The Magnet (1950) Poster

(1950)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Magnetic Young James Fox
howardmorley2 May 2005
I bought this black & white video recently from a street vendor in St Albans market, Hertfordshire as part of a job lot of three Ealing comedies he was selling for £15.The others were "Whisky Galore" and "Passport to Pimlico".The other comments written below adequately deal with the basic plot, so I shall not elaborate further on that.What is interesting is to see the young William Fox play the juvenile lead small boy and whose later stage name was changed to James Fox (brother of Edward Fox) who later became well known in the film "The Servant" and "Performance".I was born in 1946 and this film was produced in 1950 so those scenes shown of early post war Britain have a reminiscence for me, when I remember those bomb sites, school dinners, food rationing which extended up to 1955, and an altogether more simple life.In those days children went "out to play" with their friends much more than todays TV/computer bound generation.

The jokes about the Labour Government and psychiatry give the film a distinctly middle class feel which Ealing Studios did not usually portray in their comedies but which was firmly entrenched in the mainstream British film industry at the time.It would be some time before genuine British working class actors exploded onto the screen.The dockside gang the small boy befriends appeared to be genuine working class and so those scenes were the highlight for me.Of course this film being produced in 1950, there has to be a morality tale in the script.Here the evils of cheating someone bring inevitable feelings of guilt until assuaged by an equal measure of generosity by the little boy to the aggrieved party, a handicapped boy of similar age.

I had never seen this Ealing comedy before so was delighted by the unexpected twists and turns in the plot.If you are a fan of gentle Ealing comedies, you may want to seek out this long forgotten (by the major TV networks) film and you will be entertained I feel sure.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Never dull
Leofwine_draca14 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
THE MAGNET is an unusual Ealing Studios comedy, seemingly aimed at children but with plenty of satirical elements for the adults. It very much reminded me of a proto Children's Film Foundation movie and, indeed, director Charles Frend would go on to shoot such pictures. James Fox plays a boy who comes into possession of a rare magnet on the beach, before finding himself engaging in various escapades with oddball people. Some elements are predictable - he thinks the police are out to get him when in fact they want to reward him - but there's some local character here from the Liverpudlian kids and some strong talent from cameoing stars like Harold Goodwin, Sam Kydd and Thora Hird. The film moves at a solid pace and, although it's not always successful, it's certainly never dull.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Magnet
ackstasis7 July 2011
After a characteristically stressful Physiology exam, decided to settle down with a movie, and what better than an offering from that beloved British institution, Ealing Studios? 'The Magnet (1950)' is one of the studio's lesser-known comedies, but ranks among their most charming efforts. The film is directed by Charles Frend, who also commandeered the excellent 'A Run for Your Money (1949)' – which succeeded despite being a veiled reworking of Capra's 'Mr Deeds Goes to Town (1936).' In 'The Magnet,' resourceful youth Johnny Brent (William Fox) cheats another boy out of an expensive magnet, before realising that this sin might eventually catch up to him. His attempts to dispose of the magnet are humorously futile, until he unloads the stolen object onto a kindly engineer, who interprets the gift as a noble gesture of Dickensian kindness. While little Johnny worries that his crime will be the death of him, his anxious parents (Stephen Murray and Kay Walsh) become concerned about his odd behaviour. The father, a trained psychiatrist, attempts to apply Jungian psychoanalysis to his son, and smugly reaches an entirely erroneous conclusion. This pleasant, easy-going film has all the hallmarks of an Ealing classic, with a particularly excellent and likable performance from its young star.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the Magnet - locations
melling-reid7 December 2004
A lot of the film was shot in New Brighton, and I have added this to the database as a location. The pier and ferry are no longer there but the Floral Pavilion and Wilkie's fairground (where they try to influence the pinball machine with the magnet) are. The swimming baths where the Miss New Brighton Competition takes place has gone as well. The bike shop was Longworths in Rowson St. You went and chose your bike and Mr Longworth told you to come and collect it next week so he had time to put the seat at the right height, check the brakes,oil it for you and check the tyres.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
James Fox's childhood hero....
tim-764-29185629 May 2012
Though The Magnet oozes middle-class wholesome 1950's family values, which can be seen these days as starchy and very straight-laced, this unusual offering from the Ealing Studios works well on many levels.

With his father a child psychologist, ten year old Johnny Brent (James Fox) has a very colourful imagination and loves inventing things and questioning everything. Johnny keeps getting under his mother's feet and so he is sent off out to play at the local beach to explore.

There, he trades rather dishonestly a magic (non-existent) watch for a giant magnet from a younger lad. The lad's nanny tells him off and so Johnny scarpers and starts imagining that he's in trouble with the police. Then, through completely contrived, but affectionately drawn events, the giant magnet comes up for auction and raises money for a hospital appeal. Johnny becomes hero.

Yes, this is whimsical nonsense and is rather Disney, before Disney did such things. But it's also the locations and snapshot of British life back then. It'll certainly appeal to the older generation and undoubtedly, to us boys of all ages, more, as it harks back to our own childhoods.

Generally, the acting is quite average and the direction from Ealing regular Charles Friend is about passable, though there are some fantasy sequences which are OK. However, the young James is a tonic, eschewing youthful zest and intrigue. He's completely natural and believable, little wonder that he went on to become the mega star he did.

The DVD transfer is OK but is a bit soft.

All in all, if you're expecting a comedy caper, as in the best Ealing tradition, you may be disappointed. But if you love your Ealing's and want to explore beyond the box-set classics, then this does quite nicely.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No Peace for the Wicked
richardchatten22 November 2020
Ealing often sent their crews to exotic locations and the claim in the opening credits that this fanciful whimsy was filmed at Ealing Studios - unusually without Alec Guinness - is ironically promptly contradicted by its's vivid rendering by cameraman Lionel Banes of the Merseyside locations around which a young 'William' Fox (as he was then called) is pursued; although Banes does also do an atmospheric job on the interiors.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Magnet - Refreshing Simplicity for Children
arthur_tafero12 November 2021
What a refreshing sight this film was to be enjoyed with my ten year old son, who by coincidence, was the same age as the protagonist in this film. I shuddered to think that Joseph might be able to act in a similar fashion on several occasions when I was not present, but I trust he will not. The film is funny, sharp-witted, and intelligent in its satire. The British have an understated way of delivering these kind of gems to the screen; whereas Hollywood always goes for the big production values and star power most of the time. Only the small independent filmmakers in America have a chance at making a film like this. See it and enjoy. And be careful buying your son or daughter a large magnet.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic Evocation of 1950 Wirral and Liverpool Childhood
ianchorley30 July 2001
This is a delightful film about a young boy growing up in a small riverside town,just across from Liverpool, in 1950.He experiences guilt after conning a younger boy out of a magnet and wrongly believing that this has lead to the other boy's death.Humour is provided by the boy's father a psychiatrist/psychologist who has a theory and an answer for everything, unfortunately these are usually wrong. Lots of nostalgia for those of us brought up at that time and place:New Brighton Pier and Lido;Mersey Ferry and Dockland Overhead Railway;Blitzed Area of Liverpool below Anglican Cathedral;Biscuits being delivered in large tin boxes.

Most memorable scene:Liverpool/Chinese boy(played by Geoffrey Yin)- When his mother shouts at him in Chinese from a window,he turns to his friends and says "Me mam sez I've gotta ave mi tea" ...in a strong Liverpool accent.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Hue and Cry" rides again!
JohnHowardReid16 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Production manager: L.C. Rudkin. Assistant director: Norman Priggen. Sound supervisor: Stephen Dalby. Sound recording: Len Hammond. Associate producer: Sidney Cole. Producer: Michael Balcon. Ealing Studios, London.

Copyright 23 May 1950 by Ealing Studios, Ltd. Presented by J. Arthur Rank. U.S. release through Universal-International: February 1951. New York opening at the Paris: 26 February 1951. U.K. release through General Film Distributors: October 1950. Australian release: 18 September 1952. 7,100 feet. 79 minutes. Cut by British Empire Films to 6,252 feet (including "General Exhibition" Censorship Certificate) in Australia, in order to release the picture as a 70- minute second feature.

SYNOPSIS: Johnny Brent, kept away from school by scarlet fever quarantine, is playing on the beach when he sees a smaller child with a large, impressive magnet. The other boy is unwilling to swap the magnet, but Johnny tricks him into surrendering it, and is then pursued from the beach by the child's irate nurse. Immediately he begins to feel guilty about his new possession; when he meets a man who has made a demonstration iron lung to raise funds for a real one for a hospital, he gladly gives up the unwanted magnet as a contribution to the fund.

The model-maker touched by this gesture, appeals to the public to emulate the generosity of the child who gave up his most precious possession, and the magnet is repeatedly auctioned, until the money for the iron lung is collected. The mayor, meanwhile, institutes a search for the boy. Johnny, by a couple of chance encounters, is led to believe that the other child is dead, having been infected by him, and that the police are hunting "the boy with the magnet" for murder.

COMMENT: An obvious attempt to repeat the success of "Hue and Cry" (1947), but it lacks the trenchant satire and the novelty of that film. True, the psychiatrist/father gets it in the neck, but this is much like flogging a dead horse. Though we like the coughing mayor, such other mild jokes as there are (the variations on the description of the magnet-giving boy), are muffed by inept direction.

Still, actual location filming is an asset and the players try hard to overcome the thinness of their material — it is basically a one- joke yarn that is rather slow in developing (and not a particularly amusing or credible joke anyway). Fortunately, young master Fox is an engaging youth.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Lovely evocative movie.
ronevickers11 June 2005
This film is very much of its time, and evokes a more gentler, long gone age. In many ways it is a typical "Ealing" film, although much location work takes place on Merseyside and, in particular New Brighton. I remember seeing this film on the children's' matinée in the 1950's - I enjoyed it then, and it has lost none of its charm now. It's main theme of "cheats not prospering" was a fine ideal then, and still applies today. The comparison of the affluent, comfortable, public school lifestyle of the main character to that of the boys he meets when he crosses the river to Liverpool, is very well drawn and brings an excellent sense of realism to the film. The location shots are first class, and lend an authenticity to the proceedings. The characters are, in the main, well portrayed and it's good to see another bravura performance from that most underrated of character actors, Meredith Edwards. All in all a lovely, timeless classic of a movie!
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This film is one of the main reasons why I have loved films all my life.
Eva Ionesco14 November 1999
Warning: Spoilers
The opening and closing sequences of this film have haunted me all my life with their beauty and power, and are one of the main reasons why I have loved films all my life. The long, complicated adventure in the main body of the film is a good, very worthwhile one, but does not have quite the same legendary status as the beginning and ending.

A young boy cons a younger boy out of a huge magnet, by swapping it for an "invisible clock" that says "tick, tick" in an unmistakably boyish voice when it is held up to the younger boy's ear. The ruse is successful, and the older boy immediately begins feeling guilty, and it is the dramatic portrayal of his guilt that sky-rockets the film to the legendary heights it deserves and the film still remains vivid in my memory even after almost fifty years!

Did the director know just how powerful a film he was making? I wonder! It's the boy's guilt that starts him on his odyssey; he runs away because he thinks he's in serious trouble, and at the end, the boy gets a chance to make it right again. (Here comes a spoiler, so you could stop reading now if you're going to see the film, though I can assure you that knowing the ending of this film will not diminish your enjoyment of it.)

*

At the end of the adventure the boy wins a medal for bravery, and it is the greatest prize that he could ever have, because it signifies a noble achievement, and shows him that he's not a bad boy after all. But he sees the younger boy again, and swaps it for the invisible clock!!! What a great, and thoroughly satisfying film! I saw the film again just recently, on late-night TV, and it has lost none of its power and impact. On a scale of 1 to 10, this film thoroughly deserves a 15!
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Two for Kay Walsh
jromanbaker13 July 2020
I must go against the grain of most reviewers here and despite the waste of the good actress Kay Walsh this film is in my opinion utterly boring. Some may consider the adventures of a boy and a magnet interesting but it left me cold. Incidents come and go but James Fox is annoying as an actor and his accent is totally out of character in Liverpool, and the rest of the actors suffer from the same Kensington/Chelsea complaint, or should I say Belgravia and Mayfair. This jars and the film is not strong enough to survive it. Set in London it would have been boringly believable but further North it just imposes London snobbery. Stephen Murray is a psychiatrist who uses jargon that is nonsense most of the time and the mention of Jung had me in fits of unwanted laughter. This is a long way from the great ' Passport to Pimlico ' but to be fair whoever reads this must make up their own minds. To put it in a nutshell this male brat is avoiding 'growing up ' and wearing long trousers by behaving ( in 1950's terms ) badly. Anyway that is what father psychiatrist says and while saying that looks as if he needs one of his own.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A delightful story of youth
tomgillespie20023 April 2012
This post-war British film from the great Ealing studios, is a charming tale of innocence lost, and particularly the idea of childhood guilt, brought on by a small incident and exacerbated by fear and misconstrued information. Johnny Brent (a young James Fox - billed as William Fox), a 10 year old wanderer, cons a younger boy into giving him his magnet. After feeling guilt (and particularly the fear of being caught out) he hands the powerful magnet to a charity organiser, feeling that he would be rid of his culpability. His imagination - coupled with his stricken conscience - takes over, as the boy with the magnet becomes of interest to the local authorities. He overhears and misinterprets some information he believes is connected with the boy he stole from. Fearing that he has caused the death of the boy, Johnny runs away.

The Magnet is full of genuine charm. It almost perfectly captures those moments of childhood where we believe we have done great wrong - a usual emotion of guilt, but particularly it is the acquisition of information in these situations that are fundamentally ingrained on our conscience. Johnny's father, Dr Brent (Stephen Murray), is a Jungian Psychoanalyst who attempts to interpret the unusual behaviour of his son, which leads to some interesting asides - this could possibly even be a criticism of this form of psychology, and it's intrinsic hypotheses that all strange behaviours are connected to the parents.

This is by no means the greatest of Ealing Studios output, but it is a delightful story of youth, with a good lead performance from Fox. It is always irresistible to watch old British films, and see an autonomous country that looks individual, before the signs and signifiers of American consumerism invaded and changed the landscape forever.

www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A delight
jfranktd9 January 2009
A friend of mine recently told me of this film and was amazed that I was able to buy it at Amazon for the amazing price of £5.65 including P&P,just took 2 days ! living now in New Brighton,where the film is set and mostly filmed,and being at an age the be able to remember the 50's well,I was actually born the year this film was made,but it was a total delight to watch,seeing the overhead railway again,the beach,the Perch rock,the indoor fairground,I spent half my youth in there,and spotting all the locations around was wonderful,every person over 50 living on the Wirral should see this little film,not many real "scouse" accents though !...did anybody spot the businessman on the Overhead railway...surely that was Arthur Lowe but not mentioned in the credits,wonderful wonderful film.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Old film, but memorable to a young child
khaskins5211 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This film was made the year that I was born. I remember watching it when I was very young; probably around age 6. I mostly remember it because it scared me. There is a young boy in the film who is injured (or sick) and ends up in an "iron lung" machine because he needs help breathing. I'd never seen such a machine, and it was disturbing to me. It was in the early 1950's, and there was a polio epidemic happening in real life.(People with polio often needed these machines to breathe.) I don't remember much else about the film, so this isn't a very good, or useful, "review". I'd simply remembered that it existed, and was amazed to find something about it on this site.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Thou shalt not steal.
mark.waltz10 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It wasn't actually stepped, but a vicious prank gone bad that left young James Fox films with a guilty conscience and paranoid over every conversation that he hears. He has traded in a magnet for an alleged invisible watch, and gives it away to clear his conscience yet can't escape what he did. They are looking for him to give it back, thinking he's a poor waif, and he ends up on the run across the river in Liverpool, protected by a bunch of tough street kids, while his parents, Stephen Murray and Kay Walsh, search for him. It is very amusing having Fox listen to adults having conversations that have nothing to do with him and getting more guilt-ridden with every adult boys he hears.

Young James Fox, who would go on to great acclaim as an adult actor, is fabulous here, and it's amusing to see the young version the star who would grow up to teach Julie Andrews "The Tapioca" in "Thoroughly Modern Millie". The location footage is fascinating, truly gritty, and showing viewers locations they'll probably never see. The street gang is very funny, their tough talk at first bullying him then helping him out when they find out that he's on the run from the police, so he thinks. Papa Murray, who is a psychiatrist, is hysterical, making assumptions about Fox that aren't anywhere near true. So much to like about this movie, an Ealing comedy that deserves much more classic status and its achievement simply because of the variety of messages that it provides.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnificent.
sibisi738 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
A delightful comedy of mistaken identity, misinformation, and chinese whispers. Less farcical than many of Ealing Studios most famous productions, 'The Magnet' is, nevertheless, well worth watching for it's genuine characters and it's insightful take on postwar Britain.

The young boy at the centre of the chaos is guilt-ridden after swindling another young boy into handing over his prized magnet in exchange for an invisible watch. The boy eventually becomes the hero of the film, but is unaware of the fact, instead believing himself to be responsible for the breaking the other boy's heart and causing his untimely death. He goes on the run, and while the adults search for their hero, he does everything to escape them. But the adults are just as confused as the children, falling foul of their own misconstrued ideas and overheard conversations. One of the funniest scenes has Johnny's parents psychoanalysing the child in order to find out his problem, and getting the completely wrong end of the stick. There are allusions to the need for a community, and a common voice throughout. Johnny joins a bunch of rough kids by the docks who accept him and protect him without question despite their obvious differences, and Johnny himself is redeemed when he hands his civic medal back to the child he originally conned, thus overriding his guilt. Maybe a cheat here and there is OK, if the end justifies the means.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What an absolute gem of film!
Janet161220 October 2022
A lovely film giving us all a taste of nostalgia. One reviewer mentions the London accents being wrong for a Liverpool setting. It's clear he doesn't know Liverpool, also the parents are professionals and Johnny speaks as his parents do - plus he attends boarding school, not a local one. I worked with many colleagues in Hackney (east London) where they was born bred and worked - most had a beautiful speaking voices and were well spoken.

Another reviewer complains that there are no working class actors in it -well the story is about a boy whose parents are professional psychologists and are middle class. I'm sure why they weren't aware of that - if you want working class, there are many supporting cast of working class origins. Even James Robertson J plays a tramp. Or watch some 'kitchen sink' dramas!

The wonderful Johnny is played by James Fox (although the name in the credits is William). His and his brother Edwards's lovely features are now seen though James' son, and Edwards' daughter Emilia - such a strong family resemblance and all great actors.

The lovely 1950s black and white film is a joy to watch. The beautiful house and neighbourhood as well as the seaside and beach senes. Such beautiful accents too.

I love the scene when Johnny (after his many adventures) has supper in bed as he tells mum he's not feeling too well. It's brought up on a tray, there he is with his poached egg on toast and shaking sat and pepper on it! I don't recall doing this a as child.

Another lovely and nostalgic scene is when Johnny is old enough to have long trousers - dad sees them thrown on the floor and nicely reprimands Johnny and reminds him he's now of an age to look after his clothes. 'Sorry dad' says Johnny.

Such a lovely film which I'll be watching again in the near future. Some odd accents - and not all Liverpudlian (where the film is set).

Full circle at the end - great story and one I would highly recommmend.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Liverpool before the Beatles and Yosser
TwittingOnTrender31 July 2019
A wonderful, poignant and heartwarming movie. As a fan of Hue and Cry, I was expecting something similar, which it is, but even better. The star in this case (a very young William/James Fox) is a lonely schoolboy, recovering from scarlet fever and wandering the streets of what is now Merseyside, as well as the streets of his imagination, bowling an imaginary cricket bowl as he goes. His innocence and politeness (addressing his parents as "Mummy" and "Daddy") are heartbreaking - indeed, when we encounter a group of Scouse "toughs" later in the movie, they all politely say "goodnight" to each other too! Scouse accents are notable by their absence, but post-war Liverpool (and New Brighton, across the Mersey) provides a beautiful setting. Some of the satire (on the profession of psychology, and in the way a false scenario causes the cash for the iron lung to be raised) is lacking in subtlety, but there are a couple of surreal scenes (young Johnny depicted as various types of urchin as the eccentric inventor parlays the story of the generous child into a fairy tale) which must have been quite innovative in 1950. At an hour and a quarter, it's frustratingly short, and definitely left me wanting more.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnetic Narrative
tedg15 October 2007
English films from right after the war — particularly those from Ealing or Archers — are a pretty interesting pocket to mine. Its a strange mix of experiments of all types. There's no predictability, no massive copying. Its as if everything is reset in a cultural medium and tastes need to be rediscovered or even reinvented.

This story as two elements. One is a story about a boy in a boy's clever world of invention and exploration. That's the bits you are meant to see. The other is overtly symbolic: his father is a clinical psychologist who has a need to "explain things." The story is about the hunger of certain stories, one would almost say the attraction or magnetism of stories, and that can be the only reason why the possession that triggers the story-story is a magnet.

What happens here is an ordinary episode triggers several fantastic stories, all of them with lives of their own as they adapt to live and propagate. There's extreme attention to symbols as if it were written by the psychologist: iron lungs, remote alarms, "secret" sign language, an invisible watch.

The story itself has minor charms. Its the loading of the overt symbols that is the fun part, especially since the writer seems to be poking fun at the notion of symbols the whole time.

Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed