Shoot First (1953) Poster

(1953)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
ROUGH SHOOT (Robert Parrish, 1953) ***
Bunuel19767 February 2011
Like CIRCLE OF DANGER (1951; see my review elsewhere), this is a British thriller with a lightweight American lead, in this case Joel McCrea; also like that earlier Jacques Tourneur film, this has a decidedly Hitchcockian flavor to it (down to a Bernard Herrmann-esque score, though he would only team up with The Master three years later!) and is, in effect, a livelier example of its kind. Interestingly, both Ray Milland (star of DANGER) and McCrea would work for Hitchcock on DIAL 'M' FOR MURDER (1954) and FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT (1940) respectively. The film under review is based on a Geoffrey Household novel and, like Fritz Lang's similarly-sourced MAN HUNT (1941), it centers around a hunting aficionado whose favorite pastime lands him in hot water; the screen adaptation was itself penned by celebrated crime novelist Eric Ambler.

Abetting McCrea in his struggle are understanding wife Evelyn Keyes (she had already portrayed her definitive noir role in 1951 courtesy of Joseph Losey's THE PROWLER), Polish military 'mental case' Herbert Lom (unusually a good guy despite his obvious ambivalence) and sympathetic British Intelligence man Roland Culver. Their antagonists, then, are first-rate marksman Marius Goring (from the afore-mentioned CIRCLE OF DANGER but in a less showy role), sinister chauffeur Karel Stepanek and mysterious Austrian female Patricia Laffan (equally enigmatic off-screen, since the promise she showed in the definitive 1951 version of QUO VADIS was never delivered upon!); curiously enough, her alcoholic and uncommitted (to the cause) husband here – played by Frank Lawton (from 1935's David COPPERFIELD) – basically disappears halfway through the proceedings!

The exciting action takes us from McCrea's shooting grounds (doubling as a night-time airfield for the villains' purposes) through an impersonation game to a perilous train journey to a notable climax at London's world-renowned "Madame Tussaud's" wax museum. Here, Goring startlingly blows himself up to safeguard the all-important documents that a typically meek defecting scientist had brought over with him from the other side. For the record, this was released in the U.S. as SHOOT FIRST, which is the name attached to the TCM-sourced copy I watched. One final thing: former actor and Oscar-winning editor Robert Parrish had graduated to the director's chair shortly before this, in 1951 – with two more noirs which I should be watching presently, namely CRY DANGER and THE MOB.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A fine 30's school-of-Hitchcock espionage thriller, but made in the 1950s.
PaulusLoZebra21 August 2023
Colin McGuigan gets this film exactly right: it's very Hitchcockian, and that is a compliment, but a throwback to Hitch in the 1930s, 10-20 years befoer this one was made in 1953. It's a very well made film, with a good story line and good actors, plus nice on-location shooting, but it looks and feels like it was made in the mid-late 1930s. If you just accept that, you will enjoy this tale of international intrigue. Joel McCrea gives a good, solid and believable performance to anchor the entire film; the villains are also believeably villainous, but not cartoonish; and Herbert Lom brightens up the proceedings whenever he is on screen.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
By coincidence, two bullets.
mark.waltz19 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The audience knows that, but Joel McCrea, walking on his own property, does not. He sees what he believes to be a poacher and before he can even find out who the person is, shoots them with a rifle filled with buckshot, which would only bring them down but not kill them. At the same time, someone is aiming a rifle at the same person, and that's the bullet that eventually kills him. Desperate to avoid being prosecuted for murder, McCrea takes advantage of the fact that while carrying the body, he tripped over a large root and the body flew over a cliff.

Pretty soon he's visited by a rather bizarre Polish official (Herbert Lom) who bums ride with him and wife Evelyn Keyes who has all sorts of questions for him. But it turns out that Lom lives in a local mental hospital, and they aren't quite sure if he's a patient or not. Several other weird characters pop up to increase the intrigue, among them and ever so efficient British official played by Roland Culver.

Spy dramas can often be messy, and while this one has its moments, for the most part it's pretty clear cut. The British countryside is quite beautiful, and then they end up in London where there are confrontations at Victoria Station and inside the Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum where everything comes together. Pretty intriguing but I found it a little dull at times, and some of Keyes' line readings were a little bizarre. But as a light film noir spy drama, it has its share of interesting characters and is a decent thriller even if I wasn't entirely enthused by it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A not so bad espionage yarn.
searchanddestroy-18 March 2009
A Hitchcock like espionage movie shot by the American director Robert Parrish in England, in the early 50's. We had already seen this kind of try with Jacques Tourneur's CIRCLE OF DANGER, except that this latest film was not an espionage one.

It's surprising to see Joel Mc Crea in a non western feature. And it's a pretty good success. As far as I remember, and perhaps I am wrong because I did not see it since twenty years, the Tourneur's movie included a hunting party too, but perhaps not at the beginning, like this one.

We easily feel the British influence in this programmer, and not only through the actors. But the general atmosphere sounds nevertheless mainly from the USA.

A fairly good caper film.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Act Three Is Worth The Wait
LeonLouisRicci1 October 2013
Espionage Thriller that really takes awhile to take off, as the slow moving startup is meant to propel Joel McCrea into a Spy Ring and Set Up a Situation that may remind the Viewer of Hitchcock.

But this is rather awkward at first and never attains much Mystery or Suspense until things leave the Countryside. Herbert Lom's Performance borders on Broad Comedy and holds things back somewhat.

There is enough here to be an Entertaining Piece of Cold War Propaganda, but never really kicks into High Gear until the Final Act. Up to that point things are really Talky and Stodgy, but it does manage to display some Atmospheric Tension during the Chase through a Wax Museum and in the Bowels of a Cityscape.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Is it just me, or does a lot of this not make much sense?!
planktonrules25 June 2017
"Shoot First" is a Cold War suspense film that kept having ask "why did he do that?" as much of the behavior of the leading character, Lt. Colonel Taine (Joel McCrea) made little sense.

The story is set in England. American Lt. Colonel Taine and his wife live there and rent some land where the Colonel likes to hunt. One day, he sees someone on the land and he thinks it's a poacher...so he decides to put some birdshot into the guy and teach him a lesson. However, just as Taine fires, so does a hidden enemy agent...but this shot is from a rifle and it kills the supposed poacher. But Taine thinks he did it and hides the body. Now don't you think in doing this he would have seen a rifle shot?? And, that the shot was on the OTHER side of the man's body?? Well, apparently this Colonel knows little about guns and he just hopes no one finds him.

In the meantime, enemy agents are lurking everywhere around the property. So what do the forces of NATO do? They send one man (Herbert Lom) to look into it. And, when they find spies, instead of calling in troops, he and Taine get caught up in trying to capture them!! Considering the future of the free world hangs in the balance, this does seem like a stupid plan!

As you might have guessed, I did not love this film. In addition to not making much sense, the film also was awfully dull...which is odd for an espionage film.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hollywood has been clueless about guns for a long time
dstaats-1908819 July 2023
The opening premise of this 1953 movie is that a U. S. Army lieutenant colonel shoots a man with a load of buckshot and then is surprised when the man falls over dead. Buckshot is called buckshot because it is intended to kill a buck. It will certainly kill a man. The idea of shooting a man with a load of buckshot to scare him off your property is beyond stupid, it is criminal. And the idea that an Army colonel, who presumably has recently served in WW II, would do such a thing is also beyond stupid. You NEVER point and fire a firearm at a person unless you intend to kill that person.

I like Joel McCrae as an actor, but he can't save this script; and the fact that he participated in such stupidity lowers him a notch. Too bad.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
How to hunt hares... and catch spies in stead !
VanheesBenoit28 December 2009
US Col. Robert Tanie lives with his wife in a cottage in rural England. While hunting on hares, he stumbles on someone he suspects being a poacher or a smuggler. Hoping to scare off the trespasser, he takes a shot at him, and sees the man fall down. Having used non lethal munition, he's very surprised to discover the man's actually dead. What he doesn't know is that the actual killer is a sniper, belonging to a spy ring. Later, he meets Sandorski, a Polish officer (you could describe him as something between Tarfu –see Sabotage agent- and Hercules Poirot). This Sandorski is working together with some British cloak and dagger people, that are keeping a close eye on some suspicious characters, who are also roaming around on the hunting grounds. Sandorski has discovered the presence of strong lights, that are intended to help a plane land in the darkness on these remote surroundings. It soon turns out some shady characters are expecting a mysterious plane with a passenger that clearly doesn't want to use more common ways to travel to the UK. Tanie and the Polish officer manage to change the position of landing lights, and "kidnap" the passenger. It turns out to be a scientist from the Eastern bloc, who wants to meet a communist spy in London.

The novel was by Geoffrey Household, the screenplay by nobody less than Eric Ambler. The action is more important than the psychology of the characters or the dialogs. The movie starts at a somewhat slow pace, but gradually, things are becoming more and more interesting, building up toward a nice climax in Madame Tussaud's. The movie is at times somewhat unnecessarily complex: the presence of a Polish officer with a cavalry sword (!) doesn't add much strength to the storyline. Also, it would have made more sense if Col. Tanie was enjoying retirement with his beautiful wife on the English countryside, so I was surprised to see him use a (US ?) uniform at times, which suggested he was not. And why would spies meet in Madame Tussaud's in stead of in a safe house ?

Still, it's certainly a nice little movie: although no A-stuff, certainly a better than average B-movie. Joel McCrea is alright as the not particularly bright Colonel, and Evelyn Keyes is well cast as his helpful but also curious and somewhat impatient wife. I'd rate it 7.5 to 8/10 However, if you want to see a much better UK spy movie from the same period, try to find High Treason.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
originally "Rough Shoot" Meh
RemiFasolati-881-77188229 December 2013
"SHOOT FIRST" (1953) Joel Macrae - I like Joel Macrae but this one just left me quite bored. The cable guide gives it 3 stars, I'd give it one star.

Herbert Lom plays pivotal character, Sandorski.

How can such an exciting storyline be treated so shabbily? Even as I was watching it I thought it was as if they purposely toned-down the dynamic impact (typically British under-statement) in order to convey stark distance and a sort of clinical detachment.

Macrae plays an American Army officer in England who gets involved with some local Nazi spies. But that sounds way more exciting than the movie actually is.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hitchcockian pretensions
bkoganbing27 September 2013
Shoot First has the distinction of being the only non-western that Joel McCrea appeared in from 1946 until the end of his career. It was a bad mistake, worse than that when you consider the source is an Eric Ambler novel which usually translate well to the screen you have to scratch your head and wonder.

McCrea plays an army colonel stationed in the United Kingdom with wife Evelyn Keyes and they have a small country place where McCrea does occasional rabbit and grouse shooting. He shoots with a light load of buckshot some foreign speaking gentleman he catches on his land mistakes for a poacher. Later on he returns and finds him dead and hides the body.

After that McCrea and Keyes get involved in a web of spies and intrigue as McCrea realizes he's in a jackpot facing a possible murder charge.

This is where I have real problems with a film that has Hitchcockian pretensions. This is not Cary Grant an advertising man caught up with spies, this is a professional soldier. No way in the world could you make it believable that McCrea would act like this in his situation. The plot premise is just ridiculous.

One thing this British production has going for it is Patricia Laffan one of the sexiest women ever in British cinema. American audiences will know her best for playing Poppaea in Quo Vadis. She plays a foreign wife of a dissolute Englishman Frank Lawton who's involved with foreign agents. She's always a treat as is Herbert Lom as an exiled Polish count whom were never quite sure about.

But they are not enough to save this one.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Routine Cold War Thriller
zardoz-135 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Perennial western star Joel McCrea swapped his nineteenth cowboy togs for a twentieth century army uniform in director Robert Parrish's "Shoot First," a routine Cold War era espionage outing, co-starring Herbert Lom, Evelyn Keyes, and Roland Culver. McCrea is cast as retired U. S. Army Colonel Bob Taine. His wife (Evelyn Keys) and he reside in Dorset, England, where has also rented a tract of land with hunting privileges. One day, Taine spots a poacher on his property and gives the fellow a load of buckshot. Imagine Taine's surprise when he discovers the man he shot is in fact dead. In his alarm, he calls for an ambulance, but the man dies before help can arrive, so our protagonist buries him in the woods. Mind you, concealing the corpse of the man he shot isn't exactly what any law-abiding citizen would do, but Taine doesn't want to go to prison for an accidental shooting. No sooner has he done this than Scotland Yard enters the picture. Later, a natty gentleman in a suit and tie from British Intelligence, Randall (Roland Culver of "Thunderball"), visits Taine, but the colonel doesn't mention having shot anybody. Afterward, things get a little convoluted in Eric Ambler's screenplay based on Geoffrey Household's novel "Rough Shoot." Mind you, Taine couldn't have slain the poacher, but our protagonist isn't thinking rationally when he stashes the body in the brush. Actually, as it turns out, this fellow, who responsible for killing the man is a villainous soul named Hiart (Marius Goring) and he did it with a long-range rifle. The chief weakness in Ambler's screenplay is our firm suspicions that something is amiss because Joel McCrea doesn't go about killing people, premediated or otherwise. Nevertheless, Taine harbors some guilt. Eventually, he lets his wife in on his dark secret. Meantime, Randal brings in an eccentric gentleman, Sandorski (Herbert Lom of "The Pink Panther"), a retired Polish Army Colonel. We learn the dead man name was Reimann, and he was a member of Soviet spy network who was trying to defect. By this time, the police are closing in on Taine, but Randall orders them to stand down because Sandorski is going to team up Taine. Anybody who believes Taine could have killed Reimann with a load of buckshot will probably be chewing their nails as this 88-minute, United Artists, black and white thriller ramps up its suspense. Ultimately, Taine and Sandorski find out that the Soviets plan to used Taine's field to land a plane carrying another spy. "Shoot First" qualifies as a half-baked spy thriller that wraps up with a careening car chase.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Almost like Hitchcock
Mbakkel224 June 2017
This spy film has all the ingredients that I require: A likable male lead (Joel McCrea), a gorgeous female lead (Diana Decker) and a great supporting cast, including Marius Goring, Herbert Lom and Roland Culver. It has suspense, humour and a good script.

The end of the film takes place at Madame Tussaud's wax cabinet. Hitchcock used several famous landmarks in his thrillers, but I am uncertain if he could turn the script into a so entertaining film like director Robert Parrish did.

Although this film is shot in black and white and contains neither bikini-clad women nor funny gadgets, I think this film is better than most James Bond films.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
McCrea plays most dangerous spy game, explosive ending
adrianovasconcelos23 February 2024
I knew zero about Director Robert Parrish until recently, but then I saw IN THE FRENCH STYLE and SADDLE THE WIND, two very different films, and I liked his style and versatility.

I might add that I am quite impressed by ROUGH SHOOT (aka SHOOT FIRST! In the US) and its Hitchcockian touches, including the musical score by Hans May which vaguely pre-announces Bernard Herrmann.

I do like watching Joel McCrea. Never a great actor, somehow he reminds me of William Powell's pleasant presence on screen. Even in unremarkable roles, he is a joy to watch, always calm and with a reassuring smile. The exquisitely beautiful Evelyn Keyes lights up the screen, Laurence Naismith rates very effective as the MI5 spy master, Herbert Lom plays a friendly Polish colonel with great savvy and cunning, Marius Goring and his sidekick driver are the heavies, and the twisty and clever screenplay by Eric Ambler takes you through an eventful train ride to an explosive finale at Madame Tussaud's, London.

Can you ask for better? 8/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Getting stuck and causing havoc in a hornet's nest.
clanciai2 December 2023
Eric Ambler's scripts more often than not annoyed me by being muddled and artificial. This is no exception, and the first part of the film makes you squirm in uneasy impatience, but then things turn interesting as the plot unfolds. Hitchcock was very careful about always letting the audience know exactly what was happening, that major principle is missing here like in so many Hitchcock-inspired films. Joel McRea is generally reliable, but the real actor here is Herbert Lom as the Polish commandant in the service of MI5, he is wonderful in every scene and lifts the film out of the ditch. The intrigue is interesting, Joel McRea attempts to shoot a hare and hits a man with a buckshot, and the man is dead. No one thinks of the idea that the man could have been shot by someone else at the same time, two shots and two hits from a long distance, which immediately throws the film out of credible realism. There are Germans involved interested in atomic secrets, their leader Marius Goring always haughty and unsympathetic, but Roland Culver as the MI5 man also makes a good impression. Evelyn Keyes is the enjoyable character of the film, and Herbert Lom gives her the proper treatment. There is a great finale which saves the film, but the major asset is actually a great score by Hans May, which gives the right espionage atmosphere to the film, although the real thing is missing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed