29 reviews
What often threatens to turn into a soppy and soft-headed drama about misunderstood middle-class youth ends up a surprisingly shaded and subdued movie by John Frankenheimer (his first, though he had started in television, directing among other things an earlier version of this script).
We are still in those semi-mythic 50s when teenagers drove jalopies and jeans were still dungarees. James MacArthur (adoptive son of playwright Charles and actress Helen Hayes, and later to enter pop culture as Hawaii 5-0's Danno) gets involved in a minor incident in a movie theater which escalates to his throwing a punch at the manager (Whit Bissell) and being booked down at the police station. His dad (James Daly), a big-shot movie producer gets the call, doesn't listen to his son's version of the story, and pulls strings to get him off.
But MacArthur keeps carrying a chip on his shoulder, which even his sympathetic mom (Kim Hunter) can't knock off. Things worsen in the Coldwater Canyon homestead until MacArthur, trying to vindicate himself, stages a reprise of the original incident....
The movie doesn't quite avoid the attitudes and cliches of its time, but presents them with considerable nuance: Every character gets an honorable hearing; every point of view has its merits (and reactions to the movie will depend on what viewers bring to it). There are flaws (the word `crummy,' a standard rebellious euphemism of the era, is used about 30 times too often) but they're outweighed by strengths. The movie benefits from a strong cast (most notable among them the excellent character actor James Gregory, as a police detective) and a resolutely non-exploitative way of telling its story. From a vantage point in the new millennium, the hot water MacArthur finds himself in may seem a little tepid, but The Young Stranger remains honest and honorable.
We are still in those semi-mythic 50s when teenagers drove jalopies and jeans were still dungarees. James MacArthur (adoptive son of playwright Charles and actress Helen Hayes, and later to enter pop culture as Hawaii 5-0's Danno) gets involved in a minor incident in a movie theater which escalates to his throwing a punch at the manager (Whit Bissell) and being booked down at the police station. His dad (James Daly), a big-shot movie producer gets the call, doesn't listen to his son's version of the story, and pulls strings to get him off.
But MacArthur keeps carrying a chip on his shoulder, which even his sympathetic mom (Kim Hunter) can't knock off. Things worsen in the Coldwater Canyon homestead until MacArthur, trying to vindicate himself, stages a reprise of the original incident....
The movie doesn't quite avoid the attitudes and cliches of its time, but presents them with considerable nuance: Every character gets an honorable hearing; every point of view has its merits (and reactions to the movie will depend on what viewers bring to it). There are flaws (the word `crummy,' a standard rebellious euphemism of the era, is used about 30 times too often) but they're outweighed by strengths. The movie benefits from a strong cast (most notable among them the excellent character actor James Gregory, as a police detective) and a resolutely non-exploitative way of telling its story. From a vantage point in the new millennium, the hot water MacArthur finds himself in may seem a little tepid, but The Young Stranger remains honest and honorable.
Clean-cut but wisecracking teenage boy in Beverly Hills causes a minor stir in a movie theater, scuffles with a too-strict staff and ends up punching the manager in the face! Somewhat mechanical yet heartfelt melodrama, a thinly-disguised plea for the misunderstood teen, does manage to touch on some interesting child-parent issues. Filmed in just 25 days by debuting director John Frankenheimer (who practically disowned the thing later on), it's an occasionally effective second-feature written by Robert Dozier, who adapted his own TV play "Deal a Blow". James MacArthur is green but compelling in the lead, James Daly and Kim Hunter excellent as his parents. Relatively minor, but the straightforward handling and still-relatable angst result in several fine sequences and a moving finale. **1/2 from ****
- moonspinner55
- Apr 24, 2003
- Permalink
The world is going to miss John Frankenheimer. This was his first feature film and it was four years before he directed his second, but don't let that dissuade you from seeking it out. Frankenheimer's direction is assured, and he gets some compelling performances out of his cast.
Someone else has already pointed them out, but I also want to talk up James Gregory and Whit Bissell in two key supporting roles. Both would work for Frankenheimer again -- Gregory most notably as the bumbling senator in "The Manchurian Candidate" -- and they do good work for him here.
If the whole thing seems too simple in the end, that's merely because Frankenheimer and writer Robert Dozier chose to tell a simple story, and they do it well. Keep a lookout for it -- Turner Classic Movies just might show it again.
Someone else has already pointed them out, but I also want to talk up James Gregory and Whit Bissell in two key supporting roles. Both would work for Frankenheimer again -- Gregory most notably as the bumbling senator in "The Manchurian Candidate" -- and they do good work for him here.
If the whole thing seems too simple in the end, that's merely because Frankenheimer and writer Robert Dozier chose to tell a simple story, and they do it well. Keep a lookout for it -- Turner Classic Movies just might show it again.
- craigjclark
- Jul 11, 2002
- Permalink
From the very beginning this movie is a classic of the teens-in-trouble genre - or of any genre. In many respects it is better than "Rebel Without a Cause" with its stunning black and white cinematography, far less pretentious and overwrought plot, and scrupulous avoidance of anything smacking of exploitation. Performances are absolutely breathtaking, even those of secondary characters. The music is just perfect, a dream. Stylistically this is as good as it gets. The plot matches the subdued, sensitive style. But there is a fly in the ointment. The movie overplays its cards, pleading for so much compassion for a young man who doesn't quite merit it, that one tends to side with the theater manager whom he assaulted. The boy's feelings are so tender, that even when he escapes punishment he wants his victim and parents and society in general to admit that he wouldn't have deserved it, had he been so unlucky as to have gotten it. That is going too far. That is emotional blackmail. It's a nasty, bullying streak that the writer feeds and rewards. The implication seems to be that all the sensitive youth are concentrated in the upper strata of society. The wealthier the more "sensitive" kids are. That's occasion for mirth. Poor youngsters are as entitled to say "we are also sensitive", we are also going through phases, and we also need understanding and tender loving care.
- CitizenCaine
- Jun 29, 2004
- Permalink
A teenage James MacArthur stars in this film dealing with the age old theme of listen to your children as well as try to believe them.
From an affluent Beverly Hill home, MacArthur finds himself being harassed in a movie theater after a patron complained about his putting his legs on a chair. The problem is that there were plenty of people saw the harassment by the manager of the theater but no one was asked to say anything. This is a definite problem in the screen writing.
I had actually forgotten that James Daly was an actor. I remember him in television commercials. As his wife, Kim Hunter looks like she is annoyed with the whole plot. We suddenly find out that she has been contemplating leaving Daly for 5 years. What's stopping you lady, your life of luxury?
While John Frankenheimer always dealt with social problems, this one is cliché ridden.
Acting kudos goes to James Gregory as a hard-nosed police officer who adds to the problem by giving MacArthur a bad time. I think this picture was a cheap stunt to continue the theme of "Rebel Without A Cause." That Sal Mineo masterpiece also deals with wayward youth and a loss of interaction between parent and child. "Young Stranger" is adequate but certainly not in the league of "Rebel."
Whit Bissell is effective as the theater owner who is fed up with the behavior of all teenage movie-goers and wants to use MacArthur as an example. Usually a cowardly co-star in grade B films of the 1950s, Bissell shows his adeptness of really being a weakling.
With regard to Gregory, Frankenheimer would get a brilliant performance out of him in 1962's "The Manchurian Candidate." Remember him as the moronic senator married to Angela Lansbury?
From an affluent Beverly Hill home, MacArthur finds himself being harassed in a movie theater after a patron complained about his putting his legs on a chair. The problem is that there were plenty of people saw the harassment by the manager of the theater but no one was asked to say anything. This is a definite problem in the screen writing.
I had actually forgotten that James Daly was an actor. I remember him in television commercials. As his wife, Kim Hunter looks like she is annoyed with the whole plot. We suddenly find out that she has been contemplating leaving Daly for 5 years. What's stopping you lady, your life of luxury?
While John Frankenheimer always dealt with social problems, this one is cliché ridden.
Acting kudos goes to James Gregory as a hard-nosed police officer who adds to the problem by giving MacArthur a bad time. I think this picture was a cheap stunt to continue the theme of "Rebel Without A Cause." That Sal Mineo masterpiece also deals with wayward youth and a loss of interaction between parent and child. "Young Stranger" is adequate but certainly not in the league of "Rebel."
Whit Bissell is effective as the theater owner who is fed up with the behavior of all teenage movie-goers and wants to use MacArthur as an example. Usually a cowardly co-star in grade B films of the 1950s, Bissell shows his adeptness of really being a weakling.
With regard to Gregory, Frankenheimer would get a brilliant performance out of him in 1962's "The Manchurian Candidate." Remember him as the moronic senator married to Angela Lansbury?
- vincentlynch-moonoi
- Jun 24, 2019
- Permalink
Riding high on the success of "Rebel Without a Cause", came a tidal wave of 'teen' movies. Arguably this is one of the best. A very young McArthur excels here as the not really too troubled teen. The story concentrates more on perceptions of delinquency, than any traumatic occurrence. The supporting cast is memorable, Frankenheimer directs like an old pro. Just a story of a young man that finds others take his actions much too seriously.
... because by 1955 RKO was a sinking ship and Howard Hughes was tired of the play toy he had broken. He ended up selling to General Tire and Rubber who, opposite of Hughes, completely neglected it. They simply did not care that their product was a laughingstock because they were planning to use it as a tax write-off, which was very important in the days of 90% taxation.
But this film is pretty good. You have John Frankenheimer in his directorial debut, James MacArthur in the lead in only his third film appearance as the "young stranger", with veteran Kim Hunter as his mother. Character actors Whit Bissel and James Gregory turn in fine supporting performances.
Although this film is allegedly about juvenile delinquency, it isn't really. James MacArthur plays Hal Ditmar, the 16-year-old only child of movie producer Tom Ditmar and his wife Helen. Today such a teen would be completely isolated from all normal problems and normal people but, in the high taxation days of the 1950s, his family lives well enough and has a big house and a maid, but Hal goes to public high school, drives a beater of a car, and is friends with the most middling of middle class kids.
Hal goes to the movies one night with his best friend. A guy and his date sit down in the row in front of him. When Hal puts his feet up on the seat in front of him and next to the guy with the date, words are exchanged. The guy gets the theater manager who ejects Hal and his friend from the theater, but not before he demands that they go to his office for a reason he won't disclose. When Hal tries to leave the theater, the manager grabs him and Hal defends himself by punching the manager.
Of course, this is not the story the theater manager tells the police. He said he was assaulted without cause. So Hal is arrested after - 1. Exchanging words with an obnoxious fellow patron. 2. Being accused of delinquency by the manager in retaliation for all of the actual delinquents the manager never managed to catch 3. Being detained for no particular reason. 4. Defending himself when grabbed. The police and Hal's father believe the manager and won't even let Hal say what really happened. Complications ensue.
This is a really good examination of the price of post war success often being borne by the children of said post war successes who don't take time to get to know their own kids. In this case the wife feels left out too as success can be a demanding mistress. I'd recommend this entertaining yet rather obscure film.
But this film is pretty good. You have John Frankenheimer in his directorial debut, James MacArthur in the lead in only his third film appearance as the "young stranger", with veteran Kim Hunter as his mother. Character actors Whit Bissel and James Gregory turn in fine supporting performances.
Although this film is allegedly about juvenile delinquency, it isn't really. James MacArthur plays Hal Ditmar, the 16-year-old only child of movie producer Tom Ditmar and his wife Helen. Today such a teen would be completely isolated from all normal problems and normal people but, in the high taxation days of the 1950s, his family lives well enough and has a big house and a maid, but Hal goes to public high school, drives a beater of a car, and is friends with the most middling of middle class kids.
Hal goes to the movies one night with his best friend. A guy and his date sit down in the row in front of him. When Hal puts his feet up on the seat in front of him and next to the guy with the date, words are exchanged. The guy gets the theater manager who ejects Hal and his friend from the theater, but not before he demands that they go to his office for a reason he won't disclose. When Hal tries to leave the theater, the manager grabs him and Hal defends himself by punching the manager.
Of course, this is not the story the theater manager tells the police. He said he was assaulted without cause. So Hal is arrested after - 1. Exchanging words with an obnoxious fellow patron. 2. Being accused of delinquency by the manager in retaliation for all of the actual delinquents the manager never managed to catch 3. Being detained for no particular reason. 4. Defending himself when grabbed. The police and Hal's father believe the manager and won't even let Hal say what really happened. Complications ensue.
This is a really good examination of the price of post war success often being borne by the children of said post war successes who don't take time to get to know their own kids. In this case the wife feels left out too as success can be a demanding mistress. I'd recommend this entertaining yet rather obscure film.
Imagine a version of Rebel Without A Cause written by Joe Connelly and Bob Mosher with Tony Dow in the lead role. That's about what you get in this tale of teenage angst set in Beverly Hills. James MacArthur is Hal Ditmar, a high schooler with a crew cut, a letter jacket and a jalopy. His father (James Daly) is a movie producer and his mother (Kim Hunter) makes dinner in pearls and a stylish dress a la June Cleaver. But Hal isn't happy, so he goes to the movies and puts his feet on the seat in front of him. When he gets thrown out, a minor scuffle ensues and he pops the theater manager (Whit Bissell) in the mouth.
Police Sgt. Shipley (James Gregory) takes Hal to the station where he resists in the most benign fashion. This "hooliganism" (as Shipley refers to it) is the focus of the tension in this film. Not that punching an adult is nothing, but it's hardly the weighty societal crisis that this film portrays it to be, particularly given the antiseptic Hal, whose rebellion consists of driving too slowly in traffic and not eating his milk and cookies, yet still coming to the family dinner table in a coat and tie. His language even gets a bit coarse as he complains that the police will probably send him to the "crummy gas chamber." Golly gee whiz, Beave!
Good performances by Bissell and the ever-engaging Gregory give the film some weight, but it's still pretty tame, almost flirting with melodrama at times. It would be nice if this were the extent of all juvenile delinquency, but even by Eisenhower-era standards this is hardly worthy of the turmoil it causes. It almost comes off as hyper-propaganda...like a Reefer Madness for delinquency ("Ah, reckless youth, with your fast roadsters and your rumble seats!") It may have been hard hitting and relevant in 1957, but it's merely anachronistic and just a tad quaint in the 21st century.
Police Sgt. Shipley (James Gregory) takes Hal to the station where he resists in the most benign fashion. This "hooliganism" (as Shipley refers to it) is the focus of the tension in this film. Not that punching an adult is nothing, but it's hardly the weighty societal crisis that this film portrays it to be, particularly given the antiseptic Hal, whose rebellion consists of driving too slowly in traffic and not eating his milk and cookies, yet still coming to the family dinner table in a coat and tie. His language even gets a bit coarse as he complains that the police will probably send him to the "crummy gas chamber." Golly gee whiz, Beave!
Good performances by Bissell and the ever-engaging Gregory give the film some weight, but it's still pretty tame, almost flirting with melodrama at times. It would be nice if this were the extent of all juvenile delinquency, but even by Eisenhower-era standards this is hardly worthy of the turmoil it causes. It almost comes off as hyper-propaganda...like a Reefer Madness for delinquency ("Ah, reckless youth, with your fast roadsters and your rumble seats!") It may have been hard hitting and relevant in 1957, but it's merely anachronistic and just a tad quaint in the 21st century.
- sleestaker
- Dec 26, 2006
- Permalink
This eloquent, simple film makes a remarkably clear statement about a teenager and his father. A theatrical release, the director, John Frankenheimer, learned his craft in the early, challenging days of live television in New York City. Indeed, he directed the teleplay on which the film is based, "Deal a Blow," on the CBS drama series "Climax." "Young Stranger" represents his Hollywood debut. After a hiatus of four years, during which he would do more television, he returned to direct "The Young Savages" with Burt Lancaster and, a year after that, "All Fall Down" with Warren Beatty and Angela Lansbury.
The casting is competent with James Daly and Kim Hunter (particularly good) playing the parents of the title character performed by James MacArthur (his first theatrical film) who played the same role in the television version which was his first appearance on the small screen. Look for James Gregory and Whit Bissell in supporting roles.
The casting is competent with James Daly and Kim Hunter (particularly good) playing the parents of the title character performed by James MacArthur (his first theatrical film) who played the same role in the television version which was his first appearance on the small screen. Look for James Gregory and Whit Bissell in supporting roles.
Rebel Without a Cause was an interesting film, even with the histrionics of James Dean, an actor that was decent, but not as good as James McArthur, in my opinion. The storyline and direction of this film is also superior to the overrated Rebel Without a Cause. It is a true coming of age film about a young man in a slightly dysfunctional family (mostly the father), who has trouble getting anyone to believe the actual events of a minor incident. It is a very interesting perspective of this time period in American history. The father-son relationship is at the crux of the film, and I was very sensitive to that issue, as I am close to my son, Joe. A good study in growing pains of a teenager.
- arthur_tafero
- Jan 16, 2022
- Permalink
- JohnHowardReid
- Nov 23, 2017
- Permalink
I usually get a kick out of teenspoitation movies made in the '50, mainly because the characters and their attitudes seem so dated when seen today. So when this movie came up on Turner Classic Movies, you can be sure I was careful to tape it. The beginning of the movie seems to promise that it will be pretty campy. The teenage protagonist upset that he has to drive his own crummy car since his father won't let him use his brand new car? The teenage protagonist venting his building angst by putting his feet up on the chair in front of him in a movie theater? But not long after all that, the movie gets pretty serious - and compelling. You'll start to sympathize with the teenage protagonist (even though the movie doesn't make him TOTALLY likable), and understand why he is so upset, and why he does the things he does. MacArthur is actually pretty good in the title role, even though he seems to be just a little too old to be a teenager. And Frankenheimer's direction is overall pretty solid. Today's teenagers may think this to be tame stuff, but older viewers in a nostalgic mood will probably find this to be a pleasant surprise.
Hal Ditmar (James MacArthur) is a regular teen in the privaleged upper class suburbs. His mother Helen Ditmar (Kim Hunter) is a social butterfly. His father Tom Ditmar (James Daly) is a big film producer. He gets into a fight at the movies with the manager. He and his buddy are brought into the police station and get interrogated by Sgt. Shipley (James Gregory).
Rebel Without a Cause was 1955. There is a whole string of these troubled youth films. James Dean was great as a troubled teen and the audience loved him for it. In many ways, he's rebelling with cause. In this movie, Hal is just a jerk in that incident. It's interesting and MacArthur definitely has a chip on his shoulder. It takes a long while before he voices anything that would draw the audience to him. Eventually, he gets to an interesting exchange with his father and that deserves some comparing.
Rebel Without a Cause was 1955. There is a whole string of these troubled youth films. James Dean was great as a troubled teen and the audience loved him for it. In many ways, he's rebelling with cause. In this movie, Hal is just a jerk in that incident. It's interesting and MacArthur definitely has a chip on his shoulder. It takes a long while before he voices anything that would draw the audience to him. Eventually, he gets to an interesting exchange with his father and that deserves some comparing.
- SnoopyStyle
- Sep 16, 2023
- Permalink
In upscale Beverly Hills, angst-ridden 16-year-old James MacArthur (as Harold "Hal" Ditmar) wants to borrow his father's car to take pal Jeffrey Silver (as Jerry Doyle) out to the movies. Successful movie producer father James Daly (as Thomas "Tom" Ditmar) jerks young MacArthur around, teasingly. The lads wind up going out in MacArthur's battery-challenged jalopy. Obviously having problems relating to his dad, MacArthur acts bratty at the movies. He talks during the film and sticks his feet up over chairs in front, which especially annoys a man trying to get chummy with his female companion...
MacArthur and his young pal are told to leave the cinema, which seems like the best outcome. Then, oddly, MacArthur is asked to visit theater manager Whit Bissell (as Grubbs) in his office. Declining this invitation, young MacArthur gets in a scuffle and is taken to the police station. MacArthur claims he hit Mr. Bissell in self-defense, but Mr. Daly doesn't believe his son. While the action shifts to the police station, cops ticket Macarthur's jalopy. Having gone out to the movies in Westwood recently, note that it's still easy to get a parking ticket in Westwood. But, hardly anyone puts their feet up on the seat anymore...
Neatly-written by Robert Dozier, this is a feature-film re-make of director John Frankenheimer's "Climax!" TV series episode "Deal a Blow" (1955), which also starred young MacArthur. A few others reprised their parts, as well. In a tailor-made introductory role, MacArthur was very impressive. The son of acclaimed actress Helen Hayes and successful writer Charles MacArthur, James Macarthur became most well-known for his supporting role in the classic TV series "Hawaii Five-O". In a re-cast role, Daly is extraordinary as the father; his alienation from son and wife Kim Hunter (as Helen) is unexpectedly heart-rending...
An older teenager, herein, MacArthur and Jeff Silver (also from the original TV episode) give off more of a gay vibe than may have been intended. How the young men sit when driven home from the police station and what can be described as "the lawnmower scene" are our best evidence; moreover, there are no female interests to contradict speculation. That doesn't adversely affect the basic story, but the incidents where MacArthur punches Mr. Bissell look more violent with a slightly older teenager. In fact, the second altercation made this viewer think MacArthur killed the movie manager. And, it didn't look like self-defense...
****** The Young Stranger (2/1/57) John Frankenheimer ~ James MacArthur, James Daly, Kim Hunter, Jeffrey Silver
MacArthur and his young pal are told to leave the cinema, which seems like the best outcome. Then, oddly, MacArthur is asked to visit theater manager Whit Bissell (as Grubbs) in his office. Declining this invitation, young MacArthur gets in a scuffle and is taken to the police station. MacArthur claims he hit Mr. Bissell in self-defense, but Mr. Daly doesn't believe his son. While the action shifts to the police station, cops ticket Macarthur's jalopy. Having gone out to the movies in Westwood recently, note that it's still easy to get a parking ticket in Westwood. But, hardly anyone puts their feet up on the seat anymore...
Neatly-written by Robert Dozier, this is a feature-film re-make of director John Frankenheimer's "Climax!" TV series episode "Deal a Blow" (1955), which also starred young MacArthur. A few others reprised their parts, as well. In a tailor-made introductory role, MacArthur was very impressive. The son of acclaimed actress Helen Hayes and successful writer Charles MacArthur, James Macarthur became most well-known for his supporting role in the classic TV series "Hawaii Five-O". In a re-cast role, Daly is extraordinary as the father; his alienation from son and wife Kim Hunter (as Helen) is unexpectedly heart-rending...
An older teenager, herein, MacArthur and Jeff Silver (also from the original TV episode) give off more of a gay vibe than may have been intended. How the young men sit when driven home from the police station and what can be described as "the lawnmower scene" are our best evidence; moreover, there are no female interests to contradict speculation. That doesn't adversely affect the basic story, but the incidents where MacArthur punches Mr. Bissell look more violent with a slightly older teenager. In fact, the second altercation made this viewer think MacArthur killed the movie manager. And, it didn't look like self-defense...
****** The Young Stranger (2/1/57) John Frankenheimer ~ James MacArthur, James Daly, Kim Hunter, Jeffrey Silver
- wes-connors
- Mar 11, 2015
- Permalink
All but Forgotten, the Juvenile Delinquent(JD)"Problem" of the 1950's that included "Rebellious" Teenagers "Ripping It Up", Riding New Found Freedom and Pocket Money from Post War Booty to the Beat of "Rock n' Roll" and Other Things Their Parents found Alien.
This Tepid, Talky Debut from the Great "Social Commentary" Director John Frankenheimer, is a Well Acted Display of Dramatic Intensity, but Not Much else.
It is Beefed Up TV that is Stagy and don't Look for Any Cinematic Flourishes because there aren't any. It is as Straight Forward as it gets relying on Words and Close-Up Expressions Combined with mild Generational Misunderstandings and Communication Breakdowns.
This is a Not Bad, Competent, Professional looking Movie but Static, and even in 1957 it is a Wonder why anyone would Venture Off the Couch and go to the Theater to see this when the some of the Better Television Anthologies were doing Virtually the Same Thing Night After Night, Week After Week.
In Fact, that's where this came from. The Story with some of the Same Actors, and the Same Director, came from TV, and They Turned this into John Frankenheimer's Film Debut, but Nothing much was Added or Enhanced.
Overall, Worth a Watch for the Director's Completest Fans. But it isn't anything Special and Except for the Social Commentary (Teenage Angst) that was New in the Fifties, there isn't Much here to Recommend.
This Tepid, Talky Debut from the Great "Social Commentary" Director John Frankenheimer, is a Well Acted Display of Dramatic Intensity, but Not Much else.
It is Beefed Up TV that is Stagy and don't Look for Any Cinematic Flourishes because there aren't any. It is as Straight Forward as it gets relying on Words and Close-Up Expressions Combined with mild Generational Misunderstandings and Communication Breakdowns.
This is a Not Bad, Competent, Professional looking Movie but Static, and even in 1957 it is a Wonder why anyone would Venture Off the Couch and go to the Theater to see this when the some of the Better Television Anthologies were doing Virtually the Same Thing Night After Night, Week After Week.
In Fact, that's where this came from. The Story with some of the Same Actors, and the Same Director, came from TV, and They Turned this into John Frankenheimer's Film Debut, but Nothing much was Added or Enhanced.
Overall, Worth a Watch for the Director's Completest Fans. But it isn't anything Special and Except for the Social Commentary (Teenage Angst) that was New in the Fifties, there isn't Much here to Recommend.
- LeonLouisRicci
- Mar 31, 2015
- Permalink
- bigmommafive
- Jun 28, 2019
- Permalink
I first saw this movie in the early 70s and have loved it since. I have also met the late actor, James MacArthur, a few years back in Burbank, CA, and talked with him about this film, Frankenheimer's first, that which by the way, is not "cliché ridden" as the other and only other person to review this film has suggested.
MacArthur's performance is remarkable, as is the performances by Kim Hunter, who doesn't "look bored with the plot," alluding to the terrible review of this film above, and James Daly and James Gregory, too, veteran actors like Hunter, share in this rich drama of youth angst and a neglective father.
Whit Bissell, who portrays the theatre manager (I used to work at the Bruin Theatre in Westwood, used in the movie), and Bissell plays the role with great accuracy: I have certainly known theatre managers like this character, and many a pleasant ones. Bissell was a gem of a character actor.
Leonard Rosenmann, who scored the film, also did "Rebel Without a Cause," which this film is unfairly and often compared to. This film is far closer to the truth of what it was like growing up in Los Angeles at the time, I know, I was there and its treatment of themes peculiar to youth experience and behind the scenes parental conflicts, especially among the wealthy families that I knew, are also accurate. This film portrays the lives of real people who lived then, and what we were like then with great attention to detail.
The ending of the film, too, offers the kind of needed optimism that "Rebel Without A Cause" did not offer. I love "Rebel" but it is often very overstated while this film is understated.
Please do not think there is anything cliché-ish about this film.
James MacArthur said to us that this film was his favorite film that he did. It was too bad that Disney got its hands on him, though a couple of those films were excellent as was "Spencer's Mountain," with Henry Fonda. The Young Stranger is a quiet masterpiece.
MacArthur's performance is remarkable, as is the performances by Kim Hunter, who doesn't "look bored with the plot," alluding to the terrible review of this film above, and James Daly and James Gregory, too, veteran actors like Hunter, share in this rich drama of youth angst and a neglective father.
Whit Bissell, who portrays the theatre manager (I used to work at the Bruin Theatre in Westwood, used in the movie), and Bissell plays the role with great accuracy: I have certainly known theatre managers like this character, and many a pleasant ones. Bissell was a gem of a character actor.
Leonard Rosenmann, who scored the film, also did "Rebel Without a Cause," which this film is unfairly and often compared to. This film is far closer to the truth of what it was like growing up in Los Angeles at the time, I know, I was there and its treatment of themes peculiar to youth experience and behind the scenes parental conflicts, especially among the wealthy families that I knew, are also accurate. This film portrays the lives of real people who lived then, and what we were like then with great attention to detail.
The ending of the film, too, offers the kind of needed optimism that "Rebel Without A Cause" did not offer. I love "Rebel" but it is often very overstated while this film is understated.
Please do not think there is anything cliché-ish about this film.
James MacArthur said to us that this film was his favorite film that he did. It was too bad that Disney got its hands on him, though a couple of those films were excellent as was "Spencer's Mountain," with Henry Fonda. The Young Stranger is a quiet masterpiece.
- campbell2128
- Dec 31, 2010
- Permalink
John Frankenheimer first made a name for himself on TV but this, his cinematic directorial debut, already displays touches of considerable accomplishment, and he certainly extracts top notch performances from all actors, most notably MacArthur as the youngster getting into trouble for misbehaving at a movie theater; Kim Hunter and James Daly as his parents with differing levels of concern; and James Gregory, as the police sergeant who refuses to believe MacArthur's version but ultimately realizes his mistake.
It all goes back to a time after WWII when youngsters were growing in a society increasingly prone to violence. One very authentic detail: Hal (MacArthur) does not have a girlfriend at age 16. This situation is entirely dealt with at home and police precinct, with a brief visit to a friend whose father finds MacArthur a bad influence. There is no Natalie Wood here, unlike what James Dean had in REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE (1955). Here the beef is with his father, who spends too much time working to give enough attention to his beautiful wife (Hunter) who sleeps in a different bed, and to his son. Daly plays very capably the distant father used to running the show at work, and not listening to anyone, especially not his family.
I found this a very engaging and believable film, with sharp dialogue, and competent cinematography. 7/10.
It all goes back to a time after WWII when youngsters were growing in a society increasingly prone to violence. One very authentic detail: Hal (MacArthur) does not have a girlfriend at age 16. This situation is entirely dealt with at home and police precinct, with a brief visit to a friend whose father finds MacArthur a bad influence. There is no Natalie Wood here, unlike what James Dean had in REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE (1955). Here the beef is with his father, who spends too much time working to give enough attention to his beautiful wife (Hunter) who sleeps in a different bed, and to his son. Daly plays very capably the distant father used to running the show at work, and not listening to anyone, especially not his family.
I found this a very engaging and believable film, with sharp dialogue, and competent cinematography. 7/10.
- adrianovasconcelos
- Mar 8, 2024
- Permalink
- Sean_Biggins
- Jun 9, 2018
- Permalink
When the story begins, Hal (James MacArthur) and his friend are at a movie theater and Hal is behaving a bit like a jerk with the man sitting in front of him. He SHOULD have taken his feet off the chair and that would have been the end of it. However, Hal wouldn't back down and the man goes to get the manager. At this point, Hal backs off and tries to just leave the theater to diffuse the situation. But the theater owner has an usher grab him and drag him back into the theater and, not surprisingly, a scuffle breaks out. Hal slugs the manager, as he was trying to get away. Soon, he's arrested and the police and the boy's father both refuse to listen to him and hear his side of the story.
Following this incident, Hal is very mouthy and angry. Much of it you can understand--his father, in particular, would not listen nor support him at all. And, in addition, it seems that Dad's way of handling things is to lecture and then bail his son out of trouble...but the boy is longing for a real connection with the man. At the same time, it becomes obvious that the father has also alienated his wife, as he is very closed emotionally with her as well. It becomes obvious that Hal and the family could use some therapy...not the police.
This is a really exceptional family drama. The characters and dialog seem very real and the story is very moving. Well worth your time.
Following this incident, Hal is very mouthy and angry. Much of it you can understand--his father, in particular, would not listen nor support him at all. And, in addition, it seems that Dad's way of handling things is to lecture and then bail his son out of trouble...but the boy is longing for a real connection with the man. At the same time, it becomes obvious that the father has also alienated his wife, as he is very closed emotionally with her as well. It becomes obvious that Hal and the family could use some therapy...not the police.
This is a really exceptional family drama. The characters and dialog seem very real and the story is very moving. Well worth your time.
- planktonrules
- Aug 12, 2018
- Permalink
John Frankenheimer made his big screen directorial debut in this modestly budgeted film about a growing distance between father and son, hence the title The Young Stranger. Playing the title role was young James MacArthur as the rich, but troubled teen.
MacArthur is a high spirited kid no one bad really just a bit rough around the edges. One night he and friend Jeffrey Silver were getting obnoxious at a movie theater and got ejected from the film. But Whit Bissell the theater manager just didn't want to leave it at that. He tried to restrain MacArthur and Silver and MacArthur punches out Bissell.
After Bissell makes a police complaint it's a three cornered question of credibility between MacArthur, father James Daly, and police sergeant in the juvenile division James Gregory. Both the adults unquestionably take the side of the adult Bissell who clearly overreacted to the situation in his theater.
Daly is a noted film producer though I do say he seemed to live rather modestly for one of those. Clear he doesn't know his son. Mother Kim Hunter sees what's going and tries to bridge the gap.
Everybody here acquits themselves well in this drama. Frankenheimer's next big screen credit would also be a story about juvenile delinquency, The Young Savages. He might have gone on as a director of youth oriented films, but he certainly expanded his range.
There's also an inside joke here from Universal Pictures which released this film about the head of another studio. There's a crack made about the aphorisms Daly is constantly quoting that he learned from his dad back as a kid in Nebraska. Darryl F. Zanuck over at 20th Century Fox was famously from Wahoo, Nebraska. I'm sure Zanuck got the point if he saw the film.
MacArthur was too clean cut to ever be another James Dean. But his career certainly was not modest even if The Young Stranger is.
MacArthur is a high spirited kid no one bad really just a bit rough around the edges. One night he and friend Jeffrey Silver were getting obnoxious at a movie theater and got ejected from the film. But Whit Bissell the theater manager just didn't want to leave it at that. He tried to restrain MacArthur and Silver and MacArthur punches out Bissell.
After Bissell makes a police complaint it's a three cornered question of credibility between MacArthur, father James Daly, and police sergeant in the juvenile division James Gregory. Both the adults unquestionably take the side of the adult Bissell who clearly overreacted to the situation in his theater.
Daly is a noted film producer though I do say he seemed to live rather modestly for one of those. Clear he doesn't know his son. Mother Kim Hunter sees what's going and tries to bridge the gap.
Everybody here acquits themselves well in this drama. Frankenheimer's next big screen credit would also be a story about juvenile delinquency, The Young Savages. He might have gone on as a director of youth oriented films, but he certainly expanded his range.
There's also an inside joke here from Universal Pictures which released this film about the head of another studio. There's a crack made about the aphorisms Daly is constantly quoting that he learned from his dad back as a kid in Nebraska. Darryl F. Zanuck over at 20th Century Fox was famously from Wahoo, Nebraska. I'm sure Zanuck got the point if he saw the film.
MacArthur was too clean cut to ever be another James Dean. But his career certainly was not modest even if The Young Stranger is.
- bkoganbing
- Mar 31, 2017
- Permalink
A teenage boy estranged from his wealthy father gets into trouble with the law.
Earnest little teen-age drama. I'm not surprised the movie came from a TV play since the production resembles a Playhouse 90 drama from TV's so-called Golden Age. MacArthur performs wonderfully as the alienated son of a wealthy self-centered dad (Daly). This was the kid's first acting outing and he mostly low-keys it, showing the repression he suffers because of an overly cocksure dad.
Of course, the concern with "juvenile delinquency" dates the show to the 1950's, conjuring up images of a James Dean, a temptation MacArthur wisely avoids. Nonetheless, as in Dean's Rebel Without a Cause (1955), the boy's problems boil down to a dysfunctional dad—too weak in Dean's case, too strong in MacArthur's. Hal's (MacArthur) refusal to come up with an easy apology because he knows he's right about the punch-out in the theater, shows strong character that dad fails to consider. I too, thought why not apologize even if it betrays the facts since that would end the problem with the law. But Hal stays true to the facts because he knows he's right. All in all, it's a good dramatic crux.
The movie's perfectly cast, though I have to say the excellent actress Kim Hunter is largely wasted in a role a hundred lesser performers could have handled. Newcomer Frankenheimer directs with a sure and knowing hand that foreshadows his outstanding Hollywood career-- The Manchurian Candidate (1962) and Seconds (1966), among others.
No, there're no fast car races, or sexy teen girls, standard features of teen movies of the day. In fact, the only action is the set-to in the theater and the lawnmower hijinks. Nevertheless, the movie remains a compelling little human interest drama that manages to survive the decades, thanks mainly to MacArthur.
Earnest little teen-age drama. I'm not surprised the movie came from a TV play since the production resembles a Playhouse 90 drama from TV's so-called Golden Age. MacArthur performs wonderfully as the alienated son of a wealthy self-centered dad (Daly). This was the kid's first acting outing and he mostly low-keys it, showing the repression he suffers because of an overly cocksure dad.
Of course, the concern with "juvenile delinquency" dates the show to the 1950's, conjuring up images of a James Dean, a temptation MacArthur wisely avoids. Nonetheless, as in Dean's Rebel Without a Cause (1955), the boy's problems boil down to a dysfunctional dad—too weak in Dean's case, too strong in MacArthur's. Hal's (MacArthur) refusal to come up with an easy apology because he knows he's right about the punch-out in the theater, shows strong character that dad fails to consider. I too, thought why not apologize even if it betrays the facts since that would end the problem with the law. But Hal stays true to the facts because he knows he's right. All in all, it's a good dramatic crux.
The movie's perfectly cast, though I have to say the excellent actress Kim Hunter is largely wasted in a role a hundred lesser performers could have handled. Newcomer Frankenheimer directs with a sure and knowing hand that foreshadows his outstanding Hollywood career-- The Manchurian Candidate (1962) and Seconds (1966), among others.
No, there're no fast car races, or sexy teen girls, standard features of teen movies of the day. In fact, the only action is the set-to in the theater and the lawnmower hijinks. Nevertheless, the movie remains a compelling little human interest drama that manages to survive the decades, thanks mainly to MacArthur.
- dougdoepke
- Feb 4, 2013
- Permalink