his own and in the end the real villain is discovered with a motive that will leave you scratching your head.

This film will offer you the opportunity to see stage legend Jane Cowl as Colbert's aunt and Vivian Vance as a hotel maid in a role quite different than Ethel Mertz. Still it's the stars who put over a rather incredible and incredulous story for your viewing pleasure.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What's a "Noosnow"?
dougdoepke25 April 2010
Is Ellen (Colbert) losing her mind—is she already married? The trouble is what she remembers happening is not what a bunch of other people remember. So what's going on.

About half way through, the movie turns from high-key lighting into noir. But then Ellen's fiancée is the great noir icon Robert Ryan. Except here, he's basically a good guy, although those inventive opening scenes where he can't get into his own wedding prove he's a quirky sort. Colbert gets to show her acting chops by running through about every emotion in the book. And I couldn't help thinking of the previous year's The Snake Pit (1948) as I watched her breakdown.

It's a tense, riveting mystery as we try figuring out what's going on. Ellen seems so convincing, but then so does the damning evidence against her. The screenplay effectively draws the noose ever tighter around Ellen's sanity up till the end. Then the script nosedives with some ridiculous motivation that's just too implausible to fly (without giving it away). Too bad, since the movie could have excelled without this unfortunate lapse.

There's one scene that intrigued me. Hoping to unravel the mystery, Ellen and David enter what looks like a spacious, well-lit livingroom. There, what only can be described as a cutting-edge jazz ensemble is laying out the cool sounds of the time. Draped languorously across a couch is an equally cool-looking blonde. It's a highly suggestive scene, and clearly an effort at creating exotic atmosphere. But, the banal setting and the high-key lighting drain the needed visual impact. It's almost like someone (director Ferrer, the producers?) was afraid of too much "atmosphere", (contrast with the super-evocative jazz scene in the classic DOA {1950}). Thus, a potential highlight is allowed to pass by.

All in all, it's unfortunate that the fine acting, inventive touches, and genuine suspense are challenged by a key lapse in the plausibility of the screenplay. Otherwise it's an effective little thriller.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ethel Mertz as mercenary maid is reason enough to watch
bmacv29 August 2001
The Secret Fury, in many ways a run-of-the-mill romantic suspense drama (directed by Mel Ferrer) boasts top-notch principals in Colbert and Ryan; it stays puzzling if not quite gripping until towards the end, when implausibility conquers suspension of disbelief -- as so often it does in this genre. But for some viewers the film's highlight will be the portrayal of blowsy Leah by Vivian Vance -- the immortal Ethel Mertz on "I Love Lucy." Oddly, Vance had very few film roles; her true home was Broadway, where (among other gigs) she understudied for Ethel Merman. Here she contributes a winning turn as a chambermaid suborned to play a minor part in a nefarious scheme; watch her half-heartedly trying to wave away the smoke when she's puffing a furtive cigarette in the hotel's linen-storage room -- a transgression for which she ultimately pays the supreme penalty.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The secret is sticking with it. The fury is how long it takes to grab you.
mark.waltz25 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This film noir has an interesting setup. Well-known pianist Claudette Colbert is preparing to marry Robert Ryan and on their wedding day is confronted by evidence that she has married another man. There are a bunch of witnesses who can attest to this fact, including Justice of the Peace Percy Helton and cheap hotel maid Vivian Vance. Colbert ends up in a mental institution where she is treated by psychiatrist Elisabeth risdon while her aunt Jane Cowl and Ryan try to discover the truth.

Slow pace is both an aid and a hindrance in making this a memorable film, and as the secrets are revealed and the culprit revealed, it becomes more intriguing. Advance has particularly effective as the plain talking chambermaid who pays dearly for going against the perpetrators of this scheme to drive Colbert mad. Having appeared in many dramatic films and even a thriller ("Sleep My Love"), Colbert proves herself to be more than just a life comedian, but her character is depressing. She's effective in her mad scenes but it's not one of her most uplifting films. Still, it's a difficult film to dislike because it is intriguing and is one of those films that will have you drawn in spite of its faults.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
great premise
SnoopyStyle27 August 2020
Ellen R. Ewing (Claudette Colbert) is overjoyed to be marrying David McLean (Robert Ryan). She's from a rich upper class family and he's a regular guy. As the ceremony begins, a stranger stands up and claims that Ellen is already married. The man runs away but the marriage certificate is uncovered. Ellen struggles to prove her innocence as she is confronted by evidences and witnesses which are driving her mad.

I really love the premise. It has Hitchcockian flavor. I do have a problem with Randall's murder. I would like for the thug to reveal how it was done. Also during that waterboarding scene, David should be threatening him with the gun. It doesn't look right if all he's doing is putting him under the faucet. It all gets resolved too quickly. The thug should be revealed to be final villain and more time can be given to David's investigation. I also have an issue with Noosnom. It's unlikely that she remembers it that way. The movie needs to use a window or mirror to do the reflecting while the boat is hidden in some way. These are minor flaws that need to be cleaned up.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Colbert and Ryan make it work
reve-219 February 2000
In the hands of lesser actors than Claudette Colbert and Robert Ryan this film could have become silly and trite. But, with these two experienced thespians leading the way, I found "Silent Fury" to be a most exciting and pleasurable little mystery. When their wedding is interrupted by a stranger who claims that Colbert is already married, and that he was best man at that wedding, one can sense that there is some sort of plot against her at work. As Colbert, Ryan, and her attorney set out to disprove the strangers claim of a prior marriage, they are met at every turn by more evidence that seems to reinforce the claim that she is indeed already wed. Although it's not very difficult to figure out just who the main "baddie" is, it's still lots of fun as the intensity and pace of the story increases. All in all, a good, solid mystery film with fine performances by the two leading actors and a fine supporting cast which includes the often underrated Paul Kelly.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice little puzzler
rebekahrox28 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not going to regurgitate the plot. I agree with the other reviewers who were a little disappointed in the ending. I sure did not guess who was gas lighting her or why. I also found it a little unbelievable that the sweet old justice of the peace and his wife and housekeeper would be in on the plot. They should have made another appearance where their motivations and lies were exposed. How did the Vivian Vance character get Claudette's pin? How was Lucian Randall shot if Claudette didn't do it? I admit I may have missed some of the exposition.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
If my credulity is to be strained, I want more of a payoff than this
meaninglessname14 July 2020
As you must know by now, lovely bride-to-be Claudette Colbert's wedding is interrupted, then canceled, when a stranger insists she was married before in another town, and phone calls to its bureau of records seem to confirm it.

We strongly suspect she did no such thing because she's the star after all, and she seems too busy as a concert pianist to have led this alleged double life. But all sorts of people in the other town claim to confirm it.

I don't think it's giving away too much to reveal that it was all indeed a conspiracy. Nothing wrong with that dramatically, but the main perpetrator's motive turns out be something of which we were given no inkling, and the plot against Claudette is so involved and complicated it would have required at least the CIA, not a fairly ordinary person, to pull off.

The film is well made and suspenseful and all that, but for me the final explanation was just too far-fetched and left me feeling a bit cheated.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Keeps you guessing
artqua11 August 2021
It is a mystery and a thriller from 1950. I have enjoyed Claudette Colbert and Robert Ryan in other movies, so I thought I would check it out. This story kept me interested and, yes, thrilled!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Robert Ryan for once "the goody"
howardmorley5 December 2016
I rated this movie 6/10 mainly because apart from the good acting of Robert Ryan, Claudette Colbert was directed in an unconvincing way by Mel Ferrer.The most ludicrous scene she had was when she mentally breaks down in the witness box during the murder trial scene and she never convinced as a concert pianist as the director used the old trick of filming her from angles which did not disclose her hand positions.In films about famous pianists with Hollywood actors playing the musician, a good edit has a close up of a professional pianist's hands then cuts to a head and shoulders of the actor.The big fault in the screenplay was supposing every character could be bribed to agree to the same lie.Surely moral turpitude in America was not so base in 1950 especially after the big lie of Hitler 5 years before.The movie gained my attention for its duration and I was pleasantly surprised by the rather Agatha Cristie-like ending.It had its pros (exciting story that kept one guessing and cons (improbability) and this was my first viewing.I recently saw "Since You Went Away" (1944) when Claudette Colbert was better cast in her role as a mother of two daughters whose husband has been called up into the U.S. Army during WW11.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Middling Minor Noir with a good first half
mackjay25 June 2020
Intriguing, but ultimately preposterous noir melodrama with a hysterical performance from Claudette Colbert. It's understandable that Colbert is upset. Her wedding to Robert Ryan is interrupted by a man saying she is already married. Several people back him up and it's pretty convincing. Ryan's having his doubts, and Colbert is doubting her own sanity. A murder takes place and it leads to a trial staged in two of the silliest courtroom scenes ever. The first half of the film is pretty good, thanks to the intrigue, but it can't sustain credibility. No spoilers on the outcome. Roy Webb is credited with an overwrought score, using a piano theme by Robert Schumann that we hear in variations -- the same tune that obsesses Joan Crawford throughout POSESSED (1947). There's some interest in the cast though: Paul Kelly, Paul Picerni, an uncredited Jose Ferrer (no relation to director Mel), Philip Ober and his then-wife Vivian Vance who is quite good in one of her few, but this time memorable, film parts before she became the immortal "Ethel Mertz".
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superb, and a very different Claudette Colbert
vincentlynch-moonoi14 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't know what this film was about, but I watched it because I really enjoy Claudette Colbert. For the first few minutes I thought it was a comedy. The bridegroom can't get into the house because he doesn't look the part. Then, when the wedding party is asked, "If anyone here knows of any reason why this couple should not be wed...", and someone stands up and objects. Very quickly, however, it becomes clear it's not a comedy, and for the first third of the film we wonder what is going on here? Could the Colbert character really already have a husband and was about to commit bigamy? Not so far off a typical soap opera-ish 1940s drama. But then, suddenly, at the "jazz house", it becomes clear this is a 1950s film, and a very different tone emerges as it appears that Colbert has shot her first, secret husband. It becomes nearly film noir. And, the ending is a humdinger! Colbert is superb here, but this is not the Colbert you're used to seeing. Insane? She's in an asylum! Nervous breakdown? She's hysterical! A bravura performance.

I don't typically like Robert Ryan, but in this film he's very good.

This is a very solid mystery, not to be missed by Colbert fans.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I planned this too well, I Won't Have It Spoiled Now!
sol121814 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** At their big wedding ceremony just as both the groom David McLean, Robert Ryan, and the bride Ellen Ewing, Claudtte Colbert, are about to say "I Do" this party, or wedding, crasher pops up out of nowhere. The crasher then announces that Ellen is already married and that he should know since he was the best man at her wedding. Giving out some information about what he knows about Ellen and her husband a Mr. Lucian Randell, David Barbour, the crasher takes off like a house on fire never to be heard or seen again. Thats until very late in he film when his reasons for putting on this strange surprising spectacle become very evident.

The priest is reluctant to continue with the marriage ceremony when what the crasher said checks out after a quick phone call by the town of Riverview's District Attorney Eric Lowell,Paul Kelly, where the supposed wedding took place. It turns out from the towns record department that it's a fact that a Ellen Ewing and Lucian Randell were indeed married there on March 21 just as the wedding gate crasher said before he took off!

Left high and dry on their wedding day both David and Ellen decide to travel to Riverview and get to the bottom of this mystery so they can get on with their lives as a happily married couple. At Riverview it turns out that not only do the records check out that Ellen is married to a Mr. Randell but that everyone there recognizes her as being married to him! Staying at the Shallman Hotel Ellen is even more shocked when the maid Leah, Vivian Vance, not only recognizes her as staying there, in fact in the very same room that she's now in with David, with Lucian Randell on their wedding night but also has a gold pin, that belonged to Ellen's late mother, that Ellen supposedly gave her as a tip!

It just get's too much for David and Ellen with everyone that they talk to in town remembering Ellen and Mr. Randell being married there and finally decide to see this Randell for themselves. Finding out that Randell hangs out at this local jazz club both Ellen and David go to see him and get to the bottom of this mess once in for all. At the club Randell comes up the a shocked and befuddled Ellen, to the annoyance of David, and chats with her as if he and her were married to each other. He then invites Ellen to go into a private room to talk things over as David is left behind paralyzed with his jaw almost dropping to the floor. A moment later behind closed doors a shot rings out and when the musicians and David rush in they find Randall dead from a bullet wound and Ellen standing there in a state of shock with a gun that belongs to her, the murder weapon, at her feet!

Arrested for her "husbands" murder Ellen goes into a deep depression that has her institutionalized but all the psychological and medical tests on her shows that Ellen is total incapable of committing a violent act! If this is true who was in the room with her and Randell to gun Randell down? Was it Ellen or did Randall who seemed so happy and gay at the time, commit suicide? Why if anyone did murder Randell why didn't Ellen see it?

The movie "The Secret Fury" gets more and more stranger as it goes along and as Ellen slowly loses her mind and grip on reality. David goes back to Riverview to find out the truth about his future wife and circumstances of Randell's death and the truth turns out to be even stranger then fiction or what we were lead to believe that it was up until then!

The mind is not only a terrible thing to waste but even more a terrible thing to play around with and manipulate. This is what happens in "The Secret Fury" with poor Ellen being driven insane and into a mental institution hopefully, in the mind of the person who's driving Ellen mad, for the rest of her life. The real murderous psychotic in the movie is someone who no one, especially Ellen, would ever suspect and his reasons for doing these terrible things to Ellen are even more insane that he is!

The killer made one big mistake in his subconscious and innocent quirks that are at first totally overlooked by everyone, including Ellen, in the film. It just happened that as Ellen became more and more psychotic, or paranoid, her subconscious mind picked up these quirks and putting two and two together she soon realized who the person is.

Getting the jump on Ellen the killer ,who also picked up Ellen picking up his very unusual mannerisms, quickly goes into attack mode revealing the real reason for his actions, cold blooded and naked revenge, but not for what she but her late father did to him. This sets off the final nail-biting scene where David comes to Ellen's rescue without knowing what exactly is going on and who exactly is trying to murder her until the very last, and most exciting, moment in the movie.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good for Claudette fans
HotToastyRag15 April 2023
When Claudette Colbert walks down the aisle to marry Robert Ryan, she thinks the rest of her life will be wedded bliss. She has no idea that someone will shout, "I object!" and charge her with bigamy. Sorry, folks, but you should know by now that Robert Ryan isn't just going to get the girl in the first five minutes and sail off into the sunset. Even when he gets the chance to play a good guy, there are lots of obstacles in his path.

The Secret Fury is a psychological thriller, so if you like movies like Gaslight, you can check it out. I'm not giving a spoiler alert, by the way; I'm only comparing the two movies because an innocent woman starts to question her sanity. Though made in 1950, it does feel melodramatic like movies made in the previous decade. Claudette has a definite style to her acting, so if you're looking for something more modern or original, you won't find it in this movie. If you do like her, though, and you want to see her paired with Mr. Tall, Dark, and Handsome, give it a shot. It's entertaining if you are prepared for something a little on the soapy side.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"There Is Evidence Of Psychotic Shock"
davidcarniglia9 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A couple is getting married; but a guy comes forward to say that the bride is already someone's wife. What's the deal? Well, David (Robert Ryan) and Ellen (Claudet Colbert) are going to find out.

Ominously, no one in the house staff seems to know David when he arrives at the wedding mansion. Ellen's aunt Claire (Jane Cowl) jokes a bit with her that she was supposed to have married Eric (Paul Kelly). Then we meet Ellen's guardian, Gregory (Philip Ober). Time for the ceremony.

She was married to Lucien (Dave Barbour) says the interloper. It checks out. She wasn't where she was supposed to have been that day; in fact she was in the town where the previous ceremony took place. But she claims to not even know Lucien. Now we get the backstory from Claire that Ellen had been close to a breakdown.

Sure enough, It's her signature on the marriage documents with Lucien. When they go to see the officiant at the Lucien/Ellen wedding, everyone recognizes her. Now even Claire and Eric start to doubt her. The consensus is they've got to find this Lucien to find out what's going on.

We find Ellen alone, thinking back: a flashback. Her on the beach, by a swanky house, with a guy. When she gets away from the memory, Ellen immediately phones David. She claims that she's cleared up the whole mess. The hotel maid recalls her honeymoon though, with Lucien, that is. "Nice seeing you again." The maid pops back in just as David arrives.

Her memory that ends with her holding a seashell doesn't mean much; she was with a guy. Later, they go to see Lucien, who's with a bunch of musicians. Lucien approaches her, calls her his wife. She is taken aback: how does he know her? It becomes stranger when a shot is heard from the closed room. He's been shot dead.

Of course she's the one and only suspect. She insists that not only did she not kill Lucien, she'd never met him before. No prints on the gun, anyway. It was Claire's gun. Actually, Eric, who's the D.A., had been Ellen's jilted boyfriend (also the loudmouth at the wedding). David is so upset he slugs the D.A.

Later, David comes to Gregory's office with maybe some good news. It seems that Lucien was a blackmailer; that's no good, though, as that gives Ellen more of a motive. A former lover of Lucien's related that he thought that Ellen was dangerous. With Ellen on the stand, Eric implies that she'd been blackmailing Lucien.

Gregory objects in that Eric is not only defaming her, but his personal interest in the case means his intrinsically biased. She starts to lose it; Gregory changes her plea to "guilty by reason of insanity." She's being evaluated at an institution for diagnostic purposes; no "unconscious aggression" detected.

David talks to Claire--she pretty much thinks that Ellen's lost. Nonetheless, he goes to the institution; the doctor says Ellen's living in an "opaque" world. He goes through her things, and finds the tell-tale seashell. Maybe more clues at the beach? Hmm, back to the county records office to check up on the clerk's memory of Ellen.

That guy remembers a scar on her hand. Next stop is the hotel where Ellen stayed recently. Now the maid doesn't remember "the Randall's". He plans to meet her at her room later; looks like a set-up. Very noirish atmosphere: sure enough, amid shadows and lights, she gets strangled before David gets there. So, he finds the body, and the murder weapon.

Wisely, he leaves. Some creepy possibilities; like a guy lurking in his backseat set to strangle him. It's the interloper from the wedding, a friend of Lucien's. Screeching to a halt, David runs away from the car--pretty soon they're fighting. David wins. Yeah, the guy framed Ellen. The judge and make were paid to act their parts in this plot. He killed the maid--but Lucien?

Leave that problem for the cops. On the way there, though, Eric manages to hurl himself out of the car. Is he dead too? Back at the institution, Ellen's playing away at the piano. David and Gregory come by to fill her in. She seems catatonic. "We have proof that you never married (Lucien) Randle." And she could have killed him either.

She comes to life, but then freaks out. What's going on with her now? At her family home, she, David, Claire, Eric and Gregory get together-"she's not insane, she never was" says David. Really? She pulls a gun on Claire and Gregory." To Gregory: "You had me locked up like an animal!" Aha! It's Gregory who's the bad guy; he'd likewise been put-away by her father years before.

It's literally kill or be killed. She has the gun. She knows, that, given her history, she'll never see the light of day if she pulls the trigger. Fortunately, David intervenes: but she looks like the nut, ranting and raving, holding a gun on Gregory. Pleading with David, Eric shows his hand, so to speak, by wielding an ax. David manages to push him back; a falling hunk of debris finishes him off. The end.

The last half hour or so is very good noir; the rest is a decent mystery. That's ok, but there's a substantial change in tone and atmosphere. It's like half a Hitchcock movie. The ending leaves some loose ends, but the revelation that the trusted Gregory is the bad guy is enough to let things fall into place.

The main problem is Eric's unseemly presence in the courtroom. There's just no way that he would've been an appropriate choice as prosecutor. I see that it was Gregory's strategy to allow this, dingbat Ellen wouldn't walk away. And, again in half-Hitchcock style, the nutty, ax-wielding Gregory is sort of conjured out of thin air from his previous avuncular role. It's an interesting subplot, but it's just too much of a switch, too abruptly.

Almost as contrived is Ellen's "sickness." I understand that mental states can be episodic, but she seems to lose it as if on cue. A breakdown in a courtroom doesn't equate to a total breakdown, it's a reaction to stress.

There's enough good stuff here to entertain us; but it's a bit disappointing, nonetheless.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A secret fury
guswhovian18 September 2020
A woman (Claudette Colbert) is about to marry her fiancé (Robert Ryan) when someone interrupts the wedding claiming she is already married - an event she has no recollection of.

The Secret Fury is an entertaining thriller reminiscent of Gaslight. The plot takes a while to get going, and the courtroom antics in the middle are deathly dull, but the last half-hour that has Robert Ryan investigating is very entertaining. Claudette Colbert isn't in it very much, which is probably a good thing, as she's very hammy. Robert Ryan fares much better as her fiancé, giving a solid performance. Jane Cowl is good as Colbert's aunt, while Vivian Vance has quite a different role from Ethel Mertz as a low-life hotel maid. Mel Ferrer's direction is surprisingly good.

Overall, it's not very original, but it's entertaining.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
They must have changed the ending at the last minute.
jimmh-309-69293812 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Just saw it on TMC. The contents of the movie slowly aims at the aunt being the villain, with the motive of getting Ellen out of the way in order to gain an inheritance. I believe that for some unknown reason the writers came up with the implausible ending.

I thought that the movie was pretty well done. I think the fight scene between Ryan and the killer was filmed in subdued lighting because of the use of a stand in for Ryan.

Even though Ryan's '49 Buick was pretty big, it seemed that Ryan took a long time to realize that there was someone in the back seat. Also, how come when the Buick crashed into the trash cans there was no damage to the right front. I guess Buick were built pretty strong back then.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would be a good movie if redone today
billsoccer23 September 2020
On a woman's wedding day, events occur which indicate she's already married. Further events tend to corroborate the first marriage. The director does a great job of eventually causing us to suspect everyone. If done today - with better actors (Colbert is not very believable in this) - it would probably rival Gaslight
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
By the end I was laughing at how bad it was.
mptnla-8237015 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
At first I was interested in "the mystery" of this film. Had Ellen Ewing really married someone else? I assumed not, but was interested to see how it would be resolved. What ensued was just a load of nonsense and I found myself predicting what was next -- "he'll see the reflection of the boat in the water" and "well that's a precarious way to store a large mirror." Oh, and I forgot about the seashell in the pocket of her jacket. I could only imagine this all started with these clues and someone decided to write a movie script around them.

Claudette Colbert is way too good an actress for this, but her wide-eyed I-didn't-do-this-look wore on my last nerve about 30 minutes in. The other frustration was we go straight from a murder scene into prosecuting the case --which by the way was going to be handled by her jilted ex-lover (really?!), and the only clue we're provided with is that "the gun fell on the floor" and whoever did it was wearing gloves. And tough guy Robert Taylor was wasted on this. The best he was given to work with was trying to drown a guy under a spigot on the street.

Of course I deduced the actual villain, but assumed it was to get at Ellen's money. Instead, in the last five minutes the feeble motive was given that it was punishment for having been put in an asylum by Ellen's father, so if she killed him he would have his revenge of her being confined to an asylum too...or if she didn't, he'd kill HER. Why not just do that at the outset and spare us all 126 minutes of a story that doesn't hold together? I literally was laughing at the end at how ridiculous it was. Ugh!
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic Film of the 50's
whpratt122 September 2005
When ever a film is produced or directed by Mel Ferrer, you can bet your life any of his pictures will be seen for generation after generation. Just having Claudette Colbert,(Ellen R. Ewing),"The Egg & I",'47 appearing and starring in the film will make it even more of a great Classic Film. In this film, Ellen Ewing gets married and then she encounters all kinds of mental problems and even murder. The mystery gets very much involved and Robert Ryan,(David McLean),"Battle of the Bulge",'65, comes to the aid of Ellen and sometimes you even wonder about David being on the up and up. As you view this picture you just about find yourself beginning to understand who is the real nutty person and all of a sudden, you begin to change your mind how the film will end. Great acting by Claudette Colbert and Robert Ryan who played an entirely different role than he usually portrays on the screen. I forgot to mention that Mel Ferrer, was married to a great film star, Audrey Hepburn. Great Classic film, with great Classic Actors !
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I realize you're excited and mixed up."
classicsoncall6 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The film is suspenseful enough, but when it's over, you begin to wonder how someone could have pulled off the ruse that had Ellen Ewing (Claudette Colbert) going temporarily insane. It would have taken her attorney Kent (Philip Ober) considerable resources in time and money to get so many people to identify Ellen as having been married four months earlier. Not to mention having someone commit murder to foil David McLean's (Robert Ryan) investigative effort to get to the bottom of the mystery. The closed room murder of Ellen's purported husband (Dave Barbour) also has to be questioned. What did the guy do to deserve getting killed to pull off a gaslight job like Gregory Kent intended? All those question marks pop up in the story after the fact of watching it, making the film somewhat questionable in terms of credibility. The one interesting casting decision here was that of Vivian Vance as the hotel housemaid. I think this is the only role I've ever seen her in where she's not Lucy's pal.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nutty, but not fun
rhoda-911 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Claudette Colbert and Robert Ryan are both too old for this screwy tale of a wedding interrupted by the claim that the bride is already married. She looks far too matronly-sensible to be driven insane, as she is, by a lot of suborned witnesses (or actors) who, apparently, wait at home for Colbert and Ryan to come calling on them (and who somehow manage to ensure that they will be in a certain hotel room rather than any of the others). He is a far too interesting actor to waste on a script that has him either rushing around after clues or consoling Claudette. And why is she a successful concert pianist? We expect that, or at least her sensitivity to sounds and music, to have something to do with the story, but it is just a pointless detail.

So terrible is the writing that we never find out who killed the murdered man or how! (He was alone in a room with Claudette when he was suddenly shot dead. Did the instigator of the plot pay him so much that he was willing to kill himself?) And, if you are still suspending disbelief, the movie cuts it loose in the final scene, in which Claudette, who has been incarcerated in a high-security mental institution, has managed to escape, to travel at least several miles back to her home, and to acquire a loaded gun!

The movie aims to start on a cute note by showing Ryan walking into the house where he is to be married and being refused admission because he does not have an invitation. He meekly goes out and tries to get in the back way, but a security guard blocks him there too. Why on earth doesn't he say he is the groom and prove it with some ID? The writers may have been pleased with their supposedly humorous idea, but it's not funny because it doesn't make any sense. Who except Caspar Milquetoast would behave that way? Certainly not Robert Ryan!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed