Beast from Haunted Cave (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
84 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Beastly.
BA_Harrison11 March 2019
A web-covered creature is disturbed when a bunch of thieves set off an explosion in an old mine as a diversion while they steal some gold from a nearby town. The monster scuttles around the snow covered mountains of South Dakota, eventually focusing its attention on the criminals, who are hiding out in a cabin owned by unsuspecting mountain guide Gil Jackson (Michael Forest).

Barring the occasional brief glimpse of a hairy spider-like leg, the beast from Beast From Haunted Cave remains hidden until the end of the film, and it's easy to understand why: it looks so laughably bad that if viewers had seen it earlier, they'd probably have stopped watching and found something better to do with their time. Mind you, I can imagine many people not hanging in there for the final reel, such is the overall shoddy nature of this low-budget stinker, the film suffering from turgid direction, a weak script bogged down by too much talk, and a cheap aesthetic.

Forest makes for a bland hero, Sheila Noonan is forgettable as gangster's moll Gypsy, and most of the supporting cast do little to help matters. Only Frank Wolff as head criminal Alexander Ward impresses, the actor succeeding in making his character genuinely loathesome and fully deserving of a nasty fate.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Beast from the Haunted Cave
Scarecrow-882 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Alex, Marty, Byron, and Gypsy (Frank Wolff, Wally Campo, Richard Sinatra, and Sheila Noonan) move from place to place, successful bank robbers, now in South Dakota, preparing to blow a mine so that the local authorities will be distracted while they are heisting loot (gold bars)from another location. They hire a ski resort owner/instructor, Gil Jackson (Michael Forest) to train them on how to ski, wanting him to take them to a specific spot where the group plans to catch an airplane ride, gold bars in tow. What none of them expect is to be in the midst of a creature that has been following close behind, living in a reputed haunted cave. Early Hellman picture is nothing special, but will probably remain a watchable item due to the novelty of featuring an up and coming director learning under the tutelage of Corman, allowed a bit of freedom as long as he keeps the production cost under budget. The "beast" of the title is basically a giant spider with two extended appendages that grab victims (Hellman is wise enough to keep the camera close and covers the creature in cob webs, never showing its face or total body, because doing so would hinder the creep factor). I think the most effective scenes have victims cocooned in web, white, lifeless faces displaying the drained blood thanks to the creature's thirsty appetite. Most of the film is rather dialogue-heavy, featuring noirish hoods, with Hellman preparing us for the eventual showdown between Alex, the leader of the thieves with a nasty streak that shows when he loses his temper, and the dashing, pipe-smoking, nature-loving, mild-mannered ski instructor, Gil. I know Forest from shows like Star Trek and The Outer Limits, and his character here is likable enough, tolerant of the obnoxious behavior of Byron and Marty. The animosity that starts to brew between Alex and Gil stems from Gypsy's burgeoning disenchantment with her current "family". It is evident early that Gypsy is falling hard for the handsome Gil, someone who could possibly offer her a better, more fruitful life. Alex is a calculating career criminal who likes the thrill his "occupation" provides, but he cannot contain his anger when Gypsy is flirting with Gil; Alex's jealousy in his Achilles' Heel. The creature mainly shows up at the end, with a great portion of the film dedicated to Alex's set-in-motion plans for the heist and exit strategy, Gil just a means to an end, the guide who takes them where they need to go to get on a plane (that doesn't show up on schedule due to inclement weather), Canada their destination. Like in many other (much better) heist films, the robbery is successful, but the escape plans go awry, this time a creature disrupting the supposed fool-proof trip out of the country and on to greener pastures. Good South Dakota locations help. Leisurely paced (even barely over an hour it feels longer), with less emphasis (probably because Hellman was little interested in making the standard creature feature picture) on monster attacks (until the very end in the cave, that is) and more on the dynamic that exists between the principles (particularly the love triangle).
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too Slow but Has a Great Ending
Space_Mafune19 January 2003
This film details the plot of a group of gold-robbers who unwittingly run into trouble when they become stalked by a strange spider-like beast while hiding out from the police in the woods.

This film is Slow..very slow..too slow for most people to stick with till the end and that's a shame as the ending has a surprisingly effective climatic showdown with the monster which is certainly entertaining. There's some decent thoughtful dialogue in this movie as well.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Beast of Boredom!
Coventry2 June 2009
On paper, this simply couldn't go wrong! The long-feature debut of brilliant director/producer Monte Hellman ("Two-Lane Backtop", "Cockfighter"), owing its existence to legendary producer Roger Corman, and fully belonging in one of my favorite cinematic hypes of all time: cheap 50's monstrous B-movies! Evidently, a whole lot went wrong… From sheer boring dialogs over irrelevant sub plots and onwards to a largely absent and – above all – uninspired titular monster design. The "beast" looks like a vague shape covered in cobwebs and that's just plain lame; even according to zero-budget 50's horror standards. The basic plot definitely holds potential, and for the first 20 minutes or so, I felt convinced I was watching a undiscovered gem of the genre. But the, incomprehensibly, the plot somehow stopped evolving and became an unendurably boring ordeal to struggle through. A quartet of gangsters carefully planned a risky gold heist near a skiing resort. Whilst the drunken love interest already embarks on a skiing trip with the instructor, the other three break into a bank before joining the others. During their perfect alibi, however, the assembly encounters (eventually) a hairy and aggressive monster living in the mountain caves. "Beast from Haunted Cave" is a nearly insufferably dull film, and that's all the more painful to acknowledge due to the promising intro. The heist concept is ingenious, the characters are intriguing (the girl is a manic depressive drunk and one of the robbers is a womanizer) and the ski-resort setting is quite effective (cashing in on the contemporary Abominable Snowman paranoia). The rudimentary plot ingredients for a charming 50's monster-mayhem flick are well present, but I'm extremely reluctant to announce this movie is an utter failure. Disappointing to the nth degree
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A pleasant surprise
NxNWRocks7 May 2007
In the great scheme of all things cinematic this is certainly not a great movie, but it is in many ways an intriguing one. Made in 1959, it is billed as and pretends to be another example of the '50s creature-features, but it largely eschews the standard formatting of those films for a deeper, character-driven narrative, more in common with subsequent films of the sixties and beyond. In that sense, it is slightly ahead of its time.

In fact, the horror elements take a back seat for much of the film, which plays more as a drama of tensions between a band of criminals and the skiing guide they have hired as part of their cover story. From this point of view, the film's real strengths come to light. The characters are written as though they could be actual people and not just devices to move the plot along, as some earlier films of the genre tended to portray their casts. The photography is very good, and there is a superb performance by Sheila Noonan as a troubled moll, one that virtually carries the movie and makes it much more interesting whenever she is on screen.

While the characterization is good for a B-movie, the writing is somewhat uneven. There are some quite deep philosophical insights offered up by the characters, such as the benefits of city life versus country living. If the writer wanted to take these musings in a more serious direction, perhaps this could have been Beast From Plato's Cave. But we can't read too much into a film where the guide's sister - Kay Jennings in a neat little performance - tries to sweet-talk a handsome stranger with the line "Did I tell you I knitted this sweater?" to which he replies "Is knitting your scene?" Some find the ending quite disturbing and scary for a film of its time. Others may find it somewhat flimsy and rushed. Either way, this film still has enough going for it to rate as a must-see for the serious fans of the genre.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I don't mind a slow film but this is just plain dull
bensonmum212 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
  • After stealing a load of gold, three gangsters (and a girl) hire the local ski instructor to take them on a cross country ski trip. They plan to meet a plane that's to take them to Canada, but they don't plan on the blizzard that makes that impossible. Oh, and there's some sort of monster on the loose.


  • Beast from the Haunted Cave is as dull as dishwater. It's padded with some of the most mind-numbing conversations imaginable. These people will talk about anything and everything if it means extending the running time. Other than the 10 foot long arms, the monster reminded me of It from the Addams Family. Better than many of the 50s monsters, but not much better. The music is all over the place and often doesn't fit well with the action on screen. A pre-title sequence has a snappy jazz score that could be mistaken for something out of a Jess Franco film. That's immediately followed by a very serious pipe organ that could easily be mistaken for music from Carnival of Souls. Other than Sheila Carol, the acting is abysmal.


  • The silliest moment (and there are several) occurs after the cross country trip when the group arrives at the ski instructor's cabin. It takes at least two days to get there, so it's definitely isolated. What do the gangsters find when they arrive? A housekeeper! Hazel would have been proud of this woman's dedication.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"It might be nice to have a future, even a petty little one." Absolutely awful 50's monster film.
poolandrews24 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Beast from Haunted Cave is set in a ski resort & on the snowy slopes somewhere in South Dakota called 'Happiness Lodge' where a quartet of thieves, Alexander Ward (Frank Wolff), Gypsy Boulet (Sheila Noonan), Marty Jones (Richard Sinatra) & Byron Smith (Wally Campo), intend to rob the local bank & use an explosion in an old mine shaft as a diversion before making their getaway across country on ski's, sounds foolproof right? Well wrong because Gil Jackson (Michael Forset) their ski instructor becomes suspicious of the quartet & when Byron plants the explosives in the mine his date Natalie (Linne Ahlstrand) is taken by a hideous spider creature thing which, as an experience, leaves him a gibbering wreck. To add to their worries as they hide out in a remote cabin owned by Gil waiting for their getaway ride the monster reappears intent on making meals out of them all...

Apparently a remake of Naked Paradise (1957) & directed by Monte Hellman Beast from Haunted Cave is a low budget Corman quickie that really doesn't have much to recommend it by. The script by Charles B. Griffith is really slow, has lots of padding to fill the minutes out & doesn't offer any surprises. Beast from Haunted Cave can't quite decide what it wants to be & as such tries to mix a crime thriller with horror. A mix which, in this case, is far from successful. There are just so many instances of boring conversations, people walking around doing nothing ion particular & the monster itself barely makes an appearance until the final five or so minutes. The character's are unlikable & there's annoyingly named brother & sister Gil & Jill (how would they know who their parents were talking to?).

Director Hellman does nothing to add any sort of style or excitement to the dull proceedings. Only the monsters cocooned victims offer any sort of effective horror. He wisely hides the monster until the end where, when finally seen, looks like a guy with a blanket over his head & a few spider legs sticking out of him. It ain't going to impress anyone these days although if you have a thing for actors in dumb looking monster suits then you may find something here to enjoy.

Technically Beast from Haunted Cave isn't as bad as it could have been, silly monster apart. It's reasonably well made, the black and white cinematography is decent enough & the locations are nice enough. The acting is generally wooden although not as bad as in some of these types of films.

Beast from Haunted Cave is a real bore to sit through, the monster is barely seen or used & as a whole the film doesn't have any redeeming features. Only die hard 50's monster film fans need apply, everyone should try their best to avoid it.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Typical Trash Movie of the 50's
claudio_carvalho1 August 2006
In a skiing station in Dakota, a gang of criminals leaded by Alexander "Alex" Ward (Frank Wolff) plans the heist of golden bars from a small bank. While the lover of Alex, Gypsy Boulet (Sheila Carol), goes to an isolated cabin with the ski instructor Gil Jackson (Michael Forest), a time bomb explodes a cave to divert the attention of the locals and the gangsters steal the gold. But the explosion releases a spider-like monster and due to a storm, the group becomes trapped in Gil's cabin and threatened by the creepy beast.

The debut of Monte Hellman as director is a typical trash movie of the 50's. The story is not bad; the low budget effects are very poor and laughable; the heroine is gorgeous; the sudden conclusion gives the sensation that the shooting was interrupted; and the cover of the Brazilian DVD is extremely funny with the following text: "Young girls scared and sucked by a maze of horror and blood of a hunger beast from hell", which is delightfully funny and ridiculous, since the story has nothing to do with it. In spite of these remarks, I like this type of film, which are part of mine childhood, therefore "Beast From Haunted Cave" is a good entertainment at least for me. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "A Besta da Caverna Assombrada" ("The Beast From the Haunted Cave")
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great example of low-budget horror
henri sauvage2 November 2001
One of the rarest experiences for a B-movie fanatic is to find a film you haven't seen in 30-plus years is much better than your childhood memory of it. While "Beast From Haunted Cave" was obviously made on a shoestring -- it's a Gene "Brother Of Roger" Corman production, so what do you expect? -- first-time director Monte Hellman (The Shooting, Two Lane Blacktop) had a better-than-average script and capable actors, not to mention a director of photography who made effective use of the stark winter landscape near Deadwood, South Dakota.

The film starts out slow as a gang plans and executes a robbery, but then it veers off into darker territory as they and their guide are trailed to the hideout by a surprisingly well-realized and startlingly nasty monster.

This is by no means a perfect film: There are occasional stumbles in motivation, dialogue and the timing of events, yet for me these inconsistencies actually contributed to an atmosphere of dreamlike disorientation as the story plays out against the bleached-bone white of the snow and the soot-black shadows of winter pines. The plight of the Beast's victims -- cocooned alive, and fully aware as it feeds on them -- yields a heaping helping of shudders.

The DVD transfer (I'm talking about the most recent release, not the one paired with "The Brain That Wouldn't Die") was made from an excellent print; the soundtrack is quite clear. You may recognize the score as the same used for "Attack Of The Giant Leeches" and -- I think -- "Night Of The Blood Beast": These guys knew how to recycle!

Even with its defects, this is a distinctly weird and surprisingly gruesome chiller, a fine example of how much can be accomplished even with limited resources.
33 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Low-Budget Talk Fest
Michael_Elliott2 October 2017
Beast from Haunted Cave (1959)

** (out of 4)

Slow-moving but mildly entertaining horror film from director Monte Hellman has a group of thieves stealing some gold and deciding to hide out in the snowy mountains. Their plan seems to be working at first but soon they come across a giant spider deep within the cave.

This here was an early Roger Corman production and like a lot of the films from this era you soon realize that they were working with very little money, which means that there's going to be a lot of talking and very little action. One of the Corman's most known sayings was how when you're monster looks bad it's best to keep it hidden. That pretty much happens in BEAST FROM HAUNTED CAVE as the spider is rarely seen outside of a part here or a part there. The bad costume finally shows up at the very end but at that point it's too late to turn the film off.

I thought the cast were decent for what they were asked to do, which was basically hit their marks and say their lines. The cast were at least interesting enough to keep you glued to the movie and to stick with it longer than you probably would have otherwise. The spider creature design is obviously very cheap but there's some mild charm that you can take from it.

Hellman would go onto make much better cult movies but this one here was mildly entertaining as long as you don't take it too serious.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
with money, this could have been good
grnhair200115 May 2012
The film clearly was done on little money, but there are a number of matters that elevate it above other cheap monster films of the era.

Charles Griffith does a much better job with dialog than he did in It Conquered the World or Little Shop of Horrors. There's some actual meaning in the banter. Furthermore, it is delivered in an interesting style that also might derive from the low budget, so that chunks of the dialog are oddly timed, and naturalistic for that. I was only half-watching early on, and suddenly the delivery of the lines made me really attend to the thing.

I liked Sinatra in this--never heard of him before watching this movie.

As others have said, it's slow in the middle, fairly exciting at the end.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Chilling Gangster/Horror Hybrid
twanurit24 February 2003
This is chilling in more ways than one: actually filmed in the cold, snowy Dakotas, it's the story of crooks who create a diversion by blowing up a cave, so they can rob a nearby town. Trouble is they've disrupted the lair of a vampiric spidery beast which follows them as they head toward a hide-out in the forest. This is a truly eerie effort, enhanced by ripe dialogue, excellent direction (Monte Hellman), co-produced by the Corman brothers, to maximum effect. The music is especially shuddery, also used in at least "Attack of the Giant Leeches" (1958), "Night of the Blood Beast" (1958) and "The Wasp Woman" (1959). Three performers never reached their potential: Richard Sinatra as a crook (and relative of Frank's) only made a few pictures, Frank Wolff, the head honcho, committed suicide 12 years later at age 40, and lastly Sheila Carol, who did only 3 films, and is memorable as the Lauren Bacall-ish, unhappy moll who longs for the kidnapped guide (Michael Forest), but is stuck with the abusive Wolff. The final sequence in the atmospheric cave, (pre-dates "Alien" - 1979), will give you nightmares for years.
31 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gangsters and Monsters collide in a drive-in classic
dbborroughs29 October 2006
Drive-in classic is the first time cult director Monte Hellman made a feature. Here its the story of a bunch of gangsters on the run after a robbery who hide out in a cabin in the mountains. Adding to the complications is a monster lurking in a near by cave. As the gangsters try to figure out how to get away from the law they also have to deal with the monster who is whittling away at their number.

Its a creepy little movie thats perfect for late night movie viewing on a cold winters night. Far from the greatest film ever made its just an enjoyable little horror film that manages to balance both the crime and monster (although I'm the first to admit that the monster at times seems to have been a secondary thought.) Worth a look and a bag of popcorn, especially on Halloween.

(The running time of this movie was originally 65 minutes. Additional scenes were added for TV broadcasts)
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Typical Roger Corman Fodder
JoeB13111 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This is more Roger Corman chewy goodness, and I wasn't sure if I had seen this film before or if I've just seen so much of Roger's output I don't know the difference anymore.

The plot is that after a heist involving blowing up a mine and robbing a gold depository in Deadwood, North Dakota, a group of robbers high-tails it into the remote mountains awaiting escape into Canada. Too bad they awoke a monster in the process.

What we get are a lot of the awful character actors who seem to populate Corman's films being attacked by a cheap monster that often also populated the same genre. I'm guessing this monster is supposed to be some kind of giant spider, but who knows, really. When it finally appears on screen, it looks silly.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slow 5O's Corman builds to terrific climax
jradice18 February 2003
Warning: Spoilers
This was another childhood late late show haunting memory I saw some time back. Still excruciatingly SLOOOOOOW til the final exciting fifteen minutes of fame. HOWEVER, the characters are a bit better developed than usual, AND director Hellman (who went on to direct Jack Nicholson in some interesting 7O's cult films) cut his teeth fairly well on this early low budget effort by creating a dark and eerie haunting mood and morbidly chilling atmosphere.

We know the basic plot, but the genre reversal has its offbeat merits: the gangsters-on-the-lame crime noir tale that gradually slides into a scary supernatural story. 'Twilight Zone' and 'Thriller' used those narrative techniques effectively in building mystery and high-edged suspense. There are those few moments throughout when the Lovecraftian creature appears like a phantom from out of the cold darkness and attacks various charactors - and they still shook me.

'Blair Witch' took some subtle clues here of the fear of the unseen lurking menace that can see you, but you can't see it.

WARNING: POSSIBLE SPOILERS

However, it's the last part where they finally encounter the beast in the cave that makes up for lost time. The monster is original and quite freakishly scary - and, to top the monster-menu, it's also inhabited by the evil revengeful Indian Warrior. Not a tame mix. This beast can suddenly move fast-as-hell and be upon you just like that -once its got you, that's all folks. And that blood-sucking scene was quite morbid for the time - even now. No gore, just a scary mood topped with final frightening action - GRIM GUSTO.

The actors do well enough that I came to know them a bit and even cared somewhat as to their dire fate in haunted cave. The ending stayed with me for a long time after my first 12 year old viewing. Yes, you can see an early 'Alien' precursor here.

The interestingly weird spider-like monster outfit was personally designed and operated from within by actor Chris Robinson, who appeared in supporting roles on "Outer Limits", "Fugitive" and "Invaders" as well as other mostly low budget, but notable films, later in the sixties. I wholeheartingly applaud his creative ingenuity and esoteric determination - who else would wear that bloody thing?

Like most B&W 5O's B's, it looks best at 2:OO AM. Corman was a sufficient wiz at these endeavors and always lent a strange absorbing charm and appealing offbeat character to these minor atmospheric gems; that often surprised me by being just a little bit better than I had anticipated.

Be ready to fast-forward during the drawn-out middle section. Climax is grisly, but it's the wicked stuff of good B horror. GIVE BEAST A CHANCE.

P.S. Did a younger Kubrick ever see this? The weird idea of the haunting, accursed Indian Spirit is a little similar to "The Shining's" supernatural Indian folklore theme. BRRRRRR! ,
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring and confusing.
13Funbags30 May 2017
While this movie doesn't have all the typical low budget horror clichés, it's still manages to move slowly and confuse you at the same time. The acting isn't too bad, it's not a constant tight shot and they are smart enough to never let you get a good look at the low quality monster, yet somehow it's still not good. The premise is bad enough. Some guys steal six bars of gold and are prepared to kill multiple people to get away and they have the longest and slowest possible get away planned. The beast is first seen in a gold mine and then later it lives in a haunted cave so I'm not sure what's up with that but that's the least confusing thing about the movie. The best thing I can say about this is that most 70 minute movies are much worse. Two stars.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not really a horror film
preppy-312 December 2003
A bunch of gangsters holed up in a remote ski cabin face off against a giant monster...or something. But that doesn't really happen until the last 10 minutes or so! The rest is just a so-so gangster drama dealing with the members and their interactions. The monster is just incidental to the plot.

The movie isn't terrible. The script is OK (if predictable) and there's a very good performance by Sheila Carol. Also they manage to actually work up a few scary moments. But the rest of the acting is lousy, there's endless padding (even at 65 minutes) and it's never explained what the monster is or how it came into being (it's suggested once...then dropped).

I've seen worse but I've seen better too. An OK time waster--nothing more.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Beast of Boredom
wes-connors1 May 2012
In snowy South Dakota, handsome ski instructor Michael Forest (as Gil Jackson) gets involved with sensuous Sheila Carol (as Gypsy Boulet) and a gang of thieves led by her jealous lover Frank Wolff (as Alexander "Alex" Ward). The other crooks are wily Wally Campo (as Byron Smith) and Frank's cousin Richard Sinatra (as Marty Jones). The latter has the convincing line, "Nobody takes my watch!" The former takes cocktail waitress Linné Ahlstrand (as Natalie) out for a quickie, but she gets spun by the "Beat from Haunted Cave" instead. The monster is played by future soap opera star Chris Robinson, who also appears in the bar. The location and a couple of set-ups are okay, but that's about it for this dull, unwarranted horror.

*** Beast from Haunted Cave (10/30/59) Monte Hellman ~ Michael Forest, Sheila Noonan, Frank Wolff, Wally Campo
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The plot holes are larger than the deepest cavern in this cave of fools.
mark.waltz28 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In 1954's "Track of the Cat", color photography was pretty much invisible because most of the action took place on the snowy terrain of the far north of the Americas. Here, it is black and white photography which makes the plot almost seem invisible because of the boring way in which this science fiction thriller is told. Yes, there is a horrific looking monster, but you have to wait until the film is almost over before you get a glimpse of it. For the most part, the film deals with the arguments which occur between ski instructor Michael Forest and Frank Wolff, the head of a gold robbery, trapped in the wilderness while they wait for a plane that never comes. In the meantime, you see glimpses of various body parts of the creature which at times appears to be transparent. Sheila Carol plays Wolff's secretary (and possibly something more) named Gypsy (!) who falls for the handsome Forest, a noble young man who has given up the excitement of the city for the wind and air of South Dakota. Little does he realize that the explosion caused by the thieves to distract the law so they could rob the gold unleashes this horror, over in just 75 very boring minutes. The only real shock comes from the sight of the monster's victims, all caught literally in a giant web and basically being turned into giant juice boxes for the creature's bloody thirst. Performances are not bad considering the extremely low budget, wretched script, poor photography and amateurish manner in which it was filmed.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pitiful attempt at a monster flick
Leofwine_draca17 July 2016
BEAST FROM HAUNTED CAVE is a truly pathetic horror/thriller produced by Gene Corman, Roger's brother. It's clear that Roger had plenty of input in this film because it's stylistically similar to the likes of ATTACK OF THE GIANT LEECHES and just as inept. The storyline, which isn't too bad, is about a group of robbers who use a skiing trip as cover for their criminal activities, and the giant, cave-dwelling beast that scuppers their plans.

The problem with this film is all in the execution, because it's rubbish. At a running time of just an hour and fifteen minutes, it feels slow, slow, slow, and really tests the patience. The production values are low but the real problem is the script, which is full of time-wasting inanity. We never learn anything interesting about the stock characters and there's not a single witty line either.

The monster of the piece isn't seen too frequently, which is no bad thing seeing as it looks rubbish. At least the last twenty minutes has a little action to recommend it, but otherwise this film is a real chore to watch: bad acting, bad scripting, a lack of action and incident, and zero suspense. Of the cast, only future spaghetti western actor Frank Wolff and Shirley Eaton lookalike Sheila Noonan are worth mentioning. Incidentally, BEAST FROM HAUNTED CAVE was the first feature for cult director Monte Hellman; thankfully he went on to better things.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Monte Hellman's Crawling Circus
Bezenby15 August 2016
Two hired goons, a crime boss and his half-drunken, fed up 'secretary' plan a gold heist up in some ski/mining resort. This involves creating a diversion by blowing up a nearby mine, then raiding gold reserves, then tricking a guide into taking them cross country by ski to his cabin to await uplift by plane. The heist goes to plan, with a couple of minor setbacks: they manage to kill someone in the mine explosion and also unleash some sort of monster who then follows them across the land to finish the job.

First time I tried to watch this I started immediately falling asleep due to the constant banal dialogue and dark print. Second time round I was a bit sharper and enjoyed it a lot more. Although there is a lot of needless dialogue (including a pointless scene with one of the goons chatting up a character with no bearing on the plot) things do pick up a bit when the monster makes an appearance, as it is pretty freaky. Director Monte Hellman keeps glimpses of the creature to a minimum at first, but it does become clear that it likes to wrap up its victims in webs to feed on. It also has really long legs and a creepy call and really needs a haircut.

Our folks are all bickering, the bad chick wants to turn good and run off with the guide, and one of the goons is quite taken by the Indian housekeeper. It was refreshing to see these folks for the most part weren't exactly scared of the monster, instead always running out to try and kill the thing before it killed them. For a fifties horror film (a roger corman affiliated one at that) this carried a bit more atmosphere and had a scarier monster than, say, the creeping terror.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Location, location, location!
PCC092116 September 2020
Roger Corman and brother Gene spent about $72.50 on this one. I'm kidding of course. It was probably in the thousands, but still cheap. Roger got composer Alexander Laszlo to do the soundtrack, had a cast that included Playmate Linné Ahlstrand in a small part and was able to piggyback this shoot with another one of his films, Ski Troop Attack (1960). After coming up with a plot that mimics that of Key Largo (1948), he added a monster then landed the biggest star of the film, Deadwood, South Dakota.

That's right, the best thing about this film is its shooting location. Beautiful, majestic, snow-covered, Black Hills mountains that made the film interesting enough to say, "check it out". The shooting of the film was treacherous, cold and scary. If you are going to go get Playmates, Composers and picturesque locations, write a better script, bring a better camera along, check your audio equipment and don't shoot it in thirteen days. If you have no money for special effects, drop the monster. The effects in this film are atrocious and you could easily have made it a much better film, by taking one of the characters and making them a crazy killer or something.

In closing, the acting wasn't too bad, but the creative technique just isn't there. The directing and editing is freshman at best. If it wasn't for the skiing scenes, the snow-covered landscapes and the cool, creepy cave locations, this film wouldn't be worth watching at all. In my opinion an IMDB rating of 3 or less is unwatchable, but I gave this a 4, because you need to see it as a chapter in the legendary Corman film-history.

4.0 (F MyGrade) = 4 IMDB
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This one really frightened me
rpurdy5 March 2005
when I saw it on TV, back in the mid-sixties, when I was about 14 years old. I was then, and continue to be, a lover of horror films. For some reason, this one really got to me, more than just about any other in this genre, except maybe "The Pit and the Pendulum". I don't recall now just what the beast looked like but I recall that it was suitably realistic for its time. It took a while for the story to get moving but was well worth the wait. I recall that I was truly horrified as the beast fed on its living victims. I had some nasty dreams for several weeks after seeing it. I haven't viewed this movie since then but would definitely jump at the chance. I recommend it.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
BEAST FROM HAUNTED CAVE {Extended Version} (Monte Hellman, 1959) **1/2
Bunuel197618 July 2011
I hereby inaugurate a 10-movie tribute to the director of this film on the occasion of his birthday; I had always been interested in catching up with the horror/thriller hybrid under review, as much due to my fondness for the former genre as Hellman's own well-deserved reputation (here making his debut). I had even intended purchasing the Synapse DVD but balked at the hefty price-tag of their bare-bones edition (especially when considering that this is a 'Public Domain' title); as often happens, after going the extra mile to acquire the film, it turned up virtually unheralded on Italian TV (albeit in the original language)!

Anyway, the version I watched was the slightly extended one – running 72 minutes against the official 64, though I have no idea what constitutes the additional footage. By the way, the film is reportedly a semi-remake of a very minor Roger Corman outing called NAKED PARADISE (1957); incidentally, this one was produced by his brother Gene! It is obviously a low-budgeted effort whose lack of proper funds is mainly evident in the muffled soundtrack and the sparse, indistinct appearance of the tentacled, wraith-like titular monster itself (which is seen stalking the gang throughout and eerily keeps its victims, still alive, in a cocoon – the latter scenes are said to have inspired the ALIEN films to some degree)!

The main plot deals with a skiing trip (complete with instructor/guide) and an explosion in a cave (the ongoing excavation works had unearthed the prehistoric{?} beast to begin with!) being used as cover for a heist of gold ingots from the neighboring small town. The gang is the usual assortment of tensed-up types: a quarrelsome couple (he being played by future "Euro-Cult" regular Frank Wolff and she a hard-drinking nymphomaniac); a slightly beefy and nervous young man which, however, does not preclude him from eyeing a couple of ladies along the way (played by Frank Sinatra's cousin Richard{!}, he is the first to come into contact with the monster and also the one to ultimately dispatch it); and the obligatory comic relief character who is easily the least interesting and most annoying (especially when turned on by the hero's Hispanic maid!); the male lead, too, is the customary handsome fellow to whom the movie's female counterpart becomes attracted, in spite of her husband's repeated warnings to steer clear (a situation which eventually erupts into a violent row that involves practically all the protagonists), and whose own sister flirts with Sinatra but exits the picture soon after very early on into the movie!

The thieves-hiding-out-in-a-snowy-locale element of the plot (for the record, the film was made concurrently with Roger Corman's negligible war adventure SKI TROOP ATTACK {1960}) recalls Jacques Tourneur's fine, recently-viewed noir NIGHTFALL (1957) – having mentioned Corman, he would himself repay the tribute done him by Hellman here by remaking it yet again (monster included this time around, and with a similar title to boot) as CREATURE FROM THE HAUNTED SEA (1961)!; since I also own the latter, I will be watching it as a companion piece to this one…and, reportedly, Hellman was actually engaged to shoot new scenes in order to expand its length for the TV version! On the other hand, the effective (if somewhat rushed) climax of BEAST seems to have influenced the finale to John Carpenter's THE THING (1982; itself a remake of the 1951 Howard Hawks sci-fi classic)! In the end, Hellman only returned to the horror genre when he needed the money to get his inherently personal projects off the ground – resulting in the straight-to-video sequel SILENT NIGHT, DEADLY NIGHT III: BETTER WATCH OUT! (1989)...
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It's really just a bad movie.
dfranzen7011 June 2019
It's not a beast from *a* haunted cave, it's from a cave called Haunted. Or not. I think they need an indefinite article in there. Either way, this is a low-budget, low-effects, low-costume thriller about a gang robbing a lodge and then escaping via cross-country skiing. There's a menacing leader, the sensitive guy, the dopey guy, and the 'secretary.' And the guide who's smarter than any of them know! Plus a formidable Native American housekeeper. But the real star of the show is the monster, which looks quite tame (and humorous) by modern standards. Roger Corman was the producer, and Monte Hellman made his directing debut, so you know expense was spared all over the place. I did like some of the dialog, particularly from Sheila Noonan as the moll. This is probably best viewed as an unserious example of wacky monster movies of the 1950s.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed