The Fly (1958) Poster

(1958)

User Reviews

Review this title
163 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A nightmare
drmality-122 June 2005
The "help me, help meeeee" scene revolted and scared me so much as a young child that it was years before I could see this movie again. Even now I cringe when I witness that nightmarish scene. As good as Cronenberg's movie is (and it is very good), there is nothing that surpasses the delirious horror of the man-fly in the spider's grasp.

Elsewhere, the movie is rather subdued. In some spots, almost too much so. Although the first revelation of The Fly's appearance is another classic spot...the multiple reflections was a great touch. Like all great monsters, the Fly has a very sympathetic edge to it. We are revolted by the horror of this monster but we feel overwhelming pity for him as well.

Vincent Price does a workman-like job in a rather blasé part. Usually he adds a special touch to a film, but really, any number of actors could have played his part here.

The scientific basis of this movie is pure rubbish, as there is no way that insect and human parts could biologically interact with each other. The result of such a mixture would be instantly dead in real life.

But that doesn't matter here. A nightmare has its own logic. And "The Fly" is a nightmare.
71 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classic 1950s pop-horror, gets under your skin
secondtake7 July 2010
The Fly (1958)

You might be convinced to see a movie just because it has Vincent Price and Herbert Marshall in it--they come from different backgrounds, but both are serious actors with nuance and clearly chiseled personalities. And they definitely raise the movie up.

But it's the story that is the star here. A Ray Bradbury kind of science fiction, where a futuristic idea enters middle America, and where something goes terribly, bizarrely wrong. If you think about it it's disturbing, but the movie doesn't pause to let you think. One of its strengths is that it never flags. And the main character, the handsome father and scientist (who creates the invention of the century in his basement), is brilliant. He's suave, alternately relaxed and obsessed, reasonable and believable even when talking about the unbelievable.

The flaws are so obvious they you can skim over them--the fly effects at the end, their stupidity at catching and losing the fly, the notion of insanity, the television kind of family interactions--but it does make the movie more of an entertainment than some fine art classic. But hey, that's what it's supposed to be, and really enjoyable. Even in parts brilliant. Watch it!
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's a bad day to be a fly
Smells_Like_Cheese15 April 2009
The Fly is a movie I have just been dying to see, I have heard a lot about this movie, mainly the infamous "Help me! Help me!" scene. But of course the number one reason being that this is the original to the remake with Jeff Goldblum which is an incredible movie in itself, but I was curious what the original would be about. Honestly I was thinking that it was going to be very cheesy, it's a 1950's horror movie that would probably be over the top, but honestly, from the very beginning you get gore, which was odd, but sickly enough I love it! I am also a huge Vincent Price fan, this is the man of the classic B horror movies and his voice and presence make these movies worth the watch. So I finally got to see this on netflix, I absolutely loved The Fly. Is this better than the remake? Honestly, the remake is more realistic on what would happen if this really did occur, but don't overlook the original, as cheesy as a fly in a giant trench coat can be, it's all good and this story is tons of fun and really scary.

A woman named Helene Delembre phones her brother-in-law, Francois Delambre to tell him that she has just murdered her husband. Francois calls in the police and she admits killing him but refuses to say why. Later, Francois tricks her into telling the story to him and Police Inspector Charas. A scientist, Andre Delambre, has invented a teleportation device. After a few failed attempts, he succeeds with living organisms, deciding to go for the ultimate risk and transport himself. The first time works, but, unknown to him, a fly enters the cabin with him and the two are hopelessly scrambled together. The scientist emerges as a half-man, half-fly, a human with a fly's head, leg and arm/claw. His wife finds out something is wrong as she now sees him with a cloth over his head and a hidden arm. He eventually tells his wife what has happened and she first sees his claw and screams, then later sees his fly head and screams more. His wife, son and maid try to find the "fly with a white head" and fail. The son had caught it just after the accident but had been made to let it go, before any of them knew what it was. Andre attempts to reverse the process to return himself to normal, but fails and when he realizes that his mind is being overtaken by that of the fly he asks his wife to end his suffering by killing him with a heavy machine press.

The Fly is a fantastic and thrilling movie. I know that the ending sequence of "Help me! Help me!" was cheesy and over the top to some, but to me it was just plain creepy, it really scared me. The whole atmosphere of the film just felt uncomfortable and disturbing. Granted, I know these were not top of the line make up effects with the fly, I do have to laugh juts a little bit with seeing a fly in a trench coat. But still it was effective and made for a great sci-fi story. I love these old movies for a specific reason, this was the time when film meant something to the cast and crew making it and The Fly was made to give people the chills. It's just rare now-a-days, if this was made in today's world, it would be all gore and just stupid. So I do recommend that you see this film if you are looking for a good scare. Both this and the remake are terrific films and are a ton of fun to watch.

8/10
42 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scenes engraved on the mind
existential28 August 2000
It's been said again and again that this is a good horror film. A Very Good film. But it is more than that.

I can still hear with my mind's ear (is that right?) the sound of the hydraulic press "WHUMP" and the echo. Then again that "WHUMP" ... is there another sound experience that reverberates through a movie like that?

Sure, surround sound, THX, all that tech stuff, but the sound as the manifestation of the crime that encircles this story, the horror as the mind tries to put together the images that (finally) is seen in a flashback as this scene bookends the start and "finish" of the plot.

The inner struggle of the scientist as he fights with his human hand to control the spasms of his "fly" arm is both horrible and heart-wrenching.

The shock as the cloth is torn away from the scientist's head... the fly's POV shot with facets and mirrors of the the screaming face of the scientist's poor wife! The scene at the spider's web as the shrill voice begs "help me... help me"

The horror of murder of a man/thing and a thing/man being shown and even compared in sharp (but obvious) dialogue.

You MUST see this and experience the earlier days of horror -when classics like this, like "The Thing From Another World," like "It, the Terror From Beyond Space" (the original model of Alien) exhibit a freshness and a palpable terror that remakes cannot capture, whatever wonderful special effects are thrown in to add to the creepiness. Sure these later gorefest horror films are good. I buy them all the time. But they are a different genre. The Fly with Vincent Price is NOT the same story as The Fly with Jeff Goldblum. It's not really a remake as a retelling.

See the original. It is rich with emotion and intelligence, not to mention some pretty fine acting for what was really a "B" movie.
73 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The original still has lots to offer
AlsExGal24 November 2023
"The Fly," directed by Kurt Neumann and released in 1958, stands as a timeless science fiction classic that seamlessly weaves suspense, horror, and tragedy into a compelling narrative. This iconic film, based on a short story by George Langelaan, explores the consequences of scientific curiosity gone awry and remains a benchmark in the annals of classic horror cinema.

The plot centers around the brilliant scientist André Delambre, portrayed by David Hedison, who becomes the victim of his own groundbreaking teleportation experiment. The film unfolds as André's wife, Helene, played by Patricia Owens, recounts the chilling events leading to her husband's gruesome demise to André's brother, François (Vincent Price). The narrative structure, with its flashback-driven storytelling, adds an air of mystery and anticipation, heightening the film's overall tension.

Vincent Price delivers a stellar performance as François Delambre, bringing a perfect blend of sympathy and unease to the role. His on-screen presence is captivating, and he skillfully conveys the conflicting emotions of a grieving brother seeking the truth behind André's tragic fate.

The practical effects used to portray André's metamorphosis are a testament to the creativity of the filmmakers of the era. The gradual revelation of the horrifying consequences of the teleportation experiment is both shocking and morbidly fascinating. The iconic "fly head" remains an indelible image in the history of cinematic horror, a testament to the film's impact on the genre.

"The Fly" is not merely a creature feature; it delves into deeper themes of the ethical implications of scientific experimentation and the unforeseen consequences of playing with the laws of nature. The film raises poignant questions about the limits of human knowledge and the dangers of tampering with forces beyond our understanding.

The atmospheric score composed by Paul Sawtell and Bert Shefter enhances the film's mood, contributing to its overall sense of foreboding. The use of shadows and lighting, classic elements of film noir, further heightens the tension and adds a layer of sophistication to the movie.

While some aspects of the film may appear dated to modern audiences, "The Fly" remains a compelling and thought-provoking cinematic experience. Its enduring legacy is evident in the numerous adaptations and references it has inspired over the decades. The 1958 version of "The Fly" continues to captivate audiences, reminding us that even in the realm of science fiction, there are moral lessons to be learned from the consequences of unchecked scientific ambition.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
....said the spider to the fly.
bsmith555213 December 2002
"The Fly" is one of the better giant insect movies of the 50s. It starts out with the discovery by a night watchman of the grisly killing of scientist Andre Delambre (Al Hedison aka David Hedison) apparently at the hands of his wife Helene (Patricia Owens). She calls Andre's brother Francois (Vincent Price) to tell him of the tragedy. Francois in turn, calls in Inspector Charas (Herbert Marshall) and together they question Helene to try to find out what happened.

In a flashback, we learn that Andre had been experimenting with transporting matter at light speed from one point to another. When he reached the stage of using a human in the tests, he had used himself. Unfortunately, when he transported himself, unbeknownst to him a common fly had been in the disintegrator with him. When they re-integrated things were not quite as they had been before. Of course no one really believes Helene's story until Francois and the Inspector are shown the unfortunate fly by Andre and Helene's son Philippe (Charles Herbert).

Director Kurt Neumann builds up the suspense by first letting us guess what has happened in the laboratory and then delaying the unmasking of Andre as long as possible. That scene reminded me of the unmasking of the Phantom in Lon Chaney's "The Phantom of the Opera" (1925). The wide screen is used to great effect in that scene when Helene first sees what has happened to her husband, and we then see multiple images of her, much in the way that we believe a fly would see it, screaming in terror.

The fly makeup was, I thought, quite convincing and who can ever forget the final scene when a spider is closing in on the title character (Help me, please...Help me..).
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slick and "adult" sci-fi.
gridoon28 October 2001
A slick, clever, engaging and unique (if a bit slow-paced at first) sci-fi story. Although the special effects leave something to be desired, especially if you've seen the incredible (and incredibly nauseating) images of the 1986 remake, the film's restrained approach to horror can be very pleasurable if you get used to it, and the script is stronger and more character-driven than the one of Cronenberg's version. A surprisingly good film. (***)
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ah, I don't think a fly swatter is going to work!
lost-in-limbo23 February 2006
After killing her husband Helene Delambre recounts the story of why she done it. Her husband was a scientist who was deeply into his work and through those long days and weeks he makes a big breakthrough in science by inventing a teleportation machine that can transmit matter from one spot to another. After some glitches he fine tunes the device and decides to test it by using himself as a guinea pig. While, in the process of this test, a housefly gets caught inside with him and when he emerges from the other capsule he shares its genetic structure and physical attributes.

"The Fly" is classic Sci-Fi / horror from the 50s and what a nice surprise this was! Unlike many of its kind in the 50s, this one didn't have a childish feel. The context may seem silly here, but its executed with enough skill and handled in a relax manner by director Kurt Neumann to set above the rest. Just don't be expecting a monster on the rampage tale. This one veers more towards a much more broaden and imaginative story with a certain eeriness contained in its psychological material rather than visuals. Even though it doesn't scare you witless, it still does provide a couple of memorable and ingenious shocks that are hard to put out of your mind. The film opens with the horrific outcome of Helene's husband Andre and then it goes into flashback mode where we learn the fate of Dr. Andre Delambre. What does make it surprisingly good is that we're treated with such passionately vivid characters and a interesting set-up that pulls you in by taking a more serious approach with a dabble of irony along the way. The talkative first hour slowly builds up to its taut last half-an-hour, where we get a smart and venomously bleak climax. Although, it could have done without that preachy conclusion. The rational script by James Clavell works by being incredibly dense with it thriving on some quick wit and sincerity. The story is more about a woman trying to save the man she loves as he slowly fights the genetic effects of the fly's DNA. He may seem hideous on the outside, but inside he is still more so human and he's trying his best to keep control of his dieing humanity. This is proved by how much he cares for his family's safety when he's willingly to take his own life for the best of everyone. It's practical story telling at its best.

The look of the film is top shape with it being shot in vibrant Technicolor and the key is that the deformity is kept hidden, but when it's revealed it actually stands up rather well. It's ugly, that's for sure, but still it looks rather competent. They're also an inventive touch when we see the creature for the first time with multiple frames being used to represent the reflection from human fly's eyes. In Cronenberg's version we see the grotesque transformation, but because of the times and effects we don't see it here, but more so the aftermath of the mishap. All of the devices and gadgets in Andre's lab are well presented and the mounted score adds in a forceful touch with nice crisp sound effects. The performances are more than great by the likes of Al Edison, Patricia Owens, and Herbert Marshall and even though Vincent Price had a supporting role, you'll be in awe of his effortlessly suave performance.

An excellent classic of its field that's more concern about telling a moving and fascinating story than just giving us pointless action and cheap thrills to spice up proceedings. The more you stick it out, the more compelling it does become.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the classic 50's sci fi films.
theshadow9089 May 2006
The Fly tells the story of an eager scientist named Andre Delambre. He is happily married and has a son. He has the perfect suburban life. That all changes when he invents a device that can transport inanimate objects, but it has trouble transporting live matter. When he tries it on himself, a fly gets into the chamber with him, and their particles mix up giving Andre the head and arm of a fly, and giving the fly Andre's head and arm.

The Fly isn't an overly terrifying film, but the plot is really interesting. The film starts off as a murder mystery, and slowly evolves into a mix of sci fi and horror as we see the transformed Andre Delambre's mind slowly seep away while being replaced with the fly's. The make-up is really good for a 1950's movie, and it's almost believable that the scientist's head was replaced with a giant fly head.

The characters in the film are all portrayed by great actors of the time, such as David "Al" Hedison as Andre/The Fly and horror master Vincent Price as Andre's brother Francois. The Fly offers up good acting and a great plot and should be recognized for its artistic effect on movies. If you're looking for a classic to watch, pick this up.

7/10
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
creepy beyond compare
mpndas21312 November 2005
in terms of creepiness, this flick takes a back seat to no horror film. the goldblum et al remake is a gory over-the-top, special-effects show-off in comparison. instead this one grabs your psychological neck, shakes it about and forces you to answer serious questions regarding the scientific exploits of man. while doing so it hermetically seals you in a world of misguided, pitiless hubris. if that sounds like a bit too much, just give it your time and try to go to sleep without thinking, "why the hell would anyone proceed so far" and without thinking of ways to save the poor, doomed scientist. it is a tale of inevitability and loss that brings into stark contrast the foolish doings of man against a backdrop of an inhumane and unforgiving nature. view at your own risk... do not view at your own horror- enjoyment's peril!
28 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
better than most 50s B-movie horrors
SnoopyStyle18 June 2015
In a Montreal machine shop, scientist Andre Delambre (Al Hedison) is found crush to death with his wife Helene (Patricia Owens) at the controls. She calls to confess to his brother Francois (Vincent Price). With the head crushed, Francois identifies the body with a long scar on his leg. Helene's confession seems suspicious and Andre's basement lab is trashed. Helene seems obsessed with flies and Francois pretends to have captured a white-headed fly. Helene recounts the story to him and Inspector Charas. Andre had succeeded in making a teleportation device.

This is much better than a simple 50's B-movie. The story is actually quite compelling. The acting is relatively good. Vincent Price is playing it straight. The production looks good. The directions are a little stiff which is the style of the day. It is still the story that is so great and the reveal is absolutely iconic.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Thizzzz izzzz exzzzzellent zzzztuff!
Coventry24 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Never thought that a movie involving people chasing a fly for half of the time could be so fascinating! "The Fly" is a genuine horror / sci-fi classic and fundamental viewing for everyone who was ever interested in either of these (or both, of course) genres. The whole premise of this milestone is silly and incredibly grotesque, yet very disturbing and it's brought to an even higher quality-level by the top-class performances of a devoted cast. Hedinson stars as the brilliant scientist Andre Delambre who discovered a method to transfer matter from one capsule to another and – convinced of his safety – he uses himself as a guinea pig to test if it works with humans, too. Terror begins when an ordinary housefly accidentally makes the transfer with him and the two beings exchange heads and a limb. Slowly going mad, Hedison has to beg his wife Helene to destroy what's left of him and his invention, because it's too dangerous for the world. One of the reasons why this film is so compelling is because of the ingenious structure. The story opens with Hedinson's brother (another great role for Vincent Price) receiving a call from a hysterical Helene who claims to have killed her husband and, for a long time, we're left in the dark whether she committed an act of madness…or a favor to her husband. "The Fly" contains several classic scenes (in one way or another, everybody must know about the "spider-web" finale by now) and the special effects are more than satisfying. Great film! Terrific entertainment!!
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Dipteran Disaster...
Xstal22 April 2023
Andre Delambre pays a terrible price, a schoolboy error leaves him trapped in a vice, takes his lips and his kiss, leaves him with proboscis, and looking like he's in disguise; after trying to make a machine, that Star Trek would make quite pristine, a transformative scrambler, a relocating sampler, if you're a cat, it can make you unseen; but trespassers will make you cry, causing multiple views from your eye, change your lifestyle and diet, larger version of a gnat, as you take to the skies and you fly.

A classic of the 1950s Sci-Fi revolution, as bonkers as any of them, and just as thoroughly enjoyable all these years later.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Teleportation Gone Wrong...
AaronCapenBanner16 October 2013
David Hedison stars as scientist and inventor Andre Delambre, who has created a teleporting machine capable of transmitting matter from place to place in enclosed cubicles. After one experiment with the cat goes wrong(poor Dandelion!) he tries again with himself, only a tiny housefly is in there with him, causing them to switch heads and an arm! His wife Helene, along with son Phillipe, try to help him, as does his brother Francois(played by Vincent Price) by locating the fly, which has flown away, in order to reverse the process, but it sadly doesn't work out... Popular thriller has some effective makeup, and a legendary climax, which is still disturbing, but is otherwise far too slow to overcome the ludicrous central premise. The cat scene is equally disturbing to me! Followed by two sequels, then later remade.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
As a child in the theater I screamed and had bad dreams....
domfranco5116 May 2001
As a child in the theater I screamed and had bad dreams.... Then as a teenager I watched the "Fly" on TV and still Jumped back in fear at the sight of that horrible face! A few years later my friends and I watched it on TV again, but this time I turned down the sound at the scary scenes ( theorizing that the music was the cause of the fear) but even at low volume the haunting cries of "Help me...Help me" gave me the chills. A MUST SEE DF.
36 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Don't worry Andre, I'll find that fly!"
classicsoncall6 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It's funny how faulty one's memory can be about a film seen for the first time almost fifty years ago. With today's viewing, I'm pleased to honor it with my vote for best horror film made in color that should have been done in black and white. That's how I remember it, along with Vincent Price's other classics of the era - 1959's "The Bat" and "House on Haunted Hill". Those WERE in glorious B&W and I couldn't think of them in any other way.

Say, did you catch that great, almost subliminal fly buzzing in the opening credits set to music? That was a neat touch setting the stage for the horror to follow. And horror there was, although interspersed with comic elements that oozed their way through, unintentional though they might have been. Like when Helene Delambre (Patricia Owens) gets hysterical at the housekeeper (Kathleen Freeman) and demands - "I told you to find that fly"! There's also the double entendre moment near the end when Francois (Price) demands of Inspector Charas (Herbert Marshall) a way to redeem his sister-in-law of murder. His response - "There is, show me the fly"!

No need to get into the nuts and bolts of the story here, enough reviewers on this board have done that already. However I haven't read about anyone making the connection between Andre Delambre's (Al/David Hedison) teleportation machine and the beam me up chamber 'Star Trek' would utilize less than a decade later. I don't recall any reconstructed cellular mishaps on that show, although I could be wrong about that. Now there would have been a story.

So you have that great fly head making up the creature costume, along with the claw-arm that goes into histrionic fits whenever Helene is around. Goes to show what can be done with the power of suggestion over huge and expensive special effects. The multiple view image of Helen through the fly eyes was also a neat touch. Makes me wonder though how a fly ever manages to find anything when an object is all over the place. Have to think about that.

If you can't get enough of pictures like these, I've already mentioned a couple of Vincent Price's classics earlier. For a more direct knock off of "The Fly", you only need look again to the following year, 1959, when Roger Corman did a nifty little creature feature called "The Wasp Woman", proving once again that beauty is only skin deep. Had the producers gone the extra mile, they could have staged a wedding film between The Fly and The Wasp Woman. The sequels alone would have kept them busy as bees.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Don't Tell Me to Buzz Off!"
Hitchcoc23 March 2006
Yes it is full of holes. The whole business of conservation of matter comes into play. Even if such a machine could be built, why did the exchange involve so much fly material and so little human. Remember, the parts were true to their original form. Forget that because that would ruin the movie. As it is, we have this poor man, Al Hedison (later David on Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea), who makes this wonderful machine for transporting matter (beam me up Scottie). He gets into it, not knowing there's a fly in there. What about the bacteria on the wall (this could have been called "The Stroptococcus." Oh, well, the thing happens and we have two beings created. A little fly with a a man's head and fly's body, and a gigantic fly head with a man's body. The brain thing is a little confusing, although it is addressed in the fact that the giant fly man is slowly losing his wits. Of course, what must be done is to catch the fly and put the two entities back together. With their luck, they might have created a little man and a gigantic housefly. So much of the movie is about the despair of trying to get this to happen. Eventually, the wife is seen as a murderer for killing her husband in a giant machine press. He story is a little hard to swallow. That's why the final scene with Vincent Price looking down at the spider web is so important. She needs to get off the hook.

Several viewers have pointed out that last scene. I, too, had nightmares when I first watched this at our little movie theater in 1958. That shrill whiny voice, the man with the little vocal chords who had aged as a fly would age, waiting for that enormous spider to suck out his bodily fluids--well, talk about your nightmares. It's sure a lot scarier than showing up at your graduation without any pants. I love these movies. If I sound disrespectful, I'm not. They were a part of my childhood. See this if you never have.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"It'd be funny if life wasn't so sacred."
bensonmum214 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
To begin with, I'm going to skip the normal plot summary. Most people probably know it anyway - a scientist has a horrific accident and turns himself into half man, half fly. And please don't misunderstand what I'm writing – I like and enjoy The Fly. My rating should be proof of that. But am I alone in thinking that The Fly may be a bit overrated? Actually, the term "overrated" is probably the wrong word as I'm not talking about the movie's rating per se. What I mean, is there anyone who cares that is not familiar with the movie or some of the more iconic images from The Fly whether they've seen the movie or not? Sure the movie is great once the creature makes an appearance, but for 2/3 of the film, it's pure melodrama of the worst kind.

Another question I have regarding The Fly, why is this seemingly one of Vincent Price's most beloved movies? He's neither villain nor hero – he's just there. So why all the acclaim for Vincent Price when it come to The Fly? I don't get it.

But what I do understand about The Fly is that regardless of my problems and questions, it's a fun movie that never fails to entertain. The acting is solid and the movie looks great. The Fly actually features some real atmosphere. And I find the unmasking scene second only to the one in The Phantom of the Opera (1925) as far as iconic scenes of this type go. Finally, I'm a huge fan of the special effects. Whether it's the fly's head on the human body or the human head on the fly's body, the special effects are a blast.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of My Favorite Classic Movies of the 50's
claudio_carvalho29 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In Montreal, the industrial François Delambre (Vincent Price) is called late night by his sister-in-law Helene Delambre (Patricia Owens). She tells him that she has just killed her beloved husband Andre Delambre (Al Hedison), using the press of their plant to press his head and left hand. François calls his acquaintance, Inspector Charas (Herbert Marshall), and later the reluctant Helene is convinced to tell them what happened. She explains that François had invented a matter transportation apparatus, and while experimenting with himself, a fly entered the chamber, exchanging one hand and the head with him after the transference.

"The Fly" is one of my favorite classic movies of the 50's. The story is great, blending romance, sci-fi and horror, and the narrative, through flashback, keeps the mystery alive until the last scene, when the fly with white head is finally found in a spider web screaming for help. I like very much the dialog when Inspector Charas smashes the spider and the fly with a stone, and François tells him that he is as killer as Helene is, since he killed a man-fly and Helene a fly-man. My vote is ten.

Title (Brazil): "A Mosca da Cabeça Branca" ("The Fly of the White Head")
25 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Caught In A Web Of Trouble
jcholguin6 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
David "Al" Hedison plays poor Andre Delambre, a scientist that loves his work and his family. Andre has created a "Matter Transfer" machine that has great possibilities in helping the world. Only his wife, Helene knows about his work and that knowledge will give her the scare of her life. As with most scientists in movies, Andre decides to experiment on himself which turns out to be the biggest and last mistake in his life. Unbeknown to Andre, a little housefly has flown into the same chamber when he transports himself. The atoms of his body mix with the fly and Andre no longer is the same man that Helene married. A fly-man has been developed. Andre ends up with a fly head and arm. Vincent Price is Andre's brother Francois that has no idea of what causes his sister-in-law to crush or apparently crush his brother's head and arm. Francois must find out the truth, the incredible truth. Can Francois change Andre back into a whole man again? Will Helene be executed for the murder of her husband? Just why does a little housefly with a white head play such a big role in the movie? The ending is one of the really classic scenes that leaves you wondering why spiders exist? Can a spider save the Delambre family? Watch and enjoy.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cool story, dull direction, great ending
Groverdox7 December 2017
"The Fly" is a really cool story which is sort of let down by fairly dull direction. It's never as horrifying as it should be, at least until the end.

The plot concerns a scientist who is found crushed by his own machine in a set-piece which is surprisingly bloody for a '50s picture. His wife admits to some involvement, but swears she didn't murder him. In flashbacks, we see the man invent teleportation devices which he uses on inanimate objects and then on animals. We learn that a mishap, perhaps due to this hubristic intrusion into God's realm, has led to the creation of a half-man, half-fly.

For much of "The Fly"'s run-time, I appreciated its story, but not the way it was told. Vincent Price, that actor of inimitable voice and bearing, does not, in fact, play the fly-man. His role in the movie is hard to account for. I understand that the audience might not have been expected to warm to the fly-man, but what about his wife? Could she not have been relied on to carry the movie, while at the same time providing a channel for pathos? I can't believe I'm having a hard time justifying Vincent Price's participation in a movie. It's not like his presence bothers you. It's just hard to explain.

Anyway, I was all set to give "The Fly" a seven out of ten. That is the rating I give to good movies which fail to hold my attention throughout due to pacing issues, or poor direction. Then I saw the ending, and what an ending. That will prove hard to forget, and was genuinely horrifying. Hence I would give "The Fly" seven-point-five out of ten, if IMDb would let me.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What cheesy Fun!
healingsmile3 February 2010
What cheesy Fun! This movie is not deep or profound, except for one message I will comment on later in my review. This is mostly pure, campy fun with a slight edge. The typical 1950's women who faints (eye roll.) Everyone stumbles and fumbles in every part of the movie in an attempt to put things right again. "Catch the fly, don't kill it!" and a second later the maid with that exact instruction has a fly swatter, and kills a kitchen fly. WTH?? There is one line I love when Vincent Price says "They couldn't hurt a fly." It isn't Shakespeare nor is it ever intended to be. I kind of enjoy movies from another generation. There is an innocence to these films that does not exist today. A movie without sex, nudity, excessive violence yet holds your attention. Under all the campy fun it does give us a message that is even more true today. Science can be a slippery slope and the "blessings" of modern medicine can turn into a curse. A fun, campy horror film with a interesting message for the genre. I would recommend!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It'd be funny if life wasn't so sacred.
hitchcockthelegend21 March 2020
The Fly is directed by Kurt Neumann and adapted to screenplay by James Clavell from the short story written by George Langelaan. It stars David Hedison, Patricia Owens, Vincent Price, Herbert Marshall, Kathleen Freeman and Betty Lou Gerson. Music is by Paul Sawtell and cinematography by Karl Struss.

When science goes berserk, The Fly finds Hedison as scientist Andre Delambre, who after successfully inventing the ability to transmit matter from one place to another - falls prey to a cruel slice of horrific fate...

Kurt Neumann would sadly pass away shortly after The Fly was released. Itself a terrible shame, it's doubly sad that he didn't get to see his film become a cult favourite with longevity assured. It's a film that smartly blends sci-fi with horror, and even managing to be fun into the bargain.

It's sometimes by modern observers accused of being too slow, but really it's a lesson in fine story telling. For at the heart of the tragic tale is a bountiful love story, the loyalty of a great wife in full effect. Throw in Andre's stoic pursuit of a science to benefit mankind, and this is a film that needs time to lay the story foundations.

Once we get to the horrors, and the surviving characters of the flashback structure play out this fateful tale, it simultaneously grips and fascinates. The effects work of course now looks a bit creaky, but those who first sampled them many decades ago have never ever forgotten the impact of the critical sequences.

Two pretty poor sequels would follow, which in turn would see a brilliant remake by David Cronenberg some 28 years later. Neumann's film is still a great piece of 1950s sci-fi, clinically adapted from a genius piece of short story writing. Loop holes exist, of course, but who cares, dive in and be haunted by what transpires on the screen. 8/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A 1950s Sci-Fi Classic
gavin69422 March 2015
A scientist (David Hedison) has a horrific accident when he tries to use his newly invented teleportation device.

The creators of this film made an interesting decision: casting Vincent Price in a supporting role rather than the lead. Of course, if he was the lead, he would have his face covered and relatively few lines to speak. So maybe that was the clincher.

This film really embraces the 1950s science fiction boom, with the giant computer and invention. Is this a "mad scientist"? Not in the least. Although he is not a particularly logical or well-reasoned scientist. Who tests something on the family cat before using something smaller, like a dead fish? And who tests things on themselves before others? Foolish.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
See The Re-Make Instead
ccthemovieman-118 March 2006
Here's one case where the re-make is far, far better than the original. This also is another case of a vastly overrated science-fiction film of the '50s. Most sci-fi films of that period, including this one, have such primitive special effects that they destroy any credibility of presenting a scary story.

In this particular film, the main drawback is not the dated effects but the sheer boredom of the story. It's too slow. A fly moves a lot faster than this flick.

One odd thing about the cast. The two stars of the film were "no-names" (Al Hedison and Patricia Owens) and the two supporting cast members were big names (Vincent Price and Herbert Marshall).

One plus for the film that you certainly didn't see in the re-make is they give God His due realizing that human beings are not supposed to "play God" and they state just that. Of course, that was edited out in the 1986 version. However, if you are looking for a straight horror/sci-fi thriller, watch that '86 re-make with Jeff Goldblum and Geena Davis. It is far better than this snoozer.
22 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed