Jungle Heat (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
"It's like digging a hole in water. It can't be done."
hwg1957-102-26570421 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The story about a Japanese fifth column on a Hawaiian island before the attack on Pearl Harbour is quite interesting but is handled in an unexciting way. It would have been better movie with a stronger cast but it gets Lex Barker who is handsome but wooden and Mari Blanchard who is given an unrewarding role as the routine romantic interest. The best character was James Westerfield as the rotund Harvey Mathews, ever laughing while knocking back bottles of tonic water. From his first appearance he is obviously the chief villain. The music score by Les Baxter is not one of his best.

In it's favour the film has lots of outdoor scenes filmed at attractive locations.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not so bad after all
searchanddestroy-15 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A Bel Air production, it's not so usual to catch on a TV broadcast. So, don't let it go. At the beginning and during all the first third of the feature, I wondered if it was worth seeing it. I was a little bored. Lots of talking among natives, jungle, Lex Barker and Mari Blanchard with Glenn Langam in between, hot passion in prospect in the jungle. Guess what I mean...

But the interest appears in the middle of this story about plot,spies and Japanese fifth column in a little island just before December the 7th.

Everyone knows what that means...

Speaking about it, the movie ends with an interesting image.

Not so bad, after all.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Right before Pearl Harbor--and that's the best part of a weak movie
secondtake28 November 2013
Jungle Heat (1957)

I have a thing for old B-movies. It's partly for the rawness, and the photography, and maybe discovering some actors in early (or late) performances. "Jungle Heat" is a dud. The writing and most of the acting is so bad it made me cringe. And I'm a sympathetic audience.

So skip that, skip the rest of this review, and give me a thumbs up for helping your day. (smiley face)

What recommends this at all? For one thing, the setting is interesting, and it's filmed where it's set: Kauai, Hawaii. (At least the crew and cast were happy. I've been there and it's about the most amazing place I've been.) The plot is meant to be hyper-dramatic, filled with dread as we know Pearl Harbor is looming. Yes, it's set right before December, 1941, and the story implies that Japanese enemies were at work in the backwaters of Hawaii. The locals, though portrayed as bimbos or selfish fools (mostly) eventually catch on to what's happening and put an awkward end to it.

But my goodness, what bad production values. The director (who I met once, in Woodstock where he had a place), is famous for being the "third" screenwriter (after the famous Epstein brothers) on Casablanca (which does have the most stunning script). But he never quite rose to his apparent promise. He ended up best as a producer, but unlike the great producers (name any of the keystones of the studio system era), he itched to be "more" than a producer.

What else? Ah, nothing. My review are too long anyway. Move on.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Outdated flag waver
bkoganbing3 August 2014
The interesting subject of racism in Hawaii is badly treated in this film Jungle Heat. The setting is Hawaii right before the attack on Pearl Harbor. Glenn Langan has been sent for to manage a new plantation after the old overseer was murdered and he's got some definite ideas about how to manage the plantation. These natives are just lazy by nature and they need a good swift kick in the posterior region to get them to work.

All this is playing right into the hands of the avuncular James Westerfield who plays another plantation owner but is in league with the Japanese who want the native Hawaiians against the Americans. Dr. Lex Barker tries to tell Langan this is all a Japanese plot, but he's too thick to believe him. Besides Langan's wife Mari Blanchard is providing all the jungle heat that the male population is in.

This film is about 15 years too late. It might have been acceptable propaganda fare in 1942, but even the most xenophobic Americans weren't going to buy this in 1957. But Mari Blanchard sure is nice to look at.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ouch!
planktonrules13 November 2021
When it was made, "Jungle Heat" was likely seen as a very progressive movie in regard to race. However, it sure gives a very confusing message in the process...one that clearly will infuriate most viewers.

The story begins with some sabotage on a plantation in pre-war Hawaii. It seems there have been a lot of incidents like it and a supposed expert, Roger McRae (Glenn Langan), has been brought in to help. Unfortunately, the guy is a total wiener...a racist and hate-filled wiener. He views all Asians as subhuman and his ill-informed opinion is that he needs to put the fear of God into the natives by being brutal. Nice guy, huh?

On the other hand, there is the 'enlightened' Dr. Ransom (Lex Barker), who feels that these acts of sabotage aren't because local workers were lazy or evil but that they were being orchestrated by the Japanese. As this is set just before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the answer is obvious to the viewer.

Looking at this film now, Ransom's opinion, while more enlightened, also would seem to condone and even possibly endorse internment camps for the Japanese-Americans.

All in all, while it's a semi-enjoyable film, it's also filled with a lot of nasty and hateful messages. I am NOT the biggest politically correct guy...but I found the attitudes in the film a bit shocking. For example, when McRae wildly shoots into a cabin when told NOT to because there's an innocent woman inside, he does anyway...killing the woman. Yet, inexplicably, he's not arrested or punished in any way.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty Bland All Around
Michael_Elliott30 June 2012
Jungle Heat (1957)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

New plantation owners show up in pre-WWII Hawaii to take over their land but they soon realize that Dr. Jim Ransom (Lex Barker) is investigating possible Japanese communist working in the area. If you're looking for a boring, dull, lifeless and bad dialogue driven film then this here is a must see. If you're half-way human and expect thrillers to be thrilling then it's best that you stay away from this "C" movie from Bel-Air. It should be noted that the studio made this film at the same time as their equally bad VOODOO ISLAND with Boris Karloff. Both films contain a low-budget, a notable star and that's just about it. It's clear the studio wasn't able to do too much with their budget and this is probably why you see so little going on here. There's really no action scenes up until the end and once we get to them by that times you're so bored that it doesn't matter what happens. Another major problem is that the three lead characters are all rather bland and not for a second do you care about them. I think it was interesting that they were trying to do something pre-Pearl Harbor but the end result is just a failure. When you've got poor writing, no story and a lack of any real characters it's very hard to overcome this and JUNGLE HEAT ends up feeling twice as long as its 75-minute running time. Barker actually isn't too bad in his part and Mari Blanchard and James Westerfield are also fairly good. Still, there's just not enough going on with this picture to make it worth watching unless you're wanting to be a judge and see whether this or VOODOO ISLAND is worse.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed